The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE

Chapter 76
ATTACHMENT

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 76.01

76.01 Right to attachment.—Any creditor may have an attachment at law against the goods and chattels, lands, and tenements of his or her debtor under the circumstances and in the manner hereinafter provided.

History.—RS 1635; GS 2099; RGS 3400; CGL 5253; s. 26, ch. 67-254; s. 370, ch. 95-147.

F.S. 76.01 on Google Scholar

F.S. 76.01 on Casetext

Amendments to 76.01

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 76.01

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 76.01.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, v. WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE G., 360 F. Supp. 3d 861 (W.D. Wis. 2019)

. . . . § 76.01. . . . Stat. § 76.01. . . . Accordingly, the court is unable to determine precisely how much of the taxes levied against § 76.01 . . . Taxed Railroads Companies against all Taxes under under § 76.01 Taxed under Companies Levied § 76.01 . . . Stat. § 76.01. Even certain air carriers are not actually assessed under Chapter 76. See Wis. . . .

IN RE SPENCE, E. v. L. L. D. S. C. N. LLC,, 554 B.R. 467 (B.A.P. 8th Cir. 2016)

. . . P. 76.01. . . .

IN RE SPENCE, v., 545 B.R. 280 (Bankr. W.D. Mo. 2016)

. . . P.76.01. . Mo.Rev.Stat. § 513.010.1. . Mo. R. Civ. P. 76.06(c). . Mo. R. Civ. P. 76.07. . Mo, R. . . .

VMI ENTERTAINMENT, LLC, a v. WESTWOOD PLAZA, LLC GM LLC, 152 So. 3d 617 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . Section 76.01, Florida Statutes (2013), provides that “[a]ny creditor may have an attachment at law against . . . Therefore, the plain language of section 76.01 does not answer the question presented in this appeal. . . . more specific to alcoholic beverage licenses, precludes attachment of such a license, even if section 76.01 . . .

SOLIS, v. WEBB,, 931 F. Supp. 2d 936 (N.D. Cal. 2012)

. . . The ESOP acquired 90.03% of EVI’s shares on November 21, 2002, at $76.01 per share for a total cost of . . . She bases this assertion on the belief that CFI’s direction to purchase the stock at $76.01 per share . . . The appraisal used to value EVI’s stock at $76.01 per share on November 21, 2002, allegedly contained . . .

NOVENTA OCHO LLC, a v. PBD PROPERTIES LLC, a E., 284 F. App'x 726 (11th Cir. 2008)

. . . . §§ 76.01-25; Frasher v. Fox Distrib. of Sw. . . .

PAPADOPOULOS v. SIDI, 547 F. Supp. 2d 1262 (S.D. Fla. 2008)

. . . . §§ 76.01 et. seq.; Fla. Stat. §§ 77.01 et. seq.; Barbouti v. . . .

J. COONTS, M. v. POTTS, Sr., 316 F.3d 745 (8th Cir. 2003)

. . . must file an application for a writ of execution, and the court clerk may issue the writ under Rules 76.01 . . .

In EUFAULA INDUSTRIAL AUTHORITY, v. N. A. N. A. a, 266 B.R. 483 (B.A.P. 10th Cir. 2001)

. . . Wells submitted invoices totaling $183,867.80, of which $139,759.46, or 76.01%, was paid by the Trust . . .

CENTRAL BANK OF TAMPA, a v. UNITED STATES, 833 F. Supp. 892 (M.D. Fla. 1993)

. . . See, § 76.01 et seq., and § 77.031, Florida Statutes (1991). . . .

LUSKIN v. LUSKIN,, 616 So. 2d 556 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . The Luskins conclude that the rule in Cerna should apply to executions as well because section 76.01, . . . Section 76.01 provides that “[a]ny creditor may have an attachment at law against the goods and chattels . . . Unlike section 76.01, the list of items in section 56.061 does include certain papers and documents of . . .

In MURRAY INDUSTRIES, INC. MURRAY INDUSTRIES, INC. v. NORWEST BANK MINNEAPOLIS, N. A., 105 B.R. 96 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1989)

. . . The statute dealing with this subject in this State, Fla.Stat. 76.01, et seq., does not authorize the . . . neither supported by general legal principles governing attachments in general, nor by Fla.Stat. § 76.01 . . .

KONOVER REALTY ASSOCIATES, LTD. v. MLADEN,, 511 So. 2d 705 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . . §§ 76.01-.32, Fla.Stat. (1985); Leight, 483 So.2d at 476. . . .

ESTUDIOS, PROYECTOS E INVERSIONES DE CENTRO AMERICA, S. A. EPICA v. SWISS BANK CORPORATION OVERSEAS S. A., 507 So. 2d 1119 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . .” § 76.01, Fla.Stat. (1985). . . .

CERNA, v. SWISS BANK CORPORATION OVERSEAS S. A., 503 So. 2d 1297 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . discovery fall within the statutory definition of “goods and chattels, lands and tenements” under section 76.01 . . .

LEIGHT, v. BERKMAN, 483 So. 2d 476 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . Attachment, as authorized by Section 76.01, et. seq., Fla.Stat. (1983), provides the obvious remedy for . . .

TRANSPORTES AEREOS MERCANTILES PANAMERICANOS, S. A. v. BANCO CAFETERO,, 451 So. 2d 932 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . motions for a Writ of Attachment and a Writ of Garnishment should be granted forthwith, pursuant to FS §§ 76.01 . . .

BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD CO. Co. Co. Co. B. St. Co. v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE OF STATE OF WISCONSIN,, 570 F. Supp. 585 (W.D. Wis. 1983)

. . . . §§ 76.01, 76.02(10). . . .

FINE, v. E. FINE,, 400 So. 2d 1254 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . . § 76.01, Fla.Stat. (1979). . . .

DE JONG PACKING COMPANY, Mt. Co. v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, HYGRADE FOOD PRODUCTS CORPORATION, v. UNITED STATES,, 618 F.2d 1329 (9th Cir. 1980)

. . . Antitrust Law: An Economic Perspective 207 (1976); von Kalinowski, 11 Antitrust Laws and Trade Regulation ¶ 76.01 . . .

AAA v. FLORIDA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, 48 Fla. Supp. 143 (Martin Cty. Cir. Ct. 1978)

. . . This was followed in 1976 with a holding that Florida’s attachment statute, FSA §76.01, et. seq., was . . .

ITT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, a v. BARTON, a k a A., 457 F. Supp. 224 (M.D. Fla. 1978)

. . . attachment on defendants’ real property on the ground that the Florida attachment statute, Section 76.01 . . .

STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, v. PAN AMERICAN CONSTRUCTION CO., 338 So. 2d 1291 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

. . . The rules challenged are in Chapter 14, Florida Administrative Code; specifically, 14-76.01 through .06 . . . “Although the Petitioners claim they are challenging the validity of Rules 14-76.01 through .06, F.A.C . . .

PITTS, v. CATES v. D. BUSBEE,, 536 F.2d 56 (5th Cir. 1976)

. . . consist of the following Census Tracts of such county: Tracts 66.01, 66.02, 68, 70, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76.01 . . .

S. MARK, v. McDONNELL CO., 447 F.2d 847 (7th Cir. 1971)

. . . He actually loaned 4301 American Home shares and paid $38,005 at the rate of $76.01 per share to defendant . . .

PAPADAKOS, v. H. SPOONER J., 186 So. 2d 786 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1966)

. . . In § 76.01 Fla.Stat., F.S.A. the Legislature has stated that any creditor may have an attachment at law . . .

J. CRAVEN, v. ASSOCIATED TRANSPORT, INC. R., 40 F.R.D. 8 (D.S.C. 1966)

. . . of practical information on the day-to-day problems of Federal jury trials” the authors include: § 76.01 . . .

FLORIDA INSURANCE EXCHANGE, v. ADLER, 174 So. 2d 75 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1965)

. . . Section 76.01, Fla.Stat., F.S.A. . . .

UNITED STATES v. WEST TEXAS STATE BANK, 233 F. Supp. 130 (N.D. Tex. 1964)

. . . . § 76.01) U. S. v. Scott [8 Cir.], 167 F.2d 301. . . .