Cases from cite.case.law:

L. ADAMS, Jr. v. STATE, 273 So. 3d 195 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . The State responds that Adams's motion is governed by section 705.105(1), Florida Statutes (2010), and . . . Section 705.105, which the State relies upon, governs the disposition of "unclaimed evidence" and requires . . . Section 705.105 applies where the seized property is "intended for use in a criminal or quasi-criminal . . . If the court determines that Adams's property is subject to section 705.105(1) because it was "unclaimed . . . If the court determines that Adams's property is not subject to section 705.105(1), then section 95.11 . . .

HORVATT, v. STATE, 266 So. 3d 1268 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . Section 705.105(1), Florida Statutes (2011), governs the disposition of unclaimed evidence or tangible . . . Thus, a trial court may deny a motion for return of seized property as untimely pursuant to section 705.105 . . . See § 705.105(1) ; Davis, 198 So.3d at 1072. . . . Here, Horvatt failed to file his motion within the time limitation of section 705.105(1). . . .

COLONIAL PENN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, v. E. PARKER,, 362 F. Supp. 3d 380 (S.D. Tex. 2019)

. . . Under Section 705.105, Subchapter A does not apply to insurance contracts (1) that contain provisions . . . CODE § 705.105. . . . located in Subchapter A, covers Misrepresentations in Policy Applications; however, pursuant to Section 705.105 . . . Code § 705.105, supra. . . .

WATKINS, v. STATE, 230 So. 3d 1244 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . The analysis, though, of this procedural timing issue is informed, if not governed, by section 705.105 . . . shall vest permanently in the law enforcement agency 60 days after the conclusion of the proceeding. § 705.105 . . .

EUGENE, v. STATE, 226 So. 3d 1032 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . filed within sixty days after the conclusion of his ease, and argued it was untimely under section 705.105 . . .

MONESTIME, v. STATE, 220 So. 3d 493 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . Monestime appeals from the trial court’s denial of his motion for return Of property pursuant to section 705.105 . . . shall vest permanently in the law enforcement agency 60 days after the con-clusfon of the proceeding. § 705.105 . . . appeal in 2010, the trial court’s order citing to the untimeliness of the motion pursuant to section 705.105 . . .

M. MIGUEL a k a v. STATE, 209 So. 3d 66 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . See § 705.105(1), Fla. . . . State, 198 So.3d 1070 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016) (holding sixty-day time period under section 705.105 did not . . . Thus, April 7, 2016 constitutes the date of the “conclusion of the proceeding” under section 705.105( . . .

BONIA, v. STATE, 197 So. 3d 1280 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . State properly concedes error in that the trial court did not address the applicability of section 705.105 . . . was seized as evidence to support summary denial of motion for return of property pursuant to section 705.105 . . . .2d 962 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997) (reversing denial of motion for return . of property pursuant to section 705.105 . . .

J. DAVIS, v. STATE, 198 So. 3d 1070 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . See § 705.105(1), Fla. Stat. (2012). . . . shall vest permanently in the law enforcement agency 60 days after the conclusion of the proceeding.” § 705.105 . . .

ADAMS, v. STATE, 193 So. 3d 1106 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . The posteonviction court treated Adams’ motion as filed under section 705.105(1), Florida Statutes (2015 . . . Section 705.105(1) provides: Title to unclaimed evidence or unclaimed tangible personal property lawfully . . .

RIGG, v. STATE, 190 So. 3d 656 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . See § 705.105, Fla. Stat. (2015); Harris v. State, 30 So.3d 674 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010). . . .

R. WILKINS, v. STATE, 182 So. 3d 843 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . . § 705.105(1), Fla. Stat. (2014). . . . Here, the trial’court summarily denied Appellant’s motion as untimely under section 705.105, Florida . . .

CEPERO, v. STATE, 174 So. 3d 469 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . that the sixty-day time period begins to run “after the conclusion of the proceeding” under section 705.105 . . .

K. CASTLEMAN, v. STATE, 165 So. 3d 61 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . The trial court treated the motion as filed under section 705.105(1), Florida Statutes (2014), and dismissed . . .

AREL, v. STATE, 160 So. 3d 104 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . See § 705.105(1), Fla. . . . defendant did not file his petition within sixty days of his criminal proceeding’s conclusion as section 705.105 . . .

GARCON, v. WEST PALM BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT, 112 So. 3d 768 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . because appellant’s motion for return was not filed within 60 days of the final disposition, see section 705.105 . . .

R. BAILEY, v. STATE, 93 So. 3d 518 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . The trial court also found that the motion was untimely because Section 705.105, Fla. . . .

JONES, v. STATE, 42 So. 3d 874 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . Michael Jones appeals from the summary denial of his motion for return of property pursuant to section 705.105 . . .

HARRIS, v. STATE, 30 So. 3d 674 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . 3d DCA 1996) (concluding the matter in which the items claimed concededly were seized); see also § 705.105 . . .

MONSERRATE, v. STATE, 25 So. 3d 1292 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . The circuit court summarily denied the motion, finding that under section 705.105(1), Florida Statutes . . .

DOTTIN, v. STATE, 12 So. 3d 329 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . The circuit court denied the motion because under section 705.105(1), Florida Statutes (2006), the property . . .

T. HAMMOND, v. STATE, 12 So. 3d 252 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . Marquise Hammond appeals the denial of his motion to return property filed pursuant to section 705.105 . . .

POUX, v. STATE, 985 So. 2d 1191 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . In those cases, the issues involved application of section 705.105, Florida Statutes, providing for transfer . . .

SHULER, v. STATE, 984 So. 2d 1274 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . personal property that has been lawfully seized as evidence or pursuant to a criminal investigation, § 705.105 . . . that the money had vested in the custody of the Highlands County Sheriffs Office pursuant to section 705.105 . . . he would be specifically precluded from utilizing the procedure for return of unclaimed evidence, § 705.105 . . . 810 So.2d 573, 574 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002) (holding that upon review of applicable arrest reports, section 705.105 . . .

WILSON, v. STATE, 957 So. 2d 1264 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . Tampa Police Department pursuant to the procedure regarding unclaimed evidence contained in section 705.105 . . . forfeiture proceedings under sections 932.701 to 932.707, or if he seeks relief pursuant to section 705.105 . . . If he seeks relief from the disposition of funds pursuant to section 705.105(1), his claim may be untimely . . .

R. HARKLESS, v. STATE, 975 So. 2d 437 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . .” § 705.105(1), Fla. Stat. (2004). See also Sarmiento v. . . .

STEVENS, v. STATE, 929 So. 2d 1197 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . However, section 705.105(1), Florida Statutes (2004), provides that title to unclaimed evidence or personal . . . But the court concluded that Stevens’ motion was untimely under section 705.105 because his criminal . . .

KORDISH, v. STATE, 934 So. 2d 540 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . As the motion was untimely filed, see § 705.105(1), Fla. . . .

WHITE, v. STATE, 926 So. 2d 473 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . However, section 705.105(1), Florida Statutes (2004), provides that title to unclaimed evidence or personal . . .

WILSON, v. STATE, 924 So. 2d 969 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . Tampa Police Department at the conclusion of the proceeding against Wilson in accordance with section 705.105 . . .

REED, v. CITY OF CLEARWATER, a, 899 So. 2d 343 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . return of property that he apparently filed in his initial criminal proceedings pursuant to section 705.105 . . .

BURDEN, v. STATE, 890 So. 2d 566 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . The trial court treated Burden’s motion as a motion for return of property pursuant to section 705.105 . . . Section 705.105 provides that title to unclaimed evidence or unclaimed tangible personal property lawfully . . .

PONDELLA HALL FOR HIRE, INC. n k a v. C. W. CROFT,, 844 So. 2d 696 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . bars to Pondel-la’s suit, including the statute of limitations, laches, and sections 932.703(3) and 705.105 . . .

L. FORBES, v. STATE, 826 So. 2d 421 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . State interposed the objection that the claim was barred by the sixty day limitation period of section 705.105 . . .

SARMIENTO, v. STATE, 816 So. 2d 826 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . filed within sixty (60) days after the conclusion of the criminal proceeding as is required by section 705.105 . . .

CLOUD, v. STATE, 810 So. 2d 573 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . Cloud alleged that he was entitled to return of the money pursuant to section 705.105, Florida Statutes . . . See § 705.105(1) (stating that title to unclaimed evidence lawfully seized will vest permanently with . . . record to its order, and we cannot determine whether Cloud’s property was seized pursuant to section 705.105 . . . Our review of the arrest reports attached to the trial court’s order confirms that section 705.105 does . . .

VILLARREAL, v. W. MOORE,, 805 So. 2d 988 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . Villarreal sought relief under section 705.105, Florida Statutes after MCI staff refused to turn over . . . Section 705.105 provides for the disposition of unclaimed evidence used in a criminal proceeding after . . . See § 705.105, Fla. Stat. (2000). . . .

CLOUD, v. STATE, 801 So. 2d 964 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . of the trial court denying as untimely his motion for return of property filed pursuant to section 705.105 . . . record to its order, and we cannot determine whether Cloud’s property was seized pursuant to section 705.105 . . .

GONZALEZ, v. STATE, 786 So. 2d 680 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . See § 705.105, Fla. Stat. (2000); McKinnon v. State, 752 So.2d 134 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000). . . .

EIGHT HUNDRED, INC. v. STATE, 781 So. 2d 1187 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . a lawful investigation that has vested permanently in a law enforcement agency pursuant to section 705.105 . . . proceeding or seized as evidence by and in the custody of a law enforcement agency’ ”) (citing section 705.105 . . .

DARMAN, v. STATE, 774 So. 2d 798 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . While section 705.105(1), Florida Statutes (1997), requires that any motion to return seized property . . .

HUGHES, v. STATE, 768 So. 2d 512 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . trial court’s order summarily denying his motion for return of property as untimely pursuant to section 705.105 . . . Nothing in this court’s record indicates that Hughes’ property was seized pursuant to section 705.105 . . .

FRANCIS, v. STATE, 765 So. 2d 228 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . closed by his plea and sentence — well beyond the sixty day jurisdictional period provided by section 705.105 . . .

McKINNON, v. STATE, 752 So. 2d 134 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . trial court’s order summarily denying his motion for return of property as untimely pursuant to section 705.105 . . . Because it is not clear from the record that section 705.105 applies to this case, we reverse and remand . . . See § 705.105. . . .

L. ROMERO- SAAVEDRA, v. STATE, 735 So. 2d 1290 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . We affirm the lower court’s denial of the petition because it was untimely filed pursuant to section 705.105 . . .

DARMAN, v. STATE, 734 So. 2d 552 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . Florida Statutes, section 705.105 (1997), governs the procedure regarding unclaimed personal property . . . shall vest permanently in the law enforcement agency 60 days after the conclusion of the proceeding. § 705.105 . . . the return of his property should not have been barred by the 60 day limitations period under section 705.105 . . .

P. COSTELLO, v. STATE, 730 So. 2d 857 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . Further, section 705.105, Florida Statutes is not void for vagueness, nor violative of procedural or . . .

STEVENSON, v. STATE, 688 So. 2d 962 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . To support this argument, the state relied upon section 705.105, Florida Statutes (1995), which provides . . . , in pertinent part: 705.105. . . . Section 705.105 applies when the state has a legitimate interest in property it has seized. . . . Accordingly, since the property was not seized as evidence or during a lawful criminal investigation, section 705.105 . . .

CRUTCHLEY, v. BREVARD COUNTY SHERIFF S OFFICE,, 688 So. 2d 371 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . Section 705.105, Florida Statutes, vested title in the sheriffs office to unclaimed property 60 days . . . Section 705.105, Florida Statutes reads in pertinent part: 705.105. . . .

STRICKLAND, v. THELMAN,, 665 So. 2d 284 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . may have purchased the jewelry from ill-gotten funds simply does not justify a “seizure” under action 705.105 . . . The Department moved for a summary judgment on the basis of Section 705.105, Florida Statutes (1995), . . . But section 705.105 was inapplicable for two reasons. . . .

DIVE N SURF, INC. s v. ANSELOWITZ d b a d b a, 834 F. Supp. 379 (M.D. Fla. 1993)

. . . . § 705.105. However, neither statute supports defendant’s proposition. . . . Stat.Ann. § 705.105 (concerning legal title and disposition of evidence in court custody). . . .

BUTLER, v. STATE, 613 So. 2d 1348 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . that the property was “lawfully destroyed or otherwise disposed of” in June, 1991, pursuant to section 705.105 . . .

COON, v. STATE, 585 So. 2d 1079 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . We are not unaware that under Section 705.105, Florida Statutes (1989), title to unclaimed evidence in . . .