Cases from cite.case.law:

T. C. ON BEHALF OF S. C. v. METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENT OF NASHVILLE d b a v. d b a v. d b a v. d b a, 378 F. Supp. 3d 651 (M.D. Tenn. 2019)

. . . . § 83.15(a). That employee is known as the recipient's "Title IX coordinator." . . .

M. AMBUSH, v. ENGELBERG,, 282 F. Supp. 3d 58 (D.D.C. 2017)

. . . See LCvR 83.15(a) (adopting the Rules of Professional Conduct as adopted by the District of Columbia . . .

SALMERON, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA,, 113 F. Supp. 3d 263 (D.D.C. 2015)

. . . R. 83.15(a) (adopting the District of Columbia Court of Appeals .Rules of Professional Conduct), and . . .

UNITED STATES v. A. ABRAMOFF,, 55 F. Supp. 3d 84 (D.D.C. 2014)

. . . Philip Morris, 312 F.Supp.2d 27, 38-39 (D.D.C.2004) (citing Local Rule 83.15(a)). . . .

HORTON v. MAERSK LINE, LIMITED, A. P. A S,, 294 F.R.D. 690 (S.D. Ga. 2013)

. . . L.R. 83.15. The bar rules prohibit 'conduct intended to disrupt a tribunal,' Ga. . . .

In RAIL FREIGHT FUEL SURCHARGE ANTITRUST LITIGATION, 965 F. Supp. 2d 104 (D.D.C. 2013)

. . . R. 83.15(a). If the Court finds that a violation of the D.C. . . .

LEVENTHAL v. SCHENBERG, 484 B.R. 731 (N.D. Ill. 2012)

. . . L.R. 83.15(a), (b). . . .

In E. LEVENTHAL, E. v., 481 B.R. 409 (N.D. Ill. 2012)

. . . prescribed by Local Rule 7.1, was filed before designation of local counsel as required by Local Rule 83.15 . . .

RSM PRODUCTION CORPORATION, v. FRESHFIELDS BRUCKHAUS DERINGER U. S. LLP,, 682 F.3d 1043 (D.C. Cir. 2012)

. . . R. 83.15(a) (2012), even if the third-party has a financial interest in the outcome of the litigation . . .

HARGER, M. v. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, 560 F.3d 1071 (9th Cir. 2009)

. . . . § 83.15. . . .

HARGER, M. v. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, 569 F.3d 898 (9th Cir. 2009)

. . . . § 83.15. . . .

STEVENSON, v. UNITED STATES, 594 F. Supp. 2d 695 (N.D.W. Va. 2009)

. . . Seibert for initial review and report and recommendation pursuant to Local Rule of Prisoner Litigation 83.15 . . .

MOSTLY MEMORIES, INC. v. FOR YOUR EASE ONLY, INC., 594 F. Supp. 2d 931 (N.D. Ill. 2009)

. . . Local Rule 83.15(a). . . .

F. PAUL, v. JUDICIAL WATCH, INC., 571 F. Supp. 2d 17 (D.D.C. 2008)

. . . See LCvR 83.15. III. Violation Of Rule 1.9 A. . . .

J. DANIEL, v. UNITED STATES, 377 F. Supp. 2d 537 (N.D.W. Va. 2005)

. . . Kaull in accordance with Local Rule of Prisoner Litigation 83.15. . . .

UNITED STATES v. DIMARCO,, 125 F. App'x 87 (8th Cir. 2005)

. . . During the search of Dimarco’s home, the officers discovered 83.15 grams of methamphetamine and drug . . .

UNITED STATES v. LANE LABS- USA, INC. a J. s, 324 F. Supp. 2d 582 (D.N.J. 2004)

. . . are: $69.37 per hour and fraction thereof per representative for inspection and investigation work, $83.15 . . .

UNITED STATES v. PHILIP MORRIS INCORPORATED,, 312 F. Supp. 2d 27 (D.D.C. 2004)

. . . LCvR 83.15(a). . . .

MUNCY, v. CITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS, v., 335 F.3d 394 (5th Cir. 2003)

. . . Pointing to Rule 83.15 of the Local Rules of the U.S. . . . L.R.83.15(a),(c) of N.D.Tex. (emphasis added). However, Rule 83.15 is inapplicable here. . . .

COBELL, v. A. NORTON,, 212 F.R.D. 14 (D.D.C. 2002)

. . . Rule 83.15(a) of the Local Rules of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. . . . .

M. ROEDER, v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, 195 F. Supp. 2d 140 (D.D.C. 2002)

. . . See LCvR 83.12(b) and LCvR 83.15 (incorporating Rule of Professional Conduct 3.3(a)(3)). . . .

CSC HOLDINGS, INC. v. J. R. C. PRODUCTS INCORPORATED, L. L. C. P. Jr. P. Sr. C G a k a, 158 F. Supp. 2d 899 (N.D. Ill. 2001)

. . . Local Rule 83.15(c). . . .

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, v. LAMPI LLC,, 240 F.3d 931 (11th Cir. 2001)

. . . He marked three employees for discharge: Ginger Laudermilk (47.88 percent), Belinda Lowe (83.15 percent . . .

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, v. M. ANTAR, ANTAR, A. M., 15 F. Supp. 2d 477 (D.N.J. 1998)

. . . 450,000 60,000 200,000 25,000 150.000 $ 8.00 $21.00 $12.00 $26.00 $26,375 $33.75 $ 6.02 $2.4 million 83.15 . . .

MORGAN, v. GITTENS,, 915 F. Supp. 457 (D. Mass. 1996)

. . . 211.77 4/9/90 1/13/89-12/28/89 t*/ J H o o $18,276.80 114.23 5/18/90 1/2/90-5/18/90 J H c* o $13,304.00 83.15 . . .

REMO, v. E. ECCLESTONE, Jr., 599 So. 2d 1000 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . that Remo’s problem is of his own making because he did not utilize the procedure set forth in section 83.15 . . .

GOODWALL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY P. v. BEERS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY,, 824 F. Supp. 1044 (N.D. Ga. 1992)

. . . Allowed 124.00 Item 19 Allowed $ 511.50 Item 20 Allowed 1,098.86 Item 21 Allowed $ 473.75 Item 22 Allowed 83.15 . . .

WESCH, v. HUNT,, 785 F. Supp. 1491 (S.D. Ala. 1992)

. . . 0.00% 0.00% Block4I7 54 27 27 100.00% 50.00% 50.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 418 89 74 13 100.00% 83.15% . . .

LARRY P. P. v. RILES,, 495 F. Supp. 926 (N.D. Cal. 1979)

. . . 15.24 29.54 40.2 (39/97) 15.9 Los Angeles Unified 24.08 50.1 50.7 (604/1192) 25.4 Oakland Unified 67.11 83.15 . . .

KALVAR CORPORATION v. UNITED STATES, 587 F.2d 49 (Ct. Cl. 1978)

. . . This figure includes $83.15 for out-of-pocket expenses incurred by counsel in the preparation of the . . . Although defendant questions whether all of the $83.15 was spent in connection with the supplemental . . .

KALVAR CORPORATION v. THE UNITED STATES, 218 Ct. Cl. 433 (Ct. Cl. 1978)

DREWRY v. THOMPSON DOOR COMPANY,, 47 Fla. Supp. 177 (Broward Cty. Cir. Ct. 1978)

. . . doorskins was to intervene in the distress proceedings commenced earlier by defendants as permitted by §83.15 . . . Drewry had no obligation to intervene in Case No. 76-14792 as permitted by §83.15, Florida Statutes, . . .

JOHNSON v. RIVERSIDE HOTEL, INC. a, 399 F. Supp. 1138 (S.D. Fla. 1975)

. . . (Florida’s Distress Statutes §§ 83.08, 83.09, 83.11-83.15, 83.18 and 83.19 were declared unconstitutional . . .

STROEMER, a v. L. SHEVIN,, 399 F. Supp. 993 (S.D. Fla. 1973)

. . . issue in this cause is whether the Florida Distress Statutes, 83.08, 83.09, 83.11, 83.12, 83.13, 83.14, 83.15 . . .

ATLANTA SAINT ANDREWS BAY RY. CO. v. UNITED STATES, 104 F. Supp. 193 (M.D. Ala. 1952)

. . . the potential rail or truck haul to the ultimate consumer point, so that now the larger part, about 83.15% . . .

THE CLEVECO. THE ADMIRAL. CLEVELAND TANKERS, v. SZWED SAME v. ROCKS, 154 F.2d 605 (6th Cir. 1946)

. . . briefs cite the following Coast Guard Regulations (Great Lakes: General Rules and Regulations Section 83.15 . . .

G. Jr. v. O. H. M. C. Co-, 141 Fla. 832 (Fla. 1940)

. . . obtained credit but which was not delivered by’ him . to the person shown as purchaser on the ticket____ $83.15 . . .

FIDELITY STORAGE WAREHOUSE CO., 2 B.T.A. 371 (B.T.A. 1925)

. . . Cash-$725. 44 Petty cash-83.15 $808. 59 Bills receivable. 37, 650. 00 69. 65 37, 719. 65 Accounts receivable . . . Petty cash_ 83.15 ■-- $933, 331. 71 LIABILITIES. 20. . . .

TITLE GUARANTY TRUST CO. v. PUGET SOUND ENGINE WORKS, 163 F. 168 (9th Cir. 1908)

. . . towboat company entered into the cost of the construction of the steamer; that the balance due is $83.15 . . .

LOEWENSTEIN v. MAXWELL, 15 F. Cas. 784 (C.C.S.D.N.Y. 1852)

. . . appraised value exceeding the invoice price more than ten per cent., an additional duty, amounting to $83.15 . . .

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)