Cases from cite.case.law:

O FRANKLIN, v. STATE, 258 So. 3d 1239 (Fla. 2018)

. . . the Florida Parole Commission that are subject to judicial review, Michel , 257 So.3d at 6 (citing §§ 947.16 . . .

IN RE AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE- REGULAR- CYCLE REPORT., 265 So. 3d 494 (Fla. 2018)

. . . Retention of Jurisdiction ___ The court retains jurisdiction over the defendant pursuant to section 947.16 . . .

STATE v. MICHEL,, 257 So. 3d 3 (Fla. 2018)

. . . See §§ 947.16-.174, Fla. Stat. . . .

DAVIS, v. STATE, 214 So. 3d 779 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . See § 947.16(1), Fla. Stat. (1971). . . .

ATWELL, v. STATE, 197 So. 3d 1040 (Fla. 2016)

. . . .” § 947.16(5), Fla. Stat. . . .

In AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 188 So. 3d 764 (Fla. 2015)

. . . Retention of Jurisdiction The. court retains jurisdiction over the defendant pursuant to section 947.16 . . .

E. JONES, v. FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION,, 787 F.3d 1105 (11th Cir. 2015)

. . . . §§ 947.16(4), 947.172(3), 947.173(3) (1978); McKahn v. Fla. Parole and Prob. . . . Stat. §§ 947.16(4), 947.172(3), 947.173(3) (1978). Mr. . . .

NEREY, v. FLORIDA COMMISSION ON OFFENDER REVIEW,, 164 So. 3d 23 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . Pursuant to section 947.16(2)(g)3., Florida Statutes, the Commission scheduled Nerey’s initial parole . . . [e]ach mandatory minimum portion of consecutive sentences shall be served consecutively[.]” § 947.16( . . . We find nothing in section 947.16 providing for an alternative calculation method when a sentencing court . . . In light of the clear language of section 947.16(2), the circuit court correctly denied Nerey’s petition . . .

BATES, v. SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,, 768 F.3d 1278 (11th Cir. 2014)

. . . . § 947.16(l)(c)-(d) (1983). . . . See id. § 947.16(2)(g) (“For purposes of determining eligibility for parole interview and release, .. . . .

O FRANKLIN, v. STATE, 141 So. 3d 210 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . See § 947.16(3), Fla. Stat. (1982 Supp.). . . . See §§ 947.002, 947.16, 947.18, Fla. Stat. (1981). . . . , and now that the trial court has ordered that it will no longer retain jurisdiction under section 947.16 . . . See §§ 947.002, 947.16(4), 947.18, Fla. Stat. . . . See §§ 947.16(5) & 947.174(2-3), Fla. Stat. . . . the 1,000-year sentences and the fact that the sentencing court retained jurisdiction, under section 947.16 . . . See §§ 947.13(l)(a), 947.16(4)-(5), 947.172, 947.174(2)-(3), Fla. Stat. (2013). . . .

DORTCH, v. STATE, 137 So. 3d 1173 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . State, 93 So.3d 371, 378 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012) (Padovano, J., concurring) (suggesting that section 947.16 . . .

HARMON, III, v. STATE, 136 So. 3d 1223 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . jurisdiction over the first one-third of each of the Defendant’s 100-year sentences pursuant to section 947.16 . . .

SMITH, v. STATE, 93 So. 3d 371 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . In my view, the only lawful remedy is to declare unconstitutional section 947.16(6), Florida Statutes . . . The only impediment is that section 947.16(6), Florida Statutes provides that inmates sentenced after . . . For these reasons, I believe that the Florida courts have no alternative but to declare section 947.16 . . . Were I not bound by the precedents of this court, I would hold that section 947.16(6) is unconstitutional . . .

SHIFLET, v. STATE, 84 So. 3d 401 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . with the trial court retaining jurisdiction over the first third of that sentence pursuant to section 947.16 . . .

T. FREDRICK, v. STATE, 82 So. 3d 192 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . Compare § 947.16(3), Fla. Stat. (1981), with § 947.16(3), Fla. Stat. (Supp.1982). . . .

CONIONILLI, v. STATE, 58 So. 3d 380 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . that parole for a life sentence did exist until several years prior to Conionilli’s offense, see § 947.16 . . .

THORNE, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, 36 So. 3d 805 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . request one review of his or her initial presumptive parole release date established according to s. 947.16 . . .

HAYWARD, v. MARSHALL, s, 603 F.3d 546 (9th Cir. 2010)

. . . . §§ 947.16 (parole eligibility), .165 (parole guidelines); Ga.Code Ann. §§ 42-9-40 (parole guidelines . . .

In AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 26 So. 3d 534 (Fla. 2009)

. . . Retention of Jurisdiction _ The court retains jurisdiction over the defendant pursuant to section 947.16 . . .

AYALA- LAIES, v. STATE, 16 So. 3d 244 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . to July 29, 1983, the trial court issued an order retaining jurisdiction, in accordance with section 947.16 . . .

HOGAN, v. STATE, 12 So. 3d 835 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . respectively, and retained jurisdiction over the defendant on one-third of the sentences, pursuant to section 947.16 . . . See § 947.16(4), Fla. Stat. (2008). . . .

In AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 998 So. 2d 1128 (Fla. 2008)

. . . Retention of Jurisdiction _ The court retains jurisdiction over the defendant pursuant to section 947.16 . . .

E. GONZALEZ, v. STATE, 982 So. 2d 77 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . See, e.g., § 947.16, Fla. Stat. (1969). . . . .

GAUTHIER, v. MEKUSKER,, 186 F. App'x 903 (11th Cir. 2006)

. . . . § 947.16. . . .

FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION, v. CHAPMAN,, 919 So. 2d 689 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . While section 947.16(5), Florida Statutes, bars the Commission from modifying a PPRD absent reasons of . . .

I. WRIGHT, v. STATE, 911 So. 2d 81 (Fla. 2005)

. . . of a sentencing court to provide written reasons for retaining jurisdiction, in violation of section 947.16 . . . pursuant to rule 3.800(a), arguing that both his sentences were illegal because, first, under section 947.16 . . . Regarding certain crimes, section 947.16(4) provides: [A]t the time of sentencing the judge may enter . . . The purpose of section 947.16 was to prevent early parole of prisoners convicted of dangerous crimes . . . Subsection (3) was renumbered (4) with the 1985 amendments to section 947.16. . . .

MOORE, v. STATE, 902 So. 2d 239 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . Furthermore, section 947.16(3) of the Florida Statutes (1979), which addresses the court’s retention . . .

AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 886 So. 2d 197 (Fla. 2004)

. . . : Retention of Jurisdiction _ The court retains jurisdiction over the defendant pursuant to section 947.16 . . .

PERRY, Jr. v. STATE, 892 So. 2d 1062 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . Fla.1980) (answering the question of whether or not a defendant was eligible for parole under section 947.16 . . .

LOPEZ, v. STATE, 864 So. 2d 1151 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . solicitation to commit murder involved the use of intentional violence within the meaning of section 947.16 . . .

SAPP, v. STATE, 864 So. 2d 75 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . court stating on each count that it would retain jurisdiction over that sentence pursuant to section 947.16 . . . We find that this violates the express language of section 947.16, Florida Statutes, and case law interpreting . . .

R. KIRTSEY, v. STATE, 855 So. 2d 177 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . See § 947.16(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (1981); Hampton v. State, 764 So.2d 829 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). . . .

KING, v. STATE, 835 So. 2d 1224 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . The trial judge retained jurisdiction over the first one-third of each sentence pursuant to section 947.16 . . .

D. ROBERTS, v. STATE, 821 So. 2d 1144 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . Roberts contends that the trial court lacked statutory authority under section 947.16(3), Florida Statutes . . . Court held that the trial court cannot retain jurisdiction over a life sentence imposed under section 947.16 . . .

BINGHAM, v. STATE, 813 So. 2d 1021 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . specific and particular findings justifying the retention of jurisdiction in accordance with section 947.16 . . .

BARNHILL, Jr. v. STATE, 788 So. 2d 313 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . . § 947.16(3), Fla. Stat. (1983). . . .

AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 794 So. 2d 457 (Fla. 2000)

. . . Provisions: Retention of Jurisdiction _The court retains jurisdiction over the defendant pursuant to section 947.16 . . .

THAMES, v. STATE, 769 So. 2d 448 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . illegal because the trial court improperly retained jurisdiction over his case in violation of Section 947.16 . . .

W. HAMPTON, v. STATE, 764 So. 2d 829 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . The trial court included a special provision, pursuant to section 947.16(3), Florida Statute (1981), . . . the earlier pronouncement provided legally sufficient reasons to satisfy the requirements of section 947.16 . . . 421 So.2d 24 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982) (statement of justification for retention of jurisdiction under § 947.16 . . . challenged findings are no more specific than the findings that we deemed inadequate for purposes of section 947.16 . . . The pertinent provisions of the statute state: 947.16 Eligibility for parole; powers and duties of commission . . .

GAINES, v. FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION,, 743 So. 2d 118 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . See § 947.16(3), Fla. Stat. (Supp.1978). . . . Williams, 397 So.2d at 665, the supreme court noted "that for many years prior to section 947.16's enactment . . .

WAINWRIGHT, v. STATE, 704 So. 2d 511 (Fla. 1997)

. . . terms under section 775.082(1), Florida Statutes (1993), and no retention of jurisdiction under section 947.16 . . . See generally § 947.16(4), Fla. Stat. (1993). See also Willis v. . . .

VIERA, v. STATE, 698 So. 2d 918 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . trial court retained jurisdiction over defendant for 20 years as was then permitted under subsection 947.16 . . .

FERGUSON, v. STATE, 677 So. 2d 968 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . Ch. 96-422, § 19, Laws of Fla., amending § 947.16, Fla. Stat. . . .

JOHNSON, v. STATE, 679 So. 2d 9 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . Section 947.16(2)(g)3, Florida Statutes (1989) provided that an inmate serving a mandatory minimum sentence . . .

F. BLACKWELDER, v. STATE, 647 So. 2d 991 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . See § 947.16(3), Fla.Stat. (1981). . . . Where jurisdiction has been retained pursuant to section 947.16(4), the commission must also notify both . . . of the circuit) in the event it decides the inmate should be released during the retention period. § 947.16 . . . The statute has been renumbered as 947.16(4). . . .

BRAGGS, v. STATE, 642 So. 2d 129 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . See § 947.16(3), Fla.Stat. (Supp. 1982). . . .

STATE v. KING,, 629 So. 2d 278 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . King was under “control release” pursuant to section 947.16, Florida Statutes (1992), but the release . . .

STATE v. JOHNSON,, 627 So. 2d 98 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . See § 947.16(l)(g), Fla.Stat. (1991). . . .

J. HARPER, v. FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION,, 626 So. 2d 336 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . . §§ 947.16(5) & 947.173(3), Fla.Stat. (1991); Hester v. . . .

WILLIAMS, v. FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION,, 625 So. 2d 926 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . judge did not reserve jurisdiction to review future parole orders entered by the Commission, as section 947.16 . . . even though she had declined to retain jurisdiction to review a commission release order under section 947.16 . . . application of the statutory authorization for a judge to retain jurisdiction over an offender under section 947.16 . . . Florida Parole and Probation Comm’n, 543 So.2d 367 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989); §§ 947.16(5), and 947.173(3), . . . In 1978, section 947.16(3) authorized the sentencing judge to retain, for the first third of the sentence . . .

FORD, v. STATE, 624 So. 2d 863 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . alleges that the trial court retained jurisdiction over one-third of the sentence pursuant to section 947.16 . . .

LANG, v. STATE, 616 So. 2d 1171 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . sentence without providing justification for the retention at the time of sentencing, contrary to Section 947.16 . . . When appellant was sentenced on November 9, 1982, section 947.16(3) authorized trial judges “at the time . . . Section 947.16(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (Supp.1982). . . .

MACIAS, v. STATE, 614 So. 2d 1216 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . sufficiency of a trial court order retaining jurisdiction over one-third of the prison sentence [§ 947.16 . . .

THOMAS, v. STATE, 611 So. 2d 1324 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . stated that he was retaining jurisdiction over one-third of Thomas’ sentence pursuant to subsection 947.16 . . . Paragraph 947.16(3)(a), Florida Statutes (Supp.1982), states, “In retaining jurisdiction ... the trial . . . In sum, under the settled interpretation of section 947.16 the sentencing court was only required to . . . The Diaz court also commented about the pending prospective repeal of section 947.16. 563 So.2d at 200 . . . See § 947.16, Fla.Stat. (1991). . . .

STATE v. ARDUENGO,, 609 So. 2d 651 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . The court retained jurisdiction over half of each term pursuant to section 947.16(3), Florida Statutes . . . Arduengo on this question and, rather than reduce the retention period, deleted any reference to section 947.16 . . .

In AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 606 So. 2d 227 (Fla. 1992)

. . . : Retention of Jurisdiction _ The court retains jurisdiction over the defendant pursuant to section 947.16 . . .

THOMPSON, v. C. WADE,, 603 So. 2d 28 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . imprisonment and the trial judge retained jurisdiction over one-third of the sentence pursuant to section 947.16 . . .

In AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE- RULES AND, 603 So. 2d 1144 (Fla. 1992)

. . . Retention of Jurisdiction - The Court pursuant to F.S. 947.16(3) retains jurisdiction over the defendant-for . . . Retention of Jurisdiction __ The court retains jurisdiction over the defendant pursuant to section 947.16 . . .

E. WILLIAMS, v. STATE, 592 So. 2d 1199 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . theory underlying appellant’s jurisdictional challenge seems to be the changes effected in section 947.16 . . . The 1982 version of section 947.16(3)(c) provides: In such cases of retained jurisdiction, the commission . . .

MOBLEY, v. STATE, 590 So. 2d 1022 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . imposed, rather than over one-third of the total of the consecutive sentences imposed citing section 947.16 . . .

ANDERSON, v. STATE, 584 So. 2d 1127 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . According to section 947.16(3), Florida Statutes, (1979), now section 947.16(4), “When any person is . . .

HARRIS, v. STATE, 584 So. 2d 104 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . court failed to offer sufficient reasons for its retention of jurisdiction as required under section 947.16 . . . Section 947.16(3) is now section 947.16(4), Fla.Stat. (1989). . . .

TUBB, v. FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION,, 580 So. 2d 616 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . See §§ 947.16(4), 947.-173(3) Fla.Stat. (1983). . . .

OLMSTEAD, v. STATE, 569 So. 2d 868 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . In 1982 the trial court retained jurisdiction, pursuant to section 947.16(3), Florida Statutes (1981) . . .

A. WEMETT, v. STATE, 567 So. 2d 882 (Fla. 1990)

. . . See § 947.16(3), Fla. Stat. (1981). . . . circuit court could have merely corrected the illegal portion of its sentence to comply with section 947.16 . . . earn gain-time, sections 944.275, .291, Florida Statutes (1981), and to be released on parole, section 947.16 . . .

THOMPSON, v. STATE, 564 So. 2d 1189 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . .-087(2), with a retention of jurisdiction under Section 947.16(3), Florida Statutes. . . .

HALLMAN, v. STATE, 560 So. 2d 223 (Fla. 1990)

. . . Therefore, section 947.16, Florida Statutes (1985), authorizing retention of jurisdiction in order to . . .

T. HEATH, v. STATE, 558 So. 2d 165 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . . § 947.16(3), Fla.Stat. (1983); Brown v. State, 458 So.2d 1216 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984). . . . was amended to allow the trial judge to retain jurisdiction over one-third of the sentence imposed. § 947.16 . . .

SWANSON, v. FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COMMISSION,, 548 So. 2d 269 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . Sections 947.16(5), 947.173(3), Florida Statutes (1987); cf. . . .

W. WELLER, v. STATE, 547 So. 2d 997 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . Therefore, section 947.16(2)(g)3 fixes Weller’s initial parole interview date as “no sooner than 18 months . . .

STEWART, v. STATE, 546 So. 2d 1193 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . jurisdiction, arguing: (1) that the sentencing court erred in retaining jurisdiction, pursuant to section 947.16 . . . F.S. over the first third of his two pre-sentencing guidelines life sentences; and (2) that section 947.16 . . . Supreme Court has ruled on this issue and found the retention of jurisdiction provisions of section 947.16 . . . This provision is currently found in section 947.16(4), Florida Statutes (1987). . . .

WEMETT, v. STATE, 547 So. 2d 955 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . See § 947.16(3), Fla.Stat. (1983). . . . .

RAGAN, v. DUGGER,, 544 So. 2d 1052 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . court’s failure to give contemporaneous, specific reasons for retaining jurisdiction as required by § 947.16 . . . This statement regarding Ragan does not satisfy the requirement of § 947.16(3)(a), Florida Statutes, . . .

TAYLOR, v. FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COMMISSION,, 543 So. 2d 367 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . Sections 947.16(5), 947.172(3) and 947.-173(3); Fla. Parole and Probation Comm’n v. . . . Clearly, this reason violates § 947.16(5) because it was previously known and documented, but was not . . .

BERNADINI, v. STATE, 540 So. 2d 132 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . That statute is also binding on the Parole and Probation Commission as to parole (see § 947.16(2)(g)) . . .

M. AMAZON, v. STATE, 537 So. 2d 170 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . . § 947.16, Fla.Stat. (1987). . . .

STATE v. HALL F., 538 So. 2d 468 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . That statute is also binding on the Parole and Probation Commission as to parole (see § 947.16(2)(g)) . . .

FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COMMISSION, v. G. DORNAU,, 534 So. 2d 789 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . available at the time of the initial interview” or “good cause in exceptional circumstances” (sections 947.16 . . .

DUQUE, v. STATE, 526 So. 2d 1079 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . The trial judge, pursuant to section 947.16(3), Florida Statutes (1981), retained jurisdiction over the . . . Section 947.16 authorizes retention of jurisdiction for certain enumerated felonies and for any felony . . .

CARR, v. STATE, 528 So. 2d 406 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . or (4) the sentence of confinement may be never fully executed because the defendant is paroled (§ 947.16 . . .

M. MARSHALL, v. L. DUGGER,, 526 So. 2d 143 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . We find that these stated reasons fail to comply with the requirements of Section 947.16(3), Florida . . .

L. WILLIAMS, v. FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COMMISSION,, 515 So. 2d 1044 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . Under sections 947.16(4) and 947.173(3), F.S., a PPRD may be changed or modified only on the basis of . . .

R. VARNES, Jr. v. STATE, 510 So. 2d 1238 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . trial court improperly retained jurisdiction over one-third of a life sentence pursuant to section 947.16 . . .

D. McCONNELL, v. STATE, 513 So. 2d 1077 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . McConnell also complained that the court accepted his plea without any factual basis and that section 947.16 . . .

YATES, Sr. v. STATE, 509 So. 2d 1249 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . See § 947.16(3), Fla.Stat. (1983). . . .

FAIRWEATHER, v. STATE, 505 So. 2d 653 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . her that it was considering retaining jurisdiction over one-third of the sentence pursuant to section 947.16 . . .

C. GASKINS, v. STATE, 502 So. 2d 1344 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . Section 947.16(3), Florida Statutes (1979), enumerated certain offenses upon conviction of which a defendant . . . Section 947.16(3) provided, in pertinent part, that: Persons who have become eligible for parole and . . .

S. JOHNSON, v. STATE, 502 So. 2d 1352 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . court erred in retaining jurisdiction for one third of his 60-year prison sentence pursuant to section 947.16 . . .

LLIDA, v. STATE, 501 So. 2d 162 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . State, 438 So.2d 959 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); Section 947.16(4) Florida Statutes (1985). . . .

STANLEY, v. STATE, 501 So. 2d 90 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . Section 947.16(3), Florida Statutes (1981), authorizes the trial court to retain jurisdiction over a . . .

A. COBAN, v. STATE, 502 So. 2d 1262 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . judge's determination to retain jurisdiction over a portion of the sentence imposed pursuant to section 947.16 . . .

FAMIGLIETTI, v. STATE, 499 So. 2d 57 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . violence and the vicious manner in which the crimes were committed justified application of section 947.16 . . . On appeal, appellant contends the court erred in the retention of jurisdiction pursuant to section 947.16 . . . It is true that attempted murder, standing alone, cannot be the basis for application of section 947.16 . . .

CARR v. FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COMMISSION, 25 Fla. Supp. 2d 160 (Fla. Div. Admin. Hearings 1986)

. . . The Commission is required, under the provisions of Sections 947.16 and 947.172, Florida Statutes, to . . .

McCANT, v. STATE PAROLE AND PROBATION COMMISSION,, 497 So. 2d 1315 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . See § 947.16(2)(f), Fla.Stat. (1985). . . .

JACKSON, v. STATE, 497 So. 2d 962 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . his sentence without stating its justification for doing so with particularity, according to section 947.16 . . .

JOHNSON, v. STATE, 495 So. 2d 830 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . Johnson was sentenced in 1981, making the governing statute section 947.16(3), Florida Statutes (1981 . . . Section 947.16(3), which specifies the manner in which the trial court may retain jurisdiction over a . . . remanded the case with directions to reconsider the period of retention in accordance with section 947.16 . . . In sum, section 947.16(3), Florida Statutes (1981), and the courts which have construed that statute . . . We therefore remand Johnson’s sentencing order for resentencing in a manner consistent with section 947.16 . . .

SHELEY, v. FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COMMISSION,, 496 So. 2d 854 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . Appellant contends also that under section 947.16(5), Florida Statutes, the Commission may not modify . . . PPRD pursuant to a court order in these circumstances is not subject to the constraints of section 947.16 . . .

SLAUGHTER, W. E. L. M. v. STATE, 493 So. 2d 1109 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . the trial court retained jurisdiction for one-third of Stacey’s sentence in accordance with Section 947.16 . . .

MORRIS, v. STATE, 493 So. 2d 19 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . See § 947.16, Fla.Stat. (1985). . . .

MURRAY, v. STATE, 491 So. 2d 1120 (Fla. 1986)

. . . .” § 947.16(3)(a), Fla.Stat. (1983). We reject this contention. . . .