The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . Section 751.05 requires the trial court to conduct a hearing on the petition and requires the court to . . . forth in the petition, and the objections or other testimony of the child's parents, if present." § 751.05 . . . or concurrent custody of the child to the petitioner if it is in the best interest of the child." § 751.05 . . . have abused, abandoned, or neglected the child, as defined in chapter 39, Florida Statutes (2017). § 751.05 . . .
. . . . § 751.05(3), Fla. Stat. (2006). . . . See generally § 751.05, Fla. Stat. (2006). . . .
. . . Section 751.05(3)(b), governs a temporary custody request by an extended family member over the objection . . .
. . . an opportunity to be heard must be provided before any decree is made under sections 751.01 through 751.05 . . . demonstrate his fitness to be a parent or her consent to change the temporary custody, pursuant to section 751.05 . . . Those criteria apply to petitions to change custody. § 751.05(6), Fla. Stat. (2008). . . .
. . . . § 751.05(6), Fla. Stat. . . . See § 751.05(6), Fla. . . .
. . . . § 751.05(3)(b), Fla. Stat. . . . the child’s currently more stable environment, might be sustainable under a best interest standard. § 751.05 . . . even if opposed by a child’s current caretakers for good reasons, if the parent is deemed “fit.” § 751.05 . . . See § 751.05(6), Fla. Stat. (2018). . . . Section 751.05(6) provides in pertinent part that the trial court “shall terminate the [temporary custody . . . parent is a fit parent .... ” The term “fit parent” is not defined, but another provision of section 751.05 . . . “unfit” if the parent has “abused, abandoned, or neglected the child, as defined in chapter 39.” § 751.05 . . . (6) “embraced” this rule); but of § 751.05(6), Fla. . . .
. . . However, section 751.04 entitles the parents of the minor child to notice, and section 751.05 contemplates . . . Section 751.05(1) provides: "At the hearing on the petition for temporary or concurrent custody, the . . .
. . . Section 751.05 provides, in pertinent part: (1) At the hearing on the petition for temporary custody, . . . See § 751.05(3); K.N.B. v. . . . custody to a grandmother when, among other things, “the court failed to make findings required by section 751.05 . . . court’s order did not address the mother’s entitlement to visitation with her child even though section 751.05 . . .
. . . Specifically, in chapter 2010-30, the legislature amended sections 751.01, 751.011, 751.02, 751.03, and 751.05 . . .
. . . Further, section 751.05 states in pertinent part: (1) At the hearing on the petition for temporary custody . . . failed to conduct a hearing and give the mother an opportunity to be heard, as required by sections 751.05 . . . (4) and (5); and (4) the court failed to make findings required by section 751.05. . . . See § 751.05(7). . . . .
. . . Bedford Heights, § 351.06 (1970) Bellbrook, § 452.08 Bellvue, § 351.06 (2002) Belpre, § 351.06 Berea, § 751.05 . . .
. . . judgment dismissing their emergency petition for temporary custody of a minor child pursuant to section 751.05 . . . principal, J.A., and others, seeking to establish that the appellees had abandoned J. pursuant to section 751.05 . . . the court to determine the issue of whether the appellees were “unfit” parents pursuant to section 751.05 . . .
. . . . § 751.05(3), Fla. Stat. (2001) (emphasis added). In Richardson v. . . . See § 751.05(3). . . . While section 751.05(1) provides for an evidentiary hearing on the issue of temporary custody, here the . . .
. . . The Legislature embraced the parental preference rule when it enacted section 751.05(7), Florida Statutes . . . the parent requesting the termination of the order is a fit parent, or by consent of the parties. § 751.05 . . .
. . . See § 751.05(3), Glockson v. Manna, 711 So.2d 1332 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998). . . .
. . . See § 751.05(7). . . . .
. . . Section 751.05(3) specifies that an award of temporary custody to an extended family member over the . . .
. . . During the taxable years 1919 and 1920, the taxpayer spent, respectively, $313.40 and $751.05, in connection . . .
. . . mentioned in Finding VI, bills No. 3377 and No. 4001, on which the differences shown above are $160.10 and $751.05 . . .