Cases from cite.case.law:

HODGES, v. STATE, 262 So. 3d 842 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . in which the Fourth District explained: Section 948.06(1)(f) is clear that a warrant under section 901.02 . . . Section 901.02 in turn requires that the warrant be for a "crime." . . . The warrants were therefore not issued under section 901.02, and Appellant's probation was never tolled . . . arrested on June 15, 2017, for criminal charges in Duval County pursuant to a warrant under section 901.02 . . . legislature amended section 948.06(1)(f) to remove the requirement that the warrant be issued under section 901.02 . . .

STATE v. WILLIAMS,, 260 So. 3d 472 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . dismissed, but urged the trial court to "recede" from Mobley because it improperly interpreted section 901.02 . . .

CANCHOLA, v. STATE, 255 So. 3d 442 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . That VOP affidavit is followed by (1) the "issuance of a warrant under s.901.02," (2) "a warrantless . . . of the statute, a warrant must have been issued under a probable cause standard set forth in section 901.02 . . . , whereas the 2018 version omits the reference to section 901.02. . . .

In SECURITIES INVESTOR PROTECTION CORPORATION, v. BERNARD L. MADOFF INVESTMENT SECURITIES LLC, In L., 592 B.R. 513 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2018)

. . . WEINSTEIN ET AL., WEINSTEIN'S FEDERAL EVIDENCE § 901.02[2] (2d ed. 2018) (" WEINSTEIN "). . . . evidence cannot have any probative value unless it is actually what it purports to be. 5 WEINSTEIN § 901.02 . . .

STATE v. BEERY,, 244 So. 3d 339 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . of an affidavit alleging a violation of probation ... and following issuance of a warrant under s. 901.02 . . . of probation to be tolled under this language, an arrest warrant must first be issued under section 901.02 . . . Fourth District held that the text of "[s]ection 948.06(1)(f) is clear that a warrant under section 901.02 . . .

UNITED STATES v. DELEON, a. k. a. a. k. a. a. k. a. a. k. a. a. k. a. a. k. a. a. k. a. a. k. a. a. k. a. a. k. a. a. k. a. a. k. a. a. k. a. a. k. a. a. k. a. a. k. a. a. k. a. a. k. a. a. k. a. a. k. a. a. k. a. a. k. a. Ru a. k. a., 287 F. Supp. 3d 1187 (D.N.M. 2018)

. . . Martin et al., Federal Rules of Evidence Manual § 901.02[1] ("[W]hen a witness testifies to statements . . . statements emanated so that the trier of fact is able to properly attribute the statements."); id. § 901.02 . . . Martin et al., Federal Rules of Evidence Manual § 901.02[1] ("In order for the trier of fact to make . . .

WILLIAMS, v. STATE, 202 So. 3d 917 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . We therefore must determine whether they were issued under section 901.02. . . . Section 901.02 requires that a judge be “satisfied that probable cause exists for the issuance of an . . . arrest warrant for any crime committed .... ” § 901.02 (emphasis added). . . . Section 901.02 in turn requires that the warrant be for a “crime.” . . . The warrants were therefore not issued under section 901.02, and [the defendant’s] probation was never . . .

UNITED STATES v. HASSANSHAHI,, 195 F. Supp. 3d 35 (D.D.C. 2016)

. . . Saltzburg et al., Federal Rules of Evidence Manual § 901.02[1] at 901-5-901-6 (8th ed. 2002)). . . . (which only “go to the weight of the evidence instead of its admissibility”). 5 Weinstein, supra, § 901.02 . . .

MOBLEY, v. STATE, 192 So. 3d 622 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . THAT DOES NOT ALLEGE A PROBATIONER COMMITTED A NEW CRIME BE CONSIDERED A WARRANT ISSUED UNDER SECTION 901.02 . . .

CARCAMO, v. E. LYNCH,, 648 F. App'x 306 (4th Cir. 2016)

. . . D.C.Code § 48-901.02(4). . . . D.C.Code § 48-904.01(a)(1); see id. §§ 48-901.02(4), 48-902.04, 48-902.06, 48-902.08, 48-902.10, 48-902.12 . . .

MOBLEY, v. STATE, 197 So. 3d 572 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . We therefore must determine whether they were issued under section 901.02. . . . Section 901.02 requires that a judge be “satisfied that probable cause exists for the issuance of an . . . arrest warrant for any crime committed .... ” § 901.02 (emphasis added). . . . Section 901.02 in turn requires that the warrant be for a “crime.” . . . The warrants were therefore not issued under section 901.02, and Appellant’s probation was never tolled . . .

HENNIG, v. G. PRUMMELL, Jr. Of, 198 So. 3d 17 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . . § 901.02(4), Fla. Stat. (2014); see also Morgan v. . . .

In AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 132 So. 3d 123 (Fla. 2013)

. . . (amending section 901.02, Fla. . . .

HOLLEY, v. STATE, 128 So. 3d 111 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . He contends that, based upon his reading of sections 948.06(1) and 901.02, Florida Statutes (2008), a . . .

UNITED STATES, v. D. LUBICH, U. S., 72 M.J. 170 (C.A.A.F. 2013)

. . . Berger, Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 901.02[3], at 901-13 to 901-14 (Joseph M. . . .

CHADWICK, v. STATE, 118 So. 3d 827 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . alleging a violation of probation or community control and following issuance of a warrant under s. 901.02 . . .

CAROTEK, INC. v. KOBAYASHI VENTURES, LLC v. LLC, 875 F. Supp. 2d 313 (S.D.N.Y. 2012)

. . . Berger, Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 901.02[1] (2d ed. 2012) ("An exhibit is not admissible simply . . .

UNITED STATES v. L. FOSTER, 829 F. Supp. 2d 354 (W.D. Va. 2011)

. . . Liddy, 37 Fed.Appx. 53, 63 (4th Cir.2002) (citing Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 901.02[3] (2d ed. 2001 . . .

UNITED STATES v. ISIWELE,, 635 F.3d 196 (5th Cir. 2011)

. . . Berger, Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 901.02[3], at 901-14 (Joseph M. . . . of a condition of fact and is governed by the procedure set forth in Rule 104(b).’ ” 5 Weinstein § 901.02 . . . Such flaws go to the weight of the evidence instead of its admissibility.” 5 Weinstein § 901.02[3], at . . .

R. FRANKLIN, v. STATE, 54 So. 3d 622 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . alleging a violation of probation or community control and following issuance of a warrant under s. 901.02 . . . A warrant issues “when signed by the magistrate.” § 901.02(1), Fla. Stat. (2002). . . .

UNITED STATES v. M. CAMERON, 762 F. Supp. 2d 152 (D. Me. 2011)

. . . Weinstein’s § 901.02[3]. . . .

SHENFELD, v. STATE, 44 So. 3d 96 (Fla. 2010)

. . . alleging a violation of probation or community control and following issuance of a warrant under s. 901.02 . . . alleging a violation of probation or community control and following issuance of a warrant under s. 901.02 . . .

In SECOND CHANCE BODY ARMOR, INC. n k a SCBA W. v. Co., 434 B.R. 502 (Bankr. W.D. Mich. 2010)

. . . Berger, Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 901.02[5] (2007). . . . See Fed.R.Evid. 901(a); Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 901.02[3] (“The proponent of an exhibit has the . . .

GONZALEZ- RAMOS, v. STATE, 46 So. 3d 67 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . to provide that "[u]pon the filing of an affidavit ... and following issuance of a warrant under s. 901.02 . . .

COLLIER, v. STATE, 16 So. 3d 340 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . alleging a violation of probation or community control and following issuance of a warrant under s. 901.02 . . .

RODRIGUEZ, v. STATE, 29 So. 3d 310 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . See § 901.02(2). . . .

SHENFELD, v. STATE, 14 So. 3d 1021 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . alleging a violation of probation or community control and following issuance of a warrant under s. 901.02 . . . alleging a violation of probation or community control and following issuance of a warrant under s. 901.02 . . .

CA, INC. v. SIMPLE. COM, INC. LLC. a LLC,, 780 F. Supp. 2d 196 (E.D.N.Y. 2009)

. . . Pluta, 176 F.3d 43, 49 (2d Cir.1999); 5-901 Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 901.02[3]. . . .

UNITED STATES v. PANTIC,, 308 F. App'x 731 (4th Cir. 2009)

. . . See also, Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 901.02[3] (2008) (“Generally speaking, the proponent of a proffered . . .

UNITED STATES v. VIDACAK,, 553 F.3d 344 (4th Cir. 2009)

. . . See also, Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 901.02[3] (2008) (“Generally speaking, the proponent of a proffered . . .

BARTLETT, v. STATE, 993 So. 2d 157 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . .; § 901.02, Fla. Stat. (2006); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.120; Johnson v. . . .

E. MONCADA, v. E. PETERS,, 579 F. Supp. 2d 46 (D.D.C. 2008)

. . . Berger, Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 901.02[2] at 901-11 (2008). . Thus, Mr. . . .

BAREFIELD, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, BAKERSFIELD,, 500 F. Supp. 2d 1244 (E.D. Cal. 2007)

. . . been authenticated with regard to all parties. 5 Weinstein & Berger, Weinstein’s Federal Evidence, § 901.02 . . .

JONES, v. STATE, 964 So. 2d 167 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . of an affidavit alleging a violation of probation ... and following issuance of a warrant under s. 901.02 . . .

R. LORRAINE v. MARKEL AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY,, 241 F.R.D. 534 (D. Md. 2007)

. . . Weinstein at § 901.02[2]. . . . Id. at § 901.02[3]. This is not a particularly high barrier to overcome. . . . Saltzburg at § 901.02[12]. . . . Id. at § 901.02[12], Courts also have recognized that exhibits of chat room conversations may be authenticated . . . Joseph at 21; see also Saltzburg at § 901.02[12], . Id. at 22. . . . .

UNITED STATES v. SAFAVIAN,, 435 F. Supp. 2d 36 (D.D.C. 2006)

. . . See 5 Saltzburg, Martin & Capra, Federal Rules of Evidence Manual § 901.02[1] at 901-5 (8th ed.2002). . . . reasonably find that the evidence is what the proponent says it is.” 5 Federal Rules of Evidence Manual § 901.02 . . . See 5 Federal Rules of Evidence Manual § 901.02[1] at 901-5-901-6 (8th ed.2002); id. at 901-14 (“Evidence . . .

JEAN- GILLES, v. STATE, 921 So. 2d 860 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . alleging a violation of probation or community control and following issuance of a warrant under s. 901.02 . . .

CRAIN, v. STATE, 914 So. 2d 1015 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . alleging a violation of probation or community control and following issuance of a warrant under s. 901.02 . . . Because section 901.02, Florida Statutes, specifically governs the issuance of arrest warrants, section . . . In response to the decision in Boyd, the Legislature amended section 901.02(1), Florida Statutes, to . . . Nevertheless, the amendment to section 901.02(1) did not change the holding in Boyd that the triggering . . .

SEPULVEDA, v. STATE, 909 So. 2d 568 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . alleging a violation of probation or community control and following issuance of a warrant under s. 901.02 . . . Under section 901.02(1), the warrant is issued when the judge signs it. Morgan v. . . .

BAROULETTE, v. McCRAY,, 904 So. 2d 575 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . alleging a violation of probation or community control and following issuance of a warrant under s. 901.02 . . .

APONTE, v. STATE, 896 So. 2d 836 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . See § 901.02(1), Fla. . . .

FRYE, v. STATE, 885 So. 2d 419 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . alleging a violation of probation or community control and following issuance of a warrant under s. 901.02 . . .

AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE, THE FLORIDA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, THE FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, THE FLORIDA FAMILY LAW RULES OF PROCEDURE, THE FLORIDA RULES OF JUVENILE PROCEDURE, AND THE FLORIDA PROBATE RULES, 887 So. 2d 1090 (Fla. 2004)

. . . Committee Notes 1968 Adoption, (a) This is substantially the same as section 901.02, Florida Statutes . . .

HOWARD, v. STATE, 883 So. 2d 879 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . .” § 901.02(1), Fla. Stat. (2002). . . .

In GEORGE In v. J., 361 F.3d 1157 (9th Cir. 2004)

. . . . § 23-901.02 . 11 U.S.C. § 507(a)(8)(E). . See 43 C.F.R. §§ 2881.3, 2920.1-2, 9239.1-2. . . . .

In GEORGE In v. J., 361 F.3d 1157 (9th Cir. 2004)

. . . . § 23-901.02 . 11 U.S.C. § 507(a)(8)(E). . See 43 C.F.R. §§ 2881.3, 2920.1-2, 9239.1-2. . . . .

C. BONNER, v. STATE, 866 So. 2d 163 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . alleging a violation of probation or community control and following issuance of a warrant under s. 901.02 . . .

D. HARRIS, a k a v. STATE, 854 So. 2d 703 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . alleging a violation of probation or community control and following issuance of a warrant under s. 901.02 . . .

MARIJUANA POLICY PROJECT, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BOARD OF ELECTIONS AND ETHICS,, 191 F. Supp. 2d 196 (D.D.C. 2002)

. . . See D.C.Code § 48-901.02, et seq. . . .

WELLS, v. G. LIDDY,, 37 F. App'x 53 (4th Cir. 2002)

. . . See Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 901.02[3] (2d ed. 2001) (“Generally speaking, the proponent of a proffered . . . Branch, 970 F.2d 1368, 1370 (4th Cir.1992); Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 901.02[3] (2d ed. 2001) (“ . . .

MORGAN, v. STATE, 757 So. 2d 618 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . Under § 901.02(1), Florida Statutes (1999), which is prospective in application, a warrant is issued . . .

A. SLINGBAUM, v. STATE, 751 So. 2d 89 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . See § 901.02(1), Fla. Stat. (1999). . . .

JOHN BEAUDETTE, INC. v. SENTRY INSURANCE A MUTUAL COMPANY,, 94 F. Supp. 2d 77 (D. Mass. 1999)

. . . Weinstein Wein-stein's Federal Evidence § 901.02[2] (1999) (Rule 901 satisfied if proponent makes sufficient . . . Weinstein Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 901.02[4] (1999). . . .

McNEAL, v. STATE, 741 So. 2d 1205 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . Chapter 99-169 amends section 901.02(1), Florida Statutes (1997), to add the sentence, “A warrant is . . . expressly states that the amendment will affect future cases only: The first amendment [to section 901.02 . . .

ROSHKIND, v. ROSHKIND,, 717 So. 2d 524 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . The State argues that sections 901.02 and 901.04, Florida Statutes (1991), establish that a judicial . . . Section 901.02, Florida Statutes (1991), provides: A warrant may be issued for the arrest of the person . . .

H. MURPHY, Jr. v. STATE, 627 So. 2d 51 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . arrest warrant was issued without probable cause or was otherwise legally defective as to form, see § 901.02 . . .

PEREZ, v. STATE, 620 So. 2d 1256 (Fla. 1993)

. . . See generally §§ 901.02, .15, Fla.Stat. (1989). . . .

In AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 606 So. 2d 227 (Fla. 1992)

. . . Committee Notes 1968 Adoption, (a) This is substantially the same as section 901.02, Florida Statutes . . .

FLORIDA MINING MATERIALS CORPORATION, v. CITY OF PORT ORANGE,, 518 So. 2d 311 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . . § 901.02 REVIEW CRITERIA AND REQUIREMENTS: When reviewing an application for special exception, the . . .

BUTLER v. CITY OF VERO BEACH R. T., 495 So. 2d 266 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . reasonable belief that the person complained against has committed the offense, as required by Section 901.02 . . .

R. BURNS, v. GCC BEVERAGES, INC. a d b a, 469 So. 2d 806 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . reasonable belief that the person complained against has committed the offense, as required by Section 901.02 . . .

STATE v. S. MASTROPANAGIOTIS,, 251 So. 2d 726 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1971)

. . . Florida Statutes § 901.02, 1969, F.S.A. provides: “When warrant of arrest to be issued.— A warrant may . . .

SHAHEEN, v. STATE, 228 So. 2d 444 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1969)

. . . Indeed, Florida Statutes Section 901.02 (1967), F.S.A. authorizes a magistrate to issue a warrant if . . .

LUND, 376 F.2d 982 (C.C.P.A. 1967)

. . . Wash.Law Review 73 (Oct. 1950) Manual of Patent Examining Procedure, §§ 901.02, 901.01 . . .

In, 54 C.C.P.A. 1361 (C.C.P.A. 1967)

. . . Law Review 73 (Oct. 1950) Manual of Patent Examining Procedure, §§ 901.02, 901.01 . . .

In FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 196 So. 2d 124 (Fla. 1967)

. . . Committee Note: (a) This is substantially the same as 901.02, except that the rule requires a written . . .

KIRKLAND v. H. PRESTON, 385 F.2d 670 (D.C. Cir. 1967)

. . . . §§ 901.01-901.02, F.S.A. (1944); Ill.Ann.Stat. 38, § 107-9 (1964); Ariz. . . .

UNITED STATES v. MELVIN, 258 F. Supp. 252 (S.D. Fla. 1966)

. . . The Florida Statute (§ 901.02) F.S.A. authorizes an arrest warrant to be issued “if the magistrate, from . . .

In O NEILL, 9 Fla. Supp. 153 (Dade Cty. Cir. Ct. 1956)

. . . Section 901.02, Florida Statutes, 1955, 3 Fla. Jur., Arrest, pp. 48-49; Conrad v. Van Buren, Cir. . . .

STATE OF FLORIDA DAISY WILSON, v. H. LESLIE QUIGG, a, 154 Fla. 348 (Fla. 1944)

. . . Section 901.02 deals with “when warrant of arrest to be issued;” Section 901.03 prescribes the form and . . .