Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.703 - SENTENCING GUIDELINES (1994 AS AMENDED) | Syfert Law

Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448

Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.703

RULE 3.703. SENTENCING GUIDELINES (1994 AS AMENDED)

(a) Use. This rule is to be used in conjunction with the forms
located at rule 3.991. This rule implements the 1994 sentencing
guidelines, as amended, in strict accordance with chapter 921,
Florida Statutes. This rule applies to offenses committed on or after
October 1, 1995, or as otherwise indicated.

(b) Purpose and Construction. The purpose of the 1994
sentencing guidelines and the principles they embody are set out in
subsection 921.001(4). Existing caselaw construing the application
of sentencing guidelines that is in conflict with the provisions of this
rule or the statement of purpose or the principles embodied by the
1994 sentencing guidelines set out in subsection 921.001(4) is
superseded by the operation of this rule.

(c) Offense Severity Ranking.

(1) Felony offenses subject to the 1994 sentencing
guidelines, as amended, are listed in a single offense severity
ranking chart located at section 921.0012. The offense severity
ranking chart employs 10 offense levels, ranked from least severe to
most severe. Each felony offense is assigned to a level according to
the severity of the offense, commensurate with the harm or
potential for harm to the community that is caused by the offense.
The numerical statutory reference in the left column of the chart
and the felony degree designations in the middle column of the
chart determine whether felony offenses are specifically listed in the
offense severity ranking chart and the appropriate severity level.
The language in the right column is merely descriptive.

(2) Felony offenses not listed in section 921.0012 are to
be assigned a severity level in accordance with section 921.0013, as
follows:

(A) A felony of the third degree within offense level
1.

(B) A felony of the second degree within offense
level 4.
(C) A felony of the first degree within offense level
7.

(D) A felony of the first degree punishable by life
within offense level 9.

(E) A life felony within offense level 10.

An offense does not become unlisted and subject to the
provisions of section 921.0013, because of a reclassification of the
degree of felony pursuant to section 775.0845, section 775.087,
section 775.0875 or section 794.023.

(d) General Rules and Definitions.

(1) One or more sentencing guidelines scoresheets shall
be prepared for each offender covering all offenses pending before
the court for sentencing, including offenses for which the offender
has been adjudicated an habitual felony offender, an habitual
violent felony offender or violent career criminal. The office of the
state attorney or the Department of Corrections, or both where
appropriate, will prepare the scoresheets and present them to
defense counsel for review as to accuracy. The Department of
Corrections shall prepare sentencing guidelines scoresheets if the
offender is alleged to have violated probation or community control
and revocation is recommended.

(2) One scoresheet shall be prepared for all offenses
committed under any single version or revision of the guidelines,
pending before the court for sentencing.

(3) If an offender is before the court for sentencing for
more than one felony and the felonies were committed under more
than one version or revision of the guidelines, separate scoresheets
must be prepared and used at sentencing. The sentencing court
may impose such sentence concurrently or consecutively.

(4) The sentencing judge shall review the scoresheet for
accuracy and sign it.
(5) Felonies, except capital felonies, with continuing
dates of enterprise are to be sentenced under the guidelines in
effect on the beginning date of the criminal activity.

(6) “Conviction” means a determination of guilt
resulting from plea or trial, regardless of whether adjudication was
withheld or whether imposition of sentence was suspended.

(7) “Primary offense” is the offense pending for
sentencing that results in the highest number of total sentence
points. Only one offense may be scored as the primary offense.

(8) “Additional offense” is any offense, other than the
primary offense, pending before the court for sentencing. Sentence
points for additional offenses are determined by the severity level
and the number of offenses at a particular severity level.
Misdemeanors are scored at level “M” regardless of degree.

(9) “Victim injury” is scored for physical injury or death
suffered by a person as a direct result of any offense pending before
the court for sentencing. Except as otherwise provided by law, the
sexual penetration and sexual contact points will be scored as
follows. Sexual penetration points are scored if an offense pending
before the court for sentencing involves sexual penetration. Sexual
contact points are scored if an offense pending before the court for
sentencing involves sexual contact, but no penetration. If the victim
of an offense involving sexual penetration or sexual contact without
penetration suffers any physical injury as a direct result of an
offense pending before the court for sentencing, that physical injury
is to be scored in addition to any points scored for the sexual
contact or sexual penetration.

Victim injury shall be scored for each victim physically injured
and for each offense resulting in physical injury whether there are
one or more victims. However, victim injury shall not be scored for
an offense for which the offender has not been convicted.

Victim injury resultant from one or more capital felonies before
the court for sentencing is not to be included upon any scoresheet
prepared for non-capital felonies also pending before the court for
sentencing. This in no way prohibits the scoring of victim injury as
a result from the non-capital felonies before the court for
sentencing.

(10) Unless specifically provided otherwise by statute,
attempts, conspiracies, and solicitations are indicated in the space
provided on the guidelines scoresheet and are scored at one severity
level below the completed offense.

Attempts, solicitations, and conspiracies of third-degree
felonies located in offense severity levels 1 and 2 are to be scored as
misdemeanors. Attempts, solicitations, and conspiracies of third-
degree felonies located in offense severity levels 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,
and 10 are to be scored as felonies one offense level beneath the
incomplete or inchoate offense.

(11) An increase in offense severity level may result from
a reclassification of felony degrees pursuant to sections 775.0845,
775.087, 775.0875, or 794.023. Any such increase should be
indicated in the space provided on the sentencing guidelines
scoresheet.

(12) A single assessment of thirty prior serious felony
points is added if the offender has a primary offense or any
additional offense ranked in level 8, 9, or 10 and one or more prior
serious felonies. A “prior serious felony” is an offense in the
offender’s prior record ranked in level 8, 9, or 10 and for which the
offender is serving a sentence of confinement, supervision or other
sanction or for which the offender’s date of release from
confinement, supervision or other sanction, whichever is later is
within 3 years before the date the primary offense or any additional
offenses were committed. Out of state convictions wherein the
analogous or parallel Florida offenses are located in offense severity
level 8, 9, or 10 are to be considered prior serious felonies.

(13) If the offender has one or more prior capital felonies,
points shall be added to the subtotal sentence points of the offender
equal to twice the number of points the offender receives for the
primary offense and any additional offense. Out-of-state convictions
wherein the analogous or parallel Florida offenses are capital
offenses are to be considered capital offenses for purposes of
operation of this section.

(14) “Total offense score” is the sum of the sentence
points for primary offense, any additional offenses and victim
injury.

(15) “Prior record” refers to any conviction for an offense
committed by the offender prior to the commission of the primary
offense, excluding any additional offenses pending before the court
for sentencing. Prior record shall include convictions for offenses
committed by the offender as an adult or as a juvenile, convictions
by federal, out-of-state, military, or foreign courts and convictions
for violations of county or municipal ordinances that incorporate by
reference a penalty under state law. Federal, out-of-state, military,
or foreign convictions are scored at the severity level at which the
analogous or parallel Florida crime is located.

(A) Convictions for offenses committed more than
10 years prior to the date of the commission of the primary offense
are not scored as prior record if the offender has not been convicted
of any other crime for a period of 10 consecutive years from the
most recent date of release from confinement, supervision, or other
sanction, whichever is later, to the date of the commission of the
primary offense.

(B) Juvenile dispositions of offenses committed by
the offender within 3 years prior to the date of the commission of
the primary offense are scored as prior record if the offense would
have been a crime if committed by an adult. Juvenile dispositions of
sexual offenses committed by the offender more than 3 years prior
to the date of the primary offense are to be scored as prior record if
the offender has not maintained a conviction-free record, either as
an adult or as a juvenile, for a period of 3 consecutive years from
the most recent date of release from confinement, supervision, or
sanction, whichever is later, to the date of commission of the
primary offense.

(C) Entries in criminal histories that show no
disposition, disposition unknown, arrest only, or a disposition other
than conviction are not scored. Criminal history records expunged
or sealed under section 943.058 or other provisions of law,
including former sections 893.14 and 901.33, are scored as prior
record where the offender whose record has been expunged or
sealed is before the court for sentencing.

(D) Any uncertainty in the scoring of the offender’s
prior record shall be resolved in favor of the offender and
disagreement as to the propriety of scoring specific entries in the
prior record shall be resolved by the sentencing judge.

(E) When unable to determine whether the
conviction to be scored as prior record is a felony or a
misdemeanor, the conviction should be scored as a misdemeanor.
When the degree of felony is ambiguous or the severity level cannot
be deter-mined, the conviction should be scored at severity level 1.

(16) “Legal status points” are assessed when an offender:

(A) Escapes from incarceration;

(B) Flees to avoid prosecution;

(C) Fails to appear for a criminal proceeding;

(D) Violates any condition of a supersedeas bond;

(E) Is incarcerated;

(F) Is under any form of a pretrial intervention or
diversion program; or

(G) Is under any form of court-imposed or post-
prison release community supervision and commits an offense that
results in conviction. Legal status violations receive a score of 4
sentence points and are scored when the offense committed while
under legal status is before the court for sentencing. Points for a
legal status violation are to be assessed only once regardless of the
existence of more than one form of legal status at the time an
offense is committed or the number of offenses committed while
under any form of legal status.

(17) Community sanction violation points occur when
the offender is found to have violated a condition of:

(A) Probation;

(B) Community Control; or

(C) Pretrial Intervention or diversion.

Community sanction violation points are assessed when a
community sanction violation is before the court for sentencing. Six
community sanction violation points shall be assessed for each
violation or if the violation results from a new felony conviction, 12
community sanction violation points shall be assessed. Where there
are multiple violations, points may be assessed only for each
successive violation that follows a continuation of supervision, or
modification or revocation of the community sanction before the
court for sentencing and are not to be assessed for violation of
several conditions of a single community sanction. Multiple counts
of community sanction violations before the sentencing court shall
not be the basis for multiplying the assessment of community
sanction violation points.

(18) “Total prior record score” is the sum of all sentence
points for prior record.

(19) Possession of a firearm, semiautomatic firearm, or a
machine gun during the commission or attempt to commit a crime
will result in additional sentence points. Eighteen sentence points
are assessed if the offender is convicted of committing or attempting
to commit any felony other than those enumerated in subsection
775.087(2) while having in his or her possession a firearm as
defined in subsection 790.001(6). Twenty-five sentence points are
assessed if the offender is convicted of committing or attempting to
commit any felony other than those enumerated in subsection
775.087(3) while having in his or her possession a semiautomatic
firearm as defined in subsection 775.087(3) or a machine gun as
defined in subsection 790.001(9). Only one assessment of either 18
or 25 points shall apply.

(20) “Subtotal sentence points” are the sum of the total
offense score, the total prior record score, any legal status points,
community sanction points, prior serious felony points, prior capital
felony points or points for possession of a firearm or semi-automatic
weapon.

(21) If the primary offense is drug trafficking under
section 893.135 ranked in offense severity level 7 or 8, the subtotal
sentence points may be multiplied, at the discretion of the
sentencing court, by a factor of 1.5.

(22) If the primary offense is a violation of the Law
Enforcement Protection Act under subsection 775.0823(2), the
subtotal sentence points are multiplied by a factor of 2.5. If the
primary offense is a violation of subsection 775.0823(3), (4), (5), (6),
(7), or (8) the subtotal sentence points are multiplied by a factor of
2.0. If the primary offense is a violation of the Law Enforcement
Protection Act under subsection 775.0823(9) or (10) or section
784.07(3) or section 775.0875(1), the subtotal sentence points are
multiplied by a factor of 1.5.

(23) If the primary offense is grand theft of the third
degree of a motor vehicle and the offender’s prior record includes
three or more grand thefts of the third degree of a motor vehicle, the
subtotal sentence points are multiplied by 1.5.

(24) If the offender is found to be a member of a criminal
street gang pursuant to section 874.04, at the time of the
commission of the primary offense, the subtotal sentence points are
multiplied by 1.5.

(25) If the primary offense is determined to be a crime of
domestic violence as defined in section 741.28 and to have been
committed in the presence of a child who is related by blood or
marriage to the victim or perpetrator and who is under the age of
16, the subtotal sentence points are multiplied, at the discretion of
the court, by 1.5.
(26) “Total sentence points” are the subtotal sentence
points or the enhanced subtotal sentence points.

(27) “Presumptive sentence” is determined by the total
sentence points. A person sentenced for a felony committed on or
after July 1, 1997, who has at least one prior felony conviction and
whose recommended sentence is any nonstate prison sanction may
be sentenced to community control or a term of incarceration not to
exceed 22 months. A person sentenced for a felony committed on or
after July 1, 1997, who has at least one prior felony conviction and
whose minimum recommended sentence is less than 22 months in
state prison may be sentenced to a term of incarceration not to
exceed 22 months.

In all other cases, if the total sentence points are less than or
equal to 40, the recommended sentence, absent a departure, shall
not be state prison. The court may impose any nonstate prison
sanction authorized by law, including community control. However,
the sentencing court may increase sentence points less than or
equal to 40 by up to and including 15% to arrive at total sentence
points in excess of 40. If the total sentence points are greater than
40 but less than or equal to 52, the decision to sentence the
defendant to state prison or a nonstate prison sanction is left to the
discretion of the sentencing court. If the total sentence points are
greater than 52, the sentence, absent a departure, must be to state
prison.

A state prison sentence is calculated by deducting 28 points
from the total sentence points where total sentence points exceed
40. The resulting number represents state prison months. State
prison months may be increased or decreased by up to and
including 25% at the discretion of the sentencing court. State
prison months may not be increased where the sentencing court
has exercised discretion to increase total sentence points under 40
points to achieve a state prison sentence. The sentence imposed
must be entered on the scoresheet.

If the total sentence points are equal to or greater than
363, the court may sentence the offender to life imprisonment.
(28) If the recommended sentence under the sentencing
guidelines exceeds the maximum sentence authorized for the
pending felony offenses, the guidelines sentence must be imposed,
absent a departure. Such downward departure must be equal to or
less than the maximum sentence authorized by section 775.082.

(29) For those offenses having a mandatory penalty, a
scoresheet should be completed and the guidelines presumptive
sentence calculated. If the presumptive sentence is less than the
mandatory penalty, the mandatory sentence takes precedence. If
the presumptive sentence exceeds the mandatory sentence, the
presumptive sentence should be imposed.

(30) Departure from the recommended guidelines
sentence provided by the total sentence points should be avoided
unless there are circumstances or factors that reasonably justify
aggravating or mitigating the sentence. A state prison sentence that
deviates from the recommended prison sentence by more than 25%,
a state prison sentence where the total sentence points are equal to
or less than 40, or a sentence other than state prison where the
total sentence points are greater than 52 must be accompanied by a
written statement delineating the reasons for departure.
Circumstances or factors that can be considered include, but are
not limited to, those listed in subsections 921.0016(3) and (4).
Reasons for departing from the recommended guidelines sentence
shall not include circumstances or factors relating to prior arrests
without conviction or charged offenses for which convictions have
not been obtained.

(A) If a sentencing judge imposes a sentence that
departs from the recommended guidelines sentence, the reasons for
departure shall be orally articulated at the time sentence is
imposed. Any departure sentence must be accompanied by a
written statement, signed by the sentencing judge, delineating the
reasons for departure. The written statement shall be filed in the
court file within 7 days after the date of sentencing. A written
transcription of orally stated reasons for departure articulated at
the time sentence was imposed is sufficient if it is signed by the
sentencing judge and filed in the court file within 7 days after the
date of sentencing. The sentencing judge may also list the written
reasons for departure in the space provided on the guidelines
scoresheet and shall sign the scoresheet.

(B) The written statement delineating the reasons
for departure shall be made a part of the record. The written
statement, if it is a separate document, must accompany the
guidelines scoresheet required to be provided to the Department of
Corrections pursuant to subsection 921.0014(5).

(31) The sentencing court shall impose or suspend
sentence for each separate count, as convicted. The total sentence
shall be within the guidelines sentence unless a departure is
ordered.

If a split sentence is imposed, the incarcerative portion of
the sentence must not deviate more than 25 percent from the
recommended guidelines prison sentence. The total sanction
(incarceration and community control or probation) shall not exceed
the term provided by general law or the guidelines recommended
sentence where the provisions of subsection 921.001(5) apply.

(32) Sentences imposed after revocation of probation or
community control must be in accordance with the guidelines.
Cumulative incarceration imposed after revocation of probation or
community control is subject to limitations imposed by the
guidelines. A violation of probation or community control may not
be the basis for a departure sentence.

Committee Notes

1996 Amendments.

(a) This portion was amended to show that the earliest
offense date to which this rule applies is October 1, 1995 and that
all subsequent changes are incorporated. It is intended that
Committee Notes will be used to indicate effective dates of changes.

(c) This amendment applies to offenses committed on or
after October 1, 1996.
(d)(9) The 1996 Legislature created two crimes for which sexual
penetration or sexual contact points are not scored. That exception
applies to offenses committed on or after October 1, 1996 pursuant
to section 872.06, Florida Statutes or section 944.35(3)(b)2, Florida
Statutes.

(d)(12) The amendment applies to offenses committed on or
after October 1, 1996.

(d)(13) The amendment applies on or after October 1, 1996.

(d)(17) This amendment, which applies on or after October
1, 1996, clarifies when points may be assessed for multiple
violations. It also incorporates legislative changes that indicate that
multiple assessments may not be made for multiple counts of
community sanction violations.

(d)(24) The amendment applies to crimes committed on or
after October 1, 1996.

1997 Amendments.

(d)(25) The amendment applies to crimes committed on or
after October 1, 1997.

Cases Citing Rule 3.703

Total Results: 112

Hughes v. State

901 So. 2d 837, 2005 WL 977019

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 28, 2005 | Docket: 1216663

Cited 42 times | Published

So.2d 858, 860 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998); see Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.703(d); White v. State, 714 So.2d 440, 442-44

Category: Criminal Procedure

White v. State

714 So. 2d 440, 1998 WL 309060

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 12, 1998 | Docket: 1513771

Cited 32 times | Published

he committed the crime. The plain language of rule 3.703(d)(19) limits its application to those instances

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Keirn

720 So. 2d 1085, 1998 WL 219729

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 6, 1998 | Docket: 308401

Cited 18 times | Published

1987); § 921.0011(2), Fla. Stat. (1995); Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.703(d)(6). Where there is no explicit definition

Category: Criminal Procedure

Espiet v. State

797 So. 2d 598, 2001 WL 957388

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 24, 2001 | Docket: 1359488

Cited 17 times | Published

additional points for possession of a firearm, rule 3.703(d)(1), is identical to rule 3.704(d)(17) implementing

Category: Criminal Procedure

Behl v. State

898 So. 2d 217, 2005 WL 596984

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 16, 2005 | Docket: 1732372

Cited 14 times | Published

See §§ 921.0001-0016, Fla. Stat. (1997); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.703. [5] Cases on collateral review are, of

Category: Criminal Procedure

Schaffer v. State

769 So. 2d 496, 2000 WL 1532830

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 18, 2000 | Docket: 1739108

Cited 14 times | Published

community control may not exceed 22 months. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.703(d)(27) (1997) ("A person sentenced for a

Category: Criminal Procedure

Pearson v. Moore

767 So. 2d 1235, 2000 WL 1140023

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 14, 2000 | Docket: 1661502

Cited 12 times | Published

resolved in favor of the defendant. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.703(d)(15)(D) and (E); generally Dautel v. State

Category: Criminal Procedure

Stav v. State

860 So. 2d 478, 2003 WL 22657871

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 12, 2003 | Docket: 83103

Cited 11 times | Published

beginning date of the criminal activity." Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.703(d)(5). Stav's organized scheme to defraud

Category: Criminal Procedure

Colon v. State

909 So. 2d 484, 2005 WL 2043007

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 26, 2005 | Docket: 1199187

Cited 10 times | Published

felonies Colon committed are not "prior" offenses. Rule 3.703(d)(15), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure,

Category: Criminal Procedure

Knarich v. State

866 So. 2d 165, 2004 WL 314515

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 20, 2004 | Docket: 1273790

Cited 10 times | Published

but as level one offenses. Id.; see also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.703(d)(15)(E) (stating that "[w]hen the degree

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Clay

780 So. 2d 269, 2001 WL 201816

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 2, 2001 | Docket: 1298402

Cited 9 times | Published

[1] In order to impose a departure sentence, rule 3.703(d)(30), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure,

Category: Criminal Procedure

Madrigal v. State

683 So. 2d 1093, 1996 WL 668423

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 20, 1996 | Docket: 1514982

Cited 9 times | Published

that use of this enhancement factor was error. Rule 3.703(d)(22), which provides for such enhancement for

Category: Criminal Procedure

Jupiter v. State

833 So. 2d 169, 2002 WL 31528583

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 15, 2002 | Docket: 1259185

Cited 7 times | Published

Rule of Criminal Procedure is rule 3.703(d)(9). Compare Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.703(a) ("This rule applies to offenses

Category: Criminal Procedure

Grantham v. State

735 So. 2d 525, 1999 WL 301271

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 14, 1999 | Docket: 1431482

Cited 7 times | Published

Florida Statutes (Supp.1996). See also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.703(d)(19). Because trafficking in methamphetamine

Category: Criminal Procedure

Gamble v. State

723 So. 2d 905, 1999 WL 4950

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 8, 1999 | Docket: 1319787

Cited 7 times | Published

Stat. (1995). Second, effective October 1, 1996, rule 3.703(c)(2) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Dodson v. State

710 So. 2d 159, 1998 WL 187456

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 22, 1998 | Docket: 1731630

Cited 7 times | Published

he committed the crime. The plain language of rule 3.703(d)(19) limits its application to those instances

Category: Criminal Procedure

Moses v. State

13 So. 3d 490, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 6042, 2009 WL 1456732

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 27, 2009 | Docket: 1188418

Cited 6 times | Published

sentencing guidelines, statutes, and respective rules. Rule 3.703 was adopted to incorporate the 1994 sentencing

Category: Criminal Procedure

Philippe v. State

795 So. 2d 173, 2001 WL 1009321

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 5, 2001 | Docket: 1253278

Cited 6 times | Published

See § 921.0021(7)(a), Fla. Stat.(2000); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.703(d)(9); see also Appellee's Appendix I. There

Category: Criminal Procedure

Nunez v. State

721 So. 2d 346, 1998 WL 736344

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 23, 1998 | Docket: 1694479

Cited 6 times | Published

limitations provided by s. *350 775.082."); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.703(d)(26) ("[s]uch downward departure must

Category: Criminal Procedure

Adekunle v. State

916 So. 2d 950, 2005 WL 3299767

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 7, 2005 | Docket: 1187372

Cited 5 times | Published

for a community sanction violation. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.703(d)(17). The 1997 cases should have been

Category: Criminal Procedure

Jones v. State

901 So. 2d 255, 2005 WL 957067

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 27, 2005 | Docket: 1216650

Cited 5 times | Published

for a legal status violation, Jones relies on Rule 3.703(16)(G), now Rule 3.704(d)(15)(G), and Kelly v

Category: Criminal Procedure

Fortner v. State

830 So. 2d 174, 2002 WL 31268383

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 11, 2002 | Docket: 1516823

Cited 5 times | Published

resolved in favor of the defendant. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.703(d)(15)(D); Holybrice v. State, 753 So.2d

Category: Criminal Procedure

Holybrice v. State

753 So. 2d 621, 2000 WL 201440

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 23, 2000 | Docket: 1433214

Cited 5 times | Published

which were committed in March and April of 1998. Rule 3.703(d)(15) provides in part: (D) Any uncertainty

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Rife

733 So. 2d 541, 1999 WL 148030

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 28, 1999 | Docket: 1188179

Cited 5 times | Published

listed in subsections (3) and (4)." See also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.703(30). In the instant case, the circumstances

Category: Criminal Procedure

Dillard v. State

728 So. 2d 725, 1999 WL 68513

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 11, 1999 | Docket: 1673883

Cited 5 times | Published

sentence concurrently or consecutively. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.703(d). In the present case, the trial court

Category: Criminal Procedure

Annunziata v. State

697 So. 2d 997, 1997 WL 446924

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 8, 1997 | Docket: 1776641

Cited 5 times | Published

offense that results in conviction.... Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.703(d)(16) (1996). Annunziata argues that none

Category: Criminal Procedure

Mays v. State

693 So. 2d 52, 1997 WL 125895

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 21, 1997 | Docket: 2149657

Cited 5 times | Published

maximum sentence authorized by section 775.082. Rule 3.703(d)(26), Fla.R.Crim.Pro. Mays contends, however

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ray v. State

68 So. 3d 346, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 13233, 2011 WL 3667883

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 23, 2011 | Docket: 60302253

Cited 4 times | Published

aggravated child abuse — a non-capital felony. Under Rule 3.703(d)(9), this was error and those points should

Category: Criminal Procedure

Matthews v. State

774 So. 2d 1, 2000 WL 627653

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 17, 2000 | Docket: 1330694

Cited 4 times | Published

Criminal Procedure 3.703(d)(14), the predecessor to rule 3.703(d)(22). At that time, the rule referred to only

Category: Criminal Procedure

Greene v. State

714 So. 2d 554, 1998 WL 336337

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 26, 1998 | Docket: 461541

Cited 4 times | Published

Sentencing Guidelines, 660 So.2d 1374 (Fla.1995). Rule 3.703(10), which applies in Mr. Greene's case, provides

Category: Criminal Procedure

Sanders v. State

16 So. 3d 232, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 11570, 2009 WL 2514170

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 19, 2009 | Docket: 1640821

Cited 3 times | Published

time of the primary offense." See also Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.703(d)(15); 3.704(d)(14). Sanders committed

Category: Criminal Procedure

Key v. State

990 So. 2d 529, 2008 WL 440755

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 20, 2008 | Docket: 2577615

Cited 3 times | Published

has forty sentence points or less. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.703(d)(25) (1996).[1] Because the defendant

Category: Criminal Procedure

Pierre v. State

821 So. 2d 1174, 2002 WL 1625460

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 24, 2002 | Docket: 1657101

Cited 3 times | Published

See § 921.0016(1)(c), Fla. Stat. (1997); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.703(d)(29) (1997). The defendant filed a timely

Category: Criminal Procedure

Bigham v. State

761 So. 2d 431, 2000 WL 679774

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 26, 2000 | Docket: 1709282

Cited 3 times | Published

his sentences were run consecutively. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.703(d)(3) (stating "[i]f an offender is before

Category: Criminal Procedure

Kelly v. State

706 So. 2d 396, 1998 WL 64971

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 19, 1998 | Docket: 1280833

Cited 3 times | Published

have been assessed under subsection (d)(16) of rule 3.703 because points were assessed under subsection

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hoffman v. State

700 So. 2d 765, 1997 WL 631141

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 15, 1997 | Docket: 1719640

Cited 3 times | Published

sign the scoresheet. (emphasis added). Further, Rule 3.703(d)(29)(A), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Sheffield v. State

214 So. 3d 763, 2017 WL 1093191, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 3826

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 23, 2017 | Docket: 60264231

Cited 2 times | Published

multiplier for law enforcement protection. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.703(d)(22) (requiring imposition of a multiplier

Category: Criminal Procedure

Felder v. State

828 So. 2d 409, 2002 WL 31126642

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 27, 2002 | Docket: 2583598

Cited 2 times | Published

three community sanction violations. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.703(d)(17) (providing that six points are to

Category: Criminal Procedure

Snipes v. State

793 So. 2d 1107, 2001 WL 988029

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 30, 2001 | Docket: 1266266

Cited 2 times | Published

resolved in the defendant's favor. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.703(d)(15)(D); Dautel, 658 So.2d at 90. The

Category: Criminal Procedure

Williams v. State

784 So. 2d 524, 2001 WL 417331

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 25, 2001 | Docket: 1744102

Cited 2 times | Published

enactments of the amendments to section 775.087 and rule 3.703(c)(2)(1995 sentencing guidelines), courts have

Category: Criminal Procedure

Marciniak v. State

754 So. 2d 877, 2000 WL 370227

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 12, 2000 | Docket: 431077

Cited 2 times | Published

refers to the guidelines analog to this statute, Rule 3.703(d)(27), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.

Category: Criminal Procedure

Trombley v. State

754 So. 2d 121, 2000 WL 282339

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 17, 2000 | Docket: 1523566

Cited 2 times | Published

even if it exceeds the statutory maximum. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.703(d)(27). Second, Trombley argues the trial

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lowe v. State

742 So. 2d 350, 1999 WL 606475

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 13, 1999 | Docket: 1302924

Cited 2 times | Published

count could properly be scored. Lowe argues that rule 3.703(d)(9) amended in 1995, permits scoring for each

Category: Criminal Procedure

Schmiel v. State

727 So. 2d 257, 1999 WL 68450

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 11, 1999 | Docket: 1438427

Cited 2 times | Published

an officer without violence, the language of rule 3.703(d)(19) expressly limits its application to felony

Category: Criminal Procedure

Rager v. State

720 So. 2d 1134, 1998 WL 769782

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 6, 1998 | Docket: 1371808

Cited 2 times | Published

resolved in a defendant's favor. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.703(d)(15)(D).[5] Rule 3.703(d)(15)(E) provides: When unable

Category: Criminal Procedure

Myers v. FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COM'N

705 So. 2d 1000, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 911, 1998 WL 39400

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 4, 1998 | Docket: 1753767

Cited 2 times | Published

scored under the sentencing guidelines. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.703(d)(15)(C). Arrests may not be considered

Category: Criminal Procedure

EDDIE ISAAC BEAN v. STATE OF FLORIDA

264 So. 3d 947

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 9, 2019 | Docket: 8485203

Cited 1 times | Published

defendant has been convicted. Id.; see Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.703(d)(9). Sections 921.0021(7) and 921.0024

Category: Criminal Procedure

Young v. State

15 So. 3d 819, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 9993, 2009 WL 2168849

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 22, 2009 | Docket: 1660265

Cited 1 times | Published

court to exceed the statutory maximum. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.703(d)(31) (providing that if a split sentence

Category: Criminal Procedure

Wilkinson v. State

957 So. 2d 1256, 2007 WL 1342477

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 9, 2007 | Docket: 1271271

Cited 1 times | Published

and SUAREZ, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.703(d)(30)(A); see also Lawson v. State, 812

Category: Criminal Procedure

Daniels v. State

929 So. 2d 710, 2006 WL 1418661

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 25, 2006 | Docket: 1726976

Cited 1 times | Published

pending before the court for sentencing." Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.703(d)(2). In contrast, Gadsden County counts

Category: Criminal Procedure

Vargas v. Secretary, Department of Corrections

373 F. Supp. 2d 1323, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16735, 2005 WL 1432790

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jun 20, 2005 | Docket: 2141665

Cited 1 times | Published

improperly applied the drug trafficking multiplier of Rule 3.703(d)(21) at sentencing; ninth, that the trial court

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ellis v. State

881 So. 2d 685, 2004 WL 1906105

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 27, 2004 | Docket: 861932

Cited 1 times | Published

So.2d 514 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992). [2] See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.703(d)(28).

Category: Criminal Procedure

Seccia v. State

786 So. 2d 12, 2001 WL 328562

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 5, 2001 | Docket: 1681964

Cited 1 times | Published

offenses committed on or after October 1, 1995. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.703(a). Because appellant's offenses were committed

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. White

762 So. 2d 927, 2000 WL 377074

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 14, 2000 | Docket: 1690889

Cited 1 times | Published

pursuant to s. 921.001(4)(b). See also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.703(d)(3). The State argued that the court should

Category: Criminal Procedure

Newman v. State

738 So. 2d 981, 24 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1619

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 9, 1999 | Docket: 1503206

Cited 1 times | Published

775.087, 775.0875, or 794.023 [,]" and that rule 3.703(c)(2) provides that "[a]n offense does not become

Category: Criminal Procedure

ANTHONY SAMPSON v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 27, 2022 | Docket: 64435978

Published

aggravation or mitigation of the sentence”); Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.703(d)(30)(B)

Category: Criminal Procedure

Patterson v. State

197 So. 3d 1220, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 11359, 2016 WL 4035595

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 27, 2016 | Docket: 4114277

Published

provide valid written reasons. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.703(d)(30). Nevertheless, the postconviction

Category: Criminal Procedure

Morse v. State

169 So. 3d 1257, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 11188, 2015 WL 4486527

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 24, 2015 | Docket: 60248842

Published

“primary offenses” totaling 108 points. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.703(d)(7)-(8). This error resulted in reflecting

Category: Criminal Procedure

Wheeler v. State

171 So. 3d 169, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 11200, 2015 WL 4497834

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 24, 2015 | Docket: 2679087

Published

within seven days of sentencing as required by rule 3.703(d)(30)(A). The court reporter complied with the

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. McKinley

109 So. 3d 301, 2013 WL 811600, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 3521

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 6, 2013 | Docket: 60229553

Published

921.0024(3), Fla. Stat. (2010); see also Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.703(d)(2) (2010) (“One scoresheet shall be

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hyland v. State

25 So. 3d 1251, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 274, 2010 WL 173633

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 20, 2010 | Docket: 1254726

Published

reduced in count two of the information. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.703(d)(6) ("`Conviction' means a determination

Category: Criminal Procedure

Bell v. State

968 So. 2d 1048, 2007 WL 4206951

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 30, 2007 | Docket: 1373060

Published

effect at the time of his offense and pursuant to Rule 3.703(d)(27), Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure, his

Category: Criminal Procedure

Wilkinson v. State

957 So. 2d 1256, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 7041

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 9, 2007 | Docket: 64850967

Published

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.703(d)(30)(A); see also Lawson v. State, 812 So.2d 518 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

Arthur v. State

927 So. 2d 86, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 5060, 2006 WL 1027019

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 7, 2006 | Docket: 64844196

Published

State, 789 So.2d 1194 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.703(d)(3). However, in order to make a facially

Category: Criminal Procedure

Knarich v. State

932 So. 2d 257, 2005 WL 2172240

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 9, 2005 | Docket: 1285649

Published

illustrative rather than exclusive. Id.; see also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.703(d)(30). In support of the sentence imposed

Category: Criminal Procedure

Squires v. State

891 So. 2d 600, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 353, 2005 WL 120492

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 21, 2005 | Docket: 64835472

Published

points higher than it should have been. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.703(d)(19). The points for use of a firearm

Category: Criminal Procedure

Thomas v. State

875 So. 2d 804, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 9012, 2004 WL 1439669

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 29, 2004 | Docket: 64831148

Published

appellant for this offense. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.703(a) (prescribing that rule 3.703 applies to offenses committed

Category: Criminal Procedure

Sailor v. State

877 So. 2d 738, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 6042, 2004 WL 913220

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 30, 2004 | Docket: 64831825

Published

Court considered the issue en banc and held that rule 3.703(d)(9) required the trial court to score victim

Category: Criminal Procedure

Brooks v. State

851 So. 2d 873, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 12112

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 12, 2003 | Docket: 64824286

Published

the *876sentencing guidelines); see also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.703(d)(2). As such, it is not clear that the

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Howard

854 So. 2d 696, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 11410, 2003 WL 21749044

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 30, 2003 | Docket: 64825147

Published

See § 921.0014(3), Fla. Stat. (1997); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.703(d)(3). Affirmed in part, reversed in part

Category: Criminal Procedure

Whitney v. State

832 So. 2d 928, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 19870, 2002 WL 31950370

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 23, 2002 | Docket: 64819522

Published

Bruno v. State, 807 So.2d 55 (Fla.2001). Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.703(d)(31). AFFIRMED. THOMPSON, CJ., SHARP,

Category: Criminal Procedure

Smith v. State

798 So. 2d 40, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 14642, 2001 WL 1231698

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 17, 2001 | Docket: 64809685

Published

assessment of the additional points. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.703(d)(19). The trial court’s addition of these

Category: Criminal Procedure

Kiste v. State

790 So. 2d 1198, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 10924, 2001 WL 871538

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 3, 2001 | Docket: 64807265

Published

*1200See § 921.0014, Fla. Stat (1995); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.703(d)(17). This point assessment was not available

Category: Criminal Procedure

Leonard v. State

785 So. 2d 688, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 6655, 2001 WL 514299

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 16, 2001 | Docket: 64805492

Published

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.703(d)(2),(3); Clements v. State, 761 So.2d 1245, 1245 n. 1

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hart v. State

773 So. 2d 605, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 15924, 2000 WL 1781087

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 6, 2000 | Docket: 64802430

Published

such a multiplier to be correctly used. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.703(d)(23). The state responded that any scoresheet

Category: Criminal Procedure

Pitts v. State

771 So. 2d 1259, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 14796, 2000 WL 1701134

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 15, 2000 | Docket: 64801902

Published

the particular felony was committed.”); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.703(d)(3)(“If an offender is before the court

Category: Criminal Procedure

Holman v. State

769 So. 2d 514, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 13704, 2000 WL 1567844

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 23, 2000 | Docket: 64801099

Published

Both section 921.001(5), Florida Statutes, and Rule 3.703(d)(27) provide that a person sentenced for a

Category: Criminal Procedure

Jones v. State

771 So. 2d 51, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 13072, 2000 WL 1475715

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 6, 2000 | Docket: 64801660

Published

pending before the court for sentencing. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.703(d)(2). That is the process the trial court

Category: Criminal Procedure

Price v. State

762 So. 2d 1035, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 9411, 2000 WL 1022382

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 26, 2000 | Docket: 64798848

Published

Procedure 3.702(d)(14) has been superceded by rule 3.703(d)(22).

Category: Criminal Procedure

Copeland v. State

765 So. 2d 216, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 9047, 2000 WL 990972

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 20, 2000 | Docket: 64799701

Published

violation of probation for the 1995 offense. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.703(d)(17) applies to the appellant’s 1998 offense

Category: Criminal Procedure

Pace v. State

760 So. 2d 987, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 7007, 2000 WL 731911

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 9, 2000 | Docket: 64798108

Published

guidelines, separate scoresheets were required. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.703(d)(3). The record on appeal contains the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lowery v. State

754 So. 2d 888, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 4419, 2000 WL 378204

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 14, 2000 | Docket: 64796342

Published

1998); § 921.001(5), Fla. Stat. (1999); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.703(d)(28). However, the total sanction of incarceration

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Lindsay

753 So. 2d 705, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 2960, 2000 WL 282780

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 17, 2000 | Docket: 64795953

Published

because of a community sanction violation. See rule 3.703(17), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. We

Category: Criminal Procedure

Dover v. State

760 So. 2d 159, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 1352, 2000 WL 158515

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 16, 2000 | Docket: 64797911

Published

each successive violation 'of probation. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.703(17); Williams v. State, 594 So.2d 273, 274

Category: Criminal Procedure

Degregorio v. State

750 So. 2d 759, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 976, 2000 WL 126057

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 4, 2000 | Docket: 64794759

Published

eighteen points for the use of a firearm. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.703(d)(19). When the scoresheet is properly

Category: Criminal Procedure

Grubb v. State

748 So. 2d 395, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 438, 2000 WL 51822

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 25, 2000 | Docket: 64793848

Published

Accordingly, we reverse and remand for resentencing. Rule 3.703(d)(17) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Category: Criminal Procedure

Padilla v. State

750 So. 2d 671, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 17001, 1999 WL 1221457

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 22, 1999 | Docket: 64794720

Published

statutory maximum for the offense. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.703(d)(28); Willis v. State, 736 So .2d 1251

Category: Criminal Procedure

Vitanzo v. State

750 So. 2d 662, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 15601, 1999 WL 1049349

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 22, 1999 | Docket: 64794716

Published

or pretrial intervention or diversion. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.703(d)(17). However, the existence of multiple

Category: Criminal Procedure

Cooper v. State

743 So. 2d 1213, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 14853, 1999 WL 1016312

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 10, 1999 | Docket: 64791954

Published

See § 921.001(4)(b)4, Fla. Stat. (1995); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.703(d)(3). Appellant committed one offense before

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hyman v. State

744 So. 2d 566, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 14833, 1999 WL 1014939

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 10, 1999 | Docket: 64792088

Published

for the subsequent non-felony violation. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.703(17) (1998). The trial court, by assessing

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Miller

743 So. 2d 141, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 13483, 1999 WL 817831

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 13, 1999 | Docket: 64791665

Published

utilized one guideline scoresheet. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.703(d)(2); Harris v. State, 619 So.2d 1043,

Category: Criminal Procedure

Frazier v. State

743 So. 2d 1149, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 11155, 1999 WL 632099

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 13, 1999 | Docket: 64791904

Published

argues that under section 921.0024(l)(b) and rule 3.703(d)(17) a maximum of 12 community sanction violation

Category: Criminal Procedure

Brown v. State

741 So. 2d 1242, 1999 WL 781780

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 4, 1999 | Docket: 453083

Published

Florida Statutes (1997) and subparagraph (d)(17) of rule 3.703, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. In section

Category: Criminal Procedure

Crossley v. State

741 So. 2d 1208, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 12677, 1999 WL 754710

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 24, 1999 | Docket: 64791235

Published

purposes of scoring points for sentencing. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.703(d)(19). The fact that the jury did not make

Category: Criminal Procedure

Turner v. State

735 So. 2d 616, 1999 WL 503477

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 19, 1999 | Docket: 149306

Published

presented. § 921.014, Fla. Stat. (Supp. 1996); rule 3.703(d)(17), Fla. R. Crim P. We direct that the trial

Category: Criminal Procedure

Fluckers v. State

727 So. 2d 416, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 4088, 1999 WL 173701

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 31, 1999 | Docket: 64786521

Published

violation. See § 921.0014(3), Fla. Stat. (1995); Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.703(d). Accordingly, we remand this case to

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Shillingford

731 So. 2d 57, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 3410, 1999 WL 156065

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 24, 1999 | Docket: 64787801

Published

sanction, including community control. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.703(d)(27)(1997). The trial court sentenced

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Loesch

726 So. 2d 853, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 966, 1999 WL 49504

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 5, 1999 | Docket: 64786323

Published

and community sanction violation points); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.703(16)(G),(H)(le-gal status points and community

Category: Criminal Procedure

Campos v. State

724 So. 2d 706, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 655, 1999 WL 30665

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 27, 1999 | Docket: 64785607

Published

section 921.0014(2), Florida Statutes (1997) and rule 3.703(d)(27), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.

Category: Criminal Procedure

Jimerson v. State

724 So. 2d 170, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 16355, 1998 WL 903922

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 30, 1998 | Docket: 64785471

Published

three or more grand theft convictions. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.703(d)(23). Because appellant’s primary offense

Category: Criminal Procedure

Linton v. State

721 So. 2d 743, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 13812, 1998 WL 754393

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 30, 1998 | Docket: 64784629

Published

the guidelines recommended sentence. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.703(d)(31). See also Ortiz v. State, 696 So

Category: Criminal Procedure

Cleveland v. State

717 So. 2d 188, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11836, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2160

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 18, 1998 | Docket: 64782692

Published

of Criminal Procedure 3.703(d)(19). We affirm. Rule 3.703(d)(10) provides that 25 points should be added

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Ellis

715 So. 2d 364, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 10362, 1998 WL 472823

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 14, 1998 | Docket: 64782056

Published

and concurs specially, with opinion. . Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.703(d)(30)(A).

Category: Criminal Procedure

Thomas v. State

711 So. 2d 89, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 3808, 1998 WL 171392

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 15, 1998 | Docket: 64781045

Published

points to achieve a state prison sentence ... Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.703(d)(26). Increasing the points and/or increasing

Category: Criminal Procedure

Lester v. State

702 So. 2d 598, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 13537, 1997 WL 741171

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 3, 1997 | Docket: 64777289

Published

offense is aggravated assault on a police officer. Rule 3.703(d)(22) is applicable only to offenses committed

Category: Criminal Procedure

Sailor v. State

701 So. 2d 673, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 13306, 1997 WL 730264

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 26, 1997 | Docket: 64776814

Published

Betancourt, 552 So.2d 1107 (Fla.1989); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.703(d)(29), as adopted in Amendments to Florida

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Sullivan

701 So. 2d 633, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 12722, 1997 WL 716849

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 12, 1997 | Docket: 64776781

Published

sentencing was carrying a concealed firearm. We agree. Rule 3.703(d)(19) requires that eighteen points be assessed

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Vela

700 So. 2d 779, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 11851, 1997 WL 637646

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 17, 1997 | Docket: 64776326

Published

Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.703(d)(19). Rule 3.703(d)(19) is a provision of the amended 1994 sentencing

Category: Criminal Procedure

Wright v. State

699 So. 2d 327, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 10706, 1997 WL 592105

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 24, 1997 | Docket: 64775873

Published

exceed the term provided by general law. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.703(d)(30). The sexual battery conviction in

Category: Criminal Procedure

Amendments to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

696 So. 2d 1171, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 367, 1997 Fla. LEXIS 951, 1997 WL 348098

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 26, 1997 | Docket: 64775015

Published

effective July 1, 1997, except the amendments to rule 3.703(d)(25) and rule 3.991(a) required by chapter

Category: Criminal Procedure

Amendments to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure re Sentencing Guidelines

685 So. 2d 1213, 21 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 407, 1996 Fla. LEXIS 1631, 1996 WL 547189

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 26, 1996 | Docket: 64770228

Published

as appended to this opinion. The amendment to rule 3.703 is effective October 1, 1996. The amendment to

Category: Criminal Procedure

Amendments to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure re Sentencing Guidelines

660 So. 2d 1374, 20 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 490, 1995 Fla. LEXIS 1555, 1995 WL 555322

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 21, 1995 | Docket: 64759124

Published

HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur. APPENDIX RULE 3.703 SENTENCING GUIDELINES (1994 as amended in 1995)

Category: Criminal Procedure