Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 101.71 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 101.71 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 101.71

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title IX
ELECTORS AND ELECTIONS
Chapter 101
VOTING METHODS AND PROCEDURE
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 101.71
101.71 Polling place.
(1) There shall be in each precinct in each county one polling place which shall be accessible to the public on election day and is managed by a board of inspectors and clerk of election. Only one elector shall be allowed to enter any voting booth at a time; no one except inspectors shall be allowed to speak to the elector while casting his or her vote; and no inspector shall speak to or interfere with the elector concerning his or her voting, except to perform the duties as such inspector. Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, this section shall be applicable where the computer method of voting is in use, and adequate provision shall be made for the privacy of the elector while casting his or her vote.
(2) Notwithstanding subsection (1), whenever the supervisor of elections of any county determines that the accommodations for holding any election at a polling place designated for any precinct in the county are unavailable, are inadequate for the expeditious and efficient housing and handling of voting and voting paraphernalia, or do not comply with the requirements of s. 101.715, the supervisor shall, not less than 30 days before the holding of an election, provide for the voting place for such precinct to be moved to another site that is accessible to the public on election day in said precinct or, if such is not available, to another site that is accessible to the public on election day in a contiguous precinct. If such action of the supervisor results in the voting place for two or more precincts being located for the purposes of an election in one building, the supervisor of elections shall provide adequate supplies, equipment, and personnel are available to accommodate the voters for the precincts that are collocated. When any supervisor moves any polling place pursuant to this subsection, the supervisor shall, not more than 30 days or fewer than 7 days before the holding of an election, give notice of the change of the polling place for the precinct involved, with clear description of the voting place to which changed, by publication on the county’s website as provided in s. 50.0311, on the supervisor’s website, or at least once in a newspaper of general circulation in the county. A notice of the change of the polling place involved shall be mailed at least 14 days before an election to each registered elector or to each household in which there is a registered elector.
(3) In cases of emergency and when time does not permit compliance with subsection (2), the supervisor of elections shall designate a new polling place which shall be accessible to the public on election day and shall cause a notice to be posted at the old polling place advising the electors of the location of the new polling place.
(4) Each polling place shall be conspicuously identified by a sign, on or near the premises of the polling place, designating the polling place by precinct number. Such sign shall be large enough to be clearly visible to occupants of passing vehicular traffic on roadways contiguous to the polling place, with letters no smaller than 3 inches high, and shall be displayed at all times while the polls are open on any election day.
(5) Public, tax-supported buildings must be made available for use as polling places, or early voting locations that meet the requirements specified in s. 101.657, upon the request of the supervisor of elections.
History.s. 22, ch. 3879, 1889; RS 176; s. 26, ch. 4328, 1895; s. 1, ch. 4699, 1899; GS 208; RGS 252; CGL 308; s. 5, ch. 26870, 1951; s. 1, ch. 57-385; s. 3, ch. 67-530; s. 4, ch. 69-281; s. 23, ch. 77-175; s. 4, ch. 78-188; s. 2, ch. 80-189; s. 12, ch. 80-292; s. 1, ch. 85-38; s. 593, ch. 95-147; s. 25, ch. 2001-40; s. 15, ch. 2002-281; s. 10, ch. 2010-167; s. 32, ch. 2023-120.
Note.Former s. 99.06.

F.S. 101.71 on Google Scholar

F.S. 101.71 on Casetext

Amendments to 101.71


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 101.71
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 101.71.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

HADLEY, v. KELLOGG SALES COMPANY,, 273 F. Supp. 3d 1052 (N.D. Cal. 2017)

. . . . § 101.71(a), “[h]ealth claims [are] not authorized” that link “[d]ietary fiber and cardiovascular disease . . . .” 21 C.F.R. § 101.71(a). . . . Second,' under 21 C.F.R. § 101.77, despite § 101.71(a), a food manufacturer may make health claims that . . . heart healthy and fiber statements because Plaintiff had alleged a “bare technical violation” of § 101.71 . . .

HADLEY, v. KELLOGG SALES COMPANY,, 243 F. Supp. 3d 1074 (N.D. Cal. 2017)

. . . . § 101.71(a). . . . First, under 21 C.F.R. § 101.71(a), “[h]ealth claims [are] not authorized” that link “[d]ietary fíber . . . and cardiovascular disease.” 21 C.F.R. § 101.71(a). . . . M ¶ 302, The Court first addresses whether Plaintiff has alleged a violation of §§ 101.14 and 101.71( . . . Thus, Plaintiff must do more than simply state that the claim at issue violated § 101.71(a). . . .

MPHJ TECHNOLOGY INVESTMENTS, LLC, v. H. SORRELL,, 108 F. Supp. 3d 231 (D. Vt. 2015)

. . . Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice § 101.71 (3d ed.2003)). . . .

J. ELLIS, v. WILKINSON,, 81 F. Supp. 3d 229 (E.D.N.Y. 2015)

. . . Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice § 101.71 (3d Ed.2003)) (alteration in original)). . . .

SC NOTE ACQUISITIONS, LLC, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N. A. LNR LLC,, 934 F. Supp. 2d 516 (E.D.N.Y. 2013)

. . . Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice § 101.71 (3d Ed. 2003)) (alteration in original)). . . .

NEW YORK, v. UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS W. B. U. S. v. W. B. U. S. v. U. S., 896 F. Supp. 2d 180 (E.D.N.Y. 2012)

. . . Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice § 101.71 (3d Ed.2003) (“The doctrines of ripeness and standing are intertwined . . .

In A. WISE D., 453 B.R. 220 (Bankr. D. Vt. 2011)

. . . showing current charges of $151.63 for the electric utility as of April 15, 2011, and current charges of $101.71 . . .

CAPELLA UNIVERSITY, INC. v. EXECUTIVE RISK SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, J. Co. J., 617 F.3d 1040 (8th Cir. 2010)

. . . . § 101.71 (permitting presiding hearing officer to require written statements of position). . . .

TROIANO, v. SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS IN PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA,, 382 F.3d 1276 (11th Cir. 2004)

. . . . § 101.71(2), for failing to timely notify voters of the availability of accessible voting machines . . .

BRENNAN, J. v. NASSAU COUNTY, a, 352 F.3d 60 (2d Cir. 2003)

. . . Moore et al., Moore's Federal Practice § 101.71 (3d ed.2003) (“The doctrines of ripeness and standing . . .

CENTRAL STATES, SOUTHEAST AND SOUTHWEST AREAS PENSION FUND, v. HUNT TRUCK LINES, INC., 133 F. Supp. 2d 1076 (N.D. Ill. 2000)

. . . For local counsel, the following costs will not be allowed: (1) March 1, 1999 invoice — auto rental ($101.71 . . .

PEARSON v. E. SHALALA,, 164 F.3d 650 (D.C. Cir. 1999)

. . . . § 101.71(a) (dietary fiber-cancer), § 101.71(c) (antioxidant vitamins-cancer), § 101.71(e) (omega-3 . . . Reg. at 405, and did not consider their use in the four sub-regulations before us, see 21 C.F.R. § 101.71 . . . issue can be remedied by disclaimers and thus does not answer whether the subregulations, 21 C.F.R. § 101.71 . . . For the foregoing reasons, we hold invalid the four sub-regulations, 21 C.F.R. § 101.71(a), (c), (e); . . .

W. FULTZ v. S. DUNN, Jr. L. M. S. Jr. L. No. W. No. v. S. Jr. M., 165 F.3d 215 (3d Cir. 1998)

. . . Code § 101.71 which provides as follows: (a) Seniority as used in this part shall be continuous service . . . seniority is lost whenever there is a break in an employee’s service of more than one year, 4 Pa.Code § 101.71 . . .

In LAUBE, Jr., 152 B.R. 260 (Bank. W.D. Wis. 1993)

. . . . §§ 75.143, 75.195, 75.521(3m) (Tax Sales); § 101.71(2) (Manufactured Building Code); § 151.01(2) (" . . .

ROSENBERG v. UNITED STATES, 3 Cl. Ct. 432 (Cl. Ct. 1983)

. . . machinery and equipment received from Chicago Metals from a depreciated cost of $189,094.29 to $65,-101.71 . . .

GULF STATES MANUFACTURERS, INC. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD,, 598 F.2d 896 (5th Cir. 1979)

. . . . § 101.71. . . . .

SANDERS v. ANDREWS, 121 F. Supp. 584 (W.D. Okla. 1954)

. . . should be added the payment of retained percentage in the amount of $1,001.71, making a total of $955,-101.71 . . . $940,000 plus $14,100 bond premium and $1,001.71 payment of retained percentage, or a total of $955,-101.71 . . .

H. v. H., 52 U.S. 461 (U.S. 1850)

. . . .: — Paid bricklayers for extra work, . . . . . 101.71 Removing fence, . . . . . , . 7.00 Grading the . . .