Florida/Georgia Personal Injury & Workers Compensation

You're probably overthinking it. Call a lawyer.

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 11.02 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 11.02 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 11.02 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 11.02

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title III
LEGISLATIVE BRANCH; COMMISSIONS
Chapter 11
LEGISLATIVE ORGANIZATION, PROCEDURES, AND STAFFING
View Entire Chapter
11.02 Notice of special or local legislation or certain relief acts.The notice required to obtain special or local legislation or any relief act specified in s. 11.065 shall be by publishing the identical notice as provided in chapter 50 or circulated throughout the county or counties where the matter or thing to be affected by such legislation shall be situated one time at least 30 days before introduction of the proposed law into the Legislature or, if the notice is not published on a publicly accessible website as provided in s. 50.0311 and there is no newspaper circulated throughout or published in the county, by posting for at least 30 days at not fewer than three public places in the county or each of the counties, one of which places shall be at the courthouse in the county or counties where the matter or thing to be affected by such legislation shall be situated. Notice of special or local legislation shall state the substance of the contemplated law, as required by s. 10, Art. III of the State Constitution. Notice of any relief act specified in s. 11.065 shall state the name of the claimant, the nature of the injury or loss for which the claim is made, and the amount of the claim against the affected municipality’s revenue-sharing trust fund.
History.s. 1, ch. 3708, 1887; RS 66; GS 67; RGS 78; CGL 94; s. 1, ch. 13791, 1929; s. 2, ch. 69-52; s. 5, ch. 69-216; s. 1, ch. 78-302; s. 1, ch. 78-307; s. 2, ch. 96-318; s. 9, ch. 2021-17; s. 9, ch. 2022-103.

F.S. 11.02 on Google Scholar

F.S. 11.02 on CourtListener

Amendments to 11.02


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 11.02

Total Results: 105  |  Sort by: Relevance  |  Newest First

Copy

Diamond Crystal Brands, Inc. v. Food Movers Int'l Inc., 593 F.3d 1249 (11th Cir. 2010).

Cited 271 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 786, 2010 WL 100965

pickup the Splenda in Savannah. See, e.g., O.C.G.A. § 11-2-319(3) ("Unless otherwise agreed of in any case
Copy

Prewitt Enter., Inc. v. Org. of Petroleum Exporting Countries, 353 F.3d 916 (11th Cir. 2003).

Cited 148 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 57 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 558, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 25724, 2003 WL 22965587

apply to service on entities specified under § 11(2) of the Austrian Service Act. Dist. Ct. Doc. 87
Copy

Newland v. Hall, 527 F.3d 1162 (11th Cir. 2008).

Cited 86 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 10433, 2008 WL 2042822

See Jack Goger, Georgia Criminal Trial Practice § 11-2 (2007). At the hearing, defense counsel may subpoena
Copy

Shernita LUCAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis W. SULLIVAN, Sec'y of the U.S. Dept. of Health & Human Servs., Defendant-Appellee, 918 F.2d 1567 (11th Cir. 1990).

Cited 79 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 21560, 1990 WL 183561

...trollable by medication, but that she had failed to take her medications as prescribed. The AU provided the following explanation of his decision: Although claimant at various times has alleged seizures of a frequency which would meet either Listing 11.02 or 11.03, neither claimant’s description of the frequency or severity of the seizures is considered entirely credible....
...Section 11.00 of the Listing of Impairments provides guidance for the determination of whether a neurological impairment is of a severity that renders a person disabled within the meaning of the Social Security Act. With respect to establishing a neurological impairment that meets the criteria of sections 11.02 and 11.03, section 11.00 provides the following: Under 11.02 and 11.03, the criteria can be applied only if the impairment persists despite the fact that the individual is following prescribed anticonvulsive treatment....
...rt of the physician currently providing treatment for epilepsy. Determination of blood levels of ... anticonvul-sive drugs may serve to indicate whether the prescribed medication is being taken. When seizures are occurring at the frequency stated in 11.02 and 11.03, evaluation of the severity of the impairment must include consideration of the serum drug levels....
Copy

Alphamed, Inc. v. B. Braun Med., Inc., 367 F.3d 1280 (11th Cir. 2004).

Cited 55 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 8555, 2004 WL 916005

Alphamed’s recovery. Pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 11-2-708(2), an aggrieved seller may recover “profit
Copy

Owen v. State, 596 So. 2d 985 (Fla. 1992).

Cited 54 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1992 WL 10615

LaFave & Jerold H. Israel, Criminal Procedure § 11.2, at 8 (Supp. 1991) ("[T]he initiation of adversary
Copy

21 Emp. Benefits Cas. 1625, Pens. Plan Guide (Cch) P 23936c, 11 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 294 Harry L. Hunt v. Hawthorne Assocs., Inc., E. Air Lines Variable Benefit Ret. Plan for Pilots Trust Admin. Comm. of the E. Airlines Variable Benefit Ret. Plan for Pilots, 119 F.3d 888 (11th Cir. 1997).

Cited 51 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

participation in or their benefits under the Plan." § 11.2 ("Authority [of Pension Dispute Board]")
Copy

TRM, Inc. v. United States, 52 F.3d 941 (11th Cir. 1995).

Cited 46 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 11940, 1995 WL 258682

Jr., Administrative Law Treatise § 11.2 (1994). 12 . The Eleventh Circuit
Copy

Mahon v. United States Dep't of Agric., 485 F.3d 1247 (11th Cir. 2007).

Cited 42 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 11017, 2007 WL 1365976

Congressional directive, the agency promulgated 7 C.F.R. § 11.2(b) (2002), which provides that a person “shall
Copy

Royal Oak Landing Home-owner's Ass'n v. Pelletier, 620 So. 2d 786 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993).

Cited 38 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 1993 WL 152424

of sections 11.2 and 13.9 of the Declaration. Section 11.2 provides: No Lot shall be divided, subdivided
Copy

Advanced Bodycare Solutions, LLC v. Thione Int'l, Inc., 615 F.3d 1352 (11th Cir. 2010).

Cited 38 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 17742, 2010 WL 3323741

lots to be separately accepted . . . ." O.C.G.A. § 11-2-612(1). "Whenever nonconformity or default with
Copy

Roboserve, Ltd., Cross-Appellant v. Tom's Foods, Inc., a Delaware Corp., Cross-Appellee, 940 F.2d 1441 (11th Cir. 1991).

Cited 36 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 16 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 987, 20 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1321, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 20568, 1991 WL 157918

requirements of the Georgia Statute of Frauds, O.C.G.A. § 11-2-201, and should not have been submitted to the
Copy

T.W.M. v. Am. Med. Sys., Inc., 886 F. Supp. 842 (N.D. Fla. 1995).

Cited 29 times | Published | District Court, N.D. Florida | 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7231, 1995 WL 319071

defendant. 1 White & Summers, Uniform Commercial Code § 11-2, at 528 (3rd ed. 1988). The complaint does not
Copy

Investacorp, Inc. v. Arabian Inv. Banking Corp. (Investcorp) E. C., 931 F.2d 1519 (11th Cir. 1991).

Cited 26 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

603 (1979). . See J. MCCARTHY, supra note 6, § 11:2. . Vision Center v. Opticks, Inc., 596 F.2d 111
Copy

Cramer v. Chiles, 33 F. Supp. 2d 1342 (S.D. Fla. 1999).

Cited 23 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 1999 WL 53039

Developmentally Disabled program. 1996, Fla.Laws ch. 96-417, § 11(2). [2] During the pendency of this action, Plaintiff
Copy

Hill v. Hoover Co., 899 F. Supp. 2d 1259 (N.D. Fla. 2012).

Cited 15 times | Published | District Court, N.D. Florida | 2012 WL 4510855, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 142212

(citing 1 White & Summers, Uniform Commercial Code § 11-2, at 528 (3rd ed.1988)). This Court finds that the
Copy

Wilkerson v. Olcott, 212 So. 2d 119 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1968).

Cited 13 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

...We are of the opinion that such case does not support the position taken by the appellant because that case involved an attorney's charging lien which is separate and distinct from the retaining lien claimed by the appellant. We think the question can be answered by reference to the Integration Rule of The Florida Bar, Section 11.02(4), 32 F.S.A....
Copy

Bonvento v. Bd. of Pub. Instruction, Palm Beach Cty., 194 So. 2d 605 (Fla. 1967).

Cited 12 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida

...school purposes. There is yet another serious constitutional defect in this act. In February of 1965 there was published in a local newspaper in West Palm Beach, pursuant to the requirements of Section 21, Article III of the Florida Constitution and Section 11.02, Florida Statutes 1963, F.S.A., a notice of intention to apply to the Legislature for the passage of certain local legislation....
Copy

Coral 97 Assocs. v. Chino Elec., Inc., 501 So. 2d 69 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987).

Cited 11 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 12 Fla. L. Weekly 256

Trawick, Jr., Trawick's Florida Practice & Procedure § 11-2 (1986 ed.). In these circumstances, Florida Rule
Copy

State v. City of Miami Springs, 245 So. 2d 80 (Fla. 1971).

Cited 11 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida

concur. NOTES [1] Fla.Con. of 1885, Art. VIII, § 11. [2] Id. at (6).
Copy

Bartelt v. Bartelt, 579 So. 2d 282 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991).

Cited 10 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 1991 WL 72015

McGovern, Kurtz & Rein, Wills, Trusts & Estates, § 11.2 (1988) ("The word `heirs' does not always refer
Copy

Hancock v. Sapp, 225 So. 2d 411 (Fla. 1969).

Cited 10 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida

judice derives its organic jurisdiction under Section 11(2), Article V, Constitution of Florida, which
Copy

Pycsa Panama, S.A. v. Tensar Earth Tech., Inc., 625 F. Supp. 2d 1198 (S.D. Fla. 2008).

Cited 10 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31457, 2008 WL 1775409

conditions in contracts between merchants.[38] Section 11-2-207 of Georgia's UCC, which is titled *1250
Copy

St. Vincent's Ctr. v. Mem'l Healthcare, 967 So. 2d 794 (Fla. 2007).

Cited 9 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 32 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 556, 2007 Fla. LEXIS 1595, 2007 WL 2492345

...nstitutional classification scheme to be procedurally barred as they did not file a cross-appeal to this Court on this issue. Regardless, we agree with the First District that there is no merit in this claim. See St. Vincent's, 928 So.2d at 435. [2] Section 11.02, Florida Statutes (2004), provides the notice requirements for special laws: The notice required to obtain special or local legislation or any relief act specified in s....
...he county or counties where the matter or thing to be affected by such legislation shall be situated. Notice of special or local legislation shall state the substance of the contemplated law, as required by s. 10, Art. III of the State Constitution. § 11.02, Fla....
Copy

Pinellas Cnty. v. Laumer, 94 So. 2d 837 (Fla. 1957).

Cited 9 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida

...Florida, and affidavit of proof of such publication, together with true copy of such notice, was duly attached to this Act when the Bill therefor was introduced in the Legislature, and accompanied said Bill throughout the Legislature as required by Section 11.02 and 11.03, Florida Statutes 1941, and the Legislature hereby declares that said notice and affidavit are sufficient in form and in substance and that said Section 21 of Article 3 of the Constitution and said Sections 11.02 and 11.03 have been complied with in every respect....
Copy

The Florida Bar v. Knowles, 500 So. 2d 140 (Fla. 1986).

Cited 9 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 55 U.S.L.W. 2437, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 62, 1986 Fla. LEXIS 3019

...iation), 9-102(B)(3) (failure to maintain complete records of clients' property), and 9-102(B)(4) (failure to promptly deliver to client property client is entitled to receive) of the Code of Professional Responsibility, as well as article XI, Rules 11.02(3)(a) (committing acts contrary to honesty, justice, or good morals), 11.02(4) (misappropriation of trust funds), and 11.02(4)(b) (failure to maintain records of clients' funds and accounts) of the Integration Rule, and Bylaws Section 11.02(4)(c) (failure to apply proper trust accounting procedures)....
Copy

In Re PAVCO Enter., Inc., 172 B.R. 114 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1994).

Cited 9 times | Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | 8 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 176, 1994 Bankr. LEXIS 1473, 1994 WL 518932

...Safran, Fla.1953, 68 So.2d 553, 557-58; Diehl v. Gibbs, Fla.App.1965, 173 So.2d 719, 720. *118 To overcome the failure to notice termination of the Lease, in the documentation involved here, the Landlord relies on the language in the Paragraph cited earlier, 11.02 of the lease, which states that, "[U]pon service of such notice or the failure to cure the default within the time prescribed in the notice, this Lease shall forthwith terminate." This provision in the lease is not consistent with the Statute....
Copy

Alimenta (u.s.a.), Inc. v. Anheuser-Busch Companies,inc., Alimenta (u.s.a.), Inc., Cross-Appellee v. Anheuser-Busch Companies, Inc., Cross-Appellant, 803 F.2d 1160 (11th Cir. 1986).

Cited 8 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

is whether the Parole Evidence Rule, O.C. G.A. § 11-2-202, provides a basis to disturb the jury’s finding
Copy

Pinkney v. State, 74 So. 3d 572 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011).

Cited 7 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 18473, 2011 WL 5600041

generally 2 Wayne R. LaFave, Substantive Criminal Law, § 11.2 (2d ed. 2003). To constitute the common law crime
Copy

The Florida Bar v. Adler, 589 So. 2d 899 (Fla. 1991).

Cited 7 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 16 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 739, 1991 Fla. LEXIS 1989, 1991 WL 238643

...[1] The referee recommended that Adler be found guilty of violating the following: Disciplinary Rule 9-102(A), Code of Professional Responsibility, for commingling his *900 funds or funds belonging to his business entities with trust funds; Florida Bar Integration Rules, article XI, rule 11.02(4) for using client trust funds for purposes other than the specific purpose for which the funds were entrusted to him; Florida Bar Integration Rule Bylaws, article XI, section 11.02(4)(c)2.c. for failing to maintain, preserve, and produce original cancelled checks for a trust account existing between March 1983 through January 1984; section 11.02(4)(c)2.f. for failing to maintain, preserve, and produce client ledger cards; section 11.02(4)(c)2.g. for failing to maintain, preserve, and produce bank statements; sections 11.02(4)(c)3.a.(i) and (ii) for failing to maintain, preserve, and produce for inspection monthly reconciliations and comparisons and annual listings; and section 11.02(4)(c)3.d....
Copy

The Florida Bar v. Hartman, 519 So. 2d 606 (Fla. 1988).

Cited 7 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 13 Fla. L. Weekly 61, 1988 Fla. LEXIS 120, 1988 WL 6026

...Respondent failed to satisfy the debts as agreed and kept $491.83 of this money without providing an accounting, allegedly because he was contesting the amount owed him. As to count one, the referee recommended respondent be found guilty of violating Rule 11.02(4)(b) (failure to maintain required records or to produce them upon proper direction); Disciplinary Rules 9-102(A) (commingling) and (B) (failure to preserve the identity of funds of a client, notify client of receipt of funds, maintain complete records of client's funds, and promptly pay to client funds which the client is entitled to receive); and Bylaws Section 11.02(4)(c) (lack of a separate cash receipts and disbursements journal; failure to produce ledger cards or similar records for all receipts and disbursements of trust funds; lack of required trust account balance reconciliations). On count two, the referee recommended respondent be found guilty of violating Rule 11.02(4)(b); DR 6-101(A)(3) (neglect of a legal matter) and DR 9-102(A) and (B). On count three, the referee recommended respondent be found guilty of violating Rule 11.02(4) (failure to comply with trust fund requirements) and DR 9-102(A) and (B)....
Copy

Walker v. State, 483 So. 2d 791 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986).

Cited 6 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 11 Fla. L. Weekly 390

...If the initial intrusion which brings an item into plain view of an officer is not supported by a warrant, the item seized may still be admissible if one of the exceptions to the warrant requirement applies. Coolidge v. New Hampshire, supra. See also: C. Whitebread, Criminal Procedure § 11.02, at 213-214 (1980)....
Copy

Tampa-Hillsborough Cnty. v. AGWS, 608 So. 2d 52 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1992 WL 235303

Education Florida Eminent Domain Practice and Procedure § 11.2. Although a jury can certainly award zero damages
Copy

S. Guar. Ins. Co. v. Zantop Int'l Airlines, Inc., & Puritan Ins. Co., & Warren Assocs., Inc., 767 F.2d 795 (11th Cir. 1985).

Cited 5 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 21118

...To illustrate, a building erected prior to the policy period which collapses during the term of the policy may give rise to a covered claim. Conversely, a building erected during the policy period collapsing after the policy expires cannot give rise to a covered claim. Cf. Long, Products Liability Insurance § 11.02 at 11-12-5 n....
Copy

Johnson v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co., 339 F. Supp. 1178 (M.D. Fla. 1972).

Cited 4 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14949

building or floor area served thereby is occupied." Section 11.2. Marking of Exit Ways. "a. In rooms accommodating
Copy

Deseret Ranches of Florida, Inc. v. St. Johns River Water Mgmt. Dist., 406 So. 2d 1132 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21783

...Petitioner alleges that chapter 77-382, Laws of Florida, which amended section 373.0693(8), Florida Statutes, to establish the Greater St. Johns River Basin, was a special act necessitating the notice requirements of article III, section 10, Florida Constitution, and section 11.02, Florida Statutes....
Copy

Caves v. State, 303 So. 2d 658 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal

1887, 23 Fla. 281, 2 So. 5. Fla. Const. Art. V, § 11(2), 1885, provided: "The justices of the peace shall
Copy

Crocker v. Diland Corp., 593 So. 2d 1096 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1992 WL 13826

permitted. H. Trawick, Florida Practice and Procedure, § 11-2 (1989). Trawick gives no authority for this conclusion
Copy

Hunt v. Hawthorne Assocs., Inc., 119 F.3d 888 (11th Cir. 1997).

Cited 3 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 21 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1625, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 20761, 1997 WL 437161

participation in or their benefits under the Plan.” § 11.2 ("Authority [of Pension Dispute Board]”). . For
Copy

The Florida Bar v. DeSerio, 529 So. 2d 1117 (Fla. 1988).

Cited 3 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 13 Fla. L. Weekly 503, 1988 Fla. LEXIS 892, 1988 WL 89761

...The referee's recommendations on guilt and disciplinary measures are as follows: III. Recommendation as to whether or not the respondent should be found guilty: I recommend that the respondent be found guilty as to Count I, of the following violations of the Code of Professional Responsibility: Integration Rule 11.02(4) (Applying client trust funds to a purpose other than that which the monies were entrusted); Integration Rule 11.02(4)(b) (Failure to preserve his bank records for a period of not less than six (6) years); The Florida Bar Bylaws Section 11.02(4)(c) 2 (Failure to maintain minimum trust accounting records); Bylaws Section 11.02(4)2E (Failure to maintain *1119 separate cash receipts and disbursement journals, including columns for receipts and disbursement journals, transfers and account balance); Bylaws Section 11.02(4)(c)2F (Failure to maintain a separate file or ledger with an individual card or page for each client or matter, showing all individual receipts, disbursements or transfers and any unexpended balance); Bylaws Section 11.02(4)(c)3A (Failure to reconcile trust account on monthly basis); Bylaws Section 11.02(4)(c)3B (Failure to maintain on an annual basis, a detailed listing identifying the balance of the unexpended trust money held for each client or matter); Bylaws Section 11.02(4)(c)3c (Failure to retain for at least six (6) years, reconciliations, comparisons and listings on trust accounts); Bylaws Section 11.02(4)(c)2B (Failure to maintain original or duplicate deposit slips in the case of currency or coin, and additional cash receipt books); Bylaws Section 11.02(4)(c)2c (Failure to maintain original cancelled checks, all of which must be numbered consecutively); DR 1-102(A)(4) (Engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation); DR 1-102(A)(6) (Engaging in conduct tha...
...We see no reliance on uncorroborated hearsay. Respondent argues that the $23,500 was a loan from Wheeler and that he did not need the permission of the client to withhold and withdraw the money from the trust account. The Bar responds that Integration Rule 11.02(4) permits disbursement from a trust fund for specific purposes only, that the client gave specific instructions on disbursement which did not include withholding $23,500 or paying $22,500 on the wife's loan, and further, that the money was taken before respondent went to Texas and failed to verify the oil contract....
Copy

In Re 163rd Street Med. Corp., 47 B.R. 869 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 1985).

Cited 3 times | Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | 1985 Bankr. LEXIS 6378

and thereby terminated the Lease pursuant to Section 11.2 thereof. On November 1, 1984 the Summons and
Copy

Alimenta (u.s.a.), Inc., Cross-Appellee v. Gibbs Nathaniel (Canada) Ltd., Cross-Appellant, 802 F.2d 1362 (11th Cir. 1986).

Cited 2 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 490, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 32516

assumed a greater obligation and subject to Code Section 11-2-614 on substituted performance: (a) Delay
Copy

Matter of Interest on Trust Accounts, 396 So. 2d 719 (Fla. 1981).

Cited 2 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida

...and twenty-five active members of The Florida Bar have petitioned the Court for modifications of the Integration Rule with respect to interest on lawyers' trust accounts. Simultaneously, the Board of Governors of The Florida Bar has petitioned the Court to suspend the operation of existing Integration Rule 11.02(4)(d) pending revisions thereto, and to add to Rule 11.02(4) an express authorization for the investment of individual clients' funds on their behalf....
...In order to obtain comments and views from affected and interested parties, petitioners request that we publish the proposed amendments, and that we set a time period to receive written views and comments. The bar foundation's amendments to our trust account opinion and to Integration Rule 11.02(4)(d), which have been represented to satisfy conditions of the Internal Revenue Service prerequisite to IRS' approval of trust account plans in Florida, are appended to this order. The bar's proposed amendment to Rule 11.02(4), creating a new subsection (f), is also appended....
...ing not later than May 15, 1981. Petitioners shall have until May 25 to respond to any written submissions, following which we will hear oral arguments on the proposals at 9:30 a.m. on June 2, 1981. In the meantime, the operation of Integration Rule 11.02(4)(d) in its present form is suspended until further order of the Court....
...tted. Attorneys will remain free to exercise their discretion to arrange special investments not limited to savings accounts for advances not described in the preceding sentences for the funds of their clients when appropriate; (b) A modification of section 11.02(4)(d) of the Integration Rule is proposed as follows: (d) Trust Savings Accounts....
...such sum of interest and shall assume the defense of the action. (c) The Board of Governors of The Florida Bar at its January 1981, meeting, voted to recommend to this court adoption of an amendment to Florida Bar Integration Rule, article XI, Rule 11.02(4)....
Copy

Alimenta (u.s.a.), Inc. v. Cargill, Inc., 861 F.2d 650 (11th Cir. 1988).

Cited 2 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 7 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 1100, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 16525, 1988 WL 123565

preclude reliance on the allocation remedy of O.C.G.A. § 11-2-615, the seller need expressly assume a greater
Copy

In Re Pruner, 122 B.R. 459 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1990).

Cited 2 times | Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | 1990 Bankr. LEXIS 2650, 1990 WL 212895

debtor was the employer and sole beneficiary. Section 11.2 of the pension plan prohibits the assignment
Copy

Metro. Dade Cnty. v. Bannister, 683 So. 2d 130 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 13154, 1996 WL 229128

Richard J. Pierce, Jr., Administrative Law Treatise § 11.2 at 178-79 (3d ed. 1994). This places the federal
Copy

Chavous v. Goodbred, 30 So. 2d 370 (Fla. 1947).

Cited 2 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 158 Fla. 826, 1947 Fla. LEXIS 644

Article III, Section 21, Florida Constitution and Section 11.02 Fla. Stat., 1941, F.S.A., must be published
Copy

Amendments to the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, 858 So. 2d 1013 (Fla. 2003).

Cited 1 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 28 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 797, 2003 Fla. LEXIS 1779, 2003 WL 22410375

and Jones’ Florida Civil and Criminal Discovery, § 11-2 (4th ed.1997); James L. Underwood, A Guide to Federal
Copy

F/S Airlease II, Inc. v. Air Florida, Inc. (In Re Air Florida, Inc.), 44 B.R. 798 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 1984).

Cited 1 times | Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | 1984 Bankr. LEXIS 4517

...result, in a contest between Swig and a state law attachment creditor that levies on Engine 093 and Swig, the attaching creditor's claim to title would have priority over Swig's claim of title. E. Transfer of Ownership of Engine 093 28. Pursuant to Section 11.02 of the Master Lease, Air Florida was required to promptly notify FSA in writing that Engine 929 had been destroyed and to "replace such Engine as soon as reasonably possible" by duly conveying to the owner of the destroyed engine (Swig) title to a replacement engine free and clear of all liens....
...e) existed at the time (the existence of which we need not address here), Air Florida would have been entitled to retain the insurance proceeds it received with respect to Engine 929, but even then only if it "shall have fully performed the terms of Section 11.02," and in particular, conveyed a replacement engine to Swig....
...Air Florida's duty to convey title to a replacement engine for Engine 929 is a duty to sell goods to Swig in exchange for valuable consideration (the insurance proceeds received by Air Florida and the other rights generally of Air Florida under the User Lease). 31. The Court holds that Sections 11.02 and 12.03(B) of the Master Lease clearly evidence the general intent of the parties that Air Florida must convey title to a replacement engine as quickly as possible when a leased engine is destroyed and that if Air Florida promptly notifies FS...
...more than 1½ years and that it ought to be deemed to have transferred title to it to Swig. However, the Court holds that when Engine 880 was damaged, it did not suffer an "Event of Loss" as defined in Section 1.12 of the Master Lease and as used in Section 11.02 thereof, and therefore Section 11.02 with respect to replacing engines did not apply....
Copy

Compania Panamena De v. Gerstein, 645 So. 2d 55 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 1994 WL 594751

...which — allegedly negligently — conducted a "transit check" inspection of the aircraft in Miami while it was on an entirely different COPA flight the day before the accident. The provisions of the Warsaw Convention simply do not apply to these petitioners. See Lee S. Kreindler, Aviation Accident Law § 11.02[7], at 11-34 (1993) ("The Warsaw Convention only limits the liability of air carriers......
Copy

Edmondson v. Northrup King & Co., 817 F.2d 742 (11th Cir. 1987).

Cited 1 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

provisions of O.C. G.A. § 11-1-201(10) and O.C.G.A. § 11-2-302(1) to support its argument that both questions
Copy

Town of Palm Beach v. Palm Beach Local 1866 of the Int'l Ass'n of Fire Fighters, 275 So. 2d 247 (Fla. 1973).

Cited 1 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 82 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3020, 1973 Fla. LEXIS 4670

Article III of the Florida, Constitution (.1968) and § 11.02, Fla.Stat., F. S.A. Appellee moved for a rehearing
Copy

Ward v. Ret. Bd. of Nfl Player Retire. Plan, 643 F.3d 1331 (11th Cir. 2011).

Cited 1 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

specifically the Plan's spendthrift provision. Section 11.2 of the Plan provided: "Spendthrift" Provision
Copy

Simpson v. K-Mart Corp., 537 So. 2d 677 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 1989 WL 4182

...of a business store aisle — the incident sued upon in the instant case — and was therefore totally irrelevant to the instant case. See § 3121.2(4)(aa), South Florida Building Code. The Fire Code provision arguably prohibits such a placement, see § 11.02(3), Metro-Dade County Fire Prevention & Safety Code, but we conclude it is only applicable where, unlike this case, the "obstruction" is "hazardous to life or property," see § 1.01, Metro-Dade County Fire Prevention & Safety Code....
Copy

Centurion Air Cargo, Inc. v. UNITED PARCEL Serv. CO., 300 F. Supp. 2d 1281 (S.D. Fla. 2004).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1035, 2004 WL 169879

...A review of the record and the arbitration order illustrates that the arbitrator issued his decision based on Centurion's duty to indemnify UPS for damages "resulting to [UPS] either directly or indirectly, from or out of ... (d) any and all Retained Liabilities." Purchase Agreement, § 11.02....
Copy

Ahlers v. Wilson, 867 So. 2d 524 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2004 WL 352187

Philip J. Padovano, FLORIDA APPELLATE PRACTICE § 11.2 (2004 ed.). And see 5 Am.Jur.2d Appellate Review
Copy

The Florida Bar v. Carter, 502 So. 2d 904 (Fla. 1987).

Cited 1 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 12 Fla. L. Weekly 102, 1987 Fla. LEXIS 1527

...or all work delegated to nonlawyer personnel), 1-102(A)(4) (engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation), and 1-102(A)(6) (engaging in conduct adversely reflecting on his fitness to practice law) and article XI, Rule 11.02(3)(a) of the Integration Rule of The Florida Bar (engaging in conduct contrary to honesty, justice or good morals) arising from alleged inadequate recordkeeping in connection with the Robert Tauber estate....
...estate recordkeeping. The referee recommended that Carter be found guilty of violating Disciplinary Rules 3-104(A), (C) and (D). He recommended that Carter be found not guilty of violating Disciplinary Rules 1-102(A)(4) and (6) and article XI, Rule 11.02(3)(a) of the Integration Rule of The Florida Bar....
...ich time his *906 records of account shall be subject to periodic audit by a staff auditor of The Florida Bar. The cost of such audits shall be taxable to the respondent in the manner provided for in Florida Bar Integration Rule By-laws, article XI, section 11.02(4)(c)(6)....
Copy

Fields v. Mylan Pharm., Inc., 751 F. Supp. 2d 1257 (N.D. Fla. 2009).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court, N.D. Florida | 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 130126, 2009 WL 7115134

(citing White & Summers, Uniform Commercial Code § 11-2, at 528 (3rd ed. 1988)). Plaintiff's complaint
Copy

Citi-Lease Co. v. Ent. Fam. Style, Inc., 825 F.2d 1497 (11th Cir. 1987).

Cited 1 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 4 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 842

Gilmore, Securities Interests in Personal Property, § 11.2, at 338. Rather, the terms of the agreements themselves
Copy

Geovision, Inc., Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. Geovision Corp. & Geovision Sys., Inc., Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appellees, 928 F.2d 387 (11th Cir. 1991).

Cited 1 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 18 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1560, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 5884

of a ‘present sale’ that is defined in O.C.G.A. § 11-2-106(1) as ... a sale which is accomplished by the
Copy

In Re Anchor Glass Container Corp., 375 B.R. 683 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2007).

Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | 21 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 23, 2007 Bankr. LEXIS 3136, 48 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 242, 2007 WL 2713388

property. Ga. Real Estate Finance & Foreclosure Law § 11-2 (4th ed.) (citing Ga.Code Ann. § 48-5-9; Suttles
Copy

State v. Cnty. of Santa Rosa, 105 So. 2d 365 (Fla. 1958).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida

Rosa County. It was published as required by Section 11.02, *368Florida Statutes, F.S.A., and met all the
Copy

Florida Dep't of High. Saf. & Motor Vehs. v. Nat'l Saf. Comm'n, Inc., 75 So. 3d 298 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 15767, 2011 WL 4597503

contract may be bilateral, 3 Corbin on Contracts § 11.2 (Rev. Ed.), that is usually because each party
Copy

Florida Bar v. Hosner, 513 So. 2d 1057 (Fla. 1987).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 12 Fla. L. Weekly 527, 1987 Fla. LEXIS 2732

held in trust for clients, and article XI, section 11.02(4)(c) of the Integration Rule Bylaws,3 which
Copy

Florida Bar v. Diaz-Silveira, 477 So. 2d 562 (Fla. 1985).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 554, 1985 Fla. LEXIS 3914

02(4), Disciplinary Rule 9-102(A) and Bylaws Section 11.02(4)(c). The referee recommended that Diaz-Silveira
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1985).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

extinguishment, and control of fires in the district." Section 11(2), Ch. 76-414, Laws of Florida. The Board is
Copy

City of Hialeah v. Pfaffendorf, 90 So. 2d 596 (Fla. 1956).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida

Section 21 of Article III of the Constitution and Section 11,02, F.S. 1955, F.S.A.In this appeal from the decree
Copy

Robinson v. State, 124 So. 2d 714 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1960).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

districts * * ” (emphasis supplied), and Article V, Section 11(2), F.S.A., providing in part, “The justices of
Copy

Wadley Crushed Stone Co., LLC v. Positive Step, Inc. (11th Cir. 2022).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

four years. See Ala. Code § 7- 2-725(1); O.C.G.A. § 11-2-725. Starting with the substance of the
Copy

Florida Bar v. Barksdale, 414 So. 2d 514 (Fla. 1982).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1982 Fla. LEXIS 2424

Rule, article XI, Rule 11.02(4)(b) and (c); Section 11.02(4)(c) 4.a. and 2.d. of The Florida Bar Integration
Copy

Totten v. Okaloosa Cnty. Gas Dist., 164 So. 2d 15 (Fla. 1964).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1964 Fla. LEXIS 2697

constitutional provision is implemented by Section 11.02, Florida Statutes,. F.S.A. We have held that
Copy

Florida Bar, 432 So. 2d 570 (Fla. 1983).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1983 Fla. LEXIS 2360

-*57102(4)(c), the Integration Rule Bylaws, article XI, section 11.02(4)(c), and the Code of Professional Responsibility
Copy

Florida Bar v. Newhouse, 539 So. 2d 473 (Fla. 1989).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 14 Fla. L. Weekly 101, 1989 Fla. LEXIS 142, 1989 WL 21079

02(3)(a) and (b), 11.-02(4)(a), (b), (c) and (d); Section 11.02(4)(c) of the Bylaws under the Integration Rule;
Copy

Midlevelu, LLC v. ACI Info. Grp. (11th Cir. 2021).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Jr., The Law of Easements and Licenses in Land § 11:2, at 807 (2020); see Restatement (Second) of Torts
Copy

Hillsborough Holdings Corp. v. United States (In re Hillsborough Holdings Corp.), 179 B.R. 728 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1995).

Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | 8 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 396, 1995 Bankr. LEXIS 295, 75 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1547

CFR § 601.201(Z)(2); Rev.Proc. 92-1, supra, at § 11.02. See also Dickman v. Commissioner, 465 U.S. 330
Copy

K.D. v. In Re: in the Interest of P.p., R.p., & L.P. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

Florida Bar, Florida Juvenile Law and Practice § 11.2(C) (16th ed. 2020); see § 61.514(1)(b), Fla. Stat
Copy

State ex rel. Lee v. Snowden, 263 So. 2d 205 (Fla. 1972).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1972 Fla. LEXIS 3593

the following ruling of Law: “1. That Article V § 11(2) of the Florida Constitution [F.S.A.] granting
Copy

Florida Bar v. Palley, 471 So. 2d 36 (Fla. 1985).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 308, 1985 Fla. LEXIS 3459

Bylaws under the Integration Rule, article XI, Section 11.02(4)(e) and Disciplinary Rule 9-102(A) of the
Copy

Ward v. Ret. Bd. of Bert Bell/Pete Rozelle NFL Player Ret. Plan, 643 F.3d 1331 (11th Cir. 2011).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

specifically the Plan’s spendthrift provision. Section 11.2 of the Plan provided: “Spendthrift” Provision
Copy

Florida Bar v. Johnson, 526 So. 2d 53 (Fla. 1988).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 13 Fla. L. Weekly 367, 1988 Fla. LEXIS 677, 1988 WL 55628

Bylaws Under the Integration Rule, article XI, Section 11.02(4)(c)(2)(f). [[Image here]] The only records
Copy

Oceans Four Condo. Ass'n v. Stafford, 545 So. 2d 435 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1478, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3402, 1989 WL 63398

unit for sale.” The preference is found under section 11.2 which provides for “Approval of Association
Copy

DiPaolo v. City of Clearwater, 295 So. 2d 349 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7093

the Constitution of Florida (1885) F.S.A.1 and § 11.02, Florida Statutes, F.S.A. The order of the trial
Copy

Florida Bar v. Zyne, 266 So. 2d 668 (Fla. 1972).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1972 Fla. LEXIS 3470

and in violation of Integration Rule art. XI, § 11.02 (4). (3) Letting the Statute of Limitations run
Copy

Scala v. City of Winter Park, 971 F. Supp. 528 (M.D. Fla. 1996).

Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21642, 1996 WL 905614

governing post-action hearings are found in section 11.02 of the Personnel Manual and provide that “the
Copy

Florida Bar v. Padrino, 500 So. 2d 525 (Fla. 1987).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 12 Fla. L. Weekly 71, 1987 Fla. LEXIS 1397

Integration Rule of The Florida Bar, article XI, section 11.-02(4)(c) of the Integration Rule Bylaws, and Disciplinary
Copy

St. Joseph Hosp., Augusta, Georgia, Inc. v. Health Mgmt. Assocs., Inc., 705 F.3d 1289 (11th Cir. 2013).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2013 WL 258732, 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 1620

unenforceable under Georgia’s statute of frauds, O.C.G.A. § 11-2-201 (2012) and O.C.G.A. § 13-5-30 (2012).
Copy

St. Joseph Hosp., Augusta, Georgia, Inc. v. Health Mgmt. Assocs., Inc. (11th Cir. 2013).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

unenforceable under Georgia’s statute of frauds, O.C.G.A. § 11-2-201 (2012) and O.C.G.A. § 13-5-30 (2012).17 HMA’s
Copy

Corrigan v. Bank of Am., N.A., 189 So. 3d 187 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 1543, 2016 WL 455718

Myron C. Weinstein, 29 N.J. Prac., Law of Mortgages § 11.2 (2d ed. 2001) (”[T]o hold ... that when one in
Copy

Florida Bar, 328 So. 2d 196 (Fla. 1976).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1976 Fla. LEXIS 4404

27 adopted by the Supreme Court in 1955 and Section 11.02(3) (a) of the Integration Rule of The Florida
Copy

Robert Emerson v. Hillsborough Cnty., Florida, etc. & Stacy White v. Hillsborough Cnty., Florida, etc. (Fla. 2021).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida

the purpose set forth” in the amendment. Id. § 11.02. The surtax, which had an effective date of January
Copy

Kelvin Leon Jones v. Governor of Florida (11th Cir. 2020).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

the authorized sentence”); Tex. Elec. Code Ann. § 11.002(a)(4)(A) (permitting re- enfranchisement once
Copy

Hatcher v. Allied Prods. Corp., 782 F.2d 926 (11th Cir. 1986).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 22407

the contract and except as provided in Code Section 11-2-318. (b) (1) The manufacturer of any personal
Copy

Metro. Dade Cnty. v. Florida Processing Co., 229 So. 2d 254 (Fla. 1969).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1969 Fla. LEXIS 2542

(1954); 2 Davis, Administrative Law Treatise, § 11.02 (1958); Cooper, Administrative Agencies and the
Copy

City of Hialeah v. Pfaffendorf, 91 So. 2d 192 (Fla. 1956).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida

III of the Florida Constitution F.S.A. and Section 11.02, F.S. 1955, F.S.A., as to Chapter 30807, supra
Copy

Florida Bar v. Pierce, 498 So. 2d 431 (Fla. 1986).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 11 Fla. L. Weekly 642, 1986 Fla. LEXIS 2892

to the attorney; Rule 11.02(4)(c) and Bylaw Section 11.02(4)(c), paragraph 3(c) for failing to prepare
Copy

Hutchins v. Sct Trading, LLC, 8831 W. Hillsborough Ave, Inc. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2024).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

Florida, The Florida Bar Florida Appellate Practice § 11.2.C.1 (2022) (observing that "the requirement
Copy

Hunt v. Hawthorn Assocs., Inc. (11th Cir. 1997).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

participation in or their benefits under the Plan.” § 11.2 (“Authority [of Pension Dispute Board]”).
Copy

The Florida Bar v. Gentry, 475 So. 2d 678 (Fla. 1985).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 490

...Although respondent checked his July 1, 1983 dues statement indicating he had read the trust accounting rules and was familiar with their requirements, he was not maintaining the trust account in accordance with provisions of Fla. Bar Integr. Rule, art. XI, Rule 11.02(4)(c) and the corresponding Bylaw....
...Respondent did return the retainer subsequent to the grievance committee hearing on November 2, 1984. The referee recommends that respondent be found guilty of violating Disciplinary Rule 2-106(A) of the Code of Professional Responsibility as well as Rule 11.02(4) of the Integration Rule of The Florida Bar as to Count I; violating Rule 11.02(4)(c) of the Integration Rule of The Florida Bar and By-Law for Section 11.02(4)(c) effective until June 30, 1984 as to Count II; and violating Disciplinary Rules 1-102(A)(6) and 6-101(A)(3) of the Code of Professional Responsibility as to Count III....
Copy

Advanced BodyCare Solutions v. Thione Int'l., Inc. (11th Cir. 2010).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

lots to be separately accepted . . . .” O.C.G.A. § 11- 2-612(1). “Whenever nonconformity or default with
Copy

Banc One Leasing Corp. v. Everglades Mem'l Hosp., Inc. (In re Everglades Mem'l Hosp., Inc.), 346 B.R. 223 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 2006).

Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | 19 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 296, 2006 Bankr. LEXIS 1454

effective date of this act.” (Banc One Ex. 2 — Section 11(2)). Pursuant to the Act, the rights and powers
Copy

Sheraton Twin Towers v. Casas, 397 So. 2d 391 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19336

disability.” L. Alpert, Workmen’s Compensation Law, § 11-2 (3d ed. 1978). Alpert also notes that there is
Copy

Florida Bar v. Sharman, 504 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. 1987).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 12 Fla. L. Weekly 160, 1987 Fla. LEXIS 1708

account); Integration Rule 11.02(4)(b) and Bylaws Section 11.02(4)(c) 2.f (2.d before June 30, 1984) (client
Copy

Florida Bar v. Napier, 467 So. 2d 994 (Fla. 1985).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 233, 1985 Fla. LEXIS 3020

Rule 11.02(4) of the Integration Rule, Bylaws section 11.-02(4)(c) and Disciplinary Rules 6-101(A)(3), 7-102(A)(5)
Copy

The City of Cocoa Vs the Villas of Cocoa Vill., LLC, a Florida Ltd. Liab. Co. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

24 Fla. Prac., Fla. Municipal Law & Prac. § 11:2 (2021 ed.). A request for proposal is used
Copy

Miller v. Davis, 174 So. 2d 8 (Fla. 1965).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1965 Fla. LEXIS 3414

Florida 1961 constitutional in view of Article V, § 11(2) of the Constitution of the State of Florida? 3

This Florida statute resource is curated by Graham W. Syfert, Esq., a Jacksonville, Florida personal injury and workers' compensation attorney. For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.