Civil Citations under F.S. 316.075
Driver's license points · R = revocation · S = suspension§316.075(1)(a)1GREEN circular light, vehicle facing, failed to yield right-of-way while turning3 pts
§316.075(1)(a)1Failed to yield right-of-way to pedestrian3 pts
§316.075(1)(a)2GREEN Arrow, vehicle facing, proceeded straight through, failed to yield while turning3 pts
§316.075(1)(a)2Failed to yield right-of-way to pedestrian3 pts
§316.075(1)(a)3Green circular light, Pedestrian failed to cross within marked or unmarked crosswalk—
§316.075(1)(b)2Steady YELLOW traffic light, PEDESTRIAN facing, must not start to cross roadway—
§316.075(1)(c )1Steady RED light, vehicle facing, failed to yield while turning3 pts
§316.075(1)(c )1Fail to stop at STEADY RED signal before making right turn4 pts
§316.075(1)(c )1Red Light Camera - Fail to stop at STEADY RED light see 316.0083—
§316.075(1)(c)1aSteady RED light, vehicle facing, failed to yield to other traffic while making right turn3 pts
§316.075(1)(c )1aFail to stop at STEADY RED signal before making right turn4 pts
§316.075(1)(c )1aSteady RED light, vehicle facing, fail to yield to pedestrian while making right turn3 pts
§316.075(1)(c )1bSteady RED light, one way street, vehicle facing, fail to yield when making left turn3 pts
§316.075(1)(c )1bFail to stop at STEADY RED signal, one way street, before making left turn4 pts
§316.075(1)(c )1bSteady RED light, one way street, vehicle facing, fail to yield to pedestrian - left turn3 pts
§316.075(1)(c )2PEDESTRIAN facing, must not enter roadway on RED light—
§316.075(1)(c )2aSteady RED light, failed to yield to pedestrian3 pts
§316.075(1)(c)2bPEDESTRIAN facing, must not enter roadway on RED light—
§316.075(2)Erected OTHER THAN at intersection, vehicle facing, failed to obey3 pts
Notes of Decisions
Richard Masone v. City of Aventura, 147 So. 3d 492 (Fla. 2014).
· cites it 26× “Section 316.075 contains detailed rules governing the conduct of drivers and pedestrians relating to traffic control signal devices.”
City of Orlando v. Udowychenko, 98 So. 3d 589 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012).
· cites it 8× “12 Section 316.075, Florida Statutes (2011), requires adherence to traffic control signal devices by “drivers” of vehicles.”
State Ex Rel. City of Aventura v. Jimenez, 211 So. 3d 158 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016).
· cites it 4× “(2105) (requiring drivers to obey the instructions of any official traffic control device unless directed otherwise by a police officer); § 316.075(1), Fla. Stat. (2015) (requiring drivers generally to obey traffic control devices “exhibiting different colored lights”); § 316.”
City of Aventura v. Masone, 89 So. 3d 233 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011).
· cites it 6× “008 in arguing that chapter 316 expressly grants the City the authority to enact an ordinance to enforce and punish violations of section 316.075, Florida Statutes (2008).”
Gulley v. Pierce, 625 So. 2d 45 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993).
· cites it 2× “1235, the legislature clearly intended to include both traffic control signal devices, as referred to in section 316.075, i.e., those which alternately direct traffic to stop and permit it to proceed, as well as those provided in section 316.”
Pate v. Renfroe, 715 So. 2d 1094 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998).
· cites it 2× “, that it was an error of law to give the instruction because only section 316.075(1)(b), which expressly applies to a motorist turning left under a green arrow, should provide the standard for Pate's conduct.”
City of Oldsmar v. Trinh, 210 So. 3d 191 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016).
“Trinh for a violation of section 316.075(l)(c)(l) as a result of her vehicle’s “failure to stop at a red traffic signal.”
State v. Arrington, 95 So. 3d 324 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012).
· cites it 17× “Section 316.075, Florida Statutes (2010) is constitutional and does .”
Weeks v. Ranson, 419 So. 2d 722 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).
· cites it 5× “122) and it shall yield to oncoming traffic entering with the green light (section 316.075(l)(b)) even if the turn was begun with a green arrow.”
Hedergott v. Moon, 678 So. 2d 445 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996).
· cites it 4× “*446 The first issue involves the trial court’s granting of the Moons’ request to give a jury instruction based on section 316.075(l)(a), Florida Statutes (1989).”
Trice v. State, 755 So. 2d 808 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000).
· cites it 2× “Trice was cited for failing to obey a traffic device, section 316.075(3)(a), Florida Statutes (1997), and for careless driving, section 316.”
Walker v. State, 120 So. 3d 96 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013).
· cites it 2× “After the chase, Walker was cited for running a red light in violation of section 316.075, Florida Statutes, (2012).”
316.075(1): 1 case
State Ex Rel. City of Aventura v. Jimenez, 211 So. 3d 158 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016).
“(2105) (requiring drivers to obey the instructions of any official traffic control device unless directed otherwise by a police officer); § 316.075(1), Fla. Stat. (2015) (requiring drivers generally to obey traffic control devices “exhibiting different colored lights”); § 316.”
316.075(1)(b): 1 case
Pate v. Renfroe, 715 So. 2d 1094 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998).
“, that it was an error of law to give the instruction because only section 316.075(1)(b), which expressly applies to a motorist turning left under a green arrow, should provide the standard for Pate's conduct.”
316.075(1)(e): 1 case
State v. Arrington, 95 So. 3d 324 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012).
“Section 316.075, Florida Statutes (2010) is constitutional and does .”
316.075(3)(a): 1 case
Trice v. State, 755 So. 2d 808 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000).
“Trice was cited for failing to obey a traffic device, section 316.075(3)(a), Florida Statutes (1997), and for careless driving, section 316.”
316.075(4): 4 cases
Richard Masone v. City of Aventura, 147 So. 3d 492 (Fla. 2014).
“Section 316.075 contains detailed rules governing the conduct of drivers and pedestrians relating to traffic control signal devices.”
City of Orlando v. Udowychenko, 98 So. 3d 589 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012).
“12 Section 316.075, Florida Statutes (2011), requires adherence to traffic control signal devices by “drivers” of vehicles.”
City of Aventura v. Masone, 89 So. 3d 233 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011).
“008 in arguing that chapter 316 expressly grants the City the authority to enact an ordinance to enforce and punish violations of section 316.075, Florida Statutes (2008).”
State v. Arrington, 95 So. 3d 324 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012).
“Section 316.075, Florida Statutes (2010) is constitutional and does .”
316.075(l)(a): 2 cases
Hedergott v. Moon, 678 So. 2d 445 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996).
“*446 The first issue involves the trial court’s granting of the Moons’ request to give a jury instruction based on section 316.075(l)(a), Florida Statutes (1989).”
316.075(l)(b): 2 cases
Weeks v. Ranson, 419 So. 2d 722 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).
“122) and it shall yield to oncoming traffic entering with the green light (section 316.075(l)(b)) even if the turn was begun with a green arrow.”
316.075(l)(c): 4 cases
City of Orlando v. Udowychenko, 98 So. 3d 589 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012).
“12 Section 316.075, Florida Statutes (2011), requires adherence to traffic control signal devices by “drivers” of vehicles.”
Richard Masone v. City of Aventura, 147 So. 3d 492 (Fla. 2014).
“Section 316.075 contains detailed rules governing the conduct of drivers and pedestrians relating to traffic control signal devices.”
316.075(l)(c)(l): 1 case
City of Oldsmar v. Trinh, 210 So. 3d 191 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016).
“Trinh for a violation of section 316.075(l)(c)(l) as a result of her vehicle’s “failure to stop at a red traffic signal.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.