Florida/Georgia Personal Injury & Workers Compensation

You're probably overthinking it. Call a lawyer.

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 766.208 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 766.208 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 766.208 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 766.208

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XLV
TORTS
Chapter 766
MEDICAL MALPRACTICE AND RELATED MATTERS
View Entire Chapter
766.208 Arbitration to allocate responsibility among multiple defendants.
(1) The provisions of this section shall apply when more than one defendant has participated in voluntary binding arbitration pursuant to s. 766.207.
(2) Within 20 days after the determination of damages by the arbitration panel in the first arbitration proceeding, those defendants who have agreed to voluntary binding arbitration shall submit any dispute among them regarding the apportionment of financial responsibility to a separate binding arbitration proceeding. Such proceeding shall be with a panel of three arbitrators, which panel shall consist of the administrative law judge who presided in the first arbitration proceeding, who shall serve as the chief arbitrator, and two medical practitioners appointed by the defendants, except that if a hospital licensed pursuant to chapter 395 is involved in the arbitration proceeding, one arbitrator appointed by the defendants shall be a certified hospital risk manager. In the event the defendants cannot agree on their selection of arbitrators within 20 days after the determination of damages by the arbitration panel in the first arbitration proceeding, a list of not more than five nominees shall be submitted by each defendant to the director of the Division of Administrative Hearings, who shall select the other arbitrators but shall not select more than one from the list of nominees of any defendant.
(3) The administrative law judge appointed to serve as the chief arbitrator shall convene the arbitrators for the purpose of determining allocation of responsibility among multiple defendants within 65 days after the determination of damages by the arbitration panel in the first arbitration proceeding.
(4) The arbitration panel shall allocate financial responsibility among all defendants named in the notice of intent to initiate litigation, regardless of whether the defendant has submitted to arbitration. The defendants in the arbitration proceeding shall pay their proportionate share of the economic and noneconomic damages awarded by the arbitration panel. All defendants in the arbitration proceeding shall be jointly and severally liable for any damages assessed in arbitration. The determination of the percentage of fault of any defendant not in the arbitration case shall not be binding against that defendant, nor shall it be admissible in any subsequent legal proceeding.
(5) Payment by the defendants of the damages awarded by the arbitration panel in the first arbitration proceeding shall extinguish those defendants’ liability to the claimant and shall also extinguish those defendants’ liability for contribution to any defendants who did not participate in arbitration.
(6) Any defendant paying damages assessed pursuant to this section or s. 766.207 shall have an action for contribution against any nonarbitrating person whose negligence contributed to the injury.
History.s. 55, ch. 88-1; s. 31, ch. 88-277; s. 305, ch. 96-410.

F.S. 766.208 on Google Scholar

F.S. 766.208 on CourtListener

Amendments to 766.208


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 766.208

Total Results: 3  |  Sort by: Relevance  |  Newest First

Copy

Rell v. McCulla, 101 So. 3d 878 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012).

Cited 9 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2012 WL 4841360, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 17688

...borating medical expert opinion must provide sufficient notice of how the defendant doctor deviated from the standard of care and must provide adequate information to allow for full evaluation of the merits of the claim). Because the requirements of section 766.208(2) were not met, the trial court departed from the essential requirements of the law when it failed to grant Dr....
Copy

Holmes Reg'l Med. Ctr., Inc. v. Wirth, 49 So. 3d 802 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 17190, 35 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2505

negligent and that negligence resulted in injury. § 766.208(2). After conducting this investigation, the plaintiff
Copy

Chester v. Doig, 842 So. 2d 106 (Fla. 2003).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 28 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 126, 2003 Fla. LEXIS 164, 2003 WL 252142

...e Act. See St. Mary’s Hospital, 769 So.2d at 973 . Because the Legislature has not done so, we conclude the arbitration award should not be set off by the settlement award in this case. We also note, reading further into the statutory scheme, that section 766.208(6), Florida Statutes (1997), provides: Arbitration to allocate responsibility among multiple defendants.— [[Image here]] (6) Any defendant paying damages assessed pursuant to this section or s....

This Florida statute resource is curated by Graham W. Syfert, Esq., a Jacksonville, Florida personal injury and workers' compensation attorney. Attorney Syfert regularly works with Chapter 766 in the context of medical malpractice litigation and represents clients throughout Northeast Florida. For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.