Cases from cite.case.law:

BRAYSHAW, v. CITY OF TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA, 709 F. Supp. 2d 1244 (N.D. Fla. 2010)

. . . Stat. § 843.17. III. ANALYSIS A. . . . Thus, Plaintiffs speech, and that proscribed by § 843.17, is protected by the First Amendment. . . . Additionally, § 843.17 on its face is a content-based restriction on speech. . . . Section 843.17 is clearly content-based, as it restricts speech based its subject. . . . Section 843.17 fails to further the state? . . .

NICOR INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION a k a v. EL PASO CORPORATION f k a El, 318 F. Supp. 2d 1160 (S.D. Fla. 2004)

. . . (unlawful use of police communications); § 843.17, Fla. Stat. . . .

PATRICK COAL CORPORATION, v. OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING RECLAMATION AND ENFORCEMENT, 661 F. Supp. 380 (W.D. Va. 1987)

. . . . § 843.17 specifically states that “[n]o notice of violation, cessation order ... may be vacated for . . .