The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . Sections 117.01, 117.04, 117.045, 117.05, and 117.103 do not apply to the provisions of this section. . . . the attestor had been a notary public, the notary’s seal would have been affixed to the document. § 117.05 . . .
. . . D.C.Code § 5-117.05. . . .
. . . Nothing in the text of section 117.05, Florida Statutes (2013), imposes a requirement that the notarization . . .
. . . . § 117.05(4). . . . Id. § 117.05(5). . . . .
. . . . § 117.05(4). . . . Id. § 117.05(5). . . . .
. . . . § 117.05(1) (2004). . . . Stat. § 117.05(4)(g) (2004). . . .
. . . Chapter 117.05(A)(7).) . . . The Ordinance also sets forth a license fee of $7,500.00 per year for an adult establishment (Chapter 117.05 . . . (Chapter 117.05(G).) The Complaint was filed here on March 4, 2010. (Doc. No. 1.) . . .
. . . to determine whether the petitioners’ Amended Verified Petition for Adoption complies with section 117.05 . . . also found that the verification and acknowledgment of A.L.’s signature did not comply with section 117.05 . . . .’s signature and two affidavits from individuals purporting to satisfy the requirements of section 117.05 . . .
. . . . § 117.05(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (2007). . . .
. . . seeks to hold defendant civilly liable for false reporting of a crime in violation of D.C.Code § 5-117.05 . . .
. . . . §§ 117.05(4) & (13). . . .
. . . applied under the operating loan rate method as 152.11 percent for 1992, 133.80 percent for 1993, and 117.05 . . .
. . . . § 5-117.05 (false or fictitious report regarding commission of crime made knowingly punishable by fine . . .
. . . . § 5-117.05 (false or fictitious report regarding commission of crime made knowingly punishable by fine . . .
. . . . §§ 117.01(1), 117.05. . . .
. . . Section 117.05(6)(a), Florida Statutes (1995), provides that a notary public may not notarize a signature . . .
. . . within the scope of her employment when she executed the faulty notarizations, as is required by section 117.05 . . . GOSHORN and GRIFFIN, JJ, concur. . § 117.05, Fla. Stat. (Supp.1992). . . . .
. . . Ameriseal’s claims against Kathleen and the law firm were based on section 117.05, which provides for . . . Section 117.05(6) provides that a notary may not notarize a signature on a document if the person whose . . . Section 117.05(7) provides for liability on the part of the notary’s employer: The employer of a notary . . . The Legislature limits the fees of notaries to $10.00 (except for performing marriages). § 117.05(2), . . . . § 117.05(6)(a), Fla.Stat. (1993). . . . Section 117.05(5) provides: A notary public may not notarize a signature on a document unless he or she . . . Section 117.05(7): The employer of a notary public shall be liable to the persons involved for all damages . . .
. . . See, e.g., § 117.05(16)(a), Fla. Stat. . . . See, also, % 117.05(16)(b)-(c).) . . .
. . . [t]he document is incomplete_” Fla.Stat. ch. 117.05(6)(b). . . .
. . . because the notary section of the motion did not comport with the technical requirements of section 117.05 . . .
. . . specially designated notaries while in the performance of official duties and sections 117.03 through 117.05 . . .
. . . Id. 117.05[2][d], at 7-27. . . .
. . . This matter is also here pursuant to 117.05(b) of the Plan, which provides that a “PL Claim shall become . . . In order to secure payment of their expected judgments, the class of tort claimants agreed in 117.05( . . . The Bursches ask this Court to disregard the plain language of 117.05(b) and interpret this provision . . . was not that Pettibone would be affected by the inclusion of post-judgment interest, but that Plan 117.05 . . . Plan provision 117.05(b) is clear by its terms. . . .
. . . Cir.1977); In re Gladding Corp., 20 B.R. 566, 568 (Bankr.D.Mass.1982); see 8 Collier on Bankruptcy 117.05 . . .
. . . This matter is also here pursuant to 117.05(b) of the Plan which provides that a “PL Claim shall become . . . In order to secure payment of their expected judgments, the class of tort claimants agreed in 117.05( . . . However, the prohibition of interest in Plan 117.05(b) did not preclude prejudgment interest because . . . In other words, 117.05(b) cuts off post-judgment interest only. . . . This is one of the reasons that 117.05(b) prohibits the inclusion of post-judgment interest from Class . . .
. . . See Federal Income Taxation of Corporations and Shareholders, 117.05(6) (5th Ed.1987). . . .
. . . language is intended to reduce the reluctance of courts to impose sanctions, see Moore, Federal Practice 117.05 . . .
. . . Rule 48(a) to nolle the original pleading.” 8 Moore’s Federal Practice — Rules of Criminal Procedure 117.05 . . .
. . . section 6B1.2(a) of the guidelines. .The guideline range is arrived at as follows: Base level offense 32 (117.05 . . .
. . . See also, Weintraub & Resnick, Bankruptcy Law Manual 117.05[6] (1980); Gropper v. . . .
. . . language is intended to reduce the reluctance of courts to impose sanctions, see Moore, Federal Practice 117.05 . . .
. . . Corporations and Shareholders (3d ed.), 117.05, p. 7-24. . . .
. . . 1959), cert. denied, 361 U.S. 962, 80 S.Ct. 591, 4 L.Ed.2d 544 (1960); 3A Moore’s Federal Practice, 117.05 . . .
. . . 6.26 (M) 4.44 (S) 1972-73 53.31 (S) 69.70 (M) 123.01 4.65 (S) 6.00 (M) 1973-74 70.73 (M) 46.32 (S) 117.05 . . .
. . . Ingram incurred as proper items of expense $117.05 for hospitalization, $251 for medical care and $800 . . .