Florida/Georgia Personal Injury & Workers Compensation

You're probably overthinking it. Call a lawyer.

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 550.3551 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 550.3551 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 550.3551 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 550.3551

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XXXIII
REGULATION OF TRADE, COMMERCE, INVESTMENTS, AND SOLICITATIONS
Chapter 550
PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING
View Entire Chapter
550.3551 Transmission of racing and jai alai information; commingling of pari-mutuel pools.
(1)(a) It is unlawful for any person to transmit, by any means, racing information to any person or to relay the same to any person by word of mouth, by signal, or by use of telephone, telegraph, radio, or any other means when the information is knowingly used or intended to be used for illegal gambling purposes or in furtherance of illegal gambling.
(b) Paragraph (a) shall be deemed an exercise of the police power of the state for the protection of the public welfare, health, peace, safety, and morals of the people of the state, and this section shall be liberally construed for the accomplishment of this purpose.
(c) A person who violates paragraph (a) is guilty of a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
(2) Any horse track or fronton licensed under this chapter may transmit broadcasts of races or games conducted at the enclosure of the licensee to locations outside this state.
(a) All broadcasts of horseraces transmitted to locations outside this state must comply with the provisions of the Interstate Horseracing Act of 1978, 92 Stat. 1811, 15 U.S.C. ss. 3001 et seq.
(b) Wagers accepted by any out-of-state pari-mutuel permitholder or licensed betting system on a race broadcasted under this subsection may be, but are not required to be, included in the pari-mutuel pools of the horse track in this state that broadcasts the race upon which wagers are accepted. The handle, as referred to in s. 550.0951(3), does not include any wagers accepted by an out-of-state pari-mutuel permitholder or licensed betting system, irrespective of whether such wagers are included in the pari-mutuel pools of the Florida permitholder as authorized by this subsection.
(3) Any horse track licensed under this chapter may receive broadcasts of horseraces conducted at other horse racetracks located outside this state at the racetrack enclosure of the licensee, if the horse track conducted a full schedule of live racing during the preceding state fiscal year, or if the horse track does not conduct live racing as authorized under s. 550.01215.
(a) All broadcasts of horseraces received from locations outside this state must comply with the provisions of the Interstate Horseracing Act of 1978, 92 Stat. 1811, 15 U.S.C. ss. 3001 et seq.
(b) Wagers accepted at the horse track in this state may be, but are not required to be, included in the pari-mutuel pools of the out-of-state horse track that broadcasts the race. Notwithstanding any contrary provisions of this chapter, if the horse track in this state elects to include wagers accepted on such races in the pari-mutuel pools of the out-of-state horse track that broadcasts the race, from the amount wagered by patrons at the horse track in this state and included in the pari-mutuel pools of the out-of-state horse track, the horse track in this state shall deduct as the takeout from the amount wagered by patrons at the horse track in this state and included in the pari-mutuel pools of the out-of-state horse track a percentage equal to the percentage deducted from the amount wagered at the out-of-state racetrack as is authorized by the laws of the jurisdiction exercising regulatory authority over the out-of-state horse track.
(c) All forms of pari-mutuel wagering are allowed on races broadcast under this section, and all money wagered by patrons on such races shall be computed as part of the total amount of money wagered at each racing performance for purposes of taxation under ss. 550.0951, 550.09512, and 550.09515. Section 550.2625(2)(a), (b), and (c) does not apply to any money wagered on races broadcast under this section. Similarly, the takeout shall be increased by breaks and uncashed tickets for wagers on races broadcast under this section, notwithstanding any contrary provision of this chapter.
(4) Any greyhound permitholder or jai alai permitholder licensed under this chapter may receive at its licensed location broadcasts of dograces or jai alai games conducted at other tracks or frontons located outside the state. All forms of pari-mutuel wagering are allowed on dograces or jai alai games broadcast under this subsection. All money wagered by patrons on dograces broadcast under this subsection shall be computed in the amount of money wagered each performance for purposes of taxation under ss. 550.0951 and 550.09511.
(5) A pari-mutuel permitholder licensed under this chapter may not receive broadcasts of races or games from outside this state except from an out-of-state pari-mutuel permitholder who holds the same type or class of pari-mutuel permit as the pari-mutuel permitholder licensed under this chapter who intends to receive the broadcast.
(6)(a) A permitholder conducting live races or games may not conduct fewer than eight live races or games on any authorized race day except as provided in this subsection. A thoroughbred permitholder may not conduct fewer than eight live races on any race day without the written approval of the Florida Thoroughbred Breeders’ Association and the Florida Horsemen’s Benevolent and Protective Association, Inc., unless it is determined by the commission that another entity represents a majority of the thoroughbred racehorse owners and trainers in the state. If conducting live racing, a harness permitholder may conduct fewer than eight live races on any authorized race day. Any harness horse permitholder may receive full-card broadcasts of harness horse races conducted at harness racetracks outside this state at the harness track of the permitholder and accept wagers on such harness races.
(b) Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, any harness horse permitholder accepting broadcasts of out-of-state harness horse races when such permitholder is not conducting live races must make the out-of-state signal available to all permitholders eligible to conduct intertrack wagering and shall pay to guest tracks located as specified in ss. 550.615(6) and 550.6305(9)(d) 50 percent of the net proceeds after taxes and fees to the out-of-state host track on harness race wagers which they accept. A harness horse permitholder shall be required to pay into its purse account 50 percent of the net income retained by the permitholder on account of wagering on the out-of-state broadcasts received pursuant to this subsection. Nine-tenths of a percent of all harness wagering proceeds on the broadcasts received pursuant to this subsection shall be paid to the Florida Standardbred Breeders and Owners Association under the provisions of s. 550.2625(4) for the purposes provided therein.
(7) A racetrack or fronton may not pay any patron for any pari-mutuel ticket purchased on any race or game transmitted pursuant to this section until the stewards, judges, or panel of judges or other similarly constituted body at the racetrack or fronton where the race or game originates has confirmed the race or game as official.
(8) The entry and participation for a purse or any other prize of any racing animal by the owner of the animal and the jockey or driver is tantamount to acceptance of such purse or prize as full and complete remuneration and payment for such entry and participation, including the broadcast of such event, except as otherwise provided in this section.
(9) To the extent that any rights, privileges, or immunities granted to pari-mutuel permitholders under this section conflict with any other law or affect any order or rule of the Florida Public Service Commission relating to the regulation of public utilities and the furnishing to others of any communication, wire service, or other similar service or equipment, the rights, privileges, or immunities granted under this section prevail over such conflicting provisions.
(10) The commission may adopt rules necessary to facilitate commingling of pari-mutuel pools, to ensure the proper calculation of payoffs in circumstances in which different commission percentages are applicable and to regulate the distribution of net proceeds between the horse track and, in this state, the horsemen’s associations.
(11) Greyhound permitholders and jai alai permitholders have the same privileges as provided in this section to horserace permitholders, as applicable, subject to rules adopted under subsection (10).
(12) All permitholders licensed under this chapter have standing to enforce the provisions of subsections (2) and (3) in the courts of this state.
(13) This section does not prohibit the commingling of national pari-mutuel pools by a totalisator company that is licensed under this chapter. Such commingling of national pools is subject to commission review and approval and must be performed in accordance with rules adopted by the commission to ensure accurate calculation and distribution of the pools.
(14) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (3)(b) pertaining to takeout, takeouts different from those of the host track may be used when the totalisator is programmed for net pool pricing and the host track elects to use net pool pricing in the calculation of its pools. This provision shall also apply to greyhound intertrack and simulcast wagers.
History.s. 39, ch. 92-348; s. 12, ch. 95-390; s. 12, ch. 96-364; s. 27, ch. 2000-354; s. 22, ch. 2021-271; s. 36, ch. 2022-7; s. 10, ch. 2024-115.

F.S. 550.3551 on Google Scholar

F.S. 550.3551 on CourtListener

Amendments to 550.3551


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 550.3551
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

S550.3551 1 - GAMBLING - TRANS RACE/JAI ALAI INFO FOR ILLEG GAMBL PURP - F: T

Cases Citing Statute 550.3551

Total Results: 6  |  Sort by: Relevance  |  Newest First

Copy

Gulfstream Park Racing v. Tampa Bay Downs, 948 So. 2d 599 (Fla. 2006).

Cited 41 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 2006 Fla. LEXIS 2207, 2006 WL 2690152

...Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 3001-3007 (2000) ("IHA"). Florida's Wagering Act dictates that a simulcast signal from an out-of-state thoroughbred racetrack can only be directly received by an in-state thoroughbred racetrack which is conducting live races. See § 550.3551(5), Fla....
...ertified question to be in the affirmative. Federal Preemption Although not phrased precisely in these terms, Gulfstream essentially asserts that, by including a requirement that simulcast *608 signals from out-of-state venues comply with the IHA in section 550.3551(3)(a), the Florida Legislature recognized that the IHA preempts Florida's otherwise vast police power to regulate gambling within the state. See § 550.3551(3)(a), Fla....
Copy

Gulfstream Park Racing Ass'n, Inc. v. Tampa Bay Downs, Inc., 294 F. Supp. 2d 1291 (M.D. Fla. 2003).

Cited 3 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20225, 2003 WL 22888995

...da law requires an out-of-state thoroughbred racetrack and an in-state thoroughbred racetrack (which is conducting live racing) to enter into a contract to provide simulcasts *1296 and to accept wagers on out-of-state horse races. [7] See Fla. Stat. § 550.3551(5)....
...Out-of-state racetracks now transmit their simulcast signal via satellite and neither Gulfstream nor TBD actually re-broadcast an out-of-state racetrack's signal. Gulfstream's argument fails. First, if this Court accepted Gulfstream's argument, then almost no ITWS wagering could legally occur in Florida. Under Section 550.3551(5), jai alai frontons, greyhound race tracks, and other non-thoroughbred racing venues cannot directly receive broadcasts from an out-of-state thoroughbred racetrack. See Fla. Stat. § 550.3551(3)....
...[20] Florida Administrative Code rule 61D-9.001(1)(b) states in relevant part: "[n]o permitholder shall enter a contractual agreement that is in violation of, or may be construed as waiving, the requirements of these rules or Chapter 550, Florida Statutes." [21] Section 550.3551(5) reads: A pari-mutuel permitholder licensed under this chapter may not receive broadcasts of races or games from outside this state except from an out-of-state pari-mutuel permitholder who holds the same type or class of pari-mutuel permit as the pari-mutuel permitholder licensed under this chapter who intends to receive the broadcast. Fla. Stat. § 550.3551(5)....
Copy

Dep't of State, etc. v. Florida Greyhound Ass'n, Inc., etc., 253 So. 3d 513 (Fla. 2018).

Cited 2 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida

...Similarly, the link between cardroom operations and dog racing is a creature of statute, not the Florida Constitution. § 849.086(5)(a), Fla. Stat. (2018) (providing that “[a] cardroom license may only be issued to a licensed pari-mutuel permitholder”); see also § 550.3551(6)(a), Fla. Stat....
Copy

Calder Race Course, Inc. v. Dep't of Bus. & Prof'l Reg., Div. of Pari-Mutuel Wagering, 664 So. 2d 297 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12494, 1995 WL 699901

...In June of 1995, Calder sent a letter to the Division requesting permission to conduct full-card simulcasting. Simulcasting is the television broadcast of live in-state events to an out-of-state location; or the receiving of live out-of-state events at an in-state location, § 550.002(31), Fla.Stat. (1993). Section 550.3551(6), Florida Statutes (1993), places a 20% limitation on simulcasting in order to protect pari-mutuel wagering at live races, and provides: “In no event shall more than 20 percent of the races or games on which wagers are taken duri...
...e hearing. On July 27, 1995, the Division denied the request for a formal hearing. Calder appeals the initial denial of its request for full-card simulcasting and the Division’s subsequent denial of its request for a formal administrative hearing. Section 550.3551(6) gives the Division authority to take agency action in granting or denying a request to exceed the 20% limitation....
...Accordingly, we reverse and remand instructing the Division to hold a formal administrative hearing in order to ensure the generation of a proper record, as well as responsible agency decisionmaking and poli-cymaking. We are not unmindful of the Division’s good faith interpretation of Section 550.3551(6), and thus deny Calder’s request for attorney’s fees and costs....
Copy

West Flagler Assocs., Ltd. v. Dep't of Bus. & Prof'l Reg., Div. of Pari-Mutuel Wagering, 219 So. 3d 149 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2017 WL 1713304, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 6170

...6 West Flagler contends that, in construing section 550.0745(1), we should define the term “total pool” synonymously with the term “handle.” The term “handle” is statutorily defined, and means “the aggregate contributions to pari-mutuel pools.” § 550.3551(2)(b)....
Copy

Inv. Corp. of Palm Beach v. Dep't of Bus. & Prof'l Reg., Div. of Pari-Mutuel Wagering, 764 So. 2d 845 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 10145, 2000 WL 1114309

...First, the parties identified the pure interstate wagering scenario — an out-of state race simulcast to an in-state track. In this context the takeout of the in-state track is increased by breaks and outs on wagers made at that track on the out-of-state race pursuant to section 550.3551(3)(c), Florida Statutes (1999). Section 550.3551(3) applies to the receipt of simulcast broadcasts from out-of-state race tracks and governs all Florida horse tracks, including Calder, Tropical Park, and Gulfstream....
...same as the takeout on similar pari-mutuel pools conducted at the host track.” [e.s.] § 550.6305(4), Fla. Stat. (1999). To determine what is included in the takeout at the host track, we refer back to the section on host track simulcast wagering, section 550.3551(3)(c), which instructs that the takeout is increased by breaks and outs....
...or Tropical Park) are included as part of the takeout of the guest track in the same way that breaks and outs are included in a host track’s takeout generated by wagers placed at that track on simulcast races broadcast to the host track, following section 550.3551, Florida Statutes (1999)....
...gers placed at Palm Beach because they are not themselves conducting the live race which is being re-broadcast to Palm Beach. They merely act as the in-state broadcaster. 5 Such intertrack wagers are governed not by section 550.6325, but by sections 550.3551(3)(c) and 550.6305, Florida Statutes (1999)....
...the DPMW. . However, breaks and outs generated by wagers placed at the host track on those races then re-broadcast to a guest track are, according to section 550.6305(9), Florida Statutes (1999), included in the host track’s takeout as provided in section 550.3551....

This Florida statute resource is curated by Graham W. Syfert, Esq., a Jacksonville, Florida personal injury and workers' compensation attorney. For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.