The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title III
LEGISLATIVE BRANCH; COMMISSIONS

Chapter 11
LEGISLATIVE ORGANIZATION, PROCEDURES, AND STAFFING

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 11.03

11.03 Proof of publication of notice.—

(1) Affidavit of proof of publication of such notice of intention to apply therefor, may be made, in substantially the following general form, but such form shall not be exclusive:

STATE OF FLORIDA

COUNTY OF

Before the undersigned authority personally appeared , who on oath does solemnly swear (or affirm) that she or he has knowledge of the matters stated herein; that a notice stating the substance of a contemplated law or proposed bill relating to

(here identify bill)

has been published at least 30 days prior to this date, by being printed in the issues of (here state day, month and year of issue or issues) of the , a newspaper or newspapers published in County or Counties, Florida (or) there being no newspaper, by being posted for at least 30 days prior to this date at three public places in County or Counties, one of which places was at the courthouse of said county or counties, where the matter or thing to be affected by the contemplated law is situated; that a copy of the notice that has been published as aforesaid and also this affidavit of proof of publication are attached to the proposed bill or contemplated law, and such copy of the notice so attached is by reference made a part of this affidavit.

Sworn to (or affirmed) and subscribed before me this day of , (year) , by (name of person making statement) .

(Signature of Notary Public - State of Florida)

(Print, Type, or Stamp Commissioned Name of Notary Public)

Personally Known OR Produced Identification

Type of Identification Produced

(2) Such affidavit of proof of publication shall be attached to the contemplated law when it is introduced into the Legislature. A true copy of the notice published or posted shall also be attached to the bill when introduced, but it shall not be necessary to enter said published or posted notice, or proof thereof, in the journals. The fact that such notice was established in the Legislature shall in every case be recited upon the journals of the Senate and of the House of Representatives, and the notice published and affidavit of publication thereof shall accompany the bill throughout the Legislature and be preserved as a part thereof in the Department of State.

History.—s. 2, ch. 3708, 1887; RS 67; GS 68; RGS 79; CGL 95; s. 1, ch. 13791, 1929; s. 1, ch. 21635, 1943; ss. 10, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 6, ch. 95-147; s. 11, ch. 98-246.

F.S. 11.03 on Google Scholar

F.S. 11.03 on Casetext

Amendments to 11.03

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 11.03

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 11.03.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

MIRKIN, v. XOOM ENERGY, LLC XOOM LLC,, 931 F.3d 173 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . are as follows: Period XOOM Rate Market Supply Cost Difference in % 5/10/2013-6/11/2013 9.39 (teaser) 11.03 . . .

PEERLESS INSURANCE COMPANY, v. TECHNOLOGY INSURANCE COMPANY, INC., 392 F. Supp. 3d 313 (E.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . Indeed, Section 11.03 of the Lease expressly allows Amelia to fulfill Vintage's maintenance obligations . . . Separately, Section 11.03, a section defendant apparently overlooked, refers to Vintage's maintenance . . .

PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WISCONSIN, INC. Dr. v. KAUL, B. W. Jo A. A. A. R. M. L. J. K. S. A., 384 F. Supp. 3d 982 (W.D. Wis. 2019)

. . . Code MED § 11.03, which prohibit anyone other than a physician from performing a medication or surgical . . . physicians duly licensed by the medial examining board," now codified in Wisconsin Administrative Code § MED 11.03 . . . Code MED § 11.03. See No. 250, Wis. Admin. Reg. 23 (Oct. 1976). . . .

In MATTER OF TRUSTS ESTABLISHED UNDER THE POOLING AND SERVICING AGREEMENTS RELATING TO THE WACHOVIA BANK COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE TRUST COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE PASS- THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES CMBS ML- CFC ML- CFC, 375 F. Supp. 3d 441 (S.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . (PSA § 11.03). . . . (PSA § 11.03). . . . (PSA § 11.03). . . . (PSA § 11.03). . . . (PSA § 11.03). . . .

WILLIAMS, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,, 366 F. Supp. 3d 411 (W.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . The ALJ particularly considered the criteria of Listings 2.07, 11.03, and 1.02B in reaching his conclusion . . .

CATTANO, v. A. BERRYHILL,, 686 F. App'x 408 (9th Cir. 2017)

. . . Cattano also did not meet all the requirements for Listing 11.03, for nonconvulsive epilepsy, because . . . Part 404, Subpart P, App. 1, § 11.03. 2. . . .

A. COOPER, v. A. BERRYHILL,, 244 F. Supp. 3d 824 (S.D. Ind. 2017)

. . . Cooper’s headaches and migraines met or equaled one of the qualifying impairments, Listing 11.03, which . . . However, they can be analogized to the provisions for petit mal, or non-convulsive, seizures in § 11.03 . . . A claimant may therefore demonstrate equivalence to Listing 11.03 by showing that his migraines cause . . . Cooper’s migraines under Listing 11.03 as part of her sequential analysis. Docket No. 20 at 6. . . . The 11.03 listings described in this order pertain to the criteria in effect at the time of the ALJ’s . . .

OMEGAGENESIS CORPORATION, v. MAYO FOUNDATION FOR MEDICAL EDUCATION AND RESEARCH,, 851 F.3d 800 (8th Cir. 2017)

. . . Section 11.03 provided that the “terms and conditions of this Agreement, as well as all disputes arising . . .

JFJ TOYS, INC. v. SEARS HOLDINGS CORPORATION,, 237 F. Supp. 3d 311 (D. Md. 2017)

. . . Thomas McCarthy, McCarthy on Trademarks and Unfair Competition §§ 11.03, 11.04 (4th ed. 2014) [hereinafter . . .

U. S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, v. T. D. BANK, N. A., 569 B.R. 12 (S.D.N.Y. 2017)

. . . commencement of any such [insolvency] proceeding),’” Id. at 335 n.3 (citing ABA, Model Simplified Indenture § 11.03 . . .

FARLEY, v. COLVIN,, 231 F. Supp. 3d 335 (N.D. Cal. 2017)

. . . P, App. 1 § 11.03 (effective Apr. 29, 2013). . . . According to the Commissioner, Farley’s attorney never raised the possibility of an 11.03 listing at . . . only at 11.03. . . . The 11.03 listing was thus not only raised with the ALJ, but considered and rejected by the ALJ. . . . At the time of the ALJ’s decision, noncon-vulsive epilepsy was listed at 11.03. . . .

EMJ CORPORATION v. HUDSON SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY,, 833 F.3d 544 (5th Cir. 2016)

. . . See also 1 Ostrager & Newman, supra note 1 § 11.03; 4 Douglas R. . . .

UNITED AIRLINES, INC. v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION BP LLC,, 827 F.3d 122 (D.C. Cir. 2016)

. . . From the March 2010 data, the nominal return on equity-was 11.03 percent, inflation was 2.31 percent, . . .

UNITED STATES v. ALL ASSETS HELD AT BANK JULIUS BAER COMPANY, LTD. In In, 315 F.R.D. 103 (D.D.C. 2016)

. . . Proc. 2016-1 § 11.03, 2016 WL 20933. . . .

J. THREATT, v. A. McDONALD,, 28 Vet. App. 56 (Vet. App. 2016)

. . . Ill, paras. 11.03 (“The Administrative activity identifies mail received from the White House, Members . . .

PHOENIX LIGHT SF LTD. v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST CO., 172 F. Supp. 3d 700 (S.D.N.Y. 2016)

. . . E.g., Biron Decl., Ex. 52 § 11.03; Ex. 41 § 10.08. . . .

BECKER v. BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N. A. J. P., 172 F. Supp. 3d 777 (E.D. Pa. 2016)

. . . Indenture § 11.03. . . . Id. § 11.03. This provision may not be “disre^ garded or treated as a nullity.” . . .

RANSOME, v. W. COLVIN,, 164 F. Supp. 3d 427 (W.D.N.Y. 2016)

. . . to Listing 11.18, which in turn states that cerebral trauma is to be evaluated under Listings 11.02, 11.03 . . .

AKUNA MATATA INVESTMENTS, LIMITED, v. TEXAS NOM LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, L. C. L. C., 814 F.3d 277 (5th Cir. 2016)

. . . Art. 6132b-11.03. . . . .

DILWORTH o b o A. v. W. COLVIN,, 158 F. Supp. 3d 238 (D. Del. 2016)

. . . (Tr. 17-18) Claimant’s seizures did not meet the criteria of either listing 11.02 or listing 11.03, because . . .

JOHNSON, v. COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,, 618 F. App'x 544 (11th Cir. 2015)

. . . The ALJ found that Johnson’s seizure disorder met the criteria of section 11.03 of the Listing of Impairments . . . P, App. 1, §§ 11.00, 11.03. . . . Johnson was deemed disabled because he suffered from epilepsy that met the criteria of Listing 11.03, . . . P, App. 1, § 11.03. . . . Because Johnson’s condition has improved to the point where he does not meet or equal Listing 11.03, . . .

J. SCHOLTISEK, v. W. COLVIN,, 110 F. Supp. 3d 464 (W.D.N.Y. 2015)

. . . Specifically, the ALJ considered Listings 1.04, 11.02, and 11.03. (Id.). 4. . . .

AMERICAN HOTEL LODGING ASSOCIATION v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES,, 119 F. Supp. 3d 1177 (C.D. Cal. 2015)

. . . As of 2013, the AHZE Ordinance living wage was $11.03 per hour if the employer provided fringe benefits . . .

FIGVED, v. W. COLVIN,, 103 F. Supp. 3d 954 (N.D. Ill. 2015)

. . . meet listings 1.04 covering disorders of the spine, 3.20 covering pulmonary insufficiency, or 11.02 or 11.03 . . .

BELLEW, v. ACTING COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,, 605 F. App'x 917 (11th Cir. 2015)

. . . P, App. 1, §§ 11.02-11.03. . . . Id. § 11.03. . . . With regard-to Listing 11.03, similarly there was no detailed documentation in Mr. . . . P, App. 1, § 11.03. As noted above, Dr. Schiff determined that Mr. . . . P, App. 1, §§ 11.00(A), 11.02, 11.03. On numerous occasions, testing revealed that Mr. . . .

L. MANN, v. W. COLVIN,, 100 F. Supp. 3d 710 (N.D. Iowa 2015)

. . . Part 404, Subpart P, Appendix I, § 11.03. . . . Therefore, 11.03 is the most closely analogous listed impairment. . . . Therefore, the claimant’s impairment medically equals listing 11.03. POMS DI 24505.015(B)(7)(b). . . . Dec. 18, 2014) (remanding with directions to address Listing 11.03); Savage v. . . . July 1, 2011) (directing ALJ to consider Listing 11.03 on remand); Gettner v. Barnhart, No. . . .

SILVERS, v. W. COLVIN,, 67 F. Supp. 3d 570 (W.D.N.Y. 2014)

. . . plaintiffs seizure disorder did not meet or equal the criteria of Listings 11.02 (Epilepsy-convulsive) or 11.03 . . .

M. HAIRSTON, o b o S. N. v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,, 52 F. Supp. 3d 657 (S.D.N.Y. 2014)

. . . Nov. 14, 2013) (comparing migraines to non-eonvulsive seizures under Listing 11.03). . . .

THOMAS, v. W. COLVIN,, 69 F. Supp. 3d 1174 (D. Colo. 2014)

. . . separate listing for migraines, the Commissioner has stated that the most analogous listing is section 11.03 . . . P, App. 1, § 11.03. . . . addressed plaintiffs migraines or assessed whether his complaints were medically equivalent to section 11.03 . . . evidence supports a conclusion that plaintiffs migraine headaches are medically equivalent to section 11.03 . . . Berkowitz had endorsed a finding of medical equivalence under section 11.03, the court would question . . .

SAVAGE, v. W. COLVIN,, 41 F. Supp. 3d 763 (S.D. Iowa 2014)

. . . Plaintiff argues that the migraine headaches are medically equivalent to the listing of impairments 11.03 . . .

UNITED STATES v. MANJARREZ,, 584 F. App'x 437 (9th Cir. 2014)

. . . appeals the 46-month sentence imposed by the district court following his guilty plea to importing 11.03 . . .

I. SHER, TMST, v. BARCLAYS CAPITAL, INC., 35 F. Supp. 3d 725 (D. Md. 2014)

. . . Using that vega, Packles opines that the Derivative Unwind Charge should have been $11.03 million, which . . .

SHARMA, v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY,, 58 F. Supp. 3d 59 (D.D.C. 2014)

. . . . § 11.03. . . . Ex. 3A § 11.03. . . . Ex. 3A § 11.03. Accepting plaintiffs claims would require imbuing the Retirement. . . . Ex. 3A § 11.03. . . .

CASARES, v. AGRI- PLACEMENTS INTERNATIONAL, INC., 12 F. Supp. 3d 956 (S.D. Tex. 2014)

. . . their first paychecks on October 22, 2009, YCCG paid them only $7.35 for the first 40 hours worked and $11.03 . . .

GE XIONG, v. W. COLVIN,, 995 F. Supp. 2d 958 (D. Minn. 2014)

. . . led him to become unconscious, (PL’s Mem., p. 5), the Court briefly addresses this Listings 11.02or 11.03 . . . Listings 11.02 and 11.03 require all of the following medical findings in order for a claimant to be . . .

LIPPINCOTT, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,, 982 F. Supp. 2d 358 (D.N.J. 2013)

. . . criteria for neurological disorders, including convulsive epilepsy (11.02), nonconvulsive epilepsy (11.03 . . .

CHURCHILL DOWNS INCORPORATED v. TROUT, P. F. F. T. III,, 979 F. Supp. 2d 746 (W.D. Tex. 2013)

. . . . §§ 11.03-11.04 and 11.06. Most importantly, the Act is linked to the Texas Penal Code. . . .

IN RE K- V DISCOVERY SOLUTIONS, INC. LLC, LLC, K- V v. K- V K- V, 496 B.R. 330 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2013)

. . . Id. quoting § 11.03 of the 1983 Model Indenture (other citation omitted) (emphasis in original). . . . .

In AFFINITY HEALTH CARE, MANAGEMENT, INC. LLC. LLC. v. M. D. a k a, 499 B.R. 246 (Bankr. D. Conn. 2013)

. . . (hereinafter, the “Plan”) the Committee has been authorized, pursuant to sections 11.01, 11.02 and 11.03 . . .

THIEMAN, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,, 989 F. Supp. 2d 624 (S.D. Ohio 2013)

. . . On appeal, Plaintiff challenges the ALJ’s finding that she does not meet Listing § 11.03, and the weight . . . argument — that the ALJ erred at Step Three by determining that she did not meet or equal Listing § 11.03 . . . Listing § 11.03 provides as follows: 11.03 Epilepsy — non convulsive epilepsy (petit mal, psychomotor . . . P, App.1, § 11.03. . . . she passes out “maybe once or twice” per month, PagelD 98-99, 114-15— she does not satisfy Listing § 11.03 . . .

v., 140 T.C. 410 (T.C. 2013)

. . . Proc. 96-53, sec. 11.03(2), 1996-2 C.B. at 384. . . . Proc. 96-53, sec. 11.03(3). . . .

UNITED STATES v. FREEMAN,, 718 F.3d 1002 (8th Cir. 2013)

. . . of methamphetamine (actual): 4.1 grams from the January 5 sale, 5.5 grams from the January 19 sale, 11.03 . . . drugs was not derived from drug proceeds, and (3) the amount of cash converted was not equivalent to 11.03 . . . paragraph 17 of the PSR, specifically the conversion of $1,344 seized during his January 19 arrest into 11.03 . . .

CUTHRELL, v. J. ASTRUE,, 702 F.3d 1114 (8th Cir. 2013)

. . . The listing for cerebral trauma has one line: “Evaluate under the provisions of 11.02, 11.03,' 11.04, . . .

In LOWER BUCKS HOSPITAL, NA v., 488 B.R. 303 (E.D. Pa. 2013)

. . . Section 11.03 of the Trust Indenture limits the liability of the Indenture Trustee to the Bondholders . . . Trust Indenture, § 11.03 at 62. . . . Trust Indenture, § 11.03 at 62 (R. 131). . . . .

BRODIE, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,, 492 F. App'x 817 (9th Cir. 2012)

. . . not err in determining that Brodie’s syncope and seizures did not equal listed impairments 11.02 or 11.03 . . .

In LOWER BUCKS HOSPITAL,, 471 B.R. 419 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 2012)

. . . . § 11.03). C. . . . Section 11.03 of the Indenture provided that the Indenture Trustee “shall not be answerable for the exercise . . . (Indenture § 11.03) (emphasis added). . . .

KOCUREK, J. v. CUNA MUTUAL INSURANCE SOCIETY,, 459 F. App'x 371 (5th Cir. 2012)

. . . That provision reads— 11.03 Other Insurance With Us and Duplicate Coverage: You may not be the insured . . .

CIH INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS, LLC, v. BT UNITED STATES, LLC,, 821 F. Supp. 2d 604 (S.D.N.Y. 2011)

. . . . § 11.03(b)); and (7) afford CIH "the right to participate” in any such tax contest, {Id. 11.03(c)). . . .

KLIBER, v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,, 794 F. Supp. 2d 1025 (D. Minn. 2011)

. . . Section 11.00 of Appendix 1 provides further information about evaluation of Listings 11.02 and 11.03 . . . When seizures are occurring at the frequency stated in 11.02 or 11.03, evaluation of the severity of . . . Whether Plaintiff Met or Equaled Listing 11.03 Listing 11.03 is met or equaled under the following conditions . . . : 11.03 Epilepsy-nonconvulsive epilepsy (petit mal,[] psychomotor, or focal), documented by detailed . . . Therefore, the record does not support a finding that Plaintiff met or equaled Listing 11.03. D. . . .

In BANK OF NEW ENGLAND CORPORATION, HSBC USA, JP f k a v. U. S. Dr. S., 646 F.3d 90 (1st Cir. 2011)

. . . Id. at 35 (emphasis in original) (quoting Model Simplified Indenture § 11.03 (1983)). . . . (emphasis added) (quoting Model Simplified Indenture § 11.03 cmt. 3). Mr. . . .

In BANK OF NEW ENGLAND CORPORATION, HSBC USA, JP f k a v. U. S. Dr. S., 646 F.3d 90 (1st Cir. 2011)

. . . Id. at 35 (emphasis in original) (quoting Model Simplified Indenture § 11.03 (1983)). . . . (emphasis added) (quoting Model Simplified Indenture § 11.03 cmt. 3). Mr. . . .

KNOWLTON, v. SHAW,, 791 F. Supp. 2d 220 (D. Me. 2011)

. . . Eye Care Assocs., 2006 ME 15, ¶ 19, 890 A.2d at 711; Maine Tort Law § 11.03. . . . Maine Tort Law § 11.02-11.03. . . .

In INNKEEPERS USA TRUST,, 448 B.R. 131 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2011)

. . . See Section 11.03(c) of the C-6 Servicing Agreement, which provides, in pertinent part, that "[n]o Certificateholder . . .

L. THOMPSON, v. J. ASTRUE,, 764 F. Supp. 2d 1132 (D. Minn. 2011)

. . . record; (2) the ALJ did not find that Plaintiffs impairments met Listings 11.02 (grand mal epilepsy) or 11.03 . . .

SURPRENANT, v. MASSACHUSETTS TURNPIKE AUTHORITY,, 768 F. Supp. 2d 312 (D. Mass. 2011)

. . . See 740 C.M.R. 11.03. . . .

L. BARTLETT v. MUTUAL PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY, INC., 760 F. Supp. 2d 220 (D.N.H. 2011)

. . . Vautour, 147 N.H. at 157, 784 A.2d 1178; see also 2 Frumer & Friedman, supra, § 11.03[4][d], at 11-101 . . .

UNITED STATES v. SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION,, 626 F.3d 1257 (D.C. Cir. 2010)

. . . Androphy, Federal False Claims Act & Qui Tam Litigation § 11.03[2] (2009). . . .

DELGADO- O NEIL, v. CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS,, 745 F. Supp. 2d 894 (D. Minn. 2010)

. . . investigation into this matter, Plaintiff was found to have violated Minneapolis Civil Service Commission Rule 11.03 . . .

AVEDISIAN, v. QUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITY,, 387 F. App'x 59 (2d Cir. 2010)

. . . July 1, 1998 Collective Bargaining Agreement § 11.03. . . . who is denied tenure other than pursuant to Section 10.04, shall be terminated pursuant to Section 11.03 . . . ,” July 1, 1998 Collective Bargaining Agreement § 10.05, Section 11.03 provides that a "non-tenured Faculty . . . may be terminated” at the end of a contract year in which she has been evaluated for tenure, id. § 11.03 . . .

FIFTH THIRD BANK, v. McCLURE PROPERTIES, INC., 724 F. Supp. 2d 598 (W.D. Va. 2010)

. . . entitled to all cost and expenses incurred in enforcement, including attorney fees, pursuant to section 11.03 . . . Costs and Attorneys Fees Section 11.03 of the May 2006 contract provides: Borrower agrees to pay upon . . .

WISCONSIN INTERSCHOLASTIC ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION v. GANNETT CO. INC., 716 F. Supp. 2d 773 (W.D. Wis. 2010)

. . . Code § Tax 11.03(2)(a)5. . . .

LEVITON MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC. v. UNIVERSAL SECURITY INSTRUMENTS, INC. USI v., 606 F.3d 1353 (Fed. Cir. 2010)

. . . . § 11.03. . . .

PEER, v. LEWIS,, 606 F.3d 1306 (11th Cir. 2010)

. . . Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practice § 11.03 (3d ed.2010) (citing Cooter & Gell v. . . .

In PERRY, S S v., 423 B.R. 215 (Bankr. S.D. Tex. 2010)

. . . Stat. art. 6132b § 11.03(a); Ingram, 288 S.W.3d at 894 n. 4. . . .

LATIN AMERICAN MUSIC COMPANY, d b a n y M ACEMLA n y M ACEMLA v. AMERICAN SOCIETY OF COMPOSERS AUTHORS AND PUBLISHERS,, 593 F.3d 95 (1st Cir. 2010)

. . . Nimmer & David Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright §§ 11.03[B], at 11-40.5 (2007) (“Grants executed on or after . . .

TRADEARBED INC USA v. WESTERN BULK CARRIERS K S,, 374 F. App'x 464 (5th Cir. 2010)

. . . Id; see also Saul Sorkin, Goods in TRANSIT § 11.03 n. 27 (2009) (“Uncertainty in ascertaining damages . . .

EVANSTON INSURANCE COMPANY, v. DILLARD DEPARTMENT STORES, INC. v. J. P. III,, 602 F.3d 610 (5th Cir. 2010)

. . . See TRPA § 11.03(c) (codified at Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat. Ann. art. 6132b-11.03(c)). . . .

L. BARTLETT v. MUTUAL PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY, INC., 759 F. Supp. 2d 171 (D.N.H. 2010)

. . . Vautour, 147 N.H. at 157, 784 A.2d 1178; see also 2 Frumer & Friedman, supra, § 11.03[4][d], at 11-101 . . .

KYLES, v. GARRETT, 353 F. App'x 942 (5th Cir. 2009)

. . . Law Serv.3d Called Sess. ch. 3, § 11.03 (codified at Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 508.031 (Vernon 2004)). . . .

WILLIAM A. GROSS CONSTRUCTION ASSOCIATES, INC. v. AMERICAN MANUFACTURERS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY,, 262 F.R.D. 354 (S.D.N.Y. 2009)

. . . Section 11.03 of the General Conditions provides: Any decision or determination of the Consultant, [DASNY . . . (General Conditions § 11.03.) . . .

GEORGIA OUTDOOR NETWORK, INC. J. N. v. MARION COUNTY, GEORGIA,, 652 F. Supp. 2d 1355 (M.D. Ga. 2009)

. . . This revised Ordinance, found in Article XI, Sections 11.03(0) and 11.09 of the Zoning Ordinance of Marion . . .

ZOLDAN, v. ZOHLMAN Co-, 11 So. 3d 982 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . specificity the nature of the interests created on the death of a limited partner: Death of Limited Partner 11.03 . . .

In HANNAFORD BROS. CO. CUSTOMER DATA SECURITY BREACH LITIGATION, 613 F. Supp. 2d 108 (D. Me. 2009)

. . . Simmons, et al., Maine Tort Law §§ 11.03, 11.04 (2004). . Brae Asset Fund, L.P. v. . . .

R. GUY, v. J. ASTRUE,, 615 F. Supp. 2d 143 (S.D.N.Y. 2009)

. . . Appendix 1 § 11.03. . . .

In BANK OF NEW ENGLAND CORP., 404 B.R. 17 (Bankr. D. Mass. 2009)

. . . Section 11.03. Liquidation; Dissolution; Bankruptcy. . . .

A. CRAIG, v. P. SMITH,, 597 F. Supp. 2d 814 (S.D. Ind. 2009)

. . . put option is exercisable is the fair market value of the Employer Stock as determined under Section 11.03 . . . Section 11.03 provides that the value of stock is the value: as of the most recent Valuation Date; unless . . . Plan § 11.03(b). The requirements of the put option are at the center of this case. II. . . .

PARKS, v. J. ASTRUE,, 304 F. App'x 503 (9th Cir. 2008)

. . . P, App. 1, §§ 11.02 and 11.03 (Listings 11.02 and 11.03). . . . indicate that while on anticonvulsants, she reported experiencing fewer seizures than Listings 11.02 and 11.03 . . .

JONES, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 297 F. App'x 117 (3d Cir. 2008)

. . . Daniel Nackley, who testified at the second administrative hearing that Jones met Listing 11.03 (Epilepsy . . . Nackley’s testimony because he never retracted his opinion that Jones met Listing 11.03. . . . Nackley responded “11.03, which is the listing for epilepsy.” Id. at 608. . . . Nackley’s conclusion that Jones met Listing 11.03 as unsupported by the record. Id. at 361. . . .

H. MARRAS, Sr. Co. LLC, v. CITY OF LIVONIA, 575 F. Supp. 2d 807 (E.D. Mich. 2008)

. . . except when such vehicle is part of the inventory of a ‘New and Used Car Lot’ as permitted by Section 11.03 . . . except when such vehicle is part of the inventory of a “New and Used Car Lot” as permitted by Section 11.03 . . .

SIEGEL v. WARNER BROS. ENTERTAINMENT INC. DC, 542 F. Supp. 2d 1098 (C.D. Cal. 2008)

. . . . § 304(c)(2); 3 Nimmer on Copyright § 11.03[A][2][a] at 11-40.1 (noting that when the 1976 Act was originally . . .

UNITED STATES v. IN U. S. CURRENCY F- F., 518 F.3d 1159 (9th Cir. 2008)

. . . See Smith, supra, § 11.03[6]. . . . See Smith, supra, § 11.03[6](argu-ing that if Congress meant to eliminate the probable cause requirement . . . But see Smith, supra, § 11.03[6] n. 56.4 (faulting First Circuit because it "appears to have accepted . . .

J. LAMANNA, v. SPECIAL AGENTS MUTUAL BENEFITS ASSOCIATION, d b a, 546 F. Supp. 2d 261 (W.D. Pa. 2008)

. . . (See SAMBA Restated Bylaws and Plan Instrument, as Restated January 30, 2007, ¶ 11.03, PLN 9.) . . .

P. ANTHONY, v. J. ASTRUE,, 266 F. App'x 451 (6th Cir. 2008)

. . . contends that the ALJ should have found that his seizure disorder qualifies under Listings 11.02 and 11.03 . . . ALJ’s determination that Anthony’s seizure disorder does not meet the criteria of Listings 11.02 and 11.03 . . .

BRODIE, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,, 267 F. App'x 662 (9th Cir. 2008)

. . . viewed in combination, could not be analyzed to determine whether they met or equaled Listings 11.02 or 11.03 . . .

COLLINS, v. Jo B. BARNHART,, 533 F. Supp. 2d 809 (N.D. Ill. 2008)

. . . The Steele court was discussing Listing 11.03, which covers petit mal seizures. . . .

SIESTA VILLAGE MARKET, LLC, d b a v. PERRY,, 530 F. Supp. 2d 848 (N.D. Tex. 2008)

. . . Bev.Code §§ 6.01, 6.03, 11.01, 11.03, 11.46(a)(ll), 11.61(b)(19), 22.01, 22.03, 24.01, 24.03, 41.01, . . .

SARA LEE CORPORATION, v. AMERICAN BAKERS ASSOCIATION RETIREMENT PLAN,, 512 F. Supp. 2d 39 (D.D.C. 2007)

. . . In support of its contention, Sara Lee points to ¶ 11.03 of the ABA Plan Trust, which provides that the . . .

UNITED STATES v. IN U. S. CURRENCY,, 527 F. Supp. 2d 1103 (C.D. Cal. 2007)

. . . Smith, Prosecution and Defense of Forfeiture Cases, ¶ 11.03[6]. . . . See Smith, supra, ¶ 11.03[6] (“Had Congress wished to enact DoJ’s proposal, it would have substituted . . .

L. WISNER, v. J. ASTRUE,, 496 F. Supp. 2d 1299 (N.D. Ala. 2007)

. . . the Listings (epilepsy-major motor seizures, including grand mal or psychomotor seizures), or under § 11.03 . . . was having five to six seizure episodes per month, which certainly meets the frequency criterion of § 11.03 . . .

SALTIRE INDUSTRIAL, INC. f k a a U. S. A. v. WALLER, LANSDEN, DORTCH DAVIS, PLLC,, 491 F.3d 522 (6th Cir. 2007)

. . . Lansden’s alleged misconduct in the state court — namely, it could have sought sanctions pursuant to Rule 11.03 . . .

AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION, v. R. GONZALES, 478 F. Supp. 2d 775 (E.D. Pa. 2007)

. . . those three products respectively were between 4.69 percent and 7.99 percent, between 5.25 percent and 11.03 . . .

PFIZER INC. G. D. Co. G. D. LLC, LLC LLC v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., 482 F. Supp. 2d 390 (D.N.J. 2007)

. . . See, e.g., 4 Chisum on Patents § 11.03. . . . See also 4 Chisum on Patents § 11.03: In Paperless Accounting ... the Federal Circuit ... held that the . . .

THE CHASE MANHATTAN BANK, v. IRIDIUM AFRICA CORPORATION,, 474 F. Supp. 2d 613 (D. Del. 2007)

. . . In support of its argument, Chase directs the Court to Section 11.03 of the LLC Agreement, which provides . . . A (“LLC Agreement”) at § 11.03(a)(iv)(B).) . . . However, Section 11.03 was not amended to give Chase any direct rights against Iridium’s Members, and . . . A at Section 11.03(a)(iv)). . . . that set-off rights apply to the remedy of attorneys’ fees provided in Section 11.03(a)(iv). . . .

In PERRY H. KOPLIK SONS, INC. S. H. v., 357 B.R. 231 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2006)

. . . See Koplik’s Plan of Reorganization, Article XI, § 11.03 ("Pursuant to section 1123(b)(3) of the Bankruptcy . . .

F. TUCKER, v. Jo B. BARNHART,, 201 F. App'x 617 (10th Cir. 2006)

. . . Tucker met the criteria of seizure-related Listing 11.03 and to further evaluate Ms. . . . Tucker’s impairments were severe enough to meet or equal Listings 11.02, 11.03, 12.02, or 12.04. . . . See 20 C.F.R., part 404, subpart P, app. 1, §§ 11.02, 11.03, 12.02, 12.04. . . . that the ALJ erred in determining that her seizures did not satisfy the criteria for Listings 11.02 or 11.03 . . .

In MOTORCYCLE EXCELLENCE GROUP, INC. v. BMW LLC,, 365 B.R. 370 (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. 2006)

. . . Section 11.03 of the Dealer Agreement provides that BMW has the right to terminate the Dealer Agreement . . . In addition, Section 11.03 of the Dealer Agreement permits termination in the event of “[i]mpairment . . . The termination provision of the Dealer Agreement is set forth at Section 11.03. . . . As noted above, on July 7, 2005, pursuant to Section 11.03 of the Dealer Agreement, BMW gave notice to . . .

CARICO INVESTMENTS, INC. v. TEXAS ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE COMMISSION,, 439 F. Supp. 2d 733 (S.D. Tex. 2006)

. . . . § 11.03 (Vernon 1995). . . .

BARON FINANCIAL CORPORATION v. NATANZON,, 471 F. Supp. 2d 535 (D. Md. 2006)

. . . plaintiff who was not a party to the contract ”)(emphasis added); Campanella, 1-11 Business Torts, § 11.03 . . .

BEYNUM, a k a v. Jo BARNHART,, 435 F. Supp. 2d 142 (D.D.C. 2006)

. . . plaintiffs seizure impairment to be equivalent to the disability listing under Section 11.02 and/or 11.03 . . . behavior of impaired intellectual functions; therefore, the claimant could not meet or equal Listing 11.03 . . .

STEINBECK, v. MCINTOSH OTIS, INC. a a H. USA v., 433 F. Supp. 2d 395 (S.D.N.Y. 2006)

. . . Music Sales Corp., 76 F.Supp.2d 375, 377 (S.D.N.Y.1999); see also 3-11 Nimmer on Copyright § 11.03[A] . . .