Florida/Georgia Personal Injury & Workers Compensation

You're probably overthinking it. Call a lawyer.

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 490.009 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 490.009 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 490.009 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 490.009

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XXXII
REGULATION OF PROFESSIONS AND OCCUPATIONS
Chapter 490
PSYCHOLOGICAL SERVICES
View Entire Chapter
490.009 Discipline.
(1) The following acts constitute grounds for denial of a license or disciplinary action, as specified in s. 456.072(2) or s. 490.0075:
(a) Attempting to obtain, obtaining, or renewing a license under this chapter by bribery or fraudulent misrepresentation or through an error of the board or department.
(b) Having a license to practice a comparable profession revoked, suspended, or otherwise acted against, including the denial of certification or licensure by another state, territory, or country.
(c) Being convicted or found guilty, regardless of adjudication, of a crime in any jurisdiction which directly relates to the practice of his or her profession or the ability to practice his or her profession. A plea of nolo contendere creates a rebuttable presumption of guilt of the underlying criminal charges. However, the board shall allow the person who is the subject of the disciplinary proceeding to present any evidence relevant to the underlying charges and circumstances surrounding the plea.
(d) False, deceptive, or misleading advertising or obtaining a fee or other thing of value on the representation that beneficial results from any treatment will be guaranteed.
(e) Advertising, practicing, or attempting to practice under a name other than one’s own.
(f) Maintaining a professional association with any person who the applicant or licensee knows, or has reason to believe, is in violation of this chapter or of a rule of the department or, in the case of psychologists, of the department or the board.
(g) Knowingly aiding, assisting, procuring, or advising any nonlicensed person to hold himself or herself out as licensed under this chapter.
(h) Failing to perform any statutory or legal obligation placed upon a person licensed under this chapter.
(i) Willfully making or filing a false report or record; failing to file a report or record required by state or federal law; willfully impeding or obstructing the filing of a report or record; or inducing another person to make or file a false report or record or to impede or obstruct the filing of a report or record. Such report or record includes only a report or record which requires the signature of a person licensed under this chapter.
(j) Paying a kickback, rebate, bonus, or other remuneration for receiving a patient or client, or receiving a kickback, rebate, bonus, or other remuneration for referring a patient or client to another provider of mental health care services or to a provider of health care services or goods; referring a patient or client to oneself for services on a fee-paid basis when those services are already being paid for by some other public or private entity; or entering into a reciprocal referral agreement.
(k) Committing any act upon a patient or client which would constitute sexual battery or which would constitute sexual misconduct as defined in s. 490.0111.
(l) Making misleading, deceptive, untrue, or fraudulent representations in the practice of any profession licensed under this chapter.
(m) Soliciting patients or clients personally, or through an agent, through the use of fraud, intimidation, undue influence, or a form of overreaching or vexatious conduct.
(n) Failing to make available to a patient or client, upon written request, copies of test results, reports, or documents in the possession or under the control of the licensee which have been prepared for and paid for by the patient or client.
(o) Failing to respond within 30 days to a written communication from the department concerning any investigation by the department or to make available any relevant records with respect to any investigation about the licensee’s conduct or background.
(p) Being unable to practice the profession for which he or she is licensed under this chapter with reasonable skill or competence as a result of any mental or physical condition or by reason of illness; drunkenness; or excessive use of drugs, narcotics, chemicals, or any other substance. In enforcing this paragraph, upon a finding by the State Surgeon General, the State Surgeon General’s designee, or the board that probable cause exists to believe that the licensee is unable to practice the profession because of the reasons stated in this paragraph, the department shall have the authority to compel a licensee to submit to a mental or physical examination by psychologists or physicians designated by the department or board. If the licensee refuses to comply with the department’s order, the department may file a petition for enforcement in the circuit court of the circuit in which the licensee resides or does business. The licensee may not be named or identified by initials in the petition or in any other public court records or documents, and the enforcement proceedings shall be closed to the public. The department shall be entitled to the summary procedure provided in s. 51.011. A licensee affected under this paragraph shall be afforded an opportunity at reasonable intervals to demonstrate that he or she can resume the competent practice for which he or she is licensed with reasonable skill and safety to patients.
(q) Performing any treatment or prescribing any therapy which, by the prevailing standards of the mental health professions in the community, would constitute experimentation on human subjects, without first obtaining full, informed, and written consent.
(r) Failing to meet the minimum standards of performance in professional activities when measured against generally prevailing peer performance, including the undertaking of activities for which the licensee is not qualified by training or experience.
(s) Delegating professional responsibilities to a person whom the licensee knows or has reason to know is not qualified by training or experience to perform such responsibilities.
(t) Violating a rule relating to the regulation of the profession or a lawful order of the department previously entered in a disciplinary hearing.
(u) Failing to maintain in confidence a communication made by a patient or client in the context of such services, except as provided in s. 490.0147.
(v) Making public statements which are derived from test data, client contacts, or behavioral research and which identify or damage research subjects or clients.
(w) Violating any provision of this chapter or chapter 456, or any rules adopted pursuant thereto.
(2)(a) The department, or in the case of psychologists, the board, may enter an order denying licensure or imposing any of the penalties in s. 456.072(2) against any applicant for licensure or licensee who is found guilty of violating any provision of subsection (1) of this section or who is found guilty of violating any provision of s. 456.072(1).
(b) The board may take adverse action against a psychologist’s authority to practice interjurisdictional telepsychology or his or her temporary authorization to practice under the Psychology Interjurisdictional Compact pursuant to s. 490.0075, and may impose any of the penalties in s. 456.072(2) if a psychologist commits an act specified in subsection (1) or s. 456.072(1).
History.ss. 1, 3, ch. 81-235; s. 35, ch. 83-215; ss. 1, 3, ch. 83-265; s. 9, ch. 84-203; ss. 8, 18, 19, ch. 87-252; s. 36, ch. 88-392; ss. 6, 12, 13, ch. 89-70; s. 10, ch. 90-192; s. 4, ch. 91-429; s. 112, ch. 92-149; s. 8, ch. 95-279; s. 228, ch. 96-410; s. 1135, ch. 97-103; s. 6, ch. 97-198; s. 198, ch. 97-264; s. 150, ch. 98-166; s. 209, ch. 2000-160; s. 52, ch. 2001-277; s. 27, ch. 2005-240; s. 102, ch. 2008-6; s. 8, ch. 2019-134; s. 7, ch. 2023-140.

F.S. 490.009 on Google Scholar

F.S. 490.009 on CourtListener

Amendments to 490.009


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 490.009

Total Results: 9  |  Sort by: Relevance  |  Newest First

Copy

State v. Jones, 642 So. 2d 804 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994).

Cited 7 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1994 WL 501296

...Accordingly, we must reverse the dismissal order and remand this cause to the trial court for reinstatement of the charges against Jones and for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. [6] REVERSED and REMANDED. COBB and W. SHARP, JJ., concur. NOTES [1] See § 490.009, Fla....
Copy

Marrero v. Dept. of Pro. Reg., 622 So. 2d 1109 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1993 WL 299508

...Marrero's Texas license had been and remained suspended by the regulatory body in Texas, and made the following "conclusion of law": [T]he applicant's license having been suspended in Texas because of the applicant's felony conviction, the Board has the authority to permanently deny the application here. Section 490.009, Florida Statutes....
...ation and that the Board will not entertain a renewed application at any future time. The Board merely argues that when it finds that an applicant's license to practice psychology has been suspended in another state, it has the authority pursuant to section 490.009(1)(a), Florida Statutes, to deny the application....
...The issue is not whether the Board had the statutory authority to deny Dr. Marrero's application for a license to practice psychology based on her felony conviction and related license suspension in the state of Texas. Clearly, the Board had such authority. See § 490.009(1)(a), (2)(b) and (c), Fla....
...ded July 18, 1988, and in effect when this matter was considered by the Board, stated in pertinent part: (1) When the Board finds an applicant or licensee whom it regulates under Chapter 490, F.S., has committed any of the acts set forth in Section [490.009(2) [2] ], F.S., it shall issue a final order imposing *1112 appropriate penalties as recommended in the following disciplinary guidelines....
...However, the Board stipulated prior to appeal that Dr. Marrero's lack of a course in this subject does not pose a permanent impediment to her licensure. [2] The rule mistakenly cites section 490.002(2). There is no subsection (2) to section 490.002, and the parties agree that 490.009 is the statute to which the rule is intended to refer....
Copy

Brown v. Dept. of Pro. Reg., Bd. of Psych. Examiners, 602 So. 2d 1337 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1992 WL 170980

...d because that issue was adjudicated in appellant's favor in a prior administrative proceeding between Dr. Brown and the Board. The Department filed an administrative complaint against Dr. Brown in August 1989, alleging that he had violated sections 490.009(2)(k), (p), and (s), and 490.0111, Florida Statutes (1981-1986), by reason of his love affair with R.B., a woman who was his former patient. The Department voluntarily dismissed the counts of that complaint charging Dr. Brown with violating sections 490.009(2)(k) and 490.0111, which left for hearing and decision only the alleged violations of subsections (p) and (s)....
...The 1989 case proceeded to formal hearing before a hearing officer from the Division of Administrative Hearings. Based on the evidence received, the hearing officer entered a recommended order finding that the evidence failed to prove the allegation that Dr. Brown had violated section 490.009(2)(p) by being unable to practice psychology with reasonable skill or competence as a result of illness, drunkenness, or excessive use of drugs, narcotics, chemicals, or any other substance. The hearing officer also found that the evidence did not establish any nexus between Dr. Brown's conduct and his practice of psychology and thus did not establish that Dr. Brown had violated section 490.009(2)(s)....
...On June 19, 1990 (ten days before the final order was entered in the 1989 case), the Department filed a second complaint against Dr. Brown alleging that during the time Dr. Brown was engaged in his love affair with R.B., he was providing psychological services to the children of R.B. and this was a possible violation of section 490.009(2)(s), Florida Statutes....
...Brown, stating in pertinent part: This letter is sent to inform you of the action in regard to the above-referenced complaint. This complaint concerned allegations that you failed to meet minimum standards of performance in professional activities in violation of Section 490.009(2)(s), Florida Statutes....
...(Emphasis added.) The sole allegation contained in that 1990 complaint reads as follows: [Dr. Brown] stated during testimony in previous DPR case (89-0599 DOAH) that he had engaged in a love affair with a client whose children he was counseling. Possible violation of Section 490.009(2)(s), F.S. The 1989 complaint alleged, inter alia, that Dr. Brown had participated in a romantic/sexual affair with a woman (R.B.) he was counseling and this conduct violated subsection 490.009(2)(s), Florida Statutes. Subsection 490.009(2)(s), Florida Statutes (1985), states that the following constitutes grounds for disciplinary action: Failing to meet the minimum standards of performance in professional activities when measured against generally prevailing peer per...
...ol. The Department, the Board, and the Probable Cause Panel became bound by the determination of fact that Dr. Brown's testing of R.B.'s children was done as an act of friendship and not in a professional capacity, and that Dr. Brown did not violate section 490.009(2)(s) because a nexus between Dr....
Copy

Grabau v. Dept. of Health, Bd. of Psycho., 816 So. 2d 701 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2002 WL 649062

...ps. Eventually, a sexual relationship developed between the two and continued until December 1995, when K.R. discovered she was pregnant. Count One of the complaint alleged that by engaging in a sexual relationship with a client, Dr. Grabau violated section 490.009(2)(q) & .0111, Florida Statutes (1995), and rule 59AA-16.003(2) & (5)(a), Florida Administrative Code, which proscribe "sexual misconduct." Count Two alleged that Dr. Grabau violated section *703 490.009(2)(k), Florida Statutes (1995), by committing any act upon a patient or client that would constitute sexual battery or sexual misconduct as defined in section 490.0111, Florida Statutes. Count Three alleged that Dr. Grabau violated section 490.009(2)(s), Florida Statutes (1995), by failing to meet the minimum standards of performance in professional activities when measured against generally prevailing peer performance, including "the undertaking of activities for which the licensee is not qualified by training or experience." Dr....
...As a part of Conclusion of Law 19, the ALJ found: "The psychologist/client relationship, once established, is deemed to continue in perpetuity for the purposes of determining the existence of sexual misconduct." Additionally, the evidence presented by Department was found to constitute a violation of section 490.009(2)(k), Florida Statutes, which states as a ground for discipline a psychologist's commission of any act upon a patient or client that would constitute sexual battery or would constitute sexual misconduct, as defined in section 490.0111, Florida Statutes....
...The expert's testimony was not controverted by any credible evidence to the contrary. Accordingly, the ALJ concluded that clear and convincing evidence demonstrates that Dr. Grabau failed to meet acceptable minimum standards of practice, thereby raising a ground for discipline pursuant to section 490.009(2)(s), Florida Statutes....
Copy

William Kale, Ph.D. v. Dep't of Health, 175 So. 3d 815 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2015 WL 3516737

...inistrative Complaint against Dr. Kale, alleging that in June 2013, he was convicted in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida of two counts of health care fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1347, and thereby violated section 490.009(1)(w), Florida Statutes (2013), through a violation of section 456.072(1)(ii), Florida Statutes (2013)....
...nes would require specific findings of mitigation or aggravation. The Board entered a Final Order, wherein it adopted the allegations of fact and conclusions of law set forth in the Administrative Complaint; found that it was authorized by section 490.009(2) and/or section 456.072(2) to impose a penalty; and, accordingly, revoked Dr....
...The Board of Psychology shall adopt rules to implement the provisions of the chapter, and “[a]ll applicable provisions of chapter 456 relating to activities of regulatory boards shall apply to the board.” § 490.004(4)-(5), Fla. Stat. (2013). Section 490.009, Florida Statutes (2013), titled “Discipline,” provides: (1) The following acts constitute grounds for denial of a license or disciplinary action, as specified in s....
...In turn, Florida Administrative Code Rule 64B19-17.002 contains the Board’s disciplinary guidelines and provides: (1) When the Board finds that an applicant or a licensee has committed any of the acts set forth in Section 456.072(1) or 490.009(2), F.S., it shall issue a final order imposing one or more of the penalties listed in Section 456.072(2), F.S., as recommended in the following disciplinary guidelines. . . . The guidelines are presented as a range of penalties that may be imposed from minimum to maximum. For a violation of section 490.009(1)(w), the penalty range for a first offense is from reprimand and a $1,000 fine to revocation and a fine up to $10,000....
Copy

Iazzo v. Dept. of Prof'l Reg., 638 So. 2d 583 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1994 WL 267924

...Only one of the five issues raised on appeal merits discussion. We reverse and remand for a formal hearing. The Department of Professional Regulation (Department) filed an administrative complaint against Iazzo on March 3, 1992, alleging a violation of section 490.009(2)(s), Florida Statutes (1987)....
...ding that Iazzo's request for a formal hearing did not meet the requirements of section 120.57(1) or Florida Administrative Code Rule 28-5.201, [3] in that it did not specifically allege a factual dispute. Accordingly, the Board found Iazzo violated section 490.009(2)(s), as charged, placed him on two years of probation and ordered him to pay a $1,000 administrative fine....
...s are being determined by an agency. Id. Accordingly, we REVERSE and REMAND to the Board of Psychological Examiners with directions that it refer the case to DOAH for a formal evidentiary hearing. SMITH, BARFIELD and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur. NOTES [1] Section 490.009(2)(s) provides in relevant part: (2) The following acts of a licensee or applicant are grounds for which the disciplinary actions listed in subsection (1) may be taken: ........
...Philip Boswell, a licensed psychologist, to render an expert opinion as to whether entering into a business relationship with a patient prior to terminating that patient's psychotherapy fell below "minimum standards of performance in professional activities" referred to in § 490.009(2)(s)....
Copy

Shapiro v. State, Dep't of Prof'l Reg., Bd. of Psychological Examiners, 623 So. 2d 1235 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 9188, 1993 WL 349934

...out in a supplemental order and notice of intent to deny the application. The sole ground for denial remaining before the board was that the applicant had been reprimanded in North Carolina, and that a reprimand is an “action against” a license. Section 490.009(l)(a), Florida Statutes, the Psychological Services Act, authorizes the board to deny the application of an applicant whose license has been “acted against” in another state....
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1989).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

Robert A. Butterworth Attorney General (ls) 1 Section 490.009(1)(g), F.S. 2 See, Statement of Policy Concerning
Copy

Robert W. Otto v. City of Boca Raton, Florida (11th Cir. 2022).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

...For example, those licensed in clinical social work, marriage and family therapy, mental-health counseling, and psychological services may not “[f]ail[] to meet the minimum standards of performance in pro- fessional activities when measured against generally prevailing peer performance.” Fla. Stat. §§ 490.009(1)(r); 491.009(1)(r)....
...4 other words, licensed professionals must comply with the standard of care in their mental-healthcare practices. Historically, Florida has enforced these rules and others like them.12 So when it comes to talk therapy, under Fla. Stat. §§ 490.009(1)(r) and 491.009(1)(r), Florida has undertaken disciplinary actions against licensed practitioners whom the State concludes have failed to meet the substantive standard of care....
...2008-08922 (Department brought a complaint against a licensed psychologist that alleged she “fail[ed] to meet the mini- mum standards of performance in professional activities when measured against generally prevailing peer performance,” in viola- tion of Fla. Stat. § 490.009(1)(r), by, “[u]pon termination of services by [the] patient [], failing to remind [the] patient [] that she could find a replacement psychologist, therapist, or psychiatrist by con- sulting her insurer’s provider directory”)....

This Florida statute resource is curated by Graham W. Syfert, Esq., a Jacksonville, Florida personal injury and workers' compensation attorney. For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.