Cases from cite.case.law:

In FLORIDA RULE OF JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION, 156 So. 3d 499 (Fla. 2015)

. . . . §§ 905.17, 905.28(1), Fla. Stat. . . .

STATE v. WOMACK,, 127 So. 3d 839 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . At issue in this case is the application of section 905.28(1), Florida Statutes (2012), which provides . . . Marko, 352 So.2d 518 (Fla.1977), provides important insight into how courts should apply section 905.28 . . . Section 905.28 provides individuals who “may be exposed to criticism, scorn, or recommendations unfavorable . . . Sturgis, 453 So.2d 1179, 1182 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984) (“Section 905.28 ... does not authorize or legitimize . . . Freeport School Project, necessity is not a precise way to describe the inquiry required by section 905.28 . . .

In AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULE OF JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION, 124 So. 3d 819 (Fla. 2013)

. . . On 9Q5§§ 905.17, 905.28(1), Fla. Stat. . . .

DOE, v. PALM BEACH COUNTY FALL TERM GRAND JURY PRESENTMENT PART B,, 981 So. 2d 684 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . Appellant filed a motion in the trial court under section 905.28(1), Florida Statutes (2006), to expunge . . . Term 1995, 689 So.2d 1182 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997), Judge Gross explained the general purpose of section 905.28 . . . (1): Under section 905.28(1), where a grand jury report relating to an individual is not accompanied . . .

REPUBLIC PROPERTIES CORPORATION RPC v. GRAND JURY PRESENTMENT ON CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH, PART A, FALL TERM, 971 So. 2d 289 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . Section 905.28(1), Florida Statutes, provides: A report or presentment of the grand jury relating to . . . In support of the order’s conclusions that Republic lacks standing, the state argues that section 905.28 . . . Section 905.28(1) was enacted to protect those “whose character is impugned in a [grand jury] report . . . See id. at 520-21 (explaining that section 905.28 was “undoubtedly” enacted because, “while one charged . . . Section 905.28(1) provides the essential ‘notice and an opportunity to be heard.’ ” In re Grand Jury, . . .

ROE, v. GRAND JURY,, 970 So. 2d 498 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . Appellant timely appeals the partial denial of a motion brought under section 905.28(1), Florida Statutes . . . Appellant’s section 905.28(1) motion was directed at this portion of the report. . . . Under section 905.28(1), where a grand jury presentment relating to an individual is not accompanied . . . Something is “unlawful” within the meaning of section 905.28(1) if it is “outside the lawful ambit of . . . A matter is “improper” under section 905.28(1) if it is (1) not “germane to the scope of the proceedings . . .

Z. GERVIN, M. D. v. ANDREWS,, 826 So. 2d 504 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . See § 905.28, Fla. Stat. (2001). . . .

BARBER, v. INTERIM REPORT OF THE GRAND JURY SPRING TERM, 689 So. 2d 1182 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . The remainder of the report is not “improper or unlawful” within the meaning of section 905.28(1), Florida . . . Pursuant to section 905.28, Officer Barber filed a motion to repress or expunge the following portions . . . Under section 905.28(1), where a grand jury report relating to an individual is not accompanied by a . . . As used in section 905.28(1) “unlawful” means outside the lawful ambit of the grand jury’s authority. . . . The grand jury’s conclusion was “proper” within the meaning of section 905.28(1). . . .

In GRAND JURY INVESTIGATION OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, On-, 659 So. 2d 347 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . This is an appeal from the partial denial of a motion brought under Section 905.28(1), Florida Statutes . . . accompanies the grand jury report, no opportunity was furnished such person before the enactment of section 905.28 . . . potential for abuse of the grand jury system was precisely the reason why the legislature adopted section 905.28 . . . Project) Winter Term 1988, 544 So.2d 1104, 1107 (Fla. 1st DCA) (“[section 905.28] was designed to constitute . . . Section 905.28(1) provides: No report or presentment of the grand juiy relating to an individual which . . .

GRAND JURY FALL TERM, A. D. v. CITY OF ST. PETERSBURG, FLORIDA,, 624 So. 2d 291 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . whom it had received testimony to obviate the necessity to seal the presentment pursuant to section 905.28 . . .

In REPORT OF THE GRAND JURY, JEFFERSON COUNTY, FLORDIA, SPRING TERM,, 559 So. 2d 248 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . Authority for repression of the report of a grand jury is set forth in section 905.28, Florida Statutes . . .

MALCOLM PIRNIE, INC. v. MONROE COUNTY GRAND JURY REPORT, FALL TERM,, 558 So. 2d 139 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . This is an appeal taken pursuant to section 905.28, Florida Statutes (1987), from a trial court order . . . Section 905.28(1) provides: No report or presentment of the grand jury relating to an individual which . . . Section 905.28(1) “was not designed, in any sense to provide an appellate review of the grand jury’s . . .

In GRAND JURY PRESENTMENT, DUVAL COUNTY,, 548 So. 2d 721 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . copy the presentment due to the following rationale: The presentment is a public record as section 905.28 . . . them had been dismissed, thereby leaving them “unindicted” for purposes of the application of section 905.28 . . . Marko, 352 So.2d 518 (Fla.1977), appellants still are not entitled to repression under section 905.28 . . . Therefore, since section 905.28 relief was not available to appellants, the trial court did not impose . . . Section 905.28(1), Florida Statutes, provides: (1) No report or presentment of the grand jury relating . . .

In GRAND JURY FREEPORT SCHOOL PROJECT WINTER TERM HILTON DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, a v. C. CHANDLER,, 544 So. 2d 1104 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . This is an appeal from the denial of a motion brought under Section 905.28, Florida Statutes (1987), . . . Unfortunately, the presentment was prematurely published in violation of section 905.28. . . . Weintraub was necessary once the state unlawfully released the presentment in violation of section 905.28 . . . Section 905.28(1) authorizes expunction or repression of any statements contained in a presentment that . . . This is so because section 905.28 was not designed to provide an appellate review of the grand jury’s . . .

STATE v. In GRAND JURY, FALL TERM PRESENTMENT DATED JULY, 535 So. 2d 696 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . LeCouris, whose actions were criticized by the Grand Jury, filed a motion as contemplated by section 905.28 . . .

In GRAND JURY PRESENTMENT, 534 So. 2d 905 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . Respondents unsuccessfully urged below that the presentment could be repressed pursuant to section 905.28 . . . Review of the trial court’s ruling on the 905.28(1) motions is presently pending in the consolidated . . . Though section 905.28(2) provides that a section 905.28(1) motion acts as an automatic stay of public . . . pending appellate review by the district court of appeal, the trial court apparently felt that section 905.28 . . .

In REPORT OF THE GRAND JURY, JEFFERSON COUNTY, FLORIDA, SPRING TERM M. In, 533 So. 2d 873 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . Section 905.28, Florida Statutes (1986), authorizes a motion to repress or expunge a grand jury report . . . 352 So.2d 518 (Fla.1987), the supreme court defined “lawful” and “proper” in the context of section 905.28 . . . Section 905.28, Florida Statutes (1987). . U.S. v. Coughlan, 842 F.2d 737 (4th Cir. 1988); State v. . . .

D. MOORE, Jr. v. GRAND JURY REPORT ON PUBLIC HOUSING,, 532 So. 2d 1103 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . Section 905.28(1), Florida Statutes (1987), and challenges certain of the grand jury’s factual findings . . . HUD Agency, were furnished advance copies of the report in compliance with the provisions of Section 905.28 . . . II Section 905.28(1), Florida Statutes (1987) provides: “No report or presentment of the grand jury relating . . . circuit court properly concluded, this was an insufficient basis to repress the report under Section 905.28 . . .

In GRAND JURY, FALL TERM PINELLAS COUNTY, TRIBUNE COMPANY v. STATE, 528 So. 2d 51 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . The post-presentment events and the trial court’s order implicate section 905.28(1), Florida Statutes . . . After the presentment was sealed, consistent with section 905.28, those persons mentioned in it were . . . Notwithstanding that the procedural steps provided in section 905.28(1) are ancillary to the grand jury . . . Section 905.28(1) provides the essential “notice and an opportunity to be heard.” . . . The trial court’s application of section 905.28(1) accommodates the competing constitutional concerns . . .

SMITH, v. A. BUTTERWORTH, Jr. T. Jr., 678 F. Supp. 1552 (M.D. Fla. 1988)

. . . Further, the Florida Supreme Court has held constitutional Section 905.28(1), permitting repression of . . .

In GRAND JURY PROCEEDINGS- s H. A., 832 F.2d 554 (11th Cir. 1987)

. . . . § 905.28(1) (1985) to suppress the report. . . .

KELLY, v. E. STURGIS,, 453 So. 2d 1179 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . Section 905.28(1), Florida Statutes, enacted -in 1973, provides: No report or presentment of the grand . . . Marko, 352 So.2d 518 (Fla.1977), the supreme court construed section 905.28(1), Florida Statutes. . . . Section 905.28, Florida Statutes, does not authorize or legitimatize a grand jury making an unfair commentary . . .

R. GERLACH, v. DADE COUNTY GRAND JURY FINAL REPORT, SPRING TERM, RELATING TO DADE COUNTY METRO TRANSIT AGENCY,, 420 So. 2d 384 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . Marko, 352 So.2d 518 (Fla.1977); Sec. 905.28(1), Fla.Stat. (1981). . . .

J. UNTREINER, In ESCAMBIA COUNTY GRAND JURY, FALL TERM, s, 391 So. 2d 272 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

. . . Appellant seeks to repress the entire Presentment under Section 905.28, Fla.Stat. (1977). . . . Section 905.28(1) provides that a Grand Jury Presentment relating to an individual which is not accompanied . . .

S. PHILPITT, E. v. L. WEINTRAUB,, 377 So. 2d 247 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

. . . subject to expungement as its public release under these circumstances constitutes a violation of Section 905.28 . . . This appeal follows which we have jurisdiction to entertain. § 905.28(2), Fla.Stat. (1977). . . . II The controlling statute in this case is Section 905.28, Florida Statutes (1977), which provides as . . . follows: “905.28 PUBLICATION OF REPORT OR PRESENTMENT: MOTION TO REPRESS. (1) No report or presentment . . . We are not authorized to completely ignore the statutory scheme of Section 905.28, Florida Statutes ( . . .

GREEN, v. INVESTIGATION OF LIBERTY COUNTY SCHOOL SYSTEM- REPORT OF GRAND JURY,, 370 So. 2d 63 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

. . . This appeal is taken pursuant to Section 905.28(1), Florida Statutes (1977), from an order entered by . . .

MIAMI HERALD PUBLISHING COMPANY, a Al v. M. MARKO,, 352 So. 2d 518 (Fla. 1977)

. . . entered by the Broward County Circuit Court which initially and directly upheld the validity of Section 905.28 . . . Acting under Section 905.28(1), each patrolman timely filed a motion to repress certain portions of the . . . these reasons, the order of the trial court is affirmed insofar as it upheld the validity of Section 905.28 . . . Although subsection 905.28(2) expressly directs review of circuit court rulings under this statute in . . .

MORGAN, v. STATE, 337 So. 2d 951 (Fla. 1976)

. . . (Emphasis supplied) On the other hand, Section 905.28(1), Florida Statutes (1975), provides in pertinent . . . It is clear from the statutory scheme of Sections 905.24 through 905.28, Florida Statutes (1975), that . . . other evidence received by it (Section 905.27); and publication of the report or presentment (Section 905.28 . . . Section 905.28, Florida Statutes (1975), forbids disclosure of presentments critical of unindicted persons . . .