Florida/Georgia Personal Injury & Workers Compensation

You're probably overthinking it. Call a lawyer.

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 1.02 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 1.02 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 1.02 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 1.02

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title I
CONSTRUCTION OF STATUTES
Chapter 1
DEFINITIONS
View Entire Chapter
1.02 Legal time.In all laws, statutes, orders, rules and regulations of this state, relating to the time of performance of any act by any officer or department of this state, whether in the legislative, executive or judicial branches, or relating to the time within which any rights shall accrue or determine, or within which any act shall or shall not be performed, by any person subject to the jurisdiction of this state, it shall be understood and intended that the said time shall be the United States standard time of the zone within which the act is to be performed or the right shall accrue or determine.
History.s. 1, ch. 3916, 1889; RS 1307; GS 1739; s. 1, ch. 6938, 1915; RGS 2954; CGL 4681.

F.S. 1.02 on Google Scholar

F.S. 1.02 on CourtListener

Amendments to 1.02


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 1.02

Total Results: 199  |  Sort by: Relevance  |  Newest First

Copy

United States v. Irey, 612 F.3d 1160 (11th Cir. 2010).

Cited 1837 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 15669

See Arthur W. Campbell, The Law of Sentencing § 1:2 (2009). The American tradition thus embraced four
Copy

Quality Foods De Centro Am., S.A. & Duroparts De El Salvador, S.A. v. Latin Am. Agribusiness Dev. Corp., S.A., 711 F.2d 989 (11th Cir. 1983).

Cited 521 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 25132

bring this action under the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, 2, and the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 15, 18, 19,
Copy

Joseph MacUba v. Matthew Deboer, Michael Youseff, Charlotte Commissioners, Individually & in Their Off. Capacities, 193 F.3d 1316 (11th Cir. 1999).

Cited 327 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 15 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1181, 45 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1251, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 27986, 1999 WL 982404

Jan Winters. See Charlotte County (Fla.) Code § 1-2-80(H).9 Winters assigned Forgey the task of filling
Copy

Valley Drug Co. v. Geneva Pharm., Inc., 350 F.3d 1181 (11th Cir. 2003).

Cited 258 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2003 WL 22682603

one of the Sherman Antitrust Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1 2 , when it entered into settlement agreements
Copy

Sims v. State, 754 So. 2d 657 (Fla. 2000).

Cited 128 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 2000 WL 193226

by the Governor under s. 922.06. Fla. S.B. 10-A, § 1-2 (2000). Governor Bush signed the bill on January
Copy

United States v. Teresita Sorrels v. NCL (Bahamas), LTD, 796 F.3d 1275 (11th Cir. 2015).

Cited 128 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2015 A.M.C. 2525, 98 Fed. R. Serv. 81, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 13541

habitability, and maintenance purposes.” ASTM F1166-07 at § 1.2. The district court abused its discretion.
Copy

Head v. Medford, 62 F.3d 351 (11th Cir. 1995).

Cited 98 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24150, 1995 WL 472369

process of law....” U.S. Const.Amend. XIV, § 1. 2 . The district court determined that
Copy

Armstrong v. Harris, 773 So. 2d 7 (Fla. 2000).

Cited 77 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 2000 WL 1260014

Constitution: (1) proposal by Legislature, section 1; (2) revision commission, section 2; (3) initiative
Copy

Joseph Richard Redner v. Charles S. Dean, Sheriff of Citrus Cnty., Florida, Robert A. Butterworth, 29 F.3d 1495 (11th Cir. 1994).

Cited 72 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 23252, 1994 WL 419484

County Adult Entertainment Ordinance”. Section 1-2. Authority. The Adult Entertainment Ordinance
Copy

United States v. Madera, 528 F.3d 852 (11th Cir. 2008).

Cited 57 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 11078, 2008 WL 2151267

Constitution: 1) the Non-Delegation Doctrine, Art. I, § 1; 2) the ex post facto clause, Art. I, § 9, cl. 3;
Copy

21 Emp. Benefits Cas. 1625, Pens. Plan Guide (Cch) P 23936c, 11 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 294 Harry L. Hunt v. Hawthorne Assocs., Inc., E. Air Lines Variable Benefit Ret. Plan for Pilots Trust Admin. Comm. of the E. Airlines Variable Benefit Ret. Plan for Pilots, 119 F.3d 888 (11th Cir. 1997).

Cited 51 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

...y drop a defendant from the case without obtaining a Rule 21 order if the defendant has not responded to the original complaint with an answer. See generally 3 Moore's Federal Practice, §§ 15.10, 15.11 (3d ed.1997); 4 Moore's Federal Practice, § 21.02[b] (3d ed.1997) (discussing the interrelationship of Rules 15 and 21 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure)....
Copy

Thigpen v. Bibb Cnty., Georgia, 223 F.3d 1231 (11th Cir. 2000).

Cited 47 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

of the laws." U.S. Const. amend. XIV, § 1. 2 Reeves v. Wilkes, Civ. Action
Copy

Taylor v. State, 355 So. 2d 180 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978).

Cited 46 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

without due process of law ..." U.S.Const. amend. XIV § 1 [2] "The right of the people to be secure in their
Copy

ITPE Pension Fund v. Roger Hall, 334 F.3d 1011 (11th Cir. 2003).

Cited 45 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 30 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1943, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 12477, 2003 WL 21403477

...They point to the definitions section of the Agreement and Declaration of Trust, which states that “[t]he terms Tension Fund’ or ‘Fund’ shall mean all property of every kind held or acquired under the provisions of this instrument.” R2-44, Ex. 2, Ex. A at § 1.02 (emphasis added). According to the Halls, unpaid contributions, because they are unpaid, are not yet “held” or “acquired” by the Fund, and therefore cannot be assets of the fund. We cannot accept the full extent of the Halls’ interpretation of § 1.02....
...ictionary 24 (7th ed.1999). Thus, even property which has not yet formally been transferred to the Plan’s physical control, but which the Plan owns or controls in a contractual sense by virtue of the Agreement, has been “acquired” by the Plan. Section 1.02 is not conclusive of the Plan’s treatment of unpaid employer contributions....
Copy

Adams v. State, 341 So. 2d 765 (Fla. 1976).

Cited 45 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida

1 at 63; and Fla.Laws 1868, Ch. 1637, Subch. 3, § 1, 2 at 63. [6] Fla.Laws 1892, Ch. 2377-94 at 773-76
Copy

United States v. Anthony Chotas, 968 F.2d 1193 (11th Cir. 1992).

Cited 45 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 18791, 1992 WL 181753

defendants. See U.S.S.G., Ch. 1, Pt. A, at § 1.2-1.3; United States v. Rolande-Gabriel,
Copy

Bush v. Holmes, 919 So. 2d 392 (Fla. 2006).

Cited 44 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 2006 WL 20584

duty to provide education under article IX, section 1. 2. The Constitution Revision Commission The majority
Copy

United States v. Eugene Donald Schaltenbrand, 930 F.2d 1554 (11th Cir. 1991).

Cited 41 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 9299, 1991 WL 63745

for whom action is to be taken,” id. § 1(2), and the “agent” is “[t]he one who is to act.”
Copy

Kendrick v. Everheart, 390 So. 2d 53 (Fla. 1980).

Cited 40 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida

either parent. NOTES [1] U.S.Const. Amend. XIV, § 1. [2] Art. I, § 2, Fla. Const. [3] Art. I, § 21, Fla
Copy

Am. Home Assur. v. NAT. RR CORP., 908 So. 2d 459 (Fla. 2005).

Cited 39 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 2005 WL 1580639

subsidiary or affiliated system companies of [CSX]." Id. § 1.2. In the indemnification provision, KUA specifically
Copy

State v. City of Orlando, 170 So. 887 (Fla. 1936).

Cited 38 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 126 Fla. 251, 1936 Fla. LEXIS 1449

provided for by Section 5108 C.G.L., Chapter 11854, Section 1, 2, Acts 1927, if no petition for rehearing has
Copy

Duty Free World v. Miami Perfume Junction, 253 So. 3d 689 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018).

Cited 35 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

certain others in equity. See, e.g., 1 Dobbs § 1.2, at 11; id., § 4.1(1), at 556; id.
Copy

Fed. Deposit Ins. v. Gonzalez-Gorrondona, 833 F. Supp. 1545 (S.D. Fla. 1993).

Cited 34 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5004, 1993 WL 401875

unfounded."); but see 1987 Fla. Laws 1685, ch. 245, § 1(2) (June 30, 1987) ("The Legislature further finds
Copy

Dept. of Agr. & Consum. Serv. v. Bonanno, 568 So. 2d 24 (Fla. 1990).

Cited 29 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1990 WL 141444

as a court within the meaning of article V, section 1.[2] 1A Nichols' The Law of Eminent Domain § 4.104
Copy

JCC, Inc. v. Commodity Futures Trading Comm'n, 63 F.3d 1557 (11th Cir. 1995).

Cited 29 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 26075, 1995 WL 514512

§ 4, 10 and § 1.2 of the Commission’s regulations, 17 C.F.R. § 1.2. As EDCO was acting as
Copy

Shotts v. OP Winter Haven, Inc., 86 So. 3d 456 (Fla. 2011).

Cited 29 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 36 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 665, 2011 Fla. LEXIS 2764, 2011 WL 5864830

for this agreement appear to be provided in section 1.2 of the Limitation of Liability. The benefit for
Copy

Jordan Chapel Freewill Baptist Ch. v. Dade Cnty., 334 So. 2d 661 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976).

Cited 28 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

...not enacted in compliance with Florida Statute 166.041. Dade County contends that Section 166.041 provides a minimum standard to be followed by municipalities when enacting ordinances and it is therefore inapplicable. Dade County also maintains that Section 1.02 in its own Charter constitutes its controlling procedural requirements....
Copy

United States v. Madera, 474 F. Supp. 2d 1257 (M.D. Fla. 2007).

Cited 28 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3029, 2007 WL 141283

Constitution: (1) the Non-Delegation Doctrine, Art. I, § 1; (2) the Ex Post Facto Clause, Art I, § 9, cl. 3; (3)
Copy

Walton Cnty. v. Stop Beach Renourishment, 998 So. 2d 1102 (Fla. 2008).

Cited 27 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 2008 WL 4381126

...[10] We recognize that the littoral rights to access, use, and view are different from so-called "true easements" in that littoral rights are incidental to littoral ownership and do not require a separate act of creation. See Jon W. Bruce, The Law of Easements and Licenses in Land § 1.02 (1995)....
Copy

Berry v. CSX Transp., Inc., 709 So. 2d 552 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998).

Cited 26 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1998 WL 85601

scientific sophistication on the part of judges." Id. at § 1-2.3. "Whereas Frye require[s] judges to survey the
Copy

APA Excelsior III L.P. v. Premiere Tech., Inc., 476 F.3d 1261 (11th Cir. 2007).

Cited 26 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 2269, 2007 WL 286258

.... . the Stockholder shall vote (or cause to be voted) the Shares and the Other Securities [in Xpedite] in favor of the Merger [with Premiere]. . . . *** SECTION 1.02 IRREVOCABLE PROXY....
Copy

Armbrister v. Roland Int'l Corp., 667 F. Supp. 802 (M.D. Fla. 1987).

Cited 26 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7642

injury to the plaintiff. See 15A C.J.S. Conspiracy § 1(2) (1967); Renpak v. Oppenheimer, 104 So.2d 642, 646
Copy

Movie & Video World, Inc. v. Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners, 723 F. Supp. 695 (S.D. Fla. 1989).

Cited 25 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12310, 1989 WL 120556

entertainment establishments. Rules of Construction of Section 1-2 of the Palm Beach County Code shall govern. F
Copy

Marriott Corp. v. Metro. Dade Cnty., 383 So. 2d 662 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980).

Cited 25 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 16695

...Town of Monticello, 159 Fla. 134, 31 So.2d 905 (1947). To a large extent, the language of the charter of the municipality or, as in this case, the county, determines what action may be taken by resolution and what must be done by ordinance. The Dade County, Florida, Charter § 1.02(A) provides: The Board shall ......
Copy

City of Miami v. Keton, 115 So. 2d 547 (Fla. 1959).

Cited 24 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida

...re charter. In conclusion, appellant points out that it does not question the power of Dade County under the metropolitan charter to repeal any part of the city charter, but it contends that such repeal must be accomplished in the manner provided by Section 1.02(b), Metropolitan Charter, and Section 16, Article III of the Constitution, none of which has been complied with....
Copy

Gfc v. Sg, 686 So. 2d 1382 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997).

Cited 24 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1997 WL 24244

crime in many jurisdictions. 2 C.J.S. Adultery § 1-2 (1972). Society was *1385 so scornful of bringing
Copy

Concord Florida, Inc. v. Lewin, 341 So. 2d 242 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976).

Cited 24 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

...aforementioned instruction amounted to a "negligence per se" charge. The Miami Beach Fire Code is one paragraph which adopts the Dade County Fire Prevention and Safety Code (hereinafter referred to as the Code). The pertinent portion of said Code is Section 1.02(1) which provides that: "The provisions of this Code shall apply equally to new and existing conditions except that existing conditions not in strict compliance with the terms of this Code shall be permitted to continue where the excepti...
Copy

United States v. Mason, 510 F. Supp. 2d 923 (M.D. Fla. 2007).

Cited 21 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37122, 2007 WL 1521515

Constitution: (1) Non-delegation doctrine, Art. I, Section 1; (2) Ex Post Facto Clause, Art. I, Section 9, Clause
Copy

Metro. Dade Cty. Bd. of Cty. Comm'rs v. Rockmatt Corp., 231 So. 2d 41 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970).

Cited 21 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

...d for in the county's ordinance, and averred that the action of the Commission was denial of the special permits which the plaintiff had requested. See footnote 2. The defendants averred their regulation of such businesses was under subsection 12 of section 1.02(A) of the Dade County Home Rule Charter, conferring authority to "Establish, co-ordinate, and enforce zoning and such regulations as are necessary for the protection of the public," and subsection 16 of that section of the charter, empow...
Copy

City of St. Petersburg v. Calbeck, 114 So. 2d 316 (Fla. 2d DCA 1959).

Cited 20 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal

surrounding circumstances. 27 C.J.S. Disorderly Conduct § 1(2). In 4 Fla.Jur. 597, Breach of the Peace and Related
Copy

Quirk v. Anthony, 563 So. 2d 710 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990).

Cited 20 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1990 WL 52319

Stat. (Supp. 1984) (corresponds to Ch. 84-41, § 1(2), Laws of Fla.). It is undisputed that Mr. Dignam
Copy

State v. Aiuppa, 298 So. 2d 391 (Fla. 1974).

Cited 19 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida

definition of what material is obscene found in § 1(2) of Ch. 73-120, Laws of Florida, 1973, is sufficient
Copy

Cable Holdings of Georgia, Inc., D/B/A Smyrna Cable Tv v. Home Video, Inc., Wometco Cable Tv of Georgia, Inc., & S.M. Landress, 825 F.2d 1559 (11th Cir. 1987).

Cited 18 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 11527

1 and 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act (15 U.S.C. § 1, 2). Moreover, Cable Holdings alleged that the merger
Copy

Jones v. State, 658 So. 2d 122 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995).

Cited 17 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1995 WL 385753

...The trial bench needs a concise outline to assist it in: (1) addressing the necessary issues, (2) announcing the necessary conclusions of law with supporting findings of fact, and (3) providing the defendant the appropriate advice. See generally Bench Book for United States District Judges § 1.02-2 to -5 (3d ed....
...Caution should be used in denying the right to represent one's self on the defendant's failure to pass an informal bar exam. These questions may, however, be helpful in convincing a defendant that self-representation could be a mistake. Additional questions can be located in the Bench Book for United States District Judges, § 1.02-2 to -5 (3d ed....
Copy

Gorss Motels, Inc. v. Safemark Sys., LP, 931 F.3d 1094 (11th Cir. 2019).

Cited 16 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

declaratory rulings. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.2 (a) ("The Commission may ... issue
Copy

State, Dept. of Com., Etc. v. Matthews Corp., 358 So. 2d 256 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978).

Cited 15 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 23 Wage & Hour Cas. (BNA) 998

rule was patterned essentially after 29 C.F.R. § 1.2(a) (1977), which in turn implements the Davis Bacon
Copy

Cardenas v. State, 867 So. 2d 384 (Fla. 2004).

Cited 15 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 2004 WL 351171

presumption of impairment to .08 percent. See ch. 93-124, § 1-2, 4, Laws of Fla. [8] DUI and DUBAL were originally
Copy

Mark S. Mais v. Gulf Coast Collection Bureau, Inc., 768 F.3d 1110 (11th Cir. 2014).

Cited 14 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 61 Communications Reg. (P&F) 309, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 18554, 2014 WL 4802457

express consent exception. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.2(a) (“The Commission may, in accordance with section
Copy

Miller's Ale House, Inc. v. Boynton Carolina Ale House, Inc., 702 F.3d 1312 (11th Cir. 2012).

Cited 14 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 105 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1345, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 26049, 2012 WL 6629202

McCarthy on Trademarks & Unfair Competition § 1:2 (4th ed. 2012). On the other hand, it creates a
Copy

Jacksonville Newspaper Printing Pressmen & Assistants' Union No. 57 v. Florida Publ'g Co., 340 F. Supp. 993 (M.D. Fla. 1972).

Cited 14 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 80 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2286, 16 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 972, 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14070

reference. The present controversy centers around Section #1(2) of the written contract: 1(2). It is further
Copy

Commodity Futures Trading Comm'n v. Gibraltar Monetary Corp., 575 F.3d 1180 (11th Cir. 2009).

Cited 13 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 16598, 2009 WL 2150900

should be held vicariously liable under 17 C.F.R. § 1.2 for Gibraltar Monetary Corporation, Inc.'s ("GMC")
Copy

Walker v. Cash Register Auto Ins., 946 So. 2d 66 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006).

Cited 13 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2006 WL 3751489

became effective July 1, 2002. See Ch. 2002-77, § 1-2, at 908-09, Laws of Fla. The primary purpose of
Copy

State v. City of Orlando, 170 So. 887 (Fla. 1936).

Cited 12 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 127 Fla. 280

provided for by Section 5108 C.G.L., Chapter 11854, Section 1, 2, Acts 1927, if no petition for rehearing has
Copy

United States v. Campanella D'Angelo, 819 F.2d 1062 (11th Cir. 1987).

Cited 12 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 7861

insufficient to support a conviction under 18 U.S.C.App. § 1?02(a)(1). 3 He argues that the evidence
Copy

Hall v. State, 752 So. 2d 575 (Fla. 2000).

Cited 12 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 2000 WL 44045

57.081, 57.085, Fla. Stat. (1999); ch. 96-106, § 1, 2, at 93-95. Quite importantly, these amendments
Copy

Shaktman v. State, 529 So. 2d 711 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988).

Cited 11 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 1988 WL 26257

undetected. J. Carr, The Law of Electronic Surveillance § 1.2(b) (2d ed. 1987). "[E]lectronic surveillance is
Copy

Maxwell Bldg. Corp. v. Euro Concepts, LLC, 874 So. 2d 709 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004).

Cited 11 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2004 WL 1196895

became effective July 1, 2002. See Ch.2002-77, § 1-2 at 908-09, Laws of Fla. The primary purpose of section
Copy

Pinellas Cnty. v. Lake Padgett Pines, 333 So. 2d 472 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976).

Cited 10 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal

373, enacted by the 1974 Legislature, Ch. 74-114, § 1(2), Laws of Florida, provided for creation of Regional
Copy

Payton Hlt. Care v. Est. of Campbell, 497 So. 2d 1233 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986).

Cited 9 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal

relating to the operation of the Nursing Home." Section 1.2 of Article II provides that Southeastern's staff
Copy

Gray v. State, 742 So. 2d 805 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999).

Cited 8 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1999 WL 461922

[1] See Art. I, § 1; Art. II, § 1; Art. III, § 1. [2] Art. I, § 10, Fla. Const.; Art. I, § 9, Art.
Copy

Morley Music Co. v. Cafe Cont'l, Inc., 777 F. Supp. 1579 (S.D. Fla. 1991).

Cited 8 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16919, 1991 WL 247170

...limited time to authors and inventors the exclusive right to their respective writings and discoveries. It is from this clause that the federal authority to enact copyright and patent legislation is derived. 1 Melville B. Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright § 1.02 at 1-30 (1991)....
Copy

Mansur v. Eubanks, 368 So. 2d 645 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979).

Cited 8 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

immediately afterward, that it be securely closed. See § 1.2.10.11 of the National Fuel Code, adopted by § 17
Copy

O'Neal v. Fla. a & M Univ. Ex Rel. Bd. of Trs., 989 So. 2d 6 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008).

Cited 8 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2008 WL 2276307

in certain others in equity. See, e.g., 1 Dobbs § 1.2, at 11; id., § 4.1(1), at 556; id., § 4.1(3), at
Copy

Geffken v. Strickler, 778 So. 2d 975 (Fla. 2001).

Cited 8 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 2001 WL 81761

57.081, 57.085, Fla. Stat. (1999); ch. 96-106, § 1, 2, at 93-95. The legislative history of these amendments
Copy

White Constr. Co. v. Martin Marietta Materials, Inc., 633 F. Supp. 2d 1302 (M.D. Fla. 2009).

Cited 8 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29467, 2009 WL 961135

Martin Marietta breached its implied duties. Section 1.2 of the MSA simply grants Martin Marietta the
Copy

Stanley v. United States, 574 F. Supp. 474 (S.D. Fla. 1983).

Cited 7 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12217

liberties. L. Tribe, American Constitutional Law § 1-2, at 3 n. 7 (1978) (relying on 14 The Papers of Thomas
Copy

Cenac v. Florida State Bd. of Acct., 399 So. 2d 1013 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981).

Cited 7 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19992

violation of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, 2 (1975), as well as violation of appellant's right
Copy

State v. McInnes, 153 So. 2d 854 (Fla. 1st DCA 1963).

Cited 7 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

exceeding ten years. As amended Laws 1957, c. 57-254, § 1."[2] An analysis of the foregoing statute clearly reveals
Copy

Alachua Cnty. v. State, 737 So. 2d 1065 (Fla. 1999).

Cited 7 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 24 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 212, 1999 Fla. LEXIS 803, 1999 WL 311324

...ed by electric utilities within the county rights-of-way." Thus, Alachua County essentially concedes its argument by failing to contest that there is no nexus between its alleged "reasonable rental charge," Alachua County, Fla. Ordinance *1068 97-12 § 1.02(G) (Aug....
Copy

Hialeah Auto., LLC v. Basulto, 22 So. 3d 586 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009).

Cited 7 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 566, 2009 WL 187584

coercion, or unconscionability.” 1 Domke, supra, § 1:2, at 1-6. The First District has explained: Although
Copy

Florida Bd. of Pharmacy v. Webb's City, Inc., 219 So. 2d 681 (Fla. 1969).

Cited 7 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1969 Fla. LEXIS 2476

decision of the trial court holding invalid Section 1(2) (f) of Chapter 67-521, Laws of Florida, which
Copy

Feltman v. Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners of Metro. Dade Cnty. (In Re S.E.L. Maduro (Florida), Inc.), 205 B.R. 987 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 1997).

Cited 7 times | Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | 37 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1048, 10 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 227, 1997 Bankr. LEXIS 182, 30 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 469

Escrow Account. Trustee's Exhibit C. Pursuant to section 1.2.2 of the APA, the monies deposited by I.T.O.
Copy

Coral Lakes Cmty. Ass'n v. Busey Bank, N.A., 30 So. 3d 579 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010).

Cited 7 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 1799, 2010 WL 567251

reasonably discoverable by the mortgagee. Ch. 2008-175, § 1-2, at 2034-35, Laws of Fla. Thus, instead of being
Copy

Dade Cnty. v. Am. Re-Ins. Co., 467 So. 2d 414 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985).

Cited 6 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 922

increased to twelve per cent per annum. See ch. 82-42, § 1-2, Laws of Fla. [5] Although the date the trial court
Copy

Dzikowski v. United States Ex Rel. Internal Revenue Serv. (In Re Cummings), 381 B.R. 810 (S.D. Fla. 2007).

Cited 5 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 100 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 7072, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 94079, 2007 WL 4800642

claim from and after the petition claim. (CP 204 § 1.2). The IRS and Tim Givens Building & Remodeling,
Copy

Najjar v. Reno, 97 F. Supp. 2d 1329 (S.D. Fla. 2000).

Cited 5 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8185, 2000 WL 726358

enumerated in section 1(2) of this Act." ISA §§ 1, 22, 64 Stat. 987, 1006, 1008 (1950). Section 1(2)(C) of the
Copy

Willingham v. Sec'y of Health, Educ. & Welfare, 377 F. Supp. 1254 (S.D. Fla. 1974).

Cited 5 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 1974 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7912

...[20] Record at 16. [21] Record at 15. [22] Record at 13. [23] 20 C.F.R. Subpart P, App. at 323-38 (1973). The criteria for establishing a mental impairment appear in § 12.00 of the appendix; for epilepsy, in § 11.00; for diabetes, in § 9.08 and for arthritis, in § 1.02....
Copy

Perkins v. Dept. of Health & Rehab. Servs., 452 So. 2d 1007 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

necessary to implement the workfare pilot project" and § 1(2)(h) authorizes imposition of sanctions for non-compliance
Copy

Dennis v. Kline, 120 So. 3d 11 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 9614, 2013 WL 3014115

Trawick’s Redfearn Wills & Admin. in Florida, § 1.2 (2010-11 ed.)), rev. granted, 103 So.3d 138 (Fla
Copy

Thomas v. City of West Palm Beach, 299 So. 2d 11 (Fla. 1974).

Cited 5 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida

the Plumbing Code (chapter 36). (Ord.No. 983-67, § 1, 2-13-67.)" "Sec. 27-22. Same — Authority of building
Copy

Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Curtiss, 327 So. 2d 82 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14644

extinguished by the settlement. ..." Ch. 75-108, § 1(2)(b), (d) (emphasis added). Under § 1(4)(b), enforcement
Copy

Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Hagan, 750 So. 2d 83 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1999 WL 1082472

2d 1200 (1994); 38 Am.Jur.2d, Fright and Shock, § 1, 2.; Comment Restatement of Torts (Second) § 436A
Copy

Loubna Elkaousi Mendoza v. Sec'y, Dep't of Homeland Sec., 851 F.3d 1348 (11th Cir. 2017).

Cited 5 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2017 WL 1208415, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 5739

marriage. 8 C.F.R. § 204.2(a)(l)(ii); see 8 C.F.R. § 1.2 (defining “director” to include -district director)
Copy

Timoney v. City of Miami Civilian Investigative Panel, 990 So. 2d 614 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 13452, 2008 WL 4058028

of police and the public; ... (Ord. No. 12188, § 1, 2-14-02) [emphasis added]. [3] Sec. 11.5-31. Procedures
Copy

Rudolph F. Matzer & Assocs., Inc. v. Warner, 348 F. Supp. 991 (M.D. Fla. 1972).

Cited 4 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11666

the meaning of applicable regulations. 41 C.F.R. § 1-2.404-2(a) (1969). The Court of Appeals held, further
Copy

Transamerica Ins. Co. v. Barnett Bank of Marion Cnty., NA, 524 So. 2d 439 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 5 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 879, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 774, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1158, 1988 WL 23644

...417, 206 A.2d 49 (1965); White and Summers, Uniform Commercial Code § 22-5 (2d ed. 1980). [10] See Nat'l Surety Co. v. State Nat'l Bank of Frankfort, 454 S.W.2d 354 (Ky. 1970). [11] See McAtee v. U.S. Fidelity & Guar. Co., 401 F. Supp. 11 (N.D.Fla. 1975); Williams, 1 Florida Law of Secured Transactions in Personal Property, § 1.02 at 53 (1980)....
Copy

Apthorp v. Detzner, 162 So. 3d 236 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 2461, 2015 WL 733322

Philip J. Padovano, Florida Appellate Practice, § 1:2 (2015 ed.) (acknowledging the appellate court’s
Copy

Carr v. Crosby Builders Supply Co., Inc., 283 So. 2d 60 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 6588

Stat. 1971, repealed Fla.Laws 1972, ch. 72-1 § 1. [2] Fla. Standard Jury Instr. in Civil Cases, Instr
Copy

Miller v. Hayman, 766 So. 2d 1116 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2000 WL 1175682

Am. Jur.2d, Abatement, Survival, and Revival, § 1. [2] Our holding is limited to costs awarded under
Copy

Chem. Bank v. First Trust of New York (In Re Se. Banking Corp.), 156 F.3d 1114 (11th Cir. 1998).

Cited 3 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

creditors); see also 1 David G. Epstein et ah, Bankruptcy § 1-2, at 3, § 1-7, at 12 (West 1992) (describing these
Copy

Compucredit Holdings Corp. v. Akanthos Capital Mgmt., LLC, 661 F.3d 1312 (11th Cir. 2011).

Cited 3 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 22662, 2011 WL 5419663

pleadings is affirmed. AFFIRMED. NOTES [1] 15 U.S.C. § 1. [2] We recite the facts in the light most favorable
Copy

Commodity Futures Trading Comm'n v. Sidoti, 178 F.3d 1132 (11th Cir. 1999).

Cited 3 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 13610, 1999 WL 407022

§ 4, and CFTC Rule 1.2, codified at 17 C.F.R. § 1.2; 2. Wuensch individually with liability for Trinity’s
Copy

Red-Eyed Jack, Inc. v. City of Daytona Beach, 165 F. Supp. 2d 1322 (M.D. Fla. 2001).

Cited 3 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21588, 2001 WL 1044897

calendar days from the date of submittal." Art. 3 § 1.2 provides the following general procedure for the
Copy

Hunt v. Hawthorne Assocs., Inc., 119 F.3d 888 (11th Cir. 1997).

Cited 3 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 21 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1625, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 20761, 1997 WL 437161

...y drop a defendant from the case without obtaining a Rule 21 order if the defendant has not responded to the original complaint with an answer. See generally 3 Moore's Federal Practice, §§ 15.10, 15.11 (3d ed.1997); 4 Moore's Federal Practice, § 21.02[5][b] (3d ed.1997) (discussing the interrelationship of Rules 15 and 21 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure)....
Copy

Pacheco De Perez v. AT&T Co., 139 F.3d 1368 (11th Cir. 1998).

Cited 3 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1998 WL 207890

8 Ga.Code. Ann. § 1-2-10 (1990). Defendants argue that under § 1-2-10, plaintiffs cannot proceed
Copy

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Palm Beach Mall, LLC, 177 So. 3d 37 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 14520, 2015 WL 5712341

Count II, Wells Fargo argued that, pursuant to section 1.2(a) of the Guaranty, Simon was liable for PBM’s
Copy

Brechner v. Inc. Vil. of Lake Success, 25 Misc. 2d 920 (Fla. 1960).

Cited 2 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 208 N.Y.S.2d 365

services, restaurants serving the general public. Section 1.2 of the ordinance established "performance standards"
Copy

State v. Rendon, 832 So. 2d 141 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2002 WL 31422852

protection of the laws." U.S. Const. amend. IV, § 1. [2] Title I of the ADA provides that "No covered
Copy

City of Jacksonville Beach v. Albury, 291 So. 2d 82 (Fla. 1st DCA 1973).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

...he properties (of whatever nature), rights, capacities, privileges, powers, franchises and immunities, and be subject to all of the liabilities, obligations and duties of the former governments from and after the effective date of this charter... . "Section 1.02....
Copy

In Re Fontainebleau Las Vegas Contract Litig., 716 F. Supp. 2d 1237 (S.D. Fla. 2010).

Cited 2 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2010 WL 2164183

and conditions hereof." (Cr. Agr. § 2.1(c)). Section 1.2 states that "hereof . . . shall refer to this
Copy

Seminole Cnty. v. City of Winter Springs, 935 So. 2d 521 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2006 WL 1459775

of the Charter. That section would provide: Section 1.2. Rural Boundary and Rural Area a. There is hereby
Copy

Tavormina v. Timmeny, 561 So. 2d 681 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 1990 WL 62895

compensation and severance payments contemplated by section 1.2, quoted above. Timmeny moved for summary judgment
Copy

Newman v. Eli Witt Co. (In Re Eli Witt Co.), 20 B.R. 778 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1982).

Cited 2 times | Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | 1982 Bankr. LEXIS 4130

...Considering the foregoing, this Court is satisfied that Newman was a "terminated member" under the Plan and because disability benefits under the Plan were available only to "active members", Newman is not entitled to the relief he seeks. This conclusion is based on the following: Section 1.02 of the Plan, page 3-A, sets forth the classes of members under it. According to § 1.02(a), "active members" are those who are "in service" and who have not reached [their] Normal Retirement Date." "Service" is defined in § 1.02(a), page 3, and in § 1.01(A)(a), page 3-2, as "employment as an employee" with Eli Witt....
...Because the Plaintiff has not worked for the company in more than six years and because he is now only 53 years of age, the Plaintiff is clearly not an "active member" under the Plan. Instead, the Plaintiff is a "terminated member" under the Plan. § 1.02(b) defines a "terminated member" as a former active member who is not in service, who is entitled to non-forfeitable benefits under the Plan, and who has not reached his normal [or early] retirement dates....
Copy

PMI Inv., Inc. v. Rose (In Re Prime Motor Inns, Inc.), 167 B.R. 261 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 1994).

Cited 2 times | Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida.

set forth in the PMI Loan. (See PMI Exh. 6 at Section 1.2.) Under the PMI Loan, one method by which the
Copy

Bd., Cty. Com'rs, Sarasota v. Webber, 658 So. 2d 1069 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1995 WL 385684

construction and excavation may not occur. Id. at § 1.2. The Board, however, has the discretion to grant
Copy

Holderbaum v. Carnival Corp., 87 F. Supp. 3d 1345 (S.D. Fla. 2015).

Cited 2 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 182319, 2015 WL 728362

(See Edmond Depo., D.E. 82-1 at 193-95, 216.) Section 1.2.3.2 of the IMO’s International Safety Management
Copy

In Re Yates Dev., Inc., 258 B.R. 36 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2000).

Cited 2 times | Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | 45 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 980, 14 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 159, 2000 Bankr. LEXIS 1641, 37 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 74, 2000 WL 33128671

...Class 2 Claims-Allowed Secured Claims-This class consists of the claim of Wisne. III. Class 3 Claims-Allowed Unsecured Claims-This class consists of Old Kings' unliquidated, unsecured claim. IV. Class 4 Interests-This class consists of interests of holders of common stock of Debtor. *41 (Doc. 66.) 32. Section 1.02 of the Plan defines an Allowed Claim with respect to any class as a claim: (i) that has been allowed by a Final Order, (ii) that (x) either is scheduled, other than a Claim that is scheduled as disputed, contingent or unliquidated or (y)...
...ates and defines. Old Kings points out that because the claim is contingent and unliquidated and because Debtor has appealed the Court's Order Overruling Objection to Old King's Amended Proof of Claim, the claim is not an allowed claim as defined by Section 1.02 of the plan....
Copy

M & B Printing Equip. Corp. v. Atl. Nat'l Bank (In Re M & B Printing Equip. Corp.), 18 B.R. 411 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 1981).

Cited 2 times | Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | 1981 Bankr. LEXIS 2429

32 Am.Jur.2d, Factors and Commission Merchants, § 1, 2, 17-23. "The law regulating the transactions of
Copy

Frates v. Nichols, 140 So. 2d 321 (Fla. 3d DCA 1962).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

Barrett & Seago, Partners and Partnerships, Ch. 9, § 1.2. The appellant must be considered as having "voluntarily"
Copy

Miami-Dade Cnty. Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners v. an Accountable Miami-Dade, 208 So. 3d 724 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 14069

...rsuant to the Charter. . The record shows that although the next regular Board of County Commissioners meeting would have been on May 3, 2016, the item was scheduled on the May 17, 2016 meeting in order to comply with the publication requirements of Section 1.02(B) of the Charter....
Copy

Smyl, Inc. v. Gerstein, 364 F. Supp. 1302 (S.D. Fla. 1973).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 1973 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11899

at the definition of obscenity contained in Section 1(2) of the state law: Material is obscene if considered
Copy

State v. Saylor, 625 So. 2d 907 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1993 WL 407931

enacted by the legislature in 1967. Ch. 67-308, § 1(2)(c), Laws of Fla. Thus, whatever right section 3
Copy

F/S Airlease II, Inc. v. Air Florida, Inc. (In Re Air Florida, Inc.), 44 B.R. 798 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 1984).

Cited 1 times | Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | 1984 Bankr. LEXIS 4517

...in a contest between Swig and a state law attachment creditor that levies on Engine 093 and Swig, the attaching creditor's claim to title would have priority over Swig's claim of title. E. Transfer of Ownership of Engine 093 28. Pursuant to Section 11.02 of the Master Lease, Air Florida was required to promptly notify FSA in writing that Engine 929 had been destroyed and to "replace such Engine as soon as reasonably possible" by duly conveying to the owner of the destroyed engine (Swig) title to a replacement engine free and clear of all liens....
...d at the time (the existence of which we need not address here), Air Florida would have been entitled to retain the insurance proceeds it received with respect to Engine 929, but even then only if it "shall have fully performed the terms of Section 11.02," and in particular, conveyed a replacement engine to Swig....
...Air Florida's duty to convey title to a replacement engine for Engine 929 is a duty to sell goods to Swig in exchange for valuable consideration (the insurance proceeds received by Air Florida and the other rights generally of Air Florida under the User Lease). 31. The Court holds that Sections 11.02 and 12.03(B) of the Master Lease clearly evidence the general intent of the parties that Air Florida must convey title to a replacement engine as quickly as possible when a leased engine is destroyed and that if Air Florida promptly notifies FSA...
...r to the commencement on July 3, 1984 of Air Florida's Chapter 11 case and that in any event Air Florida is estopped by its conduct from asserting that title was not so transferred. 32. The Court holds further that, in light of the requirement under Section 1.02 of the Master Lease that title to a replacement engine be transferred free and clear of all liens and encumbrances and in light of the fact that Lockheed Finance Corporation ("Lockheed") is a record lienholder and Heleasco is a record le...
...1½ years and that it ought to be deemed to have transferred title to it to Swig. However, the Court holds that when Engine 880 was damaged, it did not suffer an "Event of Loss" as defined in Section 1.12 of the Master Lease and as used in Section 11.02 thereof, and therefore Section 11.02 with respect to replacing engines did not apply....
Copy

Payne v. City of Miami, 913 So. 2d 1260 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2005 WL 3054154

effective on Tuesday, July 6. See Miami City Code § 1-2 (stating rules for computation of time). The fact
Copy

Est. of Michelle Evette McCall v. United States, 642 F.3d 944 (11th Cir. 2011).

Cited 1 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 10705, 2011 WL 2084069

separation of powers in Article II, § 8 and Article V, § 1; (2) the right to trial by jury under Article I, §
Copy

High Point, LLLP v. Nat'l Park Serv., 850 F.3d 1185 (11th Cir. 2017).

Cited 1 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2017 WL 908200, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 4080

Park Service later responded that under 36 C.F.R. § 1.2(a)(3), ownership of the marshlands makes no difference
Copy

In Re Harloff, 247 B.R. 523 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2000).

Cited 1 times | Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | 13 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 164, 43 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1834, 2000 Bankr. LEXIS 378, 2000 WL 390416

...In support of this proposition the Disbursing Agent relies on the Order of Confirmation of the Joint Plan which, according to the Disbursing Agent, operates as a complete bar of any and all claims of Textron. The particular provisions of the Joint Plan relied on by the Disbursing Agent provides: *527 Pursuant to Article I, section 1.02, the Textron Claim is defined as follows: The RH Class 9 Claim and the RHP Class 5 Claim of Textron against each of Roger Harloff and Harloff Packing, as joint and several obligors, under the Textron Loan documents, which Claim is (I) in...
Copy

Est. of Michelle Evette McCall v. United States, 134 So. 3d 894 (Fla. 2014).

Cited 1 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 39 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 104, 2014 WL 959180, 2014 Fla. LEXIS 933

guarantee in article II, section 3 and article V, section 1; (2) the right to trial by jury under article I
Copy

Danner Constr. Co., Inc. v. Hillsborough Cty., 608 F.3d 809 (11th Cir. 2010).

Cited 1 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 11803, 2010 WL 2301117

that the county’s ordinance conflicts with Section 1.2 The majority is also correct in noting that
Copy

State Ex Rel. Davis v. A. C. L. R. R. Co., 140 So. 817 (Fla. 1932).

Cited 1 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 103 Fla. 1204

in question stopped under the provisions of Section 1 (2) of the act; (c) that this Court acquired jurisdiction
Copy

State ex rel. Davis v. Atl. Coast Line R.R., 103 Fla. 1204 (Fla. 1932).

Cited 1 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 140 So. 817

in question stopped under the provisions of Section 1 (2) of the act; (c) that this Court acquired jurisdiction
Copy

Schvaneveldt v. Mastec North Am., Inc., 306 F. Supp. 2d 1177 (S.D. Fla. 2004).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2242, 2004 WL 305594

other half in the form of Defendant's stock. Section 1.2(d) of the Agreement treats Defendant's stock
Copy

Anderson Engines, Inc. v. Briggs & Stratton Corp., 531 F. Supp. 1155 (M.D. Fla. 1982).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12029

and Magneto, Inc. in violation of Sherman Act Section 1. (2) Plaintiff was terminated as an ASD pursuant
Copy

City of Miami v. Airbnb, 260 So. 3d 478 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

rental or lease basis for limited periods of time.” § 1.2 (emphasis added). Generally speaking, therefore
Copy

USA Interactive v. Dow Lohnes & Albertson, P.L.L.C., 328 F. Supp. 2d 1294 (M.D. Fla. 2004).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15608, 2004 WL 1769263

full interest in Jovon to a proposed trust.[51] Section 1.2(B) of the shareholder agreement provides that
Copy

Manorcare Health Servs., Inc. v. Stiehl, 22 So. 3d 96 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 11756, 2009 WL 2568264

for this agreement appear to be provided in section 1.2 of the Limitation of Liability. The benefit for
Copy

PMI, by & through its special servicer, Orix Capital Markets, LLC v. Palm Beach Mall, LLC, Simon Prop. Grp., LP., a/k/a Simon Prop. Grp., L.P., d/b/a DeBartolo Realty P'ship, LTD. & Simon Palm Beach, LLC (Fla. 4th DCA 2015).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

Count II, Wells Fargo argued that, pursuant to section 1.2(a) of the Guaranty, Simon was liable for PBM’s
Copy

State v. Williams, 227 So. 2d 331 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1969).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5090

as authorized by Florida law. (Ord.No. C-2010, § 1, 2-18-64)” The similar state statute provides: “F
Copy

Chem. Bank v. First Trust (11th Cir. 1998).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

see also 1 David G. Epstein et al., Bankruptcy § 1-2, at 3, § 1-7, at 12 (West 1992) (describing these
Copy

Smith v. Williams, 819 F. Supp. 2d 1264 (M.D. Fla. 2011).

Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 52 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1045, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 109173, 2011 WL 4459184

Administrator is defined as the Employer (id. at § 1.2), which in turn is defined as Orion Bancorp, Inc
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 2011).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

2011.See s. 2, Ch. 2011-109, Laws of Fla. 3 Section 1(2)(a), Ch. 2011-109, Laws of Fla. 4 See s. 1, Ch
Copy

Miami-Dade Cnty. Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners v. an Accountable Miami-Dade (Fla. 3d DCA 2016).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

...the signatures.” 3 The record shows that although the next regular Board of County Commissioners meeting would have been on May 3, 2016, the item was scheduled on the May 17, 2016 meeting in order to comply with the publication requirements of Section 1.02(B) of the Charter. 4 This Court takes judicial notice of the video of the May 17, 2016 Board meeting (http://miamidade.gov/wps/portal/Main/webcasting). 5 The 120-day period expired on August 26, 2016. 6 The Supervisor of Elections...
Copy

In re Advisory Opinion to the Governor, 239 So. 2d 247 (Fla. 1970).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1970 Fla. LEXIS 2480

election 1970. Laws of Florida (1970) Ch. 70-80, § 1(2), requires the resignation of the holder of an *250office
Copy

Kojo Khayrallah v. State of Florida (Fla. 1st DCA 2022).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

action. Cf. 1 W. LAFAVE, SUBSTANTIVE CRIMINAL LAW § 1.2(c) (2d ed. 2003) (observing that “many crimes are
Copy

State ex rel. Lehman v. Buchanan, 190 So. 2d 594 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1966).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 4930

...y provided therein is more than the minimum penalty provided in the state law governing such an offense. We hold appellant’s contentions are without merit and affirm. The ordinance is valid under the requirements of title and notice, as set out in § 1.02(b) of the Metro Charter....
Copy

Samantha Helfrich, individually & etc. v. City of Jacksonville & the Bd. of etc., 204 So. 3d 39 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 14746

Padovano, Florida Appellate Practice, § 1:2 (2016 ed.) (acknowledging the appellate court’s
Copy

Keene v. Zoning Bd. of Adjustment, 22 So. 3d 665 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 16130, 2009 WL 3485968

...enforced to regulate the various land use categories in the Plan. Specifically, the Development Code provides: "This Land Development Code is enacted pursuant to the requirements and authority of Section 163.3202, Florida Statutes. . . ." Dev. Code § 1.02....
Copy

Samantha Helfrich, individually & etc. v. City of Jacksonville & the Bd. of etc. (Fla. 1st DCA 2016).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

Philip J. Padovano, Florida Appellate Practice, § 1:2 (2015 ed.) (acknowledging the appellate court’s
Copy

Macuba v. Cnty. of Charlotte, FL (11th Cir. 1999).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Jan Winters. See Charlotte County (Fla.) Code § 1-2- 80(11).9 Winters assigned Forgey the task of filling
Copy

Macuba v. Cnty. of Charlotte, FL (11th Cir. 1999).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Jan Winters. See Charlotte County (Fla.) Code § 1-2-80(11).9 Winters assigned Forgey the task of filling
Copy

Capeletti Bros., Inc. v. Metro. Dade Cnty., 776 F. Supp. 1561 (S.D. Fla. 1991).

Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19346, 1991 WL 220606

...On each individual construction project, the department must also suggest what types of race-conscious measures, if any, should be utilized on the project in light of the number and types of Black-owned firms likely to be available to participate in the project. § 1.02....
Copy

Gibson v. Wright, 179 So. 2d 245 (Fla. 1st DCA 1965).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1965 Fla. App. LEXIS 3748

* * * As stated in [8] Am.Jur., Boundaries, Section 1.02, page 819: ‘The object of a resurvey is to furnish
Copy

United States v. Matthew William Wheeler (11th Cir. 2021).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Lowenfels, Bromberg & Lowenfels on Securities Fraud § 1:2 (2d ed.). USCA11 Case: 17-15003 Date Filed:
Copy

MSPA Claims 1, LLC v. Infinity Auto Ins. Co., 344 F. Supp. 3d 1377 (S.D. Fla. 2018).

Published | District Court, S.D. Florida

the assignee must be approved by the Client" (id. § 1.2), here referring to FHCP. B. Plaintiff Lacks Standing
Copy

Rush v. Dep't of State, 748 F. Supp. 1548 (S.D. Fla. 1990).

Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13629, 1990 WL 157769

classifying the documents. D. Section 1.2, Classification Authority Section 1.2 of Executive Order 12356 enumerates
Copy

Doty v. City of Tampa, 947 F. Supp. 468 (M.D. Fla. 1996).

Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17681, 1996 WL 683649

substantive due process, U.S. Const, amend. XIV § 1, (2) a denial of Doty’s “day in court,” U.S. Const
Copy

CompuCredit Holdings Corp. v. Akanthos Capital Mgmt., LLC (11th Cir. 2011).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

issued in 2005. 1 15 U.S.C. § 1. 2 We recite the facts in the light most
Copy

Luria v. ADP, Inc. (In re Taylor, Bean & Whitaker Mortg. Corp.), 593 B.R. 862 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2018).

Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida

Id. at 1301. Doc. 157, Ex. C (MSA Annex C § 1.2). Doc. 157, Ex. C (MSA at Annex C, § 1). This
Copy

Ronald Colbert v. United States, 785 F.3d 1384 (11th Cir. 2015).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 7511, 2015 WL 2119080

Department of Personnel Management.... (AFA § 1.2). The Government argues that, in light of the need
Copy

Citizens for Smart Growth v. Peters, 716 F. Supp. 2d 1215 (S.D. Fla. 2010).

Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54284, 2010 WL 1817332

historical, current, and planned growth." Id. at Section 1.2, "Need for the Action," AR 7250. FDOT referred
Copy

Est. of Michelle Evette McCall v. United States (11th Cir. 2011).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

separation of powers in Article II, § 3 and Article V, § 1; (2) the
Copy

Bailey v. State, 246 So. 3d 555 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

Legislature amended section 776.032(4). See Ch. 2017-72, § 1-2, Laws of Fla. As amended, the statute now provides
Copy

Downs v. Ledoux-Nottingham, 219 So. 3d 244 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2017 WL 2200229, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 7179

1 . U.S. Const., Art. IV, § 1. 2 . Pub. L. 96-611, §§ 6-10, 96 Stat.
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1977).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

In 1976 the city adopted a home rule charter. Section 1.02, Art. I of the new charter provides that all
Copy

R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Pamela Ciccone, etc., 190 So. 3d 1028 (Fla. 2016).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 41 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 118, 2016 Fla. LEXIS 630, 2016 WL 1163361

the case individually.” Newberg on Class Actions § 1:2 (5th ed.); see also 67A C.J.S. Parties § 23 (“The
Copy

James Clay v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue (11th Cir. 2021).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

regulations” in certain circumstances. 25 C.F.R. § 1.2. But of course, the Settlement Act is a statute—not
Copy

Bb Inlet Prop., LLC v. 920 N. Stanley Partners, LLC (Fla. 4th DCA 2020).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

of another.’” Id. (RESTATEMENT (THIRD) OF PROP. § 1.2 cmt. a. (AM. LAW INST. 2000)). Upland owners
Copy

Danner Constr. Co., Inc. v. Hillsborough Cty. (11th Cir. 2010).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

that the county’s ordinance conflicts with Section 1.2 The majority is also correct in noting that
Copy

Danner Constr. Co., Inc. v. Hillsborough Cty. (11th Cir. 2010).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

that the county’s ordinance conflicts with Section 1.2 The majority is also correct in noting that
Copy

Gustavo Bojorquez, etc. v. State of Florida (Fla. 2025).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida

of such certificate or permit.” Ch. 2012-247, § 1(2), Laws of Fla. And it said that, subject to PTC
Copy

CFTR v. Trinity Fin. Grp., 178 F.3d 1132 (11th Cir. 1999).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

§ 4, and CFTC Rule 1.2, codified at 17 C.F.R. § 1.2; 2. Wuensch individually with liability
Copy

CFTR v. Trinity Fin. Grp., 178 F.3d 1132 (11th Cir. 1999).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

§ 4, and CFTC Rule 1.2, codified at 17 C.F.R. § 1.2; 2. Wuensch individually with liability
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1989).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

the total millage shall not exceed 1 mill." Section 1(2)(b), Art. V, Ch. 87-498, Laws of Florida, states:
Copy

Haslett v. State, 225 So. 2d 186 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1969).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5408

require or authorize him to collect public money”. Section 1(2) of the 1957 Act, now F.S. § 219.01(2), F.S.A
Copy

William T. Thigpen, Jr. v. Larry Just., 216 F.3d 1314 (11th Cir. 2000).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

” U.S. Const. amend. XIV, § 1. 2 protection claims constitute
Copy

United States v. William Irey (11th Cir. 2010).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

See Arthur W. Campbell, The Law of Sentencing § 1:2 (2009). The American tradition thus embraced four
Copy

Darnell Perkins Washington v. State of Florida (Fla. 1st DCA 2019).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

establishing entitlement to immunity. See Ch. 2017-72, § 1-2, Laws of Fla. Now, once a defendant makes a prima
Copy

Am. Civil Liberties Union of Florida Inc. v. Dixie Cnty. Florida, 797 F. Supp. 2d 1280 (N.D. Fla. 2011).

Published | District Court, N.D. Florida | 2011 WL 2784238

monument must submit an application to the Board. Id. § 1.2. As a condition for approval, Commissioners may
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1998).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

"State Requirements for Educational Facilities." Section 1.2(46) of the publication defines "Impact or Service
Copy

Sanibel-Captiva Taxpayers' Ass'n v. Cnty. of Lee, 132 So. 2d 334 (Fla. 1961).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1961 Fla. LEXIS 2014

...ard purposed to purchase as an item of cost, retire the Kinzie ferry franchise and to construct the bridge and causeway over the same or substantially the same area. Appellee says that the Kinzie agreement does no more than implement Chapter 159 and Section 1.02(E) of the resolution, which was authorized by the resolution in that cost includes “the acquisition of land or interests therein or any other properties deemed necessary or convenient for the project.” From a reading of the resolutio...
...led. Section 159.03(4), Florida Statutes, F.S.A., authorized this purchase. The Baynard agreement was another effort on the part of the Board to implement the resolution and thereby take care of other elements of cost of the project. Chapter 159 and Section 1.02(E) of the resolution in terms provide that the Board may undertake “such other expenses as may be necessary or incident to the financing * * * ” It accordingly appears that the Baynard agreement should be read in the light of Section 159.02(13) and Section 1.02(E) of the resolution, both of which have to do with "costs” and cover many factors....
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 2001).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

with procedures set forth in Chapter 2001-01, section 1(2), Laws of Florida. 3. When showing autopsy photographs
Copy

Heidig v. Heckler, 608 F. Supp. 135 (S.D. Fla. 1985).

Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23595

...2 Upon a proper procession through the sequential evaluation, it is this Court’s conclusion that Plaintiff has sustained her burden of establishing a disability. Specifically, Plaintiff’s impairment is a listed impairment falling within the purview of 20 C.F.R. Section 404 Appendix 1 section 1.02 and 10.04. Those sections state: 1.02 Active rheumatoid arthritis and other inflammatory arthritis With both A and B A....
...142). None of the foregoing medical evidence is rebutted in the record. It is clear to this Court that whether Plaintiffs disease is established to be rheumatoid arthritis or systemic lupus erythmatosis, Plaintiffs impairments fall within both sections 1.02 and 10.04 of Appendix 1....
Copy

Rosa & Raymond Parks Inst. for Self Dev. v. Target Corp. (11th Cir. 2016).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

movement in the history of the United States.” Id. at § 1(2). 2 So significant to the Civil
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1987).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

) Section 1(5), Ch. 81-405, Laws of Florida. Section 1(2) of the act recognizes that "the property comprising
Copy

Louisville & Nashville R.R. v. Yarbrough, 57 Fla. 101 (Fla. 1909).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida

(3rd ed.) § 17, 71; Joyce on Law of Nuisances, § 1, 2, 368; Graves v. Shattuck, 35 N. H. 257, 69 Am.
Copy

Florida Sav. Bank & Real Est. Exch. v. Smith, 21 Fla. 258 (Fla. 1885).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida

Hicks & Bro.; description of property, parts of section, 1, 2, 9, Brooklyn, valuation, 800, 20.00 aid.” Neither
Copy

Crossroads Lounge, Inc. v. City of Miami, 195 So. 2d 232 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 5332

variance from Ordinance No. 6871, Article XXVII, Section 1 (2) to permit relocation of liquor license from
Copy

United States v. Doe, 957 F. Supp. 1244 (M.D. Fla. 1997).

Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 1997 WL 117683

recommendation of the Pardon Attorney. According to Section 1-2.108 of the United States Attorneys Manual, “[t]he
Copy

Metro. Dade Cnty. Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners v. Rockmatt Corp., 231 So. 2d 41 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1970).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6884

...for in the county’s ordinance, and averred that the action of the Commission was denial of the special permits which the plaintiff had requested. See footnote 2. The defendants averred their regulation of such businesses was under subsection 12 of section 1.02(A) of the Dade County Home Rule Charter, conferring authority to “Establish, co-ordinate, and enforce zoning and such regulations as are necessary for the protection of the public,” and subsection 16 of that section of the charter, e...
Copy

Gogoleva v. Soffer, 187 So. 3d 268 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 2230, 2016 WL 626131

C6-APV, on November 22, 2012 (“Accident”). Section 1.2 of the Release also included a provision that
Copy

Save Calusa Inc. v. Miami-dade Cnty. (Fla. 3d DCA 2023).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

merely directory.” Miami-Dade County, Fla., Code § 1-2(h) (2021); see also Fla. Tallow Corp. v. Bryan
Copy

City of Miami v. Airbnb (Fla. 3d DCA 2018).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

rental or lease basis for limited periods of time.” § 1.2 (emphasis added). Generally speaking, therefore
Copy

Vill. of Palmetto Bay, Florida v. Miami-Dade Cnty., Florida (Fla. 3d DCA 2024).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

...nvened a Special Council Meeting and passed Resolution No. 2021-18, initiating conflict resolution proceedings against the County. See generally § 164.1052, Fla. Stat. (2021). Resolution No. 2021-18 determined that the Bridge Resolution violated section 1.02 of the Miami-Dade Charter, which provides that funds may only be appropriated by ordinance, and the County used the COVID Ordinance to improperly circumvent traditional notice requirements for a nonemergency matter. On March 12...
...indebtedness (other than refunding indebtedness), or which provides a penalty or establishes a rule or regulation for the violation of which a penalty is imposed shall be by ordinance. Miami-Dade County, Fla., Code Part 1, Art. 1, § 1.02(A) (2020) (emphasis added). Unlike resolutions, ordinances require published notice. Id. at § 1.02(B); see also Miami-Dade County, Fla., Code Part I, Citizens’ Bill of Rights § (A)(6) (2020)....
...The Board was authorized by both statute and Charter to adopt an ordinance amending the fiscal year 2020–2021 budget. § 129.06(2), Fla. Stat. (“The board at any time within a fiscal year may amend a budget for that year . . . .”); Miami-Dade County, Fla., Code Part 1, Art. 1, § 1.02(A) (2020); see also id....
Copy

8330 Tokyo Valentino, LLC v. City of Miami, 990 F. Supp. 2d 1327 (S.D. Fla. 2013).

Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2013 WL 6869393, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 182178

“Specified Anatomical Areas” as herein defined in Section 1.2 of this Code. Such establishment may or may not
Copy

Antoinette Tynes v. State of Florida, 262 So. 3d 851 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

overcome a defendant’s claim of immunity. Ch. 2017-72, § 1-2, Laws of Fla. Now, after the defendant makes a prime
Copy

Florida Coll. of Bus. v. Accrediting Council for Indep. Colleges & Schs., 954 F. Supp. 256 (S.D. Fla. 1996).

Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20423, 1996 WL 775111

cannot show that it satisfies the requirements of Section 1-2-100(a).[1] FLORIDA began its Cosmetology Program
Copy

Miller's Ale House, Inc. v. Boynton Carolina Ale House, Inc. (11th Cir. 2012).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

McCarthy on Trademarks & Unfair Competition § 1:2 (4th ed. 2012). On the other hand, it creates a
Copy

Benny Jacobs v. Tempur-Pedic Int'l, Inc. (11th Cir. 2010).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

be illegal.” 15 U.S.C. § 1. 2 distributors and by engaging
Copy

Gillyard v. State, 704 So. 2d 165 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 13934, 1997 WL 777699

United States District Court Judges, vol. 1 section 1.02(C) (Federal Judicial Center, 4th ed.1996).
Copy

State ex rel. Ervin v. Mellick, 68 So. 2d 824 (Fla. 1953).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1953 Fla. LEXIS 1800

...h office during the [two-year] term of the Mayor so appointing him, and until his successor shall be duly appointed, confirmed and qualified; provided he shall not sooner be removed or suspended under the provisions of the Ordinances of the City.” Section 1.02, Code, City of Lake Wales-....
...repealed, amended or modified by the municipality which is hereby created,” this provision did not have the effect of carrying forward into the new law the invalid ordinance under which Cooper was appointed “chief of police” on June 17, 1952. Section 1.02, Code, City of Lake Wales....
Copy

Ronald Hight, Jr. v. State of Florida, 253 So. 3d 1137 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

the bill into law on June 9, 2017. Ch. 2017-72, § 1-2, Laws of Fla. The amendment shifted the burden
Copy

Duty Free Americas, Inc. v. The Estee Lauder Companies, Inc. (11th Cir. 2015).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

violation of § 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1; (2) conspiracy to monopolize, in violation of § 2
Copy

Hunt v. Hawthorn Assocs., Inc. (11th Cir. 1997).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

...the amended complaint simply replicated the allegations and prayers for relief contained in the original complaint. For example, as before, Count I was titled “Failure to Provide Practice, §§ 15.10, 15.11 (3d ed. 1997); 4 Moore’s Federal Practice, § 21.02[5][b] (3d ed....
Copy

Basile v. Aldrich, 70 So. 3d 682 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 13243, 2011 WL 3696309

Trawick’s Redfeam Wills and Administration in Florida, § 1.2 (2010-11 ed.), “[t]he Legislature created the Florida
Copy

Florida, Dep't of Bus. Reg. v. United States Dep't of the Interior, 768 F.2d 1248 (11th Cir. 1985).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

in the best interest of the Indians.” 25 C.F.R. § 1.2. On January 16, 1981, the Department took title
Copy

Odulene Dormescar v. U.S. Attorney Gen., 690 F.3d 1258 (11th Cir. 2012).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 17158

§ 1101 (a)(20); accord 8 C.F.R. § 1.2. 2 . This area of the law is plagued
Copy

Odulene Dormescar v. U.S. Attorney Gen. (11th Cir. 2012).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

laws.” 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(20); accord 8 C.F.R. § 1.2. 2 This area of the law is plagued
Copy

Scottsdale Ins. v. Lock Towns Cmty. Mental Health Ctr., Inc., 442 F. Supp. 2d 1287 (S.D. Fla. 2006).

Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57041, 2006 WL 2349176

the standpoint of the insured." CGL Policy, Section 1.2 Section II, titled "Who is an Insured," defines
Copy

De Perez v. AT&T Co., 139 F.3d 1368 (11th Cir. 1998).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

this state. Ga. Code. Ann. § 1-2-10 (1990). Defendants argue that under § 1-2-10, plaintiffs cannot proceed

This Florida statute resource is curated by Graham W. Syfert, Esq., a Jacksonville, Florida personal injury and workers' compensation attorney. For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.