Florida/Georgia Personal Injury & Workers Compensation

You're probably overthinking it. Call a lawyer.

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 30.01 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 30.01 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 30.01 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 30.01

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title V
JUDICIAL BRANCH
Chapter 30
SHERIFFS
View Entire Chapter
30.01 Bond of sheriffs; small counties.In each county of the state having a population of 150,000 or less according to the last state census, the sheriff shall give bond as required by the board of county commissioners of the county, to be filed with the clerk of the circuit court and be conditioned upon the faithful discharge of the duties of his or her office. When a sheriff is appointed to fill a vacancy, a bond may not be a prerequisite to succession in office; however, if the county commission requires a bond for the office of sheriff, the commission shall allow a period of 10 days after the effective date of the appointment in which the bond may be provided.
History.ss. 1, 4, ch. 3724, 1887; RS 1237; GS 1666; RGS 2871; CGL 4568; s. 1, ch. 17754, 1937; s. 1, ch. 20719, 1941; ss. 10, 12, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 171, ch. 95-147; s. 14, ch. 95-312; s. 10, ch. 98-34.

F.S. 30.01 on Google Scholar

F.S. 30.01 on CourtListener

Amendments to 30.01


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 30.01

Total Results: 24  |  Sort by: Relevance  |  Newest First

Copy

United States v. Banks, 347 F.3d 1266 (11th Cir. 2003).

Cited 44 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 21197, 2003 WL 22383612

officer before posting bond (which distinguishes § 30.1, cmt. n. 4(h)). While providing a false name and
Copy

Holland v. Mayes, 19 So. 2d 709 (Fla. 1944).

Cited 40 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 155 Fla. 129, 1944 Fla. LEXIS 486

sheriff responsible for their negligent acts. Section 30.01, same statutes, requires the sheriff to post
Copy

United States v. Winton Gardiner, 955 F.2d 1492 (11th Cir. 1992).

Cited 37 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 5046, 1992 WL 41269

basis for application of this provision”); U.S.S.G. § 30.1, appl. note 1 (1990) ("A defendant’s denial of
Copy

Hard Candy, LLC v. Anastasia Beverly Hills, Inc., 921 F.3d 1343 (11th Cir. 2019).

Cited 33 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

5 McCarthy on Trademarks and Unfair Competition § 30:1 (5th ed. 2018) [hereinafter "McCarthy"] (describing
Copy

United States v. Ralph Reginald Cain, 881 F.2d 980 (11th Cir. 1989).

Cited 32 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 12005, 1989 WL 90077

obstructed the administration of justice under § 30.1. Accordingly he may not have been entitled to a
Copy

Metro. Dade Cnty. v. Dillon, 305 So. 2d 36 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974).

Cited 30 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

appellees introduced two county ordinances, Section 30-1(46) and 30-27 of the Metropolitan — Dade County
Copy

Baptist Hosp. of Miami, Inc. v. Demario, 661 So. 2d 319 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995).

Cited 20 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 9369, 1995 WL 521106

DCA 1993)(quoting Manual on Complex Litigation 2d § 30.1 (1985)). That is so because the granting of class
Copy

F.W.F., Inc. v. Detroit Diesel Corp., 494 F. Supp. 2d 1342 (S.D. Fla. 2007).

Cited 20 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48953, 2007 WL 1875785

resorting to extrinsic evidence. 11 LORD, supra, § 30:1 (footnotes omitted). When applying the rules of
Copy

Alford v. Finch, 155 So. 2d 790 (Fla. 1963).

Cited 10 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida

establish refuges is defined by Article IV, Section 30 (1), Florida Constitution,[11] which prescribes
Copy

Barton-Malow Co. v. Bauer, 627 So. 2d 1233 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993).

Cited 10 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1993 WL 496041

in the case." Manual on Complex Litigation 2d, § 30.1 (1985) (1-Pt. 2 Moore's Federal Practice (Sam C
Copy

Centrak Nat. Bank of Miami v. Cent. Bancorp., Inc., 411 So. 2d 358 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).

Cited 8 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

124 (1975). We find no provision in 12 U.S.C.A. § 30[1] or any other section of the National Banking Act
Copy

Perlman v. Prudential Ins. Co., 686 So. 2d 1378 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 1997 WL 20519

and Policy § 2 (1981); 5 Couch on Insurance 2d § 30:1 (Rev. ed 1984); see also Leggett v. Missouri State
Copy

Ek v. Dep't of Child. & Fam., 948 So. 2d 54 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 183, 2007 WL 57571

...by him within the meaning of section 39.01(2), Florida Statutes (2004). The trial court also found E.K. dependent as to the father based upon an unalleged, eleventh-hour DCF argument in its post-trial written submission, that the father abandoned the child within the meaning of section 30.01(1), Florida Statutes (2004), by failing to provide necessities for the child unless asked....
Copy

B.J. v. Dep't of Child. & Families, 190 So. 3d 191 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2016 WL 1578492, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 5960

...e child was always observed to be in good health, clean, and well cared for. Finally, the record does not contain any competent substantial evidence of imminent prospective abuse, abandonment, or neglect.5 See B.D. v. Dep't of 5 Fla. Stat. §30.01(15) (f): “Child who is found to be dependent” means a child who, pursuant to this chapter, is found by the court: (f) To be at substantial risk of imminent abuse, abandonment, or neglect by the parent or parents or legal custodians; ....
Copy

James Farmer v. State of Florida, 268 So. 3d 1009 (Fla. 1st DCA 2019).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

5 50 U.S.C. § 3803. 6 See Ala. Code § 30-1-5 (2018); Alaska Stat. § 20.05.171 (2018); Ariz
Copy

State of Florida v. Brian K. McKenzie (Fla. 2021).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida

2000))); Philip J. Padovano, Florida Civil Practice § 30:1 (2021 ed.) (“Mandamus is a 1. It stands
Copy

Mucktaru Kemokai v. U.S. Attorney Gen. (11th Cir. 2023).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

guilty of larceny.” Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 266, § 30(1). The statute merges, into one statutory
Copy

Florio v. State, 192 So. 2d 289 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1966).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 4614

ordered. . The Code of Metropolitan Dade County, § 30-1(34) defines police officer as follows: “Every officer
Copy

In re Florida Bd. of Bar Examiners, 397 So. 2d 590 (Fla. 1980).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1980 Fla. LEXIS 4464

RULE-4-V ARTICLE II REGISTRATION OF LAW STUDENTS Section 30 1. Every person intending to apply for admission
Copy

Goldstein v. State, 223 So. 2d 354 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1969).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5659

very Chapter 30 itself, more particularly in Section 30-1(55): ‘Traffic. Pedestrians, ridden or herded
Copy

M.M. v. State, 187 So. 3d 300 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 3352, 2016 WL 830365

...r (2) received notice to depart but failed to do so. Id. The applicable definition of “budding” was “any enclosed structure intended for use as a habitation or for some purpose of trade, manufacture, ornament, or use.” Texas Penal Code -Ann, § 30.01(2) (West 1974).....
Copy

United States v. Bryan Evan Singer (11th Cir. 2020).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

illegal shipments prior to exportation.” 15 C.F.R. § 30.1(b). The Department of Homeland Security, Customs
Copy

Edwin R. Banks v. Sec'y, Dep't of Health & Human Servs. (11th Cir. 2022).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

1395pp(a)(2); see also 42 C.F.R. § 411.404; MCPM ch. 30, § 30.1. That makes it even more speculative that Banks’s
Copy

M.M. v. State (Fla. 5th DCA 2016).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal

...(2) received notice to depart but failed to do so. Id. The applicable definition of “building” was “any enclosed structure intended for use as a habitation or for some purpose of trade, manufacture, ornament, or use.” Texas Penal Code Ann. § 30.01(2) (West 1974)....

This Florida statute resource is curated by Graham W. Syfert, Esq., a Jacksonville, Florida personal injury and workers' compensation attorney. For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.