Florida/Georgia Personal Injury & Workers Compensation

You're probably overthinking it. Call a lawyer.

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 1003.44 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 1003.44 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 1003.44 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 1003.44

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XLVIII
EARLY LEARNING-20 EDUCATION CODE
Chapter 1003
PUBLIC K-12 EDUCATION
View Entire Chapter
1003.44 Patriotic programs; rules.
(1) Each district school board may adopt rules to require, in all of the schools of the district, programs of a patriotic nature to encourage greater respect for the government of the United States and its national anthem and flag, subject always to other existing pertinent laws of the United States or of the state. When the national anthem is played, students and all civilians shall stand at attention, men removing the headdress, except when such headdress is worn for religious purposes. The pledge of allegiance to the flag, “I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all,” shall be rendered by students standing with the right hand over the heart. The pledge of allegiance to the flag shall be recited at the beginning of the day in each public elementary, middle, and high school in the state. Each student shall be informed by a written notice published in the student handbook or a similar publication pursuant to s. 1006.07(2) that the student has the right not to participate in reciting the pledge. Upon written request by his or her parent, the student must be excused from reciting the pledge, including standing and placing the right hand over his or her heart. When the pledge is given, unexcused students must show full respect to the flag by standing at attention, men removing the headdress, except when such headdress is worn for religious purposes, as provided by Pub. L. ch. 77-435, s. 7, approved June 22, 1942, 56 Stat. 377, as amended by Pub. L. ch. 77-806, 56 Stat. 1074, approved December 22, 1942.
(2) Each district school board may allow any teacher or administrator to read, or to post in a public school building or classroom or at any school-related event, any excerpt or portion of the following historic material: the national motto; the national anthem; the pledge of allegiance; the Constitution of the State of Florida, including the Preamble; the Constitution of the United States, including the Preamble; the Bill of Rights; the Declaration of Independence; the Mayflower Compact; the Emancipation Proclamation; the writings, speeches, documents, and proclamations of the presidents of the United States, the signers of the Constitution of the United States and the Declaration of Independence, and civil rights leaders; and decisions of the United States Supreme Court. However, any material that is read, posted, or taught pursuant to this provision may be presented only from a historical perspective and in a nonproselytizing manner. When less than an entire document is used, the excerpt or portion must include as much material as is reasonably necessary to reflect the sentiment of the entire document and avoid expressing statements out of the context in which they were originally made. If the material refers to laws or judicial decisions that have been superseded, the material must be accompanied by a statement indicating that such law or decision is no longer the law of the land. No material shall be selected to advance a particular religious, political, or sectarian purpose. The department shall distribute a copy of this section to each district school board, whereupon each district school superintendent shall distribute a copy to all teachers and administrators.
(3) All public schools in the state are encouraged to coordinate, at all grade levels, instruction related to our nation’s founding fathers with “American Founders’ Month” pursuant to s. 683.1455.
(4) Each district school board shall adopt rules to require, in all of the schools of the district and in each building used by the district school board, the display of the state motto, “In God We Trust,” designated under s. 15.0301, in a conspicuous place.
(5) The hours that a high school student devotes to the Florida Debate Initiative, also known as the Central Florida Debate Initiative, the YMCA Youth and Government program, the American Legion Boys State program, the American Legion Girls State program, or other similar programs approved by the commissioner shall count towards the service work requirement for the Florida Bright Futures Scholarship Program.
(6) To help families, civic institutions, local communities, district school boards, and charter schools prepare students to be civically responsible and knowledgeable adults, the Department of Education shall:
(a) Develop or approve an integrated civic education curriculum that school districts and charter schools must incorporate as part of regular school work in kindergarten through grade 12. The civic education curriculum must assist students in developing:
1. An understanding of their shared rights and responsibilities as residents of the state and of the founding principles of the United States as described in s. 1003.42(2)(a)-(c).
2. A sense of civic pride and desire to participate regularly with government at the local, state, and federal levels.
3. An understanding of the process for effectively advocating before government bodies and officials.
4. An understanding of the civic-minded expectations, developed by the State Board of Education, of an upright and desirable citizenry that recognizes and accepts responsibility for preserving and defending the blessings of liberty inherited from prior generations and secured by the United States Constitution.
(b) Curate oral history resources to be used along with the civic education curriculum which provide portraits in patriotism based on the personal stories of diverse individuals who demonstrate civic-minded qualities, including first-person accounts of victims of other nations’ governing philosophies who can compare those philosophies with those of the United States. This paragraph may be cited as the “Portraits in Patriotism Act.”
(c) Approve integrated civic education curricula submitted by school districts and charter schools that meet the requirements of this subsection.
History.s. 137, ch. 2002-387; s. 39, ch. 2016-237; s. 17, ch. 2017-116; s. 22, ch. 2018-6; s. 2, ch. 2019-150; s. 2, ch. 2021-158.

F.S. 1003.44 on Google Scholar

F.S. 1003.44 on CourtListener

Amendments to 1003.44


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 1003.44

Total Results: 7  |  Sort by: Relevance  |  Newest First

Copy

Jean Fides Alexandre v. U.S. Atty. Gen., 452 F.3d 1204 (11th Cir. 2006).

Cited 37 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2006 WL 940667, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 9157

...Alexandre argues that applying the five-year bar to him produces an impermissibly retroactive effect. 5 We have not yet been called upon to identify the standard of review applicable to a denial of a motion to reopen brought pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 1003.44....
...repealer provisions. St. Cyr, 533 U.S. at 326, 121 S.Ct. at 2293. If an alien pled guilty or nolo contendere to certain crimes before April 1, 1997, he may file a motion to reopen his deportation proceedings in order to seek § 212(c) relief. 8 C.F.R. § 1003.44....
...An alien is ineligible for § 212(c) relief if he has been convicted of an aggravated felony, unless he was convicted between 1990 and 1996 and served less than 5 years of his sentence, or he was convicted pursuant to a guilty plea before 1990. §§ 1003.44(c), 1212.3(f)(4)(i)-(ii). This § 212(c) relief is not available to aliens who were convicted after a trial instead of on a guilty plea. § 1003.44(a)....
...Even if the retroactivity rationale of St. Cyr did apply to IMMACT-90, it would not apply to Alexandre because he did not plead guilty to his drug trafficking charges, but instead proceeded to trial and was convicted by a jury. Even without the five-year bar, the plain language of § 1003.44 also precludes those who did not plead guilty from relief. See § 1003.44(a); § 1212.3(f)(4)(ii); Brooks, 283 F.3d at 1274. III. PETITION DENIED. 7
Copy

Ferguson v. U.S. Attorney Gen., 563 F.3d 1254 (11th Cir. 2009).

Cited 25 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 6945, 2009 WL 824434

...sibility under then INA § 212(c).” Alexandre, 452 F.3d at 1207. 25 proceedings, [Alexandre] was ineligible for § 212(c) relief because of the five-year bar.” Id. Citing federal regulation 8 C.F.R. § 1003.44(a) we also stated that “§ 212(c) relief is not available to aliens who were convicted after a trial instead of on a guilty plea.” Id. Although Alexandre argued that IMMACT-90's five-year bar produced “an impermissible ret...
...Cyr does not apply to IMMACT-90.” Id. Admittedly, Alexandre did state that “§ 212(c) relief is not available to aliens who were convicted after a trial instead of on a guilty 23 We further mentioned that “[e]ven without the five-year bar, the plain language of § 1003.44 also precludes those who did not plead guilty from relief.” Alexandre, 452 F.3d at 1207. 26 plea.” Id....
Copy

De La Rosa v. U.S. Attorney Gen., 579 F.3d 1327 (11th Cir. 2009).

Cited 17 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 18749, 2009 WL 2527296

...the law then in effect.” INS v. St. Cyr, 533 U.S. 289, 326, 121 S. Ct. 2271, 2293 (2001); see also Alexandre, 452 F.3d at 1207 (stating that those who had pled nolo contendere prior to April 1997 could seek § 212(c) relief pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 1003.44)....
Copy

Frazier Ex Rel. Frazier v. Winn, 535 F.3d 1279 (11th Cir. 2008).

Cited 14 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 15546, 2008 WL 2811853

..._________________________________________ (July 23, 2008) Before EDMONDSON, Chief Judge, HILL and ALARCÓN,* Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: This case involves Florida’s Pledge of Allegiance statute, section 1003.44(1), Florida Statutes (“Pledge Statute”), which applies to students at all grade levels from kindergarten to twelfth grade....
...student must be excused from reciting the pledge. When the pledge is given, civilians must show full respect to the flag by standing at attention, men removing the headdress, except when such headdress is worn for religious purposes . . . . Fla. Stat. § 1003.44(1) (emphasis added). * Honorable Arthur L....
... Plaintiff (a minor), through his mother, filed a complaint challenging the constitutionality of the Pledge Statute, both facially and as applied to him as a then-eleventh grade student in a Palm Beach County public high school.1 Plaintiff contended that section 1003.44(1) is facially invalid because it requires that a student obtain a parent’s permission before being excused from reciting the Pledge of Allegiance and stand during the Pledge of Allegiance even if excused....
...whether the statute is facially unconstitutional. 4 The Pledge Statute states, in part, that “When the pledge is given, civilians must show full respect to the flag by standing at attention . . . .” Fla. Stat. § 1003.44(1)....
...Instead, the State argues that this Court—to avoid constitutional problems—should interpret the statute as requiring only students not exempted from the Pledge to stand. 3 The statute requires students who pledge to stand when reciting the Pledge. See Fla. Stat. § 1003.44(1) (“The pledge of allegiance to the flag ....
...Parental Consent Requirement The Pledge Statute states that “The pledge . . . shall be rendered by students . . . . The pledge of allegiance to the flag shall be recited at the beginning of the day in each public elementary, middle, and high school in the state.” Fla. Stat. § 1003.44(1)....
...neutral on the Pledge in the statute’s deference to a parent’s expressed wishes.6 Should a parent request that his child not recite the Pledge—even where the child wishes to recite—the statute provides that the school must excuse the student. Fla. Stat. § 1003.44(1) (“Upon written request by his or her parent, the student must be 5 None of the decisions relied upon by Plaintiff and the district court decide the rights of custodial parents in opposition to the rights of their children becau...
Copy

Frazier Ex Rel. Frazier v. Winn, 535 F.3d 1279 (11th Cir. 2009).

Cited 2 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

...trict scrutiny required when this most fundamental of rights is being violated by the State. Such a “permission” requirement is patently unconstitutional and this opinion puts us at odds not only 1 The pertinent part of Florida Statute § 1003.44(1) reads: The pledge of allegiance to the flag ....
Copy

Frazier Ex Rel. Frazier v. Alexandre, 434 F. Supp. 2d 1350 (S.D. Fla. 2006).

Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38561, 2006 WL 1528791

...ounty School District, Florida. (Am.Compl.¶ 1.) Because of his personal political beliefs and convictions, he does not want to recite, or stand during, the pledge of allegiance each morning. (Am.Compl.¶ 1.) The District Board, following Fla. Stat. § 1003.44(1) [2] , has a policy mandating that students, unless *1353 by written request of a parent, recite the pledge of allegiance....
...dge of allegiance, and to remain seated during the pledge of allegiance, in violation of the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. (Am.Compl.¶ 37.) Count IV, brought against the State Defendants, alleges that Fla. Stat. § 1003.44(1), to the extent it requires a student to obtain a parent's permission before being excused from reciting the pledge of allegiance and requires a student to stand during the pledge of allegiance, violates plaintiff's rights under the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution....
...(Am.Compl.¶ 38.) Count V, brought against all Defendants, alleges that the Supremacy Clause *1356 of the U.S. Constitution, Art. VI, Clause 2, provides that the federal Constitution is "the supreme Law of the Land" notwithstanding any state or local law to the contrary. (Am.Compl.¶ 39.) Frazier alleges that Fla. Stat. § 1003.44(1), and District policies, directly contravene the Constitution as set out above and are therefore pre-empted by the Constitution to the extent of the contradiction. (Am. Compl.¶ 40.) Frazier requests a declaratory judgment that Fla. Stat. § 1003.44(1) and the District policy, to the extent they require a student to obtain a parent's permission before being excused from reciting the pledge of allegiance and require a student to stand during the pledge of allegiance, are unconstitutional on their face and as applied to him....
...t to stand during the pledge of allegiance, as well as a permanent injunction enjoining the State Defendants from taking affirmative steps to ensure that Florida school districts comply with the United States Constitution by not enforcing Fla. Stat. § 1003.44(1), or any school district policies based upon that statute, to the extent they require a student to obtain a parent's permission before being excused from reciting the pledge of allegiance and require a student to stand during the pledge of allegiance....
...judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Rule 12(c), (here, treated as a Rule 56 motion for summary judgment) without the need for an answer to be filed. The District stipulated that, for purposes of this lawsuit only, it, normally following Fla. Stat. § 1003.44(1), has a custom or practice mandating that students, unless excused by written request of a parent, recite the pledge of allegiance....
...ity under Monell v. Department of Social Services, 436 U.S. 658, 694, 98 S.Ct. 2018, 2037-38, 56 LE d.2d 611 (1978), if Frazier is correct in his constitutional claims. Otherwise stated, these parties believe that the constitutionality of Fla. Stat. § 1003.44(1) is dispositive of Frazier's claims: if the statute is unconstitutional, the District's customs and practices based thereon are unconstitutional as well....
...remain standing. (Am.Compl.¶ 18, 26.) See Holloman v. Harland, 370 F.3d 1252, 1268-69 (11th Cir.2004) (verbal censure and singling student out constitutes punishment). These injuries in fact resulted from practices and customs based upon Fla. Stat. § 1003.44(1)....
...Frazier argues that the statute requires non-participating students to stand. He notes that the statute is found in Chapter 1003 of Florida's Education Code, which covers "Public K-12 Education." The specific section itself is located in Part IV— "Public K-12 Educational Instruction;" the title of § 1003.44 is "Patriotic programs; rules," and the section authorizes "district school board[s][to] adopt rules to require" patriotic programs and requires the pledge to be recited in Florida's public schools each morning....
...between "students" and "non-student civilians" as suggested by the State Defendants. A plain reading of the statute confirms that the Palm Beach County School Board's customs and practices are indeed based upon a correct interpretation of Fla. Stat. § 1003.44(1)....
..."Pledge autonomy" has been the state of the law for over 60 years; it is the State Defendants who attempt to create a new rule of constitutional law by requiring prior parental approval of the exercise of First Amendment rights in a school setting. Fl. Stat. ¶ 1003.44(1), to the extent that it requires a student to obtain a parent's permission to be excused from reciting the pledge of allegiance and requires a student to stand during the pledge of allegiance, is unconstitutional on its face and as applied to Frazier in violation of his First and Fourteenth Amendment rights....
...ring the pledge of allegiance. The School Board need not otherwise refrain from disciplining a student for disruptive conduct. Finally, the School Defendants, and anyone acting in concert with them, are permanently enjoined from enforcing Fla. Stat. § 1003.44(1) to the extent that it requires a student to obtain a parent's permission before being excused from reciting the pledge of allegiance and require a student to stand during the pledge of allegiance....
...n removing the headdress, except when such headdress is worn for religious purposes, as provided by Pub.L. ch. 77-435, s. 7, approved June 22, 1942, 56 Stat. 377, as amended by Pub.L. ch. 77-806, 56 Stat. 1074, approved December 22, 1942. Fla. Stat. § 1003.44(1). The school district policy based thereon provides as follows: The Pledge of Allegiance Florida Statutes Section 1003.44 requires the Pledge of allegiance to be recited at the beginning of the day in every public elementary, middle and high school in the state....
...g at attention while the pledge is recited; men must remove any headdress, except when it is worn for religious purposes. (Am. Compl. Ex. 1.) [3] The school district policy based thereon provides as follows: The Pledge of Allegiance Florida Statutes Section 1003.44 requires the Pledge of allegiance to be recited at the beginning of the day in every public elementary, middle and high school in the state....
...cept when it is worn for religious purposes. (Am.Compl.Ex. 1.) The District's Student and Family Handbook provides as follows: Students have a right to be excused from reciting the Pledge of Allegiance upon written request by a parent or guardian (F.S. 1003.44(1))....
...[5] Deference is also inappropriate where there is no agency adjudication at issue. Under Florida's Administrative Procedure Act, an agency adjudication is effected only by a rule, Fla. Stat. § 120.52(15), or an order, § 120.52(7). The State Defendants cite no agency decision or rule construing § 1003.44(1)....
Copy

Frazier v. Alexandre, 555 F.3d 1292 (11th Cir. 2009).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 1309, 2009 WL 166980

consideration. . The pertinent part of Florida Statute § 1003.44(1) reads: The pledge of allegiance to the flag