Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.213 - CONTINUING INCOMPETENCY TO PROCEED, | Syfert Law

Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448

Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.213

RULE 3.213. CONTINUING INCOMPETENCY TO PROCEED,
EXCEPT INCOMPETENCY TO PROCEED WITH

SENTENCING; DISPOSITION

(a) Dismissal without Prejudice during Continuing
Incompetency.

After a determination that a person is incompetent to stand
trial or proceed with a probation or community control violation
hearing, the charge(s):

(1) shall be dismissed 1 year after a finding if the
charge is a misdemeanor;

(2) shall be dismissed no later than 2 years after a
finding if incompetency is due to intellectual disability or autism;

(3) may be dismissed 3 years after a finding, unless a
charge is listed in section 916.145, Florida Statutes; or

(4) shall be dismissed after a finding that the defendant
has remained incompetent for 5 continuous and uninterrupted
years;

provided that the court finds that the defendant remains
incompetent to stand trial or proceed with a probation or
community control violation hearing unless the court in its order
specifies its reasons for believing that the defendant is expected to
become competent to proceed. A dismissal under this rule shall be
without prejudice to the state to refile the charge(s) should the
defendant be declared competent to proceed in the future.
(b) Commitment or Treatment during Continuing
Incompetency.

(1) If the defendant meets the criteria for commitment
under section 394.467, Florida Statutes, the court shall commit the
defendant to the Department of Children and Families for
involuntary hospitalization solely under the provisions of law. If the
defendant meets the criteria of section 394.4655, Florida Statutes,
the court may order that the defendant receive outpatient treatment
at any other facility or service on an outpatient basis subject to the
provisions of those statutes. In the order of commitment, the judge
shall order that the administrator of an inpatient facility notify the
state attorney of the committing circuit no less than 30 days prior
to the anticipated date of release of the defendant.

(2) If the continuing incompetency is due to intellectual
disability or autism, and the defendant either lacks the ability to
provide for his or her well-being or is likely to physically injure
himself or herself, or others, the defendant may be involuntarily
admitted to residential services as provided by law.

(c) Applicability. This rule shall not apply to defendants
determined to be incompetent to proceed with sentencing, which is
addressed in rule 3.214.

Committee Notes

1980 Adoption. As to involuntary hospitalization, see section
394.467(1), Florida Statutes (1979); as to involuntary admission to
residential services, see chapter 393, Florida Statutes (1979).

(b) This provision is meant to deal with the defendant who
remains incompetent after 5 years, and who does meet the criteria
for involuntary hospitalization. It provides that the criminal charges
will be dismissed and the defendant will be involuntarily
hospitalized. It further provides that the administrator of the facility
must notify the state attorney prior to any release of a defendant
committed pursuant to this subdivision.
As to criteria for involuntary hospitalization, see section
394.467(1), Florida Statutes (1979); in case of retardation, see
chapter 393, Florida Statutes (1979).

(c) Since commitment criteria for a defendant determined to
be incompetent to stand trial are the same as for civil
hospitalization, there is no need to continue the difference between
felony and misdemeanor procedure.

Section 916.14, Florida Statutes, makes the statute of
limitations and defense of former jeopardy inapplicable to criminal
charges dismissed because of incompetence of defendant to stand
trial.

1988 Amendment. Title. The title has been amended to
comply with changes in rule 3.210, but specifically excludes
competency to proceed with sentencing, which is addressed in the
new rule 3.214.

(a) This provision was amended to reflect changes in rules
3.210 and 3.211. New language is added which specifies that, if
charges are dismissed under this rule, it is without prejudice to the
state to refile if the defendant is declared competent to proceed in
the future. Similar language was previously found in rule 3.214(d),
but is more appropriate under this rule.

(b) This provision has been amended for the same reasons
as (a) above.

(c) This new provision specifically exempts this rule from
being used against a defendant determined to be incompetent to be
sentenced, which is now provided in the new rule 3.214. It is
replaced by the new rule 3.214.

1992 Amendment. The purpose of the amendment is to
gender neutralize the wording of the rule.

Introductory Note Relating to Amendments to Rules 3.210 to
3.219.

See notes following rule 3.210 for the text of this note.

Cases Citing Rule 3.213

Total Results: 39

In Re Amendments to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

536 So. 2d 992, 1988 WL 143602

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 30, 1988 | Docket: 2517246

Cited 27 times | Published

provision are for the same reasons as (4) above. RULE 3.213. CONTINUING INCOMPETENCY TO STAND TRIAL PROCEED

Category: Criminal Procedure

Gonzalez v. State

15 So. 3d 37, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 5513, 2009 WL 1393071

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 20, 2009 | Docket: 1192581

Cited 14 times | Published

order denying motion to dismiss filed under Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.213); see also Hines v. State, 931 So.2d 148

Category: Criminal Procedure

Mosher v. State

876 So. 2d 1230, 2004 WL 1263716

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 10, 2004 | Docket: 1245462

Cited 14 times | Published

trial court denied the motion, ruling that Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.213 and section 916.145, Florida Statutes (2002)

Category: Criminal Procedure

Thompson v. Crawford

479 So. 2d 169, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2597

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 20, 1985 | Docket: 1514375

Cited 12 times | Published

toward that goal... ." Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.210(a)(5). Rule 3.213, in effect on December 12, 1980,[25] provides:

Category: Criminal Procedure

In Re Amend. to Fla. Rules of Cr. Proc.

606 So. 2d 227, 1992 WL 246494

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 24, 1992 | Docket: 2191048

Cited 9 times | Published

following rule 3.210 for the text of this note. RULE 3.213. CONTINUING INCOMPETENCY TO PROCEED, EXCEPT INCOMPETENCY

Category: Criminal Procedure

Hines v. State

931 So. 2d 148, 2006 WL 1210208

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 8, 2006 | Docket: 1522297

Cited 8 times | Published

303(1), Florida Statutes (2002), conflicts with rule 3.213(a), and it states: The charges against any defendant

Category: Criminal Procedure

Downing v. State

617 So. 2d 864, 1993 WL 143936

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 7, 1993 | Docket: 1512483

Cited 7 times | Published

order denying the petitioner's motion pursuant to rule 3.213, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. For the

Category: Criminal Procedure

Vasquez v. State

496 So. 2d 818, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 548

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 30, 1986 | Docket: 1522747

Cited 5 times | Published

an order "declining to dismiss charges under Rule 3.213(b) against a defendant who indisputably must

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Smith

982 So. 2d 756, 2008 WL 2261539

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 4, 2008 | Docket: 1199923

Cited 4 times | Published

may find it appropriate to consider amending Rule 3.213 to reflect such a distinction."). Section 916

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Offill

837 So. 2d 533, 2003 WL 289001

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 12, 2003 | Docket: 1527452

Cited 4 times | Published

were dismissed without prejudice pursuant to rule 3.213(a); and (3) because Offill had been conditionally

Category: Criminal Procedure

Amendments to Rules of Criminal Procedure

942 So. 2d 407, 2006 WL 3229930

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 9, 2006 | Docket: 1471518

Cited 3 times | Published

amendment addresses the issue presented by Capuzzo. Rule 3.213, Continuing Incompetency to Proceed, Except Incompetency

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Cooks

642 So. 2d 23, 1994 WL 406142

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 5, 1994 | Docket: 549840

Cited 3 times | Published

competent to proceed in the future." See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.213(a). Accordingly, there is nothing "permanent"

Category: Criminal Procedure

Henry v. State

178 So. 3d 928, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 16711, 2015 WL 6757300

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 6, 2015 | Docket: 60251630

Cited 2 times | Published

competent to proceed in the .future-. . . Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.213(a)(2). The order denying Henry’s motion

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Miranda

137 So. 3d 1133, 2014 WL 1304724, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 4823

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 2, 2014 | Docket: 60240187

Cited 2 times | Published

either be civilly committed or released. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.213(a)(1). On the other hand, [i]f the incompetency

Category: Criminal Procedure

Byrd v. State

834 So. 2d 872, 2002 WL 31373628

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 23, 2002 | Docket: 2583639

Cited 2 times | Published

may find it appropriate to consider amending Rule 3.213 to reflect such a distinction. DENIED. BENTON

Category: Criminal Procedure

In RE: AMENDMENTS TO the FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE-2018 REGULAR-CYCLE REPORT.

265 So. 3d 494

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 4, 2018 | Docket: 7982207

Cited 1 times | Published

circumstance to grant an extension. In regard to rule 3.213 (Continuing Incompetency to Proceed, Except Incompetency

Category: Criminal Procedure

In re Amendments to the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

132 So. 3d 123, 38 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 890, 2013 WL 6500885, 2013 Fla. LEXIS 2685

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 12, 2013 | Docket: 60238356

Cited 1 times | Published

Change] (d) [No Change] Committee Notes [No Change] RULE 3.213. CONTINUING INCOMPETENCY TO PROCEED, EXCEPT INCOMPETENCY

Category: Criminal Procedure

Tiburcio v. State

95 So. 3d 1037, 2012 WL 3758658, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 14632

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 27, 2012 | Docket: 60311062

Cited 1 times | Published

since Petitioner was found incompetent. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.213(a)(1). We agree with the State on both issues

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Heidrick

707 So. 2d 1165, 1998 WL 88372

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 4, 1998 | Docket: 1676006

Cited 1 times | Published

been dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 3.213(b), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. We deny

Category: Criminal Procedure

STATE OF FLORIDA v. DENISE FUNG TILLMAN

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 17, 2022 | Docket: 64898831

Published

a motion to dismiss in each case pursuant to rule 3.213(a)(1). The trial court acknowledged at the hearing

Category: Criminal Procedure

ALAN NERETTE v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 21, 2021 | Docket: 60073807

Published

a court-ordered competency evaluation before rule 3.213’s one- year time limit ran, we deny the petition

Category: Criminal Procedure

STATE OF FLORIDA v. CHARLES MORRIS

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 3, 2020 | Docket: 17218379

Published

competent to proceed in the future. Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.213(a) (2019). The State relies on State

Category: Criminal Procedure

In Re: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure - 2018 Regular-Cycle Report

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 19, 2018 | Docket: 7471972

Published

circumstance to grant an extension. In regard to rule 3.213 (Continuing Incompetency to Proceed, Except

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Noel

228 So. 3d 727, 2017 WL 4844921

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 27, 2017 | Docket: 60279915

Published

defendant because the order was premature. Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.213(a)(1); State v. Carey, 212 So.3d 448 (Fla

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Carey

212 So. 3d 448, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 209

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 11, 2017 | Docket: 4565892

Published

dismissal of the criminal action. We agree. Rule 3.213(a)(1) generally provides that charges “shall”

Category: Criminal Procedure

McCray v. State

200 So. 3d 1296, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 14829, 2016 WL 5845694

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 5, 2016 | Docket: 4469182

Published

mental illness. See § 916.145; Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.213(a)(1); State v. Benninghoff,

Category: Criminal Procedure

State of Florida v. Cynthia J. Benninghoff

188 So. 3d 64, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 4521, 2016 WL 1129917

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 23, 2016 | Docket: 3046936

Published

2015 The defendant moves to dismiss, pursuant to rule 3.213(b) and Jackson v. Indiana, 406 U.S

Category: Criminal Procedure

D.S. v. State

164 So. 3d 1257, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 8570, 2015 WL 3510309

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 5, 2015 | Docket: 60247918

Published

meets the criteria for commitment. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.213(b). If the defendant remains incompetent

Category: Criminal Procedure

Linn v. State

79 So. 3d 783, 2011 WL 6184469

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 14, 2011 | Docket: 60305381

Published

his attorney filed a motion to dismiss under rule 3.213(b), which states, in pertinent part: If at any

Category: Criminal Procedure

Sanchez v. State

949 So. 2d 1059, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 51, 2007 WL 5784

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 3, 2007 | Docket: 64849489

Published

meet the criteria for commitment,.... ” Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.213(a). In a subsection “(a)” release, the charges

Category: Criminal Procedure

State, Department of Children & Families v. Reyes

829 So. 2d 252, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 12775, 2002 WL 2009793

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 4, 2002 | Docket: 64818564

Published

chapters 394 and 916, Florida Statutes (2001), and rule 3.213, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure (2001),

Category: Criminal Procedure

Amendments to the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

794 So. 2d 457, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 2556, 2000 WL 1637548

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 2, 2000 | Docket: 64808411

Published

“notice of expiration of speedy trial time.” RULE 3.213. CONTINUING INCOMPETENCY TO PROCEED, EXCEPT INCOMPETENCY

Category: Criminal Procedure

State v. Johns

651 So. 2d 1227, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 2047, 1995 WL 85166

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 3, 1995 | Docket: 64755029

Published

removed from the state the opportunity granted by rule 3.213(a) to refile the charges should the appellee

Category: Criminal Procedure

Zabalo v. State

513 So. 2d 701, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2167, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 12154

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 8, 1987 | Docket: 64629934

Published

dismiss the indictment against him pursuant to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.213(b). For the reasons which follow, we deny

Category: Criminal Procedure

Vasquez v. State

474 So. 2d 394, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1993, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15553

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 20, 1985 | Docket: 64613711

Published

as here, declining to dismiss charges under Rule 3.213(b) against a defendant who indisputably must

Category: Criminal Procedure

Clarke v. State

455 So. 2d 1112

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 18, 1984 | Docket: 64606809

Published

be considered for the remedies provided under Rule 3.213(b) Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, said

Category: Criminal Procedure

Ricciardelli v. State

453 So. 2d 199, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14238

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 25, 1984 | Docket: 64606052

Published

regime were instituted. However, the test under Rule 3.213(b) is whether there is a substantial probability

Category: Criminal Procedure

Warwick v. State

443 So. 2d 188, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 25192

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 13, 1983 | Docket: 64601940

Published

this case from Garrett v. State, 390 So.2d 95. Rule 3.213 sets an outer limit for holding a person on a

Category: Criminal Procedure

Florida Bar

389 So. 2d 610, 1980 Fla. LEXIS 4378

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 18, 1980 | Docket: 64578555

Published

defendants adjudicated incompetent to stand trial. RULE 3.213: CONTINUING INCOMPETENCY TO STAND TRIAL: DISPOSITION

Category: Criminal Procedure