Cases from cite.case.law:

SADLAK, v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC,, 252 So. 3d 302 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . statute - in this case, section 48.031 - and the "Return of execution of process" statute (section 48.21 . . . the return to see if it contained all of the information required by the applicable statute: Section 48.21 . . . Id. § 48.21(1). The return of service, here, meets these requirements. . . . While sections 48.031(1)(a) and 48.21(1) do not require that the return of service list the title of . . . Finally, even though sections 48.031(1)(a) and 48.21(1) do not require that the return list the exact . . .

MURPHY, v. CACH, LLC,, 230 So. 3d 599 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . jurisdiction over her because the amended affidavit of substitute service did not strictly comply with section 48.21 . . . Section 48.21 governs the return of execution of process. . . . effective as if the return had originally stated the omitted facts or included the signature.... § 48.21 . . . Here, the amended affidavit of service of process is facially deficient under section 48.21 because it . . . ) (holding that return of service indicating that a Jane Doe was served was defective under section 48.21 . . .

FLAAEN, v. PRINCIPAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, INC., 226 F. Supp. 3d 1162 (W.D. Wash. 2016)

. . . basic benefits to be provided by disability insurance contracts which are subject to chapters 48.20 and 48.21 . . .

M. COUTTS, v. SABADELL UNITED BANK, N. A., 199 So. 3d 1099 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . The court noted that “the language of section 48.21 does not expressly incorporate section 48.031, nor . . . The court refused to en-graft the provisions of section 48.031 onto section 48.21, acknowledging it “ . . . Applying Roster, we conclude that the return of service complied with section 48.21 and contained the . . . The burden requires the party to demonstrate that the return of service is, under section 48.21, facially . . . Section 48.21(1) provides: Each person who effects service of process shall note on a return-of-service . . .

MATTHEWS v. U. S. BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, N. A. LXS, 197 So. 3d 1140 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . Section 48.21, Florida Statutes (2014), identifies “four facts that a return of process shall note:” . . . the returns of service are regular on their face as they contain the four facts required by section 48.21 . . .

MAURO v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N. A., 180 So. 3d 1083 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . relied on the returns in this case, which were sworn and contained all the information which section 48.21 . . . process may sign the return-of-service form using an electronic signature certified by the sheriff. § 48.21 . . .

DAVIDIAN v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, FDIC FA,, 178 So. 3d 45 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . is that no evidence was presented to demonstrate that the returns .of service complied with section 48.21 . . . They were shown to comply with section 48.031 and 48.21, Florida Statutes (2015). . . .

KOSTER, v. SULLIVAN,, 160 So. 3d 385 (Fla. 2015)

. . . section 48.031(l)(a), Florida Statutes (2009), which are not included in the requirements of section 48.21 . . . Section 48.21 governs the return of execution of process, and section 48.031(l)(a) governs service of . . . Relevant Statutes and Standard of Review When process was served in this case, section 48.21 provided . . . See § 48.21, Fla. Stat. . . . Section 48.21 clearly states the information that shall be included in a return of service. . . .

SDS- IC, v. FLORIDA CONCENTRATES INTERNATIONAL, LLC DS, LLC LLC, 157 So. 3d 389 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . Section 48.21(1) provides that the required return-of-service form must include “the date and time when . . . Section 48.21(2) adds that although the return-of-service is amendable, the failure to state the required . . .

ROMEO s h a v. U. S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, As BNC, 144 So. 3d 585 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . Section 48.21, Florida Statutes (2013), governs returns of executions of process. . . . Section 48.21(2) states that “[a] failure to state the facts ... required by subsection (1) invalidates . . . Florida courts have relied upon both the return of execution of process statute— section 48.21 — and . . . is regular on its face, no matter what type of service, is governed only by the language of section 48.21 . . . Thus, the affidavits are defective on their face under section 48.21 because they actually state that . . .

KARPENSKI, v. AMERICAN GENERAL LIFE COMPANIES, LLC, d b a d b a AG d b a U. S. d b a U. S. d b a, 999 F. Supp. 2d 1218 (W.D. Wash. 2014)

. . . RCW 48.18 deals with insurance contracts generally while RCW 48.21 governs aspects of group and blanket . . . As the more specific statute, RCW 48.21 is not displaced by the later amended, more general RCW 48.18 . . .

KOSTER, v. SULLIVAN,, 103 So. 3d 882 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . Because a strict reading of section 48.21, Florida Statutes (2010), supports the trial court’s finding . . . Koster argued below that for the return of service to be sufficient under section 48.21, the term “manner . . . that it is clear that the return of service at issue here meets the textual requirements of section 48.21 . . . See § 48.21; see also Carone v. . . . [the] statutory requirements [outlined in section 48.21] of a proper return of execution of process.” . . .

VIVES, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N. A., 128 So. 3d 9 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . Section 48.21, Florida Statutes (2009), which is titled “Return of execution of process,” provides, in . . . regular on its face because it fails to satisfy the requirements set forth in sections 48.031(l)(a) and 48.21 . . .

ROBLES- MARTINEZ, v. DIAZ, REUS TARG, LLP,, 88 So. 3d 177 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . the return to see if it contained all of the information required by the applicable statute: Section 48.21 . . . manner in which service was made and the name of person served, both of which are required under section 48.21 . . .

E. VIDAL, v. SUNTRUST BANK,, 41 So. 3d 401 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . The return of service fully complied with the statutory provisions contained in section 48.21, Florida . . .

K. SEYMOUR a v. PANCHITA INVESTMENT, INC., 28 So. 3d 194 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . Seymour moved to amend the return of service pursuant to section 48.21, Florida Statutes (2004). • August . . . P. 1.070 and 1.080, and §§ 48.081, 48.21, 607.0504 and 607.0505, Fla. Stat. (2009). . . . .

H F TIRES, L. P. a v. D. GLADIS COMPANY, INC. a a CW a a, 981 So. 2d 647 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . limited partnership as provided for in s. 48.181, or process may be served as provided in ss. 48.071 and 48.21 . . .

RE- EMPLOYMENT SERVICES, LTD. GSK v. NATIONAL LOAN ACQUISITIONS COMPANY,, 969 So. 2d 467 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . and time the process server received the summons and complaint for service, as required by section 48.21 . . . accurately record the date and time the summonses and complaint came to hand as required by section 48.21 . . . The statutory provisions that govern return of service are found in section 48.21, which specifically . . . to hand, but also it actually stated that it came to hand before the summonses were even issued. § 48.21 . . . NLAC essentially argues that despite the clear requirements of section 48.21, it is not necessary to . . .

TAVARES, v. UNITED STATES, 230 F. Supp. 2d 126 (D. Mass. 2001)

. . . In contrast, the K-Chem report shows a gross weight of 48.21 grams for the large bag and 19.27 grams . . .

KHAMBATY, v. E. LEPINE,, 734 So. 2d 1183 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . See § 48.21, Fla. Stat. (1995). . . .

WASHINGTON PHYSICIANS SERVICE ASSOCIATION Of A a a a a a a a a a a v. O. GREGOIRE,, 967 F. Supp. 424 (W.D. Wash. 1997)

. . . Carriers,” which are defined in RCW 48.43.005(8) as “a disability insurer regulated under Chapter 48.20 or 48.21 . . .

SUTOR, v. COCHRAN,, 687 So. 2d 897 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . Section 48.21 sets forth the requirements for return of service. . . .

JORDAN, JORDAN, v. D. JACKSON, L., 15 F.3d 333 (4th Cir. 1994)

. . . . # 8E8E #48.205, 48.21 (1987 & Supp.1993) (decision by intake worker; hearing within 24 hours, excluding . . .

R. KAHN A. Jr. v. VIRGINIA RETIREMENT SYSTEM CSX, 13 F.3d 110 (4th Cir. 1993)

. . . The net effect of this transaction was that the Commonwealth received $48.21 per share. . . . Commonwealth purchasing the shares from VRS for $28 per share and reselling the shares to VRS for $48.21 . . .

KAHN, v. VIRGINIA RETIREMENT SYSTEM,, 783 F. Supp. 266 (E.D. Va. 1992)

. . . two stockholders more than $39.00 per share for their RF & P stock: (1) the Commonwealth received $48.21 . . .

RUSSELL, v. ZULLA,, 556 So. 2d 1241 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . where the complaint was not served upon him and where the process server failed to comply with section 48.21 . . . individual or substituted and the name of the person upon whom service was attempted, as required by section 48.21 . . . or substituted, or the name of the person upon whom service was attempted, in violation of section 48.21 . . . Even though section 48.21, Florida Statutes, permits amendment of the return of service for failure to . . . Section 48.21 states: Return of execution of process. . . .

NAVIS, v. FOND DU LAC COUNTY Du, 721 F. Supp. 182 (E.D. Wis. 1989)

. . . legal custodian shall also be notified of the time and place of the detention hearing required under s. 48.21 . . .

SCHNEIDERMAN, v. CANTOR, s a, 546 So. 2d 51 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . . § 48.21, Fla. Stat. (1987). . . .

BAY CITY MANAGEMENT, INC. v. HENDERSON, Jr., 531 So. 2d 1013 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . If no general partner is found in Florida, process may be served as provided in ss. 48.071 and 48.21. . . .

W. DONALD, v. POLK COUNTY,, 836 F.2d 376 (7th Cir. 1988)

. . . . § 48.21(1) (hearing must be held within twenty-four hours, excluding Saturdays and Sundays, of the . . .

DeSHANEY, a FIRST, v. WINNEBAGO COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES,, 812 F.2d 298 (7th Cir. 1987)

. . . . § 48.205(l)(a); see also §§ 48.19, 48.21). So Joshua was returned to Randy DeShaney’s custody. . . .

W. DONALD, A. D. v. POLK COUNTY, L. L. G. L. s, 649 F. Supp. 1408 (W.D. Wis. 1986)

. . . Under § 48.21, Wis.Stat. a child who is taken into custody and not released must be the subject of a . . .

GONZALEZ, v. TOTALBANK,, 472 So. 2d 861 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . . § 48.21, Fla.Stat. (1979); see also Herskowitz v. . . . Consequently, under section 48.21 and the cases which strictly construe substituted service provisions . . .

TETLEY, v. A. LETT,, 462 So. 2d 1126 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . Section 48.21, Florida Statutes (1981), provides: 48.21 Return of execution of process. . . .

C. LOSSMAN, v. H. PEKARSKE,, 707 F.2d 288 (7th Cir. 1983)

. . . . § 48.21(l)(b), which requires that such a petition be filed within 48 hours of the child’s being taken . . .

CALIFORNIA v. ARIZONA, 452 U.S. 431 (U.S. 1981)

. . . S 48“31/24" E 48.21 feet; 783. S 07°36'37" W 19.48 feet; 784. S 33°21/25" E 208.40 feet; 785. . . .

In N. BARNES,, 5 B.R. 376 (Bankr. D.D.C. 1980)

. . . Debtor’s original statement estimated $48.21 in miscellaneous expenses, bringing her total estimated . . .

NATIONAL INDUSTRIAL SAND ASSOCIATION, a v. F. MARSHALL, B. COUNCIL OF SOUTHERN MOUNTAINS, INC. v. F. MARSHALL,, 601 F.2d 689 (3d Cir. 1979)

. . . . §§ 48.1-48.12, 48.21-48.32 [hereinafter cited as 30 C.F.R. §-]. . . . published following analysis of these comments. . 30 C.F.R. §§ 48.1-48.12 (underground miners); id. §§ 48.21 . . . Id. at § 48.21. . 30 U.S.C. § 802(h)(1). . Id. § 811(d). . . . .

COUNTRY CLUBS OF SARASOTA, LTD. v. ZAUN EQUIPMENT, INC., 350 So. 2d 539 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

. . . Service of process may be made under §§ 48.071 and 48.21 on limited partnerships.” . . .

COOPER PLAZA LTD. a v. NIDETCH, 342 So. 2d 1072 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

. . . Service of process may be made under §§ 48.071 and 48.21 on limited partnerships.” . . .

RAYMOND W. WESOLOWSKI v. THE UNITED STATES, 174 Ct. Cl. 682 (Ct. Cl. 1966)

. . . Thereafter, commencing September 1957, he received temporary disability retirement pay in the amount of $48.21 . . .

UNITED STATES v. CERTAIN LANDS IN TOWN OF HIGHLANDS, N. Y., 49 F. Supp. 962 (S.D.N.Y. 1943)

. . . Land and Cottage 3,320.00 XXXIV (48.21) Cragston Associates, Inc. 560.00 XXXV (48.22) Cragston Associates . . . XXXIV (48.21) 560. $9,300. . . .