Florida/Georgia Personal Injury & Workers Compensation

You're probably overthinking it. Call a lawyer.

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 11.03 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 11.03 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 11.03 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 11.03

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title III
LEGISLATIVE BRANCH; COMMISSIONS
Chapter 11
LEGISLATIVE ORGANIZATION, PROCEDURES, AND STAFFING
View Entire Chapter
11.03 Proof of publication of notice.—
(1) Affidavit of proof of publication of such notice of intention to apply therefor, may be made, in substantially the following general form, but such form shall not be exclusive:

STATE OF FLORIDA

COUNTY OF  

Before the undersigned authority personally appeared  , who on oath does solemnly swear (or affirm) that she or he has knowledge of the matters stated herein; that a notice stating the substance of a contemplated law or proposed bill relating to

  (here identify bill)  

has been published at least 30 days prior to this date, by being printed in the issues of   (here state day, month and year of issue or issues)   of the  , a newspaper or newspapers published in   County or Counties, Florida (or) there being no newspaper, by being posted for at least 30 days prior to this date at three public places in   County or Counties, one of which places was at the courthouse of said county or counties, where the matter or thing to be affected by the contemplated law is situated; that a copy of the notice that has been published as aforesaid and also this affidavit of proof of publication are attached to the proposed bill or contemplated law, and such copy of the notice so attached is by reference made a part of this affidavit.

 

Sworn to (or affirmed) and subscribed before me this   day of   ,   (year)  , by   (name of person making statement)  .

  (Signature of Notary Public - State of Florida)  

  (Print, Type, or Stamp Commissioned Name of Notary Public)  

Personally Known    OR Produced Identification   

Type of Identification Produced 

(2) Such affidavit of proof of publication shall be attached to the contemplated law when it is introduced into the Legislature. A true copy of the notice published or posted shall also be attached to the bill when introduced, but it shall not be necessary to enter said published or posted notice, or proof thereof, in the journals. The fact that such notice was established in the Legislature shall in every case be recited upon the journals of the Senate and of the House of Representatives, and the notice published and affidavit of publication thereof shall accompany the bill throughout the Legislature and be preserved as a part thereof in the Department of State.
History.—s. 2, ch. 3708, 1887; RS 67; GS 68; RGS 79; CGL 95; s. 1, ch. 13791, 1929; s. 1, ch. 21635, 1943; ss. 10, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 6, ch. 95-147; s. 11, ch. 98-246.

F.S. 11.03 on Google Scholar

F.S. 11.03 on CourtListener

Amendments to 11.03


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 11.03

Total Results: 57  |  Sort by: Relevance  |  Newest First

Copy

Peer v. Lewis, 606 F.3d 1306 (11th Cir. 2010).

Cited 119 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 10296

...DISCUSSION A. Rule 11 “The purpose of Rule 11 is to deter baseless filings in district court and thus streamline the administration and procedure of federal courts.” 2 James Wm. Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practice § 11.03 (3d ed....
Copy

United States v. Jackie McLeod, 53 F.3d 322 (11th Cir. 1995).

Cited 88 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 12949, 1995 WL 275973

Jerold H. Israel, Criminal Procedure, § 11.3, at 546 n. 4 (2d Hornbook ed. 1992). 7
Copy

United States v. Robert Blackman, Marvin Hinsey, Kenny Thompson, Salathiel Calvin Thompson, 66 F.3d 1572 (11th Cir. 1995).

Cited 85 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 43 Fed. R. Serv. 211, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 29772, 1995 WL 584712

584, 116 L.Ed.2d 609 (1991); 4 LaFave, supra, § 11.3(a) at 282 (1994 Supp. at 68), they were not entitled
Copy

Palmer & Cay, Inc. v. Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc., 404 F.3d 1297 (11th Cir. 2005).

Cited 70 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 22 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1279, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 5243, 2005 WL 737048

not included on the list. Id. at 105, § 11.3(d). Additionally, the agreement contains a merger
Copy

Tillman v. State, 934 So. 2d 1263 (Fla. 2006).

Cited 56 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 2006 WL 1837903

home); but see 6 Wayne R. LaFave, Search and Seizure § 11.3(b), at 156 (4th ed.2004) (suggesting that "if the
Copy

Mahon v. United States Dep't of Agric., 485 F.3d 1247 (11th Cir. 2007).

Cited 42 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 11017, 2007 WL 1365976

benefits under, any program of an agency[.]” 7 C.F.R. § 11.3 (2002). C. With respect to John and Shelby Mahon
Copy

Bostick v. State, 554 So. 2d 1153 (Fla. 1989).

Cited 38 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1989 WL 145515

governmental intrusion." 3 W. LaFave, Search and Seizure § 11.3(e), at 571 (1978). See also J. Choper, Y. Kamisar
Copy

Am. Viking Contractors, Inc. v. Scribner Equip. Co., Inc., Scribner Equip. Co., Inc. v. Henry F. Nelson, 745 F.2d 1365 (11th Cir. 1984).

Cited 37 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 39 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1354, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 17043

an antecedent obligation of any kind.” O.C.G.A. § 11-3-408 (1982). This section is clearly applicable
Copy

United States v. Juan Delgado, Dagoberto Silva, Henry Escobar, 903 F.2d 1495 (11th Cir. 1990).

Cited 36 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 30 Fed. R. Serv. 1038, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 10078, 1990 WL 75081

the business.” 3 W. LaFave, Search and Seizure § 11.3, at 566 (1978). Indeed, it appears that, where
Copy

Cox v. State, 219 So. 2d 762 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1969).

Cited 21 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

...The state argued that this testimony was objectionable as hearsay because it was made outside the presence of the defendant. The defendant had a right to object to this statement as hearsay since it was made outside his presence, but he also had a right to waive any objections to hearsay testimony. See 30 Am.Jur.2d Evidence § 11.03 and 29 Am.Jur.2d Evidence § 494....
Copy

State Ex Rel. Watson v. City of Miami, 15 So. 2d 481 (Fla. 1943).

Cited 19 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 153 Fla. 653, 1943 Fla. LEXIS 726

office of the Secretary of State, as required by Section 11.03 Florida Statutes 1941. The Journal entry of
Copy

Great S. v. First S., 625 So. 2d 463 (Fla. 1993).

Cited 17 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 30 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1522, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 525, 1993 Fla. LEXIS 1630, 1993 WL 391614

...If, in the process of selecting a new mark, a seller sits down and invents a totally new and unique combination of letters or symbols that results in a mark that has no prior use in the language, then the result is a "coined" or "fanciful" mark. McCarthy, § 11.03[1] (footnote omitted). [8] KODAK, POLAROID and XEROX are examples of fanciful or coined marks. Id. § 11.03[4]....
Copy

Allison v. Vintage Sports Plaques, 136 F.3d 1443 (11th Cir. 1998).

Cited 17 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 46 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1138, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 5026, 1998 WL 119796

The Rights of Publicity and Privacy § 11.3 (1997). Because Allison resides in Alabama, treatment
Copy

Pro-Fab, Inc. v. Vipa, Inc., & Cmty. Bank, 772 F.2d 847 (11th Cir. 1985).

Cited 14 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 41 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1779, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 23448

which would make it a holder in due course (Code Section 11-3-302) and in an appropriate case would make it
Copy

Floyd v. E. Airlines, Inc., 872 F.2d 1462 (11th Cir. 1989).

Cited 14 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1989 WL 44826

alone. See Kreindler, 1 Aviation Accident Law § 11.03[2][b] at 11-42. Several cases have held that Article
Copy

State v. Beja, 451 So. 2d 882 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984).

Cited 13 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

(See generally LaFave, Search and Seizure, Vol. 3, § 11.3 (1978).) The Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments of
Copy

Sims v. New Falls Corp., 37 So. 3d 358 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010).

Cited 8 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 7302, 2010 WL 2077145

difference between Fla. Stat. § 673.1181 and Ga. Stat. § 11-3-118(a), does not seem to have such far reaching
Copy

Allison v. Vintage Sports Plaques, 136 F.3d 1443 (11th Cir. 1998).

Cited 8 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Thomas McCarthy, The Rights of Publicity and Privacy § 11.3 (1997). Because Allison resides in Alabama, treatment
Copy

Hicks v. State, 929 So. 2d 13 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006).

Cited 8 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2006 WL 197200

expectation of privacy. Wayne LaFave, Search & Seizure § 11.3(e), at 204 (4th ed. 2004) ("The officer's belief
Copy

State v. Scott, 481 So. 2d 40 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985).

Cited 6 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 11 Fla. L. Weekly 19

initial stop or arrest); LaFave, Search and Seizure § 11.3 (1978), and cases collected at 282-91 (Supp. 1985)
Copy

Haymons v. Williams, 795 F. Supp. 1511 (M.D. Fla. 1992).

Cited 6 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17735, 1992 WL 119985

deficiencies of Underhill were described as follows: Section 11.3, Medicaid Home Health Provider Handbook states
Copy

Nieminski v. State, 60 So. 3d 521 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011).

Cited 6 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 6058, 2011 WL 1599572

Search & Seizure: A Treatise on the Fourth Amendment § 11.3 (4th ed. 2004). In this case, however, the "standing”
Copy

Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Lambros, 1 F. Supp. 2d 1337 (M.D. Fla. 1998).

Cited 4 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16283, 1998 WL 154629

Defendant compels a modification of the award under § 11. [3] The Court notes that Plaintiffs have asserted
Copy

Coulter Elec., Inc. v. Com. Bank of Cobb Cnty., 727 F.2d 1078 (11th Cir. 1984).

Cited 4 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 38 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 239, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 24251

conversion of the checks under Official Ga.Code Ann. § 11-3-419(l)(c) (1982) (“An instrument is converted when
Copy

Dean v. State, 430 So. 2d 491 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

(5th Cir.1975); 3 W. LaFave, Search and Seizure § 11.3 at 565-66 (1978). Moreover, the defendant made
Copy

Ferox, LLC v. Conseal Int'l, Inc., 175 F. Supp. 3d 1363 (S.D. Fla. 2016).

Cited 3 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2016 WL 1242165

Agreement also contains an integration clause under Section 11.3, which reads: Entire Agreement; Amendment. This
Copy

Peachtree Cas. Ins. v. Prof. Massage Servs., 923 So. 2d 548 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2006 WL 536612

rendered before October 1, 2001. See Ch.2001-271, § 11(3), Laws of Fla.[3] If, on the other hand, the county
Copy

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. West Gables Open Mri Servs., Inc., 846 So. 2d 538 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 2616

2001. This October 1, 2001 date appears in section 11(3) of the Act and provides: "Paragraphs (4)(b)
Copy

Progressive Exp. Ins. Co., Inc. v. Menendez, 979 So. 2d 324 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2008 WL 723848

have a later effective date. See Ch. 2001-271, § 11(3), at 2948, Laws of Fla. (applying a later effective
Copy

Ameritrust Co., N. A. v. White, 73 F.3d 1553 (11th Cir. 1996).

Cited 2 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 75 A.L.R. 5th 725, 28 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 1277, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 1597, 1996 WL 21067

reaching its decision, the court relied on O.C.G.A. § 11-3-104(1), which reads: “Any writing to be a negotiable
Copy

Chavous v. Goodbred, 30 So. 2d 370 (Fla. 1947).

Cited 2 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 158 Fla. 826, 1947 Fla. LEXIS 644

sufficiency of the substance under another question. Section 11.03, Fla. Stat., 1941. F.S.A., imports no binding
Copy

Thomas v. State, 596 So. 2d 518 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1992 WL 63446

(1978); see also 4 LaFave, Search and Seizure, § 11.3(i) pgs. 359, 360 (1987). AFFIRMED. GOSHORN, C.J
Copy

Seritage SRC Fin., LLC v. the Town Ctr. at Boca Raton Trust (Fla. 4th DCA 2024).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

parcel, adjacent to the mall. The REA’s section 11.3 is the focus of the dispute before us. That
Copy

Christian S. Gherardi v. Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. (11th Cir. 2020).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Modification, not relevant here, is governed by 9 U.S.C. § 11. 3 Like several of our sister circuits, we previously
Copy

Emery v. Am. Airlines, Inc., 56 F. Supp. 3d 1284 (S.D. Fla. 2014).

Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 148656, 2014 WL 5341881

establishes the PBAC, appointed pursuant to Section 11.3 of the Plan, which has the power to “administer
Copy

City of Coral Gables v. Brigham, 321 So. 2d 615 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 15571

have § 11.07 [requiring building permits] and § 11.03 [requiring approval of a Board of Architects] of
Copy

Dillard v. Crenshaw Cnty., Alabama, 831 F.2d 246 (11th Cir. 1987).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

state law for county commissions. Code of Alabama § 11-3-20 (1975). Of course, for the Calhoun County structure
Copy

Travelers Prop. Cas. Co. of Am. v. Ocean Reef Charters LLC (11th Cir. 2021).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

circumstances in which it occurred.” See id. at § 11(3). If there are still “special reasons for keeping
Copy

Thacker v. State, 313 So. 2d 426 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 14817

basis for the plea at 8 J. Moore, Federal Practice § 11.03(4) (2d ed. 1975); Bruce v. United States, 1967
Copy

Dean v. United States, 330 F. Supp. 2d 1318 (N.D. Fla. 2004).

Published | District Court, N.D. Florida | 94 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5427, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11563, 2004 WL 1587865

under the control of a third party. Int. Rev. Man § 11.3.21.3(5). Special Agent Burgess's telephone calls
Copy

Hillsborough Holdings Corp. v. United States (In re Hillsborough Holdings Corp.), 179 B.R. 728 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1995).

Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | 8 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 396, 1995 Bankr. LEXIS 295, 75 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1547

particular year at issue. Rev.Proc. 92-1, 1992-1 IRB § 11.03 (Jan. 6 1992). However, such a ruling is not binding
Copy

State v. Suco, 502 So. 2d 446 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

expectation of privacy." 3 W. LaFave, Search and Seizure § 11.3(a), at 546 (1978). On the other hand, an opposite
Copy

Ken Lones Landscaping v. Tucker, 395 So. 2d 272 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19647

opinion. . Alpert, Florida Workmen's Compensation, § 11-3. . Id. at 1979 Supp. at 23-24.
Copy

Dunn v. Cox, 560 F. Supp. 2d 1247 (M.D. Fla. 2008).

Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 44 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2704, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44895, 2008 WL 2370247

Beneficiary is entitled to benefits." (2001 Plan § 11.3, Pl.'s Ex. 2 at 74; see also 2003 Plan § 13.1(d)
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1976).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

authority to promulgate general personnel rules. Section 11(3), Ch. 75- 48, Laws of Florida, grants a limited
Copy

Davis v. State, 582 So. 2d 61 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 5584, 1991 WL 103423

their guests.” *644 W. LaFave, Search & Seizure § 11.3, at 38 (Supp.1990) (footnote omitted). To conclude
Copy

State v. Barrowclough, 416 So. 2d 47 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20539

personal effects.” 3 W. LaFave, Search & Seizure § 11.3(f) (1978 & Supp.1980).
Copy

Weitz Co. v. MCW Acquisition, LLC, 116 So. 3d 623 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2013 WL 3336857, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 10602

rights under the "Other *625Contracts.” . Section 11.3 of the standard terms and conditions in the
Copy

Lopez v. State, 225 So. 3d 330 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 10657, 2017 WL 3161046

their fruit. 6 W. LaFave, Search and Seizure § 11.3(e), text accompanying notes 294-96 (5th ed. and
Copy

Est. of David Bass v. Regions Bank, Inc. (11th Cir. 2020).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

section of the Georgia UCC—namely, Georgia Code § 11-3-420.6 As we discuss below in Part V, this argument
Copy

Javier Alonso-llamazares, M.D. v. Int'l Dermatology Rsch., Inc., Etc. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

no reason.” (emphasis added). Additionally, section 11.3, entitled, “Effects of Termination” includes
Copy

State of Florida v. Jeffery D. Williams, 184 So. 3d 1205 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

Id. at 18 (citing 3 LaFave, Searches & Seizures § 11.3(f)); see also People v. Pereira, 150 Cal.App.4th
Copy

Robert Emerson v. Hillsborough Cnty., Florida, etc. & Stacy White v. Hillsborough Cnty., Florida, etc. (Fla. 2021).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida

effect for a period of thirty (30) years.” Id. § 11.03. Article 11 contains an elaborate scheme
Copy

MidAmerica C2L Inc. v. Siemens Energy, Inc. (11th Cir. 2022).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

20-11266 additional fee. Second, under § 11.3.1, the 2012 LSA allowed Sie- mens to terminate
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 2003).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

operating" airports and airport facilities. 8 Section 11(3), Ch. 71-924, Laws of Florida. 9 Section 11(4)(b)
Copy

State v. Fernandez, 501 So. 2d 648 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11547, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 136

the home dweller. 3 W. LaFave, Search and Seizure § 11.3(b), at 553 (1978); see Rakas v. Illinois, 439 U
Copy

Fort Lauderdale Food Not Bombs v. City of Fort Lauderdale (11th Cir. 2021).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Park Rules deals with enforcement. Specifically, § 11.3, entitled “Trespass,” says that “[a]ny person or

This Florida statute resource is curated by Graham W. Syfert, Esq., a Jacksonville, Florida personal injury and workers' compensation attorney. For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.