Florida/Georgia Personal Injury & Workers Compensation

You're probably overthinking it. Call a lawyer.

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 6.04 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 6.04 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 6.04 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 6.04

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title II
STATE ORGANIZATION
Chapter 6
ADMISSION INTO UNION; CONCESSIONS; STATE BOUNDARIES
View Entire Chapter
6.04 Jurisdiction over such lands; how ceded to the United States.Whenever the United States shall contract for, purchase, or acquire any land within the limits of this state for the purposes aforesaid, in either of the modes above mentioned and provided, or shall hold for such purposes lands heretofore lawfully acquired or reserved therefor, and shall desire to acquire constitutional jurisdiction over such lands for said purposes, the Governor of this state may, upon application made to him or her in writing on behalf of the United States for that purpose, accompanied by the proper evidence of said reservation, purchase, contract, or acquisition of record, describing the land sought to be ceded by convenient metes and bounds, thereupon, in the name and on behalf of this state, cede to the United States exclusive jurisdiction over the land so reserved, purchased, or acquired and sought to be ceded; the United States to hold, use, occupy, own, possess, and exercise said jurisdiction over the same for the purposes aforesaid, and none other whatsoever; provided, always, that the consent aforesaid is hereby given and the cession aforesaid is to be granted and made as aforesaid, upon the express condition that this state shall retain a concurrent jurisdiction with the United States in and over the land or lands so to be ceded, and every portion thereof, so far that all process, civil or criminal, issuing under authority of this state, or of any of the courts or judicial officers thereof may be executed by the proper officers thereof, upon any person amenable to the same, within the limits and extent of lands so ceded, in like manner and to like effect as if this law had never been passed; saving, however, to the United States security to their property within said limits and extent, and exemption of the same, and of said lands from any taxation under the authority of this state while the same shall continue to be owned, held, used, and occupied by the United States for the purposes above expressed and intended, and not otherwise.
History.s. 3, ch. 25, 1845; RS 9; GS 7; RGS 7; CGL 7; s. 2, ch. 95-147.

F.S. 6.04 on Google Scholar

F.S. 6.04 on CourtListener

Amendments to 6.04


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 6.04

Total Results: 82  |  Sort by: Relevance  |  Newest First

Copy

United States v. Toler, 144 F.3d 1423 (11th Cir. 1998).

Cited 146 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 14781, 1998 WL 347566

Austin W. Scott, Jr., Substantive Criminal Law § 6.4 at 60 (1986). Because the crime of conspiracy is
Copy

M.G.B. Homes, Inc. v. Ameron Homes, Inc., & Daniel James Brognano, Rick Brognano & Richard Patton, 903 F.2d 1486 (11th Cir. 1990).

Cited 110 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 15 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1282, 16 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1441, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 10077, 1990 WL 75074

...If the process is simply one of assembling into a collective whole A’s and B’s respective contributions, without thereby recasting A’s contribution, then the two contributions may be said to be interdependent. 1 M. Nimmer and D. Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright § 6.04 at 6-11 (1989)....
Copy

Beck v. Prupis, 162 F.3d 1090 (11th Cir. 1998).

Cited 86 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1998 WL 870253

Austin W. Scott, Jr., Criminal Law § 6.4(d) (2d ed.1986). Agreements to engage in criminal
Copy

Owen v. State, 596 So. 2d 985 (Fla. 1992).

Cited 54 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1992 WL 10615

LaFave & Jerold H. Israel, Criminal Procedure § 6.4, at 468 (1984) ("[A]t least from the time defendant
Copy

Jean P. Lynch, Individually & on Behalf of All Persons Similarly Situated, Jesse M. Hughes, Intervening v. William J. Baxley, Etc., 744 F.2d 1452 (11th Cir. 1984).

Cited 53 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 17328

commit such person. (Acts 1975, No. 1226, § 6.) 4 . The court noted that while Lynch was
Copy

Huckelbury v. State, 337 So. 2d 400 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976).

Cited 50 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal

Integration Rule of the Florida Bar, Art. 18, § 6. [4] The correlation between moral character and the
Copy

United States v. Vaghela, 169 F.3d 729 (11th Cir. 1999).

Cited 34 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 4100, 1999 WL 133028

Austin W. Scott, Jr., Substantive Criminal Law § 6.4, at 60 (1986). To be guilty of conspiracy, in other
Copy

State v. City of Pensacola, 166 So. 851 (Fla. 1936).

Cited 33 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 123 Fla. 331, 1936 Fla. LEXIS 979

issued under the provisions of this resolution. "SECTION 6. 4 1/2% Refunding Bonds of 1935 numbered 1 to 125
Copy

Bank of New York v. Sunshine-Jr. Stores, Inc. (In Re Sunshine-Jr. Stores, Inc.), 456 F.3d 1291 (11th Cir. 2006).

Cited 33 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 17990, 46 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 224

John G. Grimsley, Fla. Law of Trusts § 6-4 (4th ed. 1993). Here, BONY held the Debtor’s
Copy

Bancroft Inv. Corp. v. City of Jacksonville, 27 So. 2d 162 (Fla. 1946).

Cited 27 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 157 Fla. 546, 1946 Fla. LEXIS 800

...ldings” should be exempt from “any taxation under the authority of this state while the same shall continue to be owned, held, used and occupied by the United States for the purposes above- expressed and intended, and not otherwise.”. See Sec. 6.04 Florida Statutes, 1941....
...f the United States and of this state ...” Both section 3, chapter 25, Laws of 1845 and section 4, chapter 4322, Laws of 1895, have been extended on the statute books of Florida throughout the years, without material change or modification. See Secs. 6.04, 192.06(1), Florida Statutes 1941....
Copy

Jacksonville Port Auth. v. Alamo Rent-A-Car, Inc., 600 So. 2d 1159 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992).

Cited 16 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1992 WL 102914

...63-1447, Laws of Fla., as amended by Ch. 67-1533, Laws of Fla. [2] Charter, Art. 5, §§ 3(7), 6. [3] Charter, Art. 5, § 6. [4] The remaining two sub-issues related to alleged violations of section 542.19, Florida Statutes (1989) (anti-trust) and section 286.043, Florida Statutes (1989) (bid preclusion)....
Copy

United States v. Toler, 144 F.3d 1423 (11th Cir. 1998).

Cited 16 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Austin W. Scott, Jr., Substantive Criminal Law § 6.4 at fashion, uses the term “conspiracy” to define
Copy

Island Silver & Spice, Inc. v. Islamorada, 542 F.3d 844 (11th Cir. 2008).

Cited 15 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 19143, 2008 WL 4118104

uniform, or similar standardized feature. (Id. at § 6.4.1(e).) Island Silver owns and operates an independent
Copy

Mid-Fla Coin Exch., Inc. v. Griffin, 529 F. Supp. 1006 (M.D. Fla. 1981).

Cited 13 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10002

authority. L. Tribe, American Constitutional Law § 6-4 (1978). The focus is upon the subject matter of
Copy

Cachia v. Islamorada, 542 F.3d 839 (11th Cir. 2008).

Cited 11 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 19158, 2008 WL 4118147

menu; or (3) is a fast food restaurant. (Id. at § 6.4.1(d).) The ordinance states that "[f]ormula restaurants
Copy

Matter of Lawson, 67 B.R. 94 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1986).

Cited 10 times | Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida

...# 2) and also contains an anti-assignment provision. Section 6.01 of the ESOP provides that the shares in a participant's account may be distributed only upon retirement, death or termination of employment (Defendant's Exh. # 1) with one exception. The exception is contained in Section 6.04 of ESOP (Defendant's Exh....
Copy

In re Senate Jt. Resolution of Legislative Apportionment 1176, 83 So. 3d 597 (Fla. 2012).

Cited 10 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 37 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 181, 2012 Fla. LEXIS 507, 2012 WL 753122

Colo. Const, art. V, § 47; Haw. Const, art. IV, § 6(4); Ill. Const, art. IV, § 3(a); Me. Const, art. IV
Copy

Jones v. Cont'l Ins., 670 F. Supp. 937 (S.D. Fla. 1987).

Cited 9 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9092

...at hand). [10] Florida courts presume that the legislature is aware of the case law pertaining to matters it is legislating. Ford v. Wainwright, 451 So.2d 471 (Fla.1984). [11] See also W. Shernoff, S. Gage & H. Levine, Insurance Bad Faith Litigation § 6.04(3) (1986) wherein the author states: One state, Florida, has enacted statutory provisions expressly authorizing a private civil action for damages against an insurer who commits various unfair claims settlement practices [footnote citation to Fla.Stat....
Copy

Waters v. Int'l Precious Metals Corp., 237 F.3d 1273 (11th Cir. 2001).

Cited 9 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 188, 2001 WL 15325

distributions from the settlement fund. Relying on § 6.4(c)-(d), the court found that the Agreement contemplated
Copy

Mansur v. Eubanks, 368 So. 2d 645 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979).

Cited 8 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

...(e.s.) Assumption of risk, as the Blackburn decision observed, may or may not, depending on the circumstances, be equivalent to contributory negligence. While the two may, on occasions, overlap, or one may exist without the other, 1 Dooley, Modern Tort Law § 6.04 at 156 (1977), both have distinct meanings....
Copy

Escobar v. State, 181 So. 2d 193 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965).

Cited 8 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 17 A.L.R. 3d 1390

bank account. See: 2 American Law of Property, § 6.4, p. 16 (1952). No one had a special property interest
Copy

Novick v. Dep't of Health, 816 So. 2d 1237 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002).

Cited 7 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2002 WL 1070896

through growth is contemplated by the agreement. Section 6.4 provides that PPA will assist Interlachen to
Copy

DSR, Inc. v. Manuel (In Re Hamilton Roe Int'l, Inc.), 162 B.R. 590 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1993).

Cited 6 times | Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | 7 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 327, 1993 Bankr. LEXIS 2019, 1993 WL 554005

...[1] Damages must receive the priority provided general unsecured creditors as stated in the Bankruptcy Code. Although prohibiting competition is of concern to Plaintiff's business, it is not relevant to the Court in determining Plaintiff's present interest in the software. The noncompete provision contained in section 6.04, if it is a material obligation at all, applies only to the Seller....
Copy

Lyons v. Georgia-Pac. Corp. Salaried Employees Ret. Plan, 221 F.3d 1235 (11th Cir. 2000).

Cited 6 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 47 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 520, 24 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2473, 86 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5601, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 19180, 2000 WL 1140673

immediately, as he was permitted to do under section 6.4(a) of the Plan. Consistent with the Plan’s payout
Copy

Pesut v. Miller, 773 So. 2d 1185 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2000 WL 1744870

performed by special masters. See, e.g., art. V, § 6(4), Fla. Const. (1969); art. V, § 14; Fla. Const.
Copy

Lord v. Local Union No. 2088, 481 F. Supp. 419 (M.D. Fla. 1979).

Cited 5 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 103 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2695, 1979 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8274

...ess does not affect this conclusion. United States v. State Tax Commission of Mississippi, 412 U.S. 363, 371-72, 93 S.Ct. 2183, 37 L.Ed.2d 1 (1973). The cessions were all made with the consent of the Florida Legislature, which is given by Fla. Stat. § 6.04 [7] when a deed of cession is signed by the Governor of the State, as was the case here....
...s of the State where such lands are situated. Unless and until the United States has accepted jurisdiction over lands hereafter to be acquired as aforesaid, it shall be conclusively presumed that no such jurisdiction has been accepted. [7] Fla.Stat. § 6.04 provides: Jurisdiction over such lands; now ceded to the United States....
Copy

Reaves v. State, 979 So. 2d 1066 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2008 WL 828953

cause." Wayne R. LaFave, Substantive Criminal Law § 6.4(h) (3d ed. 2003).
Copy

Bullington v. State, 616 So. 2d 1036 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 1993 WL 72061

W. LaFave, A. Scott, Substantive Criminal Law § 6.4, at 76 (1986); Lavette v. State, 442 So.2d 265 (Fla
Copy

Lopez-Vazquez v. State, 931 So. 2d 231 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2006 WL 1649020

regard for human life. Fla. Std. Jury Instr. (Crim.) § 6.4., at 1744 (emphasis added). We believe that the
Copy

S. Christian Leadership Conf. v. Sessions, 56 F.3d 1281 (11th Cir. 1995).

Cited 5 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 14638

electoral geography. See Ala. Const, amend. 328, § 6.04(b); Ala.Code § 12-11-30 (1993). These constitutional
Copy

Hazealeferiou v. Labor Ready, 947 So. 2d 599 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2007 WL 29236

Patrick John McGinley, Florida Workers' Compensation § 6.4 (2006 ed.). Distinguishing the relevant employer
Copy

Johnson v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co., 339 F. Supp. 1178 (M.D. Fla. 1972).

Cited 4 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14949

automatic sprinkler system in accordance with Section 6-4."
Copy

Lowery v. State, 402 So. 2d 1287 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal

further negotiation. 1 S. Gard, Florida Evidence § 6:04 (1980). Under this rationale, this portion of the
Copy

Westgate Tabernacle, Inc. v. Palm Beach Cnty., 14 So. 3d 1027 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 5431, 2009 WL 1393429

is by right and requires no prior approval. ULDC § 6.4.C.1 (1995). Class B conditional uses are permitted
Copy

Hill v. Deering Bay Marina Ass'n, Inc., 985 So. 2d 1162 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2008 WL 2511348

section 5.4; "Slip Lease or Use Agreement," section 6.4 (providing that costs and fees were to be charged
Copy

Waggy v. State, 935 So. 2d 571 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2006 WL 2056441

...ount, concurrently. Id. In his motion for postconviction relief, the appellant asserts his charged offenses in lower tribunal case number 01-5314 were committed over fifteen years ago at a residential housing unit on Naval Air Station, Jacksonville. Section 6.04, Florida Statutes (1977), provides in pertinent part: Whenever the United States shall contract for, purchase, or acquire any land within the limits of this state for the purposes aforesaid, in either of the modes above mentioned and pro...
...the land or lands so to be ceded, and every portion thereof, so far that all process, civil or criminal, issuing under authority of this state, or of any of the courts or judicial officers thereof may be executed by the proper officers, thereof.... Section 6.04, Florida Statutes, grants the federal government exclusive jurisdiction over government owned territories which have been expressly ceded through application to the state governor, except those areas of concurrent jurisdiction regarding civil and criminal process....
...Thus, the appellant's assertion that the state lacked subject matter jurisdiction to try him for crimes occurring wholly on a military installation with exclusive federal jurisdiction may have merit depending on whether a state governor previously ceded NAS Jacksonville to the federal government as outlined in section 6.04, Florida Statutes....
Copy

Archstone Palmetto Park, LLC v. Kennedy, 132 So. 3d 347 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2014 WL 305086, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 1017

...before June 1, 2011. Accordingly, we reverse the declaratory judgment with instructions for the trial court to enter a declaratory judgment in accordance with this opinion. Reversed and remanded. MAY and CIKLIN, JJ„ concur. . Read in conjunction, Section 6.04 of the City’s Charter provides the means of commencing such proceedings, providing as follows: Any five (5) qualified voters may commence initiative or referendum proceedings by filing with the city clerk an affidavit stating that they...
Copy

Island Silver & Spice, Inc. v. Islamorada, Vill. of Islands, 475 F. Supp. 2d 1281 (S.D. Fla. 2007).

Cited 3 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13939, 2007 WL 624080

"formula retail" establishment as described by § 6.4.1(e) of the Ordinance. The drug store operated by
Copy

Dibiccari v. Lockheed Martin Ret. Plan, 244 F. Supp. 2d 1308 (M.D. Fla. 2002).

Cited 2 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26149, 2002 WL 31995677

...e to receive that benefit for the duration of the disability or until reaching age 65, whichever happens first. At age 65, a disability retiree converts to a retiree and receives a normal retirement benefit without regard to disability status. Plan, § 6.04(d)....
Copy

Blaine v. N. Brevard Cnty. Hosp. Dist., 312 F. Supp. 3d 1295 (M.D. Fla. 2018).

Cited 2 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida

in its Bylaws. (See id. ¶ 19 (citing Doc. 1-2, § 6.4 (Bylaws Reappointment Process) ).) Since their initial
Copy

In Re Chiquita Brands Int'l, Inc., 792 F. Supp. 2d 1301 (S.D. Fla. 2011).

Cited 2 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida

Prosecutor v. Akayesu, Judgment, No. ICTR-96-4-T § 6.4. (Sept. 2, 1998)); see also Talisman, 453 F.Supp
Copy

Wernle v. Bellemead Dev. Corp., 308 So. 2d 97 (Fla. 1975).

Cited 2 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida

established by the Constitution of 1885, Article VIII, Section 6.[4] The remaining question is whether these two
Copy

Burgess v. Prince, 25 So. 3d 705 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 405, 2010 WL 199422

compensation to a Trustee serving in other capacities. Section 6.4 empowers the Trustee: [T]o employ accountants
Copy

City of Ocala v. Marion Cty. Police, 392 So. 2d 26 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

...s, supports a conclusion that PERC fully performed its statutory duties in a manner complying with due process requirements. § 447.503(4)(a). Discontinuance of Wage Merit Increases. In 1969, City initiated a merit pay system adopting Personnel Rule 6.04 which provided: 6.04 Salary Increases....
...rsonnel evaluation specifying the employees [sic] exceptional performance. Salary increases or decreases resulting from the overall adjustment of salary grades shall not prevent within grade increases in accordance with this section. A similar rule, § 6.04, is incorporated in City's Police Department Rules and Regulations....
Copy

Beck v. Prupis, 162 F.3d 1090 (11th Cir. 1998).

Cited 2 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

LaFave & Austin W. Scott, Jr., Criminal Law § 6.4(d) (2d ed. 1986). Agreements to engage in criminal
Copy

Yusem v. Butler, 966 So. 2d 405 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2007 WL 2316935

being completed or leased-up as required under Section 6.4 of the partnership agreement. Butler alleged
Copy

Marina v. Leahy, 578 So. 2d 382 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 1991 WL 55690

...Leahy, received a sworn written statement from an elector residing in the city, challenging Marina's qualifications and specifically alleging that Marina was not a resident of the City of Sweetwater for six months prior to qualifying for the election, as required by the Sweetwater Code, Section 6.04. Section 6.04 of the Sweetwater Code requires that candidates for city office have been residents of the city at least six months prior to the date of qualification for office and states specifically that: (a) Registration books shall open for qualifi...
...qualified as a candidate. The trial court held an emergency evidentiary hearing, and determined that Marina was not a resident of the City of Sweetwater six months prior to qualifying as a candidate for mayor of the City of Sweetwater as mandated by § 6.04 of the City of Sweetwater Charter....
...denied, 358 So.2d 129 (Fla. 1978). The trial court specifically found that; "Mr. Evaristo `Ever' Marina was not a resident of the City of Sweetwater six (6) months prior to qualifying as a candidate for Mayor of the City of Sweetwater as mandated by § 6.04 of the City of Sweetwater Charter." The statement of facts in Marina's brief candidly admits that there was conflicting evidence and testimony as to Marina's residency during the critical period. Thus, there is substantial support for the trial court's factual determination that Marina was not a qualified candidate. Secondly, Marina challenges Section 6.04 of the Sweetwater Code....
Copy

Gulf Power Co. v. Coalsales II, L.L.C., 661 F. Supp. 2d 1270 (N.D. Fla. 2009).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court, N.D. Florida | 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95949, 2009 WL 3190459

...Thus, the court rejects Coalsales' argument that the provisions of the contract *1278 would be meaningless if the CSA were not a sole source agreement. [24] Coalsales further argues that it had the right, but not the obligation, to supply coal to Gulf Power from other approved sources. Section 6.04 provides, in relevant part: "[Coalsales] shall have the right to supply the coal to be delivered hereunder from the Paso Diablo Mine, (Source A), State of Zulia, Venezuela; the Galatia Mine, (Source B), Saline County, State of Illinois;...
...apable of clearly and unambiguously stating their intentions within the contract. [21] Coalsales identifies these thirty-two provisions as Sections 2.05, 2.06, 2.07, 2.10, 2.12, 2.16, 2.20, 2.22, 2.23, 2.27, 2.28, 2.30, 2.34, 5.02, 5.03, 5.08, 6.02, 6.04, 6.05, 7.01, 7.02, 8.01, 8.02, 9.01, 9.04, 9.06, 9.07, 11.01, 14.02, 14.06, 15.01, and 19.01. [22] Of the sections Coalsales refers to, Sections 2.06, 2.07, 2.10, 2.12, 2.16, 2.20, 2.27, 2.28, 2.34, 5.03, 8.01, 8.02, 9.04, 9.06, 11.01, 14.02, 14.03, 14.06 and 19.01 do not mention Source A or Source B. Coalsales also refers to Sections 6.04, which describes Source C, and 6.05, which describes "other sources," as support for its sole source interpretation. Finally, Coalsales refers to Sections 2.22, 2.23, 2.30, 6.02, 7.01, 7.02, 9.07 and 15.01, which either mention sources other than Source A and Source B directly or refer to Sections 6.04 and 6.05....
...For example, Section 11.01 contains a billing formula which refers to a number of terms, such as the Outbound Loading Point, which are variable rather than fixed. [23] Section 6.02 provides, in relevant part: "It is anticipated that the approximate Annual Quality under this Agreement from Source A (Section 6.04) will be 1,000,000 Tons and from Source B (Section 6.04) 900,000 tons." Similarly, Section 7.02 provides, in relevant part: "It is anticipated that the primary source of coal under this Agreement shall be a blend of coals from Source A and Source B." (emphasis added)....
Copy

Wright v. Frankel, 965 So. 2d 365 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2007 WL 2847951

...Any initiated ordinance may be submitted to the City Commission by petition signed by at least five (5) percent of the City electors as shown by the current voter registration lists. Section 6.03 of the City Charter lists the technical requirements that all petition papers circulated for the purpose of initiative must meet. Section 6.04 sets forth the procedure that must be followed for the filing, examination and certification of all initiated petitions....
Copy

Cockrell v. Lewis, 389 So. 2d 307 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal

state death taxes actually paid... .' Ind. Code § 6-4.1-11-1 (1976). Under Indiana law, `state death taxes'
Copy

Vill. of Wellington v. Palm Beach Cnty., 941 So. 2d 595 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2006 WL 3373045

in Ray v. Mortham, 742 So.2d 1276 (Fla.1999). Section 6.4 of the Palm Beach County Charter, entitled "Savings
Copy

Mehdipour v. Rensin (In re Rensin), 600 B.R. 870 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 2019).

Cited 1 times | Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida.

annuity contract, the fixed annuity contract omits section 6.4, the operative provision for surrender of the
Copy

Stallworth v. Wells Fargo Armored Servs. Corp., 936 F.2d 522 (11th Cir. 1991).

Cited 1 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 15609, 56 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40, 899, 56 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 618, 1991 WL 117292

(11th Cir.1981). . The parties represent that § 6.4(b) of the EEOC Compliance Manual provides that a
Copy

City of Cocoa Beach v. Vacation Beach, Inc., 876 So. 2d 719 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 9718, 29 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1564

...Buildings in existence, or with an approved construction permit on or before July 19, 2001, may be repaired or rebuilt to a habitable density equivalent to the previously existing density.... Those parts of any ordinances in conflict with this section are hereby repealed. Section 6.04, the second proposed amendment on the ballot, pertained to building height limit and provided: No structure, no part of any structure, and no attachment to any structure shall be erected to a height greater than forty-five (45) feet above the grade of the building site....
Copy

Washington Mut. Bank, F.A. v. Am. Fin. Network, 414 F. Supp. 2d 1155 (S.D. Fla. 2006).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7628, 2006 WL 330492

the making and hearing of motions[.]" 9 U.S.C. § 6. [4] Although the parties' Agreement does not, by
Copy

Garcia v. Lopez, 483 So. 2d 470 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 11 Fla. L. Weekly 422, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6503

90.95 l(4)(a). See 1 S. Gard, Florida Evidence § 6:04 (2d ed. 1980) (difficult question whether an unexecuted
Copy

City of Cocoa Beach v. Vacation Beach, Inc., 852 So. 2d 358 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 12205, 2003 WL 21946462

...uly 19, 2001, may be repaired or rebuilt to a habitable density equivalent to the previously existing density. * * * Those parts of any ordinances in conflict with this section are hereby repealed. (Emphasis added). The second proposed amendment, to section 6.04, would establish building height limits of forty-five (45) feet. Its material provisions are as follows: Sec. 6.04....
...City is correct that neither charter amendment is a "land development regulation," which is defined as "an ordinance enacted by a local governing body ...." § 163.3213(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (2001). An "ordinance" is legislative action of the governing body. § 166.041(1)(a), Fla....
Copy

Tubbs v. Hudec, 8 So. 3d 1194 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 3436, 2009 WL 1066297

Am., 977 So.2d 630, 632 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008). Section 6.4 of article VI of the stock purchase agreement
Copy

CDC Builders, Inc. v. Biltmore-Sevilla Debt Investors, LLC, 151 So. 3d 479 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 14385, 2014 WL 4628515

Restatement (Third) of Property (Mortgages) § 6.4 cmt. e (1997) (internal citations omitted).
Copy

Kojo Khayrallah v. State of Florida (Fla. 1st DCA 2022).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

(quoting 1 W. LAFAVE, SUBSTANTIVE CRIMINAL LAW § 6.4(a), 464–466 (2d ed. 2003)). To put a finer point
Copy

Mukamal v. D.R. Horton, Inc. (In re Majorca Isles Master Ass'n), 560 B.R. 824 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 2016).

Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | 26 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 179, 2016 Bankr. LEXIS 3797

“deficit funding”. See Master Declaration at Section 6.4; Section 720.308, Florida Statutes. D.R. Horton
Copy

In Re Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc., 356 B.R. 813 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2006).

Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | 20 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 202, 2006 Bankr. LEXIS 3260, 2006 WL 3543154

of Evidences of Indebtedness. As provided in Section 6.4 Of the Plan, except as otherwise provided in
Copy

Tambay Tr., Inc. v. Florida Progress Corp. (In re Lawson), 67 B.R. 94 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1986).

Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | 1986 Bankr. LEXIS 4996

...# 2) and also contains an anti-assignment provision. Section 6.01 of the ESOP provides that the shares in a participant’s account may be distributed only upon retirement, death or termination of employment (Defendant’s Exh. # 1) with one exception. The exception is contained in Section 6.04 of ESOP (Defendant’s Exh....
Copy

Conservation All. v. United States Dep't of Transp., 145 F. Supp. 3d 1198 (S.D. Fla. 2015).

Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 157599, 2015 WL 7351544

alternatives), Section 6.3 (Measures to minimize harm), Section 6.4 (Use of Section 4(f) properties), and Section
Copy

Int'l Bus. Machines Corp. v. Vaughn, 98 So. 2d 747 (Fla. 1957).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida

...nt Section 1, Article IX, supra, carries the simple provision for the exemption from taxation of property, real and personal, of the United States. Since the enactment of Chapter 25, Laws of Florida, Acts of 1845, now designated as Sections 6.02 and 6.04, Florida Statutes 1955, and F.S.A., provision has existed for deeds of cession from the Governor to the United States saving to the United States exemption from state taxation of the property of the United States....
...Nor can we accept the view that saving to the United States security from taxation did by implication reserve to the state the right to tax the property involved. A comparison of the above language already quoted from the deed and that appearing in Section 6.04, supra, will demonstrate that there was no intention to put in the deed any reservation other than the one established by the legislature as a condition precedent to the validity of such a grant....
...for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings * * The words italicized by us are substantially the same as those recited in the deed of cession. They also appear in Section 6.02, supra. A following statute, Section 6.04, supra, authorizes the Governor to cede jurisdiction over land acquired by the United States Government for such uses and, as we have already indicated, the deed under study contained a recital that it was executed by the Governor under the appropriate statutes....
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 2005).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

accordance with Chapter 191, Florida Statutes.5 Section 6(4), Chapter 00-477, Laws of Florida, provides:
Copy

City of Miami v. Miami Lodge 20, Fraternal Order of Police, 247 So. 3d 618 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

the Election of Remedy form provided for in Section 6.4 of this Article before initiating the grievance
Copy

Ross v. State, 411 So. 2d 247 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19355

...Affirmed. . Article I, Section 8, clause 17, of the United States Constitution empowers the United States to acquire lands from the states for certain specified uses, namely forts, magazines, arsenals, dock-yards and other needful buildings. Sections 6.04 and 6.05, Florida Statutes (1979), provide the procedure by which the State of Florida cedes lands to the United States....
...tate where such lands are situated. Unless and until the United States has accepted jurisdiction over lands hereañer to be acquired as aforesaid, it shall be conclusively presumed that no such jurisdiction has been accepted.” (emphasis supplied). Section 6.04, Florida Statutes (1979), provides that the Governor may cede jurisdiction to the Federal Government “upon application made to him in writing on behalf of the United States for that purpose, accompanied by the proper evidence of said reservation, purchase, contract or acquisition of record ......
Copy

United States v. Vaghela, 169 F.3d 729 (11th Cir. 1999).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

AUSTIN W. SCOTT, JR., SUBSTANTIVE CRIMINAL LAW § 6.4 at 60 (1986). To be guilty of conspiracy, in other
Copy

Hill v. Deering Bay Marina Ass'n, 985 So. 2d 1162 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 9441

section 5.4; “Slip Lease or Use Agreement," section 6.4 (providing that costs and fees were to be charged
Copy

Lexington Place Condo. Ass'n, Inc., a Florida Corp. Not for Profit Vs Michelle Flint & Kevin Flint (Fla. 5th DCA 2022).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal

common elements was governed and restricted by Section 6.4 which states: 6.4 Material Alterations
Copy

City of Miami v. Emilio Tomas Gonzalez (Fla. 3d DCA 2025).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

...Article VI, section 6.03(A) requires any municipal charter amendment to be submitted to the electorate for approval: 2 Article VI, section 6.03, included in the original 1957 County Home Rule Charter, has never been amended. 5 Except as provided in Section 6.04 [for changes to municipal boundaries], any municipality in the county may adopt, amend, or revoke a charter for its own government or abolish its existence in the following manner....
Copy

Crsj, Inc. v. Miami-dade Cnty. (Fla. 3d DCA 2021).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

...omy conferred on Dade County by the Home Rule Amendment, with the result that the method provided therefor by the Home Rule Charter, pursuant to authorization by the Home Rule Amendment, is effective and exclusive . . . .” (citations omitted)). Section 6.04 of the Charter, governing changes in municipal boundaries, provides that proposed boundary changes may be initiated by the governing body of a municipality. Section 6.04 further provides: B....
Copy

Waters v. Intl. Precious Metals, 237 F.3d 1273 (11th Cir. 2001).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

distributions from the settlement fund. Relying on § 6.4(c)-(d), the court found that the Agreement contemplated
Copy

State of Florida v. Christopher Markus, 211 So. 3d 894 (Fla. 2017).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 42 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 98, 2017 WL 411335, 2017 Fla. LEXIS 233

premises within thirty minutes of its initiation); § 6-4 (possession of a glass container while on the beach);
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1979).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

and building permit required of other persons. Section 6(4), Ch. 79-200. The local governing body may not
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1975).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

PEGCA), which became a law on July 9, 1969. Section 6(4)(a) of the act authorizes the issuance of bonds
Copy

Jerry L. Lyons v. Georgia-Pac. Corp., 221 F.3d 1235 (11th Cir. 2000).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

B. Facts 4 Under the Plan at Section 6.4(a), “Option C” is: A single lump sum
Copy

Russo v. Lorenzo, 67 So. 3d 1165 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 12477, 2011 WL 3476922

...Section 6.02 addresses the retirement benefit in the event the officer takes early retirement and thereafter dies. Section 6.03 addresses the retirement benefit in the event of the officer’s disability and death subsequent to disability retirement. Section 6.04(a) addresses the retirement benefit in the event the officer’s services are terminated for any reason other than his death. Sections 6.04(b) and (c), as amended, address the benefit payable in the event of the officer’s death on or before his normal retirement date while not in the line of duty and while in the line of duty, respectively. See City of N. Miami Beach, Fla., Ordinance 2005-6 (Apr. 5, 2005). Officer Lorenzo’s wife was being paid pursuant to section 6.04(c), which provides as follows: § 6.04 BENEFITS OTHER THAN ON RETIREMENT [[Image here]] (c) Benefit Payable in Event of Death On-Duty or In Line of Duty, On or Prior to Normal Retirement Date....
...(1) Effective July 1, 2004, the monthly retirement income payable upon the death of a participant who is survived by a spouse and/or dependent child(ren), and whose death occurs while the participant is on duty or in the line of duty shall be the greater of (i) the monthly retirement income determined in accordance with Subsection 6.04(b) above, [entitled “Benefit Payable in Event of Non-Service Related Death on or Prior to Normal Retirement Date while in Service”] and (ii) 60% of the participant’s final monthly compensation at the date of the death of the participant....
...*1169 Unlike life insurance, which is procured by the payment of a premium, the benefit created by the City’s retirement plan is paid in consideration of the decedent’s service to the City and participation in the retirement plan — much like a pension. Section 6.04(c), the subsection pursuant to which the benefit was being paid the wife, speaks in terms of the “monthly retirement income” payable to the beneficiary and provides a methodology for calculating the amount to be paid. And, the provisions of section 6 as a whole make it clear that, in the event of an officer’s death prior to his normal retirement date, the sole “monthly retirement” benefit to be paid by the City is that set forth in sections 6.04(b)[death prior to retirement and not in line of duty] and (c)[death prior to retirement and in line of duty]. The benefits provided by sections 6.04(b) and (c) are not in addition to some other pension or retirement income payable to the beneficiary under the plan. Consequently, the wife could not have been entitled to receive the benefit paid pursuant to section 6.04(c) and the full value of the pension her husband would have received had he lived and retired at normal retirement age. We recognize that the preamble to the Ordinance enacting the section 6.04(c) amendment stated that “the City Council has determined that it would be in the best interest of the participants of the Retirement Plan to provide a minimum death benefit for the beneficiaries of participants who die while on duty or in the line of duty....” Id....
Copy

Dist. Lodge 57 of the Int'l Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers v. Talisman Sugar Corp., 352 So. 2d 62 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 15406

bargaining agent is granted the appellant under Section 6.4 On the basis of the latter two points, the petition
Copy

City of Miami v. Fraternal Order of Police, Miami Lodge No. 20 (Fla. 3d DCA 2023).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

yet been terminated. Preliminarily, section 6.4 of the CBA reads, in pertinent part, “[s]election
Copy

Florida Bar re Amendment to Rules Regulating the Florida Bar, Rule 6-12.1, 524 So. 2d 634 (Fla. 1988).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 13 Fla. L. Weekly 277, 1988 Fla. LEXIS 501, 1988 WL 37916

continuing legal education credit in accordance with section 6.04(a) of the CLER policies as approved by BCDE

This Florida statute resource is curated by Graham W. Syfert, Esq., a Jacksonville, Florida personal injury and workers' compensation attorney. For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.