Florida/Georgia Personal Injury & Workers Compensation

You're probably overthinking it. Call a lawyer.

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 499.06 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 499.06 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 499.06 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 499.06

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XXXIII
REGULATION OF TRADE, COMMERCE, INVESTMENTS, AND SOLICITATIONS
Chapter 499
FLORIDA DRUG AND COSMETIC ACT
View Entire Chapter
499.06 Embargoing, detaining, or destroying article or processing equipment which is in violation of law or rule.
(1) When a duly authorized agent of the department finds, or has probable cause to believe, that any drug, device, or cosmetic is in violation of any provision of this part or any rule adopted under this part so as to be dangerous, unwholesome, or fraudulent within the meaning of this part, she or he may issue and enforce a stop-sale, stop-use, removal, or hold order, which order gives notice that such article or processing equipment is, or is suspected of being, in violation and has been detained or embargoed, and which order warns all persons not to remove, use, or dispose of such article or processing equipment by sale or otherwise until permission for removal, use, or disposal is given by such agent or the court. It is unlawful for any person to remove, use, or dispose of such detained or embargoed article or processing equipment by sale or otherwise without such permission; and such act is a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
(2) When an article or processing equipment detained or embargoed under subsection (1) has been found by such agent to be in violation of law or rule, she or he shall, within 90 days after the issuance of such notice, petition the circuit court, in the jurisdiction of which the article or processing equipment is detained or embargoed, for an order for condemnation of such article or processing equipment. When such agent has found that an article or processing equipment so detained or embargoed is not in violation, she or he shall rescind the stop-sale, stop-use, removal, or hold order.
(3) If the court finds that the detained or embargoed article or processing equipment is in violation, such article or processing equipment shall, after entry of the court order, be destroyed or made sanitary at the expense of the claimant thereof, under the supervision of such agent; and all court costs, fees, and storage and other proper expenses shall be taxed against the claimant of such article or processing equipment or her or his agent. However, when the violation can be corrected by proper labeling of the article or sanitizing of the processing equipment, and after such costs, fees, and expenses have been paid and a good and sufficient bond, conditioned that such article be so labeled or processed or such processing equipment be so sanitized, has been executed, the court may by order direct that such article or processing equipment be delivered to the claimant thereof for such labeling, processing, or sanitizing, under the supervision of an agent of the department. The expense of such supervision shall be paid by the claimant. Such bond shall be returned to the claimant of the article or processing equipment upon representation to the court by the department that the article or processing equipment is no longer in violation of this part and that the expenses of such supervision have been paid.
(4) When the department or any of its authorized agents finds in any room, building, vehicle of transportation, or other structure any perishable articles that are unsound or contain any filthy, decomposed, or putrid substances, or which may be poisonous or deleterious to health or otherwise unsafe, the same being hereby declared to be a nuisance, the department, or its authorized agent, shall forthwith condemn or destroy such articles or in any other manner render such articles unsalable.
History.s. 34, ch. 82-225; s. 1, ch. 83-265; ss. 41, 52, ch. 92-69; s. 592, ch. 97-103; s. 32, ch. 2008-207.

F.S. 499.06 on Google Scholar

F.S. 499.06 on CourtListener

Amendments to 499.06


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 499.06
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

S499.06 - HEALTH-SAFETY - USE DISPOSE DETAINED DRUG DEVICE COSMET EQUIP - F: S

Cases Citing Statute 499.06

Total Results: 3  |  Sort by: Relevance  |  Newest First

Copy

Bio-med Plus v. State, Dept. of Health, 915 So. 2d 669 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005).

Cited 6 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 16640, 2005 WL 2662549

...n unacceptable risk of injury to the frail and seriously ill consuming public and their prescribing practitioners. II. In our review, we must determine whether the ESO complies with the requirements of section 120.60(6), Florida Statutes (2004), and section 499.066(5), Florida Statutes (2004)....
...g at the time of, or prior to, its action the specific facts and reasons for finding an immediate danger to the public health, safety, or welfare and its reasons for concluding that the procedure used is fair under the circumstances . . . Similarly, section 499.066(5), Florida Statutes (2004), provides: (5) The Department may issue an emergency order immediately suspending or revoking a permit if it determines that any condition in the establishment presents *672 a danger to the public health, safety, and welfare....
...be fair. Bertany Assoc. for Travel and Leisure, Inc. v. Fla. Dep't of Fin. Servs., 877 So.2d 854, 855 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004)(citing Premier Travel Int'l, Inc. v. State, Dep't of Agric. and Consumer Servs., 849 So.2d 1132, 1134-37 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003)). Section 499.067(1)(b)4, Florida Statutes (2004), provides that the Department may suspend a permit if any of the conditions enumerated in section 499.012(5) are present....
...Establishing the basis for an emergency suspension without a hearing, however, places a greater burden on the Department than a proceeding under sections 120.569 and 120.57. As discussed above, to obtain an emergency suspension without hearing, under both section 120.60(6) and section 499.066(5), and applicable case law, among other things, the Department must set forth facts demonstrating an "immediate danger to the public health, safety or welfare" before an ESO may be entered. The Department argues that, because Bio-Med and its affiliates have been charged with various felonies in the federal indictment, the requirements of sections 120.60(6) and 499.066(5) have been satisfied. Section 499.067(1)(b)4 permits the Department to suspend or revoke a permit *673 if the Department finds that the "permittee......
...ation of section 499.012(5)(i) may satisfy the Department's burden in a proceeding under sections 120.569 and 120.57, an issue we do not reach, an allegation of such a violation does not, by itself, satisfy the requirements of sections 120.60(6) and 499.066(5)....
...Further, *674 the Department argues that, because the actions alleged in the indictment are so contrary to the public health and safety and continued over a long period of time, we should deem such actions as continuous and an immediate risk or danger to the public. Given the requirements of sections 120.60(6) and 499.066(5), we cannot agree....
Copy

State v. Rodriguez, 71 So. 3d 154 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 14534, 2011 WL 4056138

...ndants; “did unlawfully and knowingly adulterate a drug intended for distribution and/or did unlawfully and knowingly repackage, sell, deliver, or hold or offer for sale any drug that was misbranded or adulterated, in violation of Florida Statutes 499.0691(3)(b), 499.0691(3)(a), and 777.011.” Count nine pertains to the “Nuria’s operation,” and count seventeen pertains to the “Santa Clara operation.” Section 499.0691(3), Florida Statutes (2003), provides 1 in pertinent part, as follows: (3) Any person who violates any of the following provisions commits a felony of the second degree.......
...& Associates, put key people in each of the locations, set the prices, found the wholesalers. ADULTERATION OR MISBRANDING OF DRUGS Although the defendant was convicted in counts nine and seventeen of *161 adulteration or misbranding of drugs in violation of sections 499.0691(3)(a) and/or (b), the trial court granted the defendant’s motion for judgment of acquittal as to these counts based on a finding that the State failed to prove that any of the items seized/dispensed were, in fact, drugs....
...adulteration of drugs, we briefly address the proof regarding misbranding and/or adulteration. Specific to this defendant’s prosecution, it is illegal to hold, repackage, offer for sale, or deliver any drug that has been adulterated or misbranded. § 499.0691(3)....
...We therefore affirm the defendant’s convictions as to counts six and fourteen. Judgment of conviction for counts six and fourteen affirmed; judgment of acquittal for counts nine and seventeen reversed, with instructions to reinstate verdicts of guilt and to sentence the defendant accordingly. . Section 499.0691(3) was amended and renumbered in 2008 and is now section 499.0051(14)....
Copy

Joel De La Osa v. State, 158 So. 3d 712 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 2279, 2015 WL 669563

enterprise, the Florida Legislature amended section 499.006, Florida Statutes, to define an “adulterated

This Florida statute resource is curated by Graham W. Syfert, Esq., a Jacksonville, Florida personal injury and workers' compensation attorney. For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.