Florida/Georgia Personal Injury & Workers Compensation

You're probably overthinking it. Call a lawyer.

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 8.02 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 8.02 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 8.02 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 8.02

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title II
STATE ORGANIZATION
Chapter 8
CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS
View Entire Chapter
8.02 New counties.When any new counties are created, such new counties shall become a part of the congressional district in which the territory for such new county is located.
History.s. 6, ch. 6472, 1913; RGS 69; CGL 85; s. 7, ch. 16876, 1935; s. 8, ch. 21975, 1943; s. 10, ch. 26484, 1951.

F.S. 8.02 on Google Scholar

F.S. 8.02 on CourtListener

Amendments to 8.02


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 8.02

Total Results: 85  |  Sort by: Relevance  |  Newest First

Copy

Underwriters at Lloyd's, London v. Osting-Schwinn, 613 F.3d 1079 (11th Cir. 2010).

Cited 214 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 16746, 2010 WL 3056606

through underwriting agents. Lloyd's Act, 1982, c. 14 § 8(2). Lead underwriters, or active underwriters, serve
Copy

United States v. Augustin Gonzalez, 71 F.3d 819 (11th Cir. 1996).

Cited 200 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 125, 1996 WL 193

— A Treatise on the Fourth Amendment § 8.2(a) at 180 (1987) (when the police state that they
Copy

United States v. Delancy, 502 F.3d 1297 (11th Cir. 2007).

Cited 110 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2007 WL 2846403

others. See 4 Wayne R. LaFave, Search and Seizure § 8.2(d) (4th ed.2004) (discussing additional factors
Copy

Georgia Latino All. for Human Rights v. Governor of Georgia, 691 F.3d 1250 (11th Cir. 2012).

Cited 98 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2012 WL 3553612, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 17514

argument in this preenforcement challenge to section 8. 2. Equitable Factors The State Officers
Copy

United States v. Robert Blackman, Marvin Hinsey, Kenny Thompson, Salathiel Calvin Thompson, 66 F.3d 1572 (11th Cir. 1995).

Cited 85 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 43 Fed. R. Serv. 211, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 29772, 1995 WL 584712

and Seizure-A Treatise of the Fourth Amendment § 8.2(a) at 180 (2d ed. 1987) (hereinafter “LaFave”).
Copy

Am. Key Corp., & Ron Deweese v. Cole Nat'l Corp., & Sears, Roebuck & Co., 762 F.2d 1569 (11th Cir. 1985).

Cited 78 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 18 Fed. R. Serv. 458, 2 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 614, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 30632

...lers of the particular product or service operate.” (emphasis in original) Proof of the relevant product and geographic market is absolutely essential to appellants’ Section 2 claims. See, 3 Von Kalinowski, Antitrust Laws and Trade Regulation, §§ 8.02[1], 9.01[1] (1983); In re Municipal Bond Reporting Antitrust Litigation, 672 F.2d at 441....
...at 1593 , 3 Von Kalinowski, Antitrust Laws and Trade Regulation, § 9.02[2]-[3] (1983); specific intent to monopolize is a necessary element of a Section 2 offense of actual monopolization, Id. at § 9.01(1). Monopoly power is a critical element of a Section 2 offense of actual monopolization, Id. at § 8.02(1)....
...at 1593 ; In re Municipal Bond Reporting Antitrust Litigation, 672 F.2d 436 (5th Cir.1982); Joe Regueira, Inc. v. American Distilling Co., Inc., 642 F.2d 826, 832 (5th Cir. Unit B, 1981). 7 Von Kalinowski, Antitrust Laws and Trade Regulation, §§ 58.02(1), 9.01(1) (1983); Sausalito Pharmacy, Inc....
Copy

United States v. Svete, 556 F.3d 1157 (11th Cir. 2009).

Cited 55 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 2061, 2009 WL 225254

of fraud.” 1 Joel Androphy, White Collar Crime § 8:2.70 (2d ed.2006). In the years since we decided Brown
Copy

Allan C. Aldridge v. Lily-Tulip, Inc. Salary Ret. Plan Benefits Comm., 953 F.2d 587 (11th Cir. 1992).

Cited 38 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

(emphasis added)." PBGC Brief at 13-14. Section 8.2 of the Plan, consistent with section 411(d)(3)
Copy

Saavedra v. State, 622 So. 2d 952 (Fla. 1993).

Cited 37 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1993 WL 184571

and Seizure: A Treatise on the Fourth Amendment § 8.2 n. 7 (2d ed. 1987). The United States Supreme Court
Copy

Bank of New York v. Sunshine-Jr. Stores, Inc. (In Re Sunshine-Jr. Stores, Inc.), 456 F.3d 1291 (11th Cir. 2006).

Cited 33 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 17990, 46 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 224

...was an Indenture Trustee, we address the question of what obligations, if any, BONY had to the Debtor. The Debtor asserts that the role of Indenture Trustee terminated when it transferred the Prepayment Funds to NationsBank, and that pursuant to Section 8.02 of the Trust Indenture Agreement, NationsBank held those funds in a common law trust....
...they “shall not be deemed to be part of the Collateral or Trust Moneys.” The trust into which the Prepayment Funds had to be placed, therefore, was separate and distinct from the trust containing the Collateral. This reading is bolstered by Section 8.02 of the Trust Indenture Agreement, which is entitled “Application of Deposited Money.” Echoing the language of Section 15.04, this section stated, in pertinent part: 29 Section 1.01 defines a “Paying Agent”...
...regarding the Debtor’s insolvency. The amount needed to satisfy the debt had been provided; that, in turn, extinguished the need to foreclose on the liens to exact payment. Consequently, an Indenture Trustee was no longer necessary. Reading Sections 4.03, 8.02 and 15.04 together, we must conclude that the Debtor intended the Prepayment Funds to be held in a common law trust....
...BONY was not the Indenture Trustee. Accordingly, the protections afforded to the Indenture Trustee by Section 10.06 did not apply to BONY. Second, the funds to which Section 10.06 referred cannot be the Prepayment Funds. As already discussed, Sections 8.02 and 15.04 of the Trust Indenture Agreement specifically required that the Prepayment Funds be placed in a separate trust. Section 10.06, on the other hand, provided that the funds held by the Trustee need not be held in a separate trust. If Section 10.06 applied to the Prepayment Funds, it would obviously conflict with the clear directive expressed in Sections 8.02 and 15.04....
Copy

Phantom of Clearwater v. Pinellas Cnty., 894 So. 2d 1011 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005).

Cited 22 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 184, 30 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 205

responsible for the violations of minors. (Ord. No. 86-9, § 8, 2-11-86) Section 3. Section 62-84 of the Pinellas
Copy

Anthony v. Gary J. Rotella & Assocs., 906 So. 2d 1205 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005).

Cited 20 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2005 WL 1682740

waived in three ways. Trawick, Fla. Prac. & Proc. § 8-2 (2005 ed.). First, the defending party can voluntarily
Copy

Wyche v. State, 987 So. 2d 23 (Fla. 2008).

Cited 18 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 2008 WL 2678058

asked under the Schneckloth formulation." Lafave, § 8.2(n). As the Court noted in Schneckloth: there is
Copy

Pamela Caver v. Cent. Alabama Elec. Coop., 845 F.3d 1135 (11th Cir. 2017).

Cited 16 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2017 WL 117124, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 549

“patronage capital.” Loan Agreement § 6.8; CAEC Bylaws § 8.02; Ala. Code § 37-6-20. Defendant CAEC must account
Copy

Floyd v. E. Airlines, Inc., 872 F.2d 1462 (11th Cir. 1989).

Cited 14 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1989 WL 44826

Moquet Borde & Associes, 1 Doing Business in France § 8.02[2][b] at 8-6 (1988) (physical injuries are those
Copy

McDonnell v. State, 981 So. 2d 585 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008).

Cited 12 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2008 WL 2026281

and Seizure: A Treatise on the Fourth Amendment § 8.2(b) (4th ed. 2004) ("The presence of a number of
Copy

Jupiter Wreck, Inc. v. the Unidentified, Wrecked & Abandoned Sailing Vessel, 691 F. Supp. 1377 (S.D. Fla. 1988).

Cited 12 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 1988 A.M.C. 2705, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7271, 1988 WL 73386

Black, supra § 8-2, at 535-36 & n. 11. Also, an owner may refuse salvage services, id., § 8-2, at 536 &
Copy

City of Coral Gables v. Puiggros, 376 So. 2d 281 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979).

Cited 10 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 16025

...ggros, who was the plaintiff below, the right to erect a separate residential structure on a specific lot — Lot 27, Block 17 — on Alhambra Circle in the city. The dispute between the parties centers upon the application to the Puiggros property of § 8.02 of the city zoning code, which this court considered in King v....
...t 27. After this had been accomplished without a permit and without the knowledge of the city's zoning officials, Puiggros asked John Little, the zoning administrator of Coral Gables, whether Lot 27 would be considered a separate building site under § 8.02....
...Talcott, 191 So.2d 40 (Fla. 1966). [2] There is also a threshold unresolved question as to whether the prior structure was in fact a part of a building "constructed on a building site containing two or more platted fifty (50) foot lots," which, under § 8.02, prevented a later reduction of that "building site." [3] Puiggros has raised these questions through the medium of a "cross-appeal" of the judgment below....
Copy

BS v. State, 548 So. 2d 838 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989).

Cited 9 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 1989 WL 104035

(sixteen-year-old); 2 W. LaFave, Search & Seizure § 8.2(e). See generally Note, Preadjudicatory Confessions
Copy

3V Capital Master Fund Ltd. v. Off. Comm. of Unsecured Creditors of Tousa, Inc. (In Re Tousa, Inc.), 444 B.R. 613 (S.D. Fla. 2011).

Cited 9 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14019, 2011 WL 522008

stayed or bonded pending appeal. . . . . . . . Section 8.2 Remedies During the continuance of any Event
Copy

Celotex Corp. v. AIU Ins. Co. (In Re Celotex Corp.), 196 B.R. 973 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1996).

Cited 8 times | Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | 9 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 417, 1996 Bankr. LEXIS 683

...onditions, which results in . . . property damage neither expected nor intended from the standpoint of the insured." Id. [222] Id., 180 Ill.Dec. at 707, 607 N.E.2d at 1220. [223] Abraham, supra note 181, at 141; Ostrager & Newman, supra note 185, at section 8.02[c]....
...Subsequently, in the 1986 revision of the standard-form CGL policy, the expected or intended language was deleted from the occurrence definition and added as an exclusion. Id. [225] Outboard Marine, 180 Ill.Dec. at 696, 607 N.E.2d at 1209; Ostrager & Newman, supra note 185, at section 8.02[c]. [226] Ostrager & Newman, supra note 185, at section 8.02[c]....
Copy

Maleh v. Florida East Coast Props., Inc., 491 So. 2d 290 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986).

Cited 8 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

and Materials 55 (1981); J. Jeans, Trial Advocacy § 8.2 (1975). Turning to the instant case, it is clear
Copy

Mukamal v. Bakes, 383 B.R. 798 (S.D. Fla. 2007).

Cited 7 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96347, 2007 WL 4916729

voting in favor of the Plan. As set forth in Section 8.2 of the Plan: "Any Creditor entitled to vote under
Copy

Davis v. MacEdonia Hous. Auth., 641 So. 2d 131 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994).

Cited 7 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1994 WL 284111

..."Refund actions are not subject to the 60-day filing period prescribed for deficiency actions. Refund actions may be filed within four years of January 1 of the tax year for which the taxes were paid." Barr, "The Overassessment Action: Its Nature and Historical Development," in Fla. State and Local Taxes, Vol. II, § 8.02[4], at 355 (The Florida Bar 1988)....
...Heller & Co. Southeast, Inc. v. Williams, 450 So.2d 521, 530 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984), pet. for review denied, 462 So.2d 1108 (Fla. 1985)." Barr, "The Overassessment Action: Its Nature and Historical Development," in Fla. State and Local Taxes, Vol. II, § 8.02[4], at 354a n....
Copy

Izaak Walton League of Am. v. MONROE CTY., 448 So. 2d 1170 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984).

Cited 7 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12751

chapter. [7] Chapter 61-2503, Laws of Florida § 8(2) (1961): The Zoning Board shall have the authority
Copy

Royal Palm Corp. Ctr. Ass'n v. PNC Bank, NA, 89 So. 3d 923 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012).

Cited 6 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 4471, 2012 WL 933060

see Restatement (Third) of Property (Mortgages) § 8.2 cmt. b (1997), neither its language nor its history
Copy

Tamiami Partners, Ltd. v. Miccosukee Tribe of Indians, 803 F. Supp. 401 (S.D. Fla. 1992).

Cited 6 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13522, 1992 WL 213878

the discrepancy. [8] Ordinance No. 89-09-91, Section 8.2.2(b). [9] Prior to Tamiami Partners' filing
Copy

World Capita Commc'ns, Inc. v. Island Capital Mgmt., LLC (In Re Skyway Commc'ns Holding Corp.), 389 B.R. 801 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2008).

Cited 6 times | Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | 21 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 394, 2008 Bankr. LEXIS 1889, 2008 WL 2553308

separate, non-public corporate entity." (Plan, § 8.2). The Plan further provided for the "Reorganized
Copy

Nelson v. Mustian, 502 F. Supp. 698 (N.D. Fla. 1980).

Cited 5 times | Published | District Court, N.D. Florida | 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16344

number four as "termination for cause." Again in Section 8.2 of the Handbook, dismissal is discussed in terms
Copy

State v. McCord, 833 So. 2d 828 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2002 WL 31757604

confession cases." WAYNE R. LAFAVE, SEARCH AND SEIZURE § 8.2 (3d ed.1996). In coerced confession cases, police
Copy

Miami-Dade Police Dep't v. Martinez, 838 So. 2d 672 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2003 WL 729003

and Seizure: A Treatise on the Fourth Amendment § 8.2(n), at 710 (3d ed.1996), this rule, adopted by the
Copy

Alexander v. Minton, 855 So. 2d 94 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2003 WL 21360273

and the assets of the LLC equitably divided. Section 8.2 of the agreement provides that each party has
Copy

Wallace v. Town of Palm Beach, 624 F. Supp. 864 (S.D. Fla. 1985).

Cited 3 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23855

Constitution: 1) the commerce clause (Article 1, § 8), 2) the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth
Copy

Colony Beach & Tennis Club Ass'n v. Colony Lender, LLC (In re Colony Beach & Tennis Club, Inc.), 508 B.R. 468 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2014).

Cited 2 times | Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida

are needed to approve special assessments. . Section 8.2 (emphasis added). . Subparagraph l(o). "Party”
Copy

U.S. Philips Corp. v. Windmere Corp., 680 F. Supp. 361 (S.D. Fla. 1987).

Cited 2 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13991, 1987 WL 42992

...The less stringent standard of general intent is met where a business which possesses monopoly power "undertakes a course of action the consequences of which would be to destroy or exclude competition, or if monopoly results as the inevitable consequence of its conduct." 3 Von Kalinowski, Antitrust Laws & Trade Regulation § 8.02[4] (1986)....
Copy

Aluia v. Dyck-O'Neal, Inc., 205 So. 3d 768 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 10881

Restatement (Third) of Property (Mortgages) § 8.2 cmt. b (1997), neither its language nor its history
Copy

United States v. Edward Allen Schuster, 717 F.2d 537 (11th Cir. 1984).

Cited 2 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

and Seizure: A Treatise on the Fourth Amendment, § 8.2 at 680-81 (1978) and authorities cited therein.
Copy

Seamon v. Vaughan, 921 F.2d 1217 (11th Cir. 1991).

Cited 2 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1991 WL 285

construction, and administration. Administrator Agreement § 8.2, Rl-1 Exhibit B at 4. Section 682.11 of the Florida
Copy

Samples v. Conoco, Inc., 165 F. Supp. 2d 1303 (N.D. Fla. 2001).

Cited 2 times | Published | District Court, N.D. Florida | 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12872, 2001 WL 957763

16 (1957) (emphasis added), quoted in 10 C.F.R. § 8.2, at 202 (2001). And finally, Dan Berkovitz, an attorney
Copy

St. Johns Cnty. v. Smith, 766 So. 2d 1097 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2000 WL 1133079

were seeking a major modification to the PUD. Section 8-2-4(B) of the St. Johns Zoning Code provides:
Copy

Englander v. State, 246 So. 2d 746 (Fla. 1971).

Cited 2 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida

...to sign it? "A. No." The trial court, on motion to dismiss the information for bribery against Englander, held that the waiver of immunity signed by Englander was invalid because not freely and voluntarily made due to the office-forfeiture provision § 8.02 of the Charter of Metropolitan Dade County, which provided as follows: "Any county or municipal officeholder or employee who, upon being called before a grand jury to testify concerning the conduct of his office or the performance of his offi...
...immunity for self-incrimination and that provision was repealed July 23, 1969. [8] Section 2-51 of the Code, like Section 2-55, supra, were not applicable to petitioner in any event, although there was confusion about this in the proceedings below. Section 8.02 of the Charter was repealed by vote of the people on November 5, 1969....
...prosecution as well as removal from office. His mistaken belief, shared by the State and courts below, that he was subject to a criminal penalty, does not constitute a basis for invalidating his waiver of immunity. The question presented is whether § 8.02 of the Charter, providing for removal from office of county and municipal officials who refuse to waiver immunity and testify before grand juries, renders petitioner's waiver of immunity involuntary....
Copy

Julian Depot Miami, LLC v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., 364 F. Supp. 3d 1354 (S.D. Fla. 2018).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida

or damaged, subject, however, to the terms of Section 8.2. above. This Lease shall continue in full force
Copy

State v. Buchanan, 207 So. 2d 711 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1968).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

...rand jury, actually testified voluntarily. In his order of 24 February 1967, which is the order here appealed, the trial judge found: "The State claims BUCHANAN waived immunity; BUCHANAN claims the waiver was involuntary in view of the provisions of Section 8.02 of the Charter of Metropolitan Dade County, [2] and the provisions of Section 2-51 [3] and Section 2-55 [4] of the Code of Metropolitan Dade County, Florida....
Copy

Holladay v. City of Coral Gables, 382 So. 2d 92 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

...residences on each of the two lots on said building site. Mr. Little replied by letter dated April 19, 1977, that under the Zoning Code it would be permissible to do so. At that time, by virtue of Ordinance No. 2058 passed in 1973, the Zoning Code (Section 8.02) had provided that a building site consisting of two or more platted fifty-foot lots upon which a single family residence had been constructed should not be diminished, and if the existing residence was demolished or removed no permit should be issued for construction of more than one residence building on the building site. The wording of Ordinance No. 2058, in pertinent part, was as follows: SECTION 8.02 BUILDING SITES — `R', `D' AND `A' USES....
...riod for such review. See Carlson v. Town of West Miami, 118 So.2d 835 (Fla. 3d DCA 1960), and cases cited there. Thereafter, on September 27, 1977, the City Commission adopted Ordinance No. 2262 [effective thirty days thereafter]. By that ordinance Section 8.02 of the Zoning Code was amended to provide that where a single family residence or duplex was located on a building site containing one or more platted lots [with no reference to the size or frontage footage of the individual lots] such a...
...2262, to remove the ambiguity and make clear that the zoning policy expressed in the earlier ordinance was applicable to such improved multilot parcels without regard to the amount of foot frontage of the lots involved. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. NOTES [1] Ordinance No. 2262 provides the following: Section 8.02 BUILDING SITES — R D AND A USES....
Copy

Noa v. Florida Ins. Guar. Assoc., 215 So. 3d 141 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2017 WL 1076922, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 3787

§ 611.1.1 (2007); Miami-Dade County, Fla., Code § 8-2 (2001). The contractor then prepared, and Mr. Noa
Copy

Vill. of North Palm Beach v. S & H Foster's, Inc., 80 So. 3d 433 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2012 WL 555486, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 2664

to dismiss the complaint, which stated that Section 8-2 prohibits the sale or service of intoxicating
Copy

MacKenzie v. Centex Homes Ex Rel. Centex Real Est. Corp., 208 So. 3d 790 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 18789

once they have been established. 4 Section 8.2 of the declaration likewise requires the board
Copy

Mazon v. Tardif, 387 B.R. 641 (M.D. Fla. 2008).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 34618, 2008 WL 1897596

from it except by separate assignment. (Id. at § 8.2.) The exclusive right to use a cabana, however,
Copy

Smith v. State, 438 So. 2d 78 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24296

2d DCA 1974); 2 W. LaFave, Search and Seizure § 8.2 at 648-49 (1978). Compare Powell v. State, 332 So
Copy

Rich Capitol, LLC v. Wachovia Bank, N.A. (In Re Rich Capitol, LLC), 436 B.R. 224 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 2010).

Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida.

Note includes a typical acceleration clause. Section 8.2 of the Loan Agreement authorizes Wachovia to
Copy

B.S. v. State, 548 So. 2d 838 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2143, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5049

(sixteen-year-old); 2 W. LaFave, Search & Seizure § 8.2(e). See generally Note, Preadjudicatory Confessions
Copy

State v. Diaz, 549 So. 2d 759 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2313, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5359, 1989 WL 114465

Ed.2d 854; see 3 W. LaFave, Search and Seizure, § 8.2(0 (2d ed. 1987). Likewise, the police officers need
Copy

King v. City of Coral Gables, 363 So. 2d 389 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16794

and Zoning Department that the provisions of Section 8.02 of the Coral Gables Zoning Code, as amended
Copy

State of Georgia v. Jeffrey Clark (11th Cir. 2024).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

20706. U.S. Dep’t of Just., Just. Manual § 8-2.270 (2022). The Voting Sec- tion investigates
Copy

Mukamal v. D.R. Horton, Inc. (In re Majorca Isles Master Ass'n), 560 B.R. 824 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 2016).

Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | 26 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 179, 2016 Bankr. LEXIS 3797

Member, and the balance due” as required by. Section 8.02.03 of the Master Bylaws; and e. Did not include
Copy

Fhr Tb, LLC v. Tb Isle Resort, Lp., 865 F. Supp. 2d 1172 (S.D. Fla. 2011).

Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2011 WL 4914715, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 155752

Fairmont used to perform the HMA. See e.g., HMA § 8.2. Fairmont’s View: The HMA Contains Interests
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1989).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

Section 7(8), Ch. 63-1247, Laws of Florida. 12 Section 8(2), Ch. 63-1247, Laws of Florida, appropriates
Copy

Florida Digestive Health Specialists, LLP v. Ramon E. Colina, M.D., 192 So. 3d 491 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 16611, 2015 WL 6874913

(except as otherwise specifically provided in Section 8.2), Physician will not without the approval of
Copy

Adams v. Bainbridge-Decatur Cnty. Hosp. Auth., 888 F.2d 1356 (11th Cir. 1989).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

opportunity to improve his performance.” Id. at ch. VIII, § 8.2. The listed acts or conditions giving cause for
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1998).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

There is no such restriction contemplated in section 8(2), Chapter 96-519, Laws of Florida, and neither
Copy

Wills v. United States, 111 F. Supp. 3d 1277 (M.D. Fla. 2015).

Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68998, 2015 WL 3440422

or practicable in a national park setting. Id., § 8.2.5.1. Additional regulations give Park Service management
Copy

World Capita Commc'ns, Inc. v. Island Capital Mgmt., LLC (In Re Skyway Commc'ns Holding Corp.), 415 B.R. 859 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2009).

Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | 22 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 59, 2009 Bankr. LEXIS 2924, 2009 WL 3018090

Debtor." (Main Case Doc. 420, § 8.1). Finally, § 8.2 of the Plan, entitled "Continued Corporate Existence
Copy

Amsurg New Port Richey FL, Inc. v. Vangara, 159 So. 3d 260 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 2959, 2015 WL 894322

The parties acknowledge and agree that this Section 8.2 does not require physician owners to perform
Copy

Bosch v. State, 560 So. 2d 256 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1797, 1990 WL 29501

1988). See generally 3 W. LaFave, Search & Seizure § 8.2(c), at 188-89 (2d ed. 1987). Affirmed.
Copy

Anthony Busto v. Natalia Arias (Fla. 3d DCA 2025).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

Danniel Baer et al., Business Valuation and Damages § 8.2.4, in Massachusetts Expert Witnesses, ch. 8 (4th
Copy

Fernando Fernandez v. Consol. Box Co., 249 So. 2d 434 (Fla. 1971).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1971 Fla. LEXIS 3612

generally, Alpert Florida Workmen’s Compensation Law, § 8:2; I Larson Workmen’s Compensation Law, § IS. The
Copy

Wanda Crowder v. The Delta Air Line, Inc. Fam.-Care Sav. Plan (11th Cir. 2020).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

whom such benefits shall be paid. Under Section 8.02(a) of the Plan, distribution of the vested value
Copy

Wanda Crowder v. The Delta Air Line, Inc. Fam.-Care Sav. Plan (11th Cir. 2020).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

whom such benefits shall be paid. Under Section 8.02(a) of the Plan, distribution of the vested value
Copy

State v. Levine, 237 So. 2d 193 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1970).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6112

Metropolitan Dade County, which provides: "Section 8.02 Waiver of Immunity Any county or municipal
Copy

Florida Digestive Health Specialists, LLP v. Ramon E. Colina, M.D., 170 So. 3d 946 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 11556, 2015 WL 4605677

(except as otherwise specifically provided in Section 8.2), Physician will not without the approval of
Copy

United States v. Smiti Liberse, 688 F.3d 1198 (11th Cir. 2012).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 23 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 1343

132 S.Ct. at 2329 (quoting Fair Sentencing Act § 8(2), 124 Stat. at 2374). The Sentencing Commission
Copy

United States v. Smiti Liberse (11th Cir. 2012).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

132 S.Ct. at 2329 (quoting Fair Sentencing Act § 8(2), 124 Stat. at 2374). The Sentencing Commission
Copy

State v. Delgado, 92 So. 3d 314 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2012 WL 3023164, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 11959

invalid); Wayne R. LaFave, 4 Search and Seizure § 8.2(j), at 119 (4th ed. 2004) (“[I]t is at best open
Copy

Amendments To Florida Rules of Crim. Procedure 3.851, 3.852, & 3.993, 797 So. 2d 1213 (Fla. 2001).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 494, 2001 Fla. LEXIS 1408, 2001 WL 776678

all the requirements that were contained in section 8(2) of the DPRA10 and the Morris Committee’s proposal
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 2007).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

Fla. Const.), 02-44 (2002) and 03-20 (2003). 9 Section 8.02(C) of the Charter. 10 8.03(A) of the Charter
Copy

Morris v. Osteen, 948 So. 2d 821 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 500, 2007 WL 120043

title. Thomas E. Baynes, Jr., Florida Mortgages § 8-2 (1999). Preserving the lien would preserve the mortgagee’s
Copy

Louis Matthew Clements v. State of Florida (11th Cir. 2023).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

man, Federal Habeas Corpus and Procedure § 8.2[a], at 461 (7th ed. 2021) (explaining that
Copy

Aldridge v. Lily-tulip, Inc. Salary Ret. Plan Benefits Comm., 953 F.2d 587 (11th Cir. 1992).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1992 WL 10832

411(d)(3) (emphasis added).” PBGC Brief at 13-14. Section 8.2 of the Plan, consistent with section 411(d)(3)
Copy

In Re: Stand. Jury Instructions in Crim. Cases - Report 2018-06 (Fla. 2018).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida

need not be shown. In the course ofthe taking. § 8]2.]3(3)(b), Fla. Stat. “In the course of the taking”
Copy

Byrd, The Florida Senate v. Black Voters Matter Capacity Bldg. Inst., Inc., Equal Ground Educ. Fund, Inc. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2023).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

district. See ch. 2022-265, Fla. Laws (2022); § 8.0002, Fla. Stat. (2022).
Copy

Underwriters of Lloyd's v. Carol Osting-Schwinn (11th Cir. 2010).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

through underwriting agents. Lloyd’s Act, 1982, c. 14 § 8(2). Lead underwriters, or active underwriters
Copy

City of Coral Gables v. Hunter, 213 So. 2d 467 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1968).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5140

sustained because of the specific language contained in § 8.02 of the City of Coral Gables Zoning Code which reads
Copy

City of Coral Gables v. Puiggros, 418 So. 2d 367 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20931

more platted fifty (50) foot lots,” which, under § 8.02 of the city zoning code, prevented a later reduction
Copy

Zalarick v. Monroe Cnty., 467 So. 2d 1088 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1086

ed. 1985); 2 E. Yokley, Zoning Law and Practice § 8-2 (4th ed. 1978). In this instance, the "accessory"

This Florida statute resource is curated by Graham W. Syfert, Esq., a Jacksonville, Florida personal injury and workers' compensation attorney. For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.