Florida/Georgia Personal Injury & Workers Compensation

You're probably overthinking it. Call a lawyer.

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 672.102 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 672.102 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 672.102 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 672.102

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XXXIX
COMMERCIAL RELATIONS
Chapter 672
UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE: SALES
View Entire Chapter
672.102 Scope; certain security and other transactions excluded from this chapter.
(1) Unless the context otherwise requires, and except as provided in subsection (2), this chapter applies to transactions in goods and, in the case of a hybrid transaction:
(a) If the sale-of-goods aspects do not predominate, only those provisions of this chapter which relate primarily to the sale-of-goods aspects of the transaction apply, and those provisions that relate primarily to the transaction as a whole do not apply.
(b) If the sale-of-goods aspects predominate, this chapter applies to the transaction but does not preclude application in appropriate circumstances of other law to aspects of the transaction which do not relate to the sale of goods.
(2) This chapter does not do the following:
(a) Apply to a transaction that, even though in the form of an unconditional contract to sell or present sale, operates only to create a security interest.
(b) Impair or repeal a statute regulating sales to consumers, farmers, or other specified classes of buyers.
History.s. 1, ch. 65-254; s. 40, ch. 2025-92.
Note.s. 2-102, U.C.C.

F.S. 672.102 on Google Scholar

F.S. 672.102 on CourtListener

Amendments to 672.102


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 672.102

Total Results: 13  |  Sort by: Relevance  |  Newest First

Copy

Sellers v. Frank Griffin AMC Jeep, Inc., 526 So. 2d 147 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988).

Cited 21 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1988 WL 50148

...and under 15 U.S.C.A. sections 2301-08, the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act (Magnuson-Moss Act). No other theory of relief was alleged. Count I of the complaint as amended alleged that the lease agreement is a "transaction in goods" within the meaning of section 672.102; that appellants assumed their new vehicle would be operable and free of substantial defects, but it was not; that the Dealer had failed or was unable to correct the defects; that such defects are nonconformities and constitute a brea...
...ds at any time in the future." The trial court noted the decision in Capital Associates, Inc. v. Hudgens, 455 So.2d 651 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984), in which the court held that the lease of personal property was a transaction in goods within the meaning of section 672.102 subject to the prohibition against unconscionable clauses found in section 672.302....
...a sale involving the relationship of buyer and seller, as is section 672.608. The court stated that "this case is distinguishable from Capital Associates in that it falls within the language of the phrase, `unless the context otherwise requires,' of Section 672.102......
...ion of section 672.608 in the context of the transaction before us to determine whether the remedy provided under that section may be made available to appellants. Appellants argue that section 672.608 is applicable to this lease transaction because section 672.102, defining the scope of application of chapter 672 governing sales, provides that "unless the context otherwise requires, this chapter applies to transactions in goods," and appellants' lease of this vehicle was a "transaction in goods" as so defined....
...s) will apply to a lease transaction]. We conclude, therefore, that an equipment lease may be a "transaction in goods" subject to the provisions of chapter 672 if the requisite incidents of a sale are present "unless the context otherwise requires." Section 672.102, Florida Statutes....
...[10] The legal incidents of a lease vary significantly from those of a sale, and the parties' unambiguous expression of intent to create only a lease cannot be overturned by this court through legal recharacterization of the transaction. This expression of intent places this transaction squarely within the language of section 672.102 specifying "unless the context otherwise requires." To treat this transaction as a sale by analogy by indulging a very *156 liberal construction of the statutory language, as appellants request, would require that we effectively amend the applicable statutory provisions....
Copy

Suntogs of Miami, Inc. v. Burroughs Corp., 433 So. 2d 581 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983).

Cited 9 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 36 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 557

...led. Therefore, the first issue for our determination is whether the parties' choice of Michigan law should be enforced with regard to that clause. The sale of a computer is a transaction in goods and thus is governed by the Uniform Commercial Code. § 672.102, Fla....
Copy

Armadillo Distrib. Enter., Inc. v. Hai Yun Musical Instruments Manufacture Co., 142 F. Supp. 3d 1245 (M.D. Fla. 2015).

Cited 7 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 93 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 40, 88 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 41, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 150398, 2015 WL 6750813

of the Uniform Commercial Code. See Fla. Stat, § 672.102 (defining the scope of Florida’s U.C.C.); Fla
Copy

Lockheed Martin Corp. v. Galaxis USA, Ltd., 222 F. Supp. 2d 1315 (M.D. Fla. 2002).

Cited 7 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17836, 2002 WL 31103982

...ere to be fulfilled merely as a prerequisite to the performance of the contract). 1. Sales of Goods In this case, the Production Contract involves a sale of goods. Article 2 of the Florida Uniform Commercial Code ("the Code") applies. See Fla. Stat. § 672.102 (2001)....
Copy

Validsa, Inc. v. PDVSA Servs. Inc., 632 F. Supp. 2d 1219 (S.D. Fla. 2009).

Cited 4 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 59162, 2009 WL 2029958

...Defendants Breached Contracts 326, 368, 405, and 757 by Failing to Pay for Goods Delivered Under the Contracts. Plaintiff's breach of contract claims under Counts I, II, III and V of the Amended Complaint are grounded in Article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code ("UCC") as adopted in Florida. See Fla. Stat. § 672.102....
Copy

Excess Risk Underwriters, Inc. v. Lafayette Life Ins., 328 F. Supp. 2d 1319 (S.D. Fla. 2004).

Cited 3 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11218, 2004 WL 1381203

...7; see also Tipton v. Woodbury, 616 F.2d 170 (5th Cir.1980) (describing some of the differences between contract law under Florida common law and the UCC). This dispute is governed by common law, as it does not involve a contract for the sale of goods. See Fla. Stat. § 672.102 (2004) (stating that the UCC's Article 2 only applies to "transactions in goods")....
Copy

Capital Assocs., Inc. v. Hudgens, 455 So. 2d 651 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 39 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 66

...She also stated that she was intoxicated at that time. As an initial matter, we find that the equipment lease at issue here is subject to the provisions of Article II of the Uniform Commercial Code, even though that Article does not expressly apply to leases. Section 672.102, Florida Statutes (1983), provides that "[u]nless the context otherwise requires, this chapter applies to transactions in goods... ." Section 672.105(1), in turn, defines goods as "all things (including specially manufactured goods) which are movable at the time of identification to the contract for sale... ." We hold that the term "transaction" in section 672.102 is broad enough to encompass leasing agreements and that the pieces of equipment at issue here are movable "things" and thus meet the definition of "goods" set forth in section 672.105....
Copy

Allied Shelving & Equip., Inc. v. Nat'l Deli, LLC, 154 So. 3d 482 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 136, 2015 WL 72487

...Allied Shelving’s primary contention on appeal is that the trial court erred by applying the common law of contracts rather than Article II of Florida’s Uniform Commercial Code (“UCC”).1 Article II of the UCC applies only to transactions in goods, see § 672.102, Fla....
Copy

Am. Zurich Ins. Co. v. St. George Crystal, Ltd., 870 So. 2d 243 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 3882, 2004 WL 592426

...Wilson, 419 So.2d 1139 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982) (excluding the applicability of section 672.201 before analyzing the enforceability of a contact under section 725.01). Article 2 of the UCC, as adopted in chapter 672, Florida Statutes, applies to all transactions in goods. § 672.102....
Copy

Gen. Tool Indus., Inc. v. Premier Mach., Inc., 790 So. 2d 449 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 44 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 718, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 5176, 2001 WL 388062

...Harbour Club Villas Condominium, Ass’n, Inc., 419 So.2d 678, 679 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). The construction of the instant contract was resolvable by summary judgment. The interpretation of the parties’ contract is governed by the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), Chapter 672, Florida Statutes (2000). § 672.102, Fla....
Copy

Birwelco-Montenay, Inc. v. Infilco Degremont, Inc., 827 So. 2d 255 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2001 WL 1230557

...the contract is governed by the UCC. The trial court ruled that the contract is governed by the UCC and entered summary judgment in favor of Infilco. The plaintiffs appealed. A panel of this court reversed. The UCC applies to transactions in goods, § 672.102, Fla....
...There is no dispute regarding the terms of the contract. Thus even under the authority relied on by the panel, the BMC case, the question of whether the UCC applies is a question of law for the court. 160 F.3d at 1331. As already stated, the UCC applies to "transactions in goods...." § 672.102, Fla....
Copy

Branch Banking & Trust Co. v. M/Y Beowulf, 883 F. Supp. 2d 1199 (S.D. Fla. 2012).

Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2012 WL 2064570, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79138

Statutes, applies to all transactions in goods. § 672.102, Florida Statutes. Because the Sculley 60' meets
Copy

In Re Edgerton, 186 B.R. 143 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1995).

Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | 1995 Bankr. LEXIS 1275, 1995 WL 534616

...The movant may proceed with its in rem remedies against the following property: a mobile office unit, 12' × 48', unit 195223, serial number 31705. 3. The movant shall not pursue any in personam remedies against the Debtor. NOTES [1] Fla.Stat. § 671.101 (1991). [2] Fla.Stat. § 671.101 (1992). [3] Fla.Stat. § 672.102 (1965)....

This Florida statute resource is curated by Graham W. Syfert, Esq., a Jacksonville, Florida personal injury and workers' compensation attorney. For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.