Florida/Georgia Personal Injury & Workers Compensation

You're probably overthinking it. Call a lawyer.

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 947.002 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 947.002 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 947.002 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 947.002

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XLVII
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AND CORRECTIONS
Chapter 947
FLORIDA COMMISSION ON OFFENDER REVIEW; CONDITIONAL RELEASE; CONTROL RELEASE; PAROLE
View Entire Chapter
947.002 Intent.
(1) It is the purpose of this chapter to establish an objective means for determining and establishing parole dates for inmates.
(2) Objective parole criteria will be designed to give primary weight to the seriousness of the offender’s present criminal offense and the offender’s past criminal record. In considering the risk of recidivism, practice has shown that the best predictor is prior record.
(3) The chair shall be the agency head. While the commission is responsible for making decisions on the granting and revoking of parole, the chair shall establish, execute, and be held accountable for all administrative policy decisions. The routine administrative decisions are the full responsibility of the chair.
(4) Hearing examiners are assigned on the basis of caseload needs as determined by the chair.
(5) It is the intent of the Legislature that the decision to parole an inmate from the incarceration portion of the inmate’s sentence is an act of grace of the state and shall not be considered a right.
History.s. 1, ch. 78-417; s. 1, ch. 81-322; s. 2, ch. 82-171; s. 34, ch. 83-131; s. 37, ch. 86-183; s. 67, ch. 88-122; s. 17, ch. 89-531; s. 20, ch. 90-337; s. 1, ch. 93-2; s. 3, ch. 93-61; s. 1667, ch. 97-102.

F.S. 947.002 on Google Scholar

F.S. 947.002 on CourtListener

Amendments to 947.002


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 947.002

Total Results: 26  |  Sort by: Relevance  |  Newest First

Copy

Charles A. Damiano A/K/A Charles A. Damyn v. Florida Parole & Prob. Comm'n & Jim Smith, the Attorney Gen. of the State of Florida, 785 F.2d 929 (11th Cir. 1986).

Cited 70 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 23655

...Such an interest arises only when a parole statute provides that specific conditions mandate release. See id. at 688 . Although much of the Florida statute is written in mandatory terms, 2 the ultimate parole decision is a matter of Parole Commission discretion. See id. Section 947.002 specifically provides that parole is granted only when the Commission finds a reasonable probability that a prisoner will live as a respectable law-abiding person, that he will be suitably employed and that his release is compatible with the best interests of society and himself....
Copy

Daniels v. Florida Parole & Prob. Comm'n, 401 So. 2d 1351 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981).

Cited 32 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

...We are not asked to decide in this appeal whether the Florida Objective Parole Guidelines Act of 1978 provides a protectible expectation of parole to an inmate. Nevertheless, we note that the purpose of the Act was to replace a system which had formerly determined parole solely by subjective standards. See Section 947.002(1)....
Copy

Albert E. Paschal v. Louie L. Wainwright, Etc., 738 F.2d 1173 (11th Cir. 1984).

Cited 29 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 19632

...See Moore, 289 So.2d at 720 . B. In 1978, the Florida Legislature passed the Parole Act because the previous system lacked objective criteria for parole decision making and, thus, was “subject to allegations of arbitrary and capricious release [decisions].” Fla.Stat.Ann. § 947.002(1) (1983 Supp.)....
...of parole, subject to modification based on change of circumstances.” Fla.Stat.Ann. § 947.18 (1983 Supp.). 9 . For example, parole is still a matter of executive grace; inmates have no liberty interest in, or entitlement to, parole. Fla.Stat.Ann. § 947.002(6) (1983 Supp.); see also Staton v....
Copy

Florida Parole & Prob. Com'n v. Paige, 462 So. 2d 817 (Fla. 1985).

Cited 14 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 57, 1985 Fla. LEXIS 2879

...that Florida's Objective Parole Guidelines Act has restricted the Commission's previously unbounded discretion in granting parole. The Objective Parole Guidelines Act's ultimate intent is to prevent arbitrary and capricious action by the Commission. § 947.002(1), Fla....
Copy

Roberson v. Fla. Parole & Prob. Com'n, 444 So. 2d 917 (Fla. 1983).

Cited 13 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida

...e legislature passed the Objective Parole Guidelines Act of 1978, chapter 78-417, Laws of Florida. The intent of that act was to cure the abuses of unbridled discretion, and present a fair and objective set of standards applicable to parole matters. § 947.002, Fla....
Copy

Williams v. Florida Parole Com'n, 625 So. 2d 926 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993).

Cited 13 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 10537, 1993 WL 414240

...The elaborate procedural requirements laid out in chapter 947, Florida Statutes, and the implementing rules in chapter 23-21, Florida Administrative Code, are obviously intended to accomplish the purpose of the "Objective Parole Guidelines Act of 1978" that is, as stated in section 947.002, "to establish *938 an objective means for determining and establishing parole dates for inmates" and thereby eliminate the lack of "objective criteria for paroling" and "allegations of arbitrary and capricious release and, therefore, potential abuses." § 947.002(1), Fla....
...that Florida's Objective Parole Guidelines Act has restricted the Commission's previously unbounded discretion in granting parole. The Objective Parole Guidelines Act's ultimate intent is to prevent arbitrary and capricious action by the Commission. § 947.002(1), Fla....
...If the Commission does not give consideration to all such matters, it fails to give recognition to the Parole Act's stated objective of establishing objective criteria to govern decisions for granting release on parole and eliminate "allegations of arbitrary and capricious release and, therefore, potential abuses." § 947.002(1), Fla....
Copy

Mckahn v. Florida Parole & Prob., 399 So. 2d 476 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981).

Cited 13 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20095

...role decisions are made, thereby reaching the same date previously established. This it cannot do. The purpose of the Objective Parole Guidelines Act of 1978 was to replace a system which had formerly decided parole solely by subjective methods. See Section 947.002 and Daniels v....
Copy

Battis v. Florida Parole & Prob. Comm'n, 386 So. 2d 295 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980).

Cited 9 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

...The commission asserts that in order to apply the objective parole criteria promulgated pursuant to the legislative command, the commission must be in possession of sufficient information upon which to evaluate the inmate. Our attention is directed to § 947.002(2), Florida Statutes, wherein the legislature advises that "objective parole criteria will be designed to give primary weight to the seriousness of the offender's present criminal offense and his past criminal record." The salient factors...
Copy

State of Florida v. Budry Michel, 257 So. 3d 3 (Fla. 2018).

Cited 9 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida

...Importantly, the statute requires “primary weight” in the consideration of parole to be given “to the seriousness of the offender’s present offense”—here, the most serious offense of first-degree murder—“and the offender’s past criminal record.” § 947.002, Fla....
Copy

Florida Parole Comm'n v. Spaziano, 48 So. 3d 714 (Fla. 2010).

Cited 7 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 35 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 582, 2010 Fla. LEXIS 1730, 2010 WL 4007636

...We have considered each of these contentions and find that none of them supports the Commission's contention that section 57.085(10) is inapplicable to actions challenging an inmate's PPRD calculation. Chapter 947 sets forth the legislative scheme governing parole in this state. We recognize that section 947.002, Florida Statutes (2009), titled "Intent," confirms that parole is not a matter of right, but is one of legislative grace. § 947.002(5), Fla....
...ded in section 947.18.' [ May v. Fla. Parole & Prob. Comm'n, 435 So.2d 834, 837 (Fla. 1983)].... On the record before us, we find no abuse of discretion by the Commission in declining at this time to set an effective parole release date."); see also § 947.002(5), Fla....
Copy

Angelo Atwell v. State of Florida, 197 So. 3d 1040 (Fla. 2016).

Cited 7 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 41 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 244, 2016 WL 3010795, 2016 Fla. LEXIS 1124

...ole for the armed robbery. As mandated by the existing statutory scheme, Florida’s parole process requires “primary weight” to be given to the “seriousness of the offender’s present offense and the offender’s past criminal record.” See § 947.002, Fla....
...ive parole guidelines. Id. Under Florida statutory law, the objective parole criteria applied by the Commission must “give primary weight to the seriousness of the offender’s present criminal offense and the offender’s past criminal record.” § 947.002, Fla....
...Importantly, the statute requires “primary weight” in the consideration of parole to be given “to the seriousness of the offender’s present offense” — here, the most serious offense of first-degree murder — “and the offender’s past criminal record.” § ,947.002, Fla....
...nished culpability of juveniles” during its parole hearings for juvenile offenders. W. Va.Code § 62-12-13b(b) (2015). In Florida, however, the decision to parole an inmate “is ah act of grace of the state and shall not be considered a right.” § 947.002(5), Fla. Stat. By statute, the objective parole criteria .must “give primary weight to 'the seriousness of the offender’s present criminal offense and the offender’s past criminal record.” .§ 947.002(2), Fla....
Copy

James v. Fla. Parole & Prob. Com'n, 395 So. 2d 197 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981).

Cited 7 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

The chapter contemplates an objective system, Section 947.02, Fla. Stat. (1980); the Commission may exercise
Copy

Gobie v. Florida Parole & Prob. Com'n, 416 So. 2d 838 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982).

Cited 6 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

...However, we agree with Payton, supra, and find that Florida's Objective Parole Guidelines Act has restricted the Commission's previously unbounded discretion in granting parole. The Objective Parole Guidelines Act's ultimate intent is to prevent arbitrary and capricious action by the Commission. § 947.002(1), Fla....
Copy

Stephen Sultenfuss, Charles McMulling v. Wayne Snow, Jr., James T. Morris, Mobley Howell, Michael H. Wing, Bettye O. Hutchings, Michael J. Bowers, 7 F.3d 1543 (11th Cir. 1993).

Cited 4 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 28726, 1993 WL 444020

...that there is no "right" to parole in Florida: "It is the intent of the Legislature that the decision to parole an inmate from the incarceration portion of his sentence is an act of grace of the state and shall not be considered a right." Fla.Stat. § 947.002 (1985)....
Copy

Jackson v. Florida Parole & Prob. Comm'n, 424 So. 2d 930 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 18424

...[4] As to the first reason that two prior paroles have been revoked, Jackson points out that the most recent parole was almost ten years ago, which could be adequate time in which to rehabilitate himself. While prior record may be the best predictor of recidivism, § 947.002(2), Jackson's actions from over 10 years ago may not, without more, be indicative of his parole prognosis, in view of the rehabilitative function of prisons....
Copy

Myers v. Florida Parole & Prob. Com'n, 705 So. 2d 1000 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 911, 1998 WL 39400

...will be designed to give primary weight to the seriousness of the offender's present criminal offense and his past criminal record. In considering the risk of recidivism, practice has shown that the best predictor is prior record. (emphasis added). § 947.002(2), Fla....
Copy

Tubb v. Florida Parole Com'n, 580 So. 2d 616 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 241, 1991 WL 3176

...This argument lacks merit. First, the legislature has made clear that no inmate has an absolute legal right to receive parole. Instead, the decision to parole an inmate from the incarcerative portion of his sentence is an act of grace extended by the state. § 947.002(6), Fla....
Copy

Florida Institutional Legal Servs., Inc. v. Parole & Prob. Comm'n Qualifications Comm., 419 So. 2d 714 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21125

120.54(5). We agree and dismiss the appeal. Section 947.02(1), Florida Statutes, provides for the creation
Copy

William Deleon Perez v. State of Florida (Fla. 2d DCA 2023).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal

prison inmates' eligibility for parole. See § 947.02(1), Fla. Stat. (2022). The Commission on Offender
Copy

Bundy v. Florida Parole & Prob. Comm'n, 419 So. 2d 1181 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21317

dates by purely subjective considerations. Section 947.002(1), Florida Statutes. The adoption of the Act
Copy

William Deleon Perez v. State of Florida (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2023).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

prison inmates' eligibility for parole. See § 947.02(1), Fla. Stat. (2022). The Commission on Offender
Copy

State of Florida v. Budry Michel (Fla. 2018).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida

...Importantly, the statute requires “primary weight” in the consideration of parole to be given “to the seriousness of the offender’s present offense”—here, the most serious offense of first-degree murder—“and the offender’s past criminal record.” § 947.002, Fla....
Copy

Lobo v. Florida Parole & Prob. Comm'n, 433 So. 2d 622 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20091

similarly situated prisoners are eliminated. Section 947.002(1) provides: The present system lacks objective
Copy

Rooks v. State, 224 So. 3d 272 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2017 WL 2960766, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 9962

offense and the offender’s past criminal record.” § 947.002, Fla. Stat. (2015). The hearing examiner may consider
Copy

Hipke v. Parole & Prob. Comm'n, 380 So. 2d 494 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 16036

...No error is shown in the Commission’s consideration, during assessment of Hipke’s past criminal record, of an offense committed in another country. The inmate’s entire “past criminal record” is pertinent in the Commission’s assessment of the inmate’s recidivist tendencies. See Section 947.002(2), Florida Statutes (1979)....
Copy

Robert Earl Howard v. Melinda N. Coonrod (11th Cir. 2025).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Argued: Nov 21, 2024

discretionary one. Com- pare Fla. Stat. § 947.002(5) (“It is the intent of the Legislature that

This Florida statute resource is curated by Graham W. Syfert, Esq., a Jacksonville, Florida personal injury and workers' compensation attorney. For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.