Florida/Georgia Personal Injury & Workers Compensation

You're probably overthinking it. Call a lawyer.

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 110.227 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 110.227 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 110.227 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 110.227

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title X
PUBLIC OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES, AND RECORDS
Chapter 110
STATE EMPLOYMENT
View Entire Chapter
110.227 Suspensions, dismissals, reductions in pay, demotions, layoffs, transfers, and grievances.
(1) Any employee who has satisfactorily completed at least a 1-year probationary period in his or her current position may be suspended or dismissed only for cause. Cause shall include, but is not limited to, poor performance, negligence, inefficiency or inability to perform assigned duties, insubordination, violation of the provisions of law or agency rules, conduct unbecoming a public employee, misconduct, habitual drug abuse, or conviction of any crime. The agency head shall ensure that all employees of the agency have reasonable access to the agency’s personnel manual.
(2)(a) The department shall establish rules and procedures for the suspension, reduction in pay, transfer, layoff, demotion, and dismissal of employees in the career service. Except with regard to law enforcement or correctional officers, firefighters, or professional health care providers, rules regarding layoff procedures shall not include any system whereby a career service employee with greater seniority has the option of selecting a different position not being eliminated, but either vacant or already occupied by an employee of less seniority, and taking that position, commonly referred to as “bumping.”
(b) For the implementation of layoffs as defined in s. 110.107, the department shall develop rules requiring retention of the agency’s employees based upon objective measures that give consideration to comparative merit, demonstrated skills, the employee’s experience, and the employee’s length of service. Such rules shall be approved by the Administration Commission before their adoption by the department.
(3)(a) With regard to law enforcement or correctional officers, firefighters, or professional health care providers, when a layoff becomes necessary, such layoff shall be conducted within the competitive area identified by the agency head and approved by the Department of Management Services. Such competitive area shall be established taking into consideration the similarity of work; the organizational unit, which may be by agency, department, division, bureau, or other organizational unit; and the commuting area for the work affected.
(b) With regard to law enforcement or correctional officers, firefighters, or professional health care providers, layoff procedures shall be developed to establish the relative merit and fitness of employees and shall include a formula for uniform application among all employees in the competitive area, taking into consideration the type of appointment, the length of service, and the evaluations of the employee’s performance within the last 5 years of employment.
(4) A grievance process shall be available to career service employees who have satisfactorily completed at least a 1-year probationary period in their current positions. A grievance is defined as the dissatisfaction that occurs when an employee believes that any condition affecting the employee is unjust, inequitable, or a hindrance to effective operation. Claims of discrimination and sexual harassment or claims related to suspensions, reductions in pay, demotions, and dismissals are not subject to the career service grievance process. The following procedures shall apply to any grievance filed pursuant to this subsection, except that all timeframes may be extended in writing by mutual agreement:
(a) Step One.The employee may submit a signed, written grievance on a form provided by the agency to his or her supervisor within 14 calendar days following the occurrence of the event giving rise to the grievance. The supervisor must meet with the employee to discuss the grievance and provide a written response to the employee within 7 business days following receipt of the grievance.
(b) Step Two.If the employee is dissatisfied with the response of his or her supervisor, the employee may submit the written grievance to the agency head or his or her designee within 7 business days following receipt of the supervisor’s written response. The agency head or his or her designee must meet with the employee to discuss the grievance within 5 business days following receipt of the grievance. The agency head or his or her designee must respond in writing to the employee within 5 business days following the meeting. The written decision of the agency head shall be the final authority for all grievances filed pursuant to this subsection. Such grievances may not be appealed beyond Step Two.
(5)(a) A career service employee who has satisfactorily completed at least a 1-year probationary period in his or her current position and who is subject to a suspension, reduction in pay, demotion, involuntary transfer of more than 50 miles by highway, or dismissal shall receive written notice of such action at least 10 days prior to the date such action is to be taken. Subsequent to such notice, and prior to the date the action is to be taken, the affected employee shall be given an opportunity to appear before the agency or official taking the action to answer orally and in writing the charges against him or her. The notice to the employee required by this paragraph may be delivered to the employee personally or may be sent by certified mail with return receipt requested. Such actions shall be appealable to the Public Employees Relations Commission as provided in subsection (6). Written notice of any such appeal shall be filed by the employee with the commission within 21 calendar days after the date on which the notice of suspension, reduction in pay, demotion, involuntary transfer of more than 50 miles by highway, or dismissal is received by the employee.
(b) In extraordinary situations such as when the retention of a career service employee who has satisfactorily completed at least a 1-year probationary period in his or her current position would result in damage to state property, would be detrimental to the best interest of the state, or would result in injury to the employee, a fellow employee, or some other person, such employee may be suspended or dismissed without 10 days’ prior notice, provided that written or oral notice of such action, evidence of the reasons therefor, and an opportunity to rebut the charges are furnished to the employee prior to such dismissal or suspension. Such notice may be delivered to the employee personally or may be sent by certified mail with return receipt requested. Agency compliance with the foregoing procedure requiring notice, evidence, and an opportunity for rebuttal must be substantiated. Any employee who is suspended or dismissed pursuant to the provisions of this paragraph may appeal to the Public Employees Relations Commission as provided in subsection (6). Written notice of any such appeal shall be filed with the commission by the employee within 21 days after the date on which the notice of suspension, reduction in pay, demotion, or dismissal is received by the employee.
(6) The following procedures shall apply to appeals filed pursuant to subsection (5) with the Public Employees Relations Commission, hereinafter referred to as the commission:
(a) The commission must conduct a hearing within 60 calendar days following the filing of a notice of appeal. No extension of time for the hearing may exceed 30 calendar days, absent exceptional circumstances, and no extension of time may be granted without the consent of all parties. Discovery may be granted only upon the showing of extraordinary circumstances. A party requesting discovery shall demonstrate a substantial need for the information requested and an inability to obtain relevant information by other means. Except where inconsistent with the requirements of this subsection, the provisions of s. 447.503(4) and (5) and chapter 120 apply to proceedings held pursuant to this subsection.
(b) A person may represent himself or herself in proceedings before the commission or may be represented by legal counsel or by any individual who qualifies as a representative pursuant to rules adopted by the commission.
(c) If the commission finds that cause did not exist for the agency action, the commission shall reverse the decision of the agency head and the employee shall be reinstated with or without back pay. If the commission finds that cause existed for the agency action, the commission shall affirm the decision of the agency head. The commission may not reduce the penalty imposed by the agency head, except in the case of law enforcement or correctional officers, firefighters, and professional health care providers, if the commission makes specific written findings of mitigation.
(d) A recommended order shall be issued by the hearing officer within 30 days following the hearing. Exceptions to the recommended order shall be filed within 15 days after the recommended order is issued. The final order shall be filed by the commission no later than 45 calendar days after the hearing or after the filing of exceptions or oral arguments if granted.
(e) Final orders issued by the commission pursuant to paragraph (d) shall be reviewable as provided in s. 447.504.
(7) Other than for law enforcement or correctional officers, firefighters, and professional health care providers, each suspension, dismissal, demotion, or reduction in pay must be reviewed without consideration of any other case or set of facts.
History.s. 21, ch. 79-190; s. 3, ch. 81-169; s. 74, ch. 86-163; s. 7, ch. 90-196; s. 1, ch. 91-164; ss. 17, 21, ch. 91-431; s. 33, ch. 92-279; s. 55, ch. 92-326; s. 667, ch. 95-147; s. 17, ch. 96-399; s. 4, ch. 98-196; ss. 21, 22, ch. 2001-43; s. 11, ch. 2003-138; s. 1, ch. 2008-126; s. 13, ch. 2012-215.

F.S. 110.227 on Google Scholar

F.S. 110.227 on CourtListener

Amendments to 110.227


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 110.227

Total Results: 36  |  Sort by: Relevance  |  Newest First

Copy

Dep't of Admin. v. Nelson, 424 So. 2d 852 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982).

Cited 18 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

...not lawfully disturb; DOA rules may not lawfully displace Career Service standards for discharge on grounds of "insubordination, willful violation of the provisions of law or agency rules, conduct unbecoming a public employee, [and] misconduct ...," section 110.227(1); and DOA rules may not lawfully supplant Commission authority to reduce an agency dismissal to a suspension if the Commission thinks the infraction "did not justify the severity of the action taken" by the employing agency....
...Should the critical review process, examining the employee's candidacy in light of his other state duties, take place before or after the employee has become a candidate? The Career Service Commission, by design and necessity, operates retrospectively in assessing objectionable employee conduct, for pursuant to section 110.227(5)(a), Florida Statutes (1979), it reviews agency disciplinary action by such standards as *858 negligence, inefficiency or inability to perform assigned duties, insubordination, willful violation of the provisions of law or agency rules, conduct unbecoming a public employee, misconduct, habitual drug abuse, or conviction of any crime involving moral turpitude. Section 110.227(1), Fla....
Copy

Gilbert v. Dep't of Corr., 696 So. 2d 416 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997).

Cited 13 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1997 WL 352904

...t. (1995). She met this burden by showing that domestic violence caused her absences. That the Department of Corrections had a legal right to discharge Ms. Gilbert is not in dispute: She had not yet attained "permanent status in the career service." § 110.227(1), Fla....
Copy

State Dept. of Gen. Serv. v. English, 534 So. 2d 726 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988).

Cited 12 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

...leaving after approximately one-half hour. It was also alleged that on July 25, English came to work late without excuse, and on July 26 he returned from lunch with the smell of alcohol on his breath. Following a disciplinary proceeding pursuant to section 110.227, Florida Statutes (1985), English was dismissed for "problem drinking or alcoholism after treatment proved unsuccessful." A grievance proceeding ensued, but the dismissal was affirmed....
...DGS also contends that for purposes of unemployment compensation, the qualifying phrase "but not limited to" in the § 443.036(24) definition of misconduct effectively adopts the definition of misconduct used in the career service system, even in the absence of specific reference to § 110.227. We disagree. Section 110.227 provides that a career service employee may be dismissed or suspended for cause....
Copy

Scherer v. Davis, 543 F. Supp. 4 (N.D. Fla. 1982).

Cited 9 times | Published | District Court, N.D. Florida

...Moreover, there must be a controversy at the time the court acts. Id. ; see also Socialist Labor Party v. Gilligan, 406 U.S. 583, 92 S.Ct. 1716, 32 L.Ed.2d 317 (1972). The legislature repealed section 110.061 of the Florida Statutes in 1979. During that same session, the legislature *21 enacted section 110.227(5)(a) of the Florida Statutes which provides for constitutionally sufficient pre-termination procedures....
Copy

Florida Dept. of Corr. v. Provin, 515 So. 2d 302 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2498, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10801

...viously submitted, and raising for the first time an issue not earlier brought to the attention of the Commission, alleging that Provin did not receive notice of DOC's proposed disciplinary action within ten days before his dismissal, as required by Section 110.227(5), Florida Statutes, and Florida Administrative Code Rule 22A-10.0042....
Copy

Tomlinson v. DHRS, 558 So. 2d 62 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1990 WL 7533

...iency or inability to perform assigned duties, insubordination, willful violation of the provisions of law or agency rules, conduct unbecoming a public employee, misconduct, habitual drug abuse, or conviction of any crime involving moral turpitude." § 110.227(1), Fla....
Copy

Whiting v. Florida Dept. of Law Enf't, 849 So. 2d 1149 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 10867, 2003 WL 21672745

...However, FDLE filed a motion to dismiss the appeal as untimely. The basis for this motion was that Whiting was served with the notice by *1151 certified mail, return receipt requested on March 20, 2002, [1] and was personally served with another notice the next day, March 21, 2002. Pursuant to § 110.227(5), Whiting had 14 calendar days from the date he received the notice to file his appeal....
Copy

Doyle v. Dep't of Bus., 713 So. 2d 1040 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1998 WL 316555

...Douglas, 644 So.2d 1368, 1372 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994). "A statute which allows a demotion or dismissal only on the basis of `cause' creates a constitutionally protected interest in public employment." Johnson v. Beary, 665 So.2d 334, 335 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995). Under section 110.227(1), Florida Statutes (1995), an employee who has permanent status in the career service may only be suspended or dismissed for cause....
Copy

King v. State of Florida, 650 F. Supp. 2d 1157 (N.D. Fla. 2009).

Cited 2 times | Published | District Court, N.D. Florida | 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57983, 2009 WL 1928194

...In determining whether a statutory cause of action is created by a statute that does not express a provision imposing civil liability, legislative intent guides the courts' determination. See Horowitz v. Plantation General Hospital Ltd. Partnership, 959 So.2d 176, 181 (Fla.2007). Plaintiff claims that Florida Statutes § 110.227 imposes a duty upon DEP to ensure that employees are only terminated for cause....
...stion of whether a breach of that duty would give rise to civil liability.") (citations omitted). Instead, employees who believe that the procedures in this statute have not been followed properly are directed to file an appeal with PERC. Fla. Stat. § 110.227(5)(a)....
Copy

Smith v. Florida Dept. of Corr., 961 So. 2d 1050 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 11367, 2007 WL 2089266

...The commission may not reduce the penalty imposed by the agency head, except in the case of law enforcement or correctional officers, firefighters, and professional health care providers, if the commission makes specific written findings of mitigation. Id. (codified at § 110.227(6)(c), Fla....
Copy

Florida Pub. Employees Council v. State, 921 So. 2d 676 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2006 WL 162722

...been repealed by the "Service First" legislation, Chapter 2001-43, Laws of Florida. That legislation required the repeal of the career service rules, and, in particular, mandated the deletion of any layoff rule containing a "bumping" provision. See § 110.227(2), Florida Statutes (2001)....
...ble, performed or enforced. Chapter 60K-17, Florida Administrative Code, which formerly governed workforce reduction, contained a "bumping" provision in Rule 60K-17.004(3)(g). However, when the 2001 Legislature enacted the Service First legislation, section 110.227(2) was amended to read: The department shall establish rules and procedures for the suspension, reduction in pay, transfer, layoff, demotion and dismissal of employees in the career service....
...After that litigation culminated in this court's opinion in Florida Public Employees Council 79, AFSCME v. Bush, 860 So.2d 992 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003), the grievance was rescheduled for arbitration. Thereafter, the state refused to arbitrate taking the position "that DOT laid off the toll collector employees in accordance with Section 110.227(2), Florida Statutes, which became effective on May 14, 2001 and superceded Rule 60K-17, F.A.C....
...PERC's general counsel reviewed the charge pursuant to section 447.503(2) and rule 60CC-5.002. The general counsel accepted the reasoning of the state that Article 8, by requiring adherence to former Chapter 60K-17 and allowing "bumping" rights, was in contravention of section 110.227(2)....
...In the order under review, PERC adopted the rationale of the general counsel for dismissing the case, stating as follows: The Service First legislation enacted in 2001 repealed the State's personnel rules, including its layoff rule. As part of that legislation, section 110.227(2), Florida Statutes (2001), prohibited replacing the layoff rule with one that included bumping rights for career service employees other than law enforcement or correctional officers, firefighters, or professional health care providers....
...ause we would have been justified in deciding the issue differently were it before us in the first instance. *681 Therefore, the state urges this court to affirm PERC's decision that the layoff action in this case was administered in accordance with section 110.227(2), which became effective on May 14, 2001 and superseded Chapter 60K-17, because it is not clearly erroneous....
...Article 8 of the parties' CBA expressly requires layoffs to be implemented pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 60K-17. Chapter 60K-17, containing the disputed layoff rule, was repealed by section 42, Chapter 2001-43, Laws of Florida, effective January 1, 2002. The state argues that the effect of the amendment to section 110.227(2) was to immediately repeal the bumping rule, effective May 14, 2001. We disagree with that reading of section 110.227(2). Instead, as PERC recognized in its own order, section 110.227(2) "prohibited replacing the layoff rule with one that included bumping rights for Career Service employees ..." Section 110.227(2) contemplated that the state's bumping rule would be replaced by a new rule that considered comparative merit, demonstrated skills, and the employee's experience....
Copy

Jenkins v. State, Dept. of Health & Rehab. Servs., 618 So. 2d 749 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1993 WL 128848

...Department of Transportation, 564 So.2d 216 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). The issue of abandonment was discussed in some depth in Tomlinson. As the second district court observed, the underlying statutes do not discuss abandonment or a presumption of separation. 558 So.2d at 66. For example, section 110.227(1) and (2), Florida Statutes (1989), provide: (1) Any employee who has permanent status in the career service may only be suspended or dismissed for cause....
...We question the treatment of an involuntary separation from career service employment as a formal resignation, rather than as a dismissal. Such construction effectively circumvents the statutory provision that an employee having "permanent status in the career service may only be suspended or dismissed for cause." Section 110.227(1), Fla....
Copy

Dep't of Revenue v. Novoa, 745 So. 2d 378 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1999 WL 821070

...1st DCA 1997) (holding that disciplinary standards defining sexual harassment in the workplace are internal management memoranda and not rules). We are also persuaded by a point made in the amicus briefs by the Attorney General and the Department of Management Services. Section 110.227(1), Florida Statutes states that "[e]ach agency head shall ensure that all employees of the agency are completely familiar with the agency's established procedures on disciplinary actions and grievances"; yet there is no accompanying...
Copy

McQuade v. Florida Dep't of Corr., 51 So. 3d 489 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 31 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1009, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 18677, 2010 WL 4829816

...In pertinent part, it provides that "[t]he [C]ommission or its designated agent shall hear appeals arising out of any suspension, reduction in pay, demotion, or dismissal of any permanent employee in the State Career Service System in the manner provided in s. 110-227." § 447.207(8), Fla. Stat. (2009). Section 110.227(6)(c) defines the scope of the Commission's review in a career service appeal. Based on this provision, the Commission is to determine whether cause existed for the employee's discipline or dismissal. See § 110.227(6)(c), Fla....
...t a showing that the employee was prejudiced in defending himself in a subsequent de novo career service appeal before the Commission." Id. The Commission's interpretation of its role is consistent with the statutory mandates of sections 447.207 and 110.227. Section 447.207 gives the Commission the authority to hear career service appeals "in the manner provided in s. 110.227." Section 110.227(6)(c) indicates that the Commission is to reverse it if finds a lack of cause for the agency's action and that it may, in some circumstances, reduce the penalty imposed by the agency head. Section 110.227 does not indicate that a career service appeal is a plenary review of agency action....
Copy

Fewquay v. Page, 682 F. Supp. 1195 (S.D. Fla. 1987).

Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16739, 1987 WL 45179

State of Florida Career Service System. Florida Statute 110.227(1) provides that a permanent status employee
Copy

Williams v. Dep't of Transp., 531 So. 2d 994 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2157, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4133, 1988 WL 94265

which was promulgated under the authority of section 110.227(2), Florida Statutes (1979). When the legislature
Copy

Dep't of Corr. v. Barry, 438 So. 2d 874 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 21634

did not meet the due process requirements of section 110.227(5)(a), Florida Statutes5 and Fla.Admin.Code
Copy

Florida Pub. Employees Council 79 v. Bush, 860 So. 2d 992 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 15704, 2003 WL 22399559

employing agency’s layoff transition plan and section 110.227, Florida Statutes, as the procedure for effecting
Copy

State, Dep't of Gen. Servs. v. English, 534 So. 2d 726 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2336, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4580

Following a disciplinary proceeding pursuant to section 110.227, Florida Statutes (1985), English was dismissed
Copy

Florida State Univ. v. Tucker, 440 So. 2d 37 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 14 Educ. L. Rep. 606, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 23572

did not meet the due process requirements of Section 110.227(5)(a), Florida Statutes (1981); Rule 22A-10
Copy

Delong v. Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservation Comm'n, 145 So. 3d 123 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 38 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 700, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 8115, 2014 WL 2199805

career service employees. . Pursuant to Section 110.227, Florida Statutes (2012), PERC has jurisdiction
Copy

Randall B. Johnson v. Dep't of Corr., 191 So. 3d 965 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 7215, 2016 WL 2755849

extraordinary dismissal procedure set out in section 110.227(5)(b), Florida Statutes. 1 In accordance
Copy

Nute v. Florida Dep't of Law Enf't, 397 So. 2d 1222 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19743

Service unless specifically exempted. Pursuant to § 110.227, Florida Statutes, suspensions, dismissals, reductions
Copy

Fuller v. Dep't of Educ., 927 So. 2d 28 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 179 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2426, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 4323, 2006 WL 756081

be suspended or discharged only for cause, section 110.227, Florida Statutes (2001), and a statute that
Copy

Gilbert v. Dep't of Corr., 696 So. 2d 416 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 7244

attained “permanent status in the career service.” § 110.227(1), Fla. Stat. (1995). See generally State, Dep’t
Copy

Dep't of High. Saf. & Motor Vehs. v. German, 451 So. 2d 1013 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13908

includes inability to perform assigned duties. § 110.227(1), Fla. Stat. (1981). It was the function of
Copy

State, Dep't of Health & Rehabilitative Servs. v. Muniz, 580 So. 2d 886 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 5379, 1991 WL 98006

within the career service system. See, e.g., § 110.227, Fla.Stat. (1989); Fla.Admin.Code Rule 22A-7.010(7)
Copy

Klein v. Dep't of Educ., 908 So. 2d 1097 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 11035, 2005 WL 1681794

appeal, PERC explained it was authorized by section 110.227(5)(a), Florida Statutes, to consider the appeals
Copy

Moyer v. Florida Dep't of Transp., 130 So. 3d 283 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 37 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1084, 2014 WL 304915, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 1359

opportunity for rebuttal must be substantiated. § 110.227(5)(b), Fla. Stat. (2012) (emphasis added). Moyer’s
Copy

Hadley v. Dep't of Admin., Career Serv. Comm'n, 392 So. 2d 1023 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 18751

that to constitute valid notice required by section 110.-227(4), Florida Statutes,1 sufficient postage
Copy

Witt v. Dep't of Corr., 538 So. 2d 1280 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 14 Fla. L. Weekly 310, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 496, 1989 WL 6459

or willful violation of agency rules. See section 110.227(1), Florida Statutes. By such rules DOC requires
Copy

State, Dep't of Health & Rehabilitative Servs. v. Stackhouse, 629 So. 2d 268 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 12350, 1993 WL 527427

the competitive area was drawn too narrowly. Section 110.227(3)(a), Florida Statutes (1991) describes the
Copy

Lavery v. Dept. of High. Saf. & Motor Vehs., 523 So. 2d 696 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 13 Fla. L. Weekly 864, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1313, 1988 WL 28299

...(1985); see Kuhn v. State, 439 So.2d 291, 293 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Wale v. State, 397 So.2d 738, 740 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981); (b) this finding was a sufficient basis for FDHSP to terminate Lavery's employment as a trooper, § 447.208(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (Supp. 1986); § 110.227(1), Fla....
Copy

Dep't of Env't Prot. v. Barker, 654 So. 2d 594 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 4422, 1995 WL 238749

the agency prior to its taking such action.” Section 110.227(4), Florida Statutes (1993). “[A]n agency may
Copy

Baxter v. Florida Career Serv. Comm'n, 380 So. 2d 1044 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

Court of Appeal.” . Now, Florida Statutes, § 110.227 (1979).
Copy

Pesta v. Dep't of Corr., 63 So. 3d 788 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 5344, 2011 WL 1414039

CS-2009-181 (Fla. PERC Sept. 25, 2009), and section 110.227, Florida Statues (2009), PERC dismissed the

This Florida statute resource is curated by Graham W. Syfert, Esq., a Jacksonville, Florida personal injury and workers' compensation attorney. For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.