The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title V
JUDICIAL BRANCH

Chapter 28
CLERKS OF THE CIRCUIT COURTS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 28.29

28.29 Recording of orders and judgments.—Orders of dismissal and final judgments of the courts in civil actions, including final judgments for injunctions for protection as provided in chapters 741 and 784, must be recorded in official records. Other orders must be recorded only on written direction of the court. The direction may be by incorporation in the order of the words “To be recorded in official records” or words to that effect. Failure to record an order or judgment does not affect its validity. The certified copy of a judgment, required under s. 55.10 to become a lien on real property, shall be recorded only when presented for recording with the statutory service charge.

History.—ss. 1-3, ch. 23825, 1947; s. 3, ch. 71-4; s. 2, ch. 72-320; s. 3, ch. 2021-231.

F.S. 28.29 on Google Scholar

F.S. 28.29 on Casetext

Amendments to 28.29

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 28.29

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 28.29.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

Dr. SACERDOTE, Dr. E. Dr. B. a NYU v. NEW YORK UNIVERSITY,, 328 F. Supp. 3d 273 (S.D.N.Y. 2018)

. . . the CREF Stock Account was 32.15%; for the VITPX, VIIIX, and Russell 3000, it was 28.92%, 26.66%, and 28.29% . . .

UNITED STATES v. LAWRENCE,, 854 F.3d 462 (8th Cir. 2017)

. . . the vehicle did not have insurance, officers impounded the car and, during an inventory search, found 28.29 . . .

COE, v. TOWN OF BLOOIMING GROVE,, 880 F. Supp. 2d 411 (S.D.N.Y. 2012)

. . . Claimed Gross Hours Awarded Percent Reduction Net Hours Awarded Rate Total Bergstein 125.88 56.58 50% 28.29 . . .

CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC. v. ENTERGY NUCLEAR INDIAN POINT LLC, v., 676 F.3d 1331 (Fed. Cir. 2012)

. . . facility: 30.58 metric tons uranium (“MTU”) in 1998; 32.74 MTU in 1999; 27.0 MTU in 2000; 0 MTU in 2001; 28.29 . . .

CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC. v. ENTERGY NUCLEAR INDIAN POINT LLC, v., 676 F.3d 1331 (Fed. Cir. 2012)

. . . facility: 30.58 metric tons uranium (“MTU”) in 1998; 32.74 MTU in 1999; 27.0 MTU in 2000; 0 MTU in 2001; 28.29 . . .

WESTLAKE INVESTMENTS, LLC, v. MLP MANAGEMENT, LLC MLP L. L. C. CCC MLP LLC LLC, MLP LLC LP MLP LLC CCC LLC CCC MLP LLC, MLP LLC MLP LLC CCC MLP LLC LLC LP, v. LLC R R C. TKP E., 842 F. Supp. 2d 1119 (S.D. Iowa 2012)

. . . Perilla, Cor-bin on Contracts § 28.29 at 126, 137 (Rev. ed. 1993). 2. . . .

LIFESTYLE ENTERPRISE, INC. LLC, s d b a LLC, Co. Co. Co. v. UNITED STATES,, 768 F. Supp. 2d 1286 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2011)

. . . In order by size: 1) Maitland Smith: Overhead ("OH”) Ratio 28.29%; Selling, General, and Administrative . . .

UNITED STATES F. MILLER F. v. BILL HARBERT INTERNATIONAL CONSTRUCTION, INC., 608 F.3d 871 (D.C. Cir. 2010)

. . . No. 110-507, at 28.29 (2008) (report on the False Claims Correction Act of 2008, a FERA predecessor). . . .

CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC. LLC, v. UNITED STATES,, 92 Fed. Cl. 466 (Fed. Cl. 2010)

. . . MTU) in 1998; 72 assemblies (32.74 MTU) in 1999; 60 assemblies (27.00 MTU) in 2000; 63 assemblies (28.29 . . .

GOPLEN, On v. INC. W. On v., 453 F. Supp. 2d 759 (S.D.N.Y. 2006)

. . . 51job shares increased significantly in the period following the November 4, 2004 press release — from $28.29 . . .

CITY OF AUSTIN POLICE RETIREMENT SYSTEM, v. ITT EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, INC. R. E. M. D. W. V. N. E. P., 388 F. Supp. 2d 932 (S.D. Ind. 2005)

. . . this disclosure, ITT’s stock price dropped from a closing price on March 8th of $34.87 per share, to $28.29 . . .

AUSA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, v. ERNST YOUNG,, 119 F. Supp. 2d 386 (S.D.N.Y. 2000)

. . . (See, e.g., MontgomeRy’s Auditing § 28.29 (12th ed. 1998) (“Adverse opinions are rare. . . .

BARNETT, v. CITY OF CHICAGO, BONILLA v. CITY OF CHICAGO,, 969 F. Supp. 1359 (N.D. Ill. 1997)

. . . while the 10th Ward, which had a white plurality of 42.31% (and an African-American total population of 28.29% . . .

In R. COLEMAN, a k a C. a k a GRANT, v. A. LOUIS B., 192 B.R. 268 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1995)

. . . . §§ 55.10 and 28.29. Therefore, this case provided little guidance for the issue at hand. . . . Florida Statute § 28.29 provides in pertinent part: "Orders of dismissal and final judgments of the courts . . .

O. SNODDY, v. NCNB NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA, a, 575 So. 2d 231 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . . §§ 28.29 and 55.10, Fla.Stat. (1989). Recording the nonrecordable order was a nullity. . . .

CHARTER FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, WEST POINT, GEORGIA, v. OFFICE OF THRIFT SUPERVISION, W. Jr. W. III, B. H. L. C. B. E. H. W. T. M., 912 F.2d 1569 (11th Cir. 1990)

. . . Johnson — 28.29% each; Floyd H. Mann, R. Terry Taunton, Terrell E. Bishop, Jane W. . . .

BROWN, By v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF TOPEKA, SHAWNEE COUNTY, KANSAS,, 892 F.2d 851 (10th Cir. 1989)

. . . 69 School Minority White Total % Minority Highland Park 220 1,202 1,422 15.47 Topeka 584 1,480 2,064 28.29 . . .

W. SHARPE, v. T. CALABRESE,, 528 So. 2d 947 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . See §§ 28.222(2), 28.29, 55.10 and 695.01(1), Fla. Stat. . . .

A. HELMICK, v. M. HELMICK,, 436 So. 2d 1122 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . See §§ 88.341 and 28.222(3)(c); 28.29; 55.07; 55.-10; 55.101, Fla.Stat. (1981); yet the statutes consider . . .

DIBBLE, v. DIBBLE,, 377 So. 2d 1001 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

. . . The fact that a final judgment in a civil case must be recorded under the terms of Sec. 28.29, Fla.Stat . . .

M. v., 68 T.C. 895 (T.C. 1977)

. . . Federal income tax: Additions to the tax Deficiency Sec. 6651(a) Sec. 6653(a) Sec. 6654 $884 $221 $44.20 $28.29 . . .

M. RUBENSTEIN v. RICHARD FIDLIN CORPORATION, 346 So. 2d 89 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

. . . See: Section 28.29, Florida Statutes (1975); Wade v. State, 339 So.2d 648 (Fla.1976). . . .

MEADOWS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, v. IHLE,, 345 So. 2d 769 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

. . . And Section 28.29 was amended effective April 25, 1972, to provide: “The certified copy of a judgment . . . While Section 28.29, Florida Statutes (1969), directed recordation of final judgments in the court minutes . . . Venus Condominium Ass’n, Inc., affects present day recording practices under Sections 28.29 and 55.10 . . . Section 28.29(1): “No written order, judgment or decree, except an order of dismissal, a final judgment . . . Section 28.29(2): “Orders, judgments and decrees not recorded pursuant to the provisions of this section . . .

P. SMITH v. VENUS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., 343 So. 2d 1284 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

. . . This is further borne out by the amendment of Section 28.29 by Chapter 72-320, Laws of Florida, effective . . .

WADE, v. STATE, 339 So. 2d 648 (Fla. 1976)

. . . In addition, § 28.29, Fla.Stat. (1975), which describes the duties of the clerk of the circuit court, . . .

KEYSTONE WATER COMPANY, INC. v. H. BEVIS, 313 So. 2d 724 (Fla. 1975)

. . . overall rate of return on the new rate base, as requested by petitioner, would provide an excessive 28.29% . . .

STATE v. ARMSTRONG STATE v. R. BOYKEN, STATE v. A. HERNANDEZ STATE v. HUDSON,, 312 So. 2d 508 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

. . . order of the circuit court requiring the orders to be recorded; thus, recording is not required by § 28.29 . . . Rule 3.670, CrPR; see also Rules 3.830 and 3.840, CrPR, In addition, § 28.29, Fla.Stat., in delineating . . .

BECKER, C. T. A. G. v. D. KING,, 307 So. 2d 855 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

. . . Section 28.29, F.S. . Section 28.13, F.S. . Section 28.212, F.S. . See R.Cr.P. . . .

C. KINSEY, v. C. KELLY, 295 So. 2d 670 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974)

. . . that the order denying the motion for new trial was not required to be recorded by Florida Statute § 28.29 . . . Florida Statute § 28.29, F.S.A., provides that orders of dismissal and final judgments in civil actions . . . Florida Statute § 28.29, F.S.A., requires that final judgments in civil actions be recorded. . . .

LARYBAR, INC. v. CITY OF MIAMI BEACH M. R. L. CORPORATION, v. CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, 208 So. 2d 129 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1968)

. . . . § 28.29(1) (1965), F.S.A. On March 14, 1967, Larybar and M. R. . . . Since orders of dismissal must be recorded under Fla.Stat. § 28.29 (1) (1965), F.S.A., the computation . . .

SMITH, v. SMITH,, 194 So. 2d 917 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1967)

. . . Section 28.29(1), Fla.Stat., F.S.A., provides : “No written order, judgment or decree, except an order . . . Section 62.16, Fla.Stat., F.S.A., and § 28.21(5), Fla.Stat., F.S.A., enacted prior to § 28.29(1), supra . . . , are, in part, in conflict with § 28.29(1) insofar as they provide for the recording in the chancery . . .

LEEWARD HART AERONAUTICAL CORPORATION, v. SOUTH CENTRAL AIRLINES, INC., 184 So. 2d 454 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1966)

. . . has not been completed, and (2) since the order appealed has not been recorded according to Section 28.29 . . .

STATE BENACH v. HEFFERNAN,, 71 So. 2d 745 (Fla. 1954)

. . . docket relievés it from the effect of the sixty day limitation, but this contention overlooks Section 28.29 . . .