Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.213
RULE 3.213. CONTINUING INCOMPETENCY TO PROCEED,
EXCEPT INCOMPETENCY TO PROCEED WITH
SENTENCING; DISPOSITION
(a) Dismissal without Prejudice during Continuing
Incompetency.
After a determination that a person is incompetent to stand
trial or proceed with a probation or community control violation
hearing, the charge(s):
(1) shall be dismissed 1 year after a finding if the
charge is a misdemeanor;
(2) shall be dismissed no later than 2 years after a
finding if incompetency is due to intellectual disability or autism;
(3) may be dismissed 3 years after a finding, unless a
charge is listed in section
916.145, Florida Statutes; or
(4) shall be dismissed after a finding that the defendant
has remained incompetent for 5 continuous and uninterrupted
years;
provided that the court finds that the defendant remains
incompetent to stand trial or proceed with a probation or
community control violation hearing unless the court in its order
specifies its reasons for believing that the defendant is expected to
become competent to proceed. A dismissal under this rule shall be
without prejudice to the state to refile the charge(s) should the
defendant be declared competent to proceed in the future.
(b) Commitment or Treatment during Continuing
Incompetency.
(1) If the defendant meets the criteria for commitment
under section
394.467, Florida Statutes, the court shall commit the
defendant to the Department of Children and Families for
involuntary hospitalization solely under the provisions of law. If the
defendant meets the criteria of section
394.4655, Florida Statutes,
the court may order that the defendant receive outpatient treatment
at any other facility or service on an outpatient basis subject to the
provisions of those statutes. In the order of commitment, the judge
shall order that the administrator of an inpatient facility notify the
state attorney of the committing circuit no less than 30 days prior
to the anticipated date of release of the defendant.
(2) If the continuing incompetency is due to intellectual
disability or autism, and the defendant either lacks the ability to
provide for his or her well-being or is likely to physically injure
himself or herself, or others, the defendant may be involuntarily
admitted to residential services as provided by law.
(c) Applicability. This rule shall not apply to defendants
determined to be incompetent to proceed with sentencing, which is
addressed in rule
3.214.
Committee Notes
1980 Adoption. As to involuntary hospitalization, see section
394.467(1), Florida Statutes (1979); as to involuntary admission to
residential services, see chapter 393, Florida Statutes (1979).
(b) This provision is meant to deal with the defendant who
remains incompetent after 5 years, and who does meet the criteria
for involuntary hospitalization. It provides that the criminal charges
will be dismissed and the defendant will be involuntarily
hospitalized. It further provides that the administrator of the facility
must notify the state attorney prior to any release of a defendant
committed pursuant to this subdivision.
As to criteria for involuntary hospitalization, see section
394.467(1), Florida Statutes (1979); in case of retardation, see
chapter 393, Florida Statutes (1979).
(c) Since commitment criteria for a defendant determined to
be incompetent to stand trial are the same as for civil
hospitalization, there is no need to continue the difference between
felony and misdemeanor procedure.
Section
916.14, Florida Statutes, makes the statute of
limitations and defense of former jeopardy inapplicable to criminal
charges dismissed because of incompetence of defendant to stand
trial.
1988 Amendment. Title. The title has been amended to
comply with changes in rule
3.210, but specifically excludes
competency to proceed with sentencing, which is addressed in the
new rule
3.214.
(a) This provision was amended to reflect changes in rules
3.210 and
3.211. New language is added which specifies that, if
charges are dismissed under this rule, it is without prejudice to the
state to refile if the defendant is declared competent to proceed in
the future. Similar language was previously found in rule
3.214(d),
but is more appropriate under this rule.
(b) This provision has been amended for the same reasons
as (a) above.
(c) This new provision specifically exempts this rule from
being used against a defendant determined to be incompetent to be
sentenced, which is now provided in the new rule
3.214. It is
replaced by the new rule
3.214.
1992 Amendment. The purpose of the amendment is to
gender neutralize the wording of the rule.
Introductory Note Relating to Amendments to Rules
3.210 to
3.219.
See notes following rule
3.210 for the text of this note.
Cases Citing Rule 3.213
Total Results: 39
536 So. 2d 992, 1988 WL 143602
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 30, 1988 | Docket: 2517246
Cited 27 times | Published
provision are for the same reasons as
(4) above.
RULE 3.213. CONTINUING INCOMPETENCY TO STAND TRIAL PROCEED
Category: Criminal Procedure
15 So. 3d 37, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 5513, 2009 WL 1393071
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 20, 2009 | Docket: 1192581
Cited 14 times | Published
order denying motion to dismiss filed under Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.213); see also Hines v. State, 931 So.2d 148
Category: Criminal Procedure
876 So. 2d 1230, 2004 WL 1263716
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 10, 2004 | Docket: 1245462
Cited 14 times | Published
trial court denied the motion, ruling that Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.213 and section 916.145, Florida Statutes (2002)
Category: Criminal Procedure
479 So. 2d 169, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2597
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 20, 1985 | Docket: 1514375
Cited 12 times | Published
toward that goal... ." Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.210(a)(5). Rule 3.213, in effect on December 12, 1980,[25] provides:
Category: Criminal Procedure
606 So. 2d 227, 1992 WL 246494
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 24, 1992 | Docket: 2191048
Cited 9 times | Published
following rule 3.210 for the text of this note.
RULE 3.213. CONTINUING INCOMPETENCY TO PROCEED, EXCEPT INCOMPETENCY
Category: Criminal Procedure
931 So. 2d 148, 2006 WL 1210208
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 8, 2006 | Docket: 1522297
Cited 8 times | Published
303(1), Florida Statutes (2002), conflicts with rule 3.213(a), and it states:
The charges against any defendant
Category: Criminal Procedure
617 So. 2d 864, 1993 WL 143936
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 7, 1993 | Docket: 1512483
Cited 7 times | Published
order denying the petitioner's motion pursuant to rule 3.213, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. For the
Category: Criminal Procedure
496 So. 2d 818, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 548
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 30, 1986 | Docket: 1522747
Cited 5 times | Published
an order "declining to dismiss charges under Rule 3.213(b) against a defendant who indisputably must
Category: Criminal Procedure
982 So. 2d 756, 2008 WL 2261539
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 4, 2008 | Docket: 1199923
Cited 4 times | Published
may find it appropriate to consider amending Rule 3.213 to reflect such a distinction."). Section 916
Category: Criminal Procedure
837 So. 2d 533, 2003 WL 289001
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 12, 2003 | Docket: 1527452
Cited 4 times | Published
were dismissed without prejudice pursuant to rule 3.213(a); and (3) because Offill had been conditionally
Category: Criminal Procedure
942 So. 2d 407, 2006 WL 3229930
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 9, 2006 | Docket: 1471518
Cited 3 times | Published
amendment addresses the issue presented by Capuzzo.
Rule 3.213, Continuing Incompetency to Proceed, Except Incompetency
Category: Criminal Procedure
642 So. 2d 23, 1994 WL 406142
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 5, 1994 | Docket: 549840
Cited 3 times | Published
competent to proceed in the future." See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.213(a). Accordingly, there is nothing "permanent"
Category: Criminal Procedure
178 So. 3d 928, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 16711, 2015 WL 6757300
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 6, 2015 | Docket: 60251630
Cited 2 times | Published
competent to proceed in the .future-. . .
Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.213(a)(2).
The order denying Henry’s motion
Category: Criminal Procedure
137 So. 3d 1133, 2014 WL 1304724, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 4823
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 2, 2014 | Docket: 60240187
Cited 2 times | Published
either be civilly committed or released. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.213(a)(1). On the other hand,
[i]f the incompetency
Category: Criminal Procedure
834 So. 2d 872, 2002 WL 31373628
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 23, 2002 | Docket: 2583639
Cited 2 times | Published
may find it appropriate to consider amending Rule 3.213 to reflect such a distinction.
DENIED.
BENTON
Category: Criminal Procedure
265 So. 3d 494
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 4, 2018 | Docket: 7982207
Cited 1 times | Published
circumstance to grant an extension.
In regard to rule 3.213 (Continuing Incompetency to Proceed, Except Incompetency
Category: Criminal Procedure
132 So. 3d 123, 38 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 890, 2013 WL 6500885, 2013 Fla. LEXIS 2685
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 12, 2013 | Docket: 60238356
Cited 1 times | Published
Change]
(d) [No Change]
Committee Notes
[No Change]
RULE 3.213. CONTINUING INCOMPETENCY TO PROCEED, EXCEPT INCOMPETENCY
Category: Criminal Procedure
95 So. 3d 1037, 2012 WL 3758658, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 14632
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 27, 2012 | Docket: 60311062
Cited 1 times | Published
since Petitioner was found incompetent. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.213(a)(1). We agree with the State on both issues
Category: Criminal Procedure
707 So. 2d 1165, 1998 WL 88372
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 4, 1998 | Docket: 1676006
Cited 1 times | Published
been dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 3.213(b), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. We deny
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 17, 2022 | Docket: 64898831
Published
a motion to dismiss in each case pursuant
to rule 3.213(a)(1). The trial court acknowledged at the hearing
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 21, 2021 | Docket: 60073807
Published
a court-ordered competency evaluation before rule 3.213’s one-
year time limit ran, we deny the petition
Category: Criminal Procedure
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 3, 2020 | Docket: 17218379
Published
competent to
proceed in the future.
Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.213(a) (2019).
The State relies on State
Category: Criminal Procedure
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 19, 2018 | Docket: 7471972
Published
circumstance to grant an extension.
In regard to rule 3.213 (Continuing Incompetency to Proceed, Except
Category: Criminal Procedure
228 So. 3d 727, 2017 WL 4844921
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 27, 2017 | Docket: 60279915
Published
defendant because the order was premature. Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.213(a)(1); State v. Carey, 212 So.3d 448 (Fla
Category: Criminal Procedure
212 So. 3d 448, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 209
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 11, 2017 | Docket: 4565892
Published
dismissal of the criminal action. We agree.
Rule 3.213(a)(1) generally provides that charges “shall”
Category: Criminal Procedure
200 So. 3d 1296, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 14829, 2016 WL 5845694
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 5, 2016 | Docket: 4469182
Published
mental illness.
See
§ 916.145; Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.213(a)(1);
State v. Benninghoff,
Category: Criminal Procedure
188 So. 3d 64, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 4521, 2016 WL 1129917
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 23, 2016 | Docket: 3046936
Published
2015 The defendant moves to dismiss, pursuant to rule 3.213(b) and
Jackson v. Indiana,
406 U.S
Category: Criminal Procedure
164 So. 3d 1257, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 8570, 2015 WL 3510309
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 5, 2015 | Docket: 60247918
Published
meets the criteria for commitment. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.213(b). If the defendant remains incompetent
Category: Criminal Procedure
79 So. 3d 783, 2011 WL 6184469
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 14, 2011 | Docket: 60305381
Published
his attorney filed a motion to dismiss under rule 3.213(b), which states, in pertinent part:
If at any
Category: Criminal Procedure
949 So. 2d 1059, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 51, 2007 WL 5784
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 3, 2007 | Docket: 64849489
Published
meet the criteria for commitment,.... ” Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.213(a). In a subsection “(a)” release, the charges
Category: Criminal Procedure
829 So. 2d 252, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 12775, 2002 WL 2009793
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 4, 2002 | Docket: 64818564
Published
chapters 394 and 916, Florida Statutes (2001), and rule 3.213, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure (2001),
Category: Criminal Procedure
794 So. 2d 457, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 2556, 2000 WL 1637548
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 2, 2000 | Docket: 64808411
Published
“notice of expiration of speedy trial time.”
RULE 3.213. CONTINUING INCOMPETENCY TO PROCEED, EXCEPT INCOMPETENCY
Category: Criminal Procedure
651 So. 2d 1227, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 2047, 1995 WL 85166
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 3, 1995 | Docket: 64755029
Published
removed from the state the opportunity granted by rule 3.213(a) to refile the charges should the appellee
Category: Criminal Procedure
513 So. 2d 701, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2167, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 12154
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 8, 1987 | Docket: 64629934
Published
dismiss the indictment against him pursuant to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.213(b). For the reasons which follow, we deny
Category: Criminal Procedure
474 So. 2d 394, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1993, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15553
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 20, 1985 | Docket: 64613711
Published
as here, declining to dismiss charges under Rule 3.213(b) against a defendant who indisputably must
Category: Criminal Procedure
455 So. 2d 1112
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 18, 1984 | Docket: 64606809
Published
be considered for the remedies provided under Rule 3.213(b) Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, said
Category: Criminal Procedure
453 So. 2d 199, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14238
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 25, 1984 | Docket: 64606052
Published
regime were instituted. However, the test under Rule 3.213(b) is whether there is a substantial probability
Category: Criminal Procedure
443 So. 2d 188, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 25192
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 13, 1983 | Docket: 64601940
Published
this case from Garrett v. State, 390 So.2d 95.
Rule 3.213 sets an outer limit for holding a person on a
Category: Criminal Procedure
389 So. 2d 610, 1980 Fla. LEXIS 4378
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 18, 1980 | Docket: 64578555
Published
defendants adjudicated incompetent to stand trial.
RULE 3.213: CONTINUING INCOMPETENCY TO STAND TRIAL: DISPOSITION
Category: Criminal Procedure