Florida/Georgia Personal Injury & Workers Compensation

You're probably overthinking it. Call a lawyer.

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 943.1395 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 943.1395 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 943.1395 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 943.1395

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XLVII
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AND CORRECTIONS
Chapter 943
DEPARTMENT OF LAW ENFORCEMENT
View Entire Chapter
943.1395 Certification for employment or appointment; concurrent certification; reemployment or reappointment; inactive status; revocation; suspension; investigation.
(1) The commission shall certify, under procedures established by rule, any person for employment or appointment as an officer if:
(a) The person complies with s. 943.13(1)-(10); and
(b) The employing agency complies with s. 943.133(2) and (3).
(2) An officer who is certified in one discipline and who complies with s. 943.13 in another discipline shall hold concurrent certification and may be assigned in either discipline within his or her employing agency.
(3) Any certified officer who has separated from employment or appointment and who is not reemployed or reappointed by an employing agency within 4 years after the date of separation must meet the minimum qualifications described in s. 943.13, except for the requirement found in s. 943.13(9). Further, such officer must complete any training required by the commission by rule in compliance with s. 943.131(2). Any such officer who fails to comply with the requirements provided in s. 943.131(2) must meet the minimum qualifications described in s. 943.13, to include the requirement of s. 943.13(9).
(4) The certification of an officer who fails to comply with s. 943.135(1) shall be inactive, and the officer may not be employed or appointed as an officer until he or she complies with the provisions of s. 943.135(1).
(5) The employing agency must conduct an internal investigation if it has cause to suspect that an officer is not in compliance with, or has failed to maintain compliance with, s. 943.13(4) or (7). If an officer is not in compliance with, or has failed to maintain compliance with, s. 943.13(4) or (7), the employing agency must submit the investigative findings and supporting information and documentation to the commission in accordance with rules adopted by the commission. The commission may inspect and copy an employing agency’s records to ensure compliance with this subsection.
(6) The commission shall revoke the certification of any officer who is not in compliance with the provisions of s. 943.13(4) or who intentionally executes a false affidavit established in s. 943.13(8), s. 943.133(2), or s. 943.139(2).
(a) The commission shall cause to be investigated any ground for revocation from the employing agency pursuant to s. 943.139 or from the Governor, and the commission may cause verifiable complaints to be investigated. Any investigation initiated by the commission pursuant to this section must be completed within 6 months after receipt of the completed report of the disciplinary or internal affairs investigation from the employing agency or Governor’s office. A verifiable complaint shall be completed within 1 year after receipt of the complaint. An investigation shall be considered completed upon a finding by a probable cause panel of the commission. These time periods shall be tolled during the appeal of a termination or other disciplinary action through the administrative or judicial process or during the period of any criminal prosecution of the officer.
(b)1. The report of misconduct and all records or information provided to or developed by the commission during the course of an investigation conducted by the commission are exempt from the provisions of s. 119.07(1) and s. 24(a), Art. I of the State Constitution and, except as otherwise provided by law, such information shall be subject to public disclosure only after a determination as to probable cause has been made or until the investigation becomes inactive.
2. However, not more than 30 days before the results of an investigation are to be presented to a probable cause panel, an officer who is being investigated, or the officer’s attorney, may review any documents or other information regarding the investigation which was developed by or provided to the commission.
(c) When an officer’s certification is revoked in any discipline, his or her certification in any other discipline shall simultaneously be revoked.
(7) Upon a finding by the commission that a certified officer has not maintained good moral character, the definition of which has been adopted by rule and is established as a statewide standard, as required by s. 943.13(7), the commission may enter an order imposing one or more of the following penalties:
(a) Revocation of certification.
(b) Suspension of certification for a period not to exceed 2 years.
(c) Placement on a probationary status for a period not to exceed 2 years, subject to terms and conditions imposed by the commission. Upon the violation of such terms and conditions, the commission may revoke certification or impose additional penalties as enumerated in this subsection.
(d) Successful completion by the officer of any basic recruit, advanced, or career development training or such retraining deemed appropriate by the commission.
(e) Issuance of a reprimand.
(8)(a) The commission shall, by rule, adopt disciplinary guidelines and procedures to administer the penalties provided in subsections (6) and (7). The commission may, by rule, prescribe penalties for certain offenses. The commission shall, by rule, set forth aggravating and mitigating circumstances to be considered when imposing the penalties provided in subsection (7).
(b)1. The disciplinary guidelines and prescribed penalties must be based upon the severity of specific offenses. The guidelines must provide reasonable and meaningful notice to officers and to the public of penalties that may be imposed for prohibited conduct. The penalties must be consistently applied by the commission.
2. On or before July 1 of each odd-numbered year, the commission shall conduct a workshop to receive public comment and evaluate disciplinary guidelines and penalties. The commission chair shall appoint a 12-member advisory panel, composed of six officers and six representatives of criminal justice management positions, to make recommendations to the commission concerning disciplinary guidelines.
(c) For the purpose of implementing the penalties provided in subsections (6) and (7), the chair of the commission may appoint one or more panels of three commissioners each to determine probable cause. In lieu of a finding of probable cause, the probable cause panel may issue a letter of guidance to the officer.
(d) When an employing agency disciplines an officer and the officer’s employment is continued or reinstated by the agency, the Criminal Justice Professionalism Program shall review the sustained disciplinary charges and disciplinary penalty to determine whether the penalty conforms to the disciplinary penalties prescribed by commission rule, and, in writing, notify the employing agency and officer of the results of the review. If the penalty conforms to the disciplinary penalty provided by rule, the officer and employing agency shall be notified, by a letter of acknowledgment, that no further action shall be taken. If the penalty does not conform to such disciplinary penalty prescribed by rule, the officer and employer shall be notified, in writing, of further action to be taken. The commission shall adopt rules establishing procedures for administering this subsection.
(e) An administrative law judge assigned to conduct a hearing under ss. 120.569 and 120.57(1) regarding allegations that an officer is not in compliance with, or has failed to maintain compliance with, s. 943.13(4) or (7) must, in his or her recommended order:
1. Adhere to the disciplinary guidelines and penalties set forth in subsections (6) and (7) and the rules adopted by the commission for the type of offense committed.
2. Specify, in writing, any aggravating or mitigating circumstance that he or she considered in determining the recommended penalty.

Any deviation from the disciplinary guidelines or prescribed penalty must be based upon circumstances or factors that reasonably justify the aggravation or mitigation of the penalty. Any deviation from the disciplinary guidelines or prescribed penalty must be explained, in writing, by the administrative law judge.

(9) Each person employed pursuant to s. 943.131 is subject to discipline by the commission. Persons who have been subject to disciplinary action pursuant to this subsection are ineligible for employment or appointment under s. 943.131.
(a) The commission shall cause to be investigated any conduct defined in subsection (6) or subsection (7) by a person employed under s. 943.131 and shall set disciplinary guidelines and penalties prescribed in rules applicable to such noncertified persons.
(b) The disciplinary guidelines and prescribed penalties must be based upon the severity of specific offenses. The guidelines must provide reasonable and meaningful notice to officers and to the public of penalties that may be imposed for prohibited conduct. The penalties must be consistently applied by the commission.
(c) In addition, the commission may establish violations and disciplinary penalties for intentional abuse of the employment option provided by s. 943.131 by an individual or employing agency.
(10) An officer whose certification has been revoked pursuant to this section shall be ineligible for employment or appointment under s. 943.131.
History.s. 12, ch. 84-258; s. 8, ch. 85-224; s. 10, ch. 86-187; s. 2, ch. 86-286; ss. 2, 5, 6, ch. 87-186; s. 2, ch. 88-51; s. 5, ch. 91-429; s. 5, ch. 92-131; s. 12, ch. 93-252; s. 1, ch. 94-252; s. 3, ch. 95-408; s. 445, ch. 96-406; s. 319, ch. 96-410; s. 1850, ch. 97-102; s. 4, ch. 2003-278; s. 2, ch. 2004-289; s. 6, ch. 2010-62; s. 30, ch. 2013-116; s. 6, ch. 2018-46; s. 7, ch. 2019-113; s. 10, ch. 2021-241.

F.S. 943.1395 on Google Scholar

F.S. 943.1395 on CourtListener

Amendments to 943.1395


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 943.1395

Total Results: 14  |  Sort by: Relevance  |  Newest First

Copy

Crim. Just. Standards & Training Comm. v. Bradley, 596 So. 2d 661 (Fla. 1992).

Cited 9 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 17 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 193, 1992 Fla. LEXIS 566, 1992 WL 56504

...In this case, section 943.13(7), Florida Statutes (1989), which establishes the minimum qualifications for correctional officers, requires that they "[h]ave a good moral character as determined by a background investigation under procedures established by the commission." As properly found by the hearing officer, section 943.1395(5)-(6) establishes a range of penalties, ranging from the revocation of certification to the issuance of a reprimand, which the Commission may impose on correctional officers found not to have maintained a good moral character....
...t egregious." We find that the Criminal Justice Standards and Training Commission complied with the requirements of section 120.57(1)(b)10 and, in rejecting the recommended penalty, properly increased the penalty within its statutory authority under section 943.1395(5)-(6)....
...Department of Professional Regulation, Division of Real Estate, 568 So.2d 970 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990), to the extent they conflict with this opinion. It is so ordered. SHAW, C.J., and McDONALD, BARKETT, GRIMES, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur. NOTES [1] Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. [2] Section 943.1395(5)-(6), Florida Statutes (1989), reads, in pertinent part, as follows: (5) The commission shall revoke the certification of any officer who is not in compliance with the provisions of s....
Copy

Wills v. Florida Elections Com'n, 955 So. 2d 61 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 4899, 2007 WL 980727

...igation and discipline before the Criminal Justice Standards and Training Commission or through WPBPD internal proceedings. The Criminal Justice Standards and Training Commission is the professional board that regulates law enforcement officers. See § 943.1395, Fla. Stat. Section 943.1395 establishes standards for law enforcement employment, certification, revocation, suspension and investigation. See id. Section 943.1395(5), Florida Statutes, provides: (5) The employing agency must conduct an internal investigation if it has cause to suspect that an officer is not in compliance with, or has failed to maintain compliance with, s....
...943.13(4) or (7), the employing agency must submit the investigative findings and supporting information and documentation to the commission in accordance with rules adopted by the commission. The commission may inspect and copy an employing agency's records to ensure compliance with this subsection. Id. (emphasis added). Section 943.1395(7), Florida Statutes, provides: (7) Upon a finding by the commission that a certified officer has not maintained good moral character, the definition of which has been adopted by rule and is established as a statewide standard, as required by s....
Copy

In Re Stand. Jury Instructions in Crim. Cases-instructions 7.8, 7.8(a), & 11.1-11.6(a), 190 So. 3d 1055 (Fla. 2016).

Cited 1 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 2016 WL 1460708

...depending on the charging document and the evidence. Element 3g: See s. §§ 943.10(1), (2), (3), (6), (7), (8), (9), Fla. Stat., for the definition of a law enforcement officer, correctional officer, or correctional probation officer who must be either certified pursuant to s. § 943.1395, Fla....
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1995).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

...In the instant situation, the suspended officer may not make arrests, may not carry a gun and has been relieved of all police powers associated with carrying out his duties as a law enforcement officer for the city. While the suspended officer apparently remains certified pursuant to section 943.1395 , Florida Statutes, he may not exercise any police powers during his suspension....
Copy

Fraternal Order of Police, Gator, etc. v. City of Gainesville, Florida, 148 So. 3d 798 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2014 WL 4695131

...nothing precludes an officer who is the subject of an alleged violation occurring after the investigation is complete from filing an internal affairs complaint against the investigator or agency official who committed the violation. See also § 943.1395(6)(a), Fla....
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1986).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

with certain exceptions not relevant herein. Section 943.1395, F.S., as amended by ch. 86-187. If an auxiliary
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1991).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

A. Butterworth Attorney General RAB/tls 1 Section 943.1395, F.S., contains provisions for the certification
Copy

Short v. Florida Dep't of Law Enf't, Crim. Just., Standards & Training Comm'n, 589 So. 2d 364 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 11403, 1991 WL 231655

...The hearing officer’s findings of fact noted that Farrow “continues to work as a guard at Florida State Prison. There was no indication that petitioner intends to take any action affecting Mr. Farrow’s certification as a law enforcement officer.” The hearing officer concluded as a matter of law that according to section 943.1395(6), Florida Statutes (Supp.1988), “petitioner is authorized (but not required) to take action ranging from a reprimand to suspension.” The hearing officer .made the following recommendation: “Particularly in light of the treatment petitioner has accorded Mr....
...rimand the respondent.” The Assistant General Counsel for the Commission filed exceptions to the recommended order. The exceptions were (1) the conclusion of law that the penalty range was from reprimand to suspension is incorrect because sections 943.1395(5)....
...Criminal Justice Standards and Training *366 Comm’n, 577 So.2d 638 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991) (citing Bernal v. Department of Professional Regulation, 517 So.2d 113 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), approved, 531 So.2d 967 (Fla.1988)). The Commission answers that it did not abuse its discretion by interpreting subsections 943.1395(5) and (6) to authorize revocation of an officer’s certification for a violation of section 943.13(7), especially since F.A.C....
...t with the seriousness of the offense. We do not know and will not presume whether the hearing officer would have recommended a reprimand if he had known the penalties included revocation. Other permissible penalties include retraining or probation. Section 943.1395(6), Florida Statutes (Supp.1988)....
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 2008).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

...on, you have written on the commission's behalf to request my opinion on substantially the following questions: 1. What is a "completed report of the disciplinary or internal affairs investigation from the employing agency" as that phrase is used in section 943.1395 (6)(a), Florida Statutes? 2....
...in the Department of Law Enforcement 1 and is the body charged with the responsibility to "[e]stablish uniform minimum employment standards for the various criminal justice disciplines" and "[c]ertify, and revoke the certification of, officers[.]" 2 Section 943.1395 (1), Florida Statutes, provides that the commission certifies, pursuant to procedures established by administrative rule, "any person for employment or appointment as an officer[.]" As required by this section, the commission is also...
...Rule 11B-27.004 , Florida Administrative Code, adopted by the Florida Department of Law Enforcement, outlines the procedures for a probable cause determination by the commission and states: "At the conclusion of the preliminary investigation and when the reports and documents are received as directed by Sections 943.139 and 943.1395 , F.S., a determination of probable cause shall be made before the Commission initiates proceedings to take disciplinary action against the certification of an officer." Section 943.139 , Florida Statutes, requires an employing agency to imm...
...etirement, or voluntary or involuntary extended leave of absence of the officer. A copy of the completed report of the disciplinary or internal affairs investigation must be forwarded to the commission for a probable cause determination. Pursuant to section 943.1395 (6)(a), Florida Statutes, the commission is required to revoke the certification of any officer who is found not to be in compliance with these statutory requirements or who intentionally executed a false affidavit: "The commission s...
...n of its investigation of a complaint begins to run after the completed report is received. My research has revealed no case law on this matter, nor have you brought any to my attention. This language was added to the statute through an amendment to section 943.1395 , Florida Statutes, in 1995. 8 Legislative history surrounding the adoption of this amendment indicates that the Legislature intended that "any investigation by the commission related to the termination of an officer must be completed within 6 months[.]" The amendment to section 943.1395 was described as follows: "Section 3 amends s. 943.1395 , F.S., to require the commission to complete an investigation within 6 months when the investigation may result in the revocation of an officer's certification....
...." 9 One of the sponsors of the bill, Representative Arnall, advised a House committee hearing the bill that "this also has a limitation for 6 months for the investigation — in other words, you can't continue that process forever and ever." 10 Based on the language of section 943.1395 (5), Florida Statutes, when read together with Rule 11B-27.004 , Florida Administrative Code, and the clear intent of the Legislature that this process be conducted in a timely manner, it is my opinion that a "completed report of the disciplinary or internal affairs investigation from the employing agency" as that phrase is used in section 943.1395 (6)(a), Florida Statutes, refers to the report submitted by the employing agency to the Criminal Justice Standards and Training Commission pursuant to section 112.533 (2)(a), Florida Statutes....
...11 Question Two You have also asked whether the Criminal Justice Standards and Training Commission is authorized to take action against an officer's certification if it has not completed its investigation within the six-month time period provided in section 943.1395 (6)(a), Florida Statutes....
...Officers must obey the statutes until a court with appropriate jurisdiction determines otherwise. 13 Finally, if any reasonable doubt exists as to the lawful existence of a particular power that is being exercised, the further exercise of the power should be arrested. 14 Section 943.1395 (6)(a), Florida Statutes, specifically provides that "[a]ny investigation initiated by the commission pursuant to this section must be completed within 6 months after receipt of the completed report of the disciplinary or internal af...
...guage is plain and without ambiguity, it fixes legislative intent and interpretation and construction are not needed. 15 Thus, it is my opinion that upon receipt of a completed report from the employing agency or Governor's office as provided for in section 943.1395 (6)(a), Florida Statutes, the Criminal Justice Standards and Training Commission must complete its investigation within a six month period....
...I would note, however, that Florida courts have held that an agency's failure to meet procedural benchmarks such as investigation deadlines will not prevent disciplinary action unless the delay has prejudiced the employee. 16 If the limitations prescribed by section 943.1395 (6)(a), Florida Statutes, do not provide adequate time for investigation, the commission may wish to work with the Legislature to amend these statutorily prescribed limits....
...pril 25, 1995. The statute also makes provision for investigation of "verifiable complaints" and establishes a 1 year time line for those investigations. 10 CS/HB 491, Tape Recording, House Finance Tax Committee Meeting, April 18, 1995. 11 And see , s. 943.1395 (6)(a), Fla....
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 2006).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

firefighter training and certification. 5 Section 943.1395, Fla. Stat., provides for the Criminal Justice
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1996).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

...Is a police report of the criminal investigation of a police officer a public record if the investigation has been concluded and the State Attorney has decided to prosecute? 4. Is a police report of the criminal investigation of a police officer confidential under section 943.1395 (6)(b), Florida Statutes, if the investigation has been concluded and a copy has been forwarded to the Police Standards and Training Commission? 5....
...A police report of the agency's criminal investigation of an officer is a public record after the investigation has been concluded regardless of whether a copy of the report is forwarded to the Criminal Justice Standards and Training Commission pursuant to section 943.1395 , Florida Statutes....
...riminal investigative information." 6 Alternatively, you ask whether the police report would be confidential as maintained by the police department after a copy has been forwarded to the Criminal Justice Standards and Training Commission pursuant to section 943.1395 , Florida Statutes (1994 Supp.). This section sets forth requirements for certification for employment or appointment and also addresses revocation of the certification of officers. Section 943.1395 (5), Florida Statutes (1994 Supp.), provides that "[t]he employing agency must conduct an internal investigation if it has cause to suspect that an officer is not in compliance with, or has failed to maintain compliance with, s....
...ion in accordance with rules adopted by the commission. Once the commission receives this information it is charged with pursuing an independent investigation to determine whether grounds for revocation of certification exist. 8 Subsection (6)(b) of section 943.1395 , mandates the confidentiality of certain information received by or developed by the Criminal Justice Standards and Training Commission in investigating an officer's conduct....
...termination as to probable cause has been made or until the investigation becomes inactive. . . . Again, the statute contemplates the confidentiality of information held by or developed by the commission in the course of an investigation. Nothing in section 943.1395 would extend confidentiality to this information when it is in the possession of entities other than the Criminal Justice Standards and Training Commission. However, while section 943.1395 (6)(b), Florida Statutes (1994 Supp.), would not independently make the police report confidential in the hands of the police department, the prosecution of the case by the State Attorney's office may, as discussed above, indicate th...
...s had such record sealed or expunged shall not be deemed ineligible for employment or appointment as an officer. * * * (7) Have a good moral character as determined by a background investigation under procedures established by the commission. 8 See, s. 943.1395 (6), Fla....
Copy

McAlpin v. Crim. Just. Standards & Training Comm'n, 155 So. 3d 416 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 20982, 2014 WL 7404018

...ines adopted by the Commission and incorporated into the moral-character rule. We find this issue without merit, but useful to discuss the structure of the moral-character rule. Law enforcement officers are required to maintain good moral character. § 943.1395(7), Fla. Stat. (2006). Florida law requires the Commission to adopt disciplinary guidelines for failure to maintain good moral character. § 943.1395(8), Fla....
...through violation of sections 914.22(1) (witness tampering), 837.012(1) (perjury), and 112.313(6) (misuse of official position), Florida Statutes, or any lesser included offenses, and that an appropriate penalty should be imposed in accordance with section 943.1395(7)....
...nd was determined to get her to change it.” Based on the findings, the ALJ concluded that the Commission had proven by clear and convincing evidence that Appellant had violated sections 914.22(1), *420 837.012(1), and 112.318(6), thereby violating section 943.1395(7) and Rule 11B-27.0011(4)(a) and (b). The ALJ also hedged her findings on witness tampering by finding in the alternative the lesser included charge of witness harassment. For failing to maintain good moral character as required by section 943.1395(7), the ALJ recommended that the Commission suspend Appellant’s certification for eighteen months, followed by two years of probation....
Copy

McNair v. Crim. Just. Standards & Training Comm'n, 518 So. 2d 390 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 13 Fla. L. Weekly 66, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11845, 1987 WL 31985

WENTWORTH, Judge. Appellant seeks review of a Criminal Justice Standards and Training Commission order by which his certification as a correctional officer was revoked pursuant *391 to sections 943.1395(5) and 943.13(4), Florida Statutes....
...a to a felony, improperly converted his plea into a conviction. He further contends that these statutes violate constitutional principles of separation of powers and substantive due process. We find that the Commission’s interpretation of sections 943.1395(5) and 943.13(4) is a permissible agency construction, as the state may legitimately bar from employment as correctional officers those who plead guilty or nolo contendere to felonies....
...nolo conten-dere to the felony of aggravated assault. The trial court withheld adjudication of guilt. Appellee alleged in its complaint that appellant was ineligible to hold a certificate as a correctional officer pursuant to sections 943.13(4) and 943.1395(5), Florida Statutes....
...not eligible for expunction because he had prior adjudications of guilt for misdemeanor offenses. Following a vote by members, appellee entered an order revoking appellant’s certification. Appellant argues that the commission’s interpretation of section 943.1395(5), providing that the commission “shall revoke the certificate of any officer ......
...-13(4). We disagree. A plea of nolo conten-dere or guilty is not evaluated under section 943.13(4) as conclusive evidence of the commission of a wrongdoing. Instead, entry of the plea itself creates noncompliance with section 943.13(4), which, under section 943.1395(5), results in a revocation of certification....
...Southeast Volusia Hospital District, et al., 438 So.2d 815 (Fla.1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 901 , 104 S.Ct. 1673 , 80 L.Ed.2d 149 (1984). We find the Commissioner’s interpretation of these statutes is not clearly erroneous. As to appellant’s separation of powers argument, the foregoing interpretation of section 943.1395(5) is that it states a compulsory ground for ineligibility for certification under section 943.13(4) and does not provide that entry of a nolo plea to a felony is conclusive evidence of the commission of a wrongdoing....
Copy

Raulerson v. State of Florida (Fla. 1st DCA 2025).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

...“continued employment or appointment” as an officer); § 943.139, Fla. Stat. (requiring an employing agency to “immediately notify” the Criminal Justice Standards and Training Commission “of the employment or appointment, or separation . . . of any” law enforcement officer); § 943.1395, Fla....

This Florida statute resource is curated by Graham W. Syfert, Esq., a Jacksonville, Florida personal injury and workers' compensation attorney. For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.