Florida/Georgia Personal Injury & Workers Compensation

You're probably overthinking it. Call a lawyer.

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 102.141 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 102.141 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 102.141 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 102.141

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title IX
ELECTORS AND ELECTIONS
Chapter 102
CONDUCTING ELECTIONS AND ASCERTAINING THE RESULTS
View Entire Chapter
102.141 County canvassing board; duties.
(1) The county canvassing board shall be composed of the supervisor of elections; a county court judge, who shall act as chair; and the chair of the board of county commissioners. The names of the canvassing board members must be published on the supervisor’s website upon completion of the logic and accuracy test. At least two alternate canvassing board members must be appointed pursuant to paragraph (e). In the event any member of the county canvassing board is unable to serve, is a candidate who has opposition in the election being canvassed, or is an active participant in the campaign or candidacy of any candidate who has opposition in the election being canvassed, such member shall be replaced as follows:
(a) If a county court judge is unable to serve or if all are disqualified, the chief judge of the judicial circuit in which the county is located must appoint as a substitute member a qualified elector of the county who is not a candidate with opposition in the election being canvassed and who is not an active participant in the campaign or candidacy of any candidate with opposition in the election being canvassed. In such event, the members of the county canvassing board shall meet and elect a chair.
(b) If the supervisor of elections is unable to serve or is disqualified, the chair of the board of county commissioners must appoint as a substitute member a member of the board of county commissioners who is not a candidate with opposition in the election being canvassed and who is not an active participant in the campaign or candidacy of any candidate with opposition in the election being canvassed. The supervisor, however, shall act in an advisory capacity to the canvassing board.
(c) If the chair of the board of county commissioners is unable to serve or is disqualified, the board of county commissioners must appoint as a substitute member one of its members who is not a candidate with opposition in the election being canvassed and who is not an active participant in the campaign or candidacy of any candidate with opposition in the election being canvassed.
(d) If a substitute member or alternate member cannot be appointed as provided elsewhere in this subsection, or in the event of a vacancy in such office, the chief judge of the judicial circuit in which the county is located must appoint as a substitute member or alternate member a qualified elector of the county who is not a candidate with opposition in the election being canvassed and who is not an active participant in the campaign or candidacy of any candidate with opposition in the election being canvassed.
(e)1. The chief judge of the judicial circuit in which the county is located shall appoint a county court judge as an alternate member of the county canvassing board or, if each county court judge is unable to serve or is disqualified, shall appoint an alternate member who is qualified to serve as a substitute member under paragraph (a). Any alternate may serve in any seat.
2. The chair of the board of county commissioners shall appoint a member of the board of county commissioners as an alternate member of the county canvassing board or, if each member of the board of county commissioners is unable to serve or is disqualified, shall appoint an alternate member who is qualified to serve as a substitute member under paragraph (d).
3. If a member of the county canvassing board is unable to participate in a meeting of the board, the chair of the county canvassing board or his or her designee must designate which alternate member will serve as a member of the board in the place of the member who is unable to participate at that meeting.
4. If not serving as one of the three members of the county canvassing board, an alternate member may be present, observe, and communicate with the three members constituting the county canvassing board, but may not vote in the board’s decisions or determinations.
(2)(a) The county canvassing board shall meet in a building accessible to the public in the county where the election occurred at a time and place to be designated by the supervisor to publicly canvass the absent electors’ ballots as provided for in s. 101.68 and provisional ballots as provided by ss. 101.048, 101.049, and 101.6925. During each meeting of the county canvassing board, each political party and each candidate may have one watcher able to view directly or on a display screen ballots being examined for signature matching and other processes. Provisional ballots cast pursuant to s. 101.049 shall be canvassed in a manner that votes for candidates and issues on those ballots can be segregated from other votes. As soon as the absent electors’ ballots and the provisional ballots are canvassed, the board shall proceed to publicly canvass the vote given each candidate, nominee, constitutional amendment, or other measure submitted to the electorate of the county, as shown by the returns then on file in the office of the supervisor.
(b) Public notice of the canvassing board members, alternates, time, and place at which the county canvassing board shall meet to canvass the absent electors’ ballots and provisional ballots must be given at least 48 hours prior thereto by publication on the county’s website as provided in s. 50.0311, on the supervisor’s website, or in one or more newspapers of general circulation in the county. If the applicable website becomes unavailable or there is no newspaper of general circulation in the county, the notice must be posted in at least four conspicuous places in the county. The time given in the notice as to the convening of the meeting of the county canvassing board must be specific and may not be a time period during which the board may meet.
(c) If the county canvassing board suspends or recesses a meeting publicly noticed pursuant to paragraph (b) for a period lasting more than 60 minutes, the board must post on the supervisor’s website the anticipated time at which the board expects to reconvene. If the county canvassing board does not reconvene at the specified time, the board must provide at least 2 hours’ notice, which must be posted on the supervisor’s website, before reconvening.
(d) During any meeting of the county canvassing board, a physical notice must be placed in a conspicuous area near the public entrance to the building in which the meeting is taking place. The physical notice must include the names of the individuals officially serving as the county canvassing board, the names of any alternate members, the time of the meeting, and a brief statement as to the anticipated activities of the county canvassing board.
(3) The canvass, except the canvass of absent electors’ returns and the canvass of provisional ballots, shall be made from the returns and certificates of the inspectors as signed and filed by them with the supervisor, and the county canvassing board shall not change the number of votes cast for a candidate, nominee, constitutional amendment, or other measure submitted to the electorate of the county, respectively, in any polling place, as shown by the returns. All returns shall be made to the board on or before 2 a.m. of the day following any primary, general, or other election. If the returns from any precinct are missing, if there are any omissions on the returns from any precinct, or if there is an obvious error on any such returns, the canvassing board shall order a retabulation of the returns from such precinct. Before canvassing such returns, the canvassing board shall examine the tabulation of the ballots cast in such precinct and determine whether the returns correctly reflect the votes cast. If there is a discrepancy between the returns and the tabulation of the ballots cast, the tabulation of the ballots cast shall be presumed correct and such votes shall be canvassed accordingly.
(4)(a) The supervisor of elections shall upload into the county’s election management system by 7 p.m. on the day before the election the results of all early voting and vote-by-mail ballots that have been canvassed and tabulated by the end of the early voting period. Pursuant to ss. 101.5614(8), 101.657, and 101.68(2), the tabulation of votes cast or the results of such uploads may not be made public before the close of the polls on election day.
(b) The canvassing board shall report all early voting and all tabulated vote-by-mail results to the Department of State within 30 minutes after the polls close. Thereafter, the canvassing board shall report, with the exception of provisional ballot results, updated precinct election results to the department at least every 45 minutes until all results are completely reported. The supervisor of elections shall notify the department immediately of any circumstances that do not permit periodic updates as required. Results shall be submitted in a format prescribed by the department.
(5) The canvassing board shall submit on forms or in formats provided by the division unofficial returns to the Department of State for each federal, statewide, state, or multicounty office or ballot measure no later than noon on the third day after any primary election and no later than noon on the fourth day after any general or other election. Such returns shall include the canvass of all ballots as required by subsection (2).
(6) If the county canvassing board determines that the unofficial returns may contain a counting error in which the vote tabulation system failed to count votes that were properly marked in accordance with the instructions on the ballot, the county canvassing board shall:
(a) Correct the error and retabulate the affected ballots with the vote tabulation system; or
(b) Request that the Department of State verify the tabulation software. When the Department of State verifies such software, the department shall compare the software used to tabulate the votes with the software filed with the department pursuant to s. 101.5607 and check the election parameters.
(7) If the unofficial returns reflect that a candidate for any office was defeated or eliminated by one-half of a percent or less of the votes cast for such office, that a candidate for retention to a judicial office was retained or not retained by one-half of a percent or less of the votes cast on the question of retention, or that a measure appearing on the ballot was approved or rejected by one-half of a percent or less of the votes cast on such measure, a recount shall be ordered of the votes cast with respect to such office or measure. The Secretary of State is responsible for ordering recounts in federal, state, and multicounty races. The county canvassing board or the local board responsible for certifying the election is responsible for ordering recounts in all other races. A recount need not be ordered with respect to the returns for any office, however, if the candidate or candidates defeated or eliminated from contention for such office by one-half of a percent or less of the votes cast for such office request in writing that a recount not be made.
(a) Each canvassing board responsible for conducting a recount shall put each marksense ballot through automatic tabulating equipment and determine whether the returns correctly reflect the votes cast. If any marksense ballot is physically damaged so that it cannot be properly counted by the automatic tabulating equipment during the recount, a true duplicate shall be made of the damaged ballot pursuant to the procedures in s. 101.5614(4). Immediately before the start of the recount, a test of the tabulating equipment shall be conducted as provided in s. 101.5612. If the test indicates no error, the recount tabulation of the ballots cast shall be presumed correct and such votes shall be canvassed accordingly. If an error is detected, the cause therefor shall be ascertained and corrected and the recount repeated, as necessary. The canvassing board shall immediately report the error, along with the cause of the error and the corrective measures being taken, to the Department of State. No later than 11 days after the election, the canvassing board shall file a separate incident report with the Department of State, detailing the resolution of the matter and identifying any measures that will avoid a future recurrence of the error. If the automatic tabulating equipment used in a recount is not part of the voting system and the ballots have already been processed through such equipment, the canvassing board is not required to put each ballot through any automatic tabulating equipment again.
(b) Each canvassing board responsible for conducting a recount where touchscreen ballots were used shall examine the counters on the precinct tabulators to ensure that the total of the returns on the precinct tabulators equals the overall election return. If there is a discrepancy between the overall election return and the counters of the precinct tabulators, the counters of the precinct tabulators shall be presumed correct and such votes shall be canvassed accordingly.
(c) The canvassing board shall submit on forms or in formats provided by the division a second set of unofficial returns to the Department of State for each federal, statewide, state, or multicounty office or ballot measure. The returns shall be filed no later than 3 p.m. on the 5th day after any primary election and no later than 3 p.m. on the 9th day after any general election in which a recount was ordered by the Secretary of State. If the canvassing board is unable to complete the recount prescribed in this subsection by the deadline, the second set of unofficial returns submitted by the canvassing board shall be identical to the initial unofficial returns and the submission shall also include a detailed explanation of why it was unable to timely complete the recount. However, the canvassing board shall complete the recount prescribed in this subsection, along with any manual recount prescribed in s. 102.166, and certify election returns in accordance with the requirements of this chapter.
(d) The Department of State shall adopt detailed rules prescribing additional recount procedures for each certified voting system, which shall be uniform to the extent practicable.
(8) The canvassing board may employ such clerical help to assist with the work of the board as it deems necessary, with at least one member of the board present at all times, until the canvass of the returns is completed. The clerical help shall be paid from the same fund as inspectors and other necessary election officials.
(9) Each member, substitute member, and alternate member of the county canvassing board and all clerical help must wear identification badges during any period in which the county canvassing board is canvassing votes or engaging in other official duties. The identification badges should be worn in a conspicuous and unobstructed area, and include the name of the individual and his or her official position.
(10)(a) The supervisor shall file a report with the Division of Elections on the conduct of the election no later than 20 business days after the Elections Canvassing Commission certifies the election. The report must, at a minimum, describe all of the following:
1. All equipment or software malfunctions at the precinct level, at a counting location, or within computer and telecommunications networks supporting a county location, and the steps that were taken to address the malfunctions.
2. All election definition errors that were discovered after the logic and accuracy test, and the steps that were taken to address the errors.
3. All ballot printing errors, vote-by-mail ballot mailing errors, or ballot supply problems, and the steps that were taken to address the errors or problems.
4. All staffing shortages or procedural violations by employees or precinct workers which were addressed by the supervisor of elections or the county canvassing board during the conduct of the election, and the steps that were taken to correct such issues.
5. All instances where needs for staffing or equipment were insufficient to meet the needs of the voters.
6. Any additional information regarding material issues or problems associated with the conduct of the election.
(b) If a supervisor discovers new or additional information on any of the items required to be included in the report pursuant to paragraph (a) after the report is filed, the supervisor must notify the division that new information has been discovered no later than the next business day after the discovery, and the supervisor must file an amended report signed by the supervisor of elections on the conduct of the election within 10 days after the discovery.
(c) Such reports must be maintained on file in the Division of Elections and must be available for public inspection.
(d) The division shall review the conduct of election reports to determine what problems may be likely to occur in other elections and disseminate such information, along with possible solutions and training, to the supervisors of elections.
(e) The department shall submit the analysis of these reports for the general election as part of the consolidated reports required under ss. 101.591 and 101.595 to the Governor, the President of the Senate, and the Speaker of the House of Representatives by February 15 of each year following a general election.
(11) The supervisor shall file with the department a copy of or an export file from the results database of the county’s voting system and other statistical information as may be required by the department, the Legislature, or the Election Assistance Commission. The department shall adopt rules establishing the required content and acceptable formats for the filings and time for filings.
History.s. 46, ch. 6469, 1913; RGS 350; CGL 407; s. 11, ch. 13761, 1929; s. 6, ch. 26870, 1951; s. 1, ch. 57-104; s. 6, ch. 65-129; s. 19, ch. 73-334; s. 26, ch. 77-175; s. 47, ch. 79-400; s. 18, ch. 84-302; s. 4, ch. 86-33; s. 600, ch. 95-147; s. 41, ch. 2001-40; s. 20, ch. 2002-17; s. 26, ch. 2003-415; s. 58, ch. 2005-277; s. 33, ch. 2007-30; s. 14, ch. 2010-167; s. 43, ch. 2011-40; s. 19, ch. 2013-57; s. 34, ch. 2016-37; s. 10, ch. 2018-112; s. 36, ch. 2019-162; s. 4, ch. 2020-109; s. 31, ch. 2021-11; s. 36, ch. 2023-120.
Note.Former s. 102.45.

F.S. 102.141 on Google Scholar

F.S. 102.141 on CourtListener

Amendments to 102.141


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 102.141

Total Results: 25  |  Sort by: Relevance  |  Newest First

Copy

Ned L. Siegel, Georgette Sosa Douglas v. Theresa Lepore, Charles E. Burton, 234 F.3d 1163 (11th Cir. 2000).

Cited 670 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

...ial ticket received 2,907,351 votes, for a margin of difference of 1,784, or 0.0299% of the total Florida vote. 4 Under Florida law, county canvassing boards are responsible for determining the number of votes cast for each candidate. See Fla. Stat. § 102.141 . If a candidate for office is defeated by one-half of one percent or less of the votes cast for such office, the canvassing board must order a recount. See id. § 102.141(4)....
...Pursuant to the statute, a candidate or party can only request, not mandate, a manual recount, and the decision is made by a county canvassing board composed of three statutorily designated officials, including a county court judge, none of whom are active participants in the candidacy of any candidate. See Fla. Stat. §102.141 ....
...§102.166(5), (7)(b); the fact that the decision is made, not by an ad hoc board, but by an existing board composed of statutorily designated officials, including a county judge, who are not active participants in the candidacy of any candidate, see id. §102.141; the fact that canvassing board meetings and any manual recounts must be open to the public, see id....
...ates). 2 See Fl. Stat. Ann. § 102.166 (West 1989). See generally Roe v. Alabama, 43 F.3d 574 , 581-82 (11th Cir. 1995) (per curiam) (finding that the alteration of objective standards after the election disenfranchised voters). 3 See Fl. Stat. Ann. § 102.141 (providing that the County Canvassing Board shall be comprised of a county court judge, chairman of the board of county commissioners and supervisor of elections; Fl....
...138 Charts A - F, which are attached as appendices to this opinion, contain population and other demographic data, as well as relevant vote data on a county-by-county basis. 9 That vote data represents things as they stood on November 9, 2000, after the automatic machine recount required under Fla. Stat. § 102.141 (4) had been conducted....
Copy

Democratic Exec. Comm. of Florida v. Laurel M. Lee, 915 F.3d 1312 (11th Cir. 2019).

Cited 54 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

results are completely reported." Fla. Stat. § 102.141(4)(b). I refer to the relevant Florida statutes
Copy

Palm Beach Cnty. Canvassing Bd. v. Harris, 772 So. 2d 1273 (Fla. 2000).

Cited 36 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 2000 WL 1804707

...he voter must be discarded. Taken together, these sections suggest that "error in the vote tabulation" includes errors in the failure of the voting machinery to read a ballot and not simply *1284 errors resulting from the voting machinery. Moreover, section 102.141(4), which outlines the Board's responsibility in the event of a recount, states that the Board "shall examine the counters on the machines or the tabulation of the ballots cast in each precinct in which the office or issue appeared on the ballot and determine whether the returns correctly reflect the votes cast." § 102.141, Fla....
...ued this decision as expeditiously as possible under the foregoing time constraints in order to timely respond to the questions presented by the Supreme Court of the United States in the December 4, 2000, opinion and its remand instructions. [3] See § 102.141(4), Fla....
Copy

Robert Wexler v. Arthur Anderson, 452 F.3d 1226 (11th Cir. 2006).

Cited 33 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 15080, 2006 WL 1685802

...nt procedure in certain close elections. First, if the margin of victory is one-half of a percent or less, election officials conduct a “machine recount,” which entails re-tabulating ballots in precincts using optical scan ballots, Fla. Stat. § 102.141(6)(a), and, in touchscreen voting precincts, examining “the counters on the precinct tabulators to ensure that the total of the returns on the precinct tabulators equals the overall election return.” 3 Fla. Stat. § 102.141(6)(a)....
...Specifically, the state complaint asserted that Florida should not have approved and certified the Sequoia AVC Edge Voting System Release 3.1 for use in Palm Beach County because, as a paperless voting system, it does not allow for the manual recounts provided for by §§ 102.141 and 102.166 of the Florida statutes. The state circuit court dismissed the action on the grounds that Wexler lacked standing to pursue the claims....
Copy

Sarasota All. for Fair Elections, Inc. v. Browning, 28 So. 3d 880 (Fla. 2010).

Cited 15 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 35 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 101, 2010 Fla. LEXIS 218, 2010 WL 455276

...Third, the Election Code provides for the county canvassing board to conduct a recount of the votes cast when the election margin is one-half of a percent or less. However, the losing candidate has the option of requesting in writing that the recount not be conducted. § 102.141(6), Fla. Stat. (2006). Section 102.141(6)(a)-(c) also specifies how recounts are to be conducted and the votes tabulated. The statute requires the Department of State to "adopt detailed rules prescribing additional recount procedures for each certified voting system, which shall be uniform to the extent practicable." Id. § 102.141(6)(d)....
Copy

Beckstrom v. Volusia Cnty. Canvassing, 707 So. 2d 720 (Fla. 1998).

Cited 13 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1998 WL 120219

...judge of the circuit wherein such fraud is alleged to have occurred a sworn, written protest. [2] A county canvassing board is composed of the county supervisor of elections, a county court judge, and the chair of the board of county commissioners. § 102.141(1), Fla....
Copy

Palm Beach Cnty. Canvassing Bd. v. Harris, 772 So. 2d 1220 (Fla. 2000).

Cited 11 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 2000 WL 1725434

...351 votes. Because the overall difference in the total votes cast for each candidate was less than one-half of one percent of the total votes cast for that office (i.e., the difference was 1,784 votes), an automatic recount was conducted pursuant to section 102.141(4), Florida Statutes....
...t of the voter must be discarded. Taken together, these sections suggest that "error in the vote tabulation" includes errors in the failure of the voting machinery to read a ballot and not simply errors resulting from the voting machinery. Moreover, section 102.141(4), which outlines the Board's responsibility in the event of a recount, states that the Board "shall examine the counters on the machines or the tabulation of the ballots cast in each precinct in which the office or issue appeared on the ballot and determine whether the returns correctly reflect the votes cast." § 102.141, Fla....
...16, 2000, that there was "no legal impediment" to the manual recounts continuing, we deem it unnecessary to determine if we have a separate basis of jurisdiction for entertaining the writ. Accordingly, by separate order we dismiss the petition. [2] Section 102.141(4), Florida Statutes (2000), provides in pertinent part: (4) If the returns for any office reflect that a candidate was defeated or eliminated by one-half of a percent or less of the votes cast for such office ......
...[18] § 97.012, Fla. Stat. (2000). [19] § 98.015, Fla. Stat. (2000). [20] § 102.012(1), Fla. Stat. (2000). [21] § 102.012(1), Fla. Stat. (2000). [22] § 102.012(2), Fla. Stat. (2000). [23] § 102.012(4), Fla. Stat. (2000). [24] § 102.071, Fla. Stat. (2000). [25] § 102.141(3), Fla. Stat. (2000). [26] § 102.141(1), Fla. Stat. (2000). [27] § 102.141(2), Fla. Stat. (2000). [28] § 102.141(3), Fla....
Copy

Browning v. Sarasota All., 968 So. 2d 637 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007).

Cited 8 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2007 WL 3170111

...Specifically, sections 102.012 to 102.014 confer upon local supervisors of elections certain powers to appoint election *644 boards, recruit poll workers, and conduct training. Section 102.031 sets forth whose presence is permitted in polling rooms and voting areas. Section 102.141 dictates the duties of local county canvassing boards, as well as who shall serve on those boards....
...Most important to the issues on appeal, sections 102.071, 102.131, and 102.151 set forth detailed procedures for the canvassing and certification of election results — from how to tabulate and certify votes to when election results must be submitted to the Department of State. Sections 102.141(6) and 102.166 set forth when recounts are required....
...Therefore, because compliance with the outer limits of the Election Code's timeframe leaves no time to complete the SAFE amendment's audits, the provisions of the SAFE amendment, the Election Code, and attendant regulations seem to conflict. The Appellants also point out that section 102.141(6) [12] of the Election Code sets forth when recounts are required and that the SAFE amendment conflicts by mandating its own recount procedures....
...Under section 101.048(1), Florida Statutes (2007), a person casting a provisional ballot has until 5 p.m. on the second day following election to support his or her eligibility to vote. [12] The May 2007 amendments to the Election Code moved these provisions to section 102.141(7) of the statute....
...[14] Even the trial court expressed concern about the constitutionality of this provision, stating: "Section 6.2C . . . prohibiting certification of elections prior to completion of the mandatory audits . . . does appear to be in conflict with the provisions of Section 102.141, Florida Statutes....
Copy

Wexler v. Lepore, 878 So. 2d 1276 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004).

Cited 8 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2004 WL 1753408

...The Board of *1279 County Commissioners, after consultation with the Supervisor of Elections, may approve, purchase or procure the use of, an approved voting system. See § 101.5604, Fla. Stat. (2003). Florida's recount procedures are governed by sections 102.141 and 102.166, Florida Statutes (2003), which contain procedures for recounts in two instances. The first instance occurs when the margin of victory is one- half of a percent or less. In this instance, a machine recount occurs. See § 102.141(6), Fla....
...electronic systems and those using paper ballots. In counties with paper ballot systems, the recount consists of putting each ballot through the automatic tabulating equipment and determining whether the returns correctly reflect the votes cast. See § 102.141(6)(a), Fla. Stat. (2003). For counties using electronic systems, the recount consists of examining the counters on the precinct tabulators to ensure the total returns on the tabulators equal the overall election return. See § 102.141(6)(b), Fla....
...This places Secretary Hood in violation of her statutorily-imposed duty to approve a system in compliance with the law. It also places Supervisor Lepore in violation of her statutorily-imposed duty to recommend a system in compliance with the law. We disagree. With regard to a recount, section 102.141(6)(a) and (b), Florida Statutes (2003), makes an express distinction between voting systems which use paper ballots and those that do not. In counties that do not use paper ballots, the counters of the precinct tabulators are presumed correct. See § 102.141(6)(b), Fla....
...abulating equipment and determine whether the returns correctly *1281 reflect the votes cast. If a ballot is physically damaged so that it cannot be properly counted, there is a procedure in place to take corrective measures to repeat the count. See § 102.141(6)(a), Fla....
...The adoption of the rules has rendered the Congressman's request for a declaratory judgment moot. He must now challenge the adopted rules. [5] Injunctive Relief The trial court also held Congressman Wexler failed to state a cause of action for injunctive relief. The court held that under sections 101.5603(2) and (8) and 102.141(6)(b), the statutory scheme did not require a voter-verified paper ballot; therefore, Congressman Wexler did not have a clear legal right to an injunction ordering the creation of such ballots....
Copy

Siegel v. LePore, 120 F. Supp. 2d 1041 (S.D. Fla. 2000).

Cited 7 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 29 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1190, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16333, 2000 WL 1687185

...Ordinarily, the board is made up of the supervisor of elections, a county court Judge, and the chair of the board of county commissioners. See Fla. Stat. § 102.131(1). The canvassing *1045 boards are responsible for counting the votes given each candidate. See Fla. Stat. § 102.141(2)....
...The Commission also issues certificates of the result of the election for federal and state officers, including presidential electors. See Fla. Stat. § 102.121. County canvassing boards are obligated to file a report with the Division of Elections at the same time the results of an election are certified. See Fla. Stat. § 102.141(6)....
...The circuit courts are authorized to provide any relief that is appropriate. See Fla. Stat. § 102.168(8). District courts of appeal and the Florida Supreme Court are available to review circuit court orders. In this case. the initial phase of election verification began automatically because Florida Statutes, § 102.141(4), compels machine recount for electoral differentials of 0.5% or less....
...As required by the statute, those requests set forth reasons, which included the extraordinary closeness of the statewide margin, as well as concern as to whether the vote totals reliably reflected the true will of the Florida voters. Broward County On November 8, 2000, pursuant to Fla. Stat. § 102.141(4), the Broward Canvassing Board conducted a statutorily mandated machine recount which is now complete....
...On November 8, 2000, Deanie Lowe, Supervisor of Elections for Volusia County, provided to the Canvassing Board the directive of the Florida Secretary of State to conduct a mandatory recount of the presidential election pursuant to Florida Statutes, § 102.141(4)....
Copy

Repub. State Exec. Comm. v. Graham, 388 So. 2d 556 (Fla. 1980).

Cited 4 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida

...This section requires the secretary of state to certify the names of "qualified candidates for nomination or election" to the supervisor of elections. We note that throughout the election laws candidate for nomination and for election are used interchangeably. See § 102.141, Fla....
Copy

Florida Democratic Party v. Hood, 884 So. 2d 1148 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2004 WL 2402451

...r to be of great public importance. The Department is responsible for examining and certifying electronic and electromechanical voting systems in Florida. § 101.5605, Fla. Stat. (2004). Florida's election recount procedures are governed by sections 102.141 and 102.166, Florida Statutes (2004), which create a two-stage process for recounts. A machine recount is triggered if the margin of victory is one-half of a percent or less. § 102.141(6)....
...s of touchscreen voting systems currently exist. The absence of a rule with applicable standards and procedures will have an adverse effect on the conduct of elections in the State of Florida. In the event that the results of a machine recount under section 102.141, Florida Statutes, trigger the requirement for a manual recount under section 102.166, Florida Statutes, counties with touchscreen voting systems would have to conduct a manual recount without applicable standards or procedures, unless an emergency rule is immediately adopted....
Copy

Touchston v. McDermott, 120 F. Supp. 2d 1055 (M.D. Fla. 2000).

Cited 2 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 2000 WL 1713943

...r a temporary injunction at 2:00 p.m. today. Counsel for Plaintiffs was told to notify the Defendants of the hearing as soon as possible and to be prepared to certify at the hearing what efforts were made to inform the Defendants of the hearing. [2] Section 102.141(4), Florida Statutes, provides in relevant part, "If the returns for any office reflect that a candidate was defeated or eliminated by one-half of a percent or less of the votes cast for such office ......
Copy

State, Chappell v. Martinez, 536 So. 2d 1007 (Fla. 1988).

Cited 2 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1988 Fla. LEXIS 1292

...In the November 8, 1988 general election Craig James received 125,467 votes and Chappell received 124,735 in the race for Florida's Fourth Congressional District. Because less than one-half of one percent of the votes cast separated the candidates, the votes had to be recounted pursuant to section 102.141, Florida Statutes (1987)....
Copy

Touchston v. Mcdermott, 234 F.3d 1133 (11th Cir. 2000).

Cited 2 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

...The margin of difference between the Republican and Democratic tickets was 1784 votes, or 0.0299% of the total votes cast in Florida. 10 Florida law requires an automatic recount in all races where, as here, the final differential between two candidates is 0.5% or less. Fla. Stat. 102.141(4)....
...97.012(1), but the actual conducting of elections takes place in each of the various counties of Florida under the auspices of the county supervisor of elections. 8 County canvassing boards are responsible for counting the votes given to each candidate, Fla. Stat. 102.141, and they may, sua sponte, order mechanical recounts "[i]f there is a discrepancy which could affect the outcome of an election." Fla....
...Each county supervisor employs deputy supervisors. Fla. Stat. 98.015(8). Additionally, each county has a canvassing board, which typically consists of the supervisor of elections, a county court judge, and the chair of the board of county commissioners. Fla. Stat. 102.141(1)....
...ing location, any difficulties or unusual circumstances encountered by an election board or the canvassing board, and any other additional information which the canvassing board feels should be made a part of the official election record. Fla. Stat. 102.141(6)....
...rotest of the election returns. Neither of these provisions, however, affects the baseline system. The automatic recount provision requires a recount of all votes in a race decided after the first count by one-half of one percent or less. Fla. Stat. 102.141(4)....
...didates). 2 See Fl. Stat. Ann. 102.166 (West 1989). See generally Roe v. Alabama, 43 F.3d 574 , 581-82 (11th Cir.1995) (per curiam) (finding that the alteration of objective standards after the election disenfranchised voters). 3 See Fla. Stat. Ann. 102.141 (providing that the County Canvassing Board shall be comprised of a county court judge, chairman of the board of county commissioners and supervisor of elections); Fla....
Copy

Morse v. Dade Cnty. Canvassing Bd., 456 So. 2d 1314 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

...esentatives, District 113, null and void, and (2) ordered a new election to take place on October 2nd, between all three candidates, with a possible run-off election to be held on October 9th. The duties of the county canvassing board are set out in Section 102.141, Florida Statutes (1983)....
...Even where there is a discrepancy between the tabulation of ballots and the returns, the statute requires that tabulation of ballots be presumed correct and that the board canvass the votes accordingly. After completion of the canvassing pursuant to Section 102.141 the board is obligated, in the absence of a protest, to certify the results to the Department of State, the clerk of the circuit court, and the supervisor of elections....
Copy

Gore v. Harris, 773 So. 2d 524 (Fla. 2000).

Cited 1 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 2000 WL 1867628

...Lepore, 234 F.3d 1163, 1168 (11th Cir. 2000). Because the margin of victory was less than "one-half of a percent ... of the votes cast," pursuant to Florida's Election Code, an automatic machine recount was conducted in each county in this State. [17] § 102.141(4), Fla....
...Although the Secretary of State is the chief election officer of the state, see section 97.102(1), Florida Statutes (2000), the actual conduct of elections occurs in Florida counties with the county canvassing boards in each county responsible for counting the votes given each county. See § 102.131(1), § 102.141(2), Fla.Stat....
Copy

People Against Tax Rev. Mismanagement, Inc. v. Leon Cty. Canvassing Bd., 573 So. 2d 31 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1990 WL 223866

..., nominee, constitutional amendment, or other measure submitted to the electorate, and to examine the counters on the voting machines or the tabulation of the ballots cast in each precinct to ensure that the returns correctly reflect the votes cast. Section 102.141, Florida Statutes (1987)....
Copy

Kinney v. Putnam Cnty. Canvassing Bd., 253 So. 3d 1254 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal

...Putnam County (“the office”). 1 The initial results indicated that Kinney received 18 more votes than DeLoach, but because the margin of victory was within one half of a percentage point, a mandatory recount of the ballots was triggered pursuant to section 102.141(7), Florida Statutes (2016)....
Copy

Adams v. Canvassing Bd. of Broward Cnty., 421 So. 2d 34 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21952

...In the September 7, 1982 primary election, Thomas Armstrong won the Democratic nomination for District 96 State Representative. The first count of the computer ballots showed that Armstrong received 18 more votes than did appellant, John Adams. The recount mandated by Section 102.141(4), Florida Statutes revealed two additional votes for Armstrong and five additional votes for appellant....
Copy

Democratic Senatorial Campaign Comm. v. Detzner, 347 F. Supp. 3d 1033 (N.D. Fla. 2018).

Published | District Court, N.D. Florida

SO ORDERED on November 15, 2018.
Copy

Democratic Exec. Comm. of Florida v. Laurel M. Lee (11th Cir. 2019).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

...to the Department of State within 30 minutes after the polls close. Thereafter, the canvassing board shall report . . . updated precinct election results to the department at least every 45 minutes until all results are completely reported.” Fla. Stat. § 102.141(4)(b). 10 I refer to the relevant Florida statutes as the “Election Code” or “Code.” 11 Plaintiffs also asked the Court to toll the county canvassing boards’ deadline for submitting “unoffi...
...ballot has been rejected based on a problem with the signatures. 34 By statute, each county canvassing board consists of the supervisor of elections, a county court judge, and the chair of the board of county commissioners. Id. § 102.141(1). 66 Case: 18-14758 Date Filed: 02/15/2019 Page: 67 of 83 books “to determine the legality of that vote-by-mail ballot.” 35 Id....
Copy

Robert C. Touchston v. Michael McDermott, 234 F.3d 1133 (11th Cir. 2000).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2000 WL 1781942

...date of election. Fl. Admin. Code Ann. r. 1S-2.013(2), (7). 5 Florida law requires an automatic recount in all races where, as here, the final differential between two candidates is 0.5% or less. Fla. Stat. § 102.141(4)....
...§ 97.012(1), but the actual conducting of elections takes place in each of the various counties of Florida under the auspices of the county supervisor of elections.8 County canvassing boards are responsible for counting the votes given to each candidate, Fla. Stat. § 102.141, and they may, sua sponte, order mechanical recounts “[i]f there is a discrepancy which could affect the outcome of an election.” Fla....
...Each county supervisor employs deputy supervisors. Fla. Stat. § 98.015(8). Additionally, each county has a canvassing board, which typically consists of the supervisor of elections, a county court judge, and the chair of the board of county commissioners. Fla. Stat. § 102.141(1). 9 County canvassing boards are required to file a report on the “conduct of the election” with the Division of Elections at the same time that the results of an election are certified to the Department of State....
...canvassing board shall: (a) Correct the error and recount the remaining precincts with the vote tabulation system; (b) Request the Department of State to verify the tabulation software; or election record. Fla. Stat.§ 102.141(6). 9 (c) Manually recount all ballots. Fl....
...rotest of the election returns. Neither of these provisions, however, affects the baseline system. The automatic recount provision requires a recount of all votes in a race decided after the first count by one-half of one percent or less. Fla. Stat. § 102.141(4). Since this recount is a non-discretionary repeat of the initial count, I deem it to be nothing more than a re-do of the first machine count....
...an --- and humans vote. Thus, it should not be surprising that the voting process is subject to error. However, as demonstrated in the recent Presidential election, the frequency, magnitude and variety of error 3 See Fl. Stat. Ann. § 102.141 (providing that the County Canvassing Board shall be comprised of a county court judge, chairman of the board of county commissioners and supervisor of elections; Fl....
Copy

Ned L. Siegel v. Theresa Lepore (11th Cir. 2000).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

...the Democratic Party presidential ticket received 2,907,351 votes, for a margin of difference of 1,784, or 0.0299% of the total Florida vote. Under Florida law, county canvassing boards are responsible for determining the number of votes cast for each candidate. See Fla. Stat. § 102.141. If a candidate for office is defeated by one-half of one percent or less of the votes cast for such office, the canvassing board must order a recount. See id. § 102.141(4)....
... request, not mandate, a manual recount, and the decision is made by a county canvassing board composed of three statutorily designated officials, including a county court judge, none of whom are active participants in the candidacy of any candidate. See Fla. Stat. §102.141....
...§102.166(5), (7)(b); the fact that the decision is made, not by an ad hoc board, but by an existing board composed of statutorily designated officials, including a county judge, who are not active participants in the candidacy of any candidate, see id. §102.141; the fact that canvassing board meetings and any manual recounts must be open to the public, see id....
...However, as demonstrated in the recent Presidential election, the frequency, magnitude and variety of error associated with the exercise of this sacred right of citizenship is at once astounding and deeply troubling. Morever, the media’s focus on the campaign preceding 3 See Fl. Stat. Ann. § 102.141 (providing that the County Canvassing Board shall be comprised of a county court judge, chairman of the board of county commissioners and supervisor of elections; Fl....
...it would count as a vote for another candidate. 88 by-county basis.9 That vote data represents things as they stood on November 9, 2000, after the automatic machine recount required under Fla. Stat. § 102.141(4) had been conducted....
Copy

Goldsmith v. McDonald, 32 So. 3d 713 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 4499, 35 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 781

...February 17th (when last checked by the Supervisor's office) and 7:00 p.m. February 17, 2009." The trial court held the procedures employed by the supervisor complied with the statutes. That decision is amply supported by the law and the record on appeal. Affirmed. GROSS, C.J., and CIKLIN, J., concur. NOTES [1] See § 102.141(7), Fla....

This Florida statute resource is curated by Graham W. Syfert, Esq., a Jacksonville, Florida personal injury and workers' compensation attorney. For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.