CopyCited 40 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 155 Fla. 129, 1944 Fla. LEXIS 486
sheriff responsible for their negligent acts. Section
30.01, same statutes, requires the sheriff to post
CopyCited 37 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 5046, 1992 WL 41269
basis for application of this provision”); U.S.S.G. § 30.1, appl. note 1 (1990) ("A defendant’s denial of
CopyCited 33 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
5 McCarthy on Trademarks and Unfair Competition § 30:1 (5th ed. 2018) [hereinafter "McCarthy"] (describing
CopyCited 32 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 12005, 1989 WL 90077
obstructed the administration of justice under § 30.1. Accordingly he may not have been entitled to a
CopyCited 30 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal
appellees introduced two county ordinances, Section 30-1(46) and 30-27 of the Metropolitan Dade County
CopyCited 20 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 9369, 1995 WL 521106
DCA 1993)(quoting Manual on Complex Litigation 2d § 30.1 (1985)). That is so because the granting of class
CopyCited 10 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida
establish refuges is defined by Article IV, Section 30 (1), Florida Constitution,[11] which prescribes
CopyCited 10 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1993 WL 496041
in the case." Manual on Complex Litigation 2d, § 30.1 (1985) (1-Pt. 2 Moore's Federal Practice (Sam C
CopyCited 8 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal
124 (1975). We find no provision in 12 U.S.C.A. § 30[1] or any other section of the National Banking Act
CopyCited 5 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 1997 WL 20519
and Policy § 2 (1981); 5 Couch on Insurance 2d § 30:1 (Rev. ed 1984); see also Leggett v. Missouri State
CopyCited 4 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 183, 2007 WL 57571
...by him within the meaning of section
39.01(2), Florida Statutes (2004). The trial court also found E.K. dependent as to the father based upon an unalleged, eleventh-hour DCF argument in its post-trial written submission, that the father abandoned the child within the meaning of section
30.01(1), Florida Statutes (2004), by failing to provide necessities for the child unless asked....
CopyCited 2 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2016 WL 1578492, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 5960
...e
child was always observed to be in good health, clean, and well cared for.
Finally, the record does not contain any competent substantial evidence of
imminent prospective abuse, abandonment, or neglect.5 See B.D. v. Dep't of
5 Fla. Stat. §30.01(15) (f): “Child who is found to be dependent” means a child
who, pursuant to this chapter, is found by the court:
(f) To be at substantial risk of imminent abuse, abandonment, or neglect by the
parent or parents or legal custodians; ....
CopyCited 1 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal
5 50 U.S.C. § 3803. 6 See Ala. Code § 30-1-5 (2018); Alaska Stat. §
20.05.171 (2018); Ariz
CopyPublished | Supreme Court of Florida
2000))); Philip J. Padovano, Florida Civil Practice § 30:1 (2021 ed.) (“Mandamus is a 1. It stands
CopyPublished | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
guilty of larceny.” Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 266, § 30(1). The statute merges, into one statutory
CopyPublished | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 4614
ordered. . The Code of Metropolitan Dade County, § 30-1(34) defines police officer as follows: “Every officer
CopyPublished | Supreme Court of Florida | 1980 Fla. LEXIS 4464
RULE-4-V ARTICLE II REGISTRATION OF LAW STUDENTS Section 30 1. Every person intending to apply for admission
CopyPublished | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5659
very Chapter 30 itself, more particularly in Section 30-1(55): ‘Traffic. Pedestrians, ridden or herded
CopyPublished | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 3352, 2016 WL 830365
...r (2) received notice to depart but failed to do so. Id. The applicable definition of “budding” was “any enclosed structure intended for use as a habitation or for some purpose of trade, manufacture, ornament, or use.” Texas Penal Code -Ann, § 30.01(2) (West 1974).....
CopyPublished | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
illegal shipments prior to exportation.” 15 C.F.R. § 30.1(b). The Department of Homeland Security, Customs
CopyPublished | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1395pp(a)(2); see also 42 C.F.R. § 411.404; MCPM ch. 30, § 30.1. That makes it even more speculative that Banks’s
CopyPublished | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal
...(2) received notice to depart but failed to do so.
Id. The applicable definition of “building” was “any enclosed structure intended for use
as a habitation or for some purpose of trade, manufacture, ornament, or use.” Texas
Penal Code Ann. § 30.01(2) (West 1974)....