Florida/Georgia Personal Injury & Workers Compensation

...petitions for habeas corpus ad testificandum, as other petitions for writs of habeas corpus, should not be granted when the relief sought can be obtained through other legal processes.” Id. The court found the following relevant facts on direct appeal: Section 914.001, Florida Statutes (1979), provides that witness subpoenas in criminal cases shall run throughout the state, and section 48.051, Florida Statutes (1979), specifically allows for service of process on state prisoners.......

Court agreed and reversed, relying on Fla. Stat. § 914.01, F.S.A. *139 It is settled law that trial begins

...State, 139 Fla. 226, 190 So. 875 (1939). The issuance of the writ is in the discretion of the trial court, Moody v. State, 418 So.2d 989 (Fla. 1982); Baker v. State, 47 So.2d 728 (Fla. 1950), and in most instances its use has been superseded by statute. Section 914.001, Florida Statutes (1979), provides that witness subpoenas in criminal cases shall run throughout the state, and section 48.051, Florida Statutes (1979), specifically allows for service of process on state prisoners....

suggested rule is in great part a recopying of section 914.01, Florida Statutes: In (3) the words "at the

410, 33 F.S.A. The second statute, F.S. 1967, Section 914.01(4), F.S.A., provides that in a felony prosecution

committed error necessitating a new trial. Section 914.01, Florida Statutes 1951, F.S.A., provides that

a private conversation with a sworn juror. Section 914.01, Florida Statutes Annotated, provides in part:

1966, 181 So.2d 698: "After an examination of § 914.01,[5] supra, and a review of decisions regarding

suggested rule is in great part a recopying of section 914.01, Florida Statutes: In (3) the words "at the

attack on any grounds urged by the appellant. Section 914.01, Florida Statutes 1941, F.S.A., requires the

contrary to the laws of Florida, in particular Section 914.01, "In all prosecutions for a felony the defendant

appeal because we find the conversation violated Section 914.01, Fla.Stats., F.S.A., and the accuseds' right

waived the defendant's right to be present. *700 Section 914.01, Fla. Stat., F.S.A. provides: "In all prosecutions

...Unlike personal jurisdiction over a foreign corporation registered and doing business within the State of Florida, the subpoena power of a Florida court over a person or legal entity which is not a party in a lawsuit does not extend beyond state lines. See § 914.001(1), Fla....

finding of the trial judge. The requirement of § 914.01 Fla. Stat., F.S.A., that “In all prosecutions

...Unlike personal jurisdiction over a foreign corporation registered and doing business within the State of Florida, the subpoena power of a Florida court over a person or legal entity which is not a party in a lawsuit does not extend beyond state lines. See § 914.001(1), Fla....

...ious statutory provisions pertaining to the issuance of subpoenas and the limits on a trial court’s subpoena power over documents and materials belonging to an out-of-state, non-party witness that are located outside of *921 the state. Pursuant to section 914.001(1), Florida Statutes (2010), a subpoena for a witness in a criminal case “shall run throughout the state and be directed to all of the sheriffs of the state.” (Emphasis added.) Nothing within this provision extends a court’s subpoena power beyond the state boundaries....

...odian, who was also located out-of-state. In other words, neither the documents nor the records custodian are located in Florida, and the defendants do not contend otherwise. Thus, as subpoenas issued in this state run only throughout the state, see § 914.001(1), Fla....

...5 As explained herein, the provisions of chapter 607 governing registered agents cannot be invoked to obtain documents from a nonparty corporation, where the corporation and the requested documents or materials are located out-of-state. Further, pursuant to section 914.001(1), the authority to issue subpoenas to nonparty witnesses extends only to witnesses or documents located in this state....

voluntarily absented himself from the trial. See Section 914.01, Florida Statutes, F.S.A.; Mulvey v. State

his trial in contravention of the provisions of § 914.01, Fla.Stat., F.S.A.” This court after a full review

defendants of their statutory rights under section 914.01, F.S.A., to be present at every material stage

further discuss this question. The statute, section 914.01, F.S., F.S.A,, provides as follows: “Presence

subpoenaed to appear at an evidentiary hearing. See § 914.001(1), Fla. Stat. (2022) (“Subpoenas for witnesses

his trial in contravention of the provisions of § 914.01, Fla.Stat, F.S.A. The trial of this cause was

during the course of the trial violated F.S.A. § 914.01 and the accused’s right to an open and public

courtroom.2 It is the contemplation of Fla.Stat. § 914.01 and of F.Cr.P.R. 1.180 [predecessors to present

Defendant relies upon the provisions of F.S., Section 914.01(4), F.S.A., which reads as follows: “914.01

reversal of their convictions. Florida Statutes § 914.01, F.S.A. provides : “In all prosecutions for a

circumstances outlined above, were violative of § 914.01(3) FkuStat., F.S.A. (1967). See Holton v. State

presence of the defendant in violation of F.S.A. § 914.01 that constituted reversible error. The Florida