Florida/Georgia Personal Injury & Workers Compensation

You're probably overthinking it. Call a lawyer.

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 329.10 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 329.10 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 329.10 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 329.10

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XXV
AVIATION
Chapter 329
AIRCRAFT: TITLE; REGISTRATION; LIENS
View Entire Chapter
329.10 Aircraft registration.
(1) It is unlawful for any person in this state to knowingly have in his or her possession an aircraft that is not registered in accordance with the regulations of the Federal Aviation Administration contained in Title 14, chapter 1, parts 47-49 of the Code of Federal Regulations.
(2) Any aircraft in or operated in this state that is found to be registered to a nonexistent person, firm, or corporation or to a firm, business, or corporation which is no longer a legal entity is in violation of this section. Any firm, business, or corporation that has no physical location or corporate officers or that has lapsed into an inactive state or been dissolved by order of the Secretary of State for a period of at least 90 days with no documented attempt to reinstate the firm, business, or corporation or to register its aircraft in the name of a real person or legal entity in accordance with Federal Aviation Administration regulations is in violation of this section.
(3) A person who knowingly supplies false information to a governmental entity in regard to the name, address, business name, or business address of the owner of an aircraft in or operated in the state is in violation of this section.
(4) It is a violation of this section for any person or corporate entity to knowingly supply false information to any governmental entity in regard to ownership by it or another firm, business, or corporation of an aircraft in or operated in this state if it is determined that such corporate entity or other firm, business, or corporation:
(a) Is not, or has never been, a legal entity in this state;
(b) Is not, or has never been, a legal entity in any other state; or
(c) Has lapsed into a state of no longer being a legal entity in this state as defined in part I of chapter 607 or s. 865.09, and no documented attempt has been made to correct such information with the governmental entity for a period of 90 days after the date on which such lapse took effect with the Secretary of State.
(5) This section does not apply to any aircraft registration or information supplied by a governmental entity in the course and scope of performing its lawful duties.
(6)(a) A violation of this section shall be deemed a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
(b) Any violation of this section shall constitute the aircraft to which it relates as contraband, and said aircraft may be seized as contraband by a law enforcement agency and shall be subject to forfeiture pursuant to ss. 932.701-932.704.
History.s. 5, ch. 83-272; s. 2, ch. 84-259; s. 21, ch. 87-243; s. 471, ch. 95-148; s. 41, ch. 2014-209.

F.S. 329.10 on Google Scholar

F.S. 329.10 on CourtListener

Amendments to 329.10


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 329.10
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

S329.10 1 - PROPERTY CRIMES - POSSESS UNREGISTERED AIRCRAFT - F: T
S329.10 2 - PROPERTY CRIMES - POSS OPR AIRCRAFT BY NON LEGAL ENTITY PERSON - F: T
S329.10 3 - FRAUD-FALSE STATEMENT - GIVE FALSE INFO REGARDING AIRCRAFT OWNER - F: T
S329.10 4 - FRAUD-FALSE STATEMENT - RE AIRCRAFT OWNER BY NON LEGAL ENTITY PERSON - F: T

Cases Citing Statute 329.10

Total Results: 8  |  Sort by: Relevance  |  Newest First

Copy

In Re Forfeiture of One Cessna 337H Aircraft, 475 So. 2d 1269 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985).

Cited 8 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2036

...Two actions have been consolidated on appeal because in each the trial court declined to permit forfeiture of an aircraft on constitutional grounds. We affirm, but for a different reason. The premise of both complaints is that the possession or use of an aircraft in violation of section 329.10, Florida Statutes (Supp. 1984), [1] entitles a governmental entity to obtain forfeiture of that aircraft pursuant to the Florida Contraband Forfeiture Act. [2] Both trial courts rejected this premise and found that section 329.10 — which provides (in part) that it is a third-degree felony for a dissolved corporation to possess an aircraft — is unconstitutional. The two courts struck section 329.10 on the grounds that (A) the statute runs afoul of the Supremacy Clause because Congress has preempted state regulation of the field through enactment of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958, section 101 et seq., (current version at 49 U.S.C....
...2193, 2199, 68 L.Ed.2d 693 (1981); McKibben v. Mallory, 293 So.2d 48, 51 (Fla. 1974); Granados v. Miller, 369 So.2d 358, 360 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979), appeal dismissed, 394 So.2d 1152 (Fla. 1981). The underlying premise of both cases, viz., that an aircraft used in violation of section 329.10 is subject to forfeiture under the Florida Contraband Forfeiture Act, is erroneous....
...There, the court explained that under the Florida Contraband Forfeiture Act personal property becomes contraband and subject to forfeiture only if it is employed as an "instrumentality" in the commission of any felony. Alluding to an aircraft used in violation of section 329.10, the court said: The aircraft, however, is not the means or instrument by which the offense of possession of an improperly registered aircraft is committed....
...To qualify as an instrumentality, the [aircraft], which is not contraband per se, must have assisted in the commission of another, different felony. Possession of an improperly registered aircraft under the circumstances and conditions set forth in section 329.10 is a felony, but that status or state does not give rise to a different crime. Id. at 1383. We endorse the holding of our sister court that forfeiture is not an authorized sanction for violation of section 329.10. Accordingly, we affirm the trial courts' basic decision to deny forfeiture of the aircraft in the cases at bar. ANSTEAD, LETTS and HURLEY, JJ., concur. NOTES [1] Section 329.10, Florida Statutes (Supp....
Copy

City, Indian Harbour Beach v. Damron, 465 So. 2d 1382 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 821

...tion Administration. Although the prior owner had registered the plane, he had not forwarded the papers to complete the transfer of registration to Damron. The City seized the plane, claiming Damron's possession of the unregistered aircraft violated section 329.10, Florida Statutes (1983), which makes the possession of an improperly registered aircraft a third degree felony....
...elf. To qualify as an instrumentality, the Cessna, which is not contraband per se, must have assisted in the commission of another, different felony. Possession of an improperly registered aircraft under the circumstances and conditions set forth in section 329.10 is a felony, but that status or state does not give rise to a different crime....
...We held that the truck in that case was being used as an instrumentality in the accomplishment of a different crime — possession of a short-barreled shotgun — and, therefore, it was subject to forfeiture pursuant to section 932.701(2)(e). AFFIRMED. ORFINGER and COWART, JJ., concur. NOTES [1] The parties conceded that section 329.10 had been violated, so we do not address that issue.
Copy

City of St. Petersburg Beach v. Jewell, 489 So. 2d 78 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 11 Fla. L. Weekly 980, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7464

...elf. To qualify as an instrumentality, the Cessna, which is not contraband per se, must have assisted in the commission of another, different felony. Possession of an improperly registered aircraft under the circumstances and conditions set forth in section 329.10 is a felony, but that status or state does not give rise to a different crime....
Copy

Elliott v. Aircraft Eng'g, Inc., 532 So. 2d 1123 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2374, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4660, 1988 WL 109687

...olved corporation and entered a final judgment forfeiting the aircraft to the Polk County Sheriff’s Department. According to the record, the aircraft was seized by the Polk County Sheriff’s Department on October 14,1986, as being in violation of section 329.10, Florida Statutes (1985), which requires that an aircraft maintain current registration with the Federal Aviation Administration....
Copy

In re Forfeiture of One 1980 Cessna T 207-A, Serial No. 20700623, 587 So. 2d 553 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 9739, 1991 WL 193331

Sections 932.701-932.704, Fla.Stat. (1989). Section 329.10(6)(b) provides the following:1 Any violation
Copy

In re the Forfeiture of 1979 Mercedes, 4-Door, VIN 11603312085778, Tag WHJ 371, & $1,262.00 In United States Currency, 484 So. 2d 642 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 11 Fla. L. Weekly 638, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6756

...*645 To qualify as an instrumentality, the Cessna, which is not contraband per se, must have assisted in the commission of another, different felony. Possession of an improperly registered aircraft under the circumstances and conditions set forth in section 329.10 is a felony, but that status or state does not give rise to a different crime....
Copy

First Coast Restaurants, Inc. v. Vogel, 592 So. 2d 1258 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 904, 1992 WL 18544

GOSHORN, Chief Judge. The issue in this appeal is whether an airplane, owned by a Florida corporation which had previously been dissolved for failure to file its annual report, can be seized and forfeited pursuant to section 329.10, Florida Statutes (1989) after the corporation has been reinstated to active corporate status....
...As a result, the Secretary of State returned First Coast to active corporate status. Six months later, on November 25, 1989, the Volusia County Sheriff seized First Coast’s airplane. On January 30, 1990, Volusia County filed a petition seeking forfeiture of the airplane and alleged that First Coast violated section 329.10, Florida Statutes (1989) by operating the airplane within Volusia County on at least nine separate occasions during the period in which First Coast had been dissolved. Section 329.10, Florida Statutes (1989), provides in pertinent part that: (2) Any aircraft in or operated in this state that is found to be registered to a nonexistent person, firm, or corporation or to a firm, business, or corporation which is no longer a legal entity is in violation of this section....
...(b) Any violation of this section shall constitute the aircraft to which it relates as contraband, and said aircraft may be seized as contraband by a law enforcement agency and shall be subject to forfeiture pursuant to ss. 932.701-932.704. First Coast contends that section 329.10 only permits seizure if the corporation is dissolved at the time the plane is seized. We agree. Forfeiture statutes are penal in nature and are strictly construed. Coleman v. Brandon, 426 So.2d 44 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982). The plain language of section 329.10 permits a law enforcement agency to seize an airplane found registered to a dissolved corporation....
...HARRIS and PETERSON, JJ., concur. . Because the result of our analysis of the applicable statutory provisions disposes of this case, we do not address First Coast's remaining arguments. Specifically, we do not address First Coast’s contention that section 329.10, as applied, violated its constitutional due process rights....
Copy

City of Pompano Beach v. Enroute Ltd., 475 So. 2d 1269 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

...Two actions have been consolidated on appeal because in each the trial court declined to permit forfeiture of an aircraft on constitutional grounds. We affirm, but for a different reason. The premise of both complaints is that the possession or use of an aircraft in violation of section 329.10, Florida Statutes (Supp.1984), 1 entitles a governmental entity to obtain forfeiture of that aircraft pursuant to the Florida Contraband Forfeiture Act. 2 Both trial courts rejected this premise and found that section 329.10 — which provides (in part) that it is a third-degree felony for a dissolved corporation to possess an aircraft — is unconstitutional. The two courts struck section 329.10 on the grounds that (A) the statute runs afoul of the Supremacy Clause because Congress has preempted state regulation of the field through enactment of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958, section 101 et seq., (current version at 49 U.S.C....
...2193, 2199 , 68 L.Ed.2d 693 (1981); McKibben v. Mallory, 293 So.2d 48, 51 (Fla.1974); Granados v. Miller, 369 So.2d 358, 360 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979), appeal dismissed, 394 So.2d 1152 (Fla. 1981). The underlying premise of both cases, viz., that an aircraft used in violation of section 329.10 is subject to forfeiture under the Florida Contraband Forfeiture Act, is erroneous....
...There, the court explained that under the Florida Contraband Forfeiture Act personal property becomes contraband and subject to forfeiture only if it is employed as an “instrumentality” in the commission of any felony. Alluding to an aircraft used in violation of section 329.10, the court said: The aircraft, however, is not the means or instrument by which the offense of possession of an improperly registered aircraft is committed....
...To qualify as an instrumentality, the [aircraft], which is not contraband per se, must have assisted in the commission of another, different felony. Possession of an improperly registered aircraft under the circumstances and conditions set forth in section 329.10 is a felony, but that status or state does not give rise to a different crime. Id. at 1383 . We endorse the holding of our sister court that forfeiture is not an authorized sanction for violation of section 329.10. Accordingly, we affirm the trial courts’ basic decision to deny forfeiture of the aircraft in the cases at bar. ANSTEAD, LETTS and HURLEY, JJ., concur. . Section 329.10, Florida Statutes (Supp.1984), provides, in part, as follows: (1) It is unlawful for any person in this state to knowingly have in his possession an aircraft that is not registered in accordance with the regulations of the Federal Avia...

This Florida statute resource is curated by Graham W. Syfert, Esq., a Jacksonville, Florida personal injury and workers' compensation attorney. For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.