Florida/Georgia Personal Injury & Workers Compensation

You're probably overthinking it. Call a lawyer.

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 106.25 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 106.25 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 106.25 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 106.25

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title IX
ELECTORS AND ELECTIONS
Chapter 106
CAMPAIGN FINANCING
View Entire Chapter
106.25 Reports of alleged violations to Florida Elections Commission; disposition of findings.
(1) Jurisdiction to investigate and determine violations of this chapter and chapter 104 is vested in the Florida Elections Commission; however, nothing in this section limits the jurisdiction of any other officers or agencies of government empowered by law to investigate, act upon, or dispose of alleged violations of this code.
(2) The commission shall investigate all violations of this chapter and chapter 104, but only after having received either a sworn complaint or information reported to it under this subsection by the Division of Elections. Such sworn complaint must be based upon personal information or information other than hearsay. Any person, other than the division, having information of any violation of this chapter or chapter 104 shall file a sworn complaint with the commission. The commission shall investigate only those alleged violations specifically contained within the sworn complaint. If any complainant fails to allege all violations that arise from the facts or allegations alleged in a complaint, the commission shall be barred from investigating a subsequent complaint from such complainant that is based upon such facts or allegations that were raised or could have been raised in the first complaint. If the complaint includes allegations of violations relating to expense items reimbursed by a candidate, committee, or organization to the campaign account before a sworn complaint is filed, the commission shall be barred from investigating such allegations. Such sworn complaint shall state whether a complaint of the same violation has been made to any state attorney. Within 5 days after receipt of a sworn complaint, the commission shall transmit a copy of the complaint to the alleged violator. The respondent shall have 14 days after receipt of the complaint to file an initial response, and the executive director may not determine the legal sufficiency of the complaint during that time period. If the executive director finds that the complaint is legally sufficient, the respondent shall be notified of such finding by letter, which sets forth the statutory provisions alleged to have been violated and the alleged factual basis that supports the finding. All sworn complaints alleging violations of the Florida Election Code over which the commission has jurisdiction shall be filed with the commission within 2 years after the alleged violations. The period of limitations is tolled on the day a sworn complaint is filed with the commission. The complainant may withdraw the sworn complaint at any time prior to a probable cause hearing if good cause is shown. Withdrawal shall be requested in writing, signed by the complainant, and witnessed by a notary public, stating the facts and circumstances constituting good cause. The executive director shall prepare a written recommendation regarding disposition of the request which shall be given to the commission together with the request. “Good cause” shall be determined based upon the legal sufficiency or insufficiency of the complaint to allege a violation and the reasons given by the complainant for wishing to withdraw the complaint. If withdrawal is permitted, the commission must close the investigation and the case. No further action may be taken. The complaint will become a public record at the time of withdrawal.
(3) For the purposes of commission jurisdiction, a violation shall mean the willful performance of an act prohibited by this chapter or chapter 104 or the willful failure to perform an act required by this chapter or chapter 104. The commission may not by rule determine what constitutes willfulness or further define the term “willful” for purposes of this chapter or chapter 104. Willfulness is a determination of fact; however, at the request of the respondent at any time after probable cause is found, willfulness may be considered and determined in an informal hearing before the commission.
(4) The commission shall undertake a preliminary investigation to determine if the facts alleged in a sworn complaint or a matter initiated by the division constitute probable cause to believe that a violation has occurred.
(a) When the investigator’s report is completed, the executive director shall notify the respondent that the report is completed and shall send to the respondent a copy of the investigator’s report. The investigatory file and main complaint file shall be open for inspection by the respondent and the respondent’s counsel at that time, and copies may be obtained at no more than cost.
(b) The respondent shall be given not less than 14 days from the date of mailing of the investigator’s report to file with the commission a written response to the investigator’s report. This time period may be shortened with the consent of the respondent, or without the consent of the respondent when the passage of time could reasonably be expected to render moot the ultimate disposition of the matter by the commission so long as reasonable notice under the circumstances is given.
(c) Counsel for the commission shall review the investigator’s report and shall make a written recommendation to the commission for the disposition of the complaint. If the counsel for the commission recommends that the commission find probable cause, the recommendation shall include a statement of what charges shall be at issue. A copy of the recommendation shall be furnished to the respondent. The respondent shall be given not less than 14 days from the date of mailing of the recommendation of counsel for the commission to file with the commission a written response to the recommendation. This time period may be shortened with the consent of the respondent, or without the consent of the respondent when the passage of time could reasonably be expected to render moot the ultimate disposition of the matter by the commission, so long as the recommendation is furnished to the respondent within a reasonable period of time under the circumstances.
(d) The respondent and each complainant, their counsel, and the counsel for the commission shall be permitted to attend the hearing at which the probable cause determination is made. Notice of the hearing shall be sent to the respondent, each complainant, and counsel for the commission at least 14 days before the hearing. This time period may be shortened with the consent of the respondent, or without the consent of the respondent when the passage of time could reasonably be expected to render moot the ultimate disposition of the matter by the commission, so long as the notice is furnished within a reasonable period of time under the circumstances.
(e) The probable cause determination is the conclusion of the preliminary investigation. The respondent and the counsel for the commission shall be permitted to make brief oral statements in the nature of oral argument to the commission, based on the investigator’s report, before the probable cause determination. The commission’s determination shall be based upon the investigator’s report, the recommendation of counsel for the commission, the complaint, and staff recommendations, as well as any written statements submitted by the respondent and any oral statements made at the hearing. No testimony or other evidence will be accepted at the hearing.
(f) At its meeting to determine probable cause, the commission may continue its determination to allow further investigation; may order the issuance of a public report of its investigation if it finds no probable cause to believe that there has been a violation of this chapter or chapter 104, concluding the matter before it; may order a final, public hearing of the complaint if it finds probable cause to believe that there has been a violation of this chapter or chapter 104; or may take such other action as it deems necessary to resolve the complaint, consistent with due process of law. In making its determination, the commission may consider:
1. The sufficiency of the evidence against the respondent, as contained in the investigator’s report;
2. The admissions and other stipulations of the respondent, if any;
3. The nature and circumstances of the respondent’s actions;
4. The expense of further proceedings; and
5. Such other factors as it deems material to its decision.

If the commission finds probable cause, the commission shall determine what charges shall be at issue.

(g) If no probable cause is found, the commission shall dismiss the case and the case shall become a matter of public record, except as otherwise provided in this section, together with a written statement of the findings of the preliminary investigation and a summary of the facts which the commission shall send to the complainant and the alleged violator. A finding of no probable cause by the commission is a full adjudication of all such matters. The commission may not charge a respondent in a subsequent complaint alleging violations based upon the same actions, nonactions, or circumstances wherein the commission found no probable cause.
(h) If probable cause is found, the commission shall so notify the complainant and the alleged violator in writing. All documents made or received in the disposition of the complaint shall become public records upon a finding by the commission.
(i)1. Upon a commission finding of probable cause, the counsel for the commission shall attempt to reach a consent agreement with the respondent. At any time, the commission may enter into a consent order with a respondent without requiring the respondent to admit to a violation of law within the jurisdiction of the commission.
2. A consent agreement is not binding upon either party unless and until it is signed by the respondent and by counsel for the commission upon approval by the commission.
3. Nothing herein shall be construed to prevent the commission from entering into a consent agreement with a respondent prior to a commission finding of probable cause if a respondent indicates in writing a desire to enter into negotiations directed towards reaching such a consent agreement. Any consent agreement reached under this subparagraph is subject to the provisions of subparagraph 2. and shall have the same force and effect as a consent agreement reached after the commission finding of probable cause.
(j) If a consent agreement is reached between the commission and the respondent, counsel for the commission shall send a copy of the signed agreement to both complainant and respondent.

In a case where probable cause is found, the commission shall make a preliminary determination to consider the matter or to refer the matter to the state attorney for the judicial circuit in which the alleged violation occurred. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this section, the commission may, at its discretion, dismiss any complaint at any stage of disposition if it determines that the public interest would not be served by proceeding further, in which case the commission shall issue a public report stating with particularity its reasons for the dismissal.

(5) A person alleged by the Elections Commission to have committed a violation of this chapter or chapter 104 may elect, as a matter of right, within 30 days after the date of the filing of the commission’s allegations, to have a formal administrative hearing conducted by an administrative law judge in the Division of Administrative Hearings. The administrative law judge in such proceedings shall enter a final order, which may include the imposition of civil penalties, subject to appeal as provided in s. 120.68. If the person does not elect to have a hearing by an administrative law judge and does not elect to resolve the complaint by a consent order, the person is entitled to a formal or informal hearing conducted before the commission.
(6) It is the duty of a state attorney receiving a complaint referred by the commission to investigate the complaint promptly and thoroughly; to undertake such criminal or civil actions as are justified by law; and to report to the commission the results of such investigation, the action taken, and the disposition thereof. The failure or refusal of a state attorney to prosecute or to initiate action upon a complaint or a referral by the commission shall not bar further action by the commission under this chapter.
(7) Every sworn complaint filed pursuant to this chapter with the commission, every investigation and investigative report or other paper of the commission with respect to a violation of this chapter or chapter 104, and every proceeding of the commission with respect to a violation of this chapter or chapter 104 is confidential, is exempt from the provisions of ss. 119.07(1) and 286.011, and is exempt from publication in the Florida Administrative Register of any notice or agenda with respect to any proceeding relating to such violation, except under the following circumstances:
(a) As provided in subsection (6);
(b) Upon a determination of probable cause or no probable cause by the commission; or
(c) For proceedings conducted with respect to appeals of fines levied by filing officers for the late filing of reports required by this chapter.

However, a complainant is not bound by the confidentiality provisions of this section. In addition, confidentiality may be waived in writing by the person against whom the complaint has been filed or the investigation has been initiated. If a finding of probable cause in a case is entered within 30 days prior to the date of the election with respect to which the alleged violation occurred, such finding and the proceedings and records relating to such case shall not become public until noon of the day following such election. When two or more persons are being investigated by the commission with respect to an alleged violation of this chapter or chapter 104, the commission may not publicly enter a finding of probable cause or no probable cause in the case until a finding of probable cause or no probable cause for the entire case has been determined. However, once the confidentiality of any case has been breached, the person or persons under investigation have the right to waive the confidentiality of the case, thereby opening up the proceedings and records to the public. Any person who discloses any information or matter made confidential by the provisions of this subsection commits a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083.

(8) Any person who files a complaint pursuant to this section while knowing that the allegations contained in such complaint are false or without merit commits a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083.
(9) The commission shall maintain a database of all final orders and agency actions. Such database shall be available to the public and shall be maintained in such a manner as to be searchable, at a minimum, by issue, statutes, individuals, or entities referenced.
History.s. 25, ch. 73-128; s. 11, ch. 74-200; s. 60, ch. 77-175; s. 3, ch. 78-403; s. 1, ch. 82-46; s. 2, ch. 83-265; s. 39, ch. 84-302; s. 20, ch. 89-256; ss. 5, 14, 15, ch. 90-338; s. 21, ch. 90-360; s. 18, ch. 91-107; s. 5, ch. 91-429; s. 26, ch. 96-406; s. 49, ch. 97-13; s. 34, ch. 98-129; s. 21, ch. 2004-252; s. 48, ch. 2007-30; s. 16, ch. 2010-167; s. 70, ch. 2011-40; s. 1, ch. 2013-14.

F.S. 106.25 on Google Scholar

F.S. 106.25 on CourtListener

Amendments to 106.25


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 106.25
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

S106.25 7 - INVADE PRIVACY - DISCLOSE CONFIDENTIAL ELECTION INFORMATION - M: F
S106.25 8 - FRAUD-FALSE STATEMENT - FILE FALSE ALLEGATION CAMPAIGN FINANCE MATTERS - M: F

Cases Citing Statute 106.25

Total Results: 14  |  Sort by: Relevance  |  Newest First

Copy

Browning v. Florida Hometown Democracy, Inc., 29 So. 3d 1053 (Fla. 2010).

Cited 8 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 35 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 120, 2010 Fla. LEXIS 217, 2010 WL 546768

...With regard to prosecution and enforcement efforts: section 16.56(1)(a)12., Florida Statutes (2007), vests the Office of Statewide Prosecution with concurrent jurisdiction to investigate and prosecute any criminal offense "involving . . . issue petition activities"; section 106.25(1), Florida Statutes (2007), vests the Florida Elections Commission with concurrent authority to investigate violations of chapter 104; section 106.25(6) obligates the appropriate state attorney to investigate and, if necessary, prosecute complaints referred by the Florida Elections Commission; section 106.27(1), Florida Statutes (2007), provides that "[c]riminal proceedings for violations of ....
Copy

Fugate v. Florida Elections Com'n, 924 So. 2d 74 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 2439, 2006 WL 407074

...PER CURIAM. Appellant was charged with "willfully" violating section 104.31(1)(a), Florida Statutes (2003), which forbids a public official from using his or her official authority or influence for the purpose of influencing another person's vote. See § 106.25(3), Fla....
...Chapter 104. On the other hand, the Commission argues that this Court should defer to its application of section 106.37 to alleged violations of Chapter 104 because the Commission is charged with enforcing both Chapters 104 and 106 and because it is section 106.25(3) which engrafts the "willfulness" requirement upon alleged violations of Chapter 104....
Copy

Bloch v. Del Rey, 208 So. 3d 189 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 15905

campaign financing laws. See section 106.25, Fla. Stat. (2016). However, given our disposition
Copy

Snipes v. Florida Elections Comm'n, 19 So. 3d 1178 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 15792, 2009 WL 3364936

...Prohibition lies to prevent a lower tribunal from acting in excess of its jurisdiction, but not to prevent an erroneous exercise of jurisdiction. See English v. McCrary, 348 So.2d 293 (Fla. 1977). The Elections Commission has the power to investigate election code violations. See § 106.25(1), Fla....
Copy

Florida Elections Comm'n v. Davis, 44 So. 3d 1211 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 14875, 2010 WL 3783436

...ty—to levy a civil penalty against a former candidate found guilty of five violations of the election code. We affirm. Until the Legislature enacted chapter 2007-30, section 48, Laws of Florida, the Florida Elections Commission had the option under section 106.25(5), Florida Statutes (2006), of hearing matters itself, after probable cause was determined, or of referring them for formal hearing at the Division of Administrative Hearings (just as the Administrative Procedure Act still provides in...
...ission" found by the administrative law judge to constitute a violation. Celestin v. Florida Elections Com'n, 858 So.2d 382, 383 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003). See also McGann v. Florida Elections Com'n, 803 So.2d 763, 766 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001). The amendment to section 106.25(5) that chapter 2007-30, section 48 enacted changed this procedure without mentioning penalties....
...Stat. (2006). But summary hearings require the agreement of all (original) parties to the proceeding, which would mean here the agreement not only of the Commission, but of Mr. Davis, as well. [2] See § 120.574(1), Fla. Stat. (2006). As provided by section 106.25(5), the present case ended up at the Division of Administrative Hearings because of Mr. Davis's inaction, not because of his agreement. Once there, moreover, the statute directed that "a formal administrative hearing conducted by an administrative law judge in the Division of Administrative Hearings" take place. § 106.25(5), Fla....
...[3] The Commission rejects the suggestion *1215 that it impose sanctions for election code violations itself, after the administrative law judge rules, as unworkable, and in any event at odds with the statutory directive that the administrative law judge "shall enter a final order." § 106.25(5), Fla....
Copy

Florida Elections Comm'n v. Blair, 52 So. 3d 9 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 18651, 2010 WL 4967709

...bited by Chapter 104 or 106, F.S., or whether he or she failed to perform an act required by Chapter 104 or 106, F.S. Fla. Admin. Code R. 2B-1.002. The "rulemaking authority" cited for the rule is section 106.26; the "law implemented" by the rule is section 106.25(3)....
...r" sworn complaints necessarily involves an evaluation of whether the conduct alleged in the complaint amounts to a "willful" violation of chapter 106. We agree. The Commission has jurisdiction to investigate and determine violations of chapter 106. § 106.25(1), Fla. Stat. The Commission is required to investigate alleged violations upon receipt of a sworn complaint. § 106.25(2), Fla. Stat. If the Commission's executive director determines that the complaint is legally sufficient, the Commission conducts an investigation to determine whether there is "probable cause to believe that a violation has occurred." § 106.25(4), Fla. Stat. If the Commission finds probable cause, the alleged violator may elect to have a hearing before the Commission or may elect to resolve the complaint by consent order. § 106.25(5), Fla....
...If neither election is made within 30 days of the finding of probable cause, the matter is referred to DOAH for a proceeding in which the final order is issued by an ALJ, not the Commission. Id. ; see also Fla. Elections Comm'n v. Davis, 44 So.3d 1211 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) (discussing the 2007 amendments to section 106.25(5) that provided DOAH final order authority in cases involving violations of chapter 106)....
...violation as part of its duty to "consider" sworn complaints and determine whether there is probable cause to believe that a statutory violation has occurred. This necessarily requires the Commission to interpret and apply the term "willful" because section 106.25(3) provides that, for purposes of the Commission's jurisdiction, "a violation shall mean the willful performance of an act prohibited by this chapter....
...provisions of the law implemented . . . ." The "law implemented" is the "language of the enabling statute being carried out or interpreted by an agency through rulemaking." § 120.52(9), Fla. Stat. Here, the law being implemented by rule 2B-1.002 is section 106.25(3), which provides: For the purposes of commission jurisdiction, a violation shall mean the willful performance of an act prohibited by this chapter or chapter 104 or the willful failure to perform an act required by this chapter or chapter 104....
...fore the commission. (emphasis added). The ALJ determined that the rule contravenes this statute because it prescribes a legal definition of "willful" even though the statute provides that willfulness is a determination of fact. The last sentence of section 106.25(3), including the language emphasized above, was added to the statute in 2007....
..." Id. at 32-33 (quoting Peoples Bank v. State, 395 So.2d 521, 525 (Fla. 1981)). With this background in mind, we turn to the issue framed by the ALJ's ruling: whether the Commission's adoption of a rule defining "willful" contravenes the language in section 106.25(3) providing that "[w]illfulness is a determination of fact." We conclude that it does not. Unlike the ALJ and Appellee, we do not construe the repeal of section 106.37 and the amendments to section 106.25(3) as either a legislative prohibition against the adoption of a definition of "willful" by rule or an indication of a legislative preference that there not be a uniform standard against which alleged violations of chapter 106 would be judged....
...Moreover, in light of the clear, long-standing legislative preference that agency policies be expressed in rules, [5] it seems unlikely that the Legislature would have intended that the legal definition of "willful" be developed through adjudication. In any event, we see no inconsistency between the language in section 106.25(3) and the adoption of a definition of "willful" by rule....
...The rule simply defines the legal standard that will be applied by the factfinder, whether that is the Commission in determining probable cause or the ALJ in determining whether the violation was proven at the hearing. The adoption of the legal standard by rule does not contravene section 106.25(3) because the factfinder's determination of whether the legal standard has been met will be made based upon the evidence presented in each case....
Copy

Cullen v. Cheal, 586 So. 2d 1228 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 9122, 1991 WL 181459

materia with the remainder of chapter 106. Section 106.25 vests the enforcement power for chapter 106
Copy

Florida Elections Comm'n v. Valliere, 45 So. 3d 506 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 13628, 2010 WL 3564726

...The Vallieres cross appeal that portion of the order finding Susan guilty of two violations and James guilty of one. We affirm and write to address one issue raised in the cross appeal. Appellees argue for a narrow construction of the term "hearsay" in section 106.25(2), Florida Statutes (2008), which provides in pertinent part: The commission shall investigate all violations of this chapter and chapter 104, but only after having received either a sworn complaint or information reported to it under this subsection by the Division of Elections....
...Such sworn complaint must be based upon personal information or information other than hearsay. (Emphasis added). The italicized portion of the statute became effective on January 1, 2008. Ch.2007-30, Laws of Fla. §§ 48, 57. Appellees contend that, as used in section 106.25(2), the term "hearsay" is defined by the evidence code, as being a "statement, other than one made by the declarant while testifying at the trial or hearing, offered in evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted." § 90.801(1)(c), Fla. Stat. (2008). Thus, according to appellees, a complainant could not base a complaint upon a campaign treasurer's report, because the report is a "classic example" of hearsay. The administrative law judge rejected appellees' narrow reading of section 106.25(2)....
...ule 1.510, Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, which requires that affidavits be based on "personal knowledge [and] shall set forth such facts as would be admissible in evidence...." The administrative law judge's construction of the term "hearsay" in section 106.25(2) is well taken....
...Longboat Key Beach Erosion Control Dist., 604 So.2d 452, 455 (Fla.1992). A court should not interpret the term "hearsay" in a way that leads "to an unreasonable result or ridiculous conclusion." Holly v. Auld, 450 So.2d 217, 219 (Fla.1984). Reading the section 90.801 definition of "hearsay" into section 106.25(2) would lead to an absurd result....
...business records or statements by a candidate himself admitting to a campaign violation. Instead of the absurd results that would arise from application of the technical definition of "hearsay" in the evidence code, the legislature used the term in section 106.25(2) according to its common usage....
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 2003).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

educational."7 Section 99.193 was replaced by section 106.025, Florida Statutes (1978 Supplement), which
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1977).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

public record and subject to Ch. 119, F. S. Section 106.25, F. S. 1975, provides the procedures through
Copy

Jennings v. Florida Elections Comm'n, 932 So. 2d 609 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 10788, 2006 WL 1791710

recommended order, the Florida Legislature amended section 106.25 to expressly restrict the Commission’s ability
Copy

Zimmerman v. Florida Elections Comm'n, 373 So. 2d 58 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15177

Commission replies that the hearing authorized by Section 106.25(3), Florida Statutes (1975), was only investigatory
Copy

Day v. State, 977 So. 2d 664 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2008 WL 463243

...Does "actions" include or exclude a criminal prosecution? To answer this question, we have examined the whole of chapter 106. We have found two instances in chapter 106 where the Legislature refers to a criminal prosecution as an "action." The first appears in section 106.25(6), where there is a reference to "criminal or civil actions." The second appears in section 106.27, where, in reference to "criminal proceedings," the Legislature calls this "any such action." There is, therefore, no basis to conclude that section 106.28 only applies to civil violations created in chapter 106....
Copy

Towbin v. Antonacci, 287 F.R.D. 672 (S.D. Fla. 2012).

Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 187656, 2012 WL 6582946

privileged, both as confidential under Fla. Stat. § 106.25(7) and as work product. Defendants contend that

This Florida statute resource is curated by Graham W. Syfert, Esq., a Jacksonville, Florida personal injury and workers' compensation attorney. For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.