CopyCited 40 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida
...hat the evidence was insufficient as a matter of law to support a finding of guilt of culpable negligence and that the trial court erred in refusing to give appellant's requested jury instruction relating to execution of a left turn as prescribed by Section 316.122, Florida Statutes....
...p of five individuals had been driving a motor vehicle within the state while under the influence of alcoholic beverages. The remaining point for our consideration involves refusal of the trial court to instruct the jury concerning the provisions of Section 316.122, Florida Statutes, dealing with execution of a left turn by a motorist....
CopyCited 13 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 12 Fla. L. Weekly 388, 1987 Fla. LEXIS 2059
...Finally, the county argues that the directed verdict granted in its favor was proper because Blount's negligence was the sole proximate cause of the accident. In support of this position, the county claims that Blount's alleged violation of either section
316.122 (failing to yield the right-of-way on a left-hand turn) or
316.151(2) (making a left-hand turn from the right-hand lane) was a supervening act of negligence which the county could not have foreseen....
CopyCited 6 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1998 WL 476160
...'s verdict that he suffered no permanent injury causally connected to the automobile accident was against the manifest weight of the evidence; (3) whether the trial court erred in giving a jury instruction requested by defendant which was based upon section 316.122, Florida Statutes (1995); (4) whether the trial court abused its discretion in denying Pate's motion for new trial or additur because, Pate asserts, the jury's verdict that he was fifteen percent comparatively negligent was against th...
...use it was against the manifest weight of the evidence for the jury to find him fifteen percent comparatively negligent, and that the trial court induced this error by incorrectly instructing the jury. The trial court instructed the jury, based upon section 316.122, Florida Statutes (1995), that a motorist must "yield the right of way to any vehicle approaching from the opposite direction which is within the intersection or so close thereto as to constitute an immediate hazard." Pate failed to preserve for review the argument he now presents....
CopyCited 5 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2000 WL 121493
...turn. Thus, according to the defense's theory of the case, Gonzalez had the right of way and was legally entitled to complete his left turn. During the charge conference, the trial court granted the plaintiff's proposed jury instruction pursuant to section 316.122, Florida Statutes (1993) setting forth the obligation of a vehicle intending to turn left at an intersection....
...particular instructions will not be error."). Finally, as to the appellant's remaining minor points on appeal, we find them to be without merit and summarily affirm them as well. Affirmed. NOTES [1] That instruction read as follows: Florida Statutes 316.122 states as follows: The driver of a vehicle intending to turn to the left within an intersection or alley, private road, et cetera, shall yield the right-of-way to any vehicle approaching from the opposite direction which is within the intersection or so close thereto as to constitute an immediate hazard....
CopyPublished | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21152
appear to be a fair statement of the *724law.1 Section
316.122, Florida Statutes (1981), provides: The driver
CopyPublished | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 15273, 2014 WL 4852853
...mpala, killing Rachel May
Coulson.
The Florida Highway Patrol initially attributed the accident to Michelle
Ward and charged her non-criminally with violating Luis Luzardo’s right of way
by turning left in front of oncoming traffic under section 316.122 of the Florida
Statutes (2011)....
