The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title IV
EXECUTIVE BRANCH

Chapter 14
GOVERNOR

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 14.06

14.06 Governor authorized to employ clerical assistance for departments of state.—The Governor of the state may employ clerical aid to work in any department of the state under the supervision and direction of the head of such department whenever in the judgment of the Governor such additional help is necessary for the proper conduct of the business and affairs of such department, and when the same has become necessary by reason of the increase in the business of such department and was not foreseen and adequately provided for in the general appropriations bill. The Governor is further authorized to employ such persons as may be required from time to time to make such investigations as may, in the judgment of the Governor, be necessary or expedient to efficiently conduct the affairs of the state government, especially to make investigation and report of matters concerning taxation and finance throughout the state.

History.—s. 1, ch. 11369, 1925; CGL 109.

F.S. 14.06 on Google Scholar

F.S. 14.06 on Casetext

Amendments to 14.06

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 14.06

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 14.06.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

TD BANK N. A. v. W. HILL, II,, 928 F.3d 259 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . Flexible Lifeline Sys. , 654 F.3d at 1000 (quoting 4 Nimmer on Copyright § 14.06[A][5] ). . . . Cir. 2017) (Patent Act); 4 Nimmer on Copyright § 14.06[D] (2018). . . .

REYNOLDS, v. A. BERRYHILL,, 387 F. Supp. 3d 642 (D.S.C. 2019)

. . . evaluating this evidence under all potentially applicable listings, the ALJ summarily addresses Listing 14.06 . . . Listings 14.02 and 14.06 are identical except for the underlying diagnosis. . . .

SPEECH FIRST, INC. v. SCHLISSEL,, 333 F. Supp. 3d 700 (E.D. Mich. 2018)

. . . gender expression, disability, religion, height, weight, or veteran status) [201.89-1 and Regents bylaw 14.06 . . .

LEEBER REALTY LLC v. TRUSTCO BANK,, 316 F. Supp. 3d 594 (S.D.N.Y. 2018)

. . . . § 14.06.) . . . (Lease §§ 5.07(b), 13.01(a), 14.06.) . . .

HUSSEY, v. RUCKUS WIRELESS, INC., 263 F. Supp. 3d 781 (N.D. Cal. 2017)

. . . ... of $6.45 in cash and 0,75 shares of Brocade common stock "(valued at the time of the offer at $14.06 . . . agreement (March 9, 2016), the merger consideration for each Ruckus share had an implied valued of $14.06 . . .

ODONNELL, On v. HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS,, 251 F. Supp. 3d 1052 (S.D. Tex. 2017)

. . . Id. art. 14.06. . . .

ALSTOM, v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY,, 228 F. Supp. 3d 244 (S.D.N.Y. 2017)

. . . deemed cumulative with and not exclusive of any other remedy conferred hereby,” and Sections 14.02 and 14.06 . . .

ODONNELL, On v. HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS,, 227 F. Supp. 3d 706 (S.D. Tex. 2016)

. . . Id., art. 14.06. . . . Pro. art. 14.06. . The order is available at Docket Entry No. 80, Ex. 1. . . . .

BMG RIGHTS MANAGEMENT US LLC, v. COX COMMUNICATIONS, INC. LLC,, 199 F. Supp. 3d 958 (E.D. Va. 2016)

. . . s wording should plainly delineate the scope of the proscribed conduct.” 5-14 Nimmer on Copyright § 14.06 . . .

JANE DOE NO. v. BACKPAGE. COM, LLC, 817 F.3d 12 (1st Cir. 2016)

. . . Nimmer & David Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright § 14.06[B][1][a] (2015). . . .

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, COOPERATIVE BANK, v. RIPPY D. Jr. III III B. G. Jr. C. Jr. LLC, 799 F.3d 301 (4th Cir. 2015)

. . . Robinson, II, Robinson on North Carolina Corporation Law § 14.06, at 281 (5th ed.1995)) (alteration in . . . Robinson, Robinson on North Carolina Corporation Law § 14.06 n. 2. . . . ILA Corp., 513 S.E.2d at 822 (quoting Robinson, Robinson on North Carolina Corporation Law § 14.06 at . . . (quoting Robinson, Robinson on North Carolina Corporation Law § 14.06 at 281). . . .

WARAD WEST, LLC, v. SORIN CRM USA INC. USA, SRL,, 119 F. Supp. 3d 1294 (D. Colo. 2015)

. . . . § 14.06.) . . .

R. DUVALL, v. INFINITY SALES GROUP, LLC,, 608 F. App'x 897 (11th Cir. 2015)

. . . officer, Laresa McIntyre, that Duvall’s sales percentage of 7.32 percent was substantially less than the 14.06 . . .

GARCIA, v. GOOGLE, INC. a LLC, a K. J. M., 786 F.3d 733 (9th Cir. 2015)

. . . .”); 4 Nimmer on Copyright § 14.06[A][3][e] (noting unreasonable delay can defeat irreparable injury . . . (quoting 4 Nimmer on Copyright § 14.06[A][5])). . . .

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, v. WILLETTS, III,, 48 F. Supp. 3d 844 (E.D.N.C. 2014)

. . . Robinson on North Carolina Corporations, § 14.06. . . .

VIRTUAL STUDIOS, INC. v. BEAULIEU GROUP, LLC,, 987 F. Supp. 2d 769 (E.D. Tenn. 2013)

. . . Nimmer & David Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright § 14.06[B] (2007)); see also Jobete Music Co., Inc. v. . . .

ROSARIO- GONZ LEZ, v. UNITED STATES,, 544 F. App'x 5 (1st Cir. 2013)

. . . Longstreth, Handling Federal Tort Claims, § 14.06[1], at 14-128 to - 128.1 (2013) (distinguishing situations . . .

VILLAS AT PARKSIDE PARTNERS, De v. CITY OF FARMERS BRANCH, TEXAS, v., 726 F.3d 524 (5th Cir. 2013)

. . . Ann. art. 14.01(b), 14.06(a)-(b) (West 2011). II. . . . Proc. art. 14.01; 14.06; 15.17. . . . P. art. 14.01, 14.06, 15.17. . Arizona v. . . .

METROPOLITAN HOSPITAL, a v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, 712 F.3d 248 (6th Cir. 2013)

. . . As a result, Metro’s DPP for 2005 was reduced from 26.28% (as calculated by Metro) to 14.06% (as calculated . . .

DOUGLAS, v. CHARIOTS FOR HIRE,, 918 F. Supp. 2d 24 (D.D.C. 2013)

. . . Legal Standard A. 12(b)(3) and § 14.06 Dismissal for Improper Venue When a plaintiff brings suit in an . . .

A. RUSSELL, v. J. ASTRUE,, 506 F. App'x 792 (10th Cir. 2012)

. . . connective tissue disease” that met the criteria to be considered presumptively disabled under Listing § 14.06 . . . P, App. 1, 14.00(D)(5)(a) (Listing § 14.06) (“This listing includes syndromes with clinical and immunologic . . . See Listing § 14.06 and SSR 99-2p, 1999 WL 271569, at *2 (evaluation of cases involving chronic fatigue . . .

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, v. WILLETTS, III,, 882 F. Supp. 2d 859 (E.D.N.C. 2012)

. . . Robinson on North Carolina Corporations, § 14.06. . . .

RICHARDSON, v. J. ASTRUE,, 858 F. Supp. 2d 1162 (D. Colo. 2012)

. . . Listing 14.06 may be the most applicable that addresses “Undifferentiated and mixed connective tissue . . .

D. CHAMBERS, v. J. ASTRUE,, 835 F. Supp. 2d 668 (S.D. Ind. 2011)

. . . Chambers’ impairments did not meet or medically equal Listings 1.02, 1.04, 14.06 or any other impairment . . .

FLEXIBLE LIFELINE SYSTEMS, INC. v. PRECISION LIFT, INC., 654 F.3d 989 (9th Cir. 2011)

. . . Franklin Computer Corp., 714 F.2d at 1254 (citing 3 Nimmer on Copyright § 14.06[A], at 14-50, 14-51 & . . . As one commentator notes, ‘Harm must be proved, not presumed.’ ” 4 Nimmer on Copyright § 14.06[A][5], . . . Franklin Computer Corp., 714 F.2d 1240, 1254 (3d Cir.1983) (citing 3 Nimmer on Copyright § 14.06[A], . . .

WARNER BROS. ENTERTAINMENT INC. v. WTV SYSTEMS, INC., 824 F. Supp. 2d 1003 (C.D. Cal. 2011)

. . . Nimmer & David Nimmer, Nimmeron Copyright § 14.06 (2011) ("No longer applicable is the presumption of . . .

GLENN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LLC, v. BELL AEROSPACE SERVICES, INC., 785 F. Supp. 2d 1258 (M.D. Ala. 2011)

. . . . § 14.06). . . .

EJS PROPERTIES, LLC, v. CITY OF TOLEDO,, 736 F. Supp. 2d 1123 (N.D. Ohio 2010)

. . . Specifically, Articles XIV § 14.06(F) and XXVIII of the Liberty Township Zoning Resolution, Ohio Rev.Code . . .

WEDGEWOOD LIMITED PARTNERSHIP I, v. TOWNSHIP OF LIBERTY, OHIO C., 610 F.3d 340 (6th Cir. 2010)

. . . I understand the majority opinion to hold that Articles XIV § 14.06(F) and XXVII of the Liberty Township . . . Article XIV of the Liberty Township Zoning Resolution § 14.06(F) states: Any significant changes to an . . . See Liberty Township Zoning Resolution § 14.06(F). . . . Specifically, Articles XIV § 14.06(F) and XXVII of the Liberty Township Zoning Resolution, Ohio Rev.Code . . .

M. SALINGER R. J. D. v. COLTING, A. B. ABP, SCB, 607 F.3d 68 (2d Cir. 2010)

. . . Penguin Putnam, Inc., 368 F.3d 77, 84 (2d Cir.2004) (quoting 4 Nimmer on Copyright § 14.06 for the proposition . . .

METROPOLITAN HOSPITAL, INC. v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,, 702 F. Supp. 2d 808 (W.D. Mich. 2010)

. . . the Medicaid and Medicare Fractions, the intermediary lowered Metro’s DSH percentage from 26.28% to 14.06% . . .

GULF POWER COMPANY, v. COALSALES II, L. L. C. f k a, 661 F. Supp. 2d 1270 (N.D. Fla. 2009)

. . . , 5.02, 5.03, 5.08, 6.02, 6.04, 6.05, 7.01, 7.02, 8.01, 8.02, 9.01, 9.04, 9.06, 9.07, 11.01, 14.02, 14.06 . . . 2.07, 2.10, 2.12, 2.16, 2.20, 2.27, 2.28, 2.34, 5.03, 8.01, 8.02, 9.04, 9.06, 11.01, 14.02, 14.03, 14.06 . . .

ELEKTRA ENTERTAINMENT GROUP INC. v. CARTER,, 618 F. Supp. 2d 89 (D. Me. 2009)

. . . Nimmer & David Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright § 14.06[C][2][c] (2009); see also Bigwood, 441 F.Supp.2d at . . .

BMG MUSIC, v. MARSTERS,, 616 F. Supp. 2d 151 (D. Me. 2009)

. . . Nimmer & David Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright § 14.06[C][2][c] (2009); see also Bigwood, 441 F.Supp.2d at . . .

ARISTOCRAT LEISURE LIMITED, v. DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS, KBC UK KBC SPC KBC KBC SPC KBC LLC, UFJ PLC, LLC CQS D. E. LLC, D. E. QVT LP, AG,, 618 F. Supp. 2d 280 (S.D.N.Y. 2009)

. . . (See Indenture § 14.06 (“This Indenture and the Bonds shall be construed in accordance with and governed . . .

ARISTOCRAT LEISURE LIMITED, v. DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS, KBC UK KBC SPC KBC KBC SPC KBC LLC, UFJ PLC, LLC CQS D. E. LLC, D. E. QVT LP, AG,, 631 F. Supp. 2d 308 (S.D.N.Y. 2009)

. . . (See Trustee's Ex. 3, § 14.06 ("This Indenture and the Bonds shall be construed in accordance with and . . .

FLUXO- CANE OVERSEAS LTD. v. E. D. F. MAN SUGAR INC., 599 F. Supp. 2d 639 (D. Md. 2009)

. . . Ex. 1 at 14.06(c)(1); Cipriani Aff. ¶5. . . .

BAYNES v. UNITED STATES, 302 F. App'x 334 (6th Cir. 2008)

. . . Cf Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law § 14.06 (2008) (“[A] demonstration that travel time was specifically . . .

WEDGEWOOD LIMITED PARTNERSHIP I, v. TOWNSHIP OF LIBERTY, OHIO,, 578 F. Supp. 2d 941 (S.D. Ohio 2008)

. . . See Zoning Resolution §§ 14.01, 14.06(a)-(c) (eff. May 1, 1991). . . . See id. § 14.06(d) (“The Development Plan as approved by the Township Trustees shall constitute an amendment . . . respect to the major modification procedure, Defendants argue that it was incorporated in to Section 14.06 . . . See Zoning Resolution § 14.06(E) (eff. Oct. 3, 2002). . . . .

ROTHGERY v. GILLESPIE COUNTY, TEXAS, 554 U.S. 191 (U.S. 2008)

. . . Ann., Art. 14.06(a) (Vernon Supp. 2007). . . . See Art. 14.06(a) (in cases of warrantless arrest, “[t]he magistrate shall immediately perform the duties . . .

B. NEARY v. MILTRONICS MANUFACTURING SERVICES, INC., 534 F. Supp. 2d 227 (D.N.H. 2008)

. . . Ann. tit. 11A, §§ 14.06-14.09. . . .

BRIDGEPORT MUSIC, INC. v. JUSTIN COMBS PUBLISHING a UMG UMG LLC,, 507 F.3d 470 (6th Cir. 2007)

. . . Nimmer & David Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright § 14.06[B] (2007) (hereinafter Nimmer). . . . Powell, 897 F.2d 565, 567 (D.C.Cir.1990) (emphasis in original); see also Nimmer § 14.06[B] (“Generally . . .

METRO- GOLDWYN- MAYER STUDIOS, INC. v. GROKSTER, LTD. v. BV,, 518 F. Supp. 2d 1197 (C.D. Cal. 2007)

. . . Nimmer & David Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright, § 14.06[B] & n. 76.1 (quoting Superhype Pub., Inc. v. . . . . § 14.06[B] (“Because a permanent injunction is issued only after liability is established, its issuance . . . he scope of the injunction should be coterminous with the infringement.” 4 Nimmer & Nimmer, supra, § 14.06 . . . past harm, while injunctive relief is intended to prevent future harm.”); 4 Nimmer & Nimmer, supra, § 14.06 . . .

ROTHGERY, v. GILLESPIE COUNTY, TEXAS,, 491 F.3d 293 (5th Cir. 2007)

. . . Article 14.06 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure requires that a person arrested without a warrant . . . Ann. art. 14.06. . . .

C. B. FLEET COMPANY, INCORPORATED, v. UNICO HOLDINGS, INC., 510 F. Supp. 2d 1078 (S.D. Fla. 2007)

. . . See Kevin Harrington, 1998 WL 35154990 (citing 4 Nim-mer, § 14.06[A]). . . .

J. BURKETT, v. CITY OF EL PASO, El, 513 F. Supp. 2d 800 (W.D. Tex. 2007)

. . . hours in a misdemeanor case and for up to 48 hours in a felony case before the requirements of articles 14.06 . . .

BITTAKIS, v. CITY OF EL PASO, El El J., 480 F. Supp. 2d 895 (W.D. Tex. 2007)

. . . hours in a misdemeanor case and for up to 48 hours in a felony case before the requirements of articles 14.06 . . .

NITSCH, v. CITY OF EL PASO,, 482 F. Supp. 2d 820 (W.D. Tex. 2007)

. . . State law as basis for Monell claim Nitsch’s claims of a violation of Articles 14.06 and 15.74 of the . . . Nitsch’s claims of violation of Articles 14.06 and 15.74 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure obviously . . .

DEBARY v. HARRAH S OPERATING COMPANY, INC. LLC v., 465 F. Supp. 2d 250 (S.D.N.Y. 2006)

. . . Notwithstanding § 14.06’s boilerplate assertion to the contrary, it is entirely appropriate for this . . .

WEDGEWOOD LIMITED PARTNERSHIP I. v. TOWNSHIP OF LIBERTY, OHIO,, 456 F. Supp. 2d 904 (S.D. Ohio 2006)

. . . See Zoning Resolution §§ 14.01, 14.06(a)-(c) (eff. May 1, 1991). . . . See Zoning Resolution §§ 14.01, 14.06(a)-(c) (eff. May 1, 1991). . . . Id. § 14.06(b)(8). . . . See Liberty Township Zoning Resolution §§ 14.01, 14.06(a)-(c). . . . See Zoning Resolution § 14.06(E) (eff. Oct. 3, 2002). . . . .

MADVIG, v. L. GAITHER, Jr. P. P. II W. O. E. S. J., 461 F. Supp. 2d 398 (W.D.N.C. 2006)

. . . Id., at § 14.06. . . .

ROTHGERY, v. GILLESPIE COUNTY, TEXAS,, 413 F. Supp. 2d 806 (W.D. Tex. 2006)

. . . Ann. art. 14.06(a) (West Supp.2005). . . . Ann. arts. 14.01-14.06 (West 2005 & West. Supp.2005). . . . .

J. CAFFEY v. COOK,, 409 F. Supp. 2d 484 (S.D.N.Y. 2006)

. . . The Limited, 662 F.Supp. 1347, 1358 (S.D.N.Y.1987); Nimmer § 14.06[B] at 14-122. . . .

LGS ARCHITECTS, INC. a LGS a v. CONCORDIA HOMES OF NEVADA,, 434 F.3d 1150 (9th Cir. 2006)

. . . Nim-mer, Nimmer on Copyright § 14.06[A] (2004) (“the plaintiffs burden for obtaining a preliminary injunction . . .

CLONUS ASSOCIATES, v. DREAMWORKS, LLC, 417 F. Supp. 2d 248 (S.D.N.Y. 2005)

. . . Accord Nimmer § 14.06[A] (2005). . See Marisa Christina, 808 F.Supp. at 359. . . . .

FMC CORPORATION, v. CONTROL SOLUTIONS, INC., 369 F. Supp. 2d 539 (E.D. Pa. 2005)

. . . Apple Computer, 714 F.2d at 1254 (citing NimmeR on CopyRight § -14.06[A], at 14-50, 14-51 & n. 16), cert . . .

R. THEISS, v. J. PRINCIPI,, 18 Vet. App. 204 (Vet. App. 2004)

. . . examining the General Counsel opinion itself, the Court notes that that opinion, referring to paragraph 14.06 . . .

Y. SILVERSTEIN, v. PENGUIN PUTNAM, INC., 368 F.3d 77 (2d Cir. 2004)

. . . to remedy infringement where threat of future infringing activity is low); 4 Nimmer on Copyright § 14.06 . . .

In CARLTON, 309 B.R. 67 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 2004)

. . . Hundred (400) of the Six Hundred (600) shares sold under the 1998 Agreement was Fourteen and 06/100($14.06 . . .

K. BARTYZEL, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,, 74 F. App'x 515 (6th Cir. 2003)

. . . contends that her diagnosis of fibromyalgia constitutes a listing level impairment, specifically Listing 14.06 . . . That Listing states: Undifferentiated connective tissue disorder (14.06)This listing includes syndromes . . . P, App. 1, § 14.06. . . . P, App. 1, § 14.00, including Listing 14.06. Moreover, although Dr. . . .

DISTRICT COUNCIL NO. v. APC PAINTING, INC. APC Co. APC Co. Co. Co., 272 F. Supp. 2d 229 (S.D.N.Y. 2003)

. . . had been made at the “market recovery” rate ($6.30 per hour) instead of the “journeyperson” rate ($14.06 . . .

OPEN SOFTWARE FOUNDATION, INC. v. UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY CO., 307 F.3d 11 (1st Cir. 2002)

. . . Stempel, Law of Insurance Contract Disputes § 14.06, at 14-22 (2d ed.2001) (quoting Donald S. . . .

SOFFAR, v. COCKRELL,, 300 F.3d 588 (5th Cir. 2002)

. . . Ann. art. 14.06. . . .

VIDEO PIPELINE, INC. v. BUENA VISTA HOME ENTERTAINMENT, INC. v., 192 F. Supp. 2d 321 (D.N.J. 2002)

. . . Franklin Computer Corp., 714 F.2d 1240, 1254 (3d Cir.1983) (citing 3 Nimmer on Copyright § 14.06[A], . . .

DAYTON TECHNOLOGIES, INC. N. V. v. ALUMINUM COMPANY OF AMERICA, L., 31 F. App'x 179 (6th Cir. 2002)

. . . misrepresentation claim due to the existence of the integration clauses, § 4.23 of the Purchase Agreement and § 14.06 . . .

CHEMICAL SEPARATION TECHNOLOGY, INC. v. UNITED STATES,, 51 Fed. Cl. 771 (Fed. Cl. 2002)

. . . Rosenberg, Patent Law Fundamentals § 14.06[5][c] (2d ed.2001). . . . .

TAYLOR CORPORATION, v. FOUR SEASONS GREETINGS LLC,, 171 F. Supp. 2d 970 (D. Minn. 2001)

. . . Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright, § 14.06[A] n. 6.1). . . .

SUPERGUIDE CORPORATION, a v. DIRECTV ENTERPRISES, INC. a a a a a a a a v., 169 F. Supp. 2d 492 (W.D.N.C. 2001)

. . . ) claim[s]” for which there does not appear to be a definitive name. 3 Moore's Federal Practice, §§ 14.06 . . .

In WRT ENERGY CORPORATION, WRT v. WRT, 282 B.R. 343 (Bankr. W.D. La. 2001)

. . . 32.95221% working interest acquired by WRT from Benton had an estimated fair market value of between $14.06 . . .

THIMBLEBERRIES, INC. v. C F ENTERPRISES, INC. THE MARK GROUP, INC., 142 F. Supp. 2d 1132 (D. Minn. 2001)

. . . Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright, § 14.06[A] n. 6.1). . . .

A M RECORDS, INC. a a MCA Co. v. NAPSTER, INC. v., 239 F.3d 1004 (9th Cir. 2001)

. . . Nim-mer & David Nimmer, Nimmer On Copyright § 14.06[B] (1988)), aff'd, 495 U.S. 207, 110 S.Ct. 1750, . . .

BERKELEY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, v. ARNOLD, WHITE DURKEE,, 118 F. Supp. 2d 668 (D. Md. 2000)

. . . Ribstein, Partnership, Supp.1995, Section 14.06(b). (Citations omitted). . . .

M. MINSKY, v. S. APFEL,, 65 F. Supp. 2d 124 (E.D.N.Y. 1999)

. . . that while the plaintiff had a severe impairment, it did not meet or equal the criteria of Section 14.06 . . . The ALJ found that the plaintiffs condition did not meet the diagnostic criteria of Section 14.06 of . . . Section 14.06 of the Listing of Impairments provides: Undifferentiated connective tissue disorder (14.06 . . . criteria, her impairment, including her symptoms, did not otherwise meet or equal the criteria of Section 14.06 . . . In addition, the ALJ determined that assuming the diagnostic criteria of Section 14.06 were met, Minsky . . .

COBELL, v. BABBITT,, 188 F.R.D. 122 (D.D.C. 1999)

. . . Robert Peregoy $170.00 463.26 $ 78,754.20 Loma Babby $170.00 336.27 $ 57,165.90 James Kawahara $170.00 14.06 . . . Robert Peregoy $170.00 463.26 $ 78,754.20 Loma Babby $170.00 336.27 $ 57,165.90 James Kawahara $170.00 14.06 . . .

EPIC METALS CORP. a v. SOULIERE, Sr. a, 181 F.3d 1280 (11th Cir. 1999)

. . . where plaintiffs seek only statutory damages and injunc-tive relief); see also 4 Nimmer on Copyright § 14.06 . . . See 4 Nimmer on Copyright § 14.06[C]. . . .

UNITED STATES v. DURHAM, UNITED STATES v. EVANS,, 139 F.3d 1325 (10th Cir. 1998)

. . . Devitt et al., Federal Jury Practice and Instructions § 14.06 (4thed.l992). . . . .

SEVERIN MONTRES, LTD. v. YIDAH WATCH CO., 997 F. Supp. 1262 (C.D. Cal. 1997)

. . . Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright § 14.06[A] (Matthew Bender & Co.1997). A. . . .

P. KINASH, v. J. CALLAHAN,, 129 F.3d 736 (5th Cir. 1997)

. . . P, App. 1, Sec. 14.06. Kinash did not raise this issue in the district court. . . . Section 14.06 was first proposed and made public on December 18, 1991. . . . Kinash did not raise § 14.06-in either brief. . . . On October 29, 1996, more than three years after § 14.06 took effect, the magistrate issued his findings . . . Ki-nash objected to those findings, but he still did not raise § 14.06. . . .

CADENCE DESIGN SYSTEMS, INC. a v. AVANT CORPORATION, a, 125 F.3d 824 (9th Cir. 1997)

. . . Nimmer & David Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright § 14.06[A], at 14-105 (1997); see also American Direct Mktg . . . Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright § 14.06[B], at 14-56.2 (1988)). . . . (internal quotation marks omitted); 4 Nimmer, supra, § 14.06[A] at 14-103 (noting that the balance of . . .

HICKS, v. BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS, A. s s, 973 F. Supp. 653 (W.D. Tex. 1997)

. . . merely that the two municipal court judges named as defendants herein failed to comply with Articles 14.06 . . . defendants Smith and Mitchell failed to perform unspecified duties assigned to magistrates by Articles 14.06 . . . See Article 14.06(b), Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Annotated (Vernon Supp.1997); and Sections 543.003 . . . See Article 14.06(b), Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Annotated (Vernon Supp. 1997); and Section 543.003 . . .

J. FISHER, v. VASSAR COLLEGE,, 114 F.3d 1332 (2d Cir. 1997)

. . . Lacey, 459 F.2d 86, 89 (2d Cir.1972); 1 Devitt et al., supra, § 14.06; 1 Sand et al., supra, ¶ 6.05 ( . . .

CROOMS, v. P. O. MERCADO, NO., 955 F. Supp. 985 (N.D. Ill. 1997)

. . . Decker, Illinois Criminal Law § 14.06 (1993). . . .

LONE STAR STEAKHOUSE SALOON, INC. v. LONGHORN STEAKS, INC. LONE STAR STEAKS, INC. v. LONE STAR STEAKHOUSE SALOON OF GEORGIA, INC., 106 F.3d 355 (11th Cir. 1997)

. . . McCarthy at § 14.06; California Cooler, Inc. v. . . . McCarthy at § 14.06; California Cooler, 774 F.2d at 1455. R3-43-23-24. . . .

PRINCETON UNIVERSITY PRESS, St. s v. MICHIGAN DOCUMENT SERVICES, INC. M., 99 F.3d 1381 (6th Cir. 1996)

. . . (1990) (discussing tension between First Amendment and injunctions in copyright cases); 3 Nimmer § 14.06 . . .

L ANZA RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. QUALITY KING DISTRIBUTORS, INC. a, 98 F.3d 1109 (9th Cir. 1996)

. . . .1981), rev’d on other grounds, 464 U.S. 417, 104 S.Ct. 774, 78 L.Ed.2d 574 (1984); see also 8 Nimmer § 14.06 . . .

WATTS HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. a d b a a v. UNITED HEALTHCARE CORPORATION, a a, 960 F. Supp. 1431 (C.D. Cal. 1996)

. . . McCarthy, McCarthy on Trademarks and Unfair Competition, § 14.06, p. 14-25. . . .

HAROLDS STORES, INC. CMT v. DILLARD DEPARTMENT STORES, INC. HAROLDS STORES, INC. v. DILLARD DEPARTMENT STORES, INC., 82 F.3d 1533 (10th Cir. 1996)

. . . Nimmer & David Nimmer, Nimmer On Copyright § 14.06[B], at 14-98 (1995) (“[A] showing of past infringement . . . Nimmer & Nimmer, § 14.06[B], at 14-97 to 14-98. . . . See Walt Disney Co., 897 F.2d at 567; Nimmer & Nimmer, § 14.06[B], at 14-97 to 14-98. . . .

LIPTON, v. NATURE COMPANY,, 71 F.3d 464 (2d Cir. 1995)

. . . limited in scope to that part of the work that is protectible. 3 Nimmer & Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright § 14.06 . . .

RELIGIOUS TECHNOLOGY CENTER, a a v. NETCOM ON- LINE COMMUNICATION SERVICES, INC. a, 923 F. Supp. 1231 (N.D. Cal. 1995)

. . . See 3 Nimmer § 14.06[C], at 14-106 to -109 (noting that scope of injunction should be coterminous with . . . Cf. 3 Nimmer § 14.06[C], at 14-107 to -109; RCA Records v. . . .

RELIGIOUS TECHNOLOGY CENTER, a v. F. A. C. T. NET, INC. a, 901 F. Supp. 1519 (D. Colo. 1995)

ESTATE OF SOLER, v. RODR GUEZ,, 63 F.3d 45 (1st Cir. 1995)

. . . The plaintiffs’ 652,500 shares represented 43.68% of the total; UCMSJB's 210,000 represented 14.06%, . . .

PICKER INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, v. IMAGING EQUIPMENT SERVICES, INC., 931 F. Supp. 18 (D. Mass. 1995)

. . . McBee & Bruno’s, Inc., 792 F.2d 726, 732 (8th Cir.1986); 3 Nimmer on Copyright, § 14.06[B] at 14-88. . . . been adjudicated, but also to any other works presently owned by plaintiff.” 3 Nimmer on Copyright § 14.06 . . .

GRAY, v. E. THOMPSON, GRAY, v. E. THOMPSON,, 58 F.3d 59 (4th Cir. 1995)

. . . Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practice § 14.06[4], App. 14-102.5 (2d ed.1994)). . . .

AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER CORPORATION OF AMERICA, v. DARLA ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALISTS INC. UNITED STATES, 53 F.3d 181 (7th Cir. 1995)

. . . See Model Business Corporation Act §§ 14.06, 14.07. . . .

CENTRAL POINT SOFTWARE, INC. v. GLOBAL SOFTWARE ACCESSORIES, INC., 880 F. Supp. 957 (E.D.N.Y. 1995)

. . . . § 502(a); Nimmer, supra § 14.06[B], at 14-94.3 to -94.4; see, e.g., Encyclopedia Britannica Educ. . . .

COMMITTEE FOR IDAHO S HIGH DESERT, v. A. YOST, s, 881 F. Supp. 1457 (D. Idaho 1995)

. . . See McCarthy, §§ 11.10[1] at 11-45; 14.06 at 14-21— 14-23 (extensively citing cases). 90. . . .

PRACTICE MANAGEMENT INFORMATION CORPORATION, a v. AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION,, 877 F. Supp. 1394 (C.D. Cal. 1994)

. . . Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright, § 14.06[A], at pp. 14-85 to 14-86 (1994). 2. . . .

TURNER, v. A. WILLIAMS,, 35 F.3d 872 (4th Cir. 1994)

. . . Moore et al., Moore's Federal Practice § 14.06[4], App. 14-102.5 (2d ed.1994).. . . .

CENTRAL POINT SOFTWARE, INC. v. GLOBAL SOFTWARE ASSESSORIES, INC., 859 F. Supp. 640 (E.D.N.Y. 1994)

. . . Nimmer & David Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright, ¶ 14.06[A], at 14-84 to -85 (1993) (footnotes omitted). . . .

BLOOM, v. VASQUEZ,, 840 F. Supp. 1362 (C.D. Cal. 1993)

. . . O’Malley, Federal Jury Practice and Instructions: Civil and Criminal § 14.06 (4th ed. 1992); 1. . . .