Cases from cite.case.law:

BRICKELL MOTORS, LLC, v. TORRES,, 257 So. 3d 563 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . Section 682.03(1)(a), Florida Statutes, mandates that "[o]n motion of a person showing an agreement to . . . Arbitration when it is either properly noticed or briefed, consistent with the requirements of section 682.03 . . .

DARDEN RESTAURANTS, INC. a St. v. OSTANNE,, 255 So. 3d 382 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . compel arbitration 'unless it finds that there is no enforceable agreement to arbitrate.' ") (citing § 682.03 . . .

GOMEZ, v. S I PROPERTIES, LLC LLC,, 220 So. 3d 539 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . .” § 682.03(7), Fla. Stat. (2016). . . .

FOUCHE, v. PILOT CATASTROPHE SERVICES, INC., 217 So. 3d 225 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . Pursuant to section 682.03 of the Florida Statutes, the imposition of a stay, not an order of dismissal . . . The statute reads, in pertinent part, as follows: 682.03. . . . . § 682.03(7), Fla. Stat. (2015). . . . remanded with instructions to send the matter to arbitration and to stay the litigation, citing to section 682.03 . . .

TIMBER PINES PLAZA, LLC, v. ZABRZYSKI B., 211 So. 3d 1147 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . See § 682.03(7), Fla. . . .

ANGELS SENIOR LIVING AT CONNERTON COURT, LLC LLC, v. G. GUNDRY, E., 210 So. 3d 257 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . Section 682.03(1), Florida Statutes (2005), author-fees an ‘application to the court’ to proceed with . . . Section 682.03 has been substantially revised. See ch. 2013-232, § 8, at 2751-52, Laws of Fla. . . .

AMERICAN EAGLE VETERAN CONTRACTING, LLC, v. D. EILAND, 201 So. 3d 829 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . . § 682.03, Fla. Stat. (2014). . . .

CIRRUS HOLDINGS USA, LLC d b a v. WELCH,, 199 So. 3d 558 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . Section 682.03, Florida Statutes (2015), states that if one party files a motion “showing an agreement . . . order the parties to arbitrate unless it finds that there is no enforceable agreement to arbitrate.” § 682.03 . . . See § 682.03(7), Fla. Stat. . . .

AMERICAN MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. v. MERCED,, 186 So. 3d 612 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . See § 682.03(l)(b), Fla. Stat. (2010); Linden v. . . .

COX, v. VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA,, 185 So. 3d 601 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . Section 682.03, Florida Statutes (2012), provides: (1) A party to an agreement or provision for arbitration . . . Specifically, under section 682.03, a trial court may consider only three issues: “(1) whether a valid . . . in this case, including filing a motion to compel arbitration in the trial court pursuant to section 682.03 . . .

CT LLC, v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS LATINOAMERICA MIAMI, INC., 201 So. 3d 85 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . Section 682.03(1) of the pre-2013 Florida Statutes provides: A party to an agreement or provision for . . .

ARRASOLA, v. MGP MOTOR HOLDINGS, LLC,, 172 So. 3d 508 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . .” § 682.03(l)(b), Fla. Stat. (2014). . . .

LAQUER, v. FALCONE,, 165 So. 3d 19 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . On remand, the trial court stayed the cross-claims, pursuant to section 682.03, Florida Statutes (2013 . . .

ESTATE OF A. WILLIAMS, v. F. JURSINSKI, P. A. P. A., 160 So. 3d 500 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . reasoning that because its jurisdiction had been invoked by Jursinski’s motion to compel under section 682.03 . . . longer exercise its right to file a voluntary dismissal in light of the mandatory provisions of section 682.03 . . . Section 682.03(6), in turn, provides that “[i]f a party makes a motion to the court to order arbitration . . .

APR ENERGY, LLC, a v. FIRST INVESTMENT GROUP CORPORATION, a a k a a, 88 F. Supp. 3d 1300 (M.D. Fla. 2015)

. . . requests an order compelling arbitration and attendant relief pursuant to Florida Statutes section 682.03 . . .

J. SHERWOOD a k a v. SLAZINSKI LLC, 162 So. 3d 229 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . Section 682.03 addresses proceedings to compel and to stay arbitration. As previously noted, Dr. . . .

HOUND MOUNDS, INC. v. FINCH,, 153 So. 3d 368 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . . § 682.03(4), Fla. Stat. (2010). . . .

GREENBROOK NH, LLC K. E. As v. ESTATE OF M. SAYRE, M. RAYMOND,, 150 So. 3d 878 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . See § 682.03, Fla. Stat. (2010) (delineating “[proceedings to compel and to stay arbitration”). . . .

VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION OF FLORIDA, INC. v. JUPITER MEDICAL CENTER, INC., 154 So. 3d 1115 (Fla. 2014)

. . . provision for arbitration subject to this law, unless the matter was determined in proceedings under s. 682.03 . . .

APR ENERGY, LLC, a v. FIRST INVESTMENT GROUP CORPORATION, a a k a a, 51 F. Supp. 3d 1227 (M.D. Fla. 2014)

. . . requests an order compelling arbitration and attendant relief pursuant to Florida Statutes section 682.03 . . .

M. SNELL v. MOTT S CONTRACTING SERVICES, INC., 141 So. 3d 605 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . See, e.g., §§ 682.03, .04, .06, .08-.10, .12-.14. . . .

BASULTO, v. HIALEAH AUTOMOTIVE,, 141 So. 3d 1145 (Fla. 2014)

. . . . § 682.03(1), Fla. Stat. (2004). . . . We also note that effective July 1, 2013, the Florida Legislature revised section 682.03. . . . arbitrate, it may not order the parties to arbitrate pursuant to subsection (1) or subsection (2).... § 682.03 . . .

B. GREN, L. III, v. GREN, L. II L. II, 133 So. 3d 1066 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . Seifert, 750 So.2d at 636; § 682.03, Fla. Stat. (2012). . . .

SPIVEY, v. TEEN CHALLENGE OF FLORIDA, INC. a, 122 So. 3d 986 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . Challenge filed a motion to compel mediation/arbitration and to dismiss the complaint pursuant to section 682.03 . . . and determine the issue and, according to its determination, shall grant or deny the application. § 682.03 . . . Even if section 682.03(1) applied to this determination, the trial court’s conclusion that no substantial . . . enforceable arbitration agreement exists the court shall proceed "summarily to decide the issue.” § 682.03 . . .

FI- EVERGREEN WOODS, LLC, N K A LLC, LLC v. L. ROBINSON,, 135 So. 3d 331 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . . § 682.03(1), Fla. Stat. (2012) (emphasis added). . . . We have previously indicated that “[t]he clear wording of [section 682.03(1) ] requires the trial court . . . Accordingly, the lower court should have conducted an evidentiary hearing pursuant to section 682.03( . . . The plain language of section 682.03 no longer contains the term “hear.” Compare § 682.03(1), Fla. . . . Stat. (2012) ("[The court] shall summarily hear and determine the issue ....”), with § 682.03(l)(b), . . .

N. WELLS O. v. CASTRO,, 117 So. 3d 1233 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . provision for arbitration subject to this law, unless the matter was determined in proceedings under s. 682.03 . . .

FI- EVERGREEN WOODS, LLC, v. ESTATE OF A. VRASTIL,, 118 So. 3d 859 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . the motion to compel arbitration without first holding an evidentiary hearing, as required by section 682.03 . . . and determine the issue and, according to its determination, shall grant or deny the application. § 682.03 . . . granted, but if, as here, there is a “substantial issue,” then at least a summary hearing is needed. § 682.03 . . . It was error to fail to hold the hearing required by section 682.03(1). . . .

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. v. J. PHILLIPS,, 126 So. 3d 186 (Fla. 2013)

. . . In particular, section 682.03(4) provides as follows: “On application the court may stay an arbitration . . . exists between the party making the application and the party causing the arbitration to be had.” § 682.03 . . .

JOSSFOLK, v. UNITED PROPERTY CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY,, 110 So. 3d 110 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . provision for arbitration subject to this law, unless the matter was determined in proceedings under s. 682.03 . . .

MARCUM LLP, v. POTAMKIN,, 107 So. 3d 1193 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . We discern no such intention in section 682.03(4) or any other provision of the Florida Arbitration Code . . .

IBIS LAKES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. v. IBIS ISLE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., 102 So. 3d 722 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . for a party to apply to the court for an order compelling or staying arbitration pursuant to section 682.03 . . . and determine the issue and, according to its determination, shall grant or deny the application. § 682.03 . . .

AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE, COUNTY, v. MIAMI- DADE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS,, 95 So. 3d 388 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . provision for arbitration subject to this law, unless the matter was determined in proceedings under s. 682.03 . . .

QUESADA, v. CITY OF TAMPA,, 96 So. 3d 924 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . provision for arbitration subject to this law, unless the matter was determined in proceedings under s. 682.03 . . .

BEST, v. EDUCATION AFFILIATES, INC. d b a, 82 So. 3d 143 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . Section 682.03 provides that once a party has filed a motion to compel arbitration, If the court is satisfied . . . and determine the issue and, according to its determination, shall grant or deny the application. § 682.03 . . .

HOPEWELL, LLC, a III, IV, v. ALARION BANK,, 84 So. 3d 1073 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . See § 682.03(1), (3), Fla. Stat. (2010); Rittman v. Allstate Ins. . . .

MARSHALL, AMAYA ANTON, v. ARNOLD- DOBAL, D. O., 76 So. 3d 998 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . waiver of the right to arbitrate, the trial court should have followed the requirements of section 682.03 . . .

SPEEGLE CONSTRUCTION, COMPANY, INC. v. DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF NORTHWEST FLORIDA STATE COLLEGE, a, 75 So. 3d 360 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . eventually receded from that position and filed a petition to stay arbitration pursuant to section 682.03 . . .

WALLSHEIN, M. D. v. G. SHUGARMAN, M. D., 50 So. 3d 89 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . circuit court erred because it did not conduct an expedited evidentiary hearing pursuant to section 682.03 . . . Subsection 682.03(1) provides that a party to an arbitration agreement may apply to a court for an order . . .

FL- CARROLLWOOD CARE CENTER, LLC LLC LLC v. JARAMILLO, Sr. WKTM- LLC CSE SNF LLC, 36 So. 3d 180 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . “Section 682.03(1), Florida Statutes [ (2008) ], furnishes a guide to the procedure that the trial court . . . and determine the issue and, according to its determination, shall grant or deny the application. § 682.03 . . .

FL- CARROLLWOOD CARE CENTER, LLC, a k a FL- LLC LLC LLC L. a k a H. a k a H. a k a v. ESTATE OF GORDON, Sr. GORDON,, 34 So. 3d 804 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . Section 682.03(1), Florida Statutes (2007), provides as follows: A party to an agreement or provision . . .

GENCOM GROUP, v. GARCIA STROMBERG, LLC,, 34 So. 3d 170 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . Gencom filed an action in circuit court under subsection 682.03(4), Florida Statutes (2009), seeking . . . Stat. § 682.03(4) (2009). The trial court conducted a hearing. . . .

KING S ACADEMY, INC. a v. DOE, a Sr., 29 So. 3d 439 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . non-final order, the trial court, without holding an evidentiary hearing as required under section 682.03 . . . Section 682.03(1) states: A party to an agreement or provision for arbitration subject to this law claiming . . . Healthcare of Boynton Beach L.L.C., 8 So.3d 449, 450-51 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009), this court, relying on section 682.03 . . . unconscionability challenge was “mandatory in nature,” as “Florida courts have determined that [section 682.03 . . . The trial court, under section 682.03(1), was therefore required to hold an evidentiary hearing on the . . .

AVATAR PROPERTIES, INC. a a v. GREETHAM, a, 27 So. 3d 764 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . This is not a case where the trial court can enter an order compelling arbitration pursuant to section 682.03 . . .

WHITEHEAD, M. D. M. D. s LLP, v. SMITH, 23 So. 3d 1281 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . See §§ 682.03-.04, Fla. Stat. (2007). . . .

CRYSTAL MOTOR CAR COMPANY OF HERNANDO, LLC, v. BAILEY,, 24 So. 3d 789 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . Section 682.03 of the Florida Statutes governs proceedings to compel arbitration. . . . The statute reads, in pertinent part: 682.03. . . .

JAYLENE, INC. U. a k a a k a LLC LLC ACMC- CNH, F. a k a a k a a k a a k a a k a a k a a k a f k a v. STEUER, PARADISE, In-, 22 So. 3d 711 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . provision for arbitration subject to this law, unless the matter was determined in proceedings under s. 682.03 . . .

JOHNSON, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL BURNS, LLP, a v. FORIER, LLC, a PLR LLC, a LLC, a LLC, a, 19 So. 3d 452 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . for rehearing and requested an expedited evidentiary hearing on its motion in accordance with section 682.03 . . .

COMMERCIAL INTERIORS CORPORATION OF BOCA RATON, A v. PINKERTON LAWS, INC. A, 19 So. 3d 1062 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . for arbitration subject to this law, unless the matter was determined in a proceeding under section 682.03 . . .

PRESCOTT ARCHITECTS, INC. v. LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY,, 638 F. Supp. 2d 1317 (N.D. Fla. 2009)

. . . . § 682.03, governing arbitration, to compel appraisals, and courts generally treat appraisal clauses . . .

CURCIO v. SOVEREIGN HEALTHCARE OF BOYNTON BEACH L. L. C. d b a, 8 So. 3d 449 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . Because the trial court failed to conduct an evidentiary hearing pursuant to section 682.03(1), Florida . . . The trial judge did not hold an evidentiary hearing under section 682.03(1), Florida Statutes, to resolve . . . Section 682.03(1), Florida Statutes, states: A party to an agreement or provision for arbitration subject . . . and determine the issue and, according to its determination, shall grant or deny the application. § 682.03 . . .

A. TOIBERMAN, v. J. TISERA,, 998 So. 2d 4 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . provision for arbitration subject to this law, unless the matter was determined in proceedings under s. 682.03 . . .

OLSON ELECTRIC CO. INC. v. WINTER PARK REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY,, 987 So. 2d 178 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . See § 682.03, Fla. Stat. (2007). . . .

OPEN MRI OF OKEECHOBEE, LLC, S. T. R. v. ALDANA,, 969 So. 2d 589 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . We reject appellants’ argument that section 682.03(3), Florida Statutes (2006), mandates that a stay . . . See § 682.03(1), Fla. . . . an appeal may be taken from “[a]n order denying an application to compel arbitration made under s. 682.03 . . . To read section 682.03(3) as broadly as appellants urge would be to nullify the legislative direction . . .

OPERIS GROUP, CORP. v. E. I. AT DORAL, LLC,, 973 So. 2d 485 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . WHETHER A VALID AGREEMENT TO ARBITRATE EXISTS Section 682.03(1), Florida Statutes (2006), states: “If . . .

INFINITY DESIGN BUILDERS, INC. v. M. F. HUTCHINSON,, 964 So. 2d 752 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . complaint in circuit court seeking a stay of the arbitration proceeding in accordance with section 682.03 . . .

CHARLES BOYD CONSTRUCTION INC. v. VACATION BEACH, INC., 959 So. 2d 1227 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . Florida Arbitration Code that corresponds with section 4 of the Federal Arbitration Act is section 682.03 . . . The comparability of section 4 of the Federal Arbitration Act and section 682.03(1), Florida Statutes . . . Fairways Plaza Assocs., 412 So.2d 871 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982), held that the operative language of section 682.03 . . .

REGALADO, C. v. CABEZAS, 959 So. 2d 282 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . provision for arbitration subject to this law, unless the matter was determined in proceedings under s. 682.03 . . .

FREEDOM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, v. WALLANT, 953 So. 2d 16 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . Section 682.03(1), Florida Statutes (2005), authorizes an ‘application to the court’ to proceed with . . .

O KEEFE ARCHITECTS, INC. v. CED CONSTRUCTION PARTNERS, LTD., 944 So. 2d 181 (Fla. 2006)

. . . .” § 682.03(1), Fla. Stat. (2005). . . . See § 682.03(1), Fla. . . .

KEL HOMES, LLC, v. BURRIS,, 933 So. 2d 699 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . See § 682.03(1), Fla. . . .

ROWE ENTERPRISES LLC LLC, v. INTERNATIONAL SYSTEMS ELECTRONICS CORPORATION, a a, 932 So. 2d 537 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . issue because, for purposes of this appeal, the relevant provisions of the two acts (i.e., section 682.03 . . . Section 682.03(1) of the Florida Arbitration Code reads: A party to an agreement or provision for arbitration . . . It is clear that, pursuant to section 682.03(1) of the Florida Arbitration Code, when a factual dispute . . .

D. MARR, v. T. WEBB,, 930 So. 2d 734 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . provision for arbitration subject to this law, unless the matter was determined in proceedings under s. 682.03 . . .

J. LINDEN, v. AUTO TREND, INC. a a, 923 So. 2d 1281 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . Section 682.03(1), Florida Statutes (2005), governs proceedings to compel arbitration. . . . require the filing of a pleading before the court makes this preliminary determination; rather section 682.03 . . . Because “[sjpeedy resolution of disputes is the raison d’etre of arbitration,” section 682.03(1) contemplates . . . court that a disputed issue exists “as to the making of the agreement” within the meaning of section 682.03 . . .

WEGNER, Dr. v. SCHILLINGER,, 921 So. 2d 854 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . Section 682.03(1), Florida Statutes (2005), authorizes an “application to the court” to proceed with . . .

HOUCHINS v. KING MOTOR COMPANY OF FORT LAUDERDALE, INC., 906 So. 2d 325 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . Section 682.03(1), Florida Statutes provides: A party to an agreement or provision for arbitration subject . . . latter requirement contemplates an expedited ev-identiary hearing.” 425 So.2d at 129 (quoting section 682.03 . . .

TANDEM HEALTH CARE OF ST. PETERSBURG, INC. a v. WHITNEY, I., 897 So. 2d 531 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . Section 682.03(1), Florida Statutes (2003), furnishes a guide to the procedure that the trial court must . . . The trial court in Proper was able to comply with Section 682.03(1) by summarily hearing the issue and . . .

PRESIDENTIAL LEASING, INC. v. KROUT,, 896 So. 2d 938 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . . also penalizes the Buyers for exercising their rights under the Florida Arbitration Code, section 682.03 . . .

EPSTEIN, v. PRECISION RESPONSE CORPORATION, a, 883 So. 2d 377 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . Epstein’s complaint sought only a stay of the arbitration proceedings pursuant to section 682.03(4), . . . agreement or provision and, according to its determination, shall grant or deny the application. § 682.03 . . .

R. A. M. OF SOUTH FLORIDA, INC. v. WCI COMMUNITIES, INC., 869 So. 2d 1210 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . See § 682.03(1), Fla. Stat. (2000); Riverwalk Apts., L.P. v. RTM Gen. . . .

VISTA HEALTHPLAN, INC. f k a HIP VISTA f k a a v. HCA, INC. HCA d b a d b a d b a JFK d b a JFK d b a d b a d b a d b a d b a Of d b a d b a, 861 So. 2d 102 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . Section 682.03(3), Florida Statutes (2003) provides that any action involving an issue subject to arbitration . . . would apply in every ease, and staying the arbitration for that reason would be contrary to section 682.03 . . .

HOLT v. O BRIEN IMPORTS OF FORT MYERS, INC. d b a, 862 So. 2d 87 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . provision also penalizes the Buyers for exercising their rights under the Florida Arbitration Code, section 682.03 . . .

GAINESVILLE HEALTH CARE CENTER, INC. d b a v. WESTON,, 857 So. 2d 278 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . Savanna Club Corp., 592 So.2d 344, 347 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992) (discussing “separability” pursuant to section 682.03 . . .

AVATAR PROPERTIES, INC. v. N. C. J. INVESTMENT COMPANY,, 848 So. 2d 1259 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . N.C.J. also could have, but did not, seek relief when Avatar joined it to the arbitration: section 682.03 . . . N.C.J. argues that sections 682.13(l)(e) and 682.03(4) presuppose an arbitration agreement between the . . .

THREE PALMS POINTE, INC. v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY,, 250 F. Supp. 2d 1357 (M.D. Fla. 2003)

. . . For example, Florida courts have repeatedly utilized Florida Statutes § 682.03 as a basis to compel appraisals . . .

JOHN B. GOODMAN LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, L. L. P. v. THF CONSTRUCTION, INC. f. k. a., 321 F.3d 1094 (11th Cir. 2003)

. . . In language similar to that used in the FAA, § 682.03(1) of the Florida Arbitration Code states: “If . . . Section 682.03, Florida Statutes (1989), contains several provisions establishing the separable nature . . . See also Section 682.03(4), Florida Statutes (1989). . . .

L. SMITH, v. CORLEY,, 835 So. 2d 364 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . provision for arbitration subject to this law, unless the matter was determined in proceedings under s. 682.03 . . .

BRANDON, JONES, SANDALL, ZEIDE, KOHN, CHALAL MUSSO, P. A. d b a a v. INC. a a L. P. a J., 203 F.R.D. 677 (S.D. Fla. 2001)

. . . . § 4 and Section 682.03(1) of the Florida Statutes. . . . .2d 159, 160 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) (noting that “[t]he only proper parties to a lawsuit under section 682.03 . . . claims for “fraud” and “breach of contract” are subject to arbitration under 9 U.S.C. § 3 and section 682.03 . . . MedPartners disputes this authority by claiming that the Hospitality Ventures case applies only to section 682.03 . . . However, this section is "similar to section 2 of the Uniform Arbitration Act,” see Fla.Stat.Ann. § 682.03 . . .

I. SOLER a a I. v. SECONDARY HOLDINGS, INC. a a, 771 So. 2d 62 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . See § 682.03(1), (4), Fla. Stat. (1999). . . .

GILBERT CONTRACTORS, INC. a v. N. KAY A., 769 So. 2d 479 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . See Section 682.03(1), Florida Statutes (1999)(If the court shall find that a substantial issue is raised . . .

K. P. MEIRING CONSTRUCTION, INC. v. NORTHBAY I E, INC., 761 So. 2d 1221 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . .” § 682.03. . . . arbitration in Indianapolis under certain conditions, is not enforceable by a trial court pursuant to section 682.03 . . .

HOSPITALITY VENTURES OF CORAL SPRINGS, L. C. a v. AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION INC. a AGB a d b a AGB, 755 So. 2d 159 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . for a party to apply to the court for an order compelling or staying arbitration pursuant to section 682.03 . . . The only proper parties to a lawsuit under section 682.03 to determine the propriety of arbitration are . . .

J. MIRSON, v. CORRADINO GROUP, INC., 751 So. 2d 699 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . any factual issue other than the making of the agreement or provision for arbitration); see section 682.03 . . . Section 682.03(4) Florida Statutes (1997) provides: “On application the court may stay an arbitration . . .

NATIONWIDE MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, v. PINNACLE MEDICAL, INC. M M v. M M, 753 So. 2d 55 (Fla. 2000)

. . . An appeal may be taken from: (a) An order denying an application to compel arbitration made under s. 682.03 . . . (b) An order granting an application to stay arbitration made under s. 682.03(2)-(4). . . .

POOLE AND KENT COMPANY, v. GUSI ERICKSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY,, 759 So. 2d 2 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . action did not expressly describe itself as an application to stay arbitration pursuant to section 682.03 . . .

UNITED STATES FIDELITY GUARANTY COMPANY, v. ROMAY, v., 744 So. 2d 467 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . See Florida Arbitration Code, § 682.03, Fla. Stat. (1995). . . . See § 682.03, Fla. Stat. (1995); Phillips v. General Accident Ins. . . . Co. of Am., 685 So.2d 27, 29 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996) (interpreting the Florida Arbitration Code, § 682.03, . . .

LIBERTY COMMUNICATIONS, INC. v. MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION,, 733 So. 2d 571 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . but better view is to treat motion as a motion to stay and grant it pursuant to sections 682.02 and 682.03 . . .

FIRST MONTAUK SECURITIES CORP. v. FOUR MILE RANCH DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC. a a a B., 65 F. Supp. 2d 1371 (S.D. Fla. 1999)

. . . . § 1 et seq., § 682.03(4) Florida Statutes, and the federal Declaratory Judgment Statute, 28 U.S.C. . . .

FLORIDA SELECT INSURANCE COMPANY, v. KEELEAN,, 727 So. 2d 1131 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . See § 682.03(1), (4), Fla. Stat. (1995). . . . When faced with a motion to compel arbitration under section 682.03, a trial court is limited to considering . . .

RITTMAN, Jr. v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY,, 727 So. 2d 391 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . See § 682.03(3), Fla.Stat. (1995); Okeelanta Corp. v. . . . Section 682.03(3), Fla.Stat., provides: (3) Any action or proceeding involving an issue subject to arbitration . . .

CHANDRA, M. D. v. J. BRADSTREET, M. D., 727 So. 2d 372 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . provision for arbitration subject to this law, unless the matter was determined in proceedings under s. 682.03 . . .

JALIS CONSTRUCTION, INC. v. MINTZ,, 724 So. 2d 1254 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . Under the Florida Arbitration Code, section 682.03(1), Florida Statutes (1997), when the party opposing . . .

NEATE, v. CYPRESS CLUB CONDOMINIUM, INC. a, 718 So. 2d 390 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . better view is to treat the motion as a motion to stay and grant it pursuant to sections 682.02 and 682.03 . . . Section 682.03(3) is part of the Florida Arbitration Code and provides that: “Any action or proceeding . . . application is made in such action or proceeding, the order for arbitration shall include such stay.” § 682.03 . . . light of these provisions in section 718.1255 and the absence of a stay provision comparable to section 682.03 . . .

OKEELANTA CORPORATION, v. UNITED STATES SUGAR CORPORATION, OKEELANTA CORPORATION, v. UNITED STATES SUGAR CORPORATION, Of, 712 So. 2d 814 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . Section 682.03(3), Florida Statutes (1997), requires the court to stay “[a]ny action or proceeding involving . . .

TELECARD COMMUNICATIONS OF FLORIDA, INC. v. POWELL, a, 700 So. 2d 1235 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . Mason, 677 So.2d 105, 107 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); § 682.03(3) Fla. Stat. (1995). . . .

ISLAND HOUSE DEVELOPERS, INC. v. AMAC CONSTRUCTION, INC., 686 So. 2d 1377 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . See §§ 489.128, 682.02, 682.03, Fla.Stat.; Castro v. . . .

GALE GROUP, INC. f k a v. WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION,, 683 So. 2d 661 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . In considering motions to compel arbitration pursuant to section 682.03, Florida Statutes (1993), the . . .

PHILLIPS, v. GENERAL ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA,, 685 So. 2d 27 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . main issues: “The trial court’s role when considering applications to compel arbitration under Section 682.03 . . .

EMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, v. MASON,, 677 So. 2d 105 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . Turning now to the issue of a dismissal versus a stay, we initially note that section 682.03(3), Florida . . . better view is to treat the motion as a motion to stay and grant it pursuant to sections 682.02 and 682.03 . . .

MONTESINO, v. ADVENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 676 So. 2d 32 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . filed a motion in circuit court to stay arbitration and for permanent injunction, pursuant to section 682.03 . . .

WOODLAKE REDEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, v. WOODLAKE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION OF MARCO SHORES, INC. S. W. A. R. R. L., 671 So. 2d 253 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . Section 682.03(3), Florida Statutes (1995), provides as follows: (3) Any action or proceeding involving . . .