Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 48.20 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 48.20 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 48.20

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
Chapter 48
PROCESS AND SERVICE OF PROCESS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 48.20
48.20 Service of process on Sunday.Service or execution on Sunday of any writ, process, warrant, order, or judgment is void and the person serving or executing, or causing it to be served or executed, is liable to the party aggrieved for damages for so doing as if he or she had done it without any process, writ, warrant, order, or judgment. If affidavit is made by the person requesting service or execution that he or she has good reason to believe that any person liable to have any such writ, process, warrant, order, or judgment served on him or her intends to escape from this state under protection of Sunday, any officer furnished with an order authorizing service or execution by the trial court judge may serve or execute such writ, process, warrant, order, or judgment on Sunday, and it is as valid as if it had been done on any other day.
History.s. 44, Nov. 23, 1828; RS 1025; GS 1413; RGS 2611; CGL 4275; s. 4, ch. 67-254; s. 12, ch. 73-334; s. 283, ch. 95-147; s. 5, ch. 2004-11.
Note.Former s. 47.46.

F.S. 48.20 on Google Scholar

F.S. 48.20 on Casetext

Amendments to 48.20


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 48.20
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 48.20.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

IN RE BUKOVICS, v., 587 B.R. 695 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 2018)

. . . August 2009-November 2009 $0 deferment November 2009-May 2010 $0 forbearance March 2010 1 payment of $48.20 . . . SallieMae granted forbearance retroactive to November 2009, and Plaintiff made one payment of $48.20 . . .

FLAAEN, v. PRINCIPAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, INC., 226 F. Supp. 3d 1162 (W.D. Wash. 2016)

. . . terminology for basic benefits to be provided by disability insurance contracts which are subject to chapters 48.20 . . .

In ARMODAFINIL PATENT LITIGATION INC. PATENT LITIGATION v. v. v. v., 939 F. Supp. 2d 456 (D. Del. 2013)

. . . (citing Tr. at 185:16-18, 192:12-18 (Hollingsworth); Tr. at 303:16-18(Lee); JTX-48.20; Tr. at 777:18- . . .

BOANDL, v. F. GEITHNER,, 752 F. Supp. 2d 540 (E.D. Pa. 2010)

. . . members with ranking procedures and established a cut-off score for “best qualified” applicants of 48.20 . . . have achieved for either position was a 42.80, which fell below the “best qualified” cut-off scores of 48.20 . . .

v., 33 Ct. Int'l Trade 389 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2009)

. . . In relevant part, EN 48.20 explicitly states the heading includes “binders designed for holding loose . . . EN 48.20 (second emphasis added). . . . Crucially, EN 48.20 does not contain any language requiring that the merchandise be entirely or principally . . . EN 48.20. Customs examined the Federal Circuit’s decision in Mead Corp. . . . II for purposes of EN 48.20. [¶] 967329 at 3. . . .

GLOBAL SOURCING GROUP, INC. v. UNITED STATES,, 611 F. Supp. 2d 1367 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2009)

. . . In relevant part, EN 48.20 explicitly states the heading includes “binders designed for holding loose . . . EN 48.20 (second emphasis added). . . . Crucially, EN 48.20 does not contain any language requiring that the merchandise be entirely or principally . . . EN 48.20. . Customs examined the Federal Circuit’s decision in Mead Corp. . . . II for purposes of EN 48.20. HQ 967329 at 3. . . . .

CASTELLANO, v. YOUNG RUBICAM, INC., 257 F.3d 171 (2d Cir. 2001)

. . . 1, 1996, and Y & R exercised its option to repurchase his shares on the same day, at book value of $48.20 . . .

GARDINER, d b a v. VIRGIN ISLANDS WATER AND POWER AUTHORITY, 32 F. Supp. 2d 816 (D.V.I. 1999)

. . . The breakdown of costs is as follows: Witness Fee $ 289.00 Process Service $ 282.95 Ascii Disks $ 48.20 . . .

WASHINGTON PHYSICIANS SERVICE ASSOCIATION Of A a a a a a a a a a a v. O. GREGOIRE,, 967 F. Supp. 424 (W.D. Wash. 1997)

. . . Health Carriers,” which are defined in RCW 48.43.005(8) as “a disability insurer regulated under Chapter 48.20 . . .

COMISKY, v. ROSEN MANAGEMENT SERVICE, INC. a, 630 So. 2d 628 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . Section 48.20, Florida Statutes (1991) provides that service of process on a Sunday is void, and a motion . . .

G. BURTON, REPUBLICAN PARTY, T. v. J. SHEHEEN, A. E. T. Y. A. L. I. STATEWIDE REAPPORTIONMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE, v. A. CAMPBELL, Jr. I. BLANTON, A. E. Y. A. v. A. CAMPBELL, Jr., 793 F. Supp. 1329 (D.S.C. 1992)

. . . 59.15 62.51 58.61 0.43 0.77 39 59.97 55.66 59.18 55.25 60.39 56.51 -0.42 -0.85 40 54.02 51.49 50.69 48.20 . . . 53.90 59.85 55.15 -16.06 36 63.24 59.15 62.51 58.61 -11.81 39* 59.18 55.25 60.39 56.51 -12.47 40 50.69 48.20 . . .

In PERROTON, PERROTON, v. L. G. GRAY,, 958 F.2d 889 (9th Cir. 1992)

. . . See generally Singer, supra, at § 48.01-48.20 (discussing legislative history as an extrinsic aid). . . .

In PERROTON, PERROTON, v. L. G. GRAY,, 958 F.2d 889 (9th Cir. 1992)

. . . See generally Singer, supra, at § 48.01-48.20 (discussing legislative history as an extrinsic aid). . . .

NAVIS, v. FOND DU LAC COUNTY Du, 721 F. Supp. 182 (E.D. Wis. 1989)

. . . and legal custodian of the child are notified, or the child is delivered to an intake worker under s. 48.20 . . . Similarly, Wis.Stat. § 48.20(8) provides: The intake worker shall base his or her decision to hold a . . .

S. DOE, a M. a W. NELSON, M. A. V. E. v. MILWAUKEE COUNTY Ed, 712 F. Supp. 1370 (E.D. Wis. 1989)

. . . investigating officer shall take the child into custody and deliver the child to the intake worker under s. 48.20 . . . child into custody under s. 48.08(2) or 48.19(l)(c) and deliver the child to the intake worker under s. 48.20 . . .

CITY OF ATLANTA, v. BRINDERSON CORPORATION,, 799 F.2d 1541 (11th Cir. 1986)

. . . . § 48.20 (3d ed.); City of Hartford v. . . .

CITY OF HIALEAH, v. H. WEBER, s, 491 So. 2d 1204 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . See Larson’s, Workmen’s Compensation Law, § 48.20, et seq.; and City of Manchester v. . . .

In MINNESOTA KICKS, INC., 48 B.R. 93 (Bankr. D. Minn. 1985)

. . . . § 48.20 (1927). . . . .

W. MILLER, v. A. JOHNSON,, 466 So. 2d 340 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . COBB, Chief Judge, dissenting: There is an obvious conflict between sections 48.20 and 901.04, Florida . . . the broad construction applied by the circuit court to encompass the Sunday restrictions of section 48.20 . . . It logically follows that such an arrest is governed by the provisions of section 901.04, not 48.20, . . . Section 48.20, Florida Statutes provides: Service of process on Sunday. — Service or execution on Sunday . . . Lastly, section 48.20 says civil process cannot be served on a Sunday. A summons is “process.” . . .

WIGGINS BROTHERS, INC. v. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, B., 667 F.2d 77 (Temp. Emer. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . Chapter 48, §§ 48.01-48.20, 181-227. . . .

UNITED STATES v. LUBBOCK INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, 455 F. Supp. 1223 (N.D. Tex. 1978)

. . . 437 Program Capacity 626 Current Enrollment 2% Minority in ’54-55 27.57% “ “ ’61-62 39.16% “ “ ’62-63 48.20% . . .

A. LARAMORE, v. STATE, 342 So. 2d 90 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

. . . Section 48.20, Florida Statutes (1975) provides: “Service or execution on Sunday of any writ, process . . . justified by its explicit language, notwithstanding the absence of an affidavit satisfying Section 48.20 . . .

UNITED STATES v. MONTELONGO, 507 F.2d 639 (5th Cir. 1975)

. . . . 72-C-137 in the district court) charged Raul and Staley with possession with intent to distribute 48.20 . . . granas of heroin and, in a separate count, with distributing 48.20 grams of heroin. . . .

UNITED STATES v. DREIER, 307 F. Supp. 810 (S.D.N.Y. 1969)

. . . Stacey 1,018.49 48.20 48.20 $2,806.31 $410.96 The defendants have admitted that the taxpayers had withdrawn . . .

MERRITT- CHAPMAN SCOTT CORPORATION, v. PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NO. OF GRANT COUNTY, WASHINGTON,, 319 F.2d 94 (2d Cir. 1963)

. . . See 17 McQuillin, Municipal Corporations, Section 48.20, page 127 (3rd ed. 1950); Annot., 40 A.L.R. 1370 . . .

GAYLE v. JONES, 74 F. Supp. 262 (W.D. La. 1947)

. . . 1155.78 46.23 2.00 98.23 it tt tt tt 1938-39 1155.78 46.23 3.93 148.39 tt it tt tt 1939-40 1204.92 48.20 . . .

UNITED STATES v. CERTAIN LANDS IN TOWN OF HIGHLANDS, N. Y., 49 F. Supp. 962 (S.D.N.Y. 1943)

. . . Land and Cottage ' 2,480.00 XXXIII (48.20) Cragston Associates, Inc. . . . XXXIII (48.20) 3,320. XXXIV (48.21) 560. $9,300. . . .

NEW ENGLAND MUT. LIFE INS. CO. OF BOSTON, MASS. v. OLIN, 114 F.2d 131 (7th Cir. 1940)

. . . $143.70 and after deducting the share of surplus of $95.50 makes an automatic loan outstanding of $48.20 . . . September 15, 1931 to March 8, 1932 to be $44.97; computed interest on the automatic premium loan of $48.20 . . . to March 8, 1932 to be $1.27 (the figure of $48.20 represents the difference between $1,663.08 and the . . . applied the surplus of $95.50 reducing the unpaid premium and applied the automatic premium loan of $48.20 . . .

v., 37 B.T.A. 984 (B.T.A. 1938)

. . . percent of the preferred stock and 47.65 percent of the common stock of the Eex Manufacturing Co., or 48.20 . . .

BONE v. WALSH CONST. CO., 235 F. 901 (S.D. Iowa 1916)

. . . The other item asked to be taxed is $48.20 for certified copies of patents and publications. . . .

, 47 F. 744 (D. Cal. 1886)

. . . the entries in which he can verify by his oath The libelant is entitled to a decree for the sum of $48.20 . . .

v. v., 51 U.S. 1 (U.S. 1850)

. . . Course if. 88° E. 12.00 Prairie. 17.20 Field (Yeach) fence north and south. 48.20 Left field fence north . . .