Florida/Georgia Personal Injury & Workers Compensation

You're probably overthinking it. Call a lawyer.

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 197.182 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 197.182 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 197.182 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 197.182

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XIV
TAXATION AND FINANCE
Chapter 197
TAX COLLECTIONS, SALES, AND LIENS
View Entire Chapter
197.182 Department of Revenue to pass upon and order refunds.
(1)(a) Except as provided in paragraphs (b), (c), and (d), the department shall pass upon and order refunds if payment of taxes assessed on the county tax rolls has been made voluntarily or involuntarily under any of the following circumstances:
1. An overpayment has been made.
2. A payment has been made when no tax was due.
3. A bona fide controversy exists between the tax collector and the taxpayer as to the liability of the taxpayer for the payment of the tax claimed to be due, the taxpayer pays the amount claimed by the tax collector to be due, and it is finally adjudged by a court of competent jurisdiction that the taxpayer was not liable for the payment of the tax or any part thereof.
4. A payment for a delinquent tax has been made in error by a taxpayer to the tax collector and within 12 months after the date of the erroneous payment and before any transfer of the assessed property to a third party for consideration, the party seeking a refund makes demand for reimbursement of the erroneous payment upon the owner of the property on which the taxes were erroneously paid and reimbursement of the erroneous payment is not received within 45 days after such demand. The demand for reimbursement must be sent by certified mail, return receipt requested, and a copy of the demand must be sent to the tax collector. If the payment was made in error by the taxpayer because of an error in the tax notice sent to the taxpayer, refund must be made as provided in paragraph (d).
5. A payment for a tax that has not become delinquent, has been made in error by a taxpayer to the tax collector and within 18 months after the date of the erroneous payment and before any transfer of the assessed property to a third party for consideration, the party seeking a refund makes a demand for reimbursement of the erroneous payment upon the owner of the property on which the taxes were erroneously paid, and reimbursement of the erroneous payment is not received within 45 days after such demand. The demand for reimbursement must be sent by certified mail, return receipt requested, and a copy of the demand must be sent to the tax collector. If the payment was made in error by the taxpayer because of an error in the tax notice sent to the taxpayer, refund must be made as provided in paragraph (d).
6. A payment is made for a tax certificate that is subsequently corrected or amended or is subsequently determined to be void under s. 197.443.
(b) Refunds that have been ordered by a court and refunds that do not result from changes made in the assessed value on a tax roll certified to the tax collector shall be made directly by the tax collector without order from the department and shall be made from undistributed funds without approval of the various taxing authorities.
(c) Overpayments in the amount of $10 or less may be retained by the tax collector unless a written claim for a refund is received from the taxpayer. Overpayments of more than $10 resulting from taxpayer error, if identified within the 4-year period of limitation, shall be automatically refunded to the taxpayer. Such refunds do not require approval from the department.
(d) If a payment has been made in error by a taxpayer because of an error in the tax notice sent to the taxpayer, refund must be made directly by the tax collector and does not require approval from the department. At the request of the taxpayer, the amount paid in error may be applied by the tax collector to the taxes for which the taxpayer is liable.
(e) Claims for refunds must be made pursuant to the rules of the department. A refund may not be granted unless a claim for the refund is made within 4 years after January 1 of the tax year for which the taxes were paid.
(f) Upon receipt of the department’s written denial of a refund, the tax collector shall issue the denial in writing to the taxpayer.
(g) If funds are available from current receipts subject to subsection (3) and a refund is approved, the taxpayer shall receive a refund within 100 days after a claim for refund is made, unless the tax collector, property appraiser, or department states good cause for remitting the refund after that date. The time periods stated in this paragraph and paragraphs (i) through (l) are directory and may be extended by a maximum of an additional 60 days if good cause is stated.
(h) If the taxpayer contacts the property appraiser first, the property appraiser shall refer the taxpayer to the tax collector.
(i) If a correction to the roll by the property appraiser is required as a condition for the refund, the tax collector shall, within 30 days, advise the property appraiser of the taxpayer’s application for a refund and forward the application to the property appraiser.
(j) The property appraiser has 30 days after receipt of the form from the tax collector to correct the roll if a correction is permissible by law. Within the 30-day period, the property appraiser shall advise the tax collector in writing of whether the roll has been corrected and state the reasons why the roll was corrected or not corrected.
(k) If the refund requires an order from the department, the tax collector shall forward the claim for refund to the department upon receipt of the correction from the property appraiser or 30 days after the claim for refund, whichever occurs first. This provision does not apply to corrections resulting in refunds of less than $2,500, which the tax collector shall make directly without order from the department from undistributed funds without approval of the various taxing authorities.
(l) The department shall approve or deny a claim for a refund within 30 days after receiving the claim from the tax collector, unless good cause is stated for delaying the approval or denial beyond that date.
(m) Subject to and after meeting the requirements of s. 194.171 and this section, an action to contest a denial of refund must be brought within 60 days after the date the tax collector sends the denial to the taxpayer. The tax collector may send notice of the denial electronically or by postal mail. Electronic transmission may be used only with the express consent of the property owner. If the notice of denial is sent electronically and is returned as undeliverable, a second notice must be sent. However, the original electronic transmission is the official mailing for the purpose of this section.
(n) In computing any time period under this section, if the last day of the period is a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday, the period is extended to the next working day.
(2) If the department orders a refund, the department shall forward a copy of its order to the tax collector who shall determine the pro rata share due by each taxing authority. The tax collector shall make the refund from undistributed funds held for that taxing authority and shall identify such refund as a reduction in the next distribution. If the undistributed funds are not sufficient for the refund, the tax collector shall notify the taxing authority of the shortfall. The taxing authority shall:
(a) Authorize the tax collector to make refund and forward to the tax collector its pro rata share of the refund from currently budgeted funds, if available; or
(b) Notify the tax collector that the taxing authority does not have funds currently available and provide for the payment of the refund in its budget for the next year.
(3) A refund ordered by the department pursuant to this section shall be made by the tax collector in one aggregate amount composed of all the pro rata shares of the several taxing authorities concerned, except that a partial refund is allowed if one or more of the taxing authorities concerned do not have funds currently available to pay their pro rata shares of the refund and this would cause an unreasonable delay in the total refund. A statement by the tax collector explaining the refund shall accompany the refund payment. If taxes become delinquent as a result of a refund pursuant to subparagraph (1)(a)5. or paragraph (1)(d), the tax collector shall notify the property owner that the taxes have become delinquent and that a tax certificate will be sold if the taxes are not paid within 30 days after the date of delinquency.
(4) Nothing contained in this section shall be construed to authorize any taxing authority to make any tax levy in excess of the maximum authorized by the constitution or the laws of this state.
History.s. 136, ch. 85-342; ss. 3, 7, ch. 91-295; s. 3, ch. 98-139; ss. 1, 11, ch. 2000-312; s. 6, ch. 2002-18; s. 1, ch. 2005-96; s. 8, ch. 2011-151.

F.S. 197.182 on Google Scholar

F.S. 197.182 on CourtListener

Amendments to 197.182


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 197.182

Total Results: 13  |  Sort by: Relevance  |  Newest First

Copy

Ward v. Brown, 894 So. 2d 811 (Fla. 2004).

Cited 12 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 2004 WL 2360129

...Errors in classification of property. Fla. Admin. Code R. 12D-8.021. It is true that in some cases involving errors in classification listed under rule 12D-8.021, district courts have applied the four-year statute of limitations to the bringing of an action, pursuant to section 197.182(1)(c), Florida Statutes (2001)....
...lorida Statutes (1993), and that the taxpayer's challenge "was filed as a means to correct the County's error in failing to classify his property." Id. at 1141. The Fifth District found in Sartori that the four-year statute of limitation provided in section 197.182, Florida Statutes (1995), applied in that case, and that the sixty-day time limit in section 194.171, did not apply....
Copy

State, Dept. of Revenue v. Stafford, 646 So. 2d 803 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994).

Cited 9 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 1994 WL 685951

...We grant the petition for writ of prohibition because respondent FDIC did not comply with the jurisdictional requirements of section 194.171, Florida Statutes (1993), governing challenges to property tax assessments. We reject respondent FDIC's contention that section 197.182, Florida Statutes (1993), governing administrative refunds with its four-year statute of limitation, rather than section 194.171, with its sixty-day jurisdictional limitation, can be used as a vehicle by which a subsequent property ow...
...e filed at any time. Recognizing the clear and strict limitations of subsection 194.171(2), respondent FDIC has attempted to circumvent those limitations by couching its complaint as an action for a refund, which it asserts falls within the scope of section 197.182....
...risdictional time period expired. Section 194.181, Florida Statutes (1993) requires that in any action contesting the assessment of any property, the "county property appraiser shall be a party defendant." If we were to allow a cause of action under section 197.182 in this case, the court would be placed in a position of determining the validity of an assessment made by the Broward County Property Appraiser without the property appraiser as a party to the proceedings....
...Without reaching the question of whether the property appraiser would be an indispensable party to an action contesting valuation decisions made by his office, we find that the allegations of the second amended complaint fall clearly within the scope of section 194.171 and not the scope of 197.182....
...o the courts. See Bystrom v. Diaz, 514 So.2d 1072 (Fla. 1987); Rudisill v. City of Tampa, 151 Fla. 284, 9 So.2d 380 (Fla. 1942). We are advised that this is a case of first impression. No appellate case has discussed the possibility that by invoking section 197.182, a litigant could successfully circumvent the clear and strict jurisdictional requirements of section 194.171. Respondent contends that the two statutes provide alternative forms of relief to taxpayers — section 194.171 to apply when a taxpayer attacks the assessment without payment of the taxes and section 197.182 to apply when payment in full has been made. Respondent FDIC urges us to read the two statutes in pari materia and construe section 197.182 to apply when the taxes have been paid in full and a refund is then sought based on an attack on the valuation. To do this, we would be required to disregard the plain language of both statutes, including the strict jurisdictional time limits and other statutorily-imposed limitations to an action contesting the amount of an assessment. We do not find section 197.182 to be applicable to an action challenging the basis for an assessment. By its own language, the section governs disputes involving "collections" of taxes, not "assessments" and is found in the chapter on tax collections, sales and liens. While section 194.171 provides the vehicle for challenging assessments, section 197.182, upon which respondent FDIC relies, is a complete administrative procedure for applying for refunds or cancellations through the Department of Revenue under certain circumstances....
...as due; when the taxpayer was not liable for the payment of the tax; when a payment has been made in error; or when a payment has been made for tax certificates that are subsequently corrected or are subsequently determined to be void. See, e.g., subsection 197.182(1)(a)(1)-(5). None of the statutory provisions contemplate an attack on the judgment of the property appraiser based on the amount of the assessment as grounds for a refund. See Op.Att'y Gen.Fla. 091-31 (1991). Respondent FDIC suggests that subsection 197.182(1)(a)(1), which provides for refunds when an "overpayment" has been made, applies....
...esting tax assessments, by providing an alternative mechanism to attack assessments up to four years after the fact as long as the amount of the delinquent taxes were first paid — disregarding the time of payment. By claiming an "overpayment" under section 197.182, respondent FDIC is, in effect, conceding that some amount of the tax was admittedly owed....
...ts would be violated because during the years that the assessment was made, it did not possess, have an interest in, or hold title to the property. No case authority is offered in support of this position. Despite respondent FDIC's attempt to invoke section 197.182 as a jurisdictional basis for relief, we agree with petitioners that it would be illogical and unreasonable to have two such disparate periods of limitations (sixty days in section 194.171 and four years in section 197.182) and disparate requirements concerning payment of taxes applicable to the same cause of action — a property appraiser's valuation decision....
Copy

Davis v. MacEdonia Hous. Auth., 641 So. 2d 131 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994).

Cited 7 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1994 WL 284111

...ure and Historical Development," in Fla. State and Local Taxes, Vol. II, § 8.02[4], at 355 (The Florida Bar 1988). "No refund shall be granted unless claim is made therefor within 4 years of January 1 of the tax year for which the taxes were paid." § 197.182(1)(c), Fla. Stat. (1993). "[T]he statute should be construed as contemplating that Florida ad valorem taxpayers have a right to sue for a refund within the four-year limitation period defined in § 197.182(1)(c)....
...1 Fla.Tax Serv.2d (MB) III-429, § 3.161 (1990). *135 Macedonia Housing Authority is seeking "refunds ... ordered by a court and ... refunds which do not result from changes made in the assessed value on a tax roll certificate to the tax collector." § 197.182(1)(b), Fla....
Copy

State, Dept., Revenue v. Gerald Sohn, 654 So. 2d 249 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1995 WL 238763

...The Fourth District Court of Appeal's opinion in Department of Revenue v. Stafford, 646 So.2d 803 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994), relied on by the Department is inapposite. That case holds that an action for a refund is limited to those circumstances set forth in section 197.182, Florida Statutes, and it cannot be used as a subterfuge to revisit the assessment....
...ction... . *251 Rule 12D-13.006 implements various statutes, including those authorizing corrections of errors of omission or commission "at any time" (section 197.122); corrections of tax certificates (section 197.443); and applications for refund (section 197.182)....
Copy

In Re Polygraphex Sys., Inc., 275 B.R. 408 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2002).

Cited 4 times | Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | 48 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 96, 15 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 123, 2002 Bankr. LEXIS 241, 39 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 68

...[11] Even if some funds were due the Debtor, the money would not come from the state. While it is true that the DOR "shall pass upon and order refunds," the refunds ordered by the court — which do not result in changes in the assessed value on a tax roll — come directly from the tax collector. Fla.Stat. § 197.182(1)(b)1. Similarly, when a payment is made in error because of an error in the tax notice, "the refund must be made directly by the tax collector and does not require approval from the department." Fla.Stat. § 197.182(1)(b)2....
...ity by the tax collector," (2) make payments from currently budgeted funds, if available, or (3) notify the tax collector that it cannot currently make the payments and provide for the payment of the refund in its budget for the next year. Fla.Stat. § 197.182(2)(b)....
Copy

Sartori v. Dep't of Revenue, 714 So. 2d 1136 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1998 WL 396717

...Sartori instituted suit requesting that the trial court enter an order directing DOR to refund ad valorem taxes which Sartori had paid on pollution control equipment located on his dairy farm. We reverse because Sartori filed the instant action within the applicable four-year statute of limitations provided in section 197.182(1)(c), Florida Statutes (1995)....
...pital improvement which could be taxed at fair market value, and that the County should have classified the equipment as a "special class of property" under section 193.621 which is subject to be taxed at salvage value. He further argues that, under section 197.182, Florida Statutes (1995), and rule 12D-8.021 of the Florida Administrative Code, he had four years within which to institute his lawsuit seeking a refund. Section 197.182, Florida Statutes (1995), in relevant part, provides: 197.182 Department of Revenue to pass upon and order refunds.- (1) (a) Except as provided in paragraph (b), the department shall pass upon and order refunds when payment of taxes assessed on the county tax rolls has been made voluntarily or involuntarily under any of the following circumstances: 1 ....
...The fourth district concluded the trial court lacked jurisdiction over the lawsuit because FDIC had failed to file its complaint within the sixty-day time period set forth in *1140 section 197.171. Id. at 806. The court rejected the argument that the four-year statute of limitations set forth in section 197.182 governed the case, explaining that, although the lawsuit stated a cause of action for a refund, the request for the refund was based on [FDIC's] assertion that the assessments for the years 1990 through 1992 were `unjust, capricious,...
...Accordingly, we reject this argument as meritless. In summary, since Sartori's lawsuit was filed as a means to correct the County's error in failing to classify his property as pollution control equipment, the four year statute of limitation provided in section 197.182, Florida Statutes (1995), applies....
Copy

Hidden Bay Master Ass'n, Inc. v. Miami-Dade Cnty. Dep't of Prop. Appraisal, 938 So. 2d 599 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2006 WL 2741632

...Hidden Bay argues that, since this error resulted in the overpayment of taxes, it is subject to correction at any time pursuant to section 12D-8.021, Florida Administrative Code, or alternatively, within four (4) years of the tax year for which the taxes were paid pursuant to section 197.182, Florida Statutes (2001)....
...y to each unit. Since the property at issue was still owned by Hidden Bay's Developer in 2001 and 2002, we cannot find that the property appraiser misjudged the value or classification of the property. Therefore, we will not permit Hidden Bay to use section 197.182 and the Florida Administrative Code "to circumvent [their] failure to properly and timely challenge the tax assessment of their properties as required by section 194.171(2)." Ward, 894 So....
...193.122(2). . . . . . . (6) The requirements of subsections (2), (3), and (5) are jurisdictional. No court shall have jurisdiction in such cases until after the requirements of both sections (2) and (3) have been met. § 194.171, Fla. Stat. (2001). [4] Section 197.182(1)(c), Florida Statutes, states, in relevant part, "[c]laims for refunds shall be made in accordance with the rules of the department....
Copy

Olde Florida Investments, Ltd. v. Port of the Islands Cmty. Improvement Dist. (In Re Olde Florida Investments, Ltd.), 293 B.R. 531 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2003).

Cited 2 times | Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | 16 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 137, 50 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1274, 2003 Bankr. LEXIS 526, 2003 WL 21289984

...valorem assessments. Lastly, the Tax Collector contends on behalf of the Tax Certificate Holders that while there is a four-year statute of limitations for correction or voiding tax certificates and for making a refund claim, pursuant to Fla. Stat. § 197.182(1)(c), exceptions contained in Fla....
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1991).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

approve refunds of ad valorem taxes pursuant to section 197.182, Florida Statutes, when the property appraiser
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 2010).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

refunds must be processed in accordance with section 197.182, Florida Statutes, and that interest is to
Copy

Dep't of Revenue v. Pepperidge Farm, Inc., 847 So. 2d 575 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2003 WL 21394197

*577that it had four years to seek a refund under section 197.182(l)(e), Florida Statutes (1997). We agree with
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 2000).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

cause." 7 Section 197.182(1)(a), Fla. Stat. 8 Section 197.182(1)(b)1., Fla. Stat 9 Section 197.182(1)(b)2
Copy

Todora v. Silverstein, 889 So. 2d 177 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 19097, 2004 WL 2895610

four-year statute of limitations, pursuant to section 197.182, Florida Statutes (2002). We are inclined to

This Florida statute resource is curated by Graham W. Syfert, Esq., a Jacksonville, Florida personal injury and workers' compensation attorney. For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.