The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title III
LEGISLATIVE BRANCH; COMMISSIONS

Chapter 11
LEGISLATIVE ORGANIZATION, PROCEDURES, AND STAFFING

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 11.02

11.02 Notice of special or local legislation or certain relief acts.—The notice required to obtain special or local legislation or any relief act specified in s. 11.065 shall be by publishing the identical notice as provided in chapter 50 or circulated throughout the county or counties where the matter or thing to be affected by such legislation shall be situated one time at least 30 days before introduction of the proposed law into the Legislature or, if the notice is not published on a publicly accessible website as provided in s. 50.0311 and there is no newspaper circulated throughout or published in the county, by posting for at least 30 days at not fewer than three public places in the county or each of the counties, one of which places shall be at the courthouse in the county or counties where the matter or thing to be affected by such legislation shall be situated. Notice of special or local legislation shall state the substance of the contemplated law, as required by s. 10, Art. III of the State Constitution. Notice of any relief act specified in s. 11.065 shall state the name of the claimant, the nature of the injury or loss for which the claim is made, and the amount of the claim against the affected municipality’s revenue-sharing trust fund.

History.—s. 1, ch. 3708, 1887; RS 66; GS 67; RGS 78; CGL 94; s. 1, ch. 13791, 1929; s. 2, ch. 69-52; s. 5, ch. 69-216; s. 1, ch. 78-302; s. 1, ch. 78-307; s. 2, ch. 96-318; s. 9, ch. 2021-17; s. 9, ch. 2022-103.

F.S. 11.02 on Google Scholar

F.S. 11.02 on Casetext

Amendments to 11.02

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 11.02

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 11.02.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

PEERLESS INSURANCE COMPANY, v. TECHNOLOGY INSURANCE COMPANY, INC., 392 F. Supp. 3d 313 (E.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . Further, Vintage's obligations as a tenant, outlined in Section 11.02 of the Lease, include maintaining . . . the parties dispute the scope of the maintenance obligations with respect to the sidewalk, as Section 11.02 . . .

IN RE REPUBLIC AIRWAYS HOLDINGS INC., 598 B.R. 118 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . these Amended Leases utilize SLV for "(a) insurance protection against Aircraft loss (see Leases, at 11.02 . . .

MARKHAM CONCEPTS, INC. v. HASBRO, INC. Co- S. Co- S. Co- S., 355 F. Supp. 3d 119 (D.R.I. 2019)

. . . circumstances, termination rights are not without various qualifications, Nimmer & Nimmer, supra, § 11.02 . . . See Nimmer & Nimmer, supra, § 11.02 ("[The 1976 Act] moves in categorical fashion, disallowing all works . . . Id.; see Nimmer & Nimmer, supra, § 11.02 ("Insofar as a work is made 'for hire' because it has been prepared . . .

MCGEE, v. A. BERRYHILL,, 354 F. Supp. 3d 304 (W.D.N.Y. 2018)

. . . P, Appendix 1, § 11.02 (Epilepsy - convulsive), 20 C.F.R. Pt. 404, Subpt. . . .

HORROR INC. v. MILLER,, 335 F. Supp. 3d 273 (D. Conn. 2018)

. . . (quoting 3 Nimmer on Copyright § 11.02[A][2] (2000 ed.) ). . . .

CITY OF NEW YORK, v. TAVERN ON THE GREEN INTERNATIONAL LLC,, 351 F. Supp. 3d 680 (S.D.N.Y. 2018)

. . . dealing throughout the parties' business relationship and that the City violated Sections 2.04(f) and 11.02 . . . Sections 2.04(f) and 11.02 of the Use Agreement - among other provisions - govern the parties' respective . . . Section 11.02 supplements the City's duty not to oppose the registration of a "Concurrent User's Mark . . . under Section 11.02 are triggered by the refusal of a trademark registration based on the existence . . . Thus, TOGI's theory that the City breached Sections 2.04(f) and 11.02 of the Use Agreement is not viable . . .

FARLEY, v. COLVIN,, 231 F. Supp. 3d 335 (N.D. Cal. 2017)

. . . At the time of the ALJ’s decision, epilepsy was listed only at 11.02 and 11.03, and noncon-vulsive epilepsy . . . The current list of impairments has a single, consolidated epilepsy listing at 11.02. . . . .

EMJ CORPORATION v. HUDSON SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY,, 833 F.3d 544 (5th Cir. 2016)

. . . Newman, Handbook on Insurance Coverage Disputes § 11.02(b), at 895 (14th ed. 2008). . . . aggregate limit of all other valid and collectible insurance.” 1 Ostrager & Newman, supra note 1, § 11.02 . . .

BETTERMAN, v. MONTANA., 136 S. Ct. 1609 (U.S. 2016)

. . . Proc. 11.02(1) (2016); La. Code Crim. Proc. Ann., Art. 874 (West 2016) ; Me. Rule Crim. . . .

IN RE WYLY,, 552 B.R. 338 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. 2016)

. . . X (Agreement of Limited Partnership of Stargate Sport Horses, L.P.) at § 11.02 (Method of Liquidation . . .

CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS v. P. BECKER, J. L. F. R. Jr. R. W. Jr. R. M. Jr. Jr. J. Jr. C. Jr. J. III, L. A. Jr. C. Jr. L. Jr. A. Sr., 371 F. Supp. 3d 1218 (N.D. Ga. 2016)

. . . Evidence $631.87 $631.87 2004 $0.00 $73.44 $342.41 $415.85 2005 $140.45 $302.94 $266.22 $709.61 2006 $11.02 . . .

FAULKNER, v. UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI,, 173 F. Supp. 3d 575 (S.D. Ohio 2016)

. . . Challenges to the University’s policies: The University’s Discriminatory Harassment Policy (No. 11.02 . . .

RANSOME, v. W. COLVIN,, 164 F. Supp. 3d 427 (W.D.N.Y. 2016)

. . . reference to Listing 11.18, which in turn states that cerebral trauma is to be evaluated under Listings 11.02 . . .

DILWORTH o b o A. v. W. COLVIN,, 158 F. Supp. 3d 238 (D. Del. 2016)

. . . (Tr. 17-18) Claimant’s seizures did not meet the criteria of either listing 11.02 or listing 11.03, because . . . The ALJ’s decision states that claimant’s seizures did not meet the criteria of listing 11.02 because . . . Part 404, Subpart P, Appendix 1, § 11.02. . . .

IN RE HARDEMAN COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT d b a, 540 B.R. 229 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. 2015)

. . . The discharge provision set forth in § 11.01, the injunctive provisions set forth in § 11.02, and the . . .

GORDON, v. TBC RETAIL GROUP, INC. d b a, 134 F. Supp. 3d 1027 (D.S.C. 2015)

. . . Turned Hours Pay plus “differential pay” — equal to $11.02 per hour for all actual hours worked during . . . percentage of their actual hours, TBC compensates the mechanic as if they earned a straightforward wage of $11.02 . . . As a matter of caution, TBC set a minimum rate of $11.02 per hour, though one and one-half times the . . .

IN RE SCARBOROUGH- ST. JAMES CORPORATION,, 535 B.R. 60 (Bankr. D. Del. 2015)

. . . response to the March 20 letter and wrote: “[a]c-cordingly, pursuant to the Lease, including Section 11.02 . . .

J. SCHOLTISEK, v. W. COLVIN,, 110 F. Supp. 3d 464 (W.D.N.Y. 2015)

. . . Specifically, the ALJ considered Listings 1.04, 11.02, and 11.03. (Id.). 4. . . .

PARSONS, v. W. COLVIN,, 111 F. Supp. 3d 1009 (D. Ariz. 2015)

. . . Plaintiff next argues that the ALJ erred in failing to consider whether his impairments equaled Listing 11.02 . . . Listing 11.02 is the listing for convulsive epilepsy, (grand mal or psychomotor), documented by detailed . . . counsel presented no argument at the hearing that plaintiffs impairments medically equaled Listing 11.02 . . . And, plaintiff offered evidence to support a plausible theory that his impairments equaled Listing 11.02 . . . It was error not to consider whether plaintiffs impairments equaled Listing 11.02. . . .

FIGVED, v. W. COLVIN,, 103 F. Supp. 3d 954 (N.D. Ill. 2015)

. . . did not meet listings 1.04 covering disorders of the spine, 3.20 covering pulmonary insufficiency, or 11.02 . . .

BELLEW, v. ACTING COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,, 605 F. App'x 917 (11th Cir. 2015)

. . . P, App. 1, §§ 11.02-11.03. . . . Id. § 11.02. . . . Id. § 11.02(A)-(B). . . . P, App. 1, § 11.02. Rather, Dr. Arthur M. . . . P, App. 1, §§ 11.00(A), 11.02, 11.03. On numerous occasions, testing revealed that Mr. . . .

IN RE RAVENNA METROPOLITAN DISTRICT,, 522 B.R. 656 (Bankr. D. Colo. 2014)

. . . Section 11.02 is captioned, “Moral Obligation Subject to Annual Appropriations; Not a Multiple-Fiscal . . . Ex. 11, at § 11.02. . . . Without the caption, §§ 11.01 and 11.02 of the Lease read as though they were imposing a conditional . . .

SILVERS, v. W. COLVIN,, 67 F. Supp. 3d 570 (W.D.N.Y. 2014)

. . . three, the ALJ found that plaintiffs seizure disorder did not meet or equal the criteria of Listings 11.02 . . .

In DINGLEY, LLC LLC, v., 514 B.R. 591 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 2014)

. . . Relying on old district court decisions and 1A Collier ¶ 11.02 at 1147-48, the Ninth Circuit noted that . . .

KLAYMAN, v. JUDICIAL WATCH, INC., 22 F. Supp. 3d 1240 (S.D. Fla. 2014)

. . . Belli 389 F.2d at 585 n. 11 (measuring the defamatory statement “in part by reference to [former] Rule 11.02 . . .

UNITED STATES v. HANSMEIER,, 38 F. Supp. 3d 950 (C.D. Ill. 2014)

. . . R. 11.02 (a transferred judge has the same powers and responsibilities as a judge of the court to which . . .

GILKERSON, v. CHASEWOOD BANK,, 1 F. Supp. 3d 570 (S.D. Tex. 2014)

. . . Act art. 11.02(B) on January 1, 2010, the secretary of state may forfeit a charter upon receiving certification . . .

GE XIONG, v. W. COLVIN,, 995 F. Supp. 2d 958 (D. Minn. 2014)

. . . Listings 11.02 and 11.03 require all of the following medical findings in order for a claimant to be . . .

UNITED STATES v. CAMPBELL,, 741 F.3d 251 (1st Cir. 2013)

. . . Rudstein et al., Criminal Constitutional Law § 11.02(2)(b)(iii)(B) (2013) ("[A] passenger in a vehicle . . .

LIPPINCOTT, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,, 982 F. Supp. 2d 358 (D.N.J. 2013)

. . . Listing 11.00 provides the criteria for neurological disorders, including convulsive epilepsy (11.02) . . .

COHEN, a v. AMERICAN SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY, FSB f k a FSB,, 735 F.3d 601 (7th Cir. 2013)

. . . Shapo, Regulation of Rates and Risk Classification, in 2 New Appleman on Insurance § 11.02[4][3], 11- . . .

In GENTIVA SECURITIES LITIGATION, 971 F. Supp. 2d 305 (E.D.N.Y. 2013)

. . . Gentiva shares through the exercise or conversion of stock options at an average price of approximately $11.02 . . . Gentiva shares through the exercise or conversion of stock options at an average price of approximately $11.02 . . .

IN RE K- V DISCOVERY SOLUTIONS, INC. LLC, LLC, K- V v. K- V K- V, 496 B.R. 330 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2013)

. . . With respect to a distribution of KV’s assets in a bankruptcy reorganization, § 11.02 provides that “ . . . Indent. § 11.02.) . . .

In AFFINITY HEALTH CARE, MANAGEMENT, INC. LLC. LLC. v. M. D. a k a, 499 B.R. 246 (Bankr. D. Conn. 2013)

. . . Reorganization (hereinafter, the “Plan”) the Committee has been authorized, pursuant to sections 11.01, 11.02 . . .

FEDERAL TREASURY ENTERPRISE SOJUZPLODOIMPORT, OAO v. SPI SPIRITS LIMITED, SPI SA, B. V. USA, DBA USA, USA, B. V. N. V., 726 F.3d 62 (2d Cir. 2013)

. . . .”); 3-11 Gilson on Trademarks § 11.02(l)(b) (“Gilson”) (same). . . .

FEDERATED SERVICE INSURANCE COMPANY, a v. MARTINEZ,, 529 F. App'x 954 (10th Cir. 2013)

. . . well as "non-automobile risk” occurring at the "garage location.” 2-11 Law of Liability Insurance § 11.02 . . .

KOSTICK, P. S. J. v. T. NAGO, IV, Y. S. E., 960 F. Supp. 2d 1074 (D. Haw. 2013)

. . . district 15, Kauai basic island unit) contains 21,835 permanent residents, which is 2,705 fewer (or 11.02 . . . population of permanent residents that is 2,705 below the mathematically ideal size of 24,540 — or 11.02 . . .

CUTHRELL, v. J. ASTRUE,, 702 F.3d 1114 (8th Cir. 2013)

. . . The listing for cerebral trauma has one line: “Evaluate under the provisions of 11.02, 11.03,' 11.04, . . . Thus, cerebral trauma, or traumatic brain injury, can be either neurological (11.02, 11.03,11.04), mental . . .

WELLS FARGO BANK, N. A. v. CCC ATLANTIC, LLC,, 905 F. Supp. 2d 604 (D.N.J. 2012)

. . . First, Article 11.02(d) of the Loan Agreement specifically provides that after an “Event of Default”, . . .

BRODIE, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,, 492 F. App'x 817 (9th Cir. 2012)

. . . ALJ did not err in determining that Brodie’s syncope and seizures did not equal listed impairments 11.02 . . .

FARMER OIL AND GAS PROPERTIES, LLC, v. SOUTHERN UTE INDIAN TRIBE,, 899 F. Supp. 2d 1097 (D. Colo. 2012)

. . . Farmer explains that in section 11.02 of the PSA, the Tribe expressly agreed “to unequivocally submit . . . (quoting PSA at 12, § 11.02). . . . Second, Farmer’s quotation of section 11.02 of the PSA is conveniently incomplete. . . . PSA at 12, § 11.02 (emphases added). . . . This is an absurd result both theoretically and within the textual confines of section 11.02. . . .

In SECURITIES INVESTOR PROTECTION CORPORATION, v. BERNARD L. MADOFF INVESTMENT SECURITIES LLC, In L. H. L. LLC, v., 480 B.R. 501 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2012)

. . . relevant rules of the BLI; (2) [Fair-field Sentry] had a stable and steady annualized return rate of 11.02% . . .

CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY, v. MICHIGAN CATASTROPHIC CLAIMS ASSOCIATION,, 874 F. Supp. 2d 678 (E.D. Mich. 2012)

. . . Further, Section 11.02 of the Plan of Operation lists actions the MCCA may take when a member fails to . . . authorize the taking of such other action as it deems proper and appropriate .... ” Plan of Operation § 11.02 . . . MCCA Plan of Operation § 11.02. . . . Plan of Operation § 11.02. . . .

KOSTICK, P. S. J. v. T. NAGO, IV, Y. S. E., 878 F. Supp. 2d 1124 (D. Haw. 2012)

. . . (House District 15, Kauai basic island unit) contains 21,835 permanent residents which is 2,705 (or 11.02 . . . Kauai basic island unit) contains 21, 835 permanent residents which is -2,705 permanent residents or -11.02% . . .

In AMERICAN BUSINESS FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. L. v. LLC, N. A., 471 B.R. 354 (Bankr. D. Del. 2012)

. . . (App. 4 at § 11.02.) . . .

WILLIAMS, v. J. ASTRUE,, 861 F. Supp. 2d 688 (E.D.N.C. 2012)

. . . Williams met Listing § 11.02. . . . P, App. 1, § 11.02. Dr. William Deans’ reports document that Ms. . . . Williams now has the objective documentation to show that she meets Listing § 11.02. . . . Williams satisfies all of the requisite elements of Listing § 11.02. . . . Williams meets Listing § 11.02, the Court concludes that the Commissioner is obliged to find in favor . . .

P. DeFAZIO, v. HOLLISTER, INC., 854 F. Supp. 2d 770 (E.D. Cal. 2012)

. . . of the Plan, (id), the Trustees are responsible for management of the Plan’s assets, (id §§ 11.01, 11.02 . . .

WISCONSIN EDUCATION ASSOCIATION COUNCIL Of AFSCME, AFL- CIO AFSCME, AFL- CIO AFT- AFL- CIO AFSCME, AFL- CIO CTW, CLC AFL- CIO, v. WALKER, L. R. G., 824 F. Supp. 2d 856 (W.D. Wis. 2012)

. . . Code §§ ERC 11.02(3), 21.02. . . .

TATONE, v. SUNTRUST MORTGAGE, INC. LLC,, 857 F. Supp. 2d 821 (D. Minn. 2012)

. . . P. 11.02 (emphasis added). . . .

BRAMLETT, v. MEDICAL PROTECTIVE COMPANY OF FORT WAYNE, INDIANA,, 855 F. Supp. 2d 615 (N.D. Tex. 2012)

. . . Although Phillips II construed § 11.02(c) of the now-repealed Medical Liability and Insurance Improvement . . . extent, plaintiffs can bring a direct Stowers-type claim against their physician’s insurer under § 11.02 . . . The court of appeals reached this conclusion based on § 11.02(c) of the MLIIA, which provided that § . . . Ann. art. 4590i, § 11.02(a). . . . Id. § 11.02(c). . . .

UNITED STATES v. RIVERA,, 444 F. App'x 774 (5th Cir. 2011)

. . . Probation Office calculated Rivera’s base offense level as 38 because the offense involved a net weight of 11.02 . . .

CIH INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS, LLC, v. BT UNITED STATES, LLC,, 821 F. Supp. 2d 604 (S.D.N.Y. 2011)

. . . Plaintiff counters that the “actual prejudice” language of § 11.02(a) only applies to the initial notice . . . Notice as a Condition Precedent BT argues that the notice obligation set forth in section 11.02(a) of . . . (Merger Agreement § 11.02(a).) . . . (a)); (2) “consult with” and "keep [CIH] informed” regarding any such tax claim, {Id. § 11.02(a)); (3 . . . (Merger Agreement, § 11.02(a).) . CIH cites American Ins. Co. v. . . .

STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, v. A. GARCIA, Jr. A. Jr. A., 99 So. 3d 539 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . relief shall be submitted to the Legislature in the future. (3)Notice shall be given as provided in s. 11.02 . . .

TATTOO ART, INC. A v. TAT INTERNATIONAL, LLC, A A., 794 F. Supp. 2d 634 (E.D. Va. 2011)

. . . . ¶ 11.02. 25. . . . 227:2-228:12 (Wolfe Test.). • The testimony at trial further established that TAT breached paragraph 11.02 . . . A ¶ 11.02; Trial Tr. vol. 1, at 173:14-174:4 (Knapp Test.), 183:7-17 (Kelly Knapp Dep. . . .

KLIBER, v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,, 794 F. Supp. 2d 1025 (D. Minn. 2011)

. . . B.Whether Plaintiff Met or Equaled Listing 11.02 The Listing of Impairments in the regulations describes . . . Listing 11.02 is met or equaled under the following provisions: Epilepsy-convulsive epilepsy, (grand . . . Section 11.00 of Appendix 1 provides further information about evaluation of Listings 11.02 and 11.03 . . . Under 11.02 and 11.03, the criteria can be applied only if the impairment persists despite the fact that . . . When seizures are occurring at the frequency stated in 11.02 or 11.03, evaluation of the severity of . . .

KNOWLTON, v. SHAW,, 791 F. Supp. 2d 220 (D. Me. 2011)

. . . Gregory, Maine Tort Law § 11.02-11.08 (2004 ed.) (Maine Tort Law). . . . Maine Tort Law § 11.02-11.03. . . .

L. THOMPSON, v. J. ASTRUE,, 764 F. Supp. 2d 1132 (D. Minn. 2011)

. . . not properly develop the record; (2) the ALJ did not find that Plaintiffs impairments met Listings 11.02 . . .

K. PERSCHKA, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,, 411 F. App'x 781 (6th Cir. 2010)

. . . Social Security Disability Evaluation Listing 11.02 provides the requirements for showing a “convulsive . . . She contends that she met the Listing 11.02 requirements for convulsive epilepsy, and that the ALJ erred . . . is substantial medical evidence supporting the ALJ’s conclusion that Perschka did not meet Listing 11.02 . . . This is not consistent with convulsive epilepsy in Listing 11.02, which requires documentation of generalized . . . establish that Perschka experienced convulsive grand mal seizures with the frequency required in Listing 11.02 . . .

HCP LAGUNA CREEK CA, LP, HCP MA, LP, HCP MD, LP, HCP CA, LP, HRA HCP, v. SUNRISE SENIOR LIVING MANAGEMENT, INC., 737 F. Supp. 2d 533 (E.D. Va. 2010)

. . . Agmt. §§ 11.02(a), (b) & (e).) . . . Agmt. § 11.02(d).) . . . When read in light of § 11.02(c)’s reference to “total aggregate amount,” § 11.02(d)’s furniture, fixtures . . . Agmt. § 11.02(c).) . . . Agmt. § 11.02(d).) . . .

TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY v. DORMITORY AUTHORITY- STATE OF NEW YORK, TDX P. C. TDX v. v. a k a t a d b a PA. U. S. f k a d b a d b a a k a XYZ P. C. v. P. C. P. C. P. C. LBL U. S. A., 735 F. Supp. 2d 42 (S.D.N.Y. 2010)

. . . In accordance with General Conditions § 11.02 (the no-damages-for-delay clause), however, Change Order . . . Section 11.02 of the General Conditions, entitled “Claims for Delay,” provides: No claims for increased . . . General Conditions § 11.02 is, like most no-damages-for-delay clauses, a broadly worded provision. . . . another lawsuit arising out of this Project, the Appellate Division held that General Conditions § 11.02 . . . September 1, 2001— also affirmed that it was "being issued pursuant to Article 11 Disputes, Section 11.02 . . .

FIFTH THIRD BANK, v. McCLURE PROPERTIES, INC., 724 F. Supp. 2d 598 (W.D. Va. 2010)

. . . However, section 11.02(c) of the May 2006 loan contract between Fifth Third and McClure Properties also . . .

TELEBRANDS CORP. v. DEL LABORATORIES, INC. U. S., 719 F. Supp. 2d 283 (S.D.N.Y. 2010)

. . . (E.D.Va.1988), aff'd, 894 F.2d 92 (4th Cir.1990); see also Jerome Gilson, 3 Gilson on Trademarks § 11.02 . . .

In SPANSION, INC. U. S. v. LLC, LLC, LLC, 426 B.R. 114 (Bankr. D. Del. 2010)

. . . Section 11.02 of the Subordinated Indenture sets forth certain rules that govern if the Issuer (here, . . . (Subordinated Indenture, § 11.02(2).) . . .

FARID, v. Dr. I. ELLEN, S. L. P. Dr. NYS, 593 F.3d 233 (2d Cir. 2010)

. . . Section 11.02 of the by-laws states that “[a] member determined to have violated a provision of the Constitution . . .

WILLIAM A. GROSS CONSTRUCTION ASSOCIATES, INC. v. AMERICAN MANUFACTURERS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY,, 262 F.R.D. 354 (S.D.N.Y. 2009)

. . . Section 11.02 of the General Conditions deals with delay claims, as follows: No claims for increased . . . (General Conditions § 11.02.) . . .

v., 133 T.C. 136 (T.C. 2009)

. . . Monthly and average WAM 123456789 10 11 12 Avg. 1995 11.02 11.05 10.28 12.45 11.54 11.98 11.82 12.47 . . .

BIG DIPPER ENTERTAINMENT, LLC. v. CITY OF WARREN,, 658 F. Supp. 2d 831 (E.D. Mich. 2009)

. . . The Locational Restrictions Of Section 11.02(C) Prohibiting SOBs From Locating In Either “The Downtown . . .

ARCHITETTURA, INC. v. DBSI CUMBERLAND AT GRANBURY LP,, 652 F. Supp. 2d 775 (N.D. Tex. 2009)

. . . See 3-11 Nimmer on Copyright § 11.02. . . . . See also 3-11 Nimmer on Copyright § 11.02 n. 2 ("Non-exclusive grants were included in the right [of . . . Warner/Chappell Music, Inc., 155 F.3d 17, 22 (2d Cir.1998). . 3-11 Nimmer on Copyright § 11.02 n. 65. . . .

SIEGEL v. WARNER BROS. ENTERTAINMENT INC. DC, 658 F. Supp. 2d 1036 (C.D. Cal. 2009)

. . . The section thus does not cover works that were unpublished” on that date); 3 Nimmer on Copyright § 11.02 . . .

R. THOMPSON, v. UNITED STATES, 87 Fed. Cl. 728 (Fed. Cl. 2009)

. . . BROM-BERG § 11.02(b). By the 1970s, a majority of the states had adopted the ULPA. . . . Id. § 11.02(c). Further amendments followed in 1985. Id. § 11.02(c) n. 41, (d). . . .

D. v., 132 T.C. 368 (T.C. 2009)

. . . See 3 Bromberg & Ribstein, supra sec. 11.02(c). . . . partner who takes part in control loses limited liability. 3 Bromberg & Ribstein, Partnership, sec. 11.02 . . . See id. sec. 11.02(c) and (d). In Iowa, an L.L.P. is formed under the Iowa Uniform Partnership Act. . . .

P. DeFAZIO, v. HOLLISTER, INC., 636 F. Supp. 2d 1045 (E.D. Cal. 2009)

. . . . §§ 11.01, 11.02), and the Hollister Board has the authority to appoint and remove trustees, (id. §§ . . .

SMITH, v. COLUMBIA GAS OF OHIO GROUP MEDICAL BENEFIT PLAN,, 624 F. Supp. 2d 844 (S.D. Ohio 2009)

. . . which a leave of absence begins, except to the extent continuation coverage is required under Section 11.02 . . .

ZOLDAN, v. ZOHLMAN Co-, 11 So. 3d 982 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . The beneficiaries will then be entitled to the rights of an assignee as i[s] provided in Paragraph 11.02 . . . partner “shall have no effect on the life of the Partnership, which shall continue,” and paragraph 11.02 . . . their interests by obtaining a bona fide offer from a willing buyer in the marketplace: Permitted Sales 11.02 . . .

In FIRST MAGNUS FINANCIAL CORPORATION,, 415 B.R. 416 (Bankr. D. Ariz. 2009)

. . . TAX CODE § 11.02. . . .

PARKS, v. J. ASTRUE,, 304 F. App'x 503 (9th Cir. 2008)

. . . P, App. 1, §§ 11.02 and 11.03 (Listings 11.02 and 11.03). . . . records indicate that while on anticonvulsants, she reported experiencing fewer seizures than Listings 11.02 . . .

CLASSIC MEDIA, INC. v. MEWBORN, v., 532 F.3d 978 (9th Cir. 2008)

. . . . §§ 203, 304(c)-(d); 3 Nimmer §§ 11.02[A], pp. 11-10 to 11-16; 11.02[B][1], p. 11-17. . A.A. . . .

SIEGEL v. WARNER BROS. ENTERTAINMENT INC. DC, 542 F. Supp. 2d 1098 (C.D. Cal. 2008)

. . . termination the grant of those rights arising under foreign copyright laws. 3 Nimmer on CopyRight § 11.02 . . . See 3 Nimmer on Copyright § 11.02[B][1] at 11-17 (“Only such rights as were originally the subject of . . .

BANK OF NEW YORK, v. FIRST MILLENNIUM, INC. L. P. RMK, 544 F. Supp. 2d 253 (S.D.N.Y. 2008)

. . . However, the FDIC contends that the Noteholders must surrender their Notes pursuant to § 11.02 of the . . . Ex. 2, § 11.02 (emphasis added). . . . But I conclude that such an application of § 11.02 is unwarranted under the present circumstances because . . . The aggressive application of § 11.02 urged by the FDIC does not reflect the underlying purpose of the . . . This approach will adequately protect the interests reflected in § 11.02 of the Master Indenture without . . .

In AMERICAN BUSINESS FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. L. v. LLC, N. A. LP, W., 384 B.R. 80 (Bankr. D. Del. 2008)

. . . (DIP Loan Agreement § 11.02.) . . .

P. ANTHONY, v. J. ASTRUE,, 266 F. App'x 451 (6th Cir. 2008)

. . . Anthony also contends that the ALJ should have found that his seizure disorder qualifies under Listings 11.02 . . . waived, the ALJ’s determination that Anthony’s seizure disorder does not meet the criteria of Listings 11.02 . . .

BRODIE, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,, 267 F. App'x 662 (9th Cir. 2008)

. . . conditions, viewed in combination, could not be analyzed to determine whether they met or equaled Listings 11.02 . . .

CARBERRY, v. TEXTRON PENSION PLAN,, 543 F. Supp. 2d 729 (E.D. Mich. 2008)

. . . (Plan Section 11.02(a)). 4. . . . (Plan Section 11.02(a)). 23. . . . Pursuant to Section 11.02 of the Plan document, Textron Inc. is the Plan Administrator and is solely . . . Textron Pension Plan, Section 11.02(a). . . . Plan Section 11.02(c) establishes administrative requirements and time limitations for the handling of . . .

COLLINS, v. Jo B. BARNHART,, 533 F. Supp. 2d 809 (N.D. Ill. 2008)

. . . P., App. 1, § 11.02; (2) by failing to explain his RFC assessment in accordance with SSR 96-8p; (3) by . . . Claimant raises issue with the ALJ’s epilepsy analysis under Listing 11.02. . . . P., App. 1, § 11.02. . . . Instead, the ALJ simply concluded in a cursory fashion that claimant did not meet Listing 11.02. . . . However, we find that the analysis is equally applicable under Listing 11.02. . . . .

D. PENNONI, v. UNITED STATES,, 79 Fed. Cl. 552 (Fed. Cl. 2007)

. . . Saltzman, IRS Practice and Procedure ¶ 11.02, 11-8 (“an overpayment is a payment in excess of what properly . . .

UNITED STATES v. STOLT- NIELSEN S. A., 524 F. Supp. 2d 586 (E.D. Pa. 2007)

. . . certifications representing as follows: 1.I have received, read and am familiar with the revised edition (Mar. 11.02 . . .

UNITED STATES v. STOLT- NIELSEN S. A., 524 F. Supp. 2d 609 (E.D. Pa. 2007)

. . . I have received, read and am familiar with the revised edition (Mar. 11.02) of the SNTG Antitrust Compliance . . .

J. BOLDEN, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,, 556 F. Supp. 2d 152 (E.D.N.Y. 2007)

. . . The elements of listing 11.02, or “convulsive epilepsy,” include (1) a “detailed description of a typical . . . P, app. 1 § 11.02. . . . Id. at § 11.02(A). . . . Because a finding of convulsive epilepsy under listing 11.02(A) can be made only when “the impairment . . . P, app. 1 § 11.02. . . .

ST. VINCENT S MEDICAL CENTER, INC. v. MEMORIAL HEALTHCARE GROUP, INC., 967 So. 2d 794 (Fla. 2007)

. . . Section 11.02, Florida Statutes (2004), provides the notice requirements for special laws: The notice . . . Ill of the State Constitution. § 11.02, Fla. Stat. (2004). . . . .

FARID, v. Dr. I. ELLEN, S. NYS s h a L. a P. Dr. NYS, 514 F. Supp. 2d 482 (S.D.N.Y. 2007)

. . . Section 11.02 of the by-laws provides that “[a] member determined to have violated a provision of the . . .

SIEGEL v. TIME WARNER INC. D. C., 496 F. Supp. 2d 1111 (C.D. Cal. 2007)

. . . See 3 Nimmer § 11.02[A][1] at 11-12 (“the termination provisions of Section 304(c) apply only if the . . .

UNITED STATES, v. R. WILLIAMSON, Jr., 65 M.J. 706 (A. Ct. Crim. App. 2007)

. . . Davis, 2 Federal Standards of Review § 11.02 (2d ed.1992) (evidentiary rulings reviewed for abuse of . . .

L. WISNER, v. J. ASTRUE,, 496 F. Supp. 2d 1299 (N.D. Ala. 2007)

. . . plaintiff had failed to show that he “has epilepsy or major motor seizures documented by EEG” under § 11.02 . . .

MAPLES, v. AMERICAN GREETINGS CORPORATION,, 504 F. Supp. 2d 443 (E.D. Ark. 2007)

. . . in the general factory position on June 23, 2005, at a rate of somewhere in the range of $10.64 to $11.02 . . .

ROBINSON H. v. WRIGHT, 460 F. Supp. 2d 178 (D. Me. 2006)

. . . Gregory, Maine Tort Law § 11.02 (2004 Ed.) . . .

F. TUCKER, v. Jo B. BARNHART,, 201 F. App'x 617 (10th Cir. 2006)

. . . Tucker’s impairments were severe enough to meet or equal Listings 11.02, 11.03, 12.02, or 12.04. . . . See 20 C.F.R., part 404, subpart P, app. 1, §§ 11.02, 11.03, 12.02, 12.04. . . . argument that the ALJ erred in determining that her seizures did not satisfy the criteria for Listings 11.02 . . .

In MOTORCYCLE EXCELLENCE GROUP, INC. v. BMW LLC,, 365 B.R. 370 (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. 2006)

. . . becoming insolvent or unable to pay its debts and being subject to execution of judicial process (Section 11.02 . . .

BRACE, v. UNITED STATES,, 72 Fed. Cl. 337 (Fed. Cl. 2006)

. . . Debiere, 241 Pa.Super. 1, 359 A.2d 398, 399 (1976); Ladner, supra, § 11.02(a). . . .

MENDOZA, v. Jo B. BARNHART,, 436 F. Supp. 2d 1110 (C.D. Cal. 2006)

. . . an onset date of May 1, 1988, based on a major seizure disorder meeting the requirements of Listing 11.02 . . . Listing 11.02 provides: Epilepsy — convulsive epilepsy, (grand mal or psychomotor), documented by detailed . . .

ARCE, v. Jo B. BARNHART,, 185 F. App'x 437 (5th Cir. 2006)

. . . She argues that her epilepsy meets listing 11.02, which requires that the claimant suffer from seizures . . . P, app. 1, § 11.02. . . . support the ALJ’s conclusion that Arce did not suffer monthly seizures and therefore did not meet listing 11.02 . . .