The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE

Chapter 83
LANDLORD AND TENANT

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 83.11

83.11 Distress for rent; complaint.—Any person to whom any rent or money for advances is due or the person’s agent or attorney may file an action in the court in the county where the land lies having jurisdiction of the amount claimed, and the court shall have jurisdiction to order the relief provided in this part. The complaint shall be verified and shall allege the name and relationship of the defendant to the plaintiff, how the obligation for rent arose, the amount or quality and value of the rent due for such land, or the advances, and whether payable in money, an agricultural product, or any other thing of value.

History.—s. 2, ch. 3131, 1879; RS 1764; GS 2240; RGS 3559; CGL 5423; s. 34, ch. 67-254; s. 1, ch. 80-282; s. 431, ch. 95-147.

F.S. 83.11 on Google Scholar

F.S. 83.11 on Casetext

Amendments to 83.11

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 83.11

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 83.11.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

AGUA CALIENTE TRIBE OF CUPE O INDIANS OF PALA RESERVATION, v. SWEENEY, 932 F.3d 1207 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . . § 83.11. . . . (f)," id. , where § 83.11(f) explains how a tribe whose membership is composed principally of persons . . . who have formerly been enrolled in another tribe may still obtain recognition, id . § 83.11(f). . . . Id . § 83.11(b), (f). . . . Id . § 83.11. . . .

SINKLER, v. A. BERRYHILL,, 932 F.3d 83 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . R. 83.11(D) (affording 30 days); D. Minn. Loc. R. 7.2(e) (affording 30 days); D. Me. Loc. . . .

TOLOWA NATION, v. UNITED STATES, 380 F. Supp. 3d 959 (N.D. Cal. 2019)

. . . . § 83.11(a)(1). . . .

KOI NATION OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR,, 361 F. Supp. 3d 14 (D.D.C. 2019)

. . . . § 83.11(a) - (c), (e) ). . . .

IN RE NC VA WARRANTY COMPANY, INC. A. NC VA v., 594 B.R. 316 (Bankr. M.D. N.C. 2018)

. . . District of North Carolina has referred this case and this proceeding to this Court by its Local Rule 83.11 . . .

GASKINS, v. J. MCINTYRE,, 314 F. Supp. 3d 365 (D.D.C. 2018)

. . . in a civil case, the court ordinarily would be guided by the factors set forth in Local Civil Rule 83.11 . . . Circuit has recognized that Local Civil Rule 83.11"differs only slightly from the Poindexter factors, . . .

HAYES, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,, 895 F.3d 449 (6th Cir. 2018)

. . . L.R. 83.11(d). . . . Local Rule 83.11(d) of the Eastern District of Kentucky authorizes fee petitions to be filed within 30 . . . and fifth factors, Cybriwsky was on notice prior to the commencement of this action that Local Rule 83.11 . . . Rule 83.11 was last amended in December 2009, well before the commencement of this action and that amendment . . . Ky., L.R. 83.11(d) (West); Joint Gen. Order No 09-04 (E.D. Ky. Dec. 2, 2009). . . .

IN RE P. CASWELL, D. E. v. P. D., 588 B.R. 439 (Bankr. M.D. N.C. 2018)

. . . District of North Carolina has referred this case and this proceeding to this Court by its Local Rule 83.11 . . .

CHINOOK INDIAN NATION, v. K. ZINKE,, 326 F. Supp. 3d 1128 (W.D. Wash. 2018)

. . . . § 83.11 after the BIA revised the federal acknowledgment regulations in 2015. . . . . § 83.11(a) (2015). . . .

L. VIOLA, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, 306 F. Supp. 3d 321 (D.D.C. 2018)

. . . See LCvR 83.11(b)(3). . . . Aug. 27, 2008) ; LCvR 83.11(b)(3). . . .

PARTRIDGE, v. AMERICAN HOSPITAL MANAGEMENT COMPANY, LLC,, 289 F. Supp. 3d 1 (D.D.C. 2017)

. . . R. 83.11(b)(3) (limiting appointment of counsel to pro se litigants, a status denied to corporations) . . .

IN RE WOODY,, 578 B.R. 739 (Bankr. M.D.N.C. 2017)

. . . District of North Carolina has referred this case and this proceeding to this Court by its Local Rule 83.11 . . .

IN RE YOUNG, P. C. v., 578 B.R. 312 (Bankr. M.D.N.C. 2017)

. . . District of North Carolina has referred this case and this proceeding to this Court by its Local Rule 83.11 . . .

A. WILLIAMS, v. J. BRENNAN,, 285 F. Supp. 3d 1 (D.D.C. 2017)

. . . Millennium Challenge Corp. , 228 F.Supp.3d 28, 47 (D.D.C. 2017) ); see also Local Civil Rule 83.11(b) . . .

PINSON, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,, 273 F. Supp. 3d 1 (D.D.C. 2017)

. . . Circuit held that Local Civil Rule 83.11 “provides the relevant factors for deciding motions for the . . . According to Local Civil Rule 83.11(b)(3), a judge should consider the following factors: “(i) Nature . . .

IN RE WASHABAUGH, P. v., 572 B.R. 141 (Bankr. M.D.N.C. 2017)

. . . . §§ 151, 157 and 1334, and Local Rule 83.11 of the United States District Court for the Middle District . . .

MCKEE, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,, 253 F. Supp. 3d 78 (D.D.C. 2017)

. . . R. 83.11(b)(3)). . . .

FRANK S LANDING INDIAN COMMUNITY, v. NATIONAL INDIAN GAMING COMMISSION,, 242 F. Supp. 3d 1156 (W.D. Wash. 2017)

. . . . § 83.11. B. . . .

LAMB, v. MILLENNIUM CHALLENGE CORPORATION,, 228 F. Supp. 3d 28 (D.D.C. 2017)

. . . L.Cv.R. 83.11(b)(3). . . .

IN RE NC VA WARRANTY COMPANY, INC. A. v. LLC,, 556 B.R. 182 (Bankr. M.D.N.C. 2016)

. . . . §§ 157 and 1334, and Local Rule 83.11 of the United States District Court for the Middle District of . . .

CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF GRAND RONDE COMMUNITY OF OREGON, v. JEWELL,, 830 F.3d 552 (D.C. Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 83.11(b). . . .

CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF GRAND RONDE COMMUNITY OF OREGON, v. JEWELL,, 830 F.3d 754 (D.C. Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 83.11(b). . . .

CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF GRAND RONDE COMMUNITY OF OREGON, v. JEWELL,, 424 U.S. App. D.C. 292 (D.C. Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 83.11(b). . . .

MACKINAC TRIBE, v. JEWELL, U. S., 829 F.3d 754 (D.C. Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 83.11(a)-(c), (e). . . .

MACKINAC TRIBE, v. JEWELL, U. S., 829 F.3d 754 (D.C. Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 83.11(a)-(c), (e). . . .

MACKINAC TRIBE, v. JEWELL, U. S., 424 U.S. App. D.C. 236 (D.C. Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 83.11(a)-(c), (e). . . .

TRUSTEES OF THE OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL PENSION v. GLENCORP, INC. a A., 178 F. Supp. 3d 600 (E.D. Mich. 2016)

. . . See Eastern District of Michigan Local Rule 83.11(b)(7)(C). . . .

IN RE SPORTS LEISURE, LLC, d b a M. III, LLC, v. LLC d b a J. a k a J., 544 B.R. 833 (Bankr. M.D.N.C. 2015)

. . . . §§ 151, 157, and Local Rule 83.11 entered by the United States District Court for the Middle District . . .

IN RE JEFFRIES, P. W. v., 541 B.R. 317 (Bankr. M.D.N.C. 2015)

. . . . §§ 1334 and 157(a) and Local Rule 83.11 entered by the United States District Court for the Middle . . .

IN RE HUBBARD, 539 B.R. 484 (Bankr. M.D.N.C. 2015)

. . . . §§ 151, 157, 1334(b), and Local Rule 83.11 of the United States District Court for the Middle District . . .

IN RE CLEAN BURN FUELS, LLC, A. LLC, v. LLC,, 540 B.R. 195 (Bankr. M.D.N.C. 2015)

. . . . §§ 1334 and 157(a) and Local Rule 83.11 of the District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina . . .

CUSTIS, v. CIA, t, 118 F. Supp. 3d 252 (D.D.C. 2015)

. . . See LCvR 83.11(3). Moreover, this Court finds no basis for such appointment in the Petition. . . .

UDX, LLC, v. A. HEAVNER,, 533 B.R. 511 (M.D.N.C. 2015)

. . . Heavner’s Motion for Referral Heavner argues that, pursuant to Local Rule 83.11, this matter should be . . . See Local Rule 83.11. . . . Carolina (Doc. 17) is GRANTED and the case is referred to the bankruptcy court pursuant to Local Rule 83.11 . . .

ELI GLOBAL, LLC, v. UNIVERSITY DIRECTORIES, LLC,, 532 B.R. 249 (M.D.N.C. 2015)

. . . . § 157(a) and Local Rule 83.11, the matter was referred to the bankruptcy court in this district. . . .

PINSON, v. U. S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,, 104 F. Supp. 3d 30 (D.D.C. 2015)

. . . LCvR 83.11(b)(3) In the instant case, Mr. . . .

BAROT, v. EMBASSY OF THE REPUBLIC OF ZAMBIA,, 785 F.3d 26 (C.C.D.C. 2015)

. . . Local Rule 83.11(b)(4)(i), The Marshal, however, attempted service at the Embassy in Washington, D.C. . . .

COUSART, v. METRO TRANSIT POLICE CHIEF,, 101 F. Supp. 3d 27 (D.D.C. 2015)

. . . LCvR 83.11(b)(3). . . .

IN RE NIGHTINGALE, v., 529 B.R. 641 (Bankr. M.D.N.C. 2015)

. . . . § 157 and Local Rule 83.11 for the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina . . .

In BOYD, Jr. v. Jr. a k a A., 525 B.R. 299 (Bankr. M.D.N.C. 2015)

. . . . §§ 151, 157, and 1334 and Local Rule 83.11 entered by the United States District Court for the Middle . . .

In DAMBOWSKY, J. Jr. v. a k a, 526 B.R. 590 (Bankr. M.D.N.C. 2015)

. . . See Local Rule 83.11 for the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina. . . .

In SMITH, v., 522 B.R. 788 (Bankr. M.D.N.C. 2014)

. . . . § 157(a) and Local Rule 83.11 of the United States District Court for the Middle District of North . . .

In PAGE, 519 B.R. 908 (Bankr. M.D.N.C. 2014)

. . . . §§ 151, 157, and 1334 and Local Rule 83.11 entered by the United States District Court for the Middle . . .

MOKHTAR, v. F. KERRY,, 285 F. Supp. 3d 56 (D.D.C. 2014)

. . . R. 83.11(b)(3); Gaviria , 476 F.3d at 943 (citing Rule 83.11 as "the appropriate metric for evaluating . . .

DEWITT, v. CORIZON, INC., 760 F.3d 654 (7th Cir. 2014)

. . . L.R. 83.11(g). See also Henderson, 755 F.3d at 563, 2014 WL 2757473 at *3 n. 1; Synergy Assocs. v. . . .

PINSON, v. U. S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,, 55 F. Supp. 3d 80 (D.D.C. 2014)

. . . LCvR 83.11(b)(3) (listing four factors to consider in determining whether to appoint counsel for a pro . . .

In HAMILTON,, 513 B.R. 292 (Bankr. M.D.N.C. 2014)

. . . . §§ 151, 157, and 1334 and Local Rule 83.11 of the United States District Court for the Middle District . . .

B. SIVAK, v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE COMPANY,, 28 F. Supp. 3d 701 (E.D. Mich. 2014)

. . . This Court accepted reassignment pursuant to Local Rule 83.11 on July 28, 2014. (Id. at Dkt. # 6). . . .

E. RYAN, v. M. HYDEN, a, 581 F. App'x 653 (9th Cir. 2014)

. . . Civil Rule 83.11 of the Local Rules of the United States District Court for the Southern District of . . .

HENDERSON, v. GHOSH,, 755 F.3d 559 (7th Cir. 2014)

. . . Local Rule 83.11(g). . . .

In GAUSE, v., 525 B.R. 35 (Bankr. M.D.N.C. 2014)

. . . . §§ 151, 157, and 1334 and Local Rule 83.11 entered by the United States District Court for the Middle . . .

GREGGS, v. AUTISM SPEAKS,, 987 F. Supp. 2d 48 (D.D.C. 2013)

. . . R. 83.11(b)(3); Gaviria, 476 F.3d at 943 (citing Rule 83.11 as “the appropriate metric for evaluating . . .

J. OJELADE, v. UNITY HEALTH CARE, INC., 962 F. Supp. 2d 258 (D.D.C. 2013)

. . . R. 83.11(b)(3); Gavina,- 476-F.3d at 943 (citing Rule 83.11 as “the appropriate metric for evaluating . . .

In CLEAN BURN FUELS, LLC, LLC, v. LLC,, 492 B.R. 445 (Bankr. M.D.N.C. 2013)

. . . . §§ 151, 157 and 1334, and Local Rule 83.11 of the United States District Court for the Middle District . . .

A. WILLIAMS, Jr. v. COURT SERVICES AND OFFENDER SUPERVISION AGENCY FOR D. C., 937 F. Supp. 2d 41 (D.D.C. 2013)

. . . LCvR 83.11(b)(3). . . .

ARMSTEAD, v. HSBC CARD SERVICES,, 935 F. Supp. 2d 907 (C.D. Ill. 2013)

. . . L.R. 5.1(D), 83.11. The Plaintiff has a history of filing late appeals. See Armstead v. . . .

HISTORIC EASTERN PEQUOTS, v. SALAZAR,, 934 F. Supp. 2d 272 (D.D.C. 2013)

. . . . § 83.11(h)(3).” See 70 Fed. Reg. 60,099-01 (Oct. 14, 2005). 25 C.F.R. . . . Section 83.11(h)(3) provides that “[i]f a determination is reconsidered by the Assistant Secretary because . . .

MUWEKMA OHLONE TRIBE, v. SALAZAR, K., 708 F.3d 209 (D.C. Cir. 2013)

. . . . § 83.11(a)(1). . . . Id. § 83.11(a)(2). Muwekma is a group of American Indians from the San Francisco Bay area. . . .

MORENO v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 925 F. Supp. 2d 93 (D.D.C. 2013)

. . . retain counsel, the Court, having considered the factors for appointing counsel under Local Civil Rule 83.11 . . .

In PACE AIRLINES, INC. J. a v., 483 B.R. 306 (Bankr. M.D.N.C. 2012)

. . . . §§ 151, 157 and 1334, and Local Rule 83.11 of the United States District Court for the Middle District . . .

THOMAS, v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY,, 907 F. Supp. 2d 144 (D.D.C. 2012)

. . . 737 F.2d 1173, 1185 (D.C.Cir.1984)); see also Willis, 274 F.3d at 532 (noting that “the local rule [83.11 . . .

In MAROTTA, In In In H. In In In In Jr. In In In In In W., 479 B.R. 681 (Bankr. M.D.N.C. 2012)

. . . . §§ 151, 157 and 1334, and Local Rule 83.11 of the United States District Court for the Middle District . . .

A. WILLIAMS, Jr. v. COURT SERVICES AND OFFENDER SUPERVISION AGENCY FOR D. C., 878 F. Supp. 2d 263 (D.D.C. 2012)

. . . Local Civil Rule 83.11(b)(3). A. . . .

ALLEN, v. UNITED STATES, 871 F. Supp. 2d 982 (N.D. Cal. 2012)

. . . . § 83.11(e)(8). . . .

In SOUTHEASTERN MATERIALS, INC. PO NC W. v. M. D. C. D., 467 B.R. 337 (Bankr. M.D.N.C. 2012)

. . . Pursuant to Local Rule 83.11, the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina . . .

In FREEWAY FOODS OF GREENSBORO, INC. H. v. M. R. S., 467 B.R. 853 (Bankr. M.D.N.C. 2012)

. . . . §§ 151, 157 and 1334, and Local Rule 83.11 of the United States District Court for the Middle District . . .

In CASPER, v., 466 B.R. 786 (Bankr. M.D.N.C. 2012)

. . . . §§ 157 and 1334, and Local Rule 83.11 of the United States District Court for the Middle District of . . .

BARBETT, v. LOGISTICS APPLICATION, INC., 845 F. Supp. 2d 164 (D.D.C. 2012)

. . . Under Local Civil Rule 83.11(b)(3), the Court may appoint counsel in a civil case. . . .

FHARMACY RECORDS, v. NASSAR,, 465 F. App'x 448 (6th Cir. 2012)

. . . L.R. 83.11(d), referred to and denied by another district judge, the Honorable Stephen J. . . .

In FREEWAY FOODS OF GREENSBORO, INC. a a v. M. R. M. GMF U A D R. LRF U A D v. W. Jr. S., 466 B.R. 750 (Bankr. M.D.N.C. 2012)

. . . Pursuant to Local Rule 83.11, the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina . . .

L. BANACKI, v. ONEWEST BANK, FSB,, 276 F.R.D. 567 (E.D. Mich. 2011)

. . . Cases are assigned in the Eastern District of Michigan randomly by “blind draw,” see L.R. 83.11(a), and . . . L.R. 83.11(b). . . . Local Rule 83.11(b)(7)(D) provides: When it becomes apparent to the Judge to whom a case is assigned . . . L.R. 83.11(b)(7)(D). . . . L.R. 83.11(b)(7)(A). . . .

In TAYLOR- RAMSEY CORPORATION, v. P. Jr., 458 B.R. 270 (Bankr. M.D.N.C. 2011)

. . . . §§ 157 and 1334, and Local Rule 83.11 of the United States District Court for the Middle District of . . .

In SCHOFIELD- JOHNSON, LLC, LLC, v., 462 B.R. 539 (Bankr. M.D.N.C. 2011)

. . . . §§ 151, 157 and 1334, and Local Rule 83.11 of the United States District Court for the Middle District . . .

BICKFORD, v. GOVERNMENT OF UNITED STATES,, 808 F. Supp. 2d 175 (D.D.C. 2011)

. . . R. 83.11). . . . R. 83.11(b)(3). Thus, the Court will deny Ms. . . .

In MICHAEL, B. D. v., 452 B.R. 908 (Bankr. M.D.N.C. 2011)

. . . . §§ 151, 157 and 1334, and Local Rule 83.11 of the United States District Court for the Middle District . . .

In SOUTHEASTERN MATERIALS, INC. W. v., 452 B.R. 170 (Bankr. M.D.N.C. 2011)

. . . . §§ 151, 157 and 1334, and Local Rule 83.11 of the United States District Court for the Middle District . . .

In PTM TECHNOLOGIES, INC. PTM v. LLC, PTM v., 452 B.R. 165 (Bankr. M.D.N.C. 2011)

. . . . §§ 151, 157, and 1334, and Local Rule 83.11 of the United States District Court for the Middle District . . .

In FREEWAY FOODS OF GREENSBORO, INC. H. v. M. R., 449 B.R. 860 (Bankr. M.D.N.C. 2011)

. . . . §§ 151, 157 and 1334, and Local Rule 83.11 of the United States District Court for the Middle District . . .

In FIRST STREET MART, INC., 450 B.R. 581 (Bankr. M.D.N.C. 2011)

. . . . §§ 151, 157 and 1334, and Local Rule 83.11 of the United States District Court for the Middle District . . .

L. BROWN, v. CHILDREN S NATIONAL MEDICAL CENTER,, 773 F. Supp. 2d 125 (D.D.C. 2011)

. . . Pursuant to this authority, Local Civil Rule 83.11 provides: When leave has been granted pursuant to . . . of Investigation, 274 F.3d at 532 (affirming application of the factors set forth in the former LCvR 83.11 . . .

UNITED STATES v. B. CAMPBELL,, 771 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 2011)

. . . LCvR 83.11(b)(3); Gaviria v. . . . Reynolds, 476 F.3d 940, 943 (D.C.Cir.2007) (explaining that LCvR 83.11(b)(3) provides the “metric for . . .

CHAMBERLAIN, v. REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC. P. C. J. D., 757 F. Supp. 2d 683 (E.D. Mich. 2010)

. . . L.R. 83.11 to this Court on August 14 2008, is a tag-a-long case to the multidistrict antitrust litigation . . .

A. RENOIR, v. GOVERNOR OF VIRGINIA,, 755 F. Supp. 2d 82 (D.D.C. 2010)

. . . . § 1915(e)(1); see LCvR 83.11(b)(3). . . . LCvR 83.11(b)(3); Gaviria v. . . . Reynolds, 476 F.3d 940, 943 (D.C.Cir.2007) (noting that Local Civil Rule 83.11(b)(3) provides the “metric . . .

TURPPA, v. COUNTY OF MONTMORENCY,, 724 F. Supp. 2d 783 (E.D. Mich. 2010)

. . . L.R. 83.10(b)(3) & 83.11; [Dkt. # 12]. . . .

TOLTEST, INC. v. NORTH AMERICAN SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY,, 362 F. App'x 514 (6th Cir. 2010)

. . . According to local rule 83.11 of the Eastern District of Michigan, companion cases are those cases in . . .

CRUZ- PACKER, v. CHERTOFF,, 612 F. Supp. 2d 67 (D.D.C. 2009)

. . . Cruz-Packer has also moved under Local Civil Rule 83.11(b)(3) for appointment of counsel to assist her . . .

D. HENNEGHAN, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PUBLIC SCHOOLS,, 597 F. Supp. 2d 34 (D.D.C. 2009)

. . . desire the assistance of counsel appointed from the Court's Civil Pro Bono Panel, see Local Civil Rule 83.11 . . .

SCHAGHTICOKE TRIBAL NATION, v. KEMPTHORNE,, 587 F. Supp. 2d 389 (D. Conn. 2008)

. . . . § 83.11(d)(2). . . .

STERN, v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS,, 515 F. Supp. 2d 153 (D.D.C. 2007)

. . . See LCvR 83.11(b)(3) (stating that [w]hen leave has been granted ... for a pro se litigant to proceed . . .

GAVIRIA, v. REYNOLDS, DDS,, 476 F.3d 940 (D.C. Cir. 2007)

. . . R. 83.11(a)(4)(B) (amended 2001)). Patrick A. . . . Amicus maintains that the district court should have set forth the four factors of Local Civil Rule 83.11 . . . After acknowledging that Rule 83.11 was controlling, the district court concluded that a reappointment . . . brevity, the district court’s discussion shows that it considered each of the four factors of Rule 83.11 . . . R. 83.11(b)(3), as amended in 2001, now provides: When leave has been granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § . . .

GOLDEN HILL PAUGUSSETT TRIBE OF INDIANS, v. M. RELL,, 463 F. Supp. 2d 192 (D. Conn. 2006)

. . . . § 83.11. . . . judge on disputed issues of fact, and may also seek review from the Secretary of the Interior, id. § 83.11 . . .

JONES, v. CITY OF ALLEN PARK, 167 F. App'x 398 (6th Cir. 2006)

. . . Eastern District of Michigan Local Rule 83.11 governs the re-assignment of companion cases, stating that . . . R. 83.11(b)(7). . . .

UNITED STATES v. M. HANSEN,, 233 F.R.D. 665 (S.D. Cal. 2005)

. . . See Local Rule 83.11(a). 6. . . .

In DELPHI ERISA LITIGATION, 230 F.R.D. 496 (E.D. Mich. 2005)

. . . LR 83.11(b)(7)(A). . . .

LEVI, v. BROWN WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORPORATION,, 167 F. App'x 225 (D.C. Cir. 2005)

. . . See Local Civil Rule 83.11(a)(4)(B). . . .

FRANK, v. L. L. BEAN INC., 377 F. Supp. 2d 233 (D. Me. 2005)

. . . R. 83.11. By revealing L.L. . . . R. 83.11(d). . . . imposing sanctions upon the Plaintiff for her violation of the confidentiality agreement and Local Rule 83.11 . . .

J. BOWENS, v. AFTERMATH ENTERTAINMENT,, 364 F. Supp. 2d 641 (E.D. Mich. 2005)

. . . District Judge Avern Cohn but was transferred to the undersigned on June 20, 2002, pursuant to Local Rule 83.11 . . .

L. KAHAWAIOLAA C. L. Jr. L. Ka i, v. A. NORTON,, 386 F.3d 1271 (9th Cir. 2004)

. . . . § 83.11(e)(8). . . .

L. KAHAWAIOLAA C. L. Jr. L. Ka i, v. A. NORTON,, 386 F.3d 1271 (9th Cir. 2004)

. . . . § 83.11(e)(8). . . .

J. LORIMER, ESTATE OF LORIMER, v. BERRELEZ,, 331 F. Supp. 2d 585 (E.D. Mich. 2004)

. . . LR 83.11(b)(7). . . .

CONNECTICUT, BLUMENTHAL, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS, M. L., 99 F. App'x 313 (2d Cir. 2004)

. . . . § 83.11(a)(1). This administrative appeal is still pending. . . .