Cases from cite.case.law:

WILSON, Sr. v. STATE, 202 So. 3d 135 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . administer oaths; (b) Under oath or affirmation taken or administered by an officer authorized under s. 117.10 . . .

STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY, v. R. BROWN,, 179 So. 3d 547 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . Furthermore, section 117.10, Florida Statutes (2014), which delineates the abilities of officers to administer . . .

EH, a MOORE HH, a W. v. CITY OF MIRAMAR, a, 111 F. Supp. 3d 1307 (S.D. Fla. 2015)

. . . The undersigned finds that these witnesses were sworn prior to giving their statements. 117.10 Fla. . . .

BRYANT, Jr. v. MOSTERT,, 636 F. Supp. 2d 1303 (M.D. Fla. 2009)

. . . . § 117.10, Fla. Stat. In the instant case, Plaintiff has not demonstrated that Defendant R.W. . . .

GUPTON, v. DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY,, 987 So. 2d 737 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . Gupton acknowledges that like a notary public, section 117.10, Florida Statutes, authorizes law enforcement . . .

M. LEVINE, J v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION,, 407 F.3d 178 (3d Cir. 2005)

. . . 352(c); (2) received trade executions while not in the trading crowd in violation of Exchange Rule 117.10 . . .

SMITH, v. STATE, 861 So. 2d 1292 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . states that it was sworn and subscribed by an Orange County Corrections officer pursuant to section 117.10 . . .

SOO LINE RAILROAD COMPANY, d b a a v. CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS W., 38 F. Supp. 2d 1096 (D. Minn. 1998)

. . . to the Minneapolis Department of Inspections for five demolition permits as required under Section 117.10 . . .

STATE OF FLORIDA v. COLE, 41 Fla. Supp. 2d 15 (Fla. Cir. Ct. 1990)

. . . Section 117.10 provides that law enforcement officers are notaries public for the purpose of attesting . . .

STATE OF FLORIDA v. COLE, 41 Fla. Supp. 2d 13 (Fla. Cir. Ct. 1990)

. . . S. 117.10) Signature of attesting officer TITLE DATE Trooper Segalla, should the matters contain in the . . .

STATE v. JOHNSTON,, 553 So. 2d 730 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . Directly below the signature line is the statement, “THIS AFFIDAVIT MUST BE NOTARIZED OR ATTESTED TO (F.S. 117.10 . . .

STATE OF FLORIDA v. REED, 39 Fla. Supp. 2d 67 (Fla. Cir. Ct. 1989)

. . . following: Signature of law enforcement officer THIS AFFIDAVIT MUST BE NOTARIZED OR ATTESTED TO (F.S. 117.10 . . . Section 117.10 F.S. provides that law enforcement officers are notaries public for the purpose of attesting . . .

ALLIED FIDELITY INSURANCE COMPANY, v. CONTINENTAL ILLINOIS NATIONAL BANK AND TRUST COMPANY OF CHICAGO,, 677 F. Supp. 562 (N.D. Ill. 1988)

. . . Weintraub & Resnick, Bankruptcy Law Manual 117.10[3] (Rev. ed.) . . .

FORRY, INC. v. NEUNDORFER, INC., 837 F.2d 259 (6th Cir. 1988)

. . . Nimmer, supra, 117.10[A][1] at 7-53 to -54 (footnote omitted). . . .

In GRAND JURY PROCEEDINGS MILLS. UNITED STATES In GRAND JURY PROCEEDINGS MILLS. MILLS, 686 F.2d 135 (3d Cir. 1982)

. . . Fed.R.Crim.P. 17(g); 8 Moore’s Federal Practice, 117.10-11. . . .

In GYPSUM CASES, 386 F. Supp. 959 (N.D. Cal. 1974)

. . . Settlement approval 162.00 117.10 13.90 13.20 9. . . .

UNITED STATES v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, 229 F. Supp. 925 (S.D. Miss. 1964)

. . . 1956-1957 1960-1961 White $8.20 $40.42 $31.23 $78.70 $128.50 $173.42 Negro 2.67 7.45 6.69 23.83 78.70 117.10 . . .

TIDMORE, v. J. C. TAYLOR,, 323 F.2d 88 (10th Cir. 1963)

. . . authorized depository for mail, which letter contained a United States Treasury check in the amount of $117.10 . . . endorsement of the payee, Alice Wofford, on said check for the purpose of obtaining from the United States $117.10 . . .

HOME INS. CO. OF NEW YORK v. WILLIAMS, 237 F. 171 (5th Cir. 1916)

. . . . $117.10 Nov. 11th. By check....................................$50.00 Dec. 15th. . . .

UNITED STATES v. RAMSEY, 158 F. 488 (C.C.D. Idaho 1907)

. . . The clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendants for $117.10 . . .

THE B RENG RE, 155 F. 439 (D. Or. 1907)

. . . Giulio, supra) ; and also, I think, commission on sale of the steel, $68.75 — making a total added of $117.10 . . .

THE OCEANICA, 156 F. 306 (W.D.N.Y. 1907)

. . . The allowance of the item for measuring and tallying 780,714 feet of lumber at $117.10 is sustained ( . . .

HOGUE v. NORTHWESTERN MUT. LIFE INS. CO., 114 F. 778 (C.C.N.D. Ga. 1902)

. . . 1872, 1873, and 1874; said dividends so earned being as follows: 187.1, $160.90; 1872, $92.10; 1873, $117.10 . . .