Cases from cite.case.law:

D. M. J. v. A. J. T., 190 So. 3d 1129 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . See 742.09, Fla. Stát. (2015). ’ . . . .

HOUSTON, v. U. S. BANK HOME MORTGAGE WISCONSIN SERVICING, a U. S. NA,, 505 F. App'x 543 (6th Cir. 2012)

. . . US Bank’s statement to Houston, dated July 17, 2009, indicated that she owed a current payment of $742.09 . . . The past-due amount of $2,226.27 is equal to three payments of $742.09. . . . On the record presented, neither Houston nor the Trustee made monthly payments of $742.09 for April, . . . Houston comes closest in her QWR to disputing specifically the $742.09 amount when she requested "an . . . explanation of how the amount due on the Monthly Billing Statement ($742.09) was calculated.” . . .

HOUSTON, v. U. S. BANK HOME MORTGAGE WISCONSIN SERVICING, a U. S. NA,, 505 F. App'x 543 (6th Cir. 2012)

. . . US Bank’s statement to Houston, dated July 17, 2009, indicated that she owed a current payment of $742.09 . . . The past-due amount of $2,226.27 is equal to three payments of $742.09. . . . On the record presented, neither Houston nor the Trustee made monthly payments of $742.09 for April, . . . Houston comes closest in her QWR to disputing specifically the $742.09 amount when she requested "an . . . explanation of how the amount due on the Monthly Billing Statement ($742.09) was calculated." . . .

G. W. v. RUSHING,, 22 So. 3d 819 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . Consistent with the legislative intent to protect the anonymity of parties to such actions, § 742.09, . . .

T. B. v. M. M., 945 So. 2d 637 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . Further, we note that section 742.09 l's language about dismissing the paternity action seems to assume . . .

DOE v. AMERICAN LAWYER MEDIA, L. P. d b a a, 639 So. 2d 1021 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . that the newspaper published her real name as a party to a paternity action in violation of section 742.09 . . .

In S. JONES,, 121 B.R. 122 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1990)

. . . Interest is accruing on note 1 at $742.09 per day. . . .

REITER, v. MASON, a k a, 563 So. 2d 749 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . Mason primarily relies on section 742.09, Florida Statutes (1989), as authority for the trial court order . . .

SENTINEL COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, v. D. C. SMITH,, 493 So. 2d 1048 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . . § 63.162(2), Fla.Stat. (1985); § 742.09, Fla.Stat. (1985); § 39.12, Fla.Stat. (1985); cf. . . .

GADSDEN COUNTY TIMES, INC. a v. C. WILLIS,, 377 So. 2d 817 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

. . . despite the illegality of publishing of names of parties to paternity actions as provided in Section 742.09 . . . closure would in fact achieve the objects sought to be accomplished by the order; and (3) that Section 742.09 . . . administrative order seems to be the desire of the Chief Judge to implement the requirements of Section 742.09 . . . As for petitioner’s argument concerning the constitutionality of Section 742.09, Florida Statutes, it . . .

MANUFACTURERS HANOVER TRUST COMPANY, v. UNITED STATES, 410 F.2d 767 (Ct. Cl. 1969)

. . . Wood’s death for $160,-742.09, the equitable title was in his legatees, and when distribution was made . . .