The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE

Chapter 83
LANDLORD AND TENANT

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 83.14

83.14 Replevy of distrained property.—The property distrained may be restored to the defendant at any time on the defendant’s giving bond with surety to the sheriff levying the writ. The bond shall be approved by such sheriff; made payable to plaintiff in double the value of the property levied on, with the value to be fixed by the sheriff; and conditioned for the forthcoming of the property restored to abide the final order of the court. It may be also restored to defendant on defendant’s giving bond with surety to be approved by the sheriff making the levy conditioned to pay the plaintiff the amount or value of the rental or advances which may be adjudicated to be payable to plaintiff. Judgment may be entered against the surety on such bonds in the manner and with like effect as provided in s. 76.31.

History.—s. 3, ch. 3131, 1879; RS 1766; s. 1, ch. 4408, 1895; RGS 3561; CGL 5425; s. 34, ch. 67-254; s. 16, ch. 82-66; s. 9, ch. 83-255; s. 434, ch. 95-147.

F.S. 83.14 on Google Scholar

F.S. 83.14 on Casetext

Amendments to 83.14

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 83.14

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 83.14.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

IN RE SHARIF,, 541 B.R. 681 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 2015)

. . . has sought and received permission to appear in this case pursuant to the District Court’s Local Rule 83.14 . . .

HARGER, M. v. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, 560 F.3d 1071 (9th Cir. 2009)

. . . . §§ 83.1-83.9, 83.12-83.14. . . .

HARGER, M. v. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, 569 F.3d 898 (9th Cir. 2009)

. . . . §§ 83.1-83.9, 83.12-83.14. . . .

In F. NASCIMENTO, F. v., 270 F. App'x 660 (9th Cir. 2008)

. . . Pursuant to Montana District Court Local Rule 83.14(d), the district court properly based its suspension . . .

LASAR, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY,, 399 F.3d 1101 (9th Cir. 2005)

. . . First, Local Rule 83.14(a) provides that “[n]othing contained in this Rule shall be construed to limit . . . Local Rule 83.14(b). . . . Thus, Rule 83.14 preserves the presiding judge’s inherent authority to impose sanctions and to hold an . . . Local Rule 83.14(b) provides that "[a]n attorney may be subject to disciplinary action ... for [a] .. . . . The district court did not rely on Local Rule 83.14 when it held Sutter in contempt and revoked his pro . . .

LASAR, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY,, 239 F. Supp. 2d 1022 (D. Mont. 2003)

. . . . § 1927; and (3) Local Rule 83.14(b) & (c). . . . Local Rules Local Rule 83.14(b) & (c) allows the Court to sanction an attorney for violating any court . . . Sanctions (5) In this case, an award of sanctions under my inherent authority and L.R. 83.14(b) & (c) . . .

EAST INC. a d b a v. MARGOLIS, d b a, 702 So. 2d 286 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . See §§ 78.068(3), (4), 83.12, 83.14, Fla. Stat. (1995). . . .

E. HOWARD, v. ALLSTATE INDEMNITY COMPANY,, 176 F.R.D. 265 (E.D. Tenn. 1997)

. . . Florida; L.R. 47.1(b), Southern District of Florida; L.R. 250-2(a), Northern District of Georgia; L.R. 83.14 . . .

In E. BEESLEY L. E. BEESLEY L. v. M. BURKE,, 212 B.R. 4 (Bankr. D. Me. 1997)

. . . In October, November, and December, they were billed another $172.63, $45.25, and $83.14, respectively . . .

L. WEAVER, v. W. CLARKE, J. L. G. O. W. F. Jr. L. WEAVER, v. W. CLARKE, J. L. G. O. W. F. Jr., 120 F.3d 852 (8th Cir. 1997)

. . . portion of the amounts claimed for attorney fees and expenses because of his noncompliance with Rule 83.14 . . .

L. WEAVER, v. CLARKE,, 933 F. Supp. 831 (D. Neb. 1996)

. . . of allowable hours as I am persuaded that many of the objections premised on noncompliance with NELR 83.14 . . . in a particular expense item, and for this reason the request does not specifically comply with NELR 83.14 . . .

KLINGER, v. NEBRASKA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES,, 902 F. Supp. 1036 (D. Neb. 1995)

. . . NELR §§ 54.3 & 83.14 (West 1995). . . .

El TABECH, v. GUNTER, LUNA, v. CLARKE, PIERCE, v. CLARKE, JENSEN, v. GUNTER,, 869 F. Supp. 1446 (D. Neb. 1994)

. . . See NELR § 83.14, at 785-86 (West 1994). . . . As its title implies, NELR § 83.14 is a set of “guidelines.” . . . NELR § 83.14(a)(1). . . . NELR § 83.14(b)(1). . . . The examples which follow each of these subsections of NELR § 83.14 are not, however, intended to be . . .

UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, v. UNITED TRANSPORTATION UNION C T, 860 F. Supp. 676 (D. Neb. 1994)

. . . In accordance with NELR 83.14, the defendants may make application for reasonable attorney fees, supported . . .

Jo BIECK, v. ALLIED MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a k a, 859 F. Supp. 381 (D. Neb. 1994)

. . . See NELR 83.14. . . .

E. SORICH, v. E. SHALALA,, 838 F. Supp. 1354 (D. Neb. 1993)

. . . with EAJA, the fee-application requirements set forth in the Local Rules of Practice, NELR §§ 54.3 and 83.14 . . .

H. GOODMAN, v. BRASSERIA LA CAPANNINA, INC., 602 So. 2d 1245 (Fla. 1992)

. . . In Phillips we held sections 83.11, 83.12 and 83.14-.19, Florida Statutes (1975), unconstitutional as . . .

WESCH, v. HUNT,, 785 F. Supp. 1491 (S.D. Ala. 1992)

. . . Total Asian/PI COUNTY COURTHOUSE 5,569 100.00% 4,630 83.14%. 594 10.67% 10 0.18% 315 5.66% CLARA VERNA-TOWERS . . .

v., 13 Ct. Int'l Trade 584 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1989)

. . . FTC noted that the original antidumping investigation revealed dumping margins ranging from .057 to 83.14 . . .

ASOCIACION COLOMBIANA EXPORTADORES FLORES ASOCOFLORES v. UNITED STATES,, 717 F. Supp. 847 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1989)

. . . FTC noted that the original antidumping investigation revealed dumping margins ranging from .057 to 83.14 . . .

STATE v. MILLER,, 373 So. 2d 677 (Fla. 1979)

. . . . §§ 83.11, 83.12, 83.14-.19, Fla.Stat. (1975). . §§ 77.031, 77.04, 77.06, 77.07, Fla.Stat. (1975). . . . .

B. PHILLIPS R. d b a A H v. GUIN HUNT, INC., 344 So. 2d 568 (Fla. 1977)

. . . prejudgment procedures, we find that the circuit court was correct in ruling that Sections 83.11, 83.12, and 83.14 . . . Today, we find that Sections 83.11, 83.12, and 83.14-.19, Florida Statutes, are unconstitutional because . . . For the reasons stated herein, the judgment of the circuit court declaring Sections 83.11, 83.12 and 83.14 . . .

STROEMER, a v. L. SHEVIN,, 399 F. Supp. 993 (S.D. Fla. 1973)

. . . The issue in this cause is whether the Florida Distress Statutes, 83.08, 83.09, 83.11, 83.12, 83.13, 83.14 . . . giving a similar bond to the officer levying the distress writ payable to the Plaintiff-Landlord (F.S.83.14 . . .

LOVERIDGE, v. BUEHLER,, 12 Fla. Supp. 120 (Brevard Cty. Cir. Ct. 1957)

. . . further provides that if the property has been restored to the defendant as provided for in section 83.14 . . . except where the property has been delivered to the defendant under bond, as provided for in section 83.14 . . .

CUMMINS, v. CARTERET BROADCASTING COMPANY,, 137 F. Supp. 547 (E.D.N.C. 1956)

. . . 8/19/50 93 hrs. 7.08 119.44 126.52 8/26/50 93 hrs. 7.08 119.44 126.52 9/ 2/50 89 hrs. 20 min. 7.08 83.14 . . .

LENT TRAFFIC CO. v. GOULD, 2 F.2d 554 (3d Cir. 1924)

. . . . §§ 8311, 83.14) the libelant is barred from recovery, which sections refer to contracts of employment . . .