Florida Appellate Rule 9.180 - APPEAL PROCEEDINGS TO REVIEW WORKERS’ | Syfert Law

Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448

Florida Appellate Rule 9.180

RULE 9.180. APPEAL PROCEEDINGS TO REVIEW WORKERS’
COMPENSATION CASES


(a) Applicability. Appellate review of proceedings in workers’
compensation cases will be as in civil cases except as specifically
modified in this rule.

(b) Jurisdiction.

(1) Appeal. The First District Court of Appeal (the court)
must review by appeal any final order, as well as any nonfinal order
of a lower tribunal that adjudicates:

(A) jurisdiction;

(B) venue; or

(C) compensability, provided that the order
expressly finds an injury occurred within the scope and course of
employment and that claimant is entitled to receive causally related
benefits in some amount, and provided further that the lower
tribunal certifies in the order that determination of the exact nature
and amount of benefits due to claimant will require substantial
expense and time.

(2) Waiver of Review; Abbreviated Final Orders. Unless
a request for findings of fact and conclusions of law is timely filed,
review by appeal of an abbreviated final order will be deemed
waived. The filing of a timely request tolls the time within which an
abbreviated final order becomes final or an appeal may be filed.

(3) Commencement. Jurisdiction of the court under this
rule must be invoked by filing a notice of appeal with the clerk of
the lower tribunal within 30 days of the date the lower tribunal
sends to the parties the order to be reviewed either by mail or by
electronic means approved by the deputy chief judge, which date
will be the date of rendition.
(4) Notice of Appeal. The notice must be substantially in
the form prescribed by rule 9.900(a) or (c), and must contain a brief
summary of the type of benefits affected, including a statement
setting forth the time periods involved which must be substantially
in the following form:

I hereby certify that this appeal affects only the following periods
and classifications of benefits and medical treatment:

1. Compensation for .....(TTD, TPD, wage loss,
impairment benefits, PTD, funeral benefits, or death benefits).....
from .....(date)..... to .....(date)......

2. Medical benefits.

3. Rehabilitation.

4. Reimbursement from the SDTF for benefits paid
from .....(date)..... to .....(date)......

5. Contribution for benefits paid from .....(date)..... to
.....(date)......

(c) Jurisdiction of Lower Tribunal.

(1) Substantive Issues. The lower tribunal retains
jurisdiction to decide the issues that have not been adjudicated and
are not the subject of pending appellate review.

(2) Settlement. At any time before the record on appeal
is transmitted to the court, the lower tribunal will have the
authority to approve settlements or correct clerical errors in the
order appealed.

(3) Relinquishment of Jurisdiction by Court to Consider
Settlement. If, after the record on appeal is transmitted, settlement
is reached, the parties must file a joint motion stating that a
settlement has been reached and requesting relinquishment of
jurisdiction to the lower tribunal for any necessary approval of the
settlement. The court may relinquish jurisdiction for a specified
period for entry of an appropriate order. In the event the Division of
Workers’ Compensation has advanced the costs of preparing the
record on appeal or the filing fee, a copy of the joint motion must be
furnished to the Division of Workers’ Compensation by the
appellant.

(A) Notice. On or before the date specified in the
order relinquishing jurisdiction, the parties must file a joint notice
of disposition of the settlement with a conformed copy of any order
entered on the settlement.

(B) Costs. Any order approving a settlement must
provide where appropriate for the assessment and recovery of
appellate costs, including any costs incurred by the Division of
Workers’ Compensation for insolvent appellants.

(d) Benefits Affected. Benefits specifically referenced in the
notice of appeal may be withheld as provided by law pending the
outcome of the appeal. Otherwise, benefits awarded must be paid
as required by law.

(1) Abandonment. If the appellant or cross-appellant
fails to argue entitlement to benefits set forth in the notice of appeal
in the appellant’s or cross-appellant’s initial brief, the challenge to
such benefits will be deemed abandoned. If there is a dispute as to
whether a challenge to certain benefits has been abandoned, the
court upon motion will make that determination.

(2) Payments of Benefits When Challenged Benefits Are
Abandoned. When benefits challenged on appeal have been
abandoned under subdivision (d)(1) above, benefits no longer
affected by the appeal are payable within 30 days of the service of
the brief together with interest as required under section 440.20,
Florida Statutes, from the date of the order of the lower tribunal
making the award.

(3) Payment of Benefits After Appeal. If benefits are
ordered paid by the court on completion of the appeal, they must be
paid, together with interest as required under section 440.20,
Florida Statutes, within 30 days after the court’s mandate. If the
order of the court is appealed to the supreme court, benefits
determined due by the court may be stayed in accordance with rule
9.310. Benefits ordered paid by the supreme court must be paid
within 30 days of the court’s mandate.

(e) Intervention by Division of Workers’ Compensation.

(1) District Court of Appeal. Within 30 days of the date
of filing a notice or petition invoking the jurisdiction of the court the
Division of Workers’ Compensation may intervene by filing a notice
of intervention as a party appellant/petitioner or
appellee/respondent with the court and take positions on any
relevant matters.

(2) Supreme Court of Florida. If review of an order of the
court is sought in the supreme court, the Division of Workers’
Compensation may intervene in accordance with these rules. The
clerk of the supreme court must provide a copy of the pertinent
documents to the Division of Workers’ Compensation.

(3) Division of Workers’ Compensation Not a Party Until
Notice to Intervene Is Filed. Until the notice of intervention is filed,
the Division of Workers’ Compensation will not be considered a
party.

(f) Record Contents; Final Orders.

(1) Transcript; Order; Other Documents. The record
must contain the claim(s) or petition(s) for benefits, notice(s) of
denial, pretrial stipulation, pretrial order, trial memoranda,
depositions or exhibits admitted into evidence, any motion for
rehearing and response, order on motion for rehearing, transcripts
of any hearings before the lower tribunal, and the order appealed.
The parties may designate other items for inclusion in or omission
from the record in accordance with rule 9.200.

(2) Proffered Evidence. Evidence proffered but not
introduced into evidence at the hearing will not be considered
unless its admissibility is an issue on appeal and the question is
properly designated for inclusion in the record by a party.

(3) Certification; Transmission. The lower tribunal must
certify and transmit the record to the court as prescribed by these
rules.

(4) Stipulated Record. The parties may stipulate to the
contents of the record. In such a case the record will consist of the
stipulated statement and the order appealed which the lower
tribunal must certify as the record on appeal.

(5) Costs.

(A) Notice of Estimated Costs. Within 5 days after
the contents of the record have been determined under these rules,
the lower tribunal must notify the appellant of the estimated cost of
preparing the record. The lower tribunal also must notify the
Division of Workers’ Compensation of the estimated record costs if
the appellant files a verified petition to be relieved of costs and a
sworn financial affidavit.

(B) Deposit of Estimated Costs. Within 15 days
after the notice of estimated costs is served, the appellant must
deposit a sum of money equal to the estimated costs with the lower
tribunal.

(C) Failure to Deposit Costs. If the appellant fails
to deposit the estimated costs within the time prescribed, the lower
tribunal must notify the court, which may dismiss the appeal.

(D) State Agencies; Waiver of Costs. Any self-
insured state agency or branch of state government, including the
Division of Workers’ Compensation and the Special Disability Trust
Fund, need not deposit the estimated costs.

(E) Costs. If additional costs are incurred in
correcting, amending, or supplementing the record, the lower
tribunal must assess such costs against the appropriate party. If
the Division of Workers’ Compensation is obligated to pay the costs
of the appeal due to the appellant’s indigency, it must be given
notice of any proceeding to assess additional costs. Within 15 days
after the entry of the order assessing costs, the assessed party must
deposit the sums so ordered with the lower tribunal. The lower
tribunal must promptly notify the court if costs are not deposited as
required.

(6) Transcript(s) of Proceedings.

(A) Selection of Court Reporter by Lower Tribunal.
The deputy chief judge of compensation claims will select a court
reporter or a transcriptionist to transcribe any hearing(s). The
deputy chief judge who makes the selection must give the parties
notice of the selection.

(B) Objection to Court Reporter or Transcriptionist
Selected. Any party may object to the court reporter or
transcriptionist selected by filing written objections with the judge
who made the selection within 15 days after service of notice of the
selection. Within 5 days after filing the objection, the judge must
hold a hearing on the issue. In such a case, the time limits
mandated by these rules will be appropriately extended.

(C) Certification of Transcript by Court Reporter or
Transcriptionist. The court reporter or transcriptionist selected by
the deputy chief judge of compensation claims must certify and
deliver an electronic version of the transcript(s) to the clerk of the
office of the judges of compensation claims. The transcript(s) must
be delivered in sufficient time for the clerk of the office of the judges
of compensation claims to incorporate transcript(s) in the record.
The court reporter or transcriptionist must promptly notify all
parties in writing when the transcript(s) is delivered to the clerk of
the office of the judges of compensation claims.

(7) Preparation; Certification; Transmission of the
Record. The deputy chief judge of compensation claims must
designate the person to prepare the record. The clerk of the office of
the judges of compensation claims must supervise the preparation
of the record. The record must be transmitted to the lower tribunal
in sufficient time for the lower tribunal to review the record and
transmit it to the court. The lower tribunal must review the original
record, certify that it was prepared in accordance with these rules,
and within 60 days of the notice of appeal being filed transmit the
record to the court. The lower tribunal must provide Portable
Document Format (“PDF”) file of the record to all counsel of record
and all unrepresented parties.

(8) Extensions. For good cause, the lower tribunal may
extend by no more than 30 days the time for filing the record with
the court. Any further extension of time may be granted by the
court.

(9) Applicability of Rule 9.200. Rules 9.200(a)(3), (c), (d),
and (f) apply to preparation of the record in appeals under this rule.

(g) Relief From Filing Fee and Cost; Indigency.

(1) Indigency Defined. Indigency for the purpose of this
rule is synonymous with insolvency as defined by section 440.02,
Florida Statutes.

(2) Filing Fee.

(A) Authority. An appellant may be relieved of
paying filing fees by filing a verified petition or motion of indigency
under section 57.081(1), Florida Statutes, with the lower tribunal.

(B) Time. The verified petition or motion of
indigency must be filed with the lower tribunal together with the
notice of appeal.

(C) Verified Petition; Contents. The verified
petition or motion must contain a statement by the appellant to be
relieved of paying filing fees due to indigency and the appellant’s
inability to pay the charges. The petition must request that the
lower tribunal enter an order or certificate of indigency. One of the
following must also be filed in support of the verified petition or
motion:
(i) If the appellant is unrepresented by
counsel, a financial affidavit; or

(ii) If the appellant is represented by counsel,
counsel must certify that counsel has investigated:

a. the appellant’s financial condition
and finds the appellant indigent; and

b. the nature of appellant’s position
and believes it to be meritorious as a matter of law.

Counsel must also certify that counsel has not been paid or
promised payment of a fee or other remuneration for such legal
services except for the amount, if any, ultimately approved by the
lower tribunal to be paid by the employer/carrier if such
entitlement is determined by the court.

(D) Service. The appellant must serve a copy of the
verified petition or motion of indigency, including the appellant’s
financial affidavit or counsel’s certificate, whichever is applicable,
on all interested parties and the clerk of the court.

(E) Order or Certificate of Indigency. The lower
tribunal must review the verified petition or motion for indigency
and supporting documents without a hearing, and if the lower
tribunal finds compliance with section 57.081(1), Florida Statutes,
may issue a certificate of indigency or enter an order granting said
relief, at which time the appellant may proceed without further
application to the court and without payment of any filing fees. If
the lower tribunal enters an order denying relief, the appellant must
deposit the filing fee with the lower tribunal within 15 days from the
date of the order unless timely review is sought by motion filed with
the court.

(3) Costs of Preparation of Record.

(A) Authority. An appellant may be relieved in
whole or in part from the costs of the preparation of the record on
appeal by filing with the lower tribunal a verified petition to be
relieved of costs and a copy of the designation of the record on
appeal. The verified petition to be relieved of costs must contain a
sworn financial affidavit as described in subdivision (g)(3)(D).

(B) Time. The verified petition to be relieved of
costs must be filed within 15 days after service of the notice of
estimated costs. A verified petition filed before the date of service of
the notice of estimated costs will be deemed not timely.

(C) Verified Petition; Contents. The verified
petition must contain a request by the appellant to be relieved of
costs due to insolvency. The petition also must include a statement
by the appellant’s attorney or the appellant, if not represented by an
attorney, that the appeal was filed in good faith and the court
reasonably could find reversible error in the record and must state
with particularity the specific legal and factual grounds for that
opinion.

(D) Sworn Financial Affidavit; Contents. With the
verified petition to be relieved of costs, the appellant must file a
sworn financial affidavit listing income and assets, including
marital income and assets, and expenses and liabilities.

(E) Verified Petition and Sworn Financial Affidavit;
Service. The appellant must serve a copy of the verified petition to
be relieved of costs, including the sworn financial affidavit, on all
interested parties, including the Division of Workers’ Compensation,
the office of general counsel of the Department of Financial
Services, and the clerk of the court.

(F) Hearing on Petition to Be Relieved of Costs.
After giving 15 days’ notice to the Division of Workers’
Compensation and all parties, the lower tribunal must promptly
hold a hearing and rule on the merits of the petition to be relieved
of costs. However, if no objection to the petition is filed by the
division or a party within 20 days after the petition is served, the
lower tribunal may enter an order on the merits of the petition
without a hearing.
(G) Extension of Appeal Deadlines. If the petition
to be relieved of the entire cost of the preparation of the record on
appeal is granted, the 60-day period allowed under these rules for
the preparation of the record will begin to run from the date of the
order granting the petition. If the petition to be relieved of the cost
of the record is denied or only granted in part, the petitioner must
deposit the estimated costs with the lower tribunal, or file a motion
requesting a determination of indigency, within 15 days from the
date the order denying the petition is entered. The 60-day period
allowed under these rules for the preparation of the record will
begin from the date the estimated cost is deposited with the lower
tribunal. If the petition to be relieved of the cost of the record is
withdrawn before ruling, then the petitioner must deposit the
estimated costs with the lower tribunal at the time the petition is
withdrawn and the 60-day period for preparation of the record will
begin to run from the date the petition is withdrawn.

(H) Payment of Cost for Preparation of Record by
Administration Trust Fund. If the petition to be relieved of costs is
granted, the lower tribunal may order the Workers’ Compensation
Administration Trust Fund to pay the cost of the preparation of the
record on appeal pending the final disposition of the appeal. The
lower tribunal must provide a copy of such order to all interested
parties, including the division, general counsel of the Department of
Financial Services, and the clerk of the court.

(I) Reimbursement of Administration Trust Fund
If Appeal Is Successful. If the Administration Trust Fund has paid
the costs of the preparation of the record and the appellant prevails
at the conclusion of the appeal, the appellee must reimburse the
fund the costs paid within 30 days of the mandate issued by the
court or supreme court under these rules.

(h) Briefs and Motions Directed to Briefs.

(1) Briefs; Final Order Appeals. Within 30 days after the
lower tribunal certifies the record to the court, the appellant must
serve the initial brief. Additional briefs must be served as prescribed
by rule 9.210.
(2) Briefs; Nonfinal Appeals. The appellant’s initial brief,
accompanied by an appendix as prescribed by rule 9.220, must be
served within 15 days of filing the notice. Additional briefs must be
served as prescribed by rule 9.210.

(3) Motions to Strike. Motions to strike a brief or
portions of a brief will not be entertained by the court. However, a
party, in its own brief, may call to the court’s attention a breach of
these rules. If no further responsive brief is authorized,
noncompliance may be brought to the court’s attention by filing a
suggestion of noncompliance. Statements in briefs not supported by
the record will be disregarded and may constitute cause for
imposition of sanctions.

(i) Attorneys’ Fees and Appellate Costs.

(1) Costs. Appellate costs must be taxed as provided by
law. Taxable costs will include those items listed in rule 9.400 and
costs for a transcript included in an appendix as part of an appeal
of a nonfinal order.

(2) Attorneys’ Fees. A motion for attorneys’ fees must
be served in accordance with rule 9.400(b).

(3) Entitlement and Amount of Fees and Costs. If the
court determines that an appellate fee is due, the lower tribunal will
have jurisdiction to conduct hearings and consider evidence
regarding the amount of the attorneys’ fee and costs due at any
time after the mandate, if applicable, or the final order or opinion
disposing of the case is issued, whichever is later.

(4) Review. Review will be in accordance with rule
9.400(c).

Committee Notes

1996 Adoption. Rule 9.180 is intended to supersede rules
4.160, 4.161, 4.165, 4.166, 4.170, 4.180, 4.190, 4.220, 4.225,
4.230, 4.240, 4.250, 4.260, 4.265, 4.270, and 4.280 of the Rules of
Workers’ Compensation Procedure. In consolidating those rules into
one rule and incorporating them into the Rules of Appellate
Procedure, duplicative rules have been eliminated. The change was
not intended to change the general nature of workers’ compensation
appeals. It is contemplated there still may be multiple “final orders.”
See 1980 Committee Note, Fla. R. Work. Comp. P. 4.160.

The orders listed in rules 9.180(b)(1)(A), (B), and (C) are the
only nonfinal orders appealable before entry of a final order in
workers’ compensation cases.

Rule 9.180(b)(2) now limits the place for filing the notice of
appeal to the lower tribunal that entered the order and not any
judge of compensation claims as the former rule provided.

Rule 9.180(f)(6)(E) provides that the lower tribunal shall
provide a copy of the record to all counsel of record and all
unrepresented parties. It is contemplated that the lower tribunal
can accomplish that in whatever manner the lower tribunal deems
most convenient for itself, such as, having copies available that
counsel or the parties may pick up.

2011 Amendments. Subdivision (b)(4) was amended to
provide for the use of form 9.900(c) in appeal of non-final orders.

Subdivisions (f)(6) and (f)(7) were amended to conform to
section 440.29(2), Florida Statutes, providing that the deputy chief
judge, not the lower tribunal, is authorized to designate the manner
in which hearings are recorded and arrange for the preparation of
records on appeal. Moreover, it provides statewide uniformity and
consistency in the preparation of records on appeal by
incorporating electronic and other technological means to promote
efficiency and cost reduction. Currently the electronic version of the
transcript is the Portable Document Format (PDF).

Cases Citing Rule 9.180

Total Results: 114

Citizens Property Insurance Corp. v. San Perdido Ass'n

104 So. 3d 344, 37 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 691, 2012 WL 5517204, 2012 Fla. LEXIS 2354

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 15, 2012 | Docket: 60227457

Cited 96 times | Published

rights claim arising under federal law.” Fla. R.App. P. 9.180(a)(3)(C)(vii). The Court next addressed

Category: Appellate Procedure

Amend. to Fla. Rules of Appellate Proc.

685 So. 2d 773, 1996 WL 673822

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 26, 1996 | Docket: 1414934

Cited 65 times | Published

workers' compensation appellate rules into proposed rule 9.180. Workers' compensation is an area of the law

Category: Appellate Procedure

Amend. to Fla. Rules of Appellate Proc.

696 So. 2d 1103, 1996 WL 908661

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 26, 1996 | Docket: 2037954

Cited 51 times | Published

workers' compensation appellate rules into proposed rule 9.180. Workers' compensation is an area of the law

Category: Appellate Procedure

Amend. to Fla. Rules of Appellate Proc.

780 So. 2d 834, 2000 WL 1508541

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 12, 2000 | Docket: 1298753

Cited 19 times | Published

transmitted to the court from the lower tribunal. RULE 9.180. APPEAL PROCEEDINGS TO REVIEW WORKERS' COMPENSATION

Category: Appellate Procedure

Balmoral Condominium Ass'n v. Grimaldi

107 So. 3d 1149, 2013 WL 238203, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 829

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 23, 2013 | Docket: 60228568

Cited 15 times | Published

appealed is non-final, we have jurisdiction. Fla. R.App. P. 9.180(5). II. The resolution of this matter turns

Category: Appellate Procedure

Amendments to the Florida Rules of Workers' Compensation Procedure

891 So. 2d 474, 29 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 734, 2004 Fla. LEXIS 2168, 2004 WL 2810829

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 2, 2004 | Docket: 64835462

Cited 9 times | Published

from workers' compensation proceedings. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.180(b)(1). Because the First District Court

Category: Appellate Procedure

Cadco Builders, Inc. v. Roberts

712 So. 2d 457, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 7163, 1998 WL 316641

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 17, 1998 | Docket: 1471412

Cited 7 times | Published

will require substantial expense and time. Thus, Rule 9.180(b)(1)(C) provides that the lower tribunal, in

Category: Appellate Procedure

In Re RB

890 So. 2d 1288, 2005 WL 120499

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 21, 2005 | Docket: 1291793

Cited 6 times | Published

previously had been governed by rule 9.110. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.180 (addressing workers' compensation); Fla

Category: Appellate Procedure

Broward Children's Center, Inc. v. Hall

859 So. 2d 623, 2003 WL 22799491

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 26, 2003 | Docket: 1284677

Cited 6 times | Published

jurisdiction. Fla. Const. art. V, § 4(b)(1); Fla. R.App. P. 9.180(b)(1)(C). See generally Cadco Builders,

Category: Appellate Procedure

Universal Underwriters Insurance Co. v. Stathopoulos

113 So. 3d 957, 2013 WL 645914, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 2934

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 22, 2013 | Docket: 60231668

Cited 5 times | Published

whether we may exercise jurisdiction pursuant to rule 9.180, governing appeals from nonfinal orders; none

Category: Appellate Procedure

Troche v. BJ's Wholesale Club, Inc.

954 So. 2d 685, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 5552, 2007 WL 1108534

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 16, 2007 | Docket: 158688

Cited 5 times | Published

Appeals Comm'n, 461 So.2d 208 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984). Rule 9.180(b)(3) provides that jurisdiction shall be invoked

Category: Appellate Procedure

Joseph Shannon v. Cheney Brothers Inc. & The Travelers

157 So. 3d 397, 2015 WL 404127

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 29, 2015 | Docket: 2629734

Cited 4 times | Published

compensability. § 440.25(5)(a), Fla. Stat; Fla. R. App. P. 9.180(b)(1). To invoke the court’s appellate jurisdiction

Category: Appellate Procedure

Landry v. AMS Staff Leasing

993 So. 2d 1071, 2008 WL 2662592

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 9, 2008 | Docket: 1489348

Cited 4 times | Published

did not include the certification required by rule 9.180(b)(1)(C)). All pending motions are denied as

Category: Appellate Procedure

Amendments to Rules of Appellate Procedure

941 So. 2d 352, 31 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 732, 2006 Fla. LEXIS 2544, 2006 WL 3025623

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 26, 2006 | Docket: 299199

Cited 4 times | Published

may be appealed only if listed in rule 9.130. RULE 9.180. APPEAL PROCEEDINGS TO REVIEW WORKERS' COMPENSATION

Category: Appellate Procedure

CHUBB GROUP INSURANCE COMPANY v. Easthagen

889 So. 2d 112, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 17754, 2004 WL 2726143

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 23, 2004 | Docket: 89878

Cited 4 times | Published

[1] This court has jurisdiction pursuant to rule 9.180(b)(1)(A), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure

Category: Appellate Procedure

Wausau Ins. Co. v. Tillman

765 So. 2d 123, 2000 WL 775600

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 19, 2000 | Docket: 428796

Cited 4 times | Published

were compensable. We have jurisdiction. Fla. R.App. P. 9.180(b)(1)(C). Because the claimant's alleged

Category: Appellate Procedure

In RE: AMENDMENTS TO the FLORIDA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, the Florida Rules of Judicial Administration, the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, and the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure-Electronic Service.

257 So. 3d 66

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 25, 2018 | Docket: 8081303

Cited 3 times | Published

later. Committee Notes [No change] RULE 9.180. APPEAL PROCEEDINGS TO REVIEW WORKERS' COMPENSATION

Category: Appellate Procedure

Department of Revenue v. Groman

46 So. 3d 1058, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 15586, 2010 WL 4025117

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 15, 2010 | Docket: 2400677

Cited 3 times | Published

"adjudicates jurisdiction," and thus falls under Rule 9.180(b)(1)(A), neither the order on appeal, nor Appellants'

Category: Appellate Procedure

Patco Transport, Inc. v. Estupinan

917 So. 2d 922, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 19675, 2005 WL 3404387

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 14, 2005 | Docket: 448034

Cited 3 times | Published

will require substantial expense and time." Fla. R.App. P. 9.180(b)(1)(C) (2004). [3] The general release

Category: Appellate Procedure

In re Amendments to the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure

102 So. 3d 451, 37 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 638, 2012 Fla. LEXIS 2063, 2012 WL 4936363

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 18, 2012 | Docket: 60226665

Cited 2 times | Published

(c)-(j) [No Change] *488Committee Notes [No Change] RULE 9.180. APPEAL PROCEEDINGS TO REVIEW WORKERS’ COMPENSATION

Category: Appellate Procedure

LIFE CARE CENTER OF WINTER HAVEN v. Benjamin

22 So. 3d 152, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 18200, 2009 WL 4111225

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 30, 2009 | Docket: 1639701

Cited 2 times | Published

and the E/C's appeal is DISMISSED. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.180(1); see also Martin County Bd. of County

Category: Appellate Procedure

City of Fort Lauderdale v. St. Louis

917 So. 2d 224, 2005 WL 3179405

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 30, 2005 | Docket: 1227940

Cited 2 times | Published

time. Thus, we have jurisdiction pursuant to rule 9.180(b)(1)(C), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure

Category: Appellate Procedure

Dayan v. HI Development/Holiday Inn

710 So. 2d 187, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 4758, 1998 WL 204907

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 29, 1998 | Docket: 2565354

Cited 2 times | Published

timely filed in the lower tribunal as required by rule 9.180(b)(2). Appellant files a response to the order

Category: Appellate Procedure

In RE: AMENDMENTS TO the FLORIDA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE-2017 REGULAR-CYCLE REPORT.

256 So. 3d 1218

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 25, 2018 | Docket: 8081305

Cited 1 times | Published

220. (d) - (e) [No Change] RULE 9.180. APPEAL PROCEEDINGS TO REVIEW WORKERS' COMPENSATION

Category: Appellate Procedure

Ake v. United States Sugar Corp.

112 So. 3d 171, 2013 WL 1923842, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 7601

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 10, 2013 | Docket: 60231012

Cited 1 times | Published

rendition of this order, is untimely. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.180(b)(3). We therefore dismiss this appeal

Category: Appellate Procedure

Aten v. DELL AIR HEATING

81 So. 3d 643, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 4099, 2012 WL 833094

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 14, 2012 | Docket: 60225

Cited 1 times | Published

order, without disposing of the claim. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.180(b)(1); Green Tree Servicing, LLC v. Genaux

Category: Appellate Procedure

DEPENA v. Molina

79 So. 3d 946, 2012 WL 580570, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 2938

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 23, 2012 | Docket: 1119830

Cited 1 times | Published

is a non-appealable, nonfinal order. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.180(b)(1). Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED

Category: Appellate Procedure

Jean v. MIAMI JEWISH HOME

78 So. 3d 639, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 19766, 2011 WL 6141032

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 9, 2011 | Docket: 2575439

Cited 1 times | Published

to the parties" unless timely appealed); Fla. R.App. P. 9.180(b)(3) (providing this court's jurisdiction

Category: Appellate Procedure

In re Amendments to the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure

84 So. 3d 192, 2011 Fla. LEXIS 3036, 2011 WL 7758579

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 3, 2011 | Docket: 60306681

Cited 1 times | Published

notice is timely filed as to each such order. RULE 9.180. APPEAL PROCEEDINGS TO REVIEW WORKERS’ COMPENSATION

Category: Appellate Procedure

CIRCLE F DUDE RANCH CAMP v. Huff

69 So. 3d 1074, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 15035, 2011 WL 4398164

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 22, 2011 | Docket: 2568038

Cited 1 times | Published

this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.180(b)(1)(C). See also, e.g., Landry v. AMS

Category: Appellate Procedure

Hillsborough County Aviation Authority v. Cesiro

61 So. 3d 1292, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 8108, 2011 WL 2154743

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 2, 2011 | Docket: 60300452

Cited 1 times | Published

this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.180(b)(1)(C). See also, e.g., Landry v. AMS

Category: Appellate Procedure

Valdes v. BARRY UNIVERSITY

43 So. 3d 823, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 12396, 2010 WL 3328257

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 25, 2010 | Docket: 2537499

Cited 1 times | Published

from a non-appealable, non-final order. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.180(b)(1). Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED

Category: Appellate Procedure

Valdes v. BARRY UNIVERSITY

43 So. 3d 823, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 12396, 2010 WL 3328257

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 25, 2010 | Docket: 2537499

Cited 1 times | Published

from a non-appealable, non-final order. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.180(b)(1). Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED

Category: Appellate Procedure

Bocelli v. Southwest Florida Investments

37 So. 3d 964, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 8931, 2010 WL 2472186

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 21, 2010 | Docket: 1240401

Cited 1 times | Published

is a non-appealable, non-final order. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.180(b)(1); Garcia v. New In*965dus. Techniques

Category: Appellate Procedure

Holmes v. BROWN, TERRELL, HOGAN, ELLIS

36 So. 3d 919, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 8171, 2010 WL 2292911

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 9, 2010 | Docket: 2584341

Cited 1 times | Published

to the parties" unless timely appealed); Fla. R.App. P. 9.180(b)(3) (providing this court's jurisdiction

Category: Appellate Procedure

McPherson v. Ground Zero

34 So. 3d 195, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 6217, 2010 WL 1793881

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 6, 2010 | Docket: 2569684

Cited 1 times | Published

is a non-appealable, non-final order. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.180(b)(1). Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED

Category: Appellate Procedure

Verly v. Orange county/female Detention Center

30 So. 3d 720, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 4177, 2010 WL 1351721

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 31, 2010 | Docket: 2563722

Cited 1 times | Published

is a non-appealable, non-final order. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.180(b)(1); Fla. Retail Fed'n Self-Insured Fund

Category: Appellate Procedure

CONTINENTAL FLORIDA MATERIAL, INC. v. Ramos

29 So. 3d 455, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 2931, 2010 WL 816180

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 10, 2010 | Docket: 185565

Cited 1 times | Published

from a non-appealable, non-final order. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.180(b)(1). Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED

Category: Appellate Procedure

Maradriaga v. 7-ELEVEN

29 So. 3d 440, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 2927, 2010 WL 796364

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 10, 2010 | Docket: 2585218

Cited 1 times | Published

this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.180(b)(1). See also Fla. Retail Fed'n Self-Insured

Category: Appellate Procedure

City of Lakeland v. HENRY-JACKSON

28 So. 3d 186, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 2093, 2010 WL 624161

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 24, 2010 | Docket: 1411020

Cited 1 times | Published

this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.180(b)(1)(C). See also, e.g., Landry v. AMS

Category: Appellate Procedure

Special Disability Trust Fund v. MIAMI AIRPORT HILTON

24 So. 3d 702, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 19991, 2009 WL 4912630

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 22, 2009 | Docket: 1451862

Cited 1 times | Published

a non-appealable, non-final order. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.180(b)(1); Mintz v. Broward Corr. Inst., 800

Category: Appellate Procedure

Gonzalez v. WALGREENS

24 So. 3d 701, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 19985, 2009 WL 4912616

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 22, 2009 | Docket: 1261080

Cited 1 times | Published

is a non-appealable, non-final order. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.180(b)(1), Mintz v. Broward Corr. Inst., 800

Category: Appellate Procedure

CONCRETE STRUCTURES, INC. v. Iglesias

1 So. 3d 1289, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1489, 2009 WL 439833

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 24, 2009 | Docket: 308539

Cited 1 times | Published

DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.180(b)(1)(C); Sun Sentinel & Tribune Co. v.

Category: Appellate Procedure

Wibbens v. State, Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles, Bureau of Driver Improvement

956 So. 2d 503, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 5769, 2007 WL 1146610

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 19, 2007 | Docket: 64850673

Cited 1 times | Published

rendition in workers' compensation proceedings. Fla. R.App. P. 9.180(b)(3).

Category: Appellate Procedure

Bowe v. McDONALD'S

933 So. 2d 71, 2006 WL 1419379

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 25, 2006 | Docket: 1712292

Cited 1 times | Published

the Florida Supreme Court by its adoption of rule 9.180(b)(2) reasonably intended to divest a JCC from

Category: Appellate Procedure

Amendments to the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure

858 So. 2d 1013, 28 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 797, 2003 Fla. LEXIS 1779, 2003 WL 22410375

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 23, 2003 | Docket: 64826361

Cited 1 times | Published

the method prescribed in this rule or that in rule 9.180. Amended March 27, 1980, effective April 1, 1980

Category: Appellate Procedure

Christy Siena v. Orange County Fire Rescue and CCMSI

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 20, 2025 | Docket: 71154551

Published

proceedings in workers’ compensation cases.” Fla. R. App. P. 9.180(a). Under that rule, this court “must” review

Category: Appellate Procedure

L. Anton Rebalko v. John Gillis, Head Industries and Amerisure Insurance

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 6, 2025 | Docket: 71038927

Published

guardian. This is not an appealable order. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.180(b)(1) (designating three categories of appealable

Category: Appellate Procedure

Rooms to Go Warehouse v. King

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 25, 2025 | Docket: 70629870

Published

2025 PER CURIAM. DISMISSED. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.180(b)(1)(C) (providing for an appeal of a nonfinal

Category: Appellate Procedure

Lay v. Storm Smart Building Systems, Inc., Bridgefield Casualty Insurance Company

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 2, 2025 | Docket: 69833914

Published

dismisses the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Fla. R. App. P. 9.180(b)(1)(C). OSTERHAUS, C.J., and RAY and

Category: Appellate Procedure

In Re: Amendments to Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 6, 2025 | Docket: 69710619

Published

amended to replace an obsolete reference to rule 9.180(c)(3) with a reference to subdivision (c)(2)

Category: Appellate Procedure

Land 'N Sea Distributing, Inc. v. McDonald

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 31, 2024 | Docket: 68999066

Published

dismisses the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Fla. R. App. P. 9.180(b)(1)(C); Cadco Builders, Inc. v. Roberts

Category: Appellate Procedure

Girardin v. AN Fort Myers Imports, LLC, Gallagher Bassett

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 8, 2024 | Docket: 68511405

Published

jurisdiction to address the overlap. Cf. Fla. R. App. P. 9.180(c)(1) (“The lower tribunal retains jurisdiction

Category: Appellate Procedure

Joseph v. Central Park Healthcare and Rehabilitation, XL Specialty Insurance Company

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 24, 2024 | Docket: 68187986

Published

this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.180(b)(3); Fla. R. App. P. 9.410. ROWE, M.K

Category: Appellate Procedure

Pamela Vogelar v. Winn-Dixie/Sedgwick CMS

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 29, 2023 | Docket: 68043829

Published

See Fla. Admin. Code R. 60Q-6.122(3); Fla. R. App. P. 9.180(b)(3); Fla. R. App. P. 9.410. ROWE, BILBREY

Category: Appellate Procedure

In Re: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 12, 2023 | Docket: 67875253

Published

-3- Next, rule 9.180 is amended to align with section 440.25(5)(b)

Category: Appellate Procedure

In Re: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure - 2020 Regular-Cycle Report

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 11, 2021 | Docket: 59245136

Published

Statutes. (c)-(e) [NO CHANGE] RULE 9.180. APPEAL PROCEEDINGS TO REVIEW WORKERS’

Category: Appellate Procedure

In Re: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure - 2020 Regular-Cycle Report

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 29, 2020 | Docket: 18584684

Published

Statutes. (c)-(e) [NO CHANGE] RULE 9.180. APPEAL PROCEEDINGS TO REVIEW WORKERS’

Category: Appellate Procedure

Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. and UPS v. Wilbert Miller

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 20, 2019 | Docket: 16222654

Published

includes certain specified provisions). Fla. R. App. P. 9.180(b)(1)(A)-(C). And unlike the recently expanded

Category: Appellate Procedure

In Re: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure

225 So. 3d 223, 42 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 794, 2017 Fla. LEXIS 1824, 42 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 794

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 7, 2017 | Docket: 6148796

Published

Change] Committee Notes [No Change] RULE 9.180. APPEAL PROCEEDINGS TO REVIEW WORKERS’ COMPENSATION

Category: Appellate Procedure

John O'Connor v. Indian River County Fire Rescue

197 So. 3d 156, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 11619, 2016 WL 4179482

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 2, 2016 | Docket: 4115852

Published

“benefits” as such were at issue. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.180(b)(4) (requiring the notice of appeal to

Category: Appellate Procedure

Victor Soca v. Advanced Auto Parts and Sedgwick Claims etc.

185 So. 3d 1258

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 22, 2016 | Docket: 3038327

Published

adjudicating jurisdiction. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.180(b)(1)(A). The JCC erred in .ruling

Category: Appellate Procedure

Romay v. Caribevision Holdings, Inc.

173 So. 3d 1055, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 11353, 2015 WL 4549623

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 29, 2015 | Docket: 2679128

Published

PER CURIAM. Pursuant to Rule 9.180(a)(8)(D) of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, Appellants

Category: Appellate Procedure

Bonafide Masonry v. Saxton

159 So. 3d 300, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 3142, 2015 WL 928469

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 5, 2015 | Docket: 60246546

Published

“adjudicates” jurisdiction, as the term is used in Rule 9.180(b)(1)(A). In the order, the JCC specifically

Category: Appellate Procedure

BONAFIDE MASONRY, Retailfirst etc. v. Russell R. Saxton

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 4, 2015 | Docket: 2639476

Published

“adjudicates” jurisdiction, as the term is used in Rule 9.180(b)(1)(A). In the order, the JCC specifically

Category: Appellate Procedure

Walker v. Perry

162 So. 3d 253, 2015 WL 798958

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 26, 2015 | Docket: 60247460

Published

this particular appellate cost issue. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.180(c)(1). As to the determination of the amount

Category: Appellate Procedure

In Re: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 18, 2014 | Docket: 2616692

Published

- 25 - RULE 9.180. APPEAL PROCEEDINGS TO REVIEW

Category: Appellate Procedure

Grasso v. Grasso

113 So. 3d 855, 2012 WL 751953, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 3802

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 9, 2012 | Docket: 60231620

Published

The temporary injunction is reviewable under rule 9.180(a)(3)(B). However, the appellants have not challenged

Category: Appellate Procedure

In re Amendments to the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure

75 So. 3d 239, 2011 WL 5218961

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 3, 2011 | Docket: 60303673

Published

notice is timely filed as to each such order. RULE 9.180. APPEAL PROCEEDINGS TO REVIEW WORKERS’ COMPENSATION

Category: Appellate Procedure

Orange County v. Richards

68 So. 3d 361, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 13242, 2011 WL 3676996

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 23, 2011 | Docket: 60302258

Published

this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.180(b)(1)(C). See also, e.g., Landry v. AMS

Category: Appellate Procedure

Diaz, Reus & Targ, LLP v. Bird Wingate, LLC

66 So. 3d 974, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 9591, 2011 WL 2500990

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 22, 2011 | Docket: 60301911

Published

dismissal with prejudice. We have jurisdiction. Fla. R. App. P. 9.180(a)(5). We affirm. We give below a summary

Category: Appellate Procedure

Ibarra v. Hercules Distributing Co.

60 So. 3d 536, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 6457, 2011 WL 1634238

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 2, 2011 | Docket: 60300267

Published

from a non-appealable, non-final order. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.180(b)(1). Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED

Category: Appellate Procedure

KGW Services, Inc. v. Wilder

53 So. 3d 1219, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 1573, 2011 WL 479987

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 11, 2011 | Docket: 60298033

Published

wage and temporary disability benefits. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.180(b)(1); Lama v. Miami-Dade County, 36 So

Category: Appellate Procedure

City of Fort Lauderdale v. Miller

58 So. 3d 284, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 1585, 2011 WL 479996

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 11, 2011 | Docket: 505823

Published

McDonald's, 933 So.2d 71 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006); Fla. R.App. P. 9.180(b)(2); Fla. Admin. Code R. 60Q-6.119. See

Category: Appellate Procedure

NFL Europa v. Charles

46 So. 3d 1194, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 17001, 2010 WL 4366208

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 5, 2010 | Docket: 60296154

Published

is a non-appealable, non-final order. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.180(b)(1). The order neither awards nor denies

Category: Appellate Procedure

Brutus v. Mears Transportation Group

49 So. 3d 295, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 15587, 2010 WL 4025922

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 15, 2010 | Docket: 60296715

Published

to the parties” unless timely appealed); Fla. R.App. P. 9.180(b)(3) (providing this court’s jurisdiction

Category: Appellate Procedure

M & M Supermarket v. Diaz

43 So. 3d 931, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 13562, 2010 WL 3584474

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 13, 2010 | Docket: 60295522

Published

this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.180(b)(1)(C). See also, e.g., Sun Sentinel &

Category: Appellate Procedure

Noel v. 1641 JEFFERSON, LLC

43 So. 3d 828, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 12395, 2010 WL 3351314

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 25, 2010 | Docket: 1222994

Published

to the parties" unless timely appealed); Fla. R.App. P. 9.180(b)(3) (providing this court's jurisdiction

Category: Appellate Procedure

Utility Lines Construction v. Crosby

35 So. 3d 53, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 5528, 2010 WL 1643335

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 26, 2010 | Docket: 2547755

Published

jurisdiction, venue, or compensability. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.180(b)(1). Thus, the order is "not appealable

Category: Appellate Procedure

Guarantee Insurance Co. v. Mercer

53 So. 3d 239, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 4687, 35 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 818

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 9, 2010 | Docket: 60298069

Published

a non-appeal-able, non-final order. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.180(b)(1). Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED

Category: Appellate Procedure

White v. Department of Juvenile Justice

38 So. 3d 166, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 2935, 2010 WL 816181

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 10, 2010 | Docket: 467359

Published

to the parties" unless timely appealed); Fla. R.App. P. 9.180(b)(3) (providing this court's jurisdiction

Category: Appellate Procedure

Juarez v. R.B. Baker Construction, Inc.

28 So. 3d 193, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 2070, 2010 WL 624232

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 24, 2010 | Docket: 433379

Published

See § 440.25(5)(a), Fla. Stat. (2007); Fla. R.App. P. 9.180(b)(2); Millinger v. Broward County Mental

Category: Appellate Procedure

In Re Amendments to the Florida Rules of Judicial Administration

24 So. 3d 47, 34 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 609, 2009 Fla. LEXIS 1921, 2009 WL 3763128

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 12, 2009 | Docket: 1648737

Published

these matters may be appealed only if listed in rule 9.180. 2009 Amendment. The rule was substantially amended

Category: Appellate Procedure

Columbia Lake City Medical Center/Broadspire v. Johns

25 So. 3d 578, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 15994, 2009 WL 3430913

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 27, 2009 | Docket: 60287601

Published

this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.180(b)(1)(C). See also, e.g., Landry v. AMS

Category: Appellate Procedure

Beach-Mathura v. Miami-Dade County Public schools/norland Middle School

1 So. 3d 378, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 664, 2009 WL 211965

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 30, 2009 | Docket: 1412833

Published

is a non-appealable, non-final order. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.180(b)(1). Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED

Category: Appellate Procedure

Gustin v. New River Correctional Institute

977 So. 2d 704, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 4228

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 24, 2008 | Docket: 64854263

Published

PER CURIAM. DISMISSED. Fla. R.App. P. 9.180(b)(2). PADOVANO, LEWIS, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Category: Appellate Procedure

Gustin v. NEW RIVER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE

977 So. 2d 704, 2008 WL 754432

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 24, 2008 | Docket: 2580379

Published

GA, for Appellees. PER CURIAM. DISMISSED. Fla. R.App. P. 9.180(b)(2). PADOVANO, LEWIS, and THOMAS, JJ.

Category: Appellate Procedure

Rodas v. Commercial Forming Corp.

976 So. 2d 620, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 1806, 2008 WL 351053

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 11, 2008 | Docket: 64854083

Published

even if the question were not moot. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.180(b)(1)(A)-(C) (2007). See also Roofcraft

Category: Appellate Procedure

U.S. Foundry & Manufacturing, Inc. v. Carner

959 So. 2d 378, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 9166, 2007 WL 1687728

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 13, 2007 | Docket: 64851270

Published

included as an issue in the initial brief. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.180(d)(1). Hence, Carner asserted that the circuit

Category: Appellate Procedure

Rance v. D.R. Horton, Inc.

953 So. 2d 622, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 4479, 2007 WL 878994

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 26, 2007 | Docket: 64850071

Published

issues, and dismissal is appropriate. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.180(b)(3); Murphy v. Palm Mattress Co., 889

Category: Appellate Procedure

Douglas v. Florida Power & Light, Inc.

921 So. 2d 750, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 2207, 2006 WL 397477

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 22, 2006 | Docket: 64842514

Published

entitlement to a vocational evaluation. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.180(b)(1)(A); see also Delgado v. J.C. Concrete

Category: Appellate Procedure

Dirie v. W.W. Trucking & Claims Center

900 So. 2d 779, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 6630, 2005 WL 1047307

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 6, 2005 | Docket: 64837959

Published

appellee’s motion to dismiss is granted. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.180(f)(5)(C). Accordingly, this appeal is hereby

Category: Appellate Procedure

Amendments to the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure

894 So. 2d 202, 30 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 84, 2005 Fla. LEXIS 154, 2005 WL 242690

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 3, 2005 | Docket: 64836172

Published

days of rendition of the order to be reviewed. Rule 9.180, governing appeal proceedings in workers’ compensation

Category: Appellate Procedure

D.K.B. v. Department of Children & Family Services

890 So. 2d 1288, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 354

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 21, 2005 | Docket: 64835426

Published

previously had been governed by rule 9.110. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.180 (addressing workers’ compensation); Fla

Category: Appellate Procedure

Judd-Johnson v. Johnson

892 So. 2d 521, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 19130, 2004 WL 2964725

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 15, 2004 | Docket: 64835743

Published

as an appeal of a non-final order pursuant to rule 9.180(a)(4), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Category: Appellate Procedure

Begor v. St. Mary's Hospital

875 So. 2d 806, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 9165, 2004 WL 1453498

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 30, 2004 | Docket: 64831153

Published

jurisdiction to review the JCC’s order. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.180(b)(1). DISMISSED. KAHN, DAVIS and PADOVANO

Category: Appellate Procedure

Ferguson v. State

873 So. 2d 581, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 7373, 2004 WL 1161647

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 26, 2004 | Docket: 64830708

Published

provide a stipulated statement as provided for in Rule 9.180(f)(4), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure,1

Category: Appellate Procedure

Wright-Long v. Wellington Manor

864 So. 2d 576, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 875, 2004 WL 182861

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 2, 2004 | Docket: 64827677

Published

this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.180(b)(2). To the extent appellant contends

Category: Appellate Procedure

Thompson v. Park Place of Venice, Inc.

888 So. 2d 47, 2003 WL 22908497

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 11, 2003 | Docket: 1697083

Published

was therefore Monday, September 22, 2003. Fla. R.App. P. 9.180(b)(2); 9.420(e). The order was issued by

Category: Appellate Procedure

Lopez v. Velasco

861 So. 2d 84, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 17173, 2003 WL 22669012

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 13, 2003 | Docket: 64826929

Published

interlocutory and is not appeal-able. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.180. Appeal dismissed. ALLEN, DAVIS and BENTON

Category: Appellate Procedure

Amendments to the Florida Rules of Workers' Compensation Procedure

829 So. 2d 791, 27 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 795, 2002 Fla. LEXIS 1884, 2002 WL 31084673

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 19, 2002 | Docket: 64818760

Published

correct clerical errors, as specified under Fla. R.App. P. 9.180(c)(2). Committee Notes 1996 Adoption. This

Category: Appellate Procedure

Amendments to Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure

827 So. 2d 888, 27 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 730, 2002 Fla. LEXIS 1810, 2002 WL 1981372

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Aug 29, 2002 | Docket: 64818042

Published

when the State files an appeal. Next, we amend rule 9.180 (Appeal Proceedings to Review Workers’ Compensation

Category: Appellate Procedure

Parmet v. Sarasota Memorial Hospital

823 So. 2d 284, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 11389, 2002 WL 1828080

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 12, 2002 | Docket: 64816819

Published

containing the materials ordinarily called for by rule 9.180(f)(1). Parmet then filed a designation seeking

Category: Appellate Procedure

Motorola, Inc. v. Bradshaw

798 So. 2d 819, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 15174, 2001 WL 1327139

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 30, 2001 | Docket: 64809827

Published

PER CURIAM. Pursuant to Fla. R.App.' P. 9.180(b)(1)(C), we review the nonfinal order issued below in

Category: Appellate Procedure

W & W Lumber of Palm Beach, Inc. v. Marrero

780 So. 2d 291, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 3351, 2001 WL 252048

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 15, 2001 | Docket: 64804346

Published

order that republishes the original. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.180(b)(2) We assume that the JCC’s intent in

Category: Appellate Procedure

Hauser v. Hauser

778 So. 2d 309, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 13222, 2000 WL 1508393

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 12, 2000 | Docket: 64803748

Published

child support. We have jurisdiction. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.180(a)(8)(C)(iii). Because the trial court failed

Category: Appellate Procedure

Amendments to the Florida Probate Rules

778 So. 2d 272, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 730, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 1905, 2000 WL 1424512

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 28, 2000 | Docket: 64803740

Published

granting new trial in jury and non-jury cases. Fla. R.App. P. 9.180(b) Proceedings to review non-final orders

Category: Appellate Procedure

Tompkins v. BellSouth Telecommunications

783 So. 2d 274, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 11207, 2000 WL 1233006

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 1, 2000 | Docket: 64804960

Published

relief from those costs by filing a petition under rule 9.180(g)(3), despite being notified in writing by the

Category: Appellate Procedure

Huddle House v. Peralta

754 So. 2d 753, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 2187, 2000 WL 243019

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 6, 2000 | Docket: 64796296

Published

brief, “accompanied by an appendix.” See Fla. R.App. P. 9.180(h)(2), 9.220. Rule 9.220 is clear that the

Category: Appellate Procedure

Henry's Office Supplies v. Henry

724 So. 2d 667, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 245, 1999 WL 12981

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 15, 1999 | Docket: 64785586

Published

the pleading, therefore causing more confusion. Rule 9.180(b)(2) provides that the time for invoking the

Category: Appellate Procedure

Delgado v. J.C. Concrete

721 So. 2d 353, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 13508, 1998 WL 736307

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 23, 1998 | Docket: 64784516

Published

viewed as final or as interlocutory. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.180(b)(1) (1997) (“The First District Court

Category: Appellate Procedure

Palomares v. Palomares

730 So. 2d 705, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 13466, 1998 WL 764679

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 21, 1998 | Docket: 64787628

Published

parties in perfecting the record on appeal. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.180(f)(6)(A). We recognize that this usually

Category: Appellate Procedure

Caruso v. Terry's Foods, Inc.

683 So. 2d 1136, 1996 WL 710803

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 11, 1996 | Docket: 466196

Published

provisions of rule 4.160 will be found in the new rule 9.180. Amendments to Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure

Category: Appellate Procedure

Outboard Marine Corp. v. Huggins

583 So. 2d 433, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 7714, 1991 WL 147619

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 7, 1991 | Docket: 64660537

Published

Procedure 9.130 and we therefore dismiss, sua sponte. Rule 9.180 provides that non-final orders are only reviewable

Category: Appellate Procedure