CopyCited 2 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal
...Appellant Floyd Coggins' recorded affidavit, reciting the existence of agreements by others to convey to him the land here contested, was not an instrument entitled to recordation as constructive notice to other potential buyers because the instrument contained no sworn acknowledgment of the vendors. Section 696.01, Florida Statutes (1977)....
CopyPublished | Supreme Court of Florida | 1970 Fla. LEXIS 2442
Mexico. “4. That at the time of the action, Florida Statute
696.01, F.S.A., [‘No contract, agreement, or other
CopyAgo (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1975).
Published | Florida Attorney General Reports
Your question is answered in the negative. Section
696.01, F.S., provides: No contract, agreement, or
CopyPublished | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 500, 2007 WL 120043
...Thus, the trial court appears to have concluded that, subsequent to foreclosure judgment, the Gaglianos could not have conveyed a lease superior to the Barzanos’ rights in the property. Alternatively, the court appears to have reasoned that the Barzanos subsequent quitclaim title took priority over the lease under section 696.01, because the lease was not recorded....
CopyPublished | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal
...We affirm on the appeal, but reverse in part on the cross-appeal. Appellant's counterclaim for slander of title was predicated on appellee's recording of an unacknowledged copy of the contract after the originally scheduled closing did not take place. Because Section 696.01, Florida Statutes (1981), requires that such a contract be acknowledged by the vendor, the contract was not entitled to be recorded....
