Florida/Georgia Personal Injury & Workers Compensation

You're probably overthinking it. Call a lawyer.

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 39.011 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 39.011 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 39.011 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 39.011

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title V
JUDICIAL BRANCH
Chapter 39
PROCEEDINGS RELATING TO CHILDREN
View Entire Chapter
39.011 Immunity from liability.—
(1) In no case shall employees or agents of the department or a social service agency acting in good faith be liable for damages as a result of failing to provide services agreed to under the case plan unless the failure to provide such services occurs as a result of bad faith or malicious purpose or occurs in a manner exhibiting wanton and willful disregard of human rights, safety, or property.
(2) The inability or failure of the department or of a social service agency or the employees or agents of the social service agency to provide the services agreed to under the case plan shall not render the state or the social service agency liable for damages unless such failure to provide services occurs in a manner exhibiting wanton or willful disregard of human rights, safety, or property.
(3) A member or agent of a citizen review panel acting in good faith is not liable for damages as a result of any review or recommendation with regard to a dependency matter unless such member or agent exhibits wanton and willful disregard of human rights or safety, or property.
History.—s. 9, ch. 87-289; s. 13, ch. 90-306; s. 7, ch. 97-95; s. 21, ch. 98-403; s. 5, ch. 99-193.
Note.—Former s. 39.455.

F.S. 39.011 on Google Scholar

F.S. 39.011 on CourtListener

Amendments to 39.011


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 39.011

Total Results: 154  |  Sort by: Relevance  |  Newest First

Copy

In Re Rjc, 300 So. 2d 54 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974).

Cited 117 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

attention of the courts. First, we note that the new § 39.11(2)(d) provides that when a child is adjudicated
Copy

Dykes v. Hosemann, 776 F.2d 942 (11th Cir. 1985).

Cited 106 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 54 U.S.L.W. 2297

order’s entry appeared to contest it), see Fla.Stat. § 39.-11(3) (1977), or reversal on appeal, see Fla. Stat
Copy

In re the Interest of R. J. C., 300 So. 2d 54 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974).

Cited 104 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 8660

attention of the courts. First, we note that the new § 39.11(2) (d) provides that when a child is adjudicated
Copy

MG v. State, 556 So. 2d 820 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990).

Cited 103 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1990 WL 12008

court had ordered a commitment in the same case. § 39.11(1)(a)1, Fla. Stat. (1987); H.B.E., III v. State
Copy

Gammon v. Cobb, 335 So. 2d 261 (Fla. 1976).

Cited 59 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida

initially enacted in 1955, now appearing as sub-section 39.11(2)(e), Florida Statutes, when any child is adjudicated
Copy

In Re Interest of Camm, 294 So. 2d 318 (Fla. 1974).

Cited 30 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1974 Fla. LEXIS 3949

impliedly passed upon the constitutionality of Section 39.11(2) (a) (4), Florida Statutes, F.S.A.,[1] giving
Copy

Potvin v. Keller, 313 So. 2d 703 (Fla. 1975).

Cited 26 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida

with respect to dependency proceedings under section 39.11(2) (a), Fla. Stat., as we now hold and as previously
Copy

JSH v. State, 472 So. 2d 737 (Fla. 1985).

Cited 25 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 356

juvenile pay restitution to the victim under section 39.11(1)(g), Florida Statutes (1983). We agree and
Copy

Schuette v. State, 822 So. 2d 1275 (Fla. 2002).

Cited 20 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 2002 WL 1338512

1993). [4] In J.S.H. this Court interpreted section 39.11(1)(g), Florida Statutes (1983), repealed by
Copy

Solomon v. McLucas, 382 So. 2d 339 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980).

Cited 16 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal

The grounds for such a commitment as stated in § 39.11(1)(b), Fla. Stat. (1977) were changed by the legislature
Copy

JOS v. State, 689 So. 2d 1061 (Fla. 1997).

Cited 16 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1997 WL 109215

juvenile proceedings. We construed the language in section 39.11(1)(g) to mean that the offense charged did not
Copy

TR v. State, 677 So. 2d 270 (Fla. 1996).

Cited 15 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1996 WL 350171

looked to section 39.11, Florida Statutes (1979). The district court noted that under section 39.11(1)(c)
Copy

GEG v. State, 417 So. 2d 975 (Fla. 1982).

Cited 13 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida

order. The trial judge obviously was aware that section 39.11(3), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1978), did not become
Copy

Noeling v. State, 87 So. 2d 593 (Fla. 1956).

Cited 12 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida

petition should not be granted" as required by Section 39.11(4) (a), Florida Statutes, F.S.A. The petitioners
Copy

Richardson v. State Ex Rel. Milton, 219 So. 2d 77 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969).

Cited 12 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

incarceration until age twenty-one. Fla. Stat. § 39.11(3) F.S.A. In Gault, the United States Supreme Court
Copy

Dept. of Health & Rehab. Servs. v. State, 616 So. 2d 91 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993).

Cited 11 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1993 WL 74946

concur. NOTES [1] Section 39.054 (formerly section 39.11) sets forth the various dispositional options
Copy

Div. of Fam. Servs. v. State, 319 So. 2d 72 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975).

Cited 11 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 15262

its statutory claim to exclusive authority on F.S. 39.11(2)(c), which incorporates F.S. 39.01(9), already
Copy

RMP v. Jones, 419 So. 2d 618 (Fla. 1982).

Cited 11 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida

even though the almost identical language in section 39.11(1), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1980),[2] authorizes
Copy

EJ v. State, 595 So. 2d 282 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992).

Cited 10 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1992 WL 51255

sanction for the offense. Prior to the repeal of Section 39.11, Florida Statutes, by Chapter 90-208, Laws of
Copy

In Interest of DAH, 390 So. 2d 379 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980).

Cited 9 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal

incorrect standard to the evidence before him. Section 39.11(2)(d), Florida Statutes (1977) was the law in
Copy

Fruh v. State, Dept. of Health & Rehab. Servs., 430 So. 2d 581 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983).

Cited 9 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal

changes, adding a new subsection to what was then section 39.11. This subsection provides as follows: In carrying
Copy

F. & F. v. Duval Cnty., 273 So. 2d 15 (Fla. 1st DCA 1973).

Cited 8 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 65 A.L.R. 3d 1217

A. [3] F.S. § 39.01(12) (a), F.S.A. [4] F.S. § 39.11(1), F.S.A. [5] F.S. § 232.02, F.S.A. [6] 20 Fla
Copy

TSJ v. State, 439 So. 2d 966 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983).

Cited 7 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

421 So.2d 780 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982). Similarly, Section 39.11 must be read in pari materia with Section 39
Copy

GH v. State, 414 So. 2d 1135 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982).

Cited 7 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

charge of leaving the scene of an accident. Section 39.11(1)(g), Florida Statutes (1981), provides that
Copy

LJN v. State, 411 So. 2d 1349 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982).

Cited 7 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

determinate period of time in violation of Section 39.11(3) Florida Statutes, and that the placement
Copy

In Interest of JF, 384 So. 2d 713 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980).

Cited 6 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 16888

that by utilizing the former provisions of Section 39.11(1)(d), Florida Statutes (1977), the circuit
Copy

Sheiner v. State, 82 So. 2d 657 (Fla. 1955).

Cited 6 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida

to such rules and discipline of the Court. Section 39.11 F.S.A. The judiciary is one of the three departments
Copy

State v. Interest of SMG, 313 So. 2d 761 (Fla. 1975).

Cited 6 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida

provision found granting power over a parent is Section 39.11(2)(b), paragraph 4, Florida Statutes, 1971.
Copy

JMJ v. State, 389 So. 2d 1208 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

department until the age of 19, not 18. Compare § 39.11(1)(c) with § 39.41(1)(c). Undoubtedly, the delinquent
Copy

CP v. State, 543 So. 2d 867 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1989 WL 55298

committed to the custody of HRS for the offense. § 39.11(1)(a)1., Fla. Stat. (Supp. 1986); T.S.W. v. State
Copy

Dept. of Health & Rehab. Serv. v. Rwk, 556 So. 2d 815 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1990 WL 12002

program under the supervision of HRS pursuant to section 39.11(1)(a), Florida Statutes.[1] The court has not
Copy

Mitchell v. State, 664 So. 2d 1099 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1995 WL 726534

sentence may be and a written order pursuant to section 39.11 may indeed be subsequently filed." Id. at 1016
Copy

Jones v. State, 480 So. 2d 163 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2776

not "caused by his offense" as required by section 39.11(1)(g), Florida Statutes (1983). The Second District
Copy

BD, a v. State, 412 So. 2d 70 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

conflict as the state has requested we do. Under Section 39.11(3), Florida Statutes, the maximum term of commitment
Copy

JSH v. State, 455 So. 2d 1143 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal

mischief,[1] the court, acting pursuant to section 39.11(1)(g), Florida Statutes (1983), ordered the
Copy

In Interest of Jp, 405 So. 2d 497 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21548

maximum penalty provided for the offense charged. Section 39.11(2)(a), Florida Statutes (1977).[1] We do not
Copy

In Interest of Hutchins, 345 So. 2d 703 (Fla. 1977).

Cited 4 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida

et al., Fla., 340 So.2d 1163 (1976). [2] Section 39.11(2)(c), Florida Statutes. [3] Section 39.09
Copy

Rowe v. Wille, 415 So. 2d 79 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

probation as proof of his contemptuous intent. Section 39.11(1)(a)(2), Florida Statutes (1979), states: Should
Copy

Banks v. State, 520 So. 2d 43 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1987 WL 3185

unless he is sooner released by the court. Section 39.11, Florida Statutes (1985). This defendant is
Copy

FB v. State, 319 So. 2d 77 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

its statutory claim to exclusive authority on F.S. 39.11(2)(c), which incorporated F.S. 39.01(9). We there
Copy

KMC v. State, 485 So. 2d 1296 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 11 Fla. L. Weekly 392, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8402

03(1)(e) to award restitution, but relied upon section 39.11(1)(g), which provides that in a juvenile delinquency
Copy

Roberts v. State, 467 So. 2d 439 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 926

view, the words "caused by his offense" in section 39.11(1)(g) do not mean that the offense charged must
Copy

RH v. State, 549 So. 2d 742 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1989 WL 112140

child could receive if he or she were an adult. § 39.11(4), Fla. Stat. (1987); C.P. v. State, 543 So.2d
Copy

AO v. State, 456 So. 2d 1173 (Fla. 1984).

Cited 3 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida

department until the age of 19, not 18. Compare § 39.11(1)(c) with § 39.41(1)(c). Undoubtedly, the delinquent
Copy

RJK v. State, 375 So. 2d 871 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

commitment pursuant to the requirements of Section 39.11(1)(c), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1978). McCORD
Copy

Butler v. State, 543 So. 2d 432 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1989 WL 52147

Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services. See § 39.11, Fla. Stat. (1987). In 1984, apparently after a
Copy

In Re Aw, 230 So. 2d 200 (Fla. 1st DCA 1970).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

jurisdiction as to dependent children is limited by Section 39.11, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., which authorizes
Copy

WN v. State, 426 So. 2d 1206 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

Fresneda differs from the charge of trespass; but section 39.11(1)(g), Florida Statutes (1981), provides that
Copy

JDB v. State, 463 So. 2d 486 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 366

defendant to "indefinite community control." Section 39.11(1)(a) 1, Florida Statutes (1983), provides that
Copy

GWM v. State, 391 So. 2d 738 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

involved here of five years and sixty days. Section 39.11(1)(c), Florida Statutes (1979) provides that
Copy

Thompson v. Dept. of Health & Rehab. Serv., 353 So. 2d 197 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

court correctly construed the provisions of Section 39.11(6), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1977). This section
Copy

In the Interest of CKG, 365 So. 2d 424 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal

Since the end result of proceedings under Section 39.11(d), Florida Statutes (1977), is the permanent
Copy

In Re Smith, 299 So. 2d 127 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

two of the statutory grounds found in Fla. Stat. § 39.11(2) (d), to-wit: the parents had "substantially
Copy

RF v. State, 549 So. 2d 1169 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 1989 WL 118637

instant case, contrary to the requirements of section 39.11(1)(a)1, Florida Statute (1987), there was no
Copy

MVD v. State, 414 So. 2d 599 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

time and in ordering restitution to be made. Section 39.11(3), Florida Statutes (1981) mandates that "[a]ny
Copy

GJV v. State, 637 So. 2d 78 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1994 WL 195495

DCA 1984) (where version of statute in effect, § 39.11(1)(f), provided restitution sanction as part of
Copy

In Interest of JN, 279 So. 2d 50 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

court committed the child under the authority of § 39.11(2)(b), F.S. 1971, F.S.A., to the Division of Youth
Copy

WPJ v. State, 443 So. 2d 424 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal

has been placed in a community control program. § 39.11, Fla. Stat. (1981); M.V.D. v. State, 414 So.2d
Copy

In Re Vd, 245 So. 2d 273 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

available under the former. See F.S. 1969, section 39.11, F.S.A. Because of the important differences
Copy

WR v. State, 462 So. 2d 856 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 235

make restitution. When restitution is ordered, Section 39.11(1)(a)1, Florida Statutes, mandates that "the
Copy

Dupes v. State, Dept. of Health & Rehab Serv., 536 So. 2d 311 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1988 WL 134409

Florida Administrative Code); and whether section 39.11, Florida Statutes, containing special provisions
Copy

JNW v. State, 361 So. 2d 826 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

appellant by the Division of Youth Services. Section 39.11(2)(f), Florida Statutes (1977). AFFIRMED. ERVIN
Copy

ANJ v. State, 554 So. 2d 531 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1989 WL 104008

discipline a delinquent child is governed by section 39.11, Florida Statutes and thus, absent express statutory
Copy

JS v. State, 552 So. 2d 327 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1989 WL 139124

excess of the maximum allowed by law. We agree. Section 39.11(1)(a)1., Florida Statutes (1987), provides in
Copy

OL v. State, 497 So. 2d 971 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2418

expected to pay or make" is within its discretion. § 39.11(1)(a)1, Fla. Stat. (1985). A trial court may not
Copy

Div. of Fam. Servs. v. SR, 328 So. 2d 270 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

precluded from filing a future petition, because Section 39.11(4), Florida Statutes, provides that an order
Copy

Hall v. Florida State Dep't of Pub. Welfare, 226 So. 2d 39 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1969).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5222

F.S.1967, F.S.A. . Section 39.11(5) (a), F.S.1967, F.S.A. . Section 39.11(5) (b), F.S.1967, F.S
Copy

G. E. G. v. State, 417 So. 2d 975 (Fla. 1982).

Cited 1 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1982 Fla. LEXIS 2479

order. The trial judge obviously was aware that section 39.-11(3), Florida Statutes (Supp.1978), did not become
Copy

In Re Smg, 291 So. 2d 43 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

granting specific power over a parent is F.S. Section 39.11(2)(b), par. 4, F.S.A. 1971. Thereunder where
Copy

TSW v. State, 489 So. 2d 1146 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 11 Fla. L. Weekly 981

than the sentence which could have been imposed. § 39.11(1)(a)1, Fla. Stat. (1985); J.D.B. v. State, 463
Copy

In the Interest of A.N.J. v. State, 554 So. 2d 531 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2103, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4992

discipline a delinquent child is governed by section 39.11, Florida Statutes and thus, absent express statutory
Copy

R.H. v. State, 549 So. 2d 742 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2293, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5321

child could receive if he or she were an adult. § 39.11(4), Fla.Stat. (1987); C.P. v. State, 543 So.2d
Copy

A.O. v. State, 456 So. 2d 1173 (Fla. 1984).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 9 Fla. L. Weekly 422, 1984 Fla. LEXIS 3420

department until the age of 19, not 18. Compare § 39.11(l)(c) with § 39.-41(l)(c). Undoubtedly, the delinquent
Copy

C.D.S. v. State, 475 So. 2d 1017 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16019, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2215

indeterminate duration of the sentences was not error; section 39.11(3), Florida Statutes (1983), requires that commitments
Copy

ANE v. State, 156 So. 2d 525 (Fla. 1st DCA 1963).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

relating to the juvenile courts of our state. Section 39.11 provides that, when a child has been adjudicatd
Copy

J.S.H. v. State, 455 So. 2d 1143 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2044, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15059

criminal mischief,1 the court, acting pursuant to section 39.11(l)(g), Florida Statutes (1983), ordered the
Copy

Willis v. Florida State Div. of Fam. Servs., 283 So. 2d 155 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1973).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 6624

proper notice to the parents as required by F.S. § 39.11(5) F.S.A. and therefore the due process clauses
Copy

In the Interest of D. A. W., 240 So. 2d 524 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1970).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

Public Welfare for subsequent adoption under Section 39.-11, Florida Statutes, F.S.A. It does not appear
Copy

A. N. E. v. State, 156 So. 2d 525 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1963).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

relating to the juvenile courts of our state. Section 39.11 provides that, when a child has been adjudicatd
Copy

State ex rel. D. E. v. Keller, 251 So. 2d 703 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1971).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6202

custody of his parents, presumably pursuant to Section 39.-11(2) (a), Florida Statutes, F.S.A. (3) After
Copy

In the Interest of D. A. W., 178 So. 2d 745 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1965).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1965 Fla. App. LEXIS 3689

control of the department for future adoption. See § 39.11(1) (d). Jurisdiction was retained “for the purpose
Copy

In the Interest of T.S.J. v. State, 439 So. 2d 966 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 22725

1982). I also agree with the majority that Section 39.11 must be read in pari materia with Section 39
Copy

D.M. v. State, 550 So. 2d 149 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2445, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5828

included within the restitution ordered under Section 39.11(l)(f), Florida Statutes (1987). (2) Although
Copy

DM v. State, 550 So. 2d 149 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 1989 WL 120854

included within the restitution ordered under Section 39.11(1)(f), Florida Statutes (1987). (2) Although
Copy

T. W. v. State, 338 So. 2d 549 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15740

resolution of the other two points. First, Section 39.11(4), Florida Statutes, provides that a juvenile
Copy

R.F. v. State, 549 So. 2d 1169 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2376, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5569

instant case, contrary to the requirements of section 39.11(l)(a)l, Florida Statute (1987), there was no
Copy

R. J. K. v. State, 375 So. 2d 871 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15865

commitment pursuant to the requirements of Section 39.11(l)(e), Florida Statutes (Supp.1978). McCORD
Copy

In re J. S. D., 156 So. 2d 780 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1963).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

State, Fla.App.1958, 104 So.2d 651; Fla.Stat. § 39.11, F.S.A. The appellant would have us reverse not
Copy

Dep't of Health & Rehabilitative Servs. v. J.T.H., 586 So. 2d 516 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 13961, 1991 WL 200770

empowered to commit the child to HRS pursuant to section 39.11(1); Florida Statutes (1989) and section 39.053(3)
Copy

S.N.D. v. State, 551 So. 2d 604 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2623, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6293, 1989 WL 135398

order in the record meeting the requirements of section 39.11(1), Florida Statutes (1987), and imposing the
Copy

Wolf v. Dep't of Health & Rehabilitative Servs., 588 So. 2d 335 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 11042, 1991 WL 227661

payment for the support of their child under section 39.-11(2), Florida Statutes,1 section 402.33(2), Florida
Copy

Harmon v. Dep't of Health & Rehabilitative Servs., 364 So. 2d 788 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 17049

dependency adjudication meets the requirements of Section 39.11, Florida Statutes (1977). The order appealed
Copy

In the Interest of J.S. v. State, 552 So. 2d 327 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2689, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6461

excess of the maximum allowed by law. We agree. Section 39.11(1)(a)1., Florida Statutes (1987), provides in
Copy

O.L. v. State, 497 So. 2d 971 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2418, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10712

expected to pay or make” is within its discretion. § 39.-11(1)(a)1, Fla.Stat. (1985). A trial court may not
Copy

R.M.S. v. State, 552 So. 2d 301 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2680, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6410, 1989 WL 137749

license pursuant to section 39.11(1)(a), Florida Statutes (1989). See also § 39.11(1)(d), Fla.Stat. (1987);
Copy

D.G. v. State, 516 So. 2d 15 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2598, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10880, 1987 WL 1346

expected to pay the amount of restitution ordered, § 39.11(1), Fla.Stat. (Supp.1986); O.L. v. State, 497 So
Copy

J.S. v. State, 588 So. 2d 593 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 4116

1988); J.S.H. v. State, 472 So.2d 737 (Fla.1985); § 39.11(l)(f), Fla.Stat. (1987). Affirmed. . § 90.608
Copy

C.M.M. v. State, 545 So. 2d 917 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1114, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2378, 1989 WL 45406

aspect of its commitment of a child to HRS. Section 39.11(1) Florida Statutes (1987), provides in part:
Copy

In the Interest of S. M. v. McCormack, 398 So. 2d 511 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19938

program of the department.” (Emphasis added.) Section 39.11(l)(a), Florida Statutes (1979), provides as
Copy

M. V. D. v. State, 414 So. 2d 599 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20089

time and in ordering restitution to be made. Section 39.11(3), Florida Statutes (1981) mandates that “[a]ny
Copy

C.P. v. State, 543 So. 2d 867 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1304, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2965

committed to the custody of HRS for the offense. § 39.11(1)(a)1., Fla.Stat. (Supp.1986); T.S.W. v. State
Copy

G.J.V. v. State, 637 So. 2d 78 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 4788

DCA 1984) (where version of statute in effect, § 39.11(1)®, provided restitution sanction as part of community
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1988).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

program under terms prescribed by the court.3 Section 39.11(4), F.S., in pertinent part, provides:
Copy

O.D. v. State, 561 So. 2d 1259 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 3517, 1990 WL 66206

them to pay $2,500 as restitution, pursuant to section 39.11(l)(f), Florida Statutes (1987), for damages
Copy

M.E.I. v. State, 525 So. 2d 467 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1166, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2028, 1988 WL 47260

possession of the insurance company. In that regard, section 39.11(l)(f), Florida Statutes (1987), provides only
Copy

In the Interest of J.W. v. State, 559 So. 2d 751 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2966

payment up to the parties and counselors. See § 39.11(l)(a)l., Fla.Stat. (1989); see also O.L. v. State
Copy

In the Interest of S. L. D., 394 So. 2d 1072 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 18838

point defense counsel reminded the court that Section 39.11(3), Florida Statutes (1979), had the effect
Copy

E.J. v. State, 595 So. 2d 282 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 2795

sanction for the offense. Prior to the repeal of Section 39.11, Florida Statutes, by Chapter 90-208, Laws of
Copy

Florida Bar, 345 So. 2d 655 (Fla. 1977).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1977 Fla. LEXIS 4095

NOTE The service provided by law is set out in § 39.11(6), Fla.Stat. (1975). IX. CONTEMPT RULE 8.270.
Copy

J.O.S. v. State, 689 So. 2d 1061 (Fla. 1997).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 22 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 118, 1997 Fla. LEXIS 308

juvenile proceedings. We construed the language in section 39.11(l)(g) to mean that the offense charged did not
Copy

Dep't of Health & Rehabilitative Servs. v. INA Ins. Co., 503 So. 2d 986 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 12 Fla. L. Weekly 750, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 12051

restitution on account of a child’s misbehavior is section 39.11(1)(g), Florida Statutes (1985), and that only
Copy

Glee v. State, 539 So. 2d 14 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 14 Fla. L. Weekly 576, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1030, 1989 WL 16148

sentencing Glee as an adult without complying with section 39.11, Florida Statutes (Supp.1986). AFFIRMED IN PART
Copy

G. H. v. State, 414 So. 2d 1135 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20236

charge of leaving the scene of an accident. Section 39.11(lXg), Florida Statutes (1981), provides that
Copy

T.R. v. State, 677 So. 2d 270 (Fla. 1996).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 21 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 268, 1996 Fla. LEXIS 1061

looked to section 39.11, Florida Statutes (1979). The district court noted that under section 39.11(l)(c)
Copy

Dunlap v. State, 433 So. 2d 631 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 19728

an adult may serve for the same offense.” See § 39.11(3). The present case does not involve that statute
Copy

Morris v. Stone, 236 So. 2d 455 (Fla. 4th DCA 1970).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6323

. F.S. Ch. 88, F.S.A. . F.S. § 39.11(1), F.S.A. . F.S. § 39.11(5), F.S.A. . 39 Am.Jur. 634, Parent
Copy

Stanley v. State, 582 So. 2d 140 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6176, 1991 WL 117036

assigned to juvenile services and facilities. . Section 39.11 l(7)(d) provides: (d) Any decision to impose
Copy

J.S.H. v. State, 472 So. 2d 737 (Fla. 1985).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 356, 1985 Fla. LEXIS 3505

juvenile pay restitution to the victim under section 39.11(l)(g), Florida Statutes (1983). We agree and
Copy

Interest of R.D. v. State, 564 So. 2d 590 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 5491, 1990 WL 107754

period of community control was sixty days. Section 39.11, Florida Statutes (1989) and J.S. v. State,
Copy

In the Interest of K.W.G. v. State, 510 So. 2d 1050 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1788, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9663

without written permission from this Court”. Section 39.11(3) Florida Statutes (1985) prohibits a court
Copy

Keller v. State ex rel. Epperson, 265 So. 2d 497 (Fla. 1972).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1972 Fla. LEXIS 3539

his parents, presumably pursuant to Fla.Stat. § 39.11(2) (a), F.S.A. After an extended absence from the
Copy

State ex rel. Jannoni v. Yergey, 188 So. 2d 833 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1966).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 5126

jurisdiction specifically granted to it under F.S.A. § 39.11. A rule nisi was- issued by this court, and the
Copy

M. W. B. v. State, 335 So. 2d 10 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 13845

resolve the issues on a jurisdictional basis.2 F.S. 39.11(4) provides that “any commitment to the Division
Copy

G.R. v. State, 564 So. 2d 207 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4951, 1990 WL 95475

stand as restitution cannot be ordered under Section 39.11(l)(f), Florida Statutes (1989) where, as here
Copy

In the Interest of T.T. v. State, 472 So. 2d 556 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1713, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14937

commitment subsequently imposed was, as required by Section 39.-11(1)(c), Florida Statutes (1983), for an indeterminate
Copy

W.P.J. v. State, 443 So. 2d 424 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11244

has been placed in a community control program. § 39.11, Fla.Stat. (1981); M.V.D. v. State, 414 So.2d 599
Copy

In the Interest of V. D., 245 So. 2d 273 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1971).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6892

available under the former. See F.S. 1969, section 39.11, F.S.A. Because of the important differences
Copy

W.R. v. State, 462 So. 2d 856 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 235, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12119

make restitution. When restitution is ordered, Section 39.11(l)(a)l, Florida Statutes, mandates that “the
Copy

In the Interest of G. K. L., 194 So. 2d 36 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1967).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 5215

subsequent to the order appealed. See Fla.Stat.1965, § 39.11(6), F.S.A. Affirmed.
Copy

In the Interest of A. W., 230 So. 2d 200 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1970).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 7003

jurisdiction as to dependent children is limited by Section 39.11, Florida Statutes, F. S.A., which authorizes
Copy

W.N. v. State, 426 So. 2d 1206 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 19032

Fresneda differs from the charge of trespass; but section 39.11(l)(g), Florida Statutes (1981), provides that
Copy

J.D.B. v. State, 463 So. 2d 486 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 366, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14106

defendant to “indefinite community control.” Section 39.11(l)(a) 1, Florida Statutes (1983), provides that
Copy

M.G. v. State, 556 So. 2d 820 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 860

court had ordered a commitment in the same case. § 39.11(1)(a)1, Fla.Stat. (1987); H.B.E., III v. State
Copy

Provost v. State, 291 So. 2d 43 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7822

granting specific power over a parent is F.S. Section 39.11 (2) (b), par. 4, F.S. A. 1971. Thereunder where
Copy

P.L.W. v. State, 428 So. 2d 699 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 18645

HRS or reaches nineteen (19) years of age. Section 39.11(l)(c), Florida Statutes (1981). After having
Copy

K.M.C. v. State, 485 So. 2d 1296 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 11 Fla. L. Weekly 392, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6413

03(l)(e) to award restitution, but relied upon section 39.11(l)(g), which provides that in a juvenile delinquency
Copy

G. W. M. v. State, 391 So. 2d 738 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17908

involved here of five years and sixty days. Section 39.11(l)(c), Florida Statutes (1979) provides that
Copy

In the Interest of T.D.B. v. Kirk, 468 So. 2d 234 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 30, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16711

of delinquency. See, section 39.-09(3) and section 39.11, Florida Statutes (1983), and Florida Rule of
Copy

Maurice v. Montgomery, 390 So. 2d 1241 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 18195

Health and Rehabilitative Services, pursuant to § 39.11, Florida Statutes. Therefore, we construe the word
Copy

State ex rel. Singleton v. Walters, 158 So. 2d 513 (Fla. 1963).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida

of the Juvenile Court of St. Johns County. Section 39.11(3), Florida Statutes, F.S.A. The background
Copy

Meredith v. Smith, 515 So. 2d 1386 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1987 WL 2331

DOROTHY SMITH, until further order of this Court. Section 39.11 deals with delinquency proceedings, and the
Copy

Smith v. Florida State Dep't of Health & Rehabilitative Servs., 299 So. 2d 127 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 8801

two of the statutory grounds found in Fla.Stat. § 39.-11(2) (d), to-wit: the parents had “substantially
Copy

Interest of R.D.B. v. State, 404 So. 2d 136 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20923

and Rehabilitative Services (HRS) pursuant to section 39.11(3), Florida Statutes (Supp.1980). At the disposition
Copy

F. B. v. State, 319 So. 2d 77 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 15263

its statutory claim to exclusive authority on F.S. 39.-11(2) (c), which incorporated F.S. 39.01(9). We
Copy

J. W. H. v. State, 402 So. 2d 562 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20853

exceeded the maximum amount allowable under Section 39.11(3), Florida Statutes (1979). See G. W. M. v
Copy

In the Interest of D.W.K., 492 So. 2d 1360 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1743, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 9266

commitments, in pari materia with those of section 39.11, regarding the court’s general powers to permanently
Copy

B. D. v. State, 412 So. 2d 70 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19758

conflict as the state has requested we do. Under Section 39.11(3), Florida Statutes, the maximum term of commitment
Copy

L. J. N. v. State, 411 So. 2d 1349 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19601

determinate period of time in violation of Section 39.11(3) Florida Statutes, and that the placement
Copy

R.L.W. v. State, 467 So. 2d 828 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1071, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13684

control imposed by the trial court is improper. See § 39.11(3), Fla.Stat. (1983), and L.J.N. v. State, 411
Copy

T.S.W. v. State, 489 So. 2d 1146 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 11 Fla. L. Weekly 981, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7465

than the sentence which could have been imposed. § 39.11(l)(a)l, Fla.Stat. (1985); J.D.B. v. State, 463
Copy

In the Interest of M.L. v. State, 578 So. 2d 464 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 3849, 1991 WL 59998

other residential program of the department. Section 39.11, Florida Statutes (1989), sets forth the juvenile
Copy

Russell v. Wanicka, 524 So. 2d 1077 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 13 Fla. L. Weekly 988, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1667, 1988 WL 36062

death or imprisonment in a state penitentiary. See § 39.11, Fla.Stat. (1985). Therefore (the argument goes)
Copy

In re M.S., 429 So. 2d 844 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 19528

the circuit court. Appellant contends that Section 39.11, Florida Statutes (1981), does not permit the
Copy

D. W. J. v. State, 397 So. 2d 722 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19132

question of the statutory interpretation of Section 39.11, Florida Statutes (1979), which provides, in