Cases from cite.case.law:

. . . valid written contract between the parties limiting his ability to assert parental rights, section 742.14 . . . T.M.H., 129 So.3d 320, 328 (Fla.2013) (holding section 742.14 “unconstitutional as applied under the . . .

. . . The Fifth District Court of Appeal was required to interpret the term “donor” as used in section 742.14 . . . that the woman who provided the egg to conceive the child was not considered a “donor” under section 742.14 . . . On review, the Florida Supreme Court disagreed with the Fifth District that section 742.14 did not apply . . . Further, the court concluded that section 742.14 was unconstitutional as applied to the wbman who provided . . .

. . . Because the application of section 742.14 operated to automatically deprive T.M.H. of her ability to . . . See §§ 742.13(2), 742.14, Fla. Stat. . . . Sections 742.13 and 742.14 In the decision below, the Fifth District determined that section 742.14, . . . Further, we necessarily must read sections 742.13 and 742.14 together. See Fla. . . . See § 742.14, Fla. Stat. . . . Unlike the majority, I do not believe that sections 742.14 and 742.13(2), Florida Statutes, violate T.M.H . . . The Fifth District reversed the trial court, holding that section 742.14 is inapplicable because T.M.H . . . Although in her complaint T.M.H. alleged that section 742.14 violated her rights to equal protection . . . Id. at 319 (citing § 742.14, Fla. Stat.). . . . Here, the plain language of section 742.14 applies to T.M.H. as “[t]he donor of any egg.” . . .

. . . Because under section 742.14, Florida Statutes (2002), B.O.C. is a sperm donor, and therefore has no . . . A.A.B. argued that under section 742.14, B.O.C. relinquished all paternal rights and obligations with . . . The issue presented in this appeal is whether section 742.14 applies to deny parental rights to a sperm . . . See § 742.14. . . . Section 742.14, provides, in pertinent part, The donor of any egg, sperm, or preem-bryo, other than the . . .

. . . believe the majority misses the mark in its analysis of the controlling statute in this case, section 742.14 . . . Section 742.14, Florida Statutes. A. . . . Section 742.14, Florida Statutes (2008), provides that: [T]he donor of any egg, sperm, or preembryo . . . . As such, Appellant effectively concedes that section 742.14, by its plain language, bars her claim. . . . Of course, Appellant never argued for this extraordinary reading of section 742.14. . . . She argues that section 742.14, Florida Statutes, denies an ovum donor any parental rights to the child . . . Application and Interpretation of Section 742.14 by the Trial Court and the Dissent. . . . The trial court held that Appellant is a “donor” of her ova and that the provisions of section 742.14 . . . Section 742.14 provides that: Donation of eggs, sperm, or preembr-yos The donor of any egg, sperm, or . . . In addition, pursuant to the trial court’s application of section 742.14, Appellant’s right to form a . . . First, it is clear to me that section 742.14, Florida Statutes (2009), simply does not apply to the fact . . .

. . . The mother asserted that section 742.14, Florida Statutes (2008), barred the paternity claim because . . . The father contended that section 742.14 did not bar his paternity claim because the parties were “a . . . there are no genuine issues of material fact and that she is entitled to judgment pursuant to section 742.14 . . . Section 742.14 provides: “The donor of any egg, sperm, or preembryo, other than the commissioning couple . . . Thus, the father claimed to be part of a commissioning couple and exempt from section 742.14. . . .

. . . For example, section 742.14, Florida Statutes (2002), provides that “[o]nly reasonable compensation directly . . .

. . . defense of the action, the recipient alleged that the contract barred such an action, that section 742.14 . . . In the opinion, after considering the express language of section 742.14, Florida Statutes (1997), this . . . See § 742.14. . . . Section 742.14 provides in pertinent part: "The donor of any egg, sperm, or preembryo, other than the . . .

. . . Respondent further contends that he is not the natural father but merely a sperm donor under section 742.14 . . . However, the legislative act which created section 742.14 concerned “reproductive technology.” . . . Therefore, we do not read section 742.14 to apply to a conception that happened the old-fashioned way . . .

. . . defense of the action, the recipient alleged that the contract barred such an action, that section 742.14 . . . this testing, while acknowledging that the court had not yet ruled upon the applicability of section 742.14 . . . submit to testing at this time, and direct the trial court to determine the applicability of section 742.14 . . . Section 742.14, entitled “Donation of eggs, sperm or preembryos,” reads: The donor of any egg, sperm, . . .