Florida/Georgia Personal Injury & Workers Compensation

You're probably overthinking it. Call a lawyer.

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 951.24 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 951.24 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 951.24 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 951.24

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XLVII
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AND CORRECTIONS
Chapter 951
COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL PRISONERS
View Entire Chapter
951.24 Extend the limits of confinement for county prisoners.
(1) Any county shall be deemed to have a work-release program upon the motion of that county’s board of county commissioners which shall require the concurrence of the sheriff of the county.
(2)(a) Whenever punishment by imprisonment in the county jail is prescribed, the sentencing court, in its discretion, may at any time during the sentence consider granting the privilege to the prisoner to leave the confines of the jail or county facility during necessary and reasonable hours, subject to the rules and regulations prescribed by the court, to work at paid employment, conduct his or her own business or profession, or participate in an educational or vocational training program, while continuing as an inmate of the county facility in which he or she shall be confined except during the period of his or her authorized release.
(b) Any prisoner, at the time of sentencing or thereafter, may request the court in writing for the privilege of being placed on the work-release program. The Department of Corrections, upon the request of the court, is authorized to conduct such investigations as are necessary and to make recommendations to the court pertaining to the suitability of the plan for the prisoner and to supervise such prisoner if released under this program. Such a release may be granted by the court with the advice and consent of the sheriff and upon agreement by the prisoner. The court may withdraw the privilege at any time, with or without notice.
(c) No person convicted of sexual battery pursuant to s. 794.011 is eligible for any work-release program or any other extension of the limits of confinement under this section.
(3)(a) The wages or salary of prisoners employed under this program may be disbursed by the sheriff pursuant to court order for the following purposes in the order listed:
1. Board of the prisoner.
2. Necessary travel expense to and from work and other necessary incidental expenses of the prisoner.
3. Support of the prisoner’s legal dependents.
4. Payment, either in full or ratable, of the prisoner’s obligations acknowledged by him or her in writing or which have been reduced to judgment.
5. The balance to the prisoner upon discharge from his or her sentence, or until an order of the court is entered declaring that the prisoner has left lawful confinement, declaring that the balance remaining is forfeited, and directing the sheriff to deposit the funds in the general fund of the county to be spent for general purposes.
(b) The sheriff may collect from a prisoner the wages or salary earned pursuant to this program. The sheriff shall deposit the same in a trust checking account and shall keep a ledger showing the status of the account of each prisoner. Such wages and salaries shall not be subject to garnishment in the hands of either the employer or the sheriff during the prisoner’s sentence and shall be disbursed only as provided in this section.
(c) Every prisoner gainfully employed is liable for the cost of his or her board in the jail as fixed by the county. The sheriff shall charge the prisoner’s account, if he or she has one, for such board. If the prisoner is gainfully self-employed he or she shall deposit with the sheriff an amount determined by the court sufficient to accomplish the provisions of subparagraphs (a)1.-5., in default of which his or her privileges under this section are automatically forfeited.
(d) The board of county commissioners of any county may, upon the recommendation of the sheriff, authorize the person in charge of a county stockade or workcamp to implement paragraphs (a), (b), and (c), when such facility is not directly under the sheriff.
(4) Any prisoner who willfully fails to remain within the extended limits of his or her confinement or to return within the time prescribed to the place of confinement shall be deemed an escapee from custody and shall be subject to punishment as prescribed by law.
(5) Exchange for the purpose of work-release of county prisoners among other counties of the state that have implemented work-release programs is hereby authorized, with the concurrence of the sheriffs of the involved counties. For the purpose of this subsection, upon exchange, the prisoner shall be deemed a prisoner of the county where confined unless or until he or she is removed from extended confinement status. Prisoners from other jurisdictions, serving lawful sentences, may also be received into a county work-release program as above provided.
(6) In carrying out the purpose of this section, any board of county commissioners may provide in its annual budget for payment to the Department of Corrections out of funds collected from those being supervised such amounts as are agreed upon by the board and department to be reasonable and necessary. County judges are hereby authorized to levy $10 per month upon those supervised for purposes of paying for supervision under this act.
History.s. 1, ch. 69-143; s. 6, ch. 75-301; s. 100, ch. 77-120; s. 118, ch. 79-3; s. 3, ch. 83-274; s. 23, ch. 93-156; s. 1702, ch. 97-102.
Note.Former s. 948.07.

F.S. 951.24 on Google Scholar

F.S. 951.24 on CourtListener

Amendments to 951.24


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 951.24

Total Results: 21  |  Sort by: Relevance  |  Newest First

Copy

McCarthy v. State, 689 So. 2d 1095 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1997 WL 34653

...ion to grant credit for such home confinement and routinely do so. He is concerned that unless we clarify our opinion or certify the issue, the judges in Orange County—and other counties which have implemented alternative jail sanctions pursuant to section 951.24, Florida Statutes—will be in doubt as to their authority to exercise their discretion to allow such credit. We adhere to our original opinion. We find no authority in section 951.24 which would permit the county to provide an incarceration alternative which does not require lodging in a county facility....
...ducational or vocational training program, while continuing as an inmate of the county facility in which he shall be confined except during *1097 the period of his authorized release. (Emphasis added.) When we read this provision in conjunction with section 951.24(3)(d) which authorizes the county commission, upon the recommendation of the sheriff, to "authorize the person in charge of a county stockade or work camp to implement paragraphs (a), (b), and (c) [the procedure for collecting the pris...
Copy

City of Plantation v. Humana, Inc., 429 So. 2d 37 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

...Under the statutory definitions he was not a "county prisoner" because he was never detained in a county detention facility, nor was he a "municipal prisoner" because he was not being detained for violation of municipal laws. Therefore, it is apparent that Section 951.24, Florida Statutes does not furnish a basis to establish responsibility on appellant for payment of Toth's bill....
Copy

State v. Williams, 918 So. 2d 400 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2006 WL 120155

...ted under a contract with the state, a county, or a municipality, working upon the public roads, or being transported to or from a place of confinement who escapes or attempts to escape from such confinement commits a felony of the second degree.... Section 951.24(2)(a), Florida Statutes (2004), provides that an inmate participating in a work release program shall continue "as an inmate of the county facility in which he or she shall be confined except during the period of his or her authorized release." According to Gregory v....
...an escapee only upon failure to return to the facility—or on authorized release during only those periods of the day in which he was performing authorized tasks—traveling to work, working, and traveling home from work. The State argues that under section 951.24 and Gregory, Williams was on "authorized release" during only the few minutes it took him to get to work; if he detoured, he was no longer on "authorized release" and thus an escapee. We disagree. The phrase "authorized release" in section 951.24(2)(a) creates an exception to being an inmate confined in a "facility." According to the plain language of the statute, Williams is an inmate when he is confined in a facility....
...He is not suddenly escaping from a confinement facility when he arrives at work late, regardless of the reason. Rather, Williams is on authorized release from the time he leaves the work release center to go to work until the prescribed time for his return. See § 951.24(4), Fla....
...5th DCA 1996) ("We would agree with [the defendant charged with escape] if the state had *402 relied only on his failure to report to work. . . ."). We agree with the Fifth District's suggestion. Williams was not a confined inmate under sections 944.40 and 951.24 when he was released from the work release center....
Copy

Early v. State, 678 So. 2d 901 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1996 WL 476331

...He remained throughout this period under an order of incarceration. He was released from incarceration only so long as he complied with the conditions of that release. He was, in a sense, *902 "furloughed" from the Work Release Facility so long as he reported to work as required. Section 951.24(4), Florida Statutes (1995), provides: Any prisoner who willfully fails to remain within the extended limits of his confinement or to return within the time prescribed to the place of confinement shall be deemed an escapee from custody and shall be subject to punishment as prescribed by law....
Copy

Price v. State, 333 So. 2d 84 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

...secutive to the term then being served. Florida Statute 944.40 clearly provides that a prisoner who escapes from confinement in a county jail shall be guilty of a second degree felony. The legislature, by the adoption of Florida Statutes 945.091 and 951.24, has recognized that a prisoner may still be regarded as "confined" even though not physically present in a state or county correctional facility....
...of the Department of Offender Rehabilitation. It is broad in scope, authorizing the extension of the limits of confinement for various purposes, including, generally, the visiting of places to aid in the rehabilitation of the inmate. Florida Statute 951.24 relates to county prisoners, such as appellant herein....
...Under both statutes, failure to return to the place of confinement within the time prescribed constitutes an escape. Appellant argues that Florida Statute 945.091 is inapplicable to him because it deals with state facilities, not county jails. He also argues that Florida Statute 951.24 is inapplicable, since he was simply on furlough and not working. Therefore, he could not be charged with escape because there is no statutory provision dealing with the factual situation presented by this case. This court declines to construe Florida Statutes 944.40 and 951.24 in a manner which would permit a county prisoner whose furlough became a "lost weekend" to remain at-large indefinitely without punishment, while subjecting a prisoner slow in returning from vocational school to be charged with the commission of a felony....
Copy

George v. United States, 650 F. Supp. 2d 1196 (M.D. Fla. 2009).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44788, 2009 WL 1370858

...In this case, Plaintiff simply failed to return to jail from his employment under a work release program. While participating in a work release program, an inmate shall continue "as an inmate of the county facility in *1200 which he or she shall be confined except during the period of his or her authorized release." § 951.24(2)(a), Fla....
Copy

Gregory v. State, 573 So. 2d 397 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1991 WL 3571

...[2] The trial court denied the motion, and Gregory pled no contest to the escape charge, reserving the right to appeal the issue of confinement. The state contends that Gregory was within the extended limits for confinement of county prisoners authorized by the work release statute. See § 951.24, Fla. Stat. (1987). [3] We disagree. Section 951.24 requires that an inmate participating in a work release program shall continue "as an inmate of the county facility in which he shall be confined except during the period of his authorized release." Authorized release means those hours...
...NOTES [1] The record does not contain a detailed explanation of the "in house arrest program of the Hillsborough County Jail." Comments of the prosecutor to the court indicate that the program is a form of house arrest similar in design to community control. The authority for the program is cited as § 951.24, Fla....
...— Any prisoner confined in any prison, jail, road camp, or other penal institution, state, county or municipal, working upon the public roads, or being transported to or from a place of confinement who escapes ... shall be guilty of a felony of the second degree... . [3] 951.24 Extend the limits of confinement for county prisoners....
Copy

Banasik v. State, 889 So. 2d 916 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 18823, 2004 WL 3027946

...In pertinent part, the information alleged that Mr. Banasik, “while a prisoner in the lawful custody of a law enforcement officer and while being transported to or from a place of confinement, did escape or attempt to escape from such custody,” contrary to sections 944.40 and 951.24, Florida Statutes (2002)....
...ts a felony of the second degree.... At trial, the parties stipulated that Mr. Banasik had been convicted of an offense and had been sentenced to thirty days in the county jail, to be served on work release through the community maintenance program. Section 951.24(4), which concerns work-release programs, provides: Any person who willfully fails to remain within the extended limits of his or her confinement or to return within the time prescribed to the place of confinement shall be deemed an escapee from custody and shall be subject to punishment as prescribed by law....
Copy

State v. Poillot, 173 So. 3d 1070 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 11802, 2015 WL 4660119

Fla. Admin. Code R. 33-601.602 (2014). . Section 951.24, Florida Statutes, addresses the extension
Copy

Howell v. State, 45 So. 3d 527 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 14872, 2010 WL 3783700

...Following the court's denial of Appellant's motion to dismiss, the state moved in limine to preclude Appellant from arguing to the jury that he could not be guilty of escape because he was not confined while on work release. In granting the state's motion, the trial court again ruled correctly. Section 951.24, Florida Statutes, which authorizes county work release programs, states that "[a]ny prisoner who willfully fails to remain within the extended limits of his or her confinement or to return within the time prescribed to the place of confinement shall be deemed an escapee from custody and shall be subject to punishment as prescribed by law." § 951.24(4), Fla....
...Appellant's purported defense is flatly contradicted by the plain language of the statute, and thus, contrary to law. See Early v. State, 678 So.2d 901 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996) (appellant's failure to timely return to work release facility constituted escape under section 951.24(4), Florida Statutes)....
Copy

Pumphrey v. State, 512 So. 2d 1018 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2095, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10068

the trial court relied upon the provisions of Section 951.24. The information charging the offense of escape
Copy

Marshall v. State, 540 So. 2d 921 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 14 Fla. L. Weekly 803, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1655, 1989 WL 30817

...ns, we remand for an evidentiary hearing on this point. Appellant also alleges that his counsel told him, prior to pleading, that he would be eligible for work release if he pled guilty. However, sex offenders are not eligible for work release under Section 951.24(2)(c), Florida Statutes....
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1992).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

commission and the concurrence of the sheriff. Section 951.24, F.S., provides: (1) Any county shall
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 2004).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

limits of confinement beyond those enumerated in section 951.24, Florida Statutes, to allow a county prisoner
Copy

Fuller v. State, 724 So. 2d 727 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 994, 1999 WL 49153

PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See, § 951.24(4), Fla....
Copy

In Re: Stand. Jury Instructions in Crim. Cases - Report 2019-11 (Fla. 2020).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida

...This instruction was adopted in 2015 [163 So. 3d 478] and amended in 2018 [257 So. 3d 370], and 2020. 27.1 [ATTEMPTED] ESCAPE § 944.40, Fla. Stat. (including § 945.091(4), Fla. Stat. and § 951.24(4), Fla....
Copy

Claudio v. SHOAR, 917 So. 2d 340 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2005 WL 3499910

...District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. December 23, 2005. *341 Raymond Claudio, St. Augustine, Pro Se. No Appearance for Appellee. ORFINGER, J. Raymond Claudio appeals the trial court's denial of his petition for writ of mandamus. Claudio argues that under section 951.24, Florida Statutes (2005), the trial court is authorized to grant work release as part of a defendant's sentence, and that the St....
...work release. Claudio then filed a grievance, appealing his denial of work release. Before receiving an answer to his grievance, Claudio filed a petition seeking a writ of mandamus, claiming that St. Johns County's eligibility requirements violated section 951.24, Florida Statutes (2005). [1] Claudio also argued that the Sheriff was not authorized under section 951.24 to exclude him from the work release program....
...y clearly and certainly established in the law." Milanick v. Town of Beverly Beach, 820 So.2d 317, 320 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001) (citing Fla. League of Cities v. Smith, 607 So.2d 397, 400-01 (Fla.1992)). In this case, Claudio had no right to work release. Section 951.24(2)(a), Florida Statutes (2005), governing work release programs, provides, in pertinent part: (2)(a) Whenever punishment by imprisonment in the county jail is prescribed, *342 the sentencing court, in its discretion, may at any time du...
Copy

Andrew A. Rodriguez v. State, 224 So. 3d 811 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2017 WL 3318009, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 11282

funeral of a relative,” among other events. Section 951.24, Florida Statutes (2014), extends the limits
Copy

In Re Stand. Jury Instructions in Crim. Cases-report No. 2016-02, 199 So. 3d 234 (Fla. 2016).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 2016 WL 4480340

(including § 945.091(4), Fla. Stat. and § 951.24(4), Fla. Stat.) To prove the crime of [Attempted]
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1979).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

record-keeping requirements. AS TO QUESTION 1: Section 951.24(1), F. S., provides for the establishment of
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1975).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

QUESTION: Do the provisions of s. 951.24 (1), F.S., relating to county work-release programs require that the sheriff of the county concur in the concept of a work-release program before such a program is instituted, or does it require only that he approve the individuals who are allowed to participate in the program once it is established? SUMMARY: Section 951.24 (1) and (3), F.S., provides that the county sheriff's approval is to be obtained prior to the institution of a work-release program and prior to court placement of any prisoner into such a program. Section 951.24 (1) provides in part that [a]ny county shall be deemed to have a work-release program upon the motion of that county's board of county commissioners which shall require the concurrence of the sheriff of said county....
...ar and definite meaning, there is no occasion for resort to the rules of statutory construction. White v. Campbell, 215 So.2d 66 . The plain and obvious provisions must control. Southeastern Utilities Service Co. v. Redding, 131 So.2d 1 (Fla. 1961). Section 951.24 (1), F.S., provides that the county sheriff must concur in the county commissioners' decision to institute a workrelease program for prisoners of the county jail. Section 951.24 (3) provides that prisoners of the county jail, once incarcerated, may request in writing to be placed on the county's work-release program if one has been implemented. Such a request "may be granted by the court with the advice and consent of the sheriff and upon agreement by the prisoner." When subsections 951.24 (1) and (3) are read in pari materia, it is evident that the Legislature intended to give the county sheriff both the power to share in the decision to institute a county work-release program and the power to share in the decision regarding the placement of individual prisoners in such a program. Therefore, s. 951.24 (1) requires that the county commission secure the approval of the county sheriff before it may establish a county work-release program for county prisoners.

This Florida statute resource is curated by Graham W. Syfert, Esq., a Jacksonville, Florida personal injury and workers' compensation attorney. For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.