CopyCited 214 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 16746, 2010 WL 3056606
through underwriting agents. Lloyd's Act, 1982, c. 14 § 8(2). Lead underwriters, or active underwriters, serve
CopyCited 200 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 125, 1996 WL 193
— A Treatise on the Fourth Amendment § 8.2(a) at 180 (1987) (when the police state that they
CopyCited 110 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2007 WL 2846403
others. See 4 Wayne R. LaFave, Search and Seizure § 8.2(d) (4th ed.2004) (discussing additional factors
CopyCited 85 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 43 Fed. R. Serv. 211, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 29772, 1995 WL 584712
and Seizure-A Treatise of the Fourth Amendment § 8.2(a) at 180 (2d ed. 1987) (hereinafter “LaFave”).
CopyCited 78 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 18 Fed. R. Serv. 458, 2 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 614, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 30632
...lers of the particular product or service operate.” (emphasis in original) Proof of the relevant product and geographic market is absolutely essential to appellants’ Section 2 claims. See, 3 Von Kalinowski, Antitrust Laws and Trade Regulation, §§
8.02[1], 9.01[1] (1983); In re Municipal Bond Reporting Antitrust Litigation,
672 F.2d at 441....
...at 1593 , 3 Von Kalinowski, Antitrust Laws and Trade Regulation, § 9.02[2]-[3] (1983); specific intent to monopolize is a necessary element of a Section 2 offense of actual monopolization, Id. at § 9.01(1). Monopoly power is a critical element of a Section 2 offense of actual monopolization, Id. at § 8.02(1)....
...at 1593 ; In re Municipal Bond Reporting Antitrust Litigation,
672 F.2d 436 (5th Cir.1982); Joe Regueira, Inc. v. American Distilling Co., Inc.,
642 F.2d 826, 832 (5th Cir. Unit B, 1981). 7 Von Kalinowski, Antitrust Laws and Trade Regulation, §§ 5
8.02(1), 9.01(1) (1983); Sausalito Pharmacy, Inc....
CopyCited 55 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 2061, 2009 WL 225254
of fraud.” 1 Joel Androphy, White Collar Crime § 8:2.70 (2d ed.2006). In the years since we decided Brown
CopyCited 38 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
(emphasis added)." PBGC Brief at 13-14. Section 8.2 of the Plan, consistent with section 411(d)(3)
CopyCited 37 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1993 WL 184571
and Seizure: A Treatise on the Fourth Amendment § 8.2 n. 7 (2d ed. 1987). The United States Supreme Court
CopyCited 33 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 17990, 46 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 224
...was an Indenture Trustee, we
address the question of what obligations, if any, BONY had to the Debtor. The
Debtor asserts that the role of Indenture Trustee terminated when it transferred the
Prepayment Funds to NationsBank, and that pursuant to Section 8.02 of the Trust
Indenture Agreement, NationsBank held those funds in a common law trust....
...they “shall not be deemed to be part of the Collateral or Trust Moneys.” The trust
into which the Prepayment Funds had to be placed, therefore, was separate and
distinct from the trust containing the Collateral.
This reading is bolstered by Section
8.02 of the Trust Indenture Agreement,
which is entitled “Application of Deposited Money.” Echoing the language of
Section 15.04, this section stated, in pertinent part:
29
Section
1.01 defines a “Paying Agent”...
...regarding the Debtor’s insolvency. The amount needed to satisfy the debt had
been provided; that, in turn, extinguished the need to foreclose on the liens to
exact payment. Consequently, an Indenture Trustee was no longer necessary.
Reading Sections 4.03, 8.02 and 15.04 together, we must conclude that the
Debtor intended the Prepayment Funds to be held in a common law trust....
...BONY was not the Indenture Trustee. Accordingly, the protections afforded to
the Indenture Trustee by Section 10.06 did not apply to BONY.
Second, the funds to which Section 10.06 referred cannot be the Prepayment
Funds. As already discussed, Sections 8.02 and 15.04 of the Trust Indenture
Agreement specifically required that the Prepayment Funds be placed in a separate
trust. Section 10.06, on the other hand, provided that the funds held by the Trustee
need not be held in a separate trust. If Section 10.06 applied to the Prepayment
Funds, it would obviously conflict with the clear directive expressed in Sections
8.02 and 15.04....
CopyCited 22 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 184, 30 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 205
responsible for the violations of minors. (Ord. No. 86-9, § 8, 2-11-86) Section 3. Section 62-84 of the Pinellas
CopyCited 20 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2005 WL 1682740
waived in three ways. Trawick, Fla. Prac. & Proc. § 8-2 (2005 ed.). First, the defending party can voluntarily
CopyCited 18 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 2008 WL 2678058
asked under the Schneckloth formulation." Lafave, § 8.2(n). As the Court noted in Schneckloth: there is
CopyCited 14 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1989 WL 44826
Moquet Borde & Associes, 1 Doing Business in France §
8.02[2][b] at 8-6 (1988) (physical injuries are those
CopyCited 12 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2008 WL 2026281
and Seizure: A Treatise on the Fourth Amendment § 8.2(b) (4th ed. 2004) ("The presence of a number of
CopyCited 12 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 1988 A.M.C. 2705, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7271, 1988 WL 73386
Black, supra § 8-2, at 535-36 & n. 11. Also, an owner may refuse salvage services, id., § 8-2, at 536 &
CopyCited 10 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 16025
...ggros, who was the plaintiff below, the right to erect a separate residential structure on a specific lot Lot 27, Block 17 on Alhambra Circle in the city. The dispute between the parties centers upon the application to the Puiggros property of § 8.02 of the city zoning code, which this court considered in King v....
...t 27. After this had been accomplished without a permit and without the knowledge of the city's zoning officials, Puiggros asked John Little, the zoning administrator of Coral Gables, whether Lot 27 would be considered a separate building site under § 8.02....
...Talcott,
191 So.2d 40 (Fla. 1966). [2] There is also a threshold unresolved question as to whether the prior structure was in fact a part of a building "constructed on a building site containing two or more platted fifty (50) foot lots," which, under §
8.02, prevented a later reduction of that "building site." [3] Puiggros has raised these questions through the medium of a "cross-appeal" of the judgment below....
CopyCited 9 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 1989 WL 104035
(sixteen-year-old); 2 W. LaFave, Search & Seizure § 8.2(e). See generally Note, Preadjudicatory Confessions
CopyCited 8 times | Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | 9 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 417, 1996 Bankr. LEXIS 683
...onditions, which results in . . . property damage neither expected nor intended from the standpoint of the insured." Id. [222] Id., 180 Ill.Dec. at 707, 607 N.E.2d at 1220. [223] Abraham, supra note 181, at 141; Ostrager & Newman, supra note 185, at section 8.02[c]....
...Subsequently, in the 1986 revision of the standard-form CGL policy, the expected or intended language was deleted from the occurrence definition and added as an exclusion. Id. [225] Outboard Marine, 180 Ill.Dec. at 696, 607 N.E.2d at 1209; Ostrager & Newman, supra note 185, at section 8.02[c]. [226] Ostrager & Newman, supra note 185, at section 8.02[c]....
CopyCited 8 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal
and Materials 55 (1981); J. Jeans, Trial Advocacy § 8.2 (1975). Turning to the instant case, it is clear
CopyCited 7 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1994 WL 284111
..."Refund actions are not subject to the 60-day filing period prescribed for deficiency actions. Refund actions may be filed within four years of January 1 of the tax year for which the taxes were paid." Barr, "The Overassessment Action: Its Nature and Historical Development," in Fla. State and Local Taxes, Vol. II, § 8.02[4], at 355 (The Florida Bar 1988)....
...Heller & Co. Southeast, Inc. v. Williams,
450 So.2d 521, 530 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984), pet. for review denied,
462 So.2d 1108 (Fla. 1985)." Barr, "The Overassessment Action: Its Nature and Historical Development," in Fla. State and Local Taxes, Vol. II, §
8.02[4], at 354a n....
CopyCited 7 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12751
chapter. [7] Chapter 61-2503, Laws of Florida § 8(2) (1961): The Zoning Board shall have the authority
CopyCited 6 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 4471, 2012 WL 933060
see Restatement (Third) of Property (Mortgages) § 8.2 cmt. b (1997), neither its language nor its history
CopyCited 6 times | Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | 21 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 394, 2008 Bankr. LEXIS 1889, 2008 WL 2553308
separate, non-public corporate entity." (Plan, § 8.2). The Plan further provided for the "Reorganized
CopyCited 5 times | Published | District Court, N.D. Florida | 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16344
number four as "termination for cause." Again in Section 8.2 of the Handbook, dismissal is discussed in terms
CopyCited 5 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2002 WL 31757604
confession cases." WAYNE R. LAFAVE, SEARCH AND SEIZURE § 8.2 (3d ed.1996). In coerced confession cases, police
CopyCited 4 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2003 WL 729003
and Seizure: A Treatise on the Fourth Amendment § 8.2(n), at 710 (3d ed.1996), this rule, adopted by the
CopyCited 4 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2003 WL 21360273
and the assets of the LLC equitably divided. Section 8.2 of the agreement provides that each party has
CopyCited 3 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23855
Constitution: 1) the commerce clause (Article 1, § 8), 2) the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth
CopyCited 2 times | Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida
are needed to approve special assessments. . Section 8.2 (emphasis added). . Subparagraph l(o). "Party”
CopyCited 2 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13991, 1987 WL 42992
...The less stringent standard of general intent is met where a business which possesses monopoly power "undertakes a course of action the consequences of which would be to destroy or exclude competition, or if monopoly results as the inevitable consequence of its conduct." 3 Von Kalinowski, Antitrust Laws & Trade Regulation § 8.02[4] (1986)....
CopyCited 2 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 10881
Restatement (Third) of Property (Mortgages) § 8.2 cmt. b (1997), neither its language nor its history
CopyCited 2 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
and Seizure: A Treatise on the Fourth Amendment, § 8.2 at 680-81 (1978) and authorities cited therein.
CopyCited 2 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1991 WL 285
construction, and administration. Administrator Agreement § 8.2, Rl-1 Exhibit B at 4. Section
682.11 of the Florida
CopyCited 2 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2000 WL 1133079
were seeking a major modification to the PUD. Section 8-2-4(B) of the St. Johns Zoning Code provides:
CopyCited 2 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida
...to sign it? "A. No." The trial court, on motion to dismiss the information for bribery against Englander, held that the waiver of immunity signed by Englander was invalid because not freely and voluntarily made due to the office-forfeiture provision § 8.02 of the Charter of Metropolitan Dade County, which provided as follows: "Any county or municipal officeholder or employee who, upon being called before a grand jury to testify concerning the conduct of his office or the performance of his offi...
...immunity for self-incrimination and that provision was repealed July 23, 1969. [8] Section 2-51 of the Code, like Section 2-55, supra, were not applicable to petitioner in any event, although there was confusion about this in the proceedings below. Section 8.02 of the Charter was repealed by vote of the people on November 5, 1969....
...prosecution as well as removal from office. His mistaken belief, shared by the State and courts below, that he was subject to a criminal penalty, does not constitute a basis for invalidating his waiver of immunity. The question presented is whether § 8.02 of the Charter, providing for removal from office of county and municipal officials who refuse to waiver immunity and testify before grand juries, renders petitioner's waiver of immunity involuntary....
CopyCited 1 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida
or damaged, subject, however, to the terms of Section 8.2. above. This Lease shall continue in full force
CopyCited 1 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida
...rand jury, actually testified voluntarily. In his order of 24 February 1967, which is the order here appealed, the trial judge found: "The State claims BUCHANAN waived immunity; BUCHANAN claims the waiver was involuntary in view of the provisions of Section 8.02 of the Charter of Metropolitan Dade County, [2] and the provisions of Section 2-51 [3] and Section 2-55 [4] of the Code of Metropolitan Dade County, Florida....
CopyCited 1 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal
...residences on each of the two lots on said building site. Mr. Little replied by letter dated April 19, 1977, that under the Zoning Code it would be permissible to do so. At that time, by virtue of Ordinance No. 2058 passed in 1973, the Zoning Code (Section 8.02) had provided that a building site consisting of two or more platted fifty-foot lots upon which a single family residence had been constructed should not be diminished, and if the existing residence was demolished or removed no permit should be issued for construction of more than one residence building on the building site. The wording of Ordinance No. 2058, in pertinent part, was as follows: SECTION 8.02 BUILDING SITES `R', `D' AND `A' USES....
...riod for such review. See Carlson v. Town of West Miami,
118 So.2d 835 (Fla. 3d DCA 1960), and cases cited there. Thereafter, on September 27, 1977, the City Commission adopted Ordinance No. 2262 [effective thirty days thereafter]. By that ordinance Section
8.02 of the Zoning Code was amended to provide that where a single family residence or duplex was located on a building site containing one or more platted lots [with no reference to the size or frontage footage of the individual lots] such a...
...2262, to remove the ambiguity and make clear that the zoning policy expressed in the earlier ordinance was applicable to such improved multilot parcels without regard to the amount of foot frontage of the lots involved. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. NOTES [1] Ordinance No. 2262 provides the following: Section 8.02 BUILDING SITES R D AND A USES....
CopyCited 1 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 18789
once they have been established. 4 Section 8.2 of the declaration likewise requires the board
CopyPublished | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24296
2d DCA 1974); 2 W. LaFave, Search and Seizure § 8.2 at 648-49 (1978). Compare Powell v. State, 332 So
CopyPublished | United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida.
Note includes a typical acceleration clause. Section 8.2 of the Loan Agreement authorizes Wachovia to
CopyPublished | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2143, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5049
(sixteen-year-old); 2 W. LaFave, Search & Seizure § 8.2(e). See generally Note, Preadjudicatory Confessions
CopyPublished | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2313, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5359, 1989 WL 114465
Ed.2d 854; see 3 W. LaFave, Search and Seizure, § 8.2(0 (2d ed. 1987). Likewise, the police officers need
CopyPublished | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16794
and Zoning Department that the provisions of Section
8.02 of the Coral Gables Zoning Code, as amended
CopyPublished | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
20706. U.S. Dep’t of Just., Just. Manual § 8-2.270 (2022). The Voting Sec- tion investigates
CopyPublished | United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | 26 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 179, 2016 Bankr. LEXIS 3797
Member, and the balance due” as required by. Section
8.02.03 of the Master Bylaws; and e. Did not include
CopyAgo (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1989).
Published | Florida Attorney General Reports
Section 7(8), Ch. 63-1247, Laws of Florida. 12 Section 8(2), Ch. 63-1247, Laws of Florida, appropriates
CopyPublished | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
opportunity to improve his performance.” Id. at ch. VIII, § 8.2. The listed acts or conditions giving cause for
CopyAgo (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1998).
Published | Florida Attorney General Reports
There is no such restriction contemplated in section 8(2), Chapter 96-519, Laws of Florida, and neither
CopyPublished | United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | 22 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 59, 2009 Bankr. LEXIS 2924, 2009 WL 3018090
Debtor." (Main Case Doc. 420, § 8.1). Finally, § 8.2 of the Plan, entitled "Continued Corporate Existence
CopyPublished | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal
Danniel Baer et al., Business Valuation and Damages § 8.2.4, in Massachusetts Expert Witnesses, ch. 8 (4th
CopyPublished | Supreme Court of Florida | 1971 Fla. LEXIS 3612
generally, Alpert Florida Workmen’s Compensation Law, § 8:2; I Larson Workmen’s Compensation Law, § IS. The
CopyPublished | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
whom such benefits shall be paid. Under Section
8.02(a) of the Plan, distribution of the vested value
CopyPublished | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
whom such benefits shall be paid. Under Section
8.02(a) of the Plan, distribution of the vested value
CopyPublished | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6112
Metropolitan Dade County, which provides: "Section
8.02 Waiver of Immunity Any county or municipal
CopyPublished | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 23 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 1343
132 S.Ct. at 2329 (quoting Fair Sentencing Act § 8(2), 124 Stat. at 2374). The Sentencing Commission
CopyPublished | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
132 S.Ct. at 2329 (quoting Fair Sentencing Act § 8(2), 124 Stat. at 2374). The Sentencing Commission
CopyPublished | Supreme Court of Florida | 26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 494, 2001 Fla. LEXIS 1408, 2001 WL 776678
all the requirements that were contained in section 8(2) of the DPRA10 and the Morris Committee’s proposal
CopyAgo (Fla. Att'y Gen. 2007).
Published | Florida Attorney General Reports
Fla. Const.), 02-44 (2002) and 03-20 (2003). 9 Section
8.02(C) of the Charter. 10 8.03(A) of the Charter
CopyPublished | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
man, Federal Habeas Corpus and Procedure § 8.2[a], at 461 (7th ed. 2021) (explaining that
CopyPublished | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1992 WL 10832
411(d)(3) (emphasis added).” PBGC Brief at 13-14. Section 8.2 of the Plan, consistent with section 411(d)(3)
CopyPublished | Supreme Court of Florida
need not be shown. In the course ofthe taking. § 8]2.]3(3)(b), Fla. Stat. “In the course of the taking”
CopyPublished | District Court of Appeal of Florida
district. See ch. 2022-265, Fla. Laws (2022); §
8.0002, Fla. Stat. (2022).
CopyPublished | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal
See Philip J. Padovano, Florida Civil Practice § 8:2 (2025 ed.). “This simplified pleading procedure
CopyPublished | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
through underwriting agents. Lloyd’s Act, 1982, c. 14 § 8(2). Lead underwriters, or active underwriters
CopyPublished | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5140
sustained because of the specific language contained in §
8.02 of the City of Coral Gables Zoning Code which reads
CopyPublished | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20931
more platted fifty (50) foot lots,” which, under §
8.02 of the city zoning code, prevented a later reduction
CopyPublished | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1086
ed. 1985); 2 E. Yokley, Zoning Law and Practice § 8-2 (4th ed. 1978). In this instance, the "accessory"