Cases from cite.case.law:

STATE v. B. HANCOCK,, 529 So. 2d 1200 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . Hancock claims that the filing requirement in this case is similar to that set forth in section 932.61 . . .

WHIRLEY, v. STATE, 450 So. 2d 836 (Fla. 1984)

. . . only arguable statutory right to a jury trial for what we find to be a petty offense is under section 932.61 . . .

STATE v. A. REED,, 448 So. 2d 1102 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . See §§ 316.1934(4), 932.61, Fla. Stat. (1983). . . . 379 So.2d 209 (Fla.1979), the court held there was a statutory right to a jury trial under section 932.61 . . .

STATE v. L. WHIRLEY,, 421 So. 2d 555 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . Smith had waived his right to trial by jury by failing to file a transfer petition pursuant to section 932.61 . . .

H. SMITH, Jr. v. CITY OF LAKELAND,, 392 So. 2d 262 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

. . . However, pursuant to Section 932.61, Florida Statutes (1979), a person charged with violation of a municipal . . . This court has construed Section 932.61 to confer a statutory right to jury trial when the violation . . . statutory right to jury trial because he did not file a petition for transfer in accordance with Section 932.61 . . . Addressing this argument, we note that Section 932.61 was enacted in 1970, prior to the abolition of . . . Therefore, on the date of enactment of Section 932.61, violations of municipal ordinances were within . . .

POWERS, v. STATE, 370 So. 2d 854 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

. . . It has been determined that Section 932.61, Florida Statutes (1977), confers a statutory right to a jury . . .

A. BUTTERWORTH, a v. W. HARDIN,, 362 So. 2d 453 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

. . . Section 932.61, Florida Statutes (1975), requires a municipal judge to forthwith entertain a petition . . . the requisite three (3) days from the date of the signing of the order of transfer, pursuant to F.S. 932.61 . . .

CITY OF TAMPA, v. IPPOLITO,, 360 So. 2d 1316 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

. . . Section 932.61, Florida Statutes (1977), confers a statutory right to a jury trial when the violation . . .

McELROY, v. BROWN,, 311 So. 2d 786 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

. . . entry and the case has been transferred to county court for trial by jury as authorized by Section 932.61 . . .

STATE v. A. HENDRICKS,, 309 So. 2d 232 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

. . . February 28, 1974 Defendant petitioned the City to transfer the case to the County Court pursuant to F.S. 932.61 . . .

STATE F. BREWER, v. B. PETTIE,, 294 So. 2d 120 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974)

. . . . § 932.61, F.S.A. . . .

CASTANEDA, v. C. CONSER,, 292 So. 2d 37 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974)

. . . Section 932.61, F.S.A.) demanded jury trial, petitioning for transfer to the Orange County Court since . . .

STATE NEGRON, v. COURT OF RECORD IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY,, 286 So. 2d 582 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1973)

. . . Such construction of § 932.61 F.S.A. is fortified by examination in the following section of the same . . . The Cook case referring to F.S.A. §§ 932.61 — 932.65 states: “With respect to the transfer of a municipal . . .

STATE v. COOK, 264 So. 2d 417 (Fla. 1972)

. . . . § 932.61, F.S.A., describes the method by which charges may be filed in the State court when a person . . . The time periods prescribed in Fla.Stat. §§ 932.61-932.65, F.S.A., relate to the filing of charges in . . .

STATE v. HAYNIE, 37 Fla. Supp. 51 (Fla. Cir. Ct. 1972)

. . . also constituted criminal violations of the laws of the State of Florida. 2Pursuant to Florida Statute 932.61 . . . Whether or not the case is a “transfer case” under Florida Statute 932.61, a non-transferred felony or . . . Florida Statute 932.61 is the “transfer” statute and reads as follows: Transfer of county or municipal . . .

NESLER, v. HAMPTON, III,, 260 So. 2d 561 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)

. . . . § 932.61, F.S.A. . F.S. § 322.262(4), F.S.A. . Ordinance No. 1677, § 1 — 11. . . . .

STATE v. RESSLER,, 257 So. 2d 620 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1971)

. . . The resolution of the issue in this case involves an interpretation of Sections 932.61 and 932.63, F.S . . . Thereafter, respondent filed a petition pursuant to Section 932.61, F.S.1970, F.S.A., in the municipal . . . Section 932.61, F.S.1970, F.S.A., creates a right in a person who has been charged in a municipal court . . . The provisions of Section 932.61, F.S.1970, are supplemented by Section 932.63, F.S.1970, which provides . . . .1970, F.S.A., of the cause transferred to it by the municipal court under the authority of Section 932.61 . . .

MITCHELL v. CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE,, 254 So. 2d 824 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1971)

. . . The resolution of this issue involves an interpretation of F.S. 1970, Section 932.61, F.S.A., a recent . . . F.S.1970, Section 932.61, F.S.A., relied upon by the petitioners, provides in pertinent part as follows . . . municipality do not clearly demonstrate that the municipal violation is also a violation of state law, Section 932.61 . . .

STATE v. COOK, 254 So. 2d 560 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1971)

. . . The defendants petitioned the City court under Fla.Stat. 932.61, F.S.A. to have their cases transferred . . . informations because the cases were not transferred within the three-day statutory limits set out in Fla.Stat. 932.61 . . . Florida Statute § 932.61, F.S.A. prescribes the method whereby a person, charged in a court that does . . . The pertinent parts of the statute are as follows : “932.61 Transfer of county or municipal charge to . . .

ERB v. CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE, 36 Fla. Supp. 21 (Broward Cty. Cir. Ct. 1971)

. . . the pendency of these proceedings, the legislature has enacted ch. 70-372, Laws of Florida, 1970, §932.61 . . . petitioner with a jury trial in said court or, upon proper application by petitioner in conformity with §932.61 . . .

DOHM, v. D. O CONNOR, a, 240 So. 2d 636 (Fla. 1970)

. . . Act relating to criminal trial procedure; amending chapter 932, Florida Statutes, by adding sections 932.61 . . .