CopyCited 149 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 10380, 2010 WL 2011038
Code; 2 Wayne R. LaFave, Substantive Criminal Law § 16.2(d) (2d ed.2003); and various state statutes and
CopyCited 64 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 4420
or abets the commission of the crime. O.C.G.A. § 16-2-20. 5 . See discussion
CopyCited 43 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14400
...The Attorney General may be required to report to the Governor concerning the performance of his official duties. Const., Art. IV, Sec. 1(a); he is third in the order of gubernatorial succession, Fla.Stat. §
14.055, F.S.A.; in the event of his disability the Governor may appoint a person to perform his duties, Fla.Stat. §
16.02, F.S.A....
CopyCited 36 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
making him guilty as a principal under O.C.G.A. § 16-2-20. 7 The judge gave the appropriate
CopyCited 33 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida
[1] U.S.Const. Amend. VI; Fla. Const., art. I, § 16. [2]
64 Fla. 437,
60 So. 118 (1912). [3] The continuing
CopyCited 26 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
COMPETITION § 16:1 (2d ed. 1984). . Id. . Id. at § 16:2. . Id. . American Television, 810 F.2d at 1548
CopyCited 24 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
of this discussion. 8 . O.C.G.A. § 16-2-20 provides, in relevant part: (a) Every
CopyCited 20 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida
untagged vicious dogs" and that Article III, Section 16[2] of the Constitution of Florida, F.S.A. required
CopyCited 19 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14165, 1995 WL 574855
...rst user of the trademark and trade dress in the United States. "The cases are legion to the effect that for inherently distinctive marks, ownership is governed by priority of use." 2 J. Thomas McCarthy, McCarthy on Trademarks and Unfair Competition § 16.02(1)(a) at 16-4 & n....
...307 (2d Cir.), cert. denied,
254 U.S. 639,
41 S.Ct. 13,
65 L.Ed. 451 (1920). Who actually distributes the product to the end user is irrelevant; what is relevant is who was the actor that placed the product with the mark into commerce. McCarthy, supra, §
16.02(1)(b) at 16-6....
CopyCited 15 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2017 WL 1488236, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 7389
(1) crimes of violence, as defined in 18 U.S.C. § 16; (2) “offensefs] against property,” including those
CopyCited 14 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2002 WL 662682
contract to which Florida law did not apply. Section 16.2 of the contract provided for attorney's fees
CopyCited 14 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 80 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2286, 16 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 972, 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14070
breach of contract. The defendant contends that Section #16(2)[2] of the written contract provides the procedure
CopyCited 9 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal
trial adverse witnesses... ." Fla. Const., Art. I, § 16. [2] This approach is in agreement with the Federal
CopyCited 8 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 180 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2710, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 24306, 2006 WL 2742005
argument, which Mohawk makes here, that O.C.G.A. § 16-2-22, which places limits on corporate criminal liability
CopyCited 7 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1992 WL 41471
(1946). [15] Id. at § 599, and §
812.13(1), Fla. Stat. [16] 2 Burdick at § 599a. If the force or violence
CopyCited 6 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 177 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2550, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 10710, 2005 WL 1355512
liable under RICO, Georgia courts look to O.C.G.A. § 16-2-22. See Cobb County, 460 S.E.2d at 521
CopyCited 6 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2496, 2003 WL 403071
...nless those claims were interrelated or connected with the compensable claims ...." 1 Robert L. Rossi, Attorneys' Fees § 10:4 (3d ed.2001) (summarizing pertinent cases); see also 2 Mary Francis Derfner & Arthur D. Wolfe, Court Awarded Attorney Fees § 16.02 (1998) (summarizing pertinent cases)....
CopyCited 5 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6113, 1991 WL 115136
policy (limits and coverage to be as specified in Section 16.2) to be provided by Contractor in the name of
CopyCited 5 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2000 A.M.C. 2345, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 16683, 2000 WL 977396
Thomas J. Schoenbaum, Admiralty and Maritime Law § 16-2 (2d ed.1994). Raising sunken craft and property
CopyCited 5 times | Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | 22 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 77, 2009 Bankr. LEXIS 2374, 2009 WL 2710266
Contract does address the issue of clean-up costs. Section 16.2 of the Trade Contract requires HCC to provide
CopyCited 4 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 1997 WL 90851
litigation." Padovano, Florida Appellate Practice § 16.2 (1988). Appellate costs under rule 9.400(a) are
CopyCited 3 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1999 WL 462102
Const.Amends. VI and XIV; Fla. Const. Art. I, § 16. [2] Mr. Seymour's trial counsel also filed a motion
CopyCited 2 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2002 WL 1072074
[1] U.S. Const. amend. VI; Fla. Const., art. I, § 16. [2] Orders rendered in these earlier proceedings
CopyCited 2 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Thomas J. Schoenbaum, Admiralty and Maritime Law § 16-2 (2d ed. 1994). Raising sunken craft and property
CopyCited 2 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
(emphasis added). Although section 16 2 plaintiffs bear the burden
CopyCited 1 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
argument, which Mohawk makes here, that O.C.G.A. § 16-2-22, which places
CopyCited 1 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 1932 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1020
R. Co. et al., 159 I. C. C. 287. See 49 USCA § 16 (2). The only issue in the case is as to which of
CopyPublished | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
the evidence presented at 8 O.C.G.A. § 16-2-20 provides, in relevant part: (a)
CopyPublished | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Argued: Apr 20, 2023
ex- pected to be injured thereby.” Id. § 16-2-1(b). Based on the relevant information
CopyPublished | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Argued: Apr 20, 2023
ex- pected to be injured thereby.” Id. § 16-2-1(b). Based on the relevant information
CopyPublished | Supreme Court of Florida | 39 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 697, 2014 Fla. LEXIS 3322, 2014 WL 5856370
bylaws (including those currently in effect) — section 16(2); (ii) require the Foundation to amend its articles
CopyPublished | District Court of Appeal of Florida
see also Fla. Const., art. I, § 16. 2 Although a criminal defendant
CopyPublished | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
30 2 Wayne R. LaFave, Substantive Criminal Law § 16.2(d) (2d ed. 2003); and various state statutes and
CopyPublished | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal
7 See City of Miami, Ordinance No. 14376, § 16‑2 (Miami City Comm’n June 26, 2025). 8 Despite
CopyPublished | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal
Philip J. Padovano, Florida Appellate Practice § 16.2 (1988)). Stringer has been cited multiple times
CopyPublished | United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | 13 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 243, 2000 Bankr. LEXIS 730
as valid a forum selection clause, found in Section 16.2(b) of the agreement, stating that the parties
CopyPublished | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1702, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4090, 1989 WL 78318
conferred by those same rules and regulations in section 16.2.3 Summarizing, Meynarez enjoyed a protected
CopyPublished | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
J. McCarthy, TRADEMARKS AND UNFAIR COMPETITION § 16:2 (2d. ed. 1984). . Id. . American Television
CopyPublished | District Court, M.D. Florida | 17 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1324, 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14432
Supp. 649 (D.Mont.1966) ; 1 Collier, Bankruptcy, §
16.02 at 1525 (14th ed. 1964). The bankruptcy court is
CopyPublished | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
child in the second degree. See S.C. Code Ann. § 16-2-655(B)(1). The case proceeded to trial and resulted
CopyPublished | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 50 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1350, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 18343
not violate the Georgia RICO statute. O.C.G.A. § 16-2-22(a)(2); Cobb County v. Jones Group,
CopyPublished | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
not violate the Georgia RICO statute. O.C.G.A. § 16-2-22(a)(2); Cobb County v. Jones Group, 460 S.E.2d
CopyPublished | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Georgia has a “party to a crime” statute, O.C.G.A. § 16-2- 20, and he was convicted under that statute as
CopyPublished | District Court of Appeal of Florida